ST changes on ECG[2]Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 14;40(3):237-69.
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/40/3/237/5079081
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30165617?tool=bestpractice.com
[4]Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, et al. Myocardial infarction redefined - a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Sep;36(3):959-69. [Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Mar 1;37(3):973.]
https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/S0735-1097%2800%2900804-4
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10987628?tool=bestpractice.com
New or presumed new ST-segment elevation at the J point in 2 or more contiguous leads with the cutoff points of ≥1 mm in all leads other than V2, or V3, where the following cutoff points apply:
≥2.5 mm in men <40 years old
≥2 mm in men >40 years old
≥1.5 mm in women regardless of age
New horizontal or downsloping ST-depression ≥0.5 mm in two contiguous leads and/or T-wave inversion >1 mm in two contiguous leads with prominent R wave or R/S ratio >1. Note: ST depressions in leads V1-V4 should be considered as a posterior STEMI.
New or presumed new left bundle branch block (LBBB) in patients with coronary ischemia may be associated with poor prognosis. More importantly, the presence of LBBB on baseline ECG may confound the diagnosis of STEMI. In patients with new left bundle branch block, ≥1mm concordant ST-segment elevation may be an indicator of myocardial ischemia.
Criteria for acute, evolving, or recent myocardial infarction[2]Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 14;40(3):237-69.
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/40/3/237/5079081
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30165617?tool=bestpractice.com
[4]Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, et al. Myocardial infarction redefined - a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Sep;36(3):959-69. [Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Mar 1;37(3):973.]
https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/S0735-1097%2800%2900804-4
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10987628?tool=bestpractice.com
Either one of the following criteria:
1. Typical rise of biomarkers of myocardial necrosis (e.g., troponin) with at least one of the following:
Ischemic symptoms
Development of pathologic Q waves on ECG
ECG changes indicative of ischemia (ST-segment elevation or depression)
Coronary artery intervention (e.g., coronary angiography).
2. Pathologic findings of acute myocardial infarction (MI).
Criteria for established MI[2]Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 14;40(3):237-69.
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/40/3/237/5079081
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30165617?tool=bestpractice.com
[4]Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, et al. Myocardial infarction redefined - a consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the Redefinition of Myocardial Infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Sep;36(3):959-69. [Erratum in: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Mar 1;37(3):973.]
https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/S0735-1097%2800%2900804-4
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10987628?tool=bestpractice.com
Any one of the following:
1. Development of pathologic Q waves on serial ECGs. The patient may or may not remember previous symptoms. Biochemical markers of myocardial necrosis may have normalized, depending on the length of time that has passed since the infarct developed.
2. Pathologic findings of a healed or healing MI.
3. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging with the delayed enhancement imaging showing a classic subendocardial or transmural infarct in a coronary artery distribution.