Treatment algorithm

Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups: see disclaimer

INITIAL

premature very low birth weight infants: prophylactic therapy

Back
1st line – 

intravenous indometacin

The cut-off of very low birth weight varies between centres, but is usually <1300 g or <1000 g.

The treatment is based on the premise that treating a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in very low birth weight premature infants will prevent the clinical sequelae of a haemodynamically significant shunt better than waiting for the PDA to become clinically evident.

Treatment can be given at day 0 of life, before clinical evidence of a PDA becomes evident. The first dose is usually started within the first 12 hours of life.

Evidence shows that while prophylactic indometacin might increase ductal closure and decrease the incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage, there are few other short-term or long-term benefits.[48][51][52][53]

Infants being treated with indometacin must have electrolytes, creatinine, urine output, and platelets monitored regularly during administration. Feeds are withheld.

Complications can include necrotising enterocolitis, bleeding, or renal dysfunction.[54][55]

If the first course of ibuprofen or indomethacin is unsuccessful, a second course is usually given prior to consideration of procedural closure.[57]

Primary options

indometacin: 0.1 mg/kg intravenously once daily for 3 days

ACUTE

premature infants (<32 weeks)

Back
1st line – 

ibuprofen or indometacin

Cyclo-oxygenase inhibitors (e.g., non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) inhibit prostaglandins, and have been shown to be effective in ductal closure in preterm infants.[27] Treatment is given in the first few days of life after a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) has become clinically evident or has been diagnosed by echo.

Indometacin was previously the standard of care; however, ibuprofen is now largely considered the pharmacotherapy of choice due to its similar efficacy but significantly better safety profile.[56][57][58][59]

One Cochrane review comparing both oral and intravenous ibuprofen with indometacin found a decreased risk of necrotising enterocolitis and transient kidney injury in patients treated with ibuprofen, with similar effectiveness between interventions.[56] [ Cochrane Clinical Answers logo ] ​ Both ibuprofen and indomethacin have been shown to reduce the risk of severe intraventricular haemorrhage, although indomethacin appears to be more effective, hence why it is used in preference to ibuprofen as a prophylactic treatment in very low birth weight babies.[53]​ Studies suggest that high-dose ibuprofen may increase the likelihood of PDA closure compared to standard-dose ibuprofen.[53][56][60][61]​​​ High-dose ibuprofen may therefore be considered the preferred dosage; however, significant caution should be exercised in preterm infants younger than 26 weeks due to a lack of data in this age group.[57] Studies have reported that oral ibuprofen is as effective as intravenous ibuprofen, with no significant difference in morbidity demonstrated.[56][62][63]

Treatment with indometacin has shown to be successful in closing symptomatic PDAs compared with placebo.[27][64]​ While some centres practice a prolonged course of indometacin (>4 and usually 7 doses), no significant difference has been shown in successful PDA closure, need for retreatment, need for surgical ligation, or such outcomes as mortality and the incidence of comorbidities such as chronic lung disease or necrotising enterocolitis with this longer regimen.[65]

Infants being treated with ibuprofen and indometacin must have electrolytes, creatinine, urine output, and platelets followed regularly during administration. Feeds are withheld. B-type natriuretic peptide-guided treatment has been shown to reduce the number of primary indometacin doses in infants with PDA.[66] Complications with indometacin can include necrotising enterocolitis, bleeding, or renal dysfunction.[54][55]

If the first course of ibuprofen or indometacin is unsuccessful, a second course is usually given prior to consideration of procedural closure.[57]

Primary options

ibuprofen lysine: standard-dose regimen: 10 mg/kg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 5 mg/kg every 24 hours for 2 doses; high-dose regimen: 15-20 mg/kg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 7.5 to 10 mg/kg every 24 hours for 2 doses

Secondary options

indometacin: infants <48 hours of age: 0.2 mg/kg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 0.1 mg/kg every 12-24 hours for 2 doses; infants 2-7 days of age: 0.2 mg/kg intravenously every 12-24 hours for 3 doses; infants >7 days of age: 0.2 mg/kg intravenously as a loading dose, followed by 0.25 mg/kg every 12-24 hours for 2 doses

OR

ibuprofen: standard-dose regimen: 10 mg/kg orally as a loading dose, followed by 5 mg/kg every 24 hours for 2 doses; high-dose regimen: 15-20 mg/kg orally as a loading dose, followed by 7.5 to 10 mg/kg every 24 hours for 2 doses

Back
2nd line – 

conservative management

Conservative management may be considered as an alternative to medical treatment in certain circumstances.

The Canadian Paediatric Society makes a conditional recommendation for conservative management of symptomatic PDA in the first 1-2 weeks post-birth.[57]

One systematic review and meta-analysis found no significant differences in morbidity or mortality in clinical trials assessing conservative management compared to pharmacological or surgical treatment in preterm infants.[67] One Cochrane review had similar findings, with early (<7 days old) or very early (<72 hours old) empirical treatment of PDA no more effective than conservative management in mortality or morbidity outcomes (including development of chronic lung disease, necrotising enterocolitis, severe intraventricular haemorrhage, or neurodevelopmental abnormalities).[68] One multi-centre randomised controlled trial found that expectant management for PDA in extremely premature infants was non-inferior to early ibuprofen treatment with respect to necrotising enterocolitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, or death at 36 weeks’ post-menstrual age.[69]

Conservative management in preterm infants may involve diuretic therapy, increasing positive airway pressures, and fluid restriction, although these approaches have not been systematically assessed in clinical trials.[57][59][70][71]

Significant caution should be exercised if considering conservative management in high-risk preterm infants (e.g., those younger than 26 weeks).[57]

Back
2nd line – 

surgical ligation

Surgical ligation is usually considered after medical therapy has failed to result in ductal closure or is contraindicated.[57] It can be performed on premature infants as small as 600 g. Surgical ligation of the duct generally has very high success rates with low associated morbidity.[73][75]​ Complications are rare and include recanalisation of the duct, pneumothorax, effusion, haemorrhage, and wound infection.[74]​ While one study did show a relatively high late mortality in preterm infants, this was felt to be related to the high risk inherent in this population, rather than to the surgery itself.[75]​ There has been some inquiry into the favourability of surgical ligation as first-line management in this population.[76][77]​ However, there are currently limited data to allow for adequate comparison of the two treatment approaches.[76] [ Cochrane Clinical Answers logo ] ​ One review suggested that there may be little benefit to prophylactic surgical ligation compared with no therapy or medical therapy, with no significant decrease in mortality or bronchopulmonary dysplasia.[78] Another review refuted earlier postulations that primary surgical ligation may decrease the incidence of necrotising enterocolitis.[79]

Videothorascopic surgical ligation is being used with increasing frequency in selected cases with good results.[80]

Back
2nd line – 

percutaneous catheter device closure

Transcatheter closure of PDA in preterm and extremely low birth weight infants is becoming more feasible and less complicated with the advent of smaller devices and smaller delivery sheaths. In practice, this is becoming a more common second-line therapy for ductal closure than surgical ligation in most academic centres.[57][59]

Catheter devices include coils, the Amplatzer duct occluder, the Rashkind umbrella device, and the Gianturco-Grifka occlusion device. Choice of device depends on ductal morphology and operator choice during the procedure.[81] Patients are given subacute bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis for 6 months after the procedure, or longer if turbulent flow persists around the device.[82]

term infants and children: small-to-moderate-sized ducts

Back
1st line – 

percutaneous catheter device closure

In asymptomatic or symptomatic patients, percutaneous catheter closure is the first-line treatment to treat heart failure and prevent elevated pulmonary pressures or endarteritis. It avoids surgery and can usually be done with just a day admission or overnight hospital stay. Safe device closure has been reported in patients as young as 6 months and as small as 5 kg.[83]​ With infants who are symptomatic and aged >6 months, percutaneous catheter device closure is carried out as soon as possible. In symptomatic infants aged <6 months, intervention is delayed if possible. In these circumstances, provided that the child is gaining weight adequately, temporary use of diuretic therapy with furosemide can control symptoms and give time for the infant to grow to a more suitable size for percutaneous intervention. Percutaneous catheter device closure is also the first-line treatment in asymptomatic patients, though this is delayed where possible until the patient is aged ≥1 year or more. In children aged >1 year, the procedure can be scheduled at the time of diagnosis, either electively or as needed, depending on their symptoms and left heart overload.

The procedure has an extremely high success rate of >95% with no mortality and few complications.[85][86]​ Complications can include coil embolisation, persistent turbulent flow around the device, and residual leak.[86][87]​ Complications are more likely to occur in smaller children.[87] ​There are several types of devices that can be employed for catheter closure and choice of device usually depends on the morphology of the duct.[81]

Catheter devices include coils, the Amplatzer duct occluder, the Rashkind umbrella device, and the Gianturco-Grifka occlusion device. Choice of device depends on ductal morphology and operator choice during the procedure.[81] Patients are given sub-acute bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis for 6 months after the procedure, or longer if turbulent flow persists around the device.[82]

Back
Consider – 

diuretics

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

Infants who are symptomatic may not be large enough to undergo percutaneous device closure at the time of presentation. In these circumstances, provided that the child is gaining weight adequately, temporary use of diuretic therapy with furosemide can control symptoms and give time for the infant to grow to a more suitable size for percutaneous intervention.

Primary options

furosemide: 0.5 to 2 mg/kg intravenously every 6-12 hours

term infants and children: large ducts and/or symptomatic infants too small for device closure

Back
1st line – 

surgical ligation

Some patent ducts are too large to be closed by a percutaneous catheter device, yet closure is required either to treat or prevent heart failure from the left-to-right shunt or to prevent endarteritis. This may be recognised at initial work-up or when an attempted device closure is made.

If the patient is symptomatic, surgical ligation is undertaken as soon as possible. If asymptomatic, ligation can be scheduled electively. Success is high with few complications that can include operative pneumothorax, haemorrhage, effusion, or long-term recanalisation.[73][75]

With increased percutaneous device closure experience, smaller and younger children are being taken to the catheterisation laboratory, so referral for surgical ligation is decreasing in infants younger than 6 months, although this is dependent on institution.[83][88]

adults

Back
1st line – 

percutaneous catheter device closure

In certain adults with patent ductus arteriosus (PDA), closure may be necessary if there is significant left-to-right shunt and/or pulmonary hypertension. Surgical or catheter-based closure is recommended, provided that pulmonary vascular resistance is not prohibitively high.[89][90]​ Currently, most advocate closure via a transcatheter device in adults with a small-to-moderate patent ductus; this has been shown to be safe and effective in this population.[91][92]

Catheter devices include coils, the Amplatzer duct occluder, the Rashkind umbrella device, and the Gianturco-Grifka occlusion device. Choice of device depends on ductal morphology and operator choice during the procedure.[81] Patients are given subacute bacterial endocarditis prophylaxis for 6 months after the procedure, or longer if turbulent flow persists around the device.[82]

Back
2nd line – 

surgical ligation

In certain adults with PDA, closure may be necessary if there is significant left-to-right shunt and/or pulmonary hypertension. Concerns regarding ductal tissue friability in adults with larger patent ductus have led some centres to pursue video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) ligation, with good results.[93]

back arrow

Choose a patient group to see our recommendations

Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups. See disclaimer

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer