Patients should undergo pneumonia and flu vaccination. Good hydration should be maintained to avoid renal complications.[175]Snowden JA, Ahmedzai SH, Ashcroft J, et al. Guidelines for supportive care in multiple myeloma 2011. Br J Haematol. 2011 Jul;154(1):76-103.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2141.2011.08574.x/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21517805?tool=bestpractice.com
Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs should be minimised, contrast dyes avoided with radiological examinations, and infections treated promptly.
Bisphosphonates (e.g., zoledronic acid, pamidronate) can be used to prevent bone-related complications, including pathological fracture.[176]Anderson K, Ismaila N, Flynn PJ, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in multiple myeloma: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 10;36(8):812-8.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2017.76.6402
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29341831?tool=bestpractice.com
[177]Terpos E, Zamagni E, Lentzsch S, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease: recommendations from the Bone Working Group of the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Mar;22(3):e119-30.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33545067?tool=bestpractice.com
[
]
How do bisphosphonates compare with placebo/no treatment and each other in people with multiple myeloma?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2026/fullShow me the answer Denosumab (a monoclonal antibody that targets the receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand [RANKL]) may be used instead of bisphosphonates, particularly for patients with renal impairment.[176]Anderson K, Ismaila N, Flynn PJ, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in multiple myeloma: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Mar 10;36(8):812-8.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2017.76.6402
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29341831?tool=bestpractice.com
[177]Terpos E, Zamagni E, Lentzsch S, et al. Treatment of multiple myeloma-related bone disease: recommendations from the Bone Working Group of the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Mar;22(3):e119-30.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33545067?tool=bestpractice.com
[178]Raje N, Terpos E, Willenbacher W, et al. Denosumab versus zoledronic acid in bone disease treatment of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an international, double-blind, double-dummy, randomised, controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Mar;19(3):370-81.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29429912?tool=bestpractice.com
In June 2018, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency issued a safety alert following a pooled analysis of four phase 3 studies of denosumab in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone.[179]Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Denosumab (Xgeva) for advanced malignancies involving bone: study data show new primary malignancies reported more frequently compared to zoledronate. Jun 2018 [internet publication].
https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/denosumab-xgeva-for-advanced-malignancies-involving-bone-study-data-show-new-primary-malignancies-reported-more-frequently-compared-to-zoledronate
New primary malignancies were reported more frequently among patients receiving denosumab than those receiving zoledronic acid (cumulative incidence of new primary malignancy at 1 year was 1.1% for denosumab and 0.6% for zoledronic acid). No treatment-related pattern for individual cancers or cancer groupings was identified.