All patients are treated with empiric and subsequent culture-directed definitive antibiotic therapy. For patients with neurologic deficit, decompressive surgery is essential. In these patients, the single most important predictor of the final neurologic outcome is the patient's neurologic status immediately before decompressive surgery.[30]Sendi P, Bregenzer T, Zimmerli W. Spinal epidural abscess in clinical practice. QJM. 2008 Jan;101(1):1-12.
http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/101/1/1.full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17982180?tool=bestpractice.com
Transfer patients with suspected spinal epidural abscess (SEA) to a higher level of care. This may be required to obtain imaging studies (e.g., contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or computed tomography [CT] myelogram), and access to a spine surgeon for removal of SEA.
Medical management versus surgical management
There is debate about the merits of medical versus surgical management for patients with SEA without neurologic deficit, and evidence is limited. There has been a move towards increased use of medical management for this population, but it is important to select patients carefully.[9]Sharfman ZT, Gelfand Y, Shah P, et al. Spinal epidural abscess: a review of presentation, management, and medicolegal implications. Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):742-59.
https://www.asianspinejournal.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.31616/asj.2019.0369
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32718133?tool=bestpractice.com
[30]Sendi P, Bregenzer T, Zimmerli W. Spinal epidural abscess in clinical practice. QJM. 2008 Jan;101(1):1-12.
http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/101/1/1.full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17982180?tool=bestpractice.com
[41]Gardner WT, Rehman H, Frost A. Spinal epidural abscesses: the role for non-operative management – a systematic review. Surgeon. 2021 Aug;19(4):226-37.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32684428?tool=bestpractice.com
[42]Arko L 4th, Quach E, Nguyen V, et al. Medical and surgical management of spinal epidural abscess: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2014 Aug;37(2):E4.
https://thejns.org/focus/view/journals/neurosurg-focus/37/2/article-pE4.xml
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25081964?tool=bestpractice.com
[43]Suppiah S, Meng Y, Fehlings MG, et al. How best to manage the spinal epidural abscess? A current systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;93:20-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27262655?tool=bestpractice.com
Factors that may increase the risk of treatment failure of medical management include: MRSA as the causative organism; diabetes mellitus; cervical or thoracic SEA; history of intravenous drug use; age >50 years; C-reactive protein (CRP) level >115 mg/L; white blood cell (WBC) count >12.5 cells/mm³.[6]Turner A, Zhao L, Gauthier P, et al. Management of cervical spine epidural abscess: a systematic review. Ther Adv Infect Dis. 2019 Jul 19;6:.2049936119863940
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6643182
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31367375?tool=bestpractice.com
[9]Sharfman ZT, Gelfand Y, Shah P, et al. Spinal epidural abscess: a review of presentation, management, and medicolegal implications. Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):742-59.
https://www.asianspinejournal.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.31616/asj.2019.0369
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32718133?tool=bestpractice.com
Antibiotic therapy
Antibiotic therapy should be started without delay, as soon as cultures from blood, purulent material, and other possible sources of infection have been obtained.[2]Bond A, Manian FA. Spinal epidural abscess: a review with special emphasis on earlier diagnosis. Biomed Res Int. 2016 Dec 1 [Epub ahead of print].
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2016/1614328
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28044125?tool=bestpractice.com
[28]Long B, Carlson J, Montrief T, et al. High risk and low prevalence diseases: spinal epidural abscess. Am J Emerg Med. 2022 Mar;53:168-72.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35063888?tool=bestpractice.com
Empiric therapy
Empiric antibiotic therapy should be started and continued until the causative agent is identified. Every attempt to obtain bacteriologic specimens should be completed first. Antibiotics include agents active against Staphylococcus aureus, including MRSA, streptococci, and aerobic gram-negative organisms.[2]Bond A, Manian FA. Spinal epidural abscess: a review with special emphasis on earlier diagnosis. Biomed Res Int. 2016 Dec 1 [Epub ahead of print].
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2016/1614328
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28044125?tool=bestpractice.com
[30]Sendi P, Bregenzer T, Zimmerli W. Spinal epidural abscess in clinical practice. QJM. 2008 Jan;101(1):1-12.
http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/101/1/1.full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17982180?tool=bestpractice.com
[44]Pradilla G, Ardila GP, Hsu W, et al. Epidural abscesses of the CNS. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Mar;8(3):292-300.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19233039?tool=bestpractice.com
A suggested regimen is vancomycin plus either a third- or fourth-generation cephalosporin (e.g., cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, or ceftazidime) or piperacillin/tazobactam. In patients at high risk of Pseudomonas species infection (e.g., history of intravenous drug use), ceftazidime, cefepime, or piperacillin/tazobactam is recommended.[2]Bond A, Manian FA. Spinal epidural abscess: a review with special emphasis on earlier diagnosis. Biomed Res Int. 2016 Dec 1 [Epub ahead of print].
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2016/1614328
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28044125?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with risk factors for fungal SEA should also receive an antifungal agent such as voriconazole or amphotericin B.[2]Bond A, Manian FA. Spinal epidural abscess: a review with special emphasis on earlier diagnosis. Biomed Res Int. 2016 Dec 1 [Epub ahead of print].
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2016/1614328
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28044125?tool=bestpractice.com
Definitive therapy
Identification and prompt treatment of the causative organism is paramount. The definitive choice of antibiotic depends on the results of microbiologic culture and susceptibility testing. Once the etiologic agent is identified, treatment is tailored to the sensitivity of the specific strain if possible.[2]Bond A, Manian FA. Spinal epidural abscess: a review with special emphasis on earlier diagnosis. Biomed Res Int. 2016 Dec 1 [Epub ahead of print].
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2016/1614328
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28044125?tool=bestpractice.com
[30]Sendi P, Bregenzer T, Zimmerli W. Spinal epidural abscess in clinical practice. QJM. 2008 Jan;101(1):1-12.
http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/101/1/1.full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17982180?tool=bestpractice.com
Total duration of antibiotic treatment varies from 4 weeks to 16 weeks, depending on several factors such as comorbidities and concurrent presence of vertebral osteomyelitis.[2]Bond A, Manian FA. Spinal epidural abscess: a review with special emphasis on earlier diagnosis. Biomed Res Int. 2016 Dec 1 [Epub ahead of print].
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2016/1614328
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28044125?tool=bestpractice.com
Most patients receive a minimum of 2 to 4 weeks of parenteral antibiotics, which may be extended if vertebral osteomyelitis is suspected.[2]Bond A, Manian FA. Spinal epidural abscess: a review with special emphasis on earlier diagnosis. Biomed Res Int. 2016 Dec 1 [Epub ahead of print].
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2016/1614328
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28044125?tool=bestpractice.com
[9]Sharfman ZT, Gelfand Y, Shah P, et al. Spinal epidural abscess: a review of presentation, management, and medicolegal implications. Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):742-59.
https://www.asianspinejournal.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.31616/asj.2019.0369
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32718133?tool=bestpractice.com
[30]Sendi P, Bregenzer T, Zimmerli W. Spinal epidural abscess in clinical practice. QJM. 2008 Jan;101(1):1-12.
http://qjmed.oxfordjournals.org/content/101/1/1.full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17982180?tool=bestpractice.com
This will be followed by oral antibiotics.
Antibiotic regimens for methicillin-sensitive S aureus infection most commonly include nafcillin or a first-generation cephalosporin (e.g., cefazolin).
Antibiotic treatment of choice for MRSA infection is vancomycin. Some experts recommend adding rifampin to vancomycin.[45]Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Feb 1;52(3):e18-55.
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/52/3/e18/306145
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21208910?tool=bestpractice.com
Second-line options include trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole and linezolid.[45]Liu C, Bayer A, Cosgrove SE, et al. Clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases of America for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections in adults and children. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Feb 1;52(3):e18-55.
https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/52/3/e18/306145
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21208910?tool=bestpractice.com
[46]Brown NM, Goodman AL, Horner C, et al. Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): updated guidelines from the UK. JAC Antimicrob Resist. 2021 Mar;3(1):dlaa114.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8210269
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223066?tool=bestpractice.com
These may be used due to vancomycin allergy/intolerance or if there is a need to switch to an oral antibiotic earlier than planned (e.g., due to social reasons, patient’s refusal to receive intravenous antibiotics, or lack of intravenous access).
Antibiotic therapy for infection with aerobic gram-negative bacilli is usually a third- or fourth-generation cephalosporin (e.g., cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, cefepime, or ceftazidime) or piperacillin/tazobactam. When Pseudomonas species infection is suspected, cefepime, ceftazidime, or piperacillin/tazobactam is recommended.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: patients should receive 6 months to 1 year of appropriate antituberculous therapy. See Pulmonary tuberculosis and HIV-related opportunistic infections.
Monitoring
Throughout the course of antibiotic treatment, the patient should be monitored at least every 2 weeks for evidence of refractory infection. Serial monitoring of WBC count, CRP, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) is recommended to assess treatment response.[9]Sharfman ZT, Gelfand Y, Shah P, et al. Spinal epidural abscess: a review of presentation, management, and medicolegal implications. Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):742-59.
https://www.asianspinejournal.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.31616/asj.2019.0369
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32718133?tool=bestpractice.com
[47]Yoon SH, Chung SK, Kim KJ, et al. Pyogenic vertebral osteomyelitis: identification of microorganism and laboratory markers used to predict clinical outcome. Eur Spine J. 2010 Apr;19(4):575-82.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2899831
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19937064?tool=bestpractice.com
Rising WBC count, CRP, or ESR may suggest treatment failure. In these patients, imaging with enhanced MRI of the whole spine should be repeated to evaluate any residual spinal infection. If MRI shows an enhancing bone/epidural space, repeat cultures should be taken and alternative antibiotic agents considered, based on in vitro microbial susceptibility testing. MRI should also be repeated if new symptoms of concern (e.g., back pain, weakness, or paresthesia) develop.[9]Sharfman ZT, Gelfand Y, Shah P, et al. Spinal epidural abscess: a review of presentation, management, and medicolegal implications. Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):742-59.
https://www.asianspinejournal.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.31616/asj.2019.0369
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32718133?tool=bestpractice.com
[48]Sevinç F, Prins JM, Koopmans RP, et al. Early switch from intravenous to oral antibiotics: guidelines and implementation in a large teaching hospital. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1999 Apr;43(4):601-6.
http://jac.oxfordjournals.org/content/43/4/601.full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10350396?tool=bestpractice.com
Surgical consultation should be sought for these patients.[12]Reihsaus E, Waldbaur H, Seeling W. Spinal epidural abscess: a meta-analysis of 915 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2000 Dec;23(4):175-204.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11153548?tool=bestpractice.com
[42]Arko L 4th, Quach E, Nguyen V, et al. Medical and surgical management of spinal epidural abscess: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2014 Aug;37(2):E4.
https://thejns.org/focus/view/journals/neurosurg-focus/37/2/article-pE4.xml
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25081964?tool=bestpractice.com
[43]Suppiah S, Meng Y, Fehlings MG, et al. How best to manage the spinal epidural abscess? A current systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;93:20-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27262655?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with underlying comorbidities (e.g., diabetes mellitus, intravenous drug use, HIV infection) or with preexisting systemic infections (e.g., infective endocarditis) are at greater risk of chronic spinal infection. In such patients, resistant or unusual pathogens (e.g., fungi) should also be considered.[49]Wang J, Calhoun JH, Mader JT. The application of bioimplants in the management of chronic osteomyelitis. Orthopedics. 2002 Nov;25(11):1247-52.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12452341?tool=bestpractice.com
[50]Özdemir N, Çelik L, Oguzoglu S, et al. Cervical vertebral osteomyelitis and epidural abscess caused by Candida albicans in a patient with chronic renal failure. Turk Neurosurg. 2008 Apr;18(2):207-10.
http://www.turkishneurosurgery.org.tr/pdf/pdf_JTN_581.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18597241?tool=bestpractice.com
Medical therapy can be associated with moderately high failure rates and close observation is needed, especially for patients with cervical spine lesions.[9]Sharfman ZT, Gelfand Y, Shah P, et al. Spinal epidural abscess: a review of presentation, management, and medicolegal implications. Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):742-59.
https://www.asianspinejournal.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.31616/asj.2019.0369
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32718133?tool=bestpractice.com
[42]Arko L 4th, Quach E, Nguyen V, et al. Medical and surgical management of spinal epidural abscess: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2014 Aug;37(2):E4.
https://thejns.org/focus/view/journals/neurosurg-focus/37/2/article-pE4.xml
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25081964?tool=bestpractice.com
[43]Suppiah S, Meng Y, Fehlings MG, et al. How best to manage the spinal epidural abscess? A current systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;93:20-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27262655?tool=bestpractice.com
[51]Alton TB, Patel AR, Bransford RJ, et al. Is there a difference in neurologic outcome in medical versus early operative management of cervical epidural abscesses? Spine J. 2015 Jan 1;15(1):10-7.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24937797?tool=bestpractice.com
Surgical treatment
Surgery is indicated when the patient presents with progressive neurologic deficit or does not respond to antibiotic therapy.[9]Sharfman ZT, Gelfand Y, Shah P, et al. Spinal epidural abscess: a review of presentation, management, and medicolegal implications. Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):742-59.
https://www.asianspinejournal.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.31616/asj.2019.0369
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32718133?tool=bestpractice.com
[14]Lenga P, Gülec G, Bajwa AA, et al. Decompression only versus fusion in octogenarians with spinal epidural abscesses: early complications, clinical and radiological outcome with 2-year follow-up. Neurosurg Rev. 2022 Aug;45(4):2877-85.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10143-022-01805-4
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536406?tool=bestpractice.com
[15]Lenga P, Gülec G, Bajwa AA, et al. Surgical management of spinal epidural abscess in elderly patients: a comparative analysis between patients 65-79 years and ≥80 years with 3-year follow-up. World Neurosurg. 2022 Nov;167:e795-805.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36041723?tool=bestpractice.com
[16]Chen M, Baumann AN, Fraiman ET, et al. Long-term survivability of surgical and nonsurgical management of spinal epidural abscess. Spine J. 2024 May;24(5):748-58.
https://www.thespinejournalonline.com/article/S1529-9430(24)00002-0/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38211902?tool=bestpractice.com
[43]Suppiah S, Meng Y, Fehlings MG, et al. How best to manage the spinal epidural abscess? A current systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;93:20-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27262655?tool=bestpractice.com
[44]Pradilla G, Ardila GP, Hsu W, et al. Epidural abscesses of the CNS. Lancet Neurol. 2009 Mar;8(3):292-300.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19233039?tool=bestpractice.com
[52]Azad TD, Kalluri AL, Jiang K, et al. External validation of predictive models for failed medical management of spinal epidural abscess. World Neurosurg. 2024 Jul;187:e638-48.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38692569?tool=bestpractice.com
[53]Xiong GX, Nguyen A, Hering K, et al. Long-term quality of life and functional outcomes after management of spinal epidural abscess. Spine J. 2024 May;24(5):759-67.
https://www.thespinejournalonline.com/article/S1529-9430(23)03540-4/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38072087?tool=bestpractice.com
The type of surgical approach is guided in part by the imaging results. Surgery is usually performed with an open technique allowing for cord decompression, epidural irrigation, and sampling of the tissues for microbial diagnosis. For example, a focal posteriorly placed collection will yield to a single- or double-level laminectomy. For patients with less disabling symptoms, CT-guided needle aspiration of intradiscal/intra-osseous lesions may be performed.
One study reported a 30-day mortality rate after surgery for SEA of 3.7%, with most deaths occurring within 2 weeks of surgery. Independent risk factors for mortality included older age, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, respiratory comorbidities, renal comorbidities, metastatic cancer, and thrombocytopenia.[13]Du JY, Schell AJ, Kim CY, et al. 30-day mortality following surgery for spinal epidural abscess: incidence, risk factors, predictive algorithm, and associated complications. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Apr 15;44(8):E500-09.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30234819?tool=bestpractice.com
Another study identified five prognostic predictors of 30-day reoperation after surgery for SEA: cervical spine abscess, preoperative urinary incontinence, ventral location of abscess relative to thecal sac, preoperative wound infection, and leukocytosis (WBC >15,000/microL). Albumin levels <2.6 g/dL were also associated with a significant risk of reoperation within 90 days.[54]Kamalapathy PN, Karhade AV, Groot OQ, et al. Predictors of reoperation after surgery for spinal epidural abscess. Spine J. 2022 Nov;22(11):1830-6.
https://www.thespinejournalonline.com/article/S1529-9430(22)00252-2/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35738500?tool=bestpractice.com
While it is recognized that delayed surgery (24-36 hours following onset of neurologic symptoms) is less effective than surgery performed early, it may still be considered for source control or if neurologic symptoms are progressive and there is evidence of cord function.[5]Nussbaum ES, Rigamonti D, Standiford H, et al. Spinal epidural abscess: a report of 40 cases and review. Surg Neurol. 1992 Sep;38(3):225-31.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1359657?tool=bestpractice.com
[55]Hlavin ML, Kaminski HJ, Ross JS, et al. Spinal epidural abscess: a ten-year perspective. Neurosurgery. 1990 Aug;27(2):177-84.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2385333?tool=bestpractice.com
Reviews have emphasized the essential role that timing of surgery can play in outcomes.[2]Bond A, Manian FA. Spinal epidural abscess: a review with special emphasis on earlier diagnosis. Biomed Res Int. 2016 Dec 1 [Epub ahead of print].
https://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2016/1614328
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28044125?tool=bestpractice.com
[9]Sharfman ZT, Gelfand Y, Shah P, et al. Spinal epidural abscess: a review of presentation, management, and medicolegal implications. Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):742-59.
https://www.asianspinejournal.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.31616/asj.2019.0369
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32718133?tool=bestpractice.com
[43]Suppiah S, Meng Y, Fehlings MG, et al. How best to manage the spinal epidural abscess? A current systematic review. World Neurosurg. 2016 Sep;93:20-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27262655?tool=bestpractice.com
[56]Epstein NE. Timing and prognosis of surgery for spinal epidural abscess: a review. Surg Neurol Int. 2015 Oct 8;6(suppl 19):S475-86.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4617026
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26605109?tool=bestpractice.com
Supportive therapy
Correction of hypotension
Patients with evidence of septic shock require correction of hypotension. The aim is to maintain BP >100 mmHg systolic; adequate urine output (0.5 mL/kg/hour); central venous pressure at 8 to 12 mmHg; mean arterial pressure 65 mmHg or more; and central venous saturation (superior vena cava) 70% or more or mixed venous oxygen saturation 65% or more. Treatment consists of central line placement and volume resuscitation. Vasoactive agents are recommended only if hypotension is refractory to adequate volume resuscitation. Consult a specialist for guidance on suitable vasopressor/inotrope regimens. Selection of appropriate vasoactive agents should only take place under critical care supervision, and may vary according to clinician preference and local practice guidelines.
See Shock.
Prevention of venous thromboembolism
Patients at increased risk of thrombosis should be given prophylaxis to prevent venous thromboembolism and possible pulmonary embolism.[57]Kahn SR, Lim W, Dunn AS, et al. Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 suppl):e195S-226S.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278052
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22315261?tool=bestpractice.com
Treatment should begin no later than 72 hours after presentation. Pharmacologic prophylaxis should be used unless contraindicated; nonpharmacologic measures (e.g., graduated compression stockings, intermittent pneumatic compression devices) may be used for patients at high risk for bleeding.[57]Kahn SR, Lim W, Dunn AS, et al. Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2012 Feb;141(2 suppl):e195S-226S.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3278052
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22315261?tool=bestpractice.com
See Venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis.