Diabetic retinopathy is a chronic, progressive disease.
Patients treated with macular laser therapy alone for diabetic macular edema may show recurrence in the same or other eye. Treatment is usually limited to areas of retinal thickening, and untreated areas may develop edema. Visual loss may develop despite treatment.[80]Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Treatment techniques and clinical guidelines for photocoagulation of diabetic macular edema. ETDRS report number 2. Ophthalmology. 1987 Jul;94(7):761-74.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3658348?tool=bestpractice.com
By contrast, patients treated for center-involving diabetic macular edema with ranibizumab and either deferred or prompt laser gained 9.8 or 7.2 letters over a 5 year period.[131]Bressler SB, Glassman AR, Almukhtar T, et al. Five-year outcomes of ranibizumab with prompt or deferred laser versus laser or triamcinolone plus deferred ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Apr;164:57-68.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4811755
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26802783?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients treated with panretinal photocoagulation alone for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) are less likely to lose vision through vitreous hemorrhage than those who are untreated. Although hemorrhage can occur despite treatment, many patients reach a steady state in which fibrovascular proliferation ceases.[74]Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Clinical application of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (DRS) findings, DRS report number 8. Ophthalmology. 1981 Jul;88(7):583-600.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7196564?tool=bestpractice.com
It is possible, given the superior visual acuity results obtained with aflibercept monotherapy compared with panretinal photocoagulation in the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy, that prognosis for this condition may improve in the future.[123]Sivaprasad S, Prevost AT, Vasconcelos JC, et al. Clinical efficacy of intravitreal aflibercept versus panretinal photocoagulation for best corrected visual acuity in patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy at 52 weeks (CLARITY): a multicentre, single-blinded, randomised, controlled, phase 2b, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017 Jun 3;389(10085):2193-203.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)31193-5/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28494920?tool=bestpractice.com
Eyes that have undergone vitrectomy commonly show little postoperative progression of retinopathy.
In higher resource countries in which effective primary care, screening, and secondary care resources are available, good visual outcomes can be achieved.[35]Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network, Wells JA, Glassman AR, et al. Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema. N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 26;372(13):1193-203.
https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1414264
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25692915?tool=bestpractice.com
[122]Writing Committee for the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network. Panretinal photocoagulation vs intravitreous ranibizumab for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. JAMA. 2015 Nov 24;314(20):2137-46.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26565927?tool=bestpractice.com
However, even in high-resource countries, visual prognosis for some may be poor. The 5-year loss to follow-up excluding deaths in the studies above was around 40%, and loss to follow-up is associated with visual loss.[132]Gross JG, Glassman AR, Liu D, et al. Five-year outcomes of panretinal photocoagulation vs intravitreous ranibizumab for proliferative diabetic retinopathy: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Oct 1;136(10):1138-48.
https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.3255
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30043039?tool=bestpractice.com
[133]Glassman AR, Wells JA 3rd, Josic K, et al. Five-year outcomes after initial aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab treatment for diabetic macular edema (Protocol T extension study). Ophthalmology. 2020 Sep;127(9):1201-10.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32402554?tool=bestpractice.com
[134]Thompson AC, Thompson MO, Young DL, et al. Barriers to follow-up and strategies to improve adherence to appointments for care of chronic eye diseases. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015 Jul;56(8):4324-31.
https://www.doi.org/10.1167/iovs.15-16444
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26176869?tool=bestpractice.com
[135]Low JR, Gan ATL, Fenwick EK, et al. Role of socio-economic factors in visual impairment and progression of diabetic retinopathy. Br J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;105(3):420-5.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32430341?tool=bestpractice.com
In addition, some individuals and communities within high-resource countries may have poorer prognosis.
In many lower- and middle-income countries, and in newly affluent countries, primary care, screening programs, and secondary care may not be sufficient to identify patients with sight-threatening retinopathy and permit timely and appropriate treatment. In such contexts, the visual prognosis of diabetic retinopathy may be poor.
A meta-analysis found that the presence of any retinopathy increased all-cause mortality/major cardiovascular events in both type 1 (odds ratio 1.58) and type 2 diabetes (odds ratio 2.34). This effect was more pronounced in patients with advanced retinopathy, both in type 1 (odds ratio 7.00), and type 2 (odds ratio 4.22). Not all additional mortality could be explained on the basis of cardiovascular events.[136]Kramer CK, Rodrigues TC, Canani LH, et al. Diabetic retinopathy predicts all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in both type 1 and 2 diabetes: meta-analysis of observational studies. Diabetes Care. 2011 May;34(5):1238-44.
https://www.doi.org/10.2337/dc11-0079
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21525504?tool=bestpractice.com