There are no proven primary preventative measures for ovarian cancer, but several approaches may reduce the risk of it developing.
The use of oral contraceptives for a period of 5 years is associated with a 50% decrease in the risk of ovarian cancer, which decreases further with longer duration of use.[38]Beral V, Doll R, Hermon C, et al; Collaborative Group on Epidemiological Studies of Ovarian Cancer. Ovarian cancer and oral contraceptives: collaborative reanalysis of data from 45 epidemiological studies including 23,257 women with ovarian cancer and 87,303 controls. Lancet. 2008 Jan 26;371(9609):303-14.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18294997?tool=bestpractice.com
[39]Havrilesky LJ, Moorman PG, Lowery WJ, et al. Oral contraceptive pills as primary prevention for ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jul;122(1):139-47.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23743450?tool=bestpractice.com
[40]Michels KA, Pfeiffer RM, Brinton LA, et al. Modification of the associations between duration of oral contraceptive use and ovarian, endometrial, breast, and colorectal cancers. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;4(4):516-21.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2669779
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29346467?tool=bestpractice.com
[41]Ness RB, Grisso JA, Klapper J, et al; SHARE Study Group. Risk of ovarian cancer in relation to estrogen and progestin dose and use characteristics of oral contraceptives. Am J Epidemiol. 2000 Aug 1;152(3):233-41.
https://academic.oup.com/aje/article/152/3/233/73169
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10933270?tool=bestpractice.com
[42]Crane K. Oral contraceptives as ovarian cancer prevention. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Sep 7;103(17):1286-8.
https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/103/17/1286/2516764
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21852259?tool=bestpractice.com
Tubal ligation and hysterectomy are associated with a decreased risk of ovarian cancer.[54]Hankinson SE, Hunter DJ, Colditz GA, et al. Tubal ligation, hysterectomy, and risk of ovarian cancer. A prospective study. JAMA. 1993 Dec 15;270(23):2813-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8133619?tool=bestpractice.com
[55]Rice MS, Murphy MA, Tworoger SS. Tubal ligation, hysterectomy and ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis. J Ovarian Res. 2012 May 15;5(1):13.
https://ovarianresearch.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1757-2215-5-13
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22587442?tool=bestpractice.com
However, these procedures should only be performed for valid medical reasons, not for their effect on ovarian cancer risk.
Based on data that implicate the fimbriated end of the fallopian tube as the source of serous ovarian cancer, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society of Gynecologic Oncology have recommended that physicians discuss opportunistic salpingectomy for all patients at average risk of ovarian cancer who are undergoing hysterectomy.[56]Society of Gynecologic Oncology. SGO clinical practice statement: salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention. Nov 2013 [internet publication].
https://www.sgo.org/clinical-practice/guidelines/sgo-clinical-practice-statement-salpingectomy-for-ovarian-cancer-prevention
[57]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG committee opinion no. 774: opportunistic salpingectomy as a strategy for epithelial ovarian cancer prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Apr;133(4):e279-84.
https://journals.lww.com/greenjournal/Fulltext/2019/04000/ACOG_Committee_Opinion_No__774__Opportunistic.59.aspx
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30913199?tool=bestpractice.com
However, evidence for opportunistic salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention is mostly derived from observational studies.[58]van Lieshout LAM, Steenbeek MP, De Hullu JA, et al. Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy versus hysterectomy alone. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Aug 28;8(8):CD012858.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD012858.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31456223?tool=bestpractice.com
Risk-reducing surgery for women at high risk
Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) can decrease the risk of ovarian cancer in high-risk patients, such as those with: BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations; mutations associated with Lynch syndrome; or other ovarian cancer susceptibility gene variants.[16]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: colorectal, endometrial, and gastric [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_2
[17]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_2
[59]Rebbeck TR, Kauff ND, Domchek SM. Meta-analysis of risk reduction estimates associated with risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jan 21;101(2):80-7.
https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/101/2/80/1206374
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19141781?tool=bestpractice.com
[60]Kauff ND, Satagopan JM, Robson ME, et al. Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. N Engl J Med. 2002 May 23;346(21):1609-15.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa020119
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12023992?tool=bestpractice.com
[61]Ludwig KK, Neuner J, Butler A, et al. Risk reduction and survival benefit of prophylactic surgery in BRCA mutation carriers, a systematic review. Am J Surg. 2016 Oct;212(4):660-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27649974?tool=bestpractice.com
[62]Paluch-Shimon S, Cardoso F, Sessa C, et al; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Prevention and screening in BRCA mutation carriers and other breast/ovarian hereditary cancer syndromes: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for cancer prevention and screening. Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(suppl 5):v103-10.
https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(19)31645-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27664246?tool=bestpractice.com
[63]Eleje GU, Eke AC, Ezebialu IU, et al. Risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 24;8(8):CD012464.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD012464.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30141832?tool=bestpractice.com
The decision to undergo RRSO (with or without concurrent hysterectomy) and its timing should be individualised (e.g., based on age, whether childbearing has been completed, menopausal status, comorbidities, specific gene mutation, and family history).[16]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: colorectal, endometrial, and gastric [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_2
[17]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_2
[64]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Ovarian cancer: identifying and managing familial and genetic risk. Mar 2024 [internet publication].
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng241
For women with a BRCA1 mutation, guidelines recommend RRSO at age 35 to 40 years (taking into account childbearing wishes).[17]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_2
BRCA2 variants are associated with later ovarian cancer onset, and consideration may be given to delaying RRSO until age 40 to 45 years in these patients (unless there is a family history of early diagnosis). Hysterectomy at the time of RRSO to reduce risk of serous uterine cancer in women with a BRCA mutation may be discussed. Evidence to suggest an increased risk of serous uterine cancer among individuals with BRCA1/2 is limited.[17]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_2
For women with a BRIP1, RAD51C, or RAD51D mutation, RRSO is recommended at age 45 to 50 years.[17]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_2
RRSO may be considered from age 45 to 50 years in women with a PALB2 mutation. Discussions about risk-reducing surgery should start earlier if there is a family history of early-onset disease.[17]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_2
For women with Lynch syndrome, guidelines recommend discussing risk-reducing surgery with women by their early to mid-40s.[20]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin no. 147: Lynch syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Nov;124(5):1042-54.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25437740?tool=bestpractice.com
Evidence supports the use of RRSO in patients with MLH1, MSH2, and EPCAM variants, but is insufficient to recommend risk-reducing surgery for those with MSH6 and PMS2 variants (which are associated with lower risk of ovarian cancer).[16]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: colorectal, endometrial, and gastric [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_2
In addition to RRSO, hysterectomy should be considered for all patients with Lynch syndrome to reduce the risk of endometrial cancer.[16]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: colorectal, endometrial, and gastric [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_2
Non-surgical risk reduction for women at high risk
For high-risk women who decline or are unable to have RRSO, routine screening with transvaginal ultrasound and CA-125 is sometimes considered.[18]Sessa C, Balmaña J, Bober SL, et al. Risk reduction and screening of cancer in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndromes: ESMO clinical practice guideline. Ann Oncol. 2023 Jan;34(1):33-47.
https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(22)04193-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36307055?tool=bestpractice.com
[62]Paluch-Shimon S, Cardoso F, Sessa C, et al; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Prevention and screening in BRCA mutation carriers and other breast/ovarian hereditary cancer syndromes: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for cancer prevention and screening. Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(suppl 5):v103-10.
https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(19)31645-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27664246?tool=bestpractice.com
[65]American College of Radiology. ACR appropriateness criteria: ovarian cancer screening. 2024 [internet publication].
https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69463/Narrative
However, studies do not show a clear benefit and it is not routinely recommended.[16]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: colorectal, endometrial, and gastric [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_2
[17]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_2
The effectiveness of screening women at high risk for ovarian cancer using pelvic examination, CA-125 testing, and transvaginal ultrasound has not been demonstrated; early-stage disease is difficult to detect and may be missed with these approaches.[17]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_2
[66]Cannistra S. Medical progress: cancer of the ovary. N Engl J Med. 2004 Dec 9;351(24):2519-29.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15590954?tool=bestpractice.com
The Risk of Ovarian Cancer Algorithm (ROCA) may have potential utility as a surveillance tool in high-risk women (e.g., with pathogenic germline BRCA1/2 variants) who defer or decline risk-reducing surgery.[67]Philpott S, Raikou M, Manchanda R, et al. The avoiding late diagnosis of ovarian cancer (ALDO) project; a pilot national surveillance programme for women with pathogenic germline variants in BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Med Genet. 2023 May;60(5):440-9.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10176325
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36319079?tool=bestpractice.com
In the UK, National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommend considering surveillance with longitudinal CA125 testing (every 4 months) using an algorithm (such as the ROCA) for patients in the following high-risk groups who defer or decline risk-reducing surgery:[64]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Ovarian cancer: identifying and managing familial and genetic risk. Mar 2024 [internet publication].
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng241
BRCA1 pathogenic variant and age over 35 years
BRCA2 pathogenic variant and age over 40 years
RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1, or PALB2 pathogenic variant and age over 45 years.
In addition, an annual review with discussion of risk-reducing surgery is recommended for these patients.
Surveillance of women at high risk of ovarian cancer represents an interim measure and should not be considered as an alternative to risk-reducing surgery.[68]Manning-Geist BL, Flint M, Roche KL. Prevention over screening for ovarian cancer in patients with high-risk germline mutations: misinterpreting the findings of ALDO. Gynecol Oncol Rep. 2023 Apr;46:101157.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10020112
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36938343?tool=bestpractice.com
Consideration of combination oral contraception or a hormonal intrauterine device (IUD) is recommended as a risk-reducing measure among women with a BRCA mutation.[15]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no 182: hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;130(3):e110-26.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28832484?tool=bestpractice.com
[17]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_2
[62]Paluch-Shimon S, Cardoso F, Sessa C, et al; ESMO Guidelines Committee. Prevention and screening in BRCA mutation carriers and other breast/ovarian hereditary cancer syndromes: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for cancer prevention and screening. Ann Oncol. 2016 Sep;27(suppl 5):v103-10.
https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(19)31645-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27664246?tool=bestpractice.com
Use of a combined oestrogen/progestin contraceptive or a levonorgestrel IUD (LNG-IUD) in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations has been found to reduce ovarian cancer risk to that reported for the general population.[69]Moorman PG, Havrilesky LJ, Gierisch JM, et al. Oral contraceptives and risk of ovarian cancer and breast cancer among high-risk women: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Nov 20;31(33):4188-98.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2013.48.9021
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24145348?tool=bestpractice.com
[70]Huber D, Seitz S, Kast K, et al. Use of oral contraceptives in BRCA mutation carriers and risk for ovarian and breast cancer: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Apr;301(4):875-84.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32140806?tool=bestpractice.com
[71]Wheeler LJ, Desanto K, Teal SB, et al. Intrauterine device use and ovarian cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Oct;134(4):791-800.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31503144?tool=bestpractice.com
[72]Balayla J, Gil Y, Lasry A, et al. Ever-use of the intra-uterine device and the risk of ovarian cancer. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021 Aug;41(6):848-53.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33045859?tool=bestpractice.com
[73]van Bommel MHD, IntHout J, Veldmate G, et al. Contraceptives and cancer risks in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2023 Mar 1;29(2):197-217.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9976973
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36383189?tool=bestpractice.com
Benefits and harms must be weighed and discussed with high-risk patients, including the increased risk of breast cancer associated with long-term oral contraceptive use.[64]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Ovarian cancer: identifying and managing familial and genetic risk. Mar 2024 [internet publication].
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng241
[70]Huber D, Seitz S, Kast K, et al. Use of oral contraceptives in BRCA mutation carriers and risk for ovarian and breast cancer: a systematic review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Apr;301(4):875-84.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32140806?tool=bestpractice.com
[73]van Bommel MHD, IntHout J, Veldmate G, et al. Contraceptives and cancer risks in BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant carriers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2023 Mar 1;29(2):197-217.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9976973
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36383189?tool=bestpractice.com
For women with Lynch syndrome, alternative risk-reduction strategies should be discussed if RRSO is declined or not possible.[16]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: genetic/familial high-risk assessment: colorectal, endometrial, and gastric [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_2
This should include education about symptoms associated with ovarian cancer.