Investigations

1st investigations to order

plain x-rays

Test
Result
Test

Distinguishing acute from chronic fractures on plain radiographs can be difficult. Well-demarcated fracture lines or distinct discontinuity of a thin cortical margin suggest an acute fracture.

An old injury is suggested by sclerosis of the fracture lines, a dense cortical margin, and osteophytes bordering the fracture site.[1][Figure caption and citation for the preceding image starts]: Lateral radiograph showing a T12 compression fracture in osteoporotic bonePersonal collection of Nasir A. Quraishi [Citation ends].com.bmj.content.model.Caption@6932211a

Result

lateral view shows wedging of anterior vertebral body and local kyphosis; anteroposterior view may show interpedicular widening and/or spinous process malalignment suggesting posterior vertebral body involvement

Investigations to consider

CT spine

Test
Result
Test

Useful for assessing bony architecture, but less useful for soft tissues. In patients with new symptomatic vertebral compression fractures identified on radiographs and no known malignancy, CT (or MRI) spine of the area of interest is usually appropriate for pre-procedural planning, if intervention is being considered.[9][50]​ CT (or MRI) spine of the area of interest is particularly useful for initial imaging if radiographs are negative.[50]​ CT provides osseous details of axial spine fractures before vertebral augmentation and permits evaluation of vertebral body height, architecture, and integrity of the posterior cortex and pedicles before vertebral augmentation, which is critical in patients with cortical disruption, posterior cortex osseous retropulsion, and spinal canal compression.​[9]

Result

shows fracture configuration; useful in excluding unstable crush fractures and pathological fractures

MRI spine

Test
Result
Test

Useful in distinguishing between osteoporotic compression fractures and those caused by underlying tumour or infection.[1][9][50]​ MRI (or CT) spine of the area of interest is particularly useful for initial imaging if radiographs are negative.[50]​​

In patients with asymptomatic vertebral compression fractures identified on radiographs and no known malignancy, MRI (or CT) spine of the area of interest is usually appropriate for pre-procedural planning, if intervention is being considered.[9]

Can be helpful for distinguishing healed from recent fractures. This may have predictive value in choosing levels for vertebroplasty.

If there are neurological signs, concerns over fracture stability, or a suspicion that fractures may be pathological, a CT scan and/or an MRI is indicated.[19] MRI is more useful than CT for assessing the integrity of the soft tissue and neural structures, particularly that of the spinal canal.[50]​ MRI is the only modality for evaluating the internal structure of the spinal cord.​[58]

Result

shows fracture with no evidence of soft-tissue mass or signal change extending into the pedicle (which would strongly suggest tumour)

technetium-99m (Tc-99m) whole-body bone scan (bone scintigraphy)

Test
Result
Test

May be helpful to determine the painful vertebrae, particularly the causative level.[9]​ 

Whole-body bone scans may be helpful in the setting of compression fractures to help identify fracture acuity and to appropriately select patients for intervention, particularly if MRI cannot be safely/easily obtained.[50][59]​​

Result

hot spot at site of fracture

single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT

Test
Result
Test

Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) coupled with CT may also be appropriate.[9][50]​ SPECT imaging provides complementary information because sites of abnormal radio-pharmaceutical uptake on the spine are of interest.​[9] SPECT/CT has been shown to localise abnormalities in the vertebra more precisely compared with SPECT imaging alone, particularly in complicated cases, such as multiple collapsed vertebrae of different ages.​[9][60] SPECT/CT appears to be comparable to MRI in detecting fractures, particularly in the acute phase, and could be considered if MRI is contraindicated​​.[61][62]​​

Result

bone densitometry scan

Test
Result
Test

Confirmatory test for osteoporosis.[11]

Result

shows reduced bone density in osteoporosis

CT myelogram

Test
Result
Test

If spinal hardware is present, CT myelography may be useful in the assessment of hardware integrity and position.[50][63]​​

Result

useful in assessment of hardware integrity and position

FBC

Test
Result
Test

A test of exclusion, but may be useful if either malignancy or infection is suspected.

Result

normal

bone profile (including serum calcium and alkaline phosphatase)

Test
Result
Test

A bone profile may be useful to exclude a metabolic cause. This includes serum calcium, albumin, parathyroid hormone, phosphate, alkaline phosphatase, magnesium, creatinine, and serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD).

Other tests such as thyroid-stimulating hormone, screening for hypercortisolism, and serum protein electrophoresis may also be considered.

Result

normal

C-reactive protein

Test
Result
Test

A test of exclusion, but may be useful if malignancy or infection is suspected.

Result

normal

blood cultures

Test
Result
Test

A test of exclusion, but may be useful if infection is suspected.

Result

normal

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer