Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a relatively common medical problem with a yearly incidence of approximately 1 in every 1000 adults, and a lifetime risk of approximately 8%.[3]White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003 Jun 17;107(23 suppl 1):I4-8.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/01.CIR.0000078468.11849.66
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12814979?tool=bestpractice.com
[4]Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC yellow book 2024: travel by air, land and sea - deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. May 2023 [internet publication].
https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/yellowbook/2024/air-land-sea/deep-vein-thrombosis-and-pulmonary-embolism
[5]Lutsey PL, Zakai NA. Epidemiology and prevention of venous thromboembolism. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Apr;20(4):248-62.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9579604
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36258120?tool=bestpractice.com
Annually, it is estimated that VTE affects between 1 and 2 per 1000 of the population in the US.[6]Beckman MG, Hooper WC, Critchley SE, et al. Venous thromboembolism: a public health concern. Am J Prev Med. 2010 Apr;38(4 suppl):S495-501.
https://www.ajpmonline.org/article/S0749-3797(09)00946-5/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20331949?tool=bestpractice.com
The incidence of VTE increases markedly with age, from 0.72 per 1000 patient-years in those ages 40-54 years; 1.58 in people ages 55-64 years; 2.47 in people ages 65-74 years; 3.12 in those ages 75-84 years; and 6.96 in those ages ≥85 years.[5]Lutsey PL, Zakai NA. Epidemiology and prevention of venous thromboembolism. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Apr;20(4):248-62.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9579604
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36258120?tool=bestpractice.com
Overall the incidence of VTE in men is slightly higher than in women, but there is a female predominance in people under 45 years old or >80 years old.[1]Virani SS, Alonso A, Aparicio HJ, et al; American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Heart disease and stroke statistics - 2021 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):e254-743.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epub/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33501848?tool=bestpractice.com
[5]Lutsey PL, Zakai NA. Epidemiology and prevention of venous thromboembolism. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Apr;20(4):248-62.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9579604
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36258120?tool=bestpractice.com
Compared with people of European ancestry in the US, VTE incidence is higher in African-American people and lower in Asian and American Indian people.[5]Lutsey PL, Zakai NA. Epidemiology and prevention of venous thromboembolism. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2023 Apr;20(4):248-62.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9579604
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36258120?tool=bestpractice.com
[7]Heit JA, Spencer FA, White RH. The epidemiology of venous thromboembolism. J Thromb Thrombolysis. 2016 Jan;41(1):3-14.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4715842
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26780736?tool=bestpractice.com
The incidence of DVT during pregnancy or the postpartum period is approximately 1 case per 1000 live births.[8]Varrias D, Spanos M, Kokkinidis DG, et al. Venous thromboembolism in pregnancy: challenges and solutions. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2023;19:469-84.
https://www.dovepress.com/venous-thromboembolism-in-pregnancy-challenges-and-solutions-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-VHRM
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37492280?tool=bestpractice.com
Other clinical situations are associated with widely variable incidences of DVT. For instance, orthopedic surgical patients have a DVT incidence ranging from approximately 1% to 4% depending upon the utilization of pharmacologic prophylaxis, while the incidence in acutely ill medical patients is approximately 0.5% to 6%, depending heavily upon the method of diagnosis, inclusion of asymptomatic versus only symptomatic VTE, utilization of pharmacologic prophylaxis, and duration of follow-up.[9]Dentali F, Mumoli N, Prisco D, et al. Efficacy and safety of extended thromboprophylaxis for medically ill patients: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Thromb Haemost. 2017 Feb 28;117(3):606-17.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28078350?tool=bestpractice.com
In critically ill patients an incidence as high as 37.2% has been reported.[10]Kaplan D, Casper TC, Elliott CG, et al. VTE incidence and risk factors in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Chest. 2015 Nov;148(5):1224-30.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4631038
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26111103?tool=bestpractice.com
Incidences of DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE) associated with infection by COVID-19 are also broad, with stronger associations with earlier virus variants and more severe illness.[11]Jiménez D, García-Sanchez A, Rali P, et al. Incidence of VTE and bleeding among hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Chest. 2021 Mar;159(3):1182-96.
https://journal.chestnet.org/article/S0012-3692(20)35146-1/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33217420?tool=bestpractice.com
The population incidence is increasing slowly as the proportion of the population that is older increases, and as testing for DVT using ultrasound and testing for PE using multi-detector chest computed tomographic angiography increases.