Haemophilus ducreyi is highly infectious. In an experimental model, inoculation of only 1 colony-forming unit induced papule formation in 50% of volunteers.[28]Al-Tawfiq JA, Harezlak J, Katz BP, et al. Cumulative experience with Haemophilus ducreyi 35000 in the human model of experimental infection. Sex Transm Dis. 2000 Feb;27(2):111-4.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10676978?tool=bestpractice.com
Another study found that 70% of women who had contact with an infected man developed the disease.[29]D'Costa LJ, Plummer FA, Bowmer I, et al. Prostitutes are a major reservoir of sexually transmitted diseases in Nairobi, Kenya. Sex Transm Dis. 1985 Apr-Jun;12(2):64-7.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4002094?tool=bestpractice.com
[30]Ronald AR, Plummer FA. Chancroid and granuloma inguinale. Clin Lab Med. 1989 Sep;9(3):535-43.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2676322?tool=bestpractice.com
The incubation period is 3-7 days.[31]Lautenschlager S, Kemp M, Christensen JJ, et al. 2017 European guideline for the management of chancroid. Int J STD AIDS. 2017 Mar;28(4):324-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28081686?tool=bestpractice.com
H ducreyi has a brief period of infectivity and requires a frequent turnover of sexual partners to be maintained within a population.[11]Steen R. Eradicating chancroid. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(9):818-26.
https://scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862001000900006&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11584729?tool=bestpractice.com
[29]D'Costa LJ, Plummer FA, Bowmer I, et al. Prostitutes are a major reservoir of sexually transmitted diseases in Nairobi, Kenya. Sex Transm Dis. 1985 Apr-Jun;12(2):64-7.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4002094?tool=bestpractice.com
[32]Plummer FA, D'Costa LJ, Nsanze H, et al. Epidemiology of chancroid and Haemophilus ducreyi in Nairobi, Kenya. Lancet. 1983 Dec 3;2(8362):1293-5.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6139629?tool=bestpractice.com
For this reason, sex workers have been an important reservoir in most epidemics.
The sequence of pathogenesis is as follows:
The skin, which provides an excellent barrier to infection, is breached, usually by a tear or abrasion. H ducreyi enters the breach and preferentially attacks the mucosal epithelium.[33]Spinola SM, Bauer ME, Munson RS Jr. Immunopathogenesis of Haemophilus ducreyi infection (chancroid). Infect Immun. 2002 Apr;70(4):1667-76.
http://iai.asm.org/content/70/4/1667.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11895928?tool=bestpractice.com
[34]Bauer ME, Spinola SM. Localization of Haemophilus ducreyi at the pustular stage of disease in the human model of infection. Infect Immun. 2000 Apr;68(4):2309-14.
http://iai.asm.org/content/68/4/2309.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10722634?tool=bestpractice.com
At the site of entry, epithelial cells are infiltrated by polymorphonuclear leukocytes and macrophages. This leads to the secretion of interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-6, recruiting mononuclear cells to the dermis, including CD4 cells.[17]Morse SA. Chancroid and Haemophilus ducreyi. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1989 Apr;2(2):137-57.
http://cmr.asm.org/content/2/2/137.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2650859?tool=bestpractice.com
[33]Spinola SM, Bauer ME, Munson RS Jr. Immunopathogenesis of Haemophilus ducreyi infection (chancroid). Infect Immun. 2002 Apr;70(4):1667-76.
http://iai.asm.org/content/70/4/1667.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11895928?tool=bestpractice.com
The inflammatory reaction manifests as 1 or more painless papules on an erythematous base, which over the next few days either resolve spontaneously or become pustular and ulcerate. Women are more likely to have spontaneous resolution of the papule, whereas men are more likely to progress to the pustular stage.[35]Bong CT, Harezlak J, Katz BP, et al. Men are more susceptible than women to pustule formation in the experimental model of Haemophilus ducreyi infection. Sex Transm Dis. 2002 Feb;29(2):114-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11818898?tool=bestpractice.com
[36]Spinola SM, Bong CT, Faber AL, et al. Differences in host susceptibility to disease progression in the human challenge model of Haemophilus ducreyi infection. Infect Immun. 2003 Nov;71(11):6658-63.
http://iai.asm.org/content/71/11/6658.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14573692?tool=bestpractice.com
If left untreated, the ulcers are slowly destructive and may last for months, causing permanent scarring.[17]Morse SA. Chancroid and Haemophilus ducreyi. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1989 Apr;2(2):137-57.
http://cmr.asm.org/content/2/2/137.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2650859?tool=bestpractice.com
The reasons why H ducreyi is so infectious are incompletely understood. There are a number of proposed virulence factors that mediate the initial infection (pili and outer membrane proteins), cause tissue damage (haemolysins, heat shock proteins, lipopolysaccharide), and enable evasion of and resistance to host defences (lipopolysaccharide, resistance to alpha- and beta-defensins).[2]Trees DL, Morse SA. Chancroid and Haemophilus ducreyi: an update. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1995 Jul;8(3):357-75.
http://cmr.asm.org/content/8/3/357.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7553570?tool=bestpractice.com
[33]Spinola SM, Bauer ME, Munson RS Jr. Immunopathogenesis of Haemophilus ducreyi infection (chancroid). Infect Immun. 2002 Apr;70(4):1667-76.
http://iai.asm.org/content/70/4/1667.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11895928?tool=bestpractice.com
[37]Throm RE, Spinola SM. Transcription of candidate virulence genes of Haemophilus ducreyi during infection of human volunteers. Infect Immun. 2001 Mar;69(3):1483-7.
http://iai.asm.org/content/69/3/1483.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11179316?tool=bestpractice.com
[38]Dutro SM, Wood GE, Totten PA. Prevalence of, antibody response to, and immunity induced by Haemophilus ducreyi hemolysin. Infect Immun. 1999 Jul;67(7):3317-28.
http://iai.asm.org/content/67/7/3317.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10377108?tool=bestpractice.com
[39]Purven M, Lagergård T. Haemophilus ducreyi, a cytotoxin-producing bacterium. Infect Immun. 1992 Mar;60(3):1156-62.
http://iai.asm.org/content/60/3/1156.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1541531?tool=bestpractice.com
[40]Mount KL, Townsend CA, Bauer ME. Haemophilus ducreyi is resistant to human antimicrobial peptides. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Sep;51(9):3391-3.
http://aac.asm.org/content/51/9/3391.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17620373?tool=bestpractice.com
Circumcision is protective against infection. This may be because the moist area under the foreskin is conducive to replication. Additionally, the epithelium lining the inner surfaces of the foreskin and frenulum is less cornified and more susceptible to abrasions, particularly during intercourse, therefore providing more entry sites for the organism.[15]Spinola, SM. Chancroid and Haemophilus ducreyi. In: Holmes KK, Sparling PF, Stamm WE, et al, eds. Sexually transmitted diseases. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 2008:689-700.[23]Van Howe RS. Genital ulcerative disease and sexually transmitted urethritis and circumcision: a meta-analysis. Int J STD AIDS. 2007 Dec;18(12):799-809.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18073009?tool=bestpractice.com
[24]Weiss HA, Thomas SL, Munabi SK, et al. Male circumcision and risk of syphilis, chancroid, and genital herpes: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Apr;82(2):101-10.
http://sti.bmj.com/content/82/2/101.full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16581731?tool=bestpractice.com