Evidence

This page contains a snapshot of featured content which highlights evidence addressing key clinical questions including areas of uncertainty. Please see the main topic reference list for details of all sources underpinning this topic.

BMJ Best Practice evidence tables

Evidence table logo

Evidence tables provide easily navigated layers of evidence in the context of specific clinical questions, using GRADE and a BMJ Best Practice Effectiveness rating. Follow the links at the bottom of the table, which go to the related evidence score in the main topic text, providing additional context for the clinical question. Find out more about our evidence tables.

This table is a summary of the analysis reported in a Cochrane Clinical Answer that focuses on the above important clinical question.


Confidence in the evidence is moderate or low to moderate where GRADE has been performed and there may be no difference in effectiveness between the intervention and comparison for key outcomes.


Population: Adults in intensive care units with ventilator-acquired pneumonia

Intervention: Short-course antibiotic therapy (for 7 or 8 days)

Comparison: Prolonged-course antibiotic therapy (for 10, 12, 15, or 16 days)

OutcomeEffectiveness (BMJ rating)?Confidence in evidence (GRADE)?

All‐cause 28‐day mortality

No statistically significant difference

Moderate

Recurrence of pneumonia

No statistically significant difference

Low

Recurrence of pneumonia: pneumonia caused by non‐fermenting Gram‐negative bacilli (NF‐GNB) ᵃ

Favours comparison

Moderate

Recurrence of pneumonia: pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms ᵇ

Favours intervention

GRADE assessment not performed for this outcome

Antibiotic‐free days in 28 days

Favours intervention

Low

Clinical resolution

No statistically significant difference

GRADE assessment not performed for this outcome

Duration of ICU stay

No statistically significant difference

GRADE assessment not performed for this outcome

Duration of mechanical ventilation

No statistically significant difference

GRADE assessment not performed for this outcome

Note

ᵃ Based on a subgroup analysis. The Cochrane Clinical Answer (CCA) also mentions other subgroup analyses in people with MRSA or unspecified organisms. However, these were too small to provide clinically meaningful results. See CCA for more details.

ᵇ This outcome was reported in the Cochrane review that underlies this CCA. However, it was not mentioned in the CCA itself.

This evidence table is related to the following section/s:

Cochrane Clinical Answers

Cochrane library logo

Cochrane Clinical Answers (CCAs) provide a readable, digestible, clinically focused entry point to rigorous research from Cochrane systematic reviews. They are designed to be actionable and to inform decision making at the point of care and have been added to relevant sections of the main Best Practice text.

  • Which regimen is most effective at improving outcomes in critically ill adults with hospital‐acquired pneumonia: short‐course or prolonged‐course antibiotic therapy?
    Show me the answer

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer