Myelofibrosis
- Overview
- Theory
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Follow up
- Resources
Treatment algorithm
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups: see disclaimer
lower risk: asymptomatic
observation
Symptoms and their severity/burden should be assessed at diagnosis and at each clinical review using a validated tool (e.g., Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form total symptom score [MPN-SAF TSS]).[39]McLornan DP, Godfrey AL, Green A, et al. Diagnosis and evaluation of prognosis of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):127-35. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19164 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37932932?tool=bestpractice.com [42]Emanuel RM, Dueck AC, Geyer HL, et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) symptom assessment form total symptom score: prospective international assessment of an abbreviated symptom burden scoring system among patients with MPNs. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 20;30(33):4098-103. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2012.42.3863 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23071245?tool=bestpractice.com
A validated prognostic scoring system can be used for prognostication and risk stratification (e.g., International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS]; Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System [DIPSS]; Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System-plus [DIPSS-plus]; Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score System for Transplantation-Age Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis [MIPSS70]; Mutation and Karyotype-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis [MIPSS70-plus]; Genetically Inspired Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis [GIPSS]).[11]Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010 Mar 4;115(9):1703-8. http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/cgi/content/full/115/9/1703 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20008785?tool=bestpractice.com [13]Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, et al. MIPSS70+ version 2.0: mutation and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 10;36(17):1769-70. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9867 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708808?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009 Mar 26;113(13):2895-901. http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/113/13/2895.full.pdf+html http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18988864?tool=bestpractice.com [44]Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 1;29(4):392-7. http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2446 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21149668?tool=bestpractice.com [45]Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Rotunno G, et al. MIPSS70: mutation-enhanced international prognostic score system for transplantation-age patients with primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;36(4):310-8. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2017.76.4886 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29226763?tool=bestpractice.com [46]Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Nicolosi M, et al. GIPSS: genetically inspired prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018 Jul;32(7):1631-42. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-018-0107-z http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654267?tool=bestpractice.com
Up to 30% of patients may be asymptomatic at diagnosis.[35]Cervantes F, Pereira A, Esteve J, et al. Identification of 'short-lived' and 'long-lived' patients at presentation of idiopathic myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol. 1997 Jun;97(3):635-40. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9207412?tool=bestpractice.com
Asymptomatic lower-risk patients (e.g., DIPSS score ≤2; MIPSS70 score ≤3) without hyperuricaemia or a remedial cause of anaemia require no therapy. Observation is recommended.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [50]McLornan DP, Psaila B, Ewing J, et al. The management of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):136-50. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19186 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037886?tool=bestpractice.com
Asymptomatic leukocytosis with a normal serum uric acid level or thrombocytosis requires no therapy.
Enrolment in a clinical trial should be considered for all patients with PMF.
folic acid
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
A trial of oral folic acid may be reasonable for patients with anaemia.
Primary options
folic acid: 1 mg orally once daily
allopurinol
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Allopurinol can be given for 2-3 days to patients with hyperuricaemia.
Primary options
allopurinol: 600-800 mg/day orally given in 2-3 divided doses
lower risk: symptomatic
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor or peginterferon alfa
Symptoms and their severity/burden should be assessed at diagnosis and at each clinical review using a validated tool (e.g., Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form total symptom score [MPN-SAF TSS]).[39]McLornan DP, Godfrey AL, Green A, et al. Diagnosis and evaluation of prognosis of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):127-35. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19164 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37932932?tool=bestpractice.com [42]Emanuel RM, Dueck AC, Geyer HL, et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) symptom assessment form total symptom score: prospective international assessment of an abbreviated symptom burden scoring system among patients with MPNs. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 20;30(33):4098-103. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2012.42.3863 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23071245?tool=bestpractice.com
A validated prognostic scoring system can be used for prognostication and risk stratification (e.g., International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS]; Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System [DIPSS]; Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System-plus [DIPSS-plus]; Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score System for Transplantation-Age Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis [MIPSS70]; Mutation and Karyotype-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis [MIPSS70-plus]; Genetically Inspired Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis [GIPSS]).[11]Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010 Mar 4;115(9):1703-8. http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/cgi/content/full/115/9/1703 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20008785?tool=bestpractice.com [13]Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, et al. MIPSS70+ version 2.0: mutation and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 10;36(17):1769-70. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9867 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708808?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009 Mar 26;113(13):2895-901. http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/113/13/2895.full.pdf+html http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18988864?tool=bestpractice.com [44]Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 1;29(4):392-7. http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2446 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21149668?tool=bestpractice.com [45]Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Rotunno G, et al. MIPSS70: mutation-enhanced international prognostic score system for transplantation-age patients with primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;36(4):310-8. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2017.76.4886 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29226763?tool=bestpractice.com [46]Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Nicolosi M, et al. GIPSS: genetically inspired prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018 Jul;32(7):1631-42. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-018-0107-z http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654267?tool=bestpractice.com
Symptomatic lower-risk patients (e.g., DIPSS score ≤2; MIPSS70 score ≤3) may require treatment with a Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor or peginterferon alfa-2a.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [50]McLornan DP, Psaila B, Ewing J, et al. The management of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):136-50. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19186 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037886?tool=bestpractice.com [51]Vannucchi AM, Barbui T, Cervantes F, et al. Philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(5 suppl):v85-99. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(19)47174-3/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26242182?tool=bestpractice.com
Ruxolitinib (a JAK 1/2 inhibitor) can be used to treat symptomatic splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms (e.g., due to thrombocytosis or leukocytosis).
Ruxolitinib is given continuously. It should be started at a low dose and slowly escalated. When discontinuing ruxolitinib (e.g., due to lack of response) the dose should be tapered to minimise the risk of withdrawal symptoms, rebound leukocytosis and thrombocytosis, and cytokine storm. Abrupt discontinuation should be avoided.
Pegylated interferon can be used to reduce marrow fibrosis and symptomatic splenomegaly, and to improve blood counts.[52]Silver RT, Kiladjian JJ, Hasselbalch HC. Interferon and the treatment of polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia and myelofibrosis. Expert Rev Hematol. 2013 Feb;6(1):49-58. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23373780?tool=bestpractice.com
Alternative JAK inhibitors are useful in specific circumstances, or when a patient is resistant to, or intolerant of, ruxolitinib.[24]Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2023 May;98(5):801-21. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajh.26857 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36680511?tool=bestpractice.com [26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [50]McLornan DP, Psaila B, Ewing J, et al. The management of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):136-50. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19186 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037886?tool=bestpractice.com
Pacritinib, a JAK2 and FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) inhibitor, can be used for patients with a platelet count <50 × 10⁹/L.[53]Mesa RA, Vannucchi AM, Mead A, et al. Pacritinib versus best available therapy for the treatment of myelofibrosis irrespective of baseline cytopenias (PERSIST-1): an international, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2017 May;4(5):e225-36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209752 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28336242?tool=bestpractice.com [54]Mascarenhas J, Hoffman R, Talpaz M, et al. Pacritinib vs best available therapy, including ruxolitinib, in patients with myelofibrosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018 May 1;4(5):652-9. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2674384 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29522138?tool=bestpractice.com
Momelotinib, a JAK1/2 and activin A receptor type 1 (ACVR1) inhibitor, may be considered for patients with anaemia.[55]Mesa RA, Kiladjian JJ, Catalano JV, et al. SIMPLIFY-1: a phase III randomized trial of momelotinib versus ruxolitinib in Janus kinase inhibitor-naïve patients with myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3844-50. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6553796 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28930494?tool=bestpractice.com [56]Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Platzbecker U, et al. Momelotinib versus best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (SIMPLIFY 2): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Feb;5(2):e73-81. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanhae/article/PIIS2352-3026(17)30237-5/abstract http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29275119?tool=bestpractice.com [57]Mesa R, Harrison C, Oh ST, et al. Overall survival in the SIMPLIFY-1 and SIMPLIFY-2 phase 3 trials of momelotinib in patients with myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2022 Sep;36(9):2261-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9417985 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35869266?tool=bestpractice.com
Fedratinib, a JAK2/FLT3 inhibitor, is an option for patients with a platelet count ≥50 × 10⁹/L and splenomegaly.[58]Harrison CN, Schaap N, Vannucchi AM, et al. Janus kinase-2 inhibitor fedratinib in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (JAKARTA-2): a single-arm, open-label, non-randomised, phase 2, multicentre study. Lancet Haematol. 2017 Jul;4(7):e317-24. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28602585?tool=bestpractice.com [59]Harrison CN, Schaap N, Vannucchi AM, et al. Fedratinib in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib: an updated analysis of the JAKARTA2 study using stringent criteria for ruxolitinib failure. Am J Hematol. 2020 Jun;95(6):594-603. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317815 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32129512?tool=bestpractice.com Serious and fatal cases of encephalopathy have been reported with fedratinib. Wernicke's encephalopathy has been reported in patients receiving fedratinib.[73]Harrison CN, Mesa RA, Jamieson C, et al. Case series of potential Wernicke's encephalopathy in patients treated with fedratinib. Blood. 2017 Dec 8;130(1 suppl):4197. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006497119847134 If Wernicke's encephalopathy is suspected, fedratinib should be discontinued immediately and parenteral thiamine initiated. Fedratinib should not be used in patients with thiamine deficiency.
Enrolment in a clinical trial should be considered for all patients with PMF.
Primary options
ruxolitinib: 5-25 mg orally twice daily
More ruxolitinibStarting dose, dose adjustments, and maximum dose depend on platelet count. Consult product literature for further information.
OR
peginterferon alfa 2a: consult specialist for guidance on dose
Secondary options
pacritinib: 200 mg orally twice daily
OR
momelotinib: 200 mg orally once daily
OR
fedratinib: 400 mg orally once daily
consider stem cell transplant
Evaluation for allogeneic HSCT may be considered for selected lower-risk PMF patients with a DIPSS intermediate-1 score or MIPSS70 intermediate score and additional risk factors. Transplantation-related morbidity and mortality are high, so decisions should be individualised.
The Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System (MTSS) may be helpful in assessing risk when considering stem cell transplant.[47]Gagelmann N, Ditschkowski M, Bogdanov R, et al. Comprehensive clinical-molecular transplant scoring system for myelofibrosis undergoing stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2019 May 16;133(20):2233-42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006497120425625?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30760453?tool=bestpractice.com [48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com
higher risk: younger stem cell transplant candidate without comorbidities
myeloablative stem cell transplant
Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant is the only treatment option with curative potential.[48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com [60]Rondelli D, Goldberg JD, Isola L, et al. MPD-RC 101 prospective study of reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2014 Aug 14;124(7):1183-91. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4133490 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24963042?tool=bestpractice.com
Symptoms and their severity/burden should be assessed using a validated tool (e.g., Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form total symptom score [MPN-SAF TSS]).[39]McLornan DP, Godfrey AL, Green A, et al. Diagnosis and evaluation of prognosis of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):127-35. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19164 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37932932?tool=bestpractice.com [42]Emanuel RM, Dueck AC, Geyer HL, et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) symptom assessment form total symptom score: prospective international assessment of an abbreviated symptom burden scoring system among patients with MPNs. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 20;30(33):4098-103. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2012.42.3863 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23071245?tool=bestpractice.com
A validated prognostic scoring system can be used for prognostication and risk stratification (e.g., International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS]; Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System [DIPSS]; Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System-plus [DIPSS-plus]; Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score System for Transplantation-Age Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis [MIPSS70]; Mutation and Karyotype-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis [MIPSS70-plus]; Genetically Inspired Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis [GIPSS]).[11]Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010 Mar 4;115(9):1703-8. http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/cgi/content/full/115/9/1703 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20008785?tool=bestpractice.com [13]Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, et al. MIPSS70+ version 2.0: mutation and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 10;36(17):1769-70. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9867 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708808?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009 Mar 26;113(13):2895-901. http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/113/13/2895.full.pdf+html http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18988864?tool=bestpractice.com [44]Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 1;29(4):392-7. http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2446 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21149668?tool=bestpractice.com [45]Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Rotunno G, et al. MIPSS70: mutation-enhanced international prognostic score system for transplantation-age patients with primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;36(4):310-8. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2017.76.4886 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29226763?tool=bestpractice.com [46]Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Nicolosi M, et al. GIPSS: genetically inspired prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018 Jul;32(7):1631-42. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-018-0107-z http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654267?tool=bestpractice.com
The Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System (MTSS) may be helpful in assessing risk when considering stem cell transplant.[47]Gagelmann N, Ditschkowski M, Bogdanov R, et al. Comprehensive clinical-molecular transplant scoring system for myelofibrosis undergoing stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2019 May 16;133(20):2233-42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006497120425625?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30760453?tool=bestpractice.com [48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com
Higher-risk patients (e.g., DIPSS score >2; MIPSS70 >3) should be considered for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant, if eligible.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [50]McLornan DP, Psaila B, Ewing J, et al. The management of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):136-50. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19186 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037886?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients must be fit enough to undergo the procedure (e.g., based on age and performance status), have manageable comorbidities, and have an acceptable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donor (HLA-matched sibling donors are preferred).[48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com [50]McLornan DP, Psaila B, Ewing J, et al. The management of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):136-50. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19186 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037886?tool=bestpractice.com
Reduced-intensity conditioning and myeloablative conditioning are both options for patients with myelofibrosis. For younger patients with good performance status, a myeloablative conditioning regimen should be considered.[48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com [65]Gagelmann N, Salit RB, Schroeder T, et al. High molecular and cytogenetic risk in myelofibrosis does not benefit from higher intensity conditioning before hematopoietic cell transplantation: an international collaborative analysis. Hemasphere. 2022 Oct;6(10):e784. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529040 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204690?tool=bestpractice.com
High survival rates have been reported for stem cell transplant performed in younger patients (i.e., <50 years of age) with a matched related donor.[60]Rondelli D, Goldberg JD, Isola L, et al. MPD-RC 101 prospective study of reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2014 Aug 14;124(7):1183-91. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4133490 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24963042?tool=bestpractice.com [61]Ballen KK, Shrestha S, Sobocinski KA, et al. Outcome of transplantation for myelofibrosis. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010 Mar;16(3):358-67. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2908949 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19879949?tool=bestpractice.com [62]Kröger N, Holler E, Kobbe G, et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation after reduced-intensity conditioning in patients with myelofibrosis: a prospective, multicenter study of the Chronic Leukemia Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Blood. 2009 Dec 17;114(26):5264-70. http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/cgi/content/full/114/26/5264 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19812383?tool=bestpractice.com
Regular post-transplantation driver mutation monitoring is recommended to detect and treat early relapse with donor lymphocyte infusion.[48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com
Enrolment in a clinical trial should be considered for all patients with PMF.
pre-transplant Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Larger spleen size is associated with higher rates of relapse following transplant. Patients who are candidates for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) with symptomatic splenomegaly or splenomegaly >5 cm below the left costal margin should receive a JAK inhibitor to reduce spleen size and manage symptoms prior to transplant.[48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com
Bridging therapy with ruxolitinib appears to improve post-transplant outcomes among patients who experience clinical improvement with this JAK inhibitor.[84]Kröger N, Sbianchi G, Sirait T, et al. Impact of prior JAK-inhibitor therapy with ruxolitinib on outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: a study of the CMWP of EBMT. Leukemia. 2021 Dec;35(12):3551-60. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632691 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34023851?tool=bestpractice.com [85]Shanavas M, Popat U, Michaelis LC, et al. Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis with prior exposure to Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitors. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Mar;22(3):432-40. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5030817 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26493563?tool=bestpractice.com Fedratinib, pacritinib, momelotinib have shown efficacy in reducing splenomegaly and may be considered for some patients, although there is a lack of evidence on their use before transplantation.[48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients already taking a JAK inhibitor should continue treatment. JAK inhibitor therapy should be gradually stopped before, or shortly after, starting conditioning.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com
Ruxolitinib should be started at a low dose and slowly escalated. When discontinuing ruxolitinib the dose should be tapered to minimise the risk of withdrawal symptoms, rebound leukocytosis and thrombocytosis, and cytokine storm. Abrupt discontinuation should be avoided.
Serious and fatal cases of encephalopathy have been reported with fedratinib. Wernicke's encephalopathy has been reported in patients receiving fedratinib.[73]Harrison CN, Mesa RA, Jamieson C, et al. Case series of potential Wernicke's encephalopathy in patients treated with fedratinib. Blood. 2017 Dec 8;130(1 suppl):4197. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006497119847134 If Wernicke's encephalopathy is suspected, fedratinib should be discontinued immediately and parenteral thiamine initiated. Fedratinib should not be used in patients with thiamine deficiency.
Primary options
ruxolitinib: 5-25 mg orally twice daily
More ruxolitinibStarting dose, dose adjustments, and maximum dose depend on platelet count. Consult product literature for further information.
Secondary options
fedratinib: 400 mg orally once daily
OR
momelotinib: 200 mg orally once daily
OR
pacritinib: 200 mg orally twice daily
higher risk: stem cell transplant candidate >70 years or younger stem cell transplant candidate with comorbidities
non-myeloablative stem cell transplant
Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant is the only treatment option with curative potential.[48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com [60]Rondelli D, Goldberg JD, Isola L, et al. MPD-RC 101 prospective study of reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis. Blood. 2014 Aug 14;124(7):1183-91. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4133490 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24963042?tool=bestpractice.com
Symptoms and their severity/burden should be assessed using a validated tool (e.g., Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form total symptom score [MPN-SAF TSS]).[39]McLornan DP, Godfrey AL, Green A, et al. Diagnosis and evaluation of prognosis of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):127-35. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19164 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37932932?tool=bestpractice.com [42]Emanuel RM, Dueck AC, Geyer HL, et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) symptom assessment form total symptom score: prospective international assessment of an abbreviated symptom burden scoring system among patients with MPNs. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 20;30(33):4098-103. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2012.42.3863 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23071245?tool=bestpractice.com
A validated prognostic scoring system can be used for prognostication and risk stratification (e.g., International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS]; Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System [DIPSS]; Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System-plus [DIPSS-plus]; Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score System for Transplantation-Age Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis [MIPSS70]; Mutation and Karyotype-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis [MIPSS70-plus]; Genetically Inspired Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis [GIPSS]).[11]Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010 Mar 4;115(9):1703-8. http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/cgi/content/full/115/9/1703 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20008785?tool=bestpractice.com [13]Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, et al. MIPSS70+ version 2.0: mutation and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 10;36(17):1769-70. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9867 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708808?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009 Mar 26;113(13):2895-901. http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/113/13/2895.full.pdf+html http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18988864?tool=bestpractice.com [44]Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 1;29(4):392-7. http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2446 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21149668?tool=bestpractice.com [45]Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Rotunno G, et al. MIPSS70: mutation-enhanced international prognostic score system for transplantation-age patients with primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;36(4):310-8. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2017.76.4886 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29226763?tool=bestpractice.com [46]Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Nicolosi M, et al. GIPSS: genetically inspired prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018 Jul;32(7):1631-42. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-018-0107-z http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654267?tool=bestpractice.com
The Myelofibrosis Transplant Scoring System (MTSS) may be helpful in assessing risk when considering stem cell transplant.[47]Gagelmann N, Ditschkowski M, Bogdanov R, et al. Comprehensive clinical-molecular transplant scoring system for myelofibrosis undergoing stem cell transplantation. Blood. 2019 May 16;133(20):2233-42. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006497120425625?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30760453?tool=bestpractice.com [48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com
Higher-risk patients (e.g., DIPSS score >2; MIPSS70 >3) should be considered for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplant, if eligible.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [51]Vannucchi AM, Barbui T, Cervantes F, et al. Philadelphia chromosome-negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015 Sep;26(5 suppl):v85-99. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(19)47174-3/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26242182?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients must be fit enough to undergo the procedure (e.g., based on age and performance status), have manageable comorbidities, and have an acceptable human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched donor (HLA-matched sibling donors are preferred).[48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com [50]McLornan DP, Psaila B, Ewing J, et al. The management of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):136-50. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19186 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037886?tool=bestpractice.com
In patients aged over 70 years, allogeneic HSCT should be considered on an individual basis, balancing patient preferences and disease-associated and patient-associated features.[48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com A reduced-intensity non-myeloablative conditioning regimen is recommended for older patients, and patients with significant comorbidities.[48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com [65]Gagelmann N, Salit RB, Schroeder T, et al. High molecular and cytogenetic risk in myelofibrosis does not benefit from higher intensity conditioning before hematopoietic cell transplantation: an international collaborative analysis. Hemasphere. 2022 Oct;6(10):e784. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9529040 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36204690?tool=bestpractice.com
Studies report promising outcomes for older patients with good performance status after allogeneic HSCT with a suitable donor.[63]Daghia G, Zabelina T, Zeck G, et al. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis patients aged ≥65 years. Eur J Haematol. 2019 Oct;103(4):370-8. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejh.13294 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31306511?tool=bestpractice.com [64]Hernández-Boluda JC, Pereira A, Kröger N, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in older myelofibrosis patients: a study of the chronic malignancies working party of EBMT and the Spanish Myelofibrosis Registry. Am J Hematol. 2021 Oct 1;96(10):1186-94. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajh.26279 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34152630?tool=bestpractice.com
Regular post-transplantation driver mutation monitoring is recommended to detect and treat early relapse with donor lymphocyte infusion.[48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com
Enrolment in a clinical trial should be considered for all patients with PMF.
pre-transplant Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Larger spleen size is associated with higher rates of relapse following transplant. Patients who are candidates for allogeneic HSCT with symptomatic splenomegaly or splenomegaly >5 cm below the left costal margin should receive a JAK inhibitor to reduce spleen size and manage symptoms prior to transplant.[48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com
Bridging therapy with ruxolitinib appears to improve post-transplant outcomes among patients who experience clinical improvement with this JAK inhibitor.[84]Kröger N, Sbianchi G, Sirait T, et al. Impact of prior JAK-inhibitor therapy with ruxolitinib on outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: a study of the CMWP of EBMT. Leukemia. 2021 Dec;35(12):3551-60. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8632691 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34023851?tool=bestpractice.com [85]Shanavas M, Popat U, Michaelis LC, et al. Outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in patients with myelofibrosis with prior exposure to Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitors. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016 Mar;22(3):432-40. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5030817 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26493563?tool=bestpractice.com Fedratinib, pacritinib, momelotinib have shown efficacy in reducing splenomegaly and may be considered for some patients, although there is a lack of evidence on their use before transplantation.[48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients already taking a JAK inhibitor should continue treatment. JAK inhibitor therapy should be gradually stopped before, or shortly after, starting conditioning.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [48]Kröger N, Bacigalupo A, Barbui T, et al. Indication and management of allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in myelofibrosis: updated recommendations by the EBMT/ELN International Working Group. Lancet Haematol. 2024 Jan;11(1):e62-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38061384?tool=bestpractice.com
Ruxolitinib should be started at a low dose and slowly escalated. When discontinuing ruxolitinib the dose should be tapered to minimise the risk of withdrawal symptoms, rebound leukocytosis and thrombocytosis, and cytokine storm. Abrupt discontinuation should be avoided.
Serious and fatal cases of encephalopathy have been reported with fedratinib. Wernicke's encephalopathy has been reported in patients receiving fedratinib.[73]Harrison CN, Mesa RA, Jamieson C, et al. Case series of potential Wernicke's encephalopathy in patients treated with fedratinib. Blood. 2017 Dec 8;130(1 suppl):4197. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006497119847134 If Wernicke's encephalopathy is suspected, fedratinib should be discontinued immediately and parenteral thiamine initiated. Fedratinib should not be used in patients with thiamine deficiency.
Primary options
ruxolitinib: 5-25 mg orally twice daily
More ruxolitinibStarting dose, dose adjustments, and maximum dose depend on platelet count. Consult product literature for further information.
Secondary options
fedratinib: 400 mg orally once daily
OR
momelotinib: 200 mg orally once daily
OR
pacritinib: 200 mg orally twice daily
higher risk: not stem cell transplant candidate
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor
Symptoms and their severity/burden should be assessed at diagnosis and at each clinical review using a validated tool (e.g., Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form total symptom score [MPN-SAF TSS]).[39]McLornan DP, Godfrey AL, Green A, et al. Diagnosis and evaluation of prognosis of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):127-35. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19164 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37932932?tool=bestpractice.com [42]Emanuel RM, Dueck AC, Geyer HL, et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) symptom assessment form total symptom score: prospective international assessment of an abbreviated symptom burden scoring system among patients with MPNs. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 20;30(33):4098-103. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2012.42.3863 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23071245?tool=bestpractice.com
A validated prognostic scoring system can be used for prognostication and risk stratification (e.g., International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS]; Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System [DIPSS]; Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System-plus [DIPSS-plus]; Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score System for Transplantation-Age Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis [MIPSS70]; Mutation and Karyotype-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis [MIPSS70-plus]; Genetically Inspired Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis [GIPSS]).[11]Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010 Mar 4;115(9):1703-8. http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/cgi/content/full/115/9/1703 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20008785?tool=bestpractice.com [13]Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, et al. MIPSS70+ version 2.0: mutation and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 10;36(17):1769-70. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9867 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708808?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009 Mar 26;113(13):2895-901. http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/113/13/2895.full.pdf+html http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18988864?tool=bestpractice.com [44]Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 1;29(4):392-7. http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2446 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21149668?tool=bestpractice.com [45]Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Rotunno G, et al. MIPSS70: mutation-enhanced international prognostic score system for transplantation-age patients with primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;36(4):310-8. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2017.76.4886 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29226763?tool=bestpractice.com [46]Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Nicolosi M, et al. GIPSS: genetically inspired prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018 Jul;32(7):1631-42. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-018-0107-z http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654267?tool=bestpractice.com
Higher-risk patients (e.g., with DIPSS score >2; MIPSS70 >3) who are not suitable for stem cell transplant should undergo treatment to manage symptomatic splenomegaly and/or constitutional symptoms (e.g., due to thrombocytosis or leukocytosis).
Splenomegaly is very common and often the most distressing complication of PMF, leading to mechanical discomfort, inanition (severe weakness and wasting), splenic infarction, portal and pulmonary hypertension, and blood cell sequestration.
Ruxolitinib, a Janus kinase (JAK) 1/2 inhibitor, is recommended for controlling organomegaly and blood counts in PMF.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [50]McLornan DP, Psaila B, Ewing J, et al. The management of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):136-50. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19186 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037886?tool=bestpractice.com It is approved for use in intermediate-risk or high-risk patients. Ruxolitinib is effective in reducing splenomegaly and constitutional symptoms in these patients.[66]Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):799-807. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4822164 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22375971?tool=bestpractice.com [67]Harrison C, Kiladjian JJ, Al-Ali HK, et al. JAK inhibition with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy for myelofibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):787-98. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1110556#t=article http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22375970?tool=bestpractice.com [68]Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, Kiladjian JJ, et al.; COMFORT-II investigators. Three-year efficacy, safety, and survival findings from COMFORT-II, a phase 3 study comparing ruxolitinib with best available therapy for myelofibrosis. Blood. 2013 Dec 12;122(25):4047-53. http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/122/25/4047.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24174625?tool=bestpractice.com [69]Harrison CN, Mesa RA, Kiladjian JJ, et al. Health-related quality of life and symptoms in patients with myelofibrosis treated with ruxolitinib versus best available therapy. Br J Haematol. 2013 Jul;162(2):229-39. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23672349?tool=bestpractice.com [70]Verstovsek S, Mesa RA, Gotlib J, et al. Efficacy, safety and survival with ruxolitinib in patients with myelofibrosis: results of a median 2-year follow-up of COMFORT-I. Haematologica. 2013 Dec;98(12):1865-71. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3856961 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24038026?tool=bestpractice.com Early initiation may improve outcomes, including durable spleen reduction and overall survival.[71]Vannucchi AM, Kantarjian HM, Kiladjian JJ, et al. A pooled analysis of overall survival in COMFORT-I and COMFORT-II, 2 randomized phase III trials of ruxolitinib for the treatment of myelofibrosis. Haematologica. 2015 Sep;100(9):1139-45. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4800694 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26069290?tool=bestpractice.com
Ruxolitinib is given continuously. It should be started at a low dose and slowly escalated. When discontinuing ruxolitinib (e.g., due to lack of response) the dose should be tapered to minimise the risk of withdrawal symptoms, rebound leukocytosis and thrombocytosis, and cytokine storm. Abrupt discontinuation should be avoided.
Fedratinib, a JAK2 and FMS-like tyrosine kinase-3 (FLT3) inhibitor, can be used to control organomegaly and blood counts in PMF.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [50]McLornan DP, Psaila B, Ewing J, et al. The management of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):136-50. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19186 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037886?tool=bestpractice.com It is approved for use in adult patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk primary or secondary (post-polycythaemia vera or post-essential thrombocythaemia) myelofibrosis. Fedratinib is effective in reducing splenomegaly and symptom burden in patients with myelofibrosis who are JAK-inhibitor-naive, or resistant or intolerant to ruxolitinib.[59]Harrison CN, Schaap N, Vannucchi AM, et al. Fedratinib in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib: an updated analysis of the JAKARTA2 study using stringent criteria for ruxolitinib failure. Am J Hematol. 2020 Jun;95(6):594-603. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7317815 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32129512?tool=bestpractice.com [72]Pardanani A, Tefferi A, Masszi T, et al. Updated results of the placebo-controlled, phase III JAKARTA trial of fedratinib in patients with intermediate-2 or high-risk myelofibrosis. Br J Haematol. 2021 Oct;195(2):244-8. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.17727 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34331348?tool=bestpractice.com
Serious and fatal cases of encephalopathy have been reported with fedratinib. Wernicke's encephalopathy has been reported in patients receiving fedratinib.[73]Harrison CN, Mesa RA, Jamieson C, et al. Case series of potential Wernicke's encephalopathy in patients treated with fedratinib. Blood. 2017 Dec 8;130(1 suppl):4197. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006497119847134 If Wernicke's encephalopathy is suspected, fedratinib should be discontinued immediately and parenteral thiamine initiated. Fedratinib should not be used in patients with thiamine deficiency.
Momelotinib, a JAK1/2 and activin A receptor type 1 (ACVR1) inhibitor, is recommended for symptomatic PMF patients with anaemia.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [50]McLornan DP, Psaila B, Ewing J, et al. The management of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):136-50. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19186 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037886?tool=bestpractice.com [55]Mesa RA, Kiladjian JJ, Catalano JV, et al. SIMPLIFY-1: a phase III randomized trial of momelotinib versus ruxolitinib in Janus kinase inhibitor-naïve patients with myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;35(34):3844-50. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6553796 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28930494?tool=bestpractice.com [56]Harrison CN, Vannucchi AM, Platzbecker U, et al. Momelotinib versus best available therapy in patients with myelofibrosis previously treated with ruxolitinib (SIMPLIFY 2): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2018 Feb;5(2):e73-81. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanhae/article/PIIS2352-3026(17)30237-5/abstract http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29275119?tool=bestpractice.com [57]Mesa R, Harrison C, Oh ST, et al. Overall survival in the SIMPLIFY-1 and SIMPLIFY-2 phase 3 trials of momelotinib in patients with myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2022 Sep;36(9):2261-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9417985 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35869266?tool=bestpractice.com It is approved for use in patients with intermediate-risk or high-risk PMF and disease-related anaemia. Momelotinib may be considered if ruxolitinib or other JAK inhibitors are ineffective or not tolerated.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [50]McLornan DP, Psaila B, Ewing J, et al. The management of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):136-50. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19186 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037886?tool=bestpractice.com
Pacritinib may be considered if ruxolitinib and fedratinib are ineffective.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [53]Mesa RA, Vannucchi AM, Mead A, et al. Pacritinib versus best available therapy for the treatment of myelofibrosis irrespective of baseline cytopenias (PERSIST-1): an international, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2017 May;4(5):e225-36. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8209752 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28336242?tool=bestpractice.com
If initial treatment is unsuccessful, an alternative, untried JAK inhibitor or enrolment into a clinical trial should be considered.
Primary options
ruxolitinib: 5-25 mg orally twice daily
More ruxolitinibStarting dose, dose adjustments, and maximum dose depend on platelet count. Consult product literature for further information.
OR
fedratinib: 400 mg orally once daily
OR
momelotinib: 200 mg orally once daily
Secondary options
pacritinib: 200 mg orally twice daily
erythropoietin or danazol or luspatercept or thalidomide or lenalidomide
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Transfusion may be needed for short-term symptomatic relief while optimising treatment.
PMF-associated anaemia may be managed with recombinant erythropoietin therapy if serum erythropoietin (EPO) levels <500 mU/mL.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [78]Hernández-Boluda JC, Correa JG, García-Delgado R, et al. Predictive factors for anemia response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in myelofibrosis. Eur J Haematol. 2017 Apr;98(4):407-14. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28009442?tool=bestpractice.com Erythropoietin therapy is effective and well tolerated when used in combination with ruxolitinib.[79]Crisà E, Cilloni D, Elli EM, et al. The use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents is safe and effective in the management of anaemia in myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib. Br J Haematol. 2018 Sep;182(5):701-4. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjh.15450?sid=nlm%3Apubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29984826?tool=bestpractice.com However, it can cause a reversible increase in splenomegaly or hepatomegaly. Patients most likely to respond are those with a low transfusion requirement.[80]Huang J, Tefferi A. Erythropoiesis stimulating agents have limited therapeutic activity in transfusion-dependent patients with primary myelofibrosis regardless of serum erythropoietin level. Eur J Haematol. 2009 Aug;83(2):154-5. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01266.x http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19366369?tool=bestpractice.com
Danazol or luspatercept can be considered if serum EPO levels ≥500 mU/mL.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [81]Cervantes F, Isola IM, Alvarez-Larrán A, et al. Danazol therapy for the anemia of myelofibrosis: assessment of efficacy with current criteria of response and long-term results. Ann Hematol. 2015 Nov;94(11):1791-6. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00277-015-2435-7 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26122869?tool=bestpractice.com [82]Platzbecker U, Della Porta MG, Santini V, et al. Efficacy and safety of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): interim analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2023 Jul 29;402(10399):373-85. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37311468?tool=bestpractice.com [83]Gerds AT, Harrison C, Kiladjian J-J, et al. Safety and efficacy of luspatercept for the treatment of anemia in patients with myelofibrosis: Results from the ACE-536-MF-001 study. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:7016. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.7016
Further options may include immunomodulatory agents (thalidomide or lenalidomide) with or without prednisolone.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1
Primary options
epoetin alfa: consult specialist for guidance on dose
OR
danazol: consult specialist for guidance on dose
OR
luspatercept: consult specialist for guidance on dose
Secondary options
thalidomide: consult specialist for guidance on dose
OR
lenalidomide: consult specialist for guidance on dose
OR
thalidomide: consult specialist for guidance on dose
or
lenalidomide: consult specialist for guidance on dose
-- AND --
prednisolone: consult specialist for guidance on dose
allopurinol
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Allopurinol is given for 2-3 days to patients with hyperuricaemia.
Primary options
allopurinol: 600-800 mg/day orally given in 2-3 divided doses
local irradiation
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Local irradiation is appropriate for the management of non-pregnant patients with symptomatic extramedullary haematopoiesis in tissues and organs other than the spleen.[24]Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2023 May;98(5):801-21. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajh.26857 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36680511?tool=bestpractice.com
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor
Symptoms and their severity/burden should be assessed at diagnosis and at each clinical review using a validated tool (e.g., Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form total symptom score [MPN-SAF TSS]).[39]McLornan DP, Godfrey AL, Green A, et al. Diagnosis and evaluation of prognosis of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):127-35. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19164 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37932932?tool=bestpractice.com [42]Emanuel RM, Dueck AC, Geyer HL, et al. Myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) symptom assessment form total symptom score: prospective international assessment of an abbreviated symptom burden scoring system among patients with MPNs. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Nov 20;30(33):4098-103. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2012.42.3863 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23071245?tool=bestpractice.com
A validated prognostic scoring system can be used for prognostication and risk stratification (e.g., International Prognostic Scoring System [IPSS]; Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System [DIPSS]; Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System-plus [DIPSS-plus]; Mutation-Enhanced International Prognostic Score System for Transplantation-Age Patients with Primary Myelofibrosis [MIPSS70]; Mutation and Karyotype-Enhanced International Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis [MIPSS70-plus]; Genetically Inspired Prognostic Scoring System for Primary Myelofibrosis [GIPSS]).[11]Passamonti F, Cervantes F, Vannucchi AM, et al. A dynamic prognostic model to predict survival in primary myelofibrosis: a study by the IWG-MRT (International Working Group for Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Research and Treatment). Blood. 2010 Mar 4;115(9):1703-8. http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/cgi/content/full/115/9/1703 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20008785?tool=bestpractice.com [13]Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, et al. MIPSS70+ version 2.0: mutation and karyotype-enhanced international prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 10;36(17):1769-70. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9867 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29708808?tool=bestpractice.com [43]Cervantes F, Dupriez B, Pereira A, et al. New prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis based on a study of the International Working Group for Myelofibrosis Research and Treatment. Blood. 2009 Mar 26;113(13):2895-901. http://bloodjournal.hematologylibrary.org/content/113/13/2895.full.pdf+html http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18988864?tool=bestpractice.com [44]Gangat N, Caramazza D, Vaidya R, et al. DIPSS plus: a refined Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System for primary myelofibrosis that incorporates prognostic information from karyotype, platelet count, and transfusion status. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 1;29(4):392-7. http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2446 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21149668?tool=bestpractice.com [45]Guglielmelli P, Lasho TL, Rotunno G, et al. MIPSS70: mutation-enhanced international prognostic score system for transplantation-age patients with primary myelofibrosis. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;36(4):310-8. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2017.76.4886 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29226763?tool=bestpractice.com [46]Tefferi A, Guglielmelli P, Nicolosi M, et al. GIPSS: genetically inspired prognostic scoring system for primary myelofibrosis. Leukemia. 2018 Jul;32(7):1631-42. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41375-018-0107-z http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29654267?tool=bestpractice.com
Higher-risk patients (e.g., with DIPSS score >2; MIPSS70 >3) who are not suitable for stem cell transplant should undergo treatment to manage symptomatic splenomegaly and/or constitutional symptoms (e.g., due to thrombocytosis or leukocytosis).
Splenomegaly is very common and often the most distressing complication of PMF, leading to mechanical discomfort, inanition (severe weakness and wasting), splenic infarction, portal and pulmonary hypertension, and blood cell sequestration.
Pacritinib, a JAK2/FLT3 inhibitor, is the preferred option for higher-risk patients without thrombocytosis.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 It is approved for the treatment of intermediate- or high-risk PMF in patients with a platelet count <50 × 10⁹/L (<50,000/microlitre). Pacritinib is effective in reducing splenomegaly and symptom burden in patients with myelofibrosis (including those with severe cytopenias).[54]Mascarenhas J, Hoffman R, Talpaz M, et al. Pacritinib vs best available therapy, including ruxolitinib, in patients with myelofibrosis: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2018 May 1;4(5):652-9. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2674384 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29522138?tool=bestpractice.com
Momelotinib, a JAK1/2 and activin A receptor type 1 (ACVR1) inhibitor, may be considered as an alternative option for higher-risk patients without thrombocytosis.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1
If initial treatment is unsuccessful, an alternative, untried JAK inhibitor or enrolment into a clinical trial should be considered.
Primary options
pacritinib: 200 mg orally twice daily
Secondary options
momelotinib: 200 mg orally once daily
erythropoietin or danazol or luspatercept or thalidomide or lenalidomide
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Transfusion may be needed for short-term symptomatic relief while optimising treatment.
PMF-associated anaemia may be managed with recombinant erythropoietin therapy if serum erythropoietin (EPO) levels <500 mU/mL.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [78]Hernández-Boluda JC, Correa JG, García-Delgado R, et al. Predictive factors for anemia response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in myelofibrosis. Eur J Haematol. 2017 Apr;98(4):407-14. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28009442?tool=bestpractice.com Erythropoietin therapy is effective and well tolerated when used in combination with ruxolitinib.[79]Crisà E, Cilloni D, Elli EM, et al. The use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents is safe and effective in the management of anaemia in myelofibrosis patients treated with ruxolitinib. Br J Haematol. 2018 Sep;182(5):701-4. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjh.15450?sid=nlm%3Apubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29984826?tool=bestpractice.com However, it can cause a reversible increase in splenomegaly or hepatomegaly. Patients most likely to respond are those with a low transfusion requirement.[80]Huang J, Tefferi A. Erythropoiesis stimulating agents have limited therapeutic activity in transfusion-dependent patients with primary myelofibrosis regardless of serum erythropoietin level. Eur J Haematol. 2009 Aug;83(2):154-5. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01266.x http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19366369?tool=bestpractice.com
Danazol or luspatercept can be considered if serum EPO levels ≥500 mU/mL.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [81]Cervantes F, Isola IM, Alvarez-Larrán A, et al. Danazol therapy for the anemia of myelofibrosis: assessment of efficacy with current criteria of response and long-term results. Ann Hematol. 2015 Nov;94(11):1791-6. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00277-015-2435-7 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26122869?tool=bestpractice.com [82]Platzbecker U, Della Porta MG, Santini V, et al. Efficacy and safety of luspatercept versus epoetin alfa in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent-naive, transfusion-dependent, lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (COMMANDS): interim analysis of a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2023 Jul 29;402(10399):373-85. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37311468?tool=bestpractice.com [83]Gerds AT, Harrison C, Kiladjian J-J, et al. Safety and efficacy of luspatercept for the treatment of anemia in patients with myelofibrosis: Results from the ACE-536-MF-001 study. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41:7016. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.7016
Further options may include immunomodulatory agents (thalidomide or lenalidomide) with or without prednisolone.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1
Primary options
epoetin alfa: consult specialist for guidance on dose
OR
danazol: consult specialist for guidance on dose
OR
luspatercept: consult specialist for guidance on dose
Secondary options
thalidomide: consult specialist for guidance on dose
OR
lenalidomide: consult specialist for guidance on dose
OR
thalidomide: consult specialist for guidance on dose
or
lenalidomide: consult specialist for guidance on dose
-- AND --
prednisolone: consult specialist for guidance on dose
allopurinol
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Allopurinol is given for 2-3 days to patients with hyperuricaemia.
Primary options
allopurinol: 600-800 mg/day orally given in 2-3 divided doses
local irradiation
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Local irradiation is appropriate for the management of non-pregnant patients with symptomatic extramedullary haematopoiesis in tissues and organs other than the spleen.[24]Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2023 May;98(5):801-21. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajh.26857 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36680511?tool=bestpractice.com
splenectomy or splenic irradiation
Non-pharmacological measures, such as splenectomy or splenic irradiation, are no longer widely used for PMF.
Splenectomy may be an option if pharmacological agents are ineffective in patients with severe symptomatic splenomegaly (e.g., with splenic abdominal pain, symptomatic portal hypertension, frequent red blood cell transfusions).[24]Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2023 May;98(5):801-21. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajh.26857 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36680511?tool=bestpractice.com [50]McLornan DP, Psaila B, Ewing J, et al. The management of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):136-50. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19186 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037886?tool=bestpractice.com [74]Polverelli N, Mauff K, Kröger N, et al. Impact of spleen size and splenectomy on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: a retrospective analysis by the chronic malignancies working party on behalf of European society for blood and marrow transplantation (EBMT). Am J Hematol. 2021 Jan;96(1):69-79. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajh.26020 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33064301?tool=bestpractice.com Splenectomy may also be used in some patients with extreme splenomegaly prior to transplant.[50]McLornan DP, Psaila B, Ewing J, et al. The management of myelofibrosis: a British Society for Haematology Guideline. Br J Haematol. 2024 Jan;204(1):136-50. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bjh.19186 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38037886?tool=bestpractice.com [74]Polverelli N, Mauff K, Kröger N, et al. Impact of spleen size and splenectomy on outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for myelofibrosis: a retrospective analysis by the chronic malignancies working party on behalf of European society for blood and marrow transplantation (EBMT). Am J Hematol. 2021 Jan;96(1):69-79. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajh.26020 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33064301?tool=bestpractice.com
Splenectomy is a high-risk procedure with potential complications such as bleeding (the greatest risk), postoperative thrombosis, infection, abdominal hernia, and difficult-to-control myeloproliferation with hepatomegaly; therefore, the decision to perform splenectomy requires careful consideration. Splenectomy for patients with PMF is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates (approximately 9% and 30%, respectively) with limited survival benefit.[24]Tefferi A. Primary myelofibrosis: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management. Am J Hematol. 2023 May;98(5):801-21. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajh.26857 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36680511?tool=bestpractice.com [75]Tefferi A, Mesa RA, Nagorney DM, et al. Splenectomy in myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia: a single-institution experience with 223 patients. Blood. 2000 Apr 1;95(7):2226-33. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006497120641805?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10733489?tool=bestpractice.com
Splenic irradiation (e.g., with external-beam radiation therapy) can be effective at alleviating splenic pain and temporarily reducing spleen size.[76]Elliott MA, Chen MG, Silverstein MN, et al. Splenic irradiation for symptomatic splenomegaly associated with myelofibrosis with myeloid metaplasia. Br J Haematol. 1998 Nov;103(2):505-11. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1046/j.1365-2141.1998.00998.x/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9827926?tool=bestpractice.com [77]Bouabdallah R, Coso D, Gonzague-Casabianca L, et al. Safety and efficacy of splenic irradiation in the treatment of patients with idiopathic myelofibrosis: a report on 15 patients. Leuk Res. 2000 Jun;24(6):491-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10781683?tool=bestpractice.com However, its use should be restricted to patients unsuitable for splenectomy because there is an unpredictable risk of severe cytopenias.
individualised care
PMF in pregnancy is rare. Patients who become pregnant should be under the joint care of a haematologist and an obstetrician experienced in high-risk care. Treatment should be individualised.
Peginterferon alfa-2a may be considered for pregnant patients. Use can be limited by its induction of leukopenia or thrombocytopenia, but it can decrease splenomegaly. There is a lack of data for the use of peginterferon alfa-2a in pregnancy; it should be used only if the benefits outweigh the potential risk to the fetus.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1
Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, hydroxycarbamide, and thalidomide are contraindicated in pregnancy.
Primary options
peginterferon alfa 2a: consult specialist for guidance on dose
erythropoietin
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
PMF-associated anaemia may be managed with recombinant erythropoietin therapy if serum erythropoietin (EPO) levels <500 mU/mL.[26]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: myeloproliferative neoplasms [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [78]Hernández-Boluda JC, Correa JG, García-Delgado R, et al. Predictive factors for anemia response to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents in myelofibrosis. Eur J Haematol. 2017 Apr;98(4):407-14. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28009442?tool=bestpractice.com However, it can cause a reversible increase in splenomegaly or hepatomegaly. Patients most likely to respond are those with a low transfusion requirement.[80]Huang J, Tefferi A. Erythropoiesis stimulating agents have limited therapeutic activity in transfusion-dependent patients with primary myelofibrosis regardless of serum erythropoietin level. Eur J Haematol. 2009 Aug;83(2):154-5. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01266.x http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19366369?tool=bestpractice.com
Specialist consultation is advised in pregnant women.
Primary options
epoetin alfa: consult specialist for guidance on dose
allopurinol
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Allopurinol should be considered if the benefit of treating the hyperuricaemia outweighs the risk of hyperuricaemia to the mother and child and no other safe alternatives are available.
Given for 2-3 days.
Primary options
allopurinol: 600-800 mg/day orally given in 2-3 divided doses
Choose a patient group to see our recommendations
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups. See disclaimer
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer