Thoracolumbar spine trauma
- Overview
- Theory
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Follow up
- Resources
Treatment algorithm
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups: see disclaimer
at the scene: potential vertebral column injuries
ABC + hemorrhage control
All trauma patients should be evaluated based on the principles of Advanced Trauma Life Support®, independent of whether a spinal cord fracture or spinal cord injury is suspected or confirmed.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf Initial evaluation at the scene includes airway maintenance with cervical spinal motion restriction, assessment of breathing and ventilation, assessment of circulation with hemorrhage control, and assessment of disability with appropriate exposure of the patient to inspect for any obvious site of major injury.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf [45]ATLS Subcommittee, American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma, International ATLS Working Group. ATLS® advanced trauma life support: tenth edition. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2018.
Use a hypotensive resuscitation strategy to maintain a target mean arterial blood pressure of 50-65 mmHg if there is ongoing bleeding.[48]Bickell WH, Wall MJ Jr, Pepe PE, et al. Immediate versus delayed fluid resuscitation for hypotensive patients with penetrating torso injuries. N Engl J Med. 1994 Oct 27;331(17):1105-9. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199410273311701 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7935634?tool=bestpractice.com [49]Morrison CA, Carrick MM, Norman MA, et al. Hypotensive resuscitation strategy reduces transfusion requirements and severe postoperative coagulopathy in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock: preliminary results of a randomized controlled trial. J Trauma. 2011 Mar;70(3):652-63. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21610356?tool=bestpractice.com To improve perfusion, mean arterial pressure should be maintained at 85-90 mmHg for the first 7 days after acute spinal cord injury.[73]Blood pressure management after acute spinal cord injury. Neurosurgery. 2002 Mar;50(3 suppl):S58-62. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12431288?tool=bestpractice.com
spinal motion restriction (SMR)
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
SMR should be established and maintained. According to the American College of Surgeons, significant findings during assessment for thoracic or lumbosacral spine injury that necessitate in-line SMR include acutely altered level of consciousness (e.g., GCS <15, evidence of intoxication); midline neck or back pain and/or tenderness; focal neurologic signs and/or symptoms (e.g., numbness or motor weakness); anatomic deformity of the spine; distracting circumstances or injury (e.g., long bone fracture, degloving, or crush injuries, large burns, emotional distress, communication barrier, etc.) or any similar injury that impairs the patient’s ability to contribute to a reliable exam.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf When SMR is indicated in adults, it should be applied to the entire spine due to the risk of noncontiguous injuries. A critical component of SMR is the application of an appropriately sized cervical collar.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf The head, neck, and torso should be kept in alignment by placing the patient on a long backboard, a scoop stretcher, a vacuum mattress, or an ambulance cot.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf [47]Fischer PE, Perina DG, Delbridge TR, et al. Spinal motion restriction in the trauma patient - a joint position statement. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2018 Nov-Dec;22(6):659-61. https://www.doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2018.1481476 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30091939?tool=bestpractice.com A rigid backboard should be used for transport only and every effort should be made to remove the board as soon as possible to minimize the risk of pressure ulcers and unnecessary discomfort.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf
analgesia
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
In the acute phase following spinal cord injury, intravenous morphine is first line for pain relief. Intravenous ketamine is a second-line agent; intranasal ketamine can be used if there is a delay in getting intravenous access.[46]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Spinal injury: assessment and initial management. Feb 2016 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng41
Primary options
morphine sulfate: 2-10 mg intravenously every 3-4 hours when required
Secondary options
ketamine: consult specialist for guidance on dose
fluid/blood replacement
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Usually not due to the spine injury, and other causes should be sought (e.g., hemorrhage, dehydration).
Should be managed with fluid or blood replacement, taking care not to cause fluid overload and pulmonary edema.
fluid/blood replacement ± vasopressor
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
These signs indicate neurogenic shock, which should be managed with fluid/blood replacement, taking care not to cause fluid overload and pulmonary edema. If hypotension persists, vasopressors should be started.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf [45]ATLS Subcommittee, American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma, International ATLS Working Group. ATLS® advanced trauma life support: tenth edition. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2018.
The use of vasopressors should preferably be confined to the intensive care setting, where there are facilities for invasive hemodynamic monitoring.[45]ATLS Subcommittee, American College of Surgeons' Committee on Trauma, International ATLS Working Group. ATLS® advanced trauma life support: tenth edition. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2018. An agent with both alpha- and beta-adrenergic activity is recommended treat both hypotension and bradycardia associated with sympathetic denervation.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf Consult a specialist for guidance on choice and dose of vasopressor.
osteoporotic fracture
percutaneous treatment
Osteoporotic fractures are usually clinically treatable and preventable. A multidisciplinary approach should be used to manage symptoms caused by a vertebral fracture. The pharmacologic agents used reduce the risk of further fracture within 6 to 12 months by 50 to 80%.[79]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Appraisal consultation document: alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene, strontium ranelate and teriparatide for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women (TA161). Feb 2018 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta161/documents/appraisal-consultation-document-alendronate-etidronate-risedronate-raloxifene-strontium-ranelate-and-teriparatide-for-the-secondary-prevention-of-osteoporotic-fragility-fractures-in-postmenopausal-wo2 [80]Huntjens KM, van Geel TA, van den Bergh JP, et al. Fracture liaison service: impact on subsequent nonvertebral fracture incidence and mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Feb 19;96(4):e29. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24553898?tool=bestpractice.com
Early treatment of vertebral fractures is essential; 19% of women with osteoporosis and a recent vertebral fracture will sustain a new vertebral fracture within the next 12 months.[40]Lindsey R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, et al. Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA. 2001 Jan 17;285(3):320-3. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/193469 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11176842?tool=bestpractice.com
It is particularly important to identify individuals with vertebral fractures who are osteopenic rather than osteoporotic, and who may otherwise not be considered for pharmacologic treatment.[81]Arboleya L, Díaz-Curiel M, Del Río L, et al; OSTEOXPRESS study investigators. Prevalence of vertebral fracture in postmenopausal women with lumbar osteopenia using MorphoXpress® (OSTEOXPRESS Study). Aging Clin Exp Res. 2010 Oct-Dec;22(5-6):419-26. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20110769?tool=bestpractice.com
Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are techniques that offer a minimally invasive approach. The main aims of treatment are bone stabilization, prevention of kyphosis, and reduction of pain duration (by stabilizing bony fragments). Balloon kyphoplasty and percutaneous vertebroplasty have both been reported in several studies as safe and effective surgical procedures for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with improvements in pain relief and respiratory function.[82]Ma XL, Xing D, Ma JX, et al. Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty in treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture: grading the evidence through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2012 Sep;21(9):1844-59. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22832872?tool=bestpractice.com [83]Kanayama M, Oha F, Iwata A, et al. Does balloon kyphoplasty improve the global spinal alignment in osteoporotic vertebral fracture? Int Orthop. 2015 Jun;39(6):1137-43. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25787683?tool=bestpractice.com [84]Yokoyama K, Kawanishi M, Yamada M, et al. In not only vertebroplasty but also kyphoplasty, the resolution of vertebral deformities depends on vertebral mobility. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013 Jul;34(7):1474-8. https://www.ajnr.org/content/34/7/1474 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23391839?tool=bestpractice.com [85]Yokoyama K, Kawanishi M, Yamada M, et al. Postoperative change in sagittal balance after kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24(4):744-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25404372?tool=bestpractice.com [86]Tanigawa N, Kariya S, Komemushi A, et al. Added value of percutaneous vertebroplasty: effects on respiratory function. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012 Jan;198(1):W51-4. https://www.ajronline.org/doi/10.2214/AJR.11.6730 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22194515?tool=bestpractice.com However, some studies have questioned the efficacy of vertebral augmentation on outcomes of pain, physical function, and quality of life.[76]Sharif S, Ali MY, Costa F, et al. Vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic spine fractures: WFNS Spine Committee recommendations. J Neurosurg Sci. 2022 Aug;66(4):311-26. https://www.minervamedica.it/en/journals/neurosurgical-sciences/article.php?cod=R38Y2022N04A0311 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153881?tool=bestpractice.com [77]Ebeling PR, Akesson K, Bauer DC, et al. The efficacy and safety of vertebral augmentation: a second ASBMR task force report. J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Jan;34(1):3-21. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30677181?tool=bestpractice.com Serious complications reported with these procedures include cement leakage, pulmonary embolism, osteomyelitis, and epidural cement leak.[43]LeBoff MS, Greenspan SL, Insogna KL, et al. The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2022 Oct;33(10):2049-102. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00198-021-05900-y http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35478046?tool=bestpractice.com
Guidelines vary on whether to perform these procedures. The UK guidelines from the Royal Osteoporosis Society, published in 2022, recommend to consider referral for vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty for hospitalized patients in whom pain is unremitting after 48 hours and severely compromising activities of daily living and mobility in spite of initiation of therapy and acute pain management, and where there is evidence of vertebral body edema on magnetic resonance imaging.[87]Royal Osteoporosis Society. Guidance for the management of symptomatic vertebral fragility fractures. May 2022 [internet publication]. https://pcrmm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/ROS-guidance-on-managing-symptoms-of-vertebral-fractures-2022-_1_.pdf The American College of Radiology (ACR) recommends in its 2022 guidance to consider percutaneous vertebroplasty or percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for pain relief and increased mobility.[88]American College of Radiology. ACR appropriateness criteria: management of vertebral compression fractures. 2022 [internet publication]. https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/70545/Narrative This recommendation is based on a 2014 US multisociety task force of spine interventionalists reporting that percutaneous vertebroplasty and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty could be considered generally interchangeable techniques for these indications.[88]American College of Radiology. ACR appropriateness criteria: management of vertebral compression fractures. 2022 [internet publication]. https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/70545/Narrative [89]Barr JD, Jensen ME, Hirsch JA, et al. Position statement on percutaneous vertebral augmentation: a consensus statement developed by the Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR), American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) and the Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS), American College of Radiology (ACR), American Society of Neuroradiology (ASNR), American Society of Spine Radiology (ASSR), Canadian Interventional Radiology Association (CIRA), and the Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery (SNIS). J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2014 Feb;25(2):171-81. https://www.jvir.org/article/S1051-0443(13)01487-5/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24325929?tool=bestpractice.com A 2019 US multisociety task force of spine interventionalists concluded that routine use of vertebral augmentation is not supported by current evidence. For patients with acutely painful vertebral fractures, the data reviewed by the panel in 2019 demonstrated that percutaneous vertebroplasty provides no demonstrable clinically significant benefit over placebo. There was insufficient evidence to recommend kyphoplasty over nonsurgical management.[77]Ebeling PR, Akesson K, Bauer DC, et al. The efficacy and safety of vertebral augmentation: a second ASBMR task force report. J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Jan;34(1):3-21. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30677181?tool=bestpractice.com These findings are not reflected in the ACR guidance.
Absolute contraindications to percutaneous treatment include septicemia, active osteomyelitis of the target vertebra, infection along the intended trajectory of access, and uncorrectable coagulopathy.[90]American College of Radiology. ACR-ASNR-ASSR-SIR-SNIS practice parameter for the performance of vertebral augmentation. 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/VerebralAug.pdf See Osteoporotic spinal compression fractures.
analgesia
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
The most common analgesia used for musculoskeletal pain includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and/or acetaminophen for mild to moderate pain, while an opioid may be used for severe pain.
NSAIDs should be used with caution in older people because of increased susceptibility to adverse effects such as gastrointestinal bleeding and cardiovascular events.[131]McCarberg BH. NSAIDs in the older patient: balancing benefits and harms. Pain Med. 2013 Dec;14 suppl 1:S43-4. https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article/14/suppl_1/S43/1941495 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24373111?tool=bestpractice.com [132]Davis A, Robson J. The dangers of NSAIDs: look both ways. Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Apr;66(645):172-3. https://bjgp.org/content/66/645/172 The UK guidelines recommend to consider acetaminophen ahead of oral NSAIDs, cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors, or opioids.[87]Royal Osteoporosis Society. Guidance for the management of symptomatic vertebral fragility fractures. May 2022 [internet publication]. https://pcrmm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/ROS-guidance-on-managing-symptoms-of-vertebral-fractures-2022-_1_.pdf
Opioids are recommended only for very short-term use with acute fractures. If used chronically, opioids lose potency, induce dependence, raise risk for addiction, and lead to falls and central sensitization.[43]LeBoff MS, Greenspan SL, Insogna KL, et al. The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2022 Oct;33(10):2049-102. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00198-021-05900-y http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35478046?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
ibuprofen: 400-800 mg orally every 6-8 hours when required, maximum 2400 mg/day
or
diclofenac potassium: 50 mg orally (immediate-release) three times daily when required
-- AND / OR --
acetaminophen: 325-1000 mg orally every 4-6 hours when required, maximum 4000 mg/day
Secondary options
codeine sulfate: 15-60 mg orally every 4-6 hours when required, maximum 360 mg/day
OR
oxycodone: 5-30 mg orally every 4-6 hours when required
deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Appropriate DVT prophylaxis is recommended to prevent DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE).[10]Wendt K, Nau C, Jug M, et al. ESTES recommendation on thoracolumbar spine fractures: January 2023. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1261-75. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00068-023-02247-3 [50]O'Toole JE, Kaiser MG, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: executive summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):2-6. https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fulltext/2019/01000/Congress_of_Neurological_Surgeons_Systematic.1.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202985?tool=bestpractice.com Compression stockings and anticoagulation should be commenced within 72 hours of the initial injury.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf The ACS recommends initiating mechanical prophylaxis (e.g., sequential or pneumatic compression devices and compression stockings) immediately after the injury, if possible, especially for patients with bleeding risk or other contraindications for chemoprophylaxis.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf There is insufficient evidence to recommend a specific regimen of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis to prevent PE (or VTE-associated morbidity and mortality) in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf [50]O'Toole JE, Kaiser MG, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: executive summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):2-6. https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fulltext/2019/01000/Congress_of_Neurological_Surgeons_Systematic.1.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202985?tool=bestpractice.com The duration of chemoprophylaxis should be determined on an individual patient basis taking into account injury severity, mobility status, bleeding risk, and other comorbidities. Chemoprophylaxis should never be continued for longer than 3 months.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf
pressure ulcer prevention
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
There is an extremely high risk of developing pressure ulcers after a spinal cord injury because of a lack of sensation, which leaves patients unaware of the development of a pressure ulcer; a lack of muscle activity below the level of injury; and impaired circulation, which reduces the transfer of oxygen to the skin.
A pressure ulcer may delay the patient's treatment by weeks, and leave a scar that may be permanently vulnerable. Patients should be regularly turned in a safe manner to reduce pressure on any one side, and the skin should be regularly assessed for signs of pressure ulcers. It is usually sufficient to turn the patient 30° side-to-side with appropriate pillow support. Heels should be kept clear of the bed and supported with pillows. Pressure-relieving devices such as dynamic mattresses should not be used if the spinal column is unstable, and they are usually ineffective in preventing pressure sores in patients with spinal cord injury.
Pressure ulcers in children are often caused by pressure from equipment such as braces and splints, as well as lost or forgotten toys in the bed or on the chair cushion.
Patients must never be allowed to sit or lie on a pressure ulcer.[133]London Spinal Cord Injury Centre, National Spinal Cord Injury Board. The management of children with spinal cord injuries - advice for major trauma networks and SCI centres on the development of joint protocols. Jun 2014 [internet publication]. https://res.cloudinary.com/studio-republic/images/v1635686643/Spinal_Cord_Injuries_Advice_for_Development_of_Joint_Protocols/Spinal_Cord_Injuries_Advice_for_Development_of_Joint_Protocols.pdf?_i=AA
bladder care and urethral catheterization
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
The bladder can become flaccid during spinal shock, leading to overdistension, which can cause permanent damage. All patients require a urethral catheter, which should initially be set to free drainage.[133]London Spinal Cord Injury Centre, National Spinal Cord Injury Board. The management of children with spinal cord injuries - advice for major trauma networks and SCI centres on the development of joint protocols. Jun 2014 [internet publication]. https://res.cloudinary.com/studio-republic/images/v1635686643/Spinal_Cord_Injuries_Advice_for_Development_of_Joint_Protocols/Spinal_Cord_Injuries_Advice_for_Development_of_Joint_Protocols.pdf?_i=AA
management of autonomic dysreflexia
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Autonomic dysreflexia is a potentially dangerous condition that can occur in patients with a spinal cord injury affecting T6 or higher, leading to uncontrolled hypertension, which can further lead to seizures, retinal hemorrhage, cerebral hemorrhage, pulmonary edema, myocardial infarction, or renal impairment. The pathophysiologic mechanism involves a stimulus below the level of the lesion, which activates the sympathetic nervous system. The activated sympathetic system cannot be neuromodulated appropriately by the central nervous system, owing to a lack of spinal cord continuity as descending inhibitory signals cannot travel beyond the level of injury.[134]Milligan J, Lee J, McMillan C, et al. Autonomic dysreflexia: recognizing a common serious condition in patients with spinal cord injury. Can Fam Physician. 2012 Aug;58(8):831-5. https://www.cfp.ca/content/58/8/831.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22893332?tool=bestpractice.com
Treatment involves management of the underlying cause of the stimuli, and the use of antihypertensive medication as per local guidelines.
supportive measures
The American College of Surgeons recommends that stable thoracolumbar fractures in patients without neurologic deficits can be safely managed nonoperatively.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf Prolonged bed rest is not indicated for these patients and best practice involves adequate pain control and early ambulation without a brace.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf [74]Bakhsheshian J, Dahdaleh NS, Fakurnejad S, et al. Evidence-based management of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of nonoperative management. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(1):E1. https://www.doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.FOCUS14159 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24981897?tool=bestpractice.com In some cases, the patient may be discharged home with a lumbar brace.
However, limited high-quality evidence demonstrates that early mobilization without an orthosis can lead to similar pain relief, quality of life, and functional outcome for up to 5-10 years, when compared with the use of a thoracolumbar orthosis.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf [95]Urquhart JC, Alrehaili OA, Fisher CG, et al. Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: extended follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing orthosis versus no orthosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jul;27(1):42-7. https://www.doi.org/10.3171/2016.11.SPINE161031 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28409669?tool=bestpractice.com [96]Bailey CS, Urquhart JC, Dvorak MF, et al. Orthosis versus no orthosis for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic injury: a multicenter prospective randomized equivalence trial. Spine J. 2014 Nov 1;14(11):2557-64. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24184649?tool=bestpractice.com [97]Shamji MF, Roffey DM, Young DK, et al. A pilot evaluation of the role of bracing in stable thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Oct;27(7):370-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22907065?tool=bestpractice.com [98]Post RB, Keizer HJ, Leferink VJ, et al. Functional outcome 5 years after non-operative treatment of type A spinal fractures. Eur Spine J. 2006 Apr;15(4):472-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15937675?tool=bestpractice.com [99]Peev N, Zileli M, Sharif S, et al. Indications for nonsurgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures: WFNS Spine Committee recommendations. Neurospine. 2021 Dec;18(4):713-24. https://www.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2142390.195 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35000324?tool=bestpractice.com If an orthosis is applied, it should be noted that external devices tend to become loose over time, and will need adjustments by the clinician.[100]Bucholz RM, Heckman JD. Rockwood and Green's fractures in adults, 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002:1424-34. Upper thoracic fractures: need to include the cervical spine, using a Sternal Occipital Mandibular Immobilizer (SOMI) brace; thoracolumbar junction: need to include sacrum.
Vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty may be an option in patients with intractable pain, or anterior wedging of vertebral body with an intact posterior cortex of vertebral body (this is to avoid cement leakage into spinal canal).[75]Greenberg MS. Handbook of neurosurgery, 6th ed. New York, NY: Thieme New York; 2005:747. However, some studies have questioned the efficacy of vertebral augmentation on outcomes of pain, physical function, and quality of life.[76]Sharif S, Ali MY, Costa F, et al. Vertebral augmentation in osteoporotic spine fractures: WFNS Spine Committee recommendations. J Neurosurg Sci. 2022 Aug;66(4):311-26. https://www.minervamedica.it/en/journals/neurosurgical-sciences/article.php?cod=R38Y2022N04A0311 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36153881?tool=bestpractice.com [77]Ebeling PR, Akesson K, Bauer DC, et al. The efficacy and safety of vertebral augmentation: a second ASBMR task force report. J Bone Miner Res. 2019 Jan;34(1):3-21. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30677181?tool=bestpractice.com Guidelines vary on whether to perform these procedures. Absolute contraindications to percutaneous treatment include septicemia, active osteomyelitis of the target vertebra, infection along the intended trajectory of access, and uncorrectable coagulopathy.[90]American College of Radiology. ACR-ASNR-ASSR-SIR-SNIS practice parameter for the performance of vertebral augmentation. 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Practice-Parameters/VerebralAug.pdf See Osteoporotic spinal compression fractures.
analgesia
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
The most common analgesia used for musculoskeletal pain includes NSAIDs and/or acetaminophen for mild to moderate pain, while an opioid may be used for severe pain.
NSAIDs should be used with caution in older people because of increased susceptibility to adverse effects such as gastrointestinal bleeding and cardiovascular events.[131]McCarberg BH. NSAIDs in the older patient: balancing benefits and harms. Pain Med. 2013 Dec;14 suppl 1:S43-4. https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article/14/suppl_1/S43/1941495 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24373111?tool=bestpractice.com [132]Davis A, Robson J. The dangers of NSAIDs: look both ways. Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Apr;66(645):172-3. https://bjgp.org/content/66/645/172 The UK guidelines recommend to consider acetaminophen ahead of oral NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, or opioids.[87]Royal Osteoporosis Society. Guidance for the management of symptomatic vertebral fragility fractures. May 2022 [internet publication]. https://pcrmm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/ROS-guidance-on-managing-symptoms-of-vertebral-fractures-2022-_1_.pdf
Opioids are recommended only for very short-term use with acute fractures. If used chronically, opioids lose potency, induce dependence, raise risk for addiction, and lead to falls and central sensitization.[43]LeBoff MS, Greenspan SL, Insogna KL, et al. The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2022 Oct;33(10):2049-102. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00198-021-05900-y http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35478046?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
ibuprofen: 400-800 mg orally every 6-8 hours when required, maximum 2400 mg/day
or
diclofenac potassium: 50 mg orally (immediate-release) three times daily when required
-- AND / OR --
acetaminophen: 325-1000 mg orally every 4-6 hours when required, maximum 4000 mg/day
Secondary options
codeine sulfate: 15-60 mg orally every 4-6 hours when required, maximum 360 mg/day
OR
oxycodone: 5-30 mg orally every 4-6 hours when required
DVT prophylaxis
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Appropriate DVT prophylaxis is recommended to prevent DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE).[10]Wendt K, Nau C, Jug M, et al. ESTES recommendation on thoracolumbar spine fractures: January 2023. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1261-75. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00068-023-02247-3 [50]O'Toole JE, Kaiser MG, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: executive summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):2-6. https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fulltext/2019/01000/Congress_of_Neurological_Surgeons_Systematic.1.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202985?tool=bestpractice.com Compression stockings and anticoagulation should be commenced within 72 hours of the initial injury.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf The ACS recommends initiating mechanical prophylaxis (e.g., sequential or pneumatic compression devices and compression stockings) immediately after the injury, if possible, especially for patients with bleeding risk or other contraindications for chemoprophylaxis.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf There is insufficient evidence to recommend a specific regimen of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis to prevent PE (or VTE-associated morbidity and mortality) in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf [50]O'Toole JE, Kaiser MG, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: executive summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):2-6. https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fulltext/2019/01000/Congress_of_Neurological_Surgeons_Systematic.1.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202985?tool=bestpractice.com The duration of chemoprophylaxis should be determined based on an individual patient basis, taking into account injury severity, mobility status, bleeding risk, and other comorbidities. Chemoprophylaxis should never be continued for longer than 3 months.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf
pressure ulcer prevention
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
There is an extremely high risk of developing pressure ulcers after a spinal cord injury because of a lack of sensation, which leaves patients unaware of the development of a pressure ulcer; a lack of muscle activity below the level of injury; and impaired circulation, which reduces the transfer of oxygen to the skin.
A pressure ulcer may delay the patient's treatment by weeks, and leave a scar that may be permanently vulnerable. Patients should be regularly turned in a safe manner to reduce pressure on any one side, and the skin should be regularly assessed for signs of pressure ulcers. It is usually sufficient to turn the patient 30° side-to-side with appropriate pillow support. Heels should be kept clear of the bed and supported with pillows. Pressure-relieving devices such as dynamic mattresses should not be used if the spinal column is unstable, and they are usually ineffective in preventing pressure sores in patients with spinal cord injury.
Pressure ulcers in children are often caused by pressure from equipment such as braces and splints, as well as lost or forgotten toys in the bed or on the chair cushion.
Patients must never be allowed to sit or lie on a pressure ulcer.[133]London Spinal Cord Injury Centre, National Spinal Cord Injury Board. The management of children with spinal cord injuries - advice for major trauma networks and SCI centres on the development of joint protocols. Jun 2014 [internet publication]. https://res.cloudinary.com/studio-republic/images/v1635686643/Spinal_Cord_Injuries_Advice_for_Development_of_Joint_Protocols/Spinal_Cord_Injuries_Advice_for_Development_of_Joint_Protocols.pdf?_i=AA
bladder care and urethral catheterization
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
The bladder can become flaccid during spinal shock, leading to overdistension, which can cause permanent damage. All patients require a urethral catheter, which should initially be set to free drainage.[133]London Spinal Cord Injury Centre, National Spinal Cord Injury Board. The management of children with spinal cord injuries - advice for major trauma networks and SCI centres on the development of joint protocols. Jun 2014 [internet publication]. https://res.cloudinary.com/studio-republic/images/v1635686643/Spinal_Cord_Injuries_Advice_for_Development_of_Joint_Protocols/Spinal_Cord_Injuries_Advice_for_Development_of_Joint_Protocols.pdf?_i=AA
management of autonomic dysreflexia
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Autonomic dysreflexia is a potentially dangerous condition that can occur in patients with a spinal cord injury affecting T6 or higher, leading to uncontrolled hypertension, which can further lead to seizures, retinal hemorrhage, cerebral hemorrhage, pulmonary edema, myocardial infarction, or renal impairment. The pathophysiologic mechanism involves a stimulus below the level of the lesion, which activates the sympathetic nervous system. The activated sympathetic system cannot be neuromodulated appropriately by the central nervous system, owing to a lack of spinal cord continuity as descending inhibitory signals cannot travel beyond the level of injury.[134]Milligan J, Lee J, McMillan C, et al. Autonomic dysreflexia: recognizing a common serious condition in patients with spinal cord injury. Can Fam Physician. 2012 Aug;58(8):831-5. https://www.cfp.ca/content/58/8/831.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22893332?tool=bestpractice.com
Treatment involves management of the underlying cause of the stimuli, and the use of antihypertensive medication as per local guidelines.
non-osteoporotic fracture
surgical intervention
Surgical intervention is advised if there is soft tissue disruption that will not heal with competent ligamentous integrity; significant vertebral damage; documented neurologic deterioration; kyphotic angulation; spinal canal compromise; increasing pain; or increasing malalignment.[50]O'Toole JE, Kaiser MG, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: executive summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):2-6. https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fulltext/2019/01000/Congress_of_Neurological_Surgeons_Systematic.1.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202985?tool=bestpractice.com [56]Sharif S, Zileli M. Introduction to thoracolumbar spine fractures: WFNS Spine Committee recommendations. Neurospine. 2021 Dec;18(4):651-3. https://e-neurospine.org/journal/view.php?doi=10.14245/ns.2143240.620 [100]Bucholz RM, Heckman JD. Rockwood and Green's fractures in adults, 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002:1424-34. The aims of surgery include alignment restoration, deformity correction, neural structure decompression, and achievement of a stable spinal column.
Options include surgical decompression and surgical stabilization (with rods and screws). Long segmental instrumentation should be used at the upper and middle thoracic spine (above T10). At the thoracolumbar junction and the lumbar spine short segmental stabilization is mostly sufficient, with better clinical outcomes.[10]Wendt K, Nau C, Jug M, et al. ESTES recommendation on thoracolumbar spine fractures: January 2023. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1261-75. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00068-023-02247-3 [101]Dobran M, Nasi D, Brunozzi D, et al. Treatment of unstable thoracolumbar junction fractures: short-segment pedicle fixation with inclusion of the fracture level versus long-segment instrumentation. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2016 Oct;158(10):1883-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27541493?tool=bestpractice.com [102]Özbek Z, Özkara E, Önner H, et al. Treatment of unstable thoracolumbar fractures: does fracture-level fixation accelerate the bone healing? World Neurosurg. 2017 Nov;107:362-70. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28803178?tool=bestpractice.com [103]Cankaya D, Balci M, Deveci A, et al. Better life quality and sexual function in men and their female partners with short-segment posterior fixation in the treatment of thoracolumbar junction burst fractures. Eur Spine J. 2016 Apr;25(4):1128-34. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26202101?tool=bestpractice.com Posterior/posterolateral, anterior/anterolateral, or combined posterior and anterior approaches may be used. The posterior approach appears to be more effective than the anterior approach, but further research is required.[116]Xu GJ, Li ZJ, Ma JX, et al. Anterior versus posterior approach for treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2013 Oct;22(10):2176-83. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24013718?tool=bestpractice.com Spinal fusion or “spondylodesis” is defined as a permanent fusion of a motion segment. This can be done through either an anterior or a posterior approach.[10]Wendt K, Nau C, Jug M, et al. ESTES recommendation on thoracolumbar spine fractures: January 2023. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1261-75. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00068-023-02247-3 Meta-analysis suggests that fusion is not necessary when thoracolumbar burst fracture is treated by posterior pedicle screw fixation.[109]Tian NF, Wu YS, Zhang XL, et al. Fusion versus nonfusion for surgically treated thoracolumbar burst fractures: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013 May 21;8(5):e63995. https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0063995 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23704968?tool=bestpractice.com No significant difference was identified between the two groups regarding radiologic outcome, functional outcome, neurologic improvement, and implant failure rate. Furthermore, nonfusion was associated with significantly reduced operative time and blood loss. Other meta-analyses have confirmed thoracolumbar fractures that have been operated with nonfusion short-segment instrumentation have less bleeding, shorter surgical time, and fewer bone graft donor site complications.[110]Diniz JM, Botelho RV. Is fusion necessary for thoracolumbar burst fracture treated with spinal fixation? a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Nov;27(5):584-92. https://thejns.org/spine/view/journals/j-neurosurg-spine/27/5/article-p584.xml http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28777064?tool=bestpractice.com [111]Lan T, Chen Y, Hu SY, et al. Is fusion superior to non-fusion for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fracture? a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Sci. 2017 Sep;22(5):828-33. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28641907?tool=bestpractice.com [112]Chou PH, Ma HL, Wang ST, et al. Fusion may not be a necessary procedure for surgically treated burst fractures of the thoracolumbar and lumbar spines: a follow-up of at least ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Oct 15;96(20):1724-31. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25320199?tool=bestpractice.com
There is evidence to suggest that the use of transpedicular intracorporeal bone grafting (TBG) in the instrumental fixation of unstable thoracolumbar fractures may decrease the failure rate.[107]Ma Y, Li X, Dong J. Is it useful to apply transpedicular intracorporeal bone grafting to unstable thoracolumbar fractures? A systematic review. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012 Dec;154(12):2205-13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23053291?tool=bestpractice.com TBG involves the insertion of cancellous bone grafts into the fracture site after the restoration of anatomic alignment using instrumental fixation. Research suggests that there is no difference between short-segment instrumentation versus long-segment instrumentation for traumatic thoracolumbar spine fractures without neurologic deficit.[108]Cheng LM, Wang JJ, Zeng ZL, et al. Pedicle screw fixation for traumatic fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 May 31;(5):CD009073. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009073.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23728686?tool=bestpractice.com
There is controversy surrounding the specific timing of decompression in patients with thoracolumbar spine fractures and spinal cord injury and whether it has any impact on outcome.[50]O'Toole JE, Kaiser MG, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: executive summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):2-6. https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fulltext/2019/01000/Congress_of_Neurological_Surgeons_Systematic.1.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202985?tool=bestpractice.com Several studies have shown surgical decompression within 24 hours of acute traumatic thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal cord injury is associated with improved neurologic outcomes, as measured by an improvement in motor scores, light touch scores, and pinprick scores, and better American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale grades at 1 year after surgery.[10]Wendt K, Nau C, Jug M, et al. ESTES recommendation on thoracolumbar spine fractures: January 2023. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1261-75. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00068-023-02247-3 [113]Haghnegahdar A, Behjat R, Saadat S, et al. A randomized controlled trial of early versus late surgical decompression for thoracic and thoracolumbar spinal cord injury in 73 patients. Neurotrauma Rep. 2020 Sep 18;1(1):78-87. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/neur.2020.0027 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34223533?tool=bestpractice.com [114]Badhiwala JH, Wilson JR, Witiw CD, et al. The influence of timing of surgical decompression for acute spinal cord injury: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Neurol. 2021 Feb;20(2):117-26. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357514?tool=bestpractice.com The Congress of Neurological Surgeons (CNS) and the American Association of Neurological Surgeons (AANS) suggest that “early” surgery be considered as an option in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures to reduce length of stay and complications. The CNS/AANS note that available literature has defined “early” surgery inconsistently, ranging from <8 hours to <72 hours after injury.[50]O'Toole JE, Kaiser MG, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: executive summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):2-6. https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fulltext/2019/01000/Congress_of_Neurological_Surgeons_Systematic.1.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202985?tool=bestpractice.com AOSpine 2017 guidelines concluded that early decompression (≤24 hours after injury) for adult patients presenting with spinal cord injury irrespective of level should be offered, although the quality of evidence for the recommendation was low.[115]Fehlings MG, Tetreault LA, Wilson JR, et al. A clinical practice guideline for the management of patients with acute spinal cord injury and central cord syndrome: recommendations on the timing (≤24 hours versus >24 hours) of decompressive surgery. Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(3 suppl):195S-202S. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2192568217706367 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29164024?tool=bestpractice.com
One meta-analysis found no difference in terms of neurologic recovery, return to work, complications, and Cobb angle between anterior and posterior approaches for the surgical management of thoracolumbar burst fracture.[116]Xu GJ, Li ZJ, Ma JX, et al. Anterior versus posterior approach for treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2013 Oct;22(10):2176-83. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24013718?tool=bestpractice.com The anterior approach was associated with longer operative time, greater blood loss, and higher cost than the posterior approach. The CNS and the AANS reviewed literature to address this question.[50]O'Toole JE, Kaiser MG, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: executive summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):2-6. https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fulltext/2019/01000/Congress_of_Neurological_Surgeons_Systematic.1.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202985?tool=bestpractice.com The CNS and ANS identified four randomized clinical trials that did not show any differences in clinical results, including pain and neurologic recovery, between anterior and posterior approaches.[50]O'Toole JE, Kaiser MG, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: executive summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):2-6. https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fulltext/2019/01000/Congress_of_Neurological_Surgeons_Systematic.1.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202985?tool=bestpractice.com Only one level II RCT showed improved clinical outcomes in the posterior-only treatment group compared with the combined group, but the authors recommended against the posterior-only approach because of a high incidence of poor radiologic results.[50]O'Toole JE, Kaiser MG, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: executive summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):2-6. https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fulltext/2019/01000/Congress_of_Neurological_Surgeons_Systematic.1.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202985?tool=bestpractice.com [117]Korovessis P, Baikousis A, Zacharatos S, et al. Combined anterior plus posterior stabilization versus posterior short-segment instrumentation and fusion for mid-lumbar (L2-L4) burst fractures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 15;31(8):859-68. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16622372?tool=bestpractice.com [118]Hao D, Wang W, Duan K, et al. Two-year follow-up evaluation of surgical treatment for thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Oct 1;39(21):E1284-90. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25077910?tool=bestpractice.com [119]Wood K, Buttermann G, Mehbod A, et al. Operative compared with nonoperative treatment of a thoracolumbar burst fracture without neurological deficit. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 May;85(5):773-81. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12728024?tool=bestpractice.com [120]Lin B, Chen ZW, Guo ZM, et al. Anterior approach versus posterior approach with subtotal corpectomy, decompression, and reconstruction of spine in the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: a prospective randomized controlled study. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Aug;25(6):309-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21637134?tool=bestpractice.com The CNS and AAN concluded that anterior, posterior, or combined anterior-posterior approaches are all reasonable treatment options for the surgical management of patients with thoracolumbar fractures, as there was no definitive difference in outcomes or risk of complications when comparing these surgical approaches.[50]O'Toole JE, Kaiser MG, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: executive summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):2-6. https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fulltext/2019/01000/Congress_of_Neurological_Surgeons_Systematic.1.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202985?tool=bestpractice.com
The optimal treatment for thoracolumbar fracture dislocations remains controversial and includes a range of operations, from combined posterior-anterior (P-A) fusion to transforaminal thoracic interbody fusion (TTIF). One randomized controlled trial found that both treatments were similar with respect to clinical and radiologic outcomes; however, blood loss, operating time, and rate of perioperative complications were greater in the P-A group than in the TTIF group.[118]Hao D, Wang W, Duan K, et al. Two-year follow-up evaluation of surgical treatment for thoracolumbar fracture-dislocation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Oct 1;39(21):E1284-90. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25077910?tool=bestpractice.com
Three-dimensional computer-assisted navigation placement of pedicle screws can increase accuracy and reduce surgical time, and can be performed safely and effectively at all levels of the thoracic spine, particularly the upper thoracic spine.[122]Wu H, Gao ZL, Wang JC, et al. Pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: a randomized comparison study of computer-assisted navigation and conventional techniques. Chin J Traumatol. 2010 Aug 1;13(4):201-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20670575?tool=bestpractice.com Studies have also shown decreased intraoperative radiation exposure and improved safety of minimally invasive spinal surgery under the assistance of navigation techniques compared with free-hand techniques and fluoroscopy.[123]Gelalis ID, Paschos NK, Pakos EE, et al. Accuracy of pedicle screw placement: a systematic review of prospective in vivo studies comparing free hand, fluoroscopy guidance and navigation techniques. Eur Spine J. 2012 Feb;21(2):247-55. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21901328?tool=bestpractice.com [124]Verma R, Krishan S, Haendlmayer K, et al. Functional outcome of computer-assisted spinal pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 23 studies including 5,992 pedicle screws. Eur Spine J. 2010 Mar;19(3):370-5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2899753 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20052504?tool=bestpractice.com [125]Shin BJ, James AR, Njoku IU, et al. Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion. J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Aug;17(2):113-22. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22724594?tool=bestpractice.com [126]Fan Y, Peng Du J, Liu JJ, et al. Radiological and clinical differences among three assisted technologies in pedicle screw fixation of adult degenerative scoliosis. Sci Rep. 2018 Jan 17;8(1):890. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-19054-7 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29343756?tool=bestpractice.com [127]Kantelhardt SR, Martinez R, Baerwinkel S, et al. Perioperative course and accuracy of screw positioning in conventional, open robotic-guided and percutaneous robotic-guided, pedicle screw placement. Eur Spine J. 2011 Jun;20(6):860-8. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00586-011-1729-2 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21384205?tool=bestpractice.com [128]Gao S, Lv Z, Fang H. Robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur Spine J. 2018 Apr;27(4):921-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29032475?tool=bestpractice.com [129]Tian W, Xu YF, Liu B, et al. Computer-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion may be better than open surgery for treating degenerative lumbar disease. Clin Spine Surg. 2017 Jul;30(6):237-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28632545?tool=bestpractice.com
Orthopedic robotic surgery is also used in some centers, combined with computer navigation techniques, to treat thoracic and vertebral fractures.[130]Tian W, Liu YJ, Liu B, et al; Technical Committee on Medical Robot Engineering of Chinese Society of Biomedical Engineering; Technical Consulting Committee of National Robotic Orthopaedic Surgery Application Center. Guideline for thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement assisted by orthopaedic surgical robot. Orthop Surg. 2019 Apr;11(2):153-9. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/os.12453 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31025807?tool=bestpractice.com
analgesia
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
The most common analgesia used for musculoskeletal pain includes NSAIDs and/or acetaminophen for mild to moderate pain, while an opioid may be used for severe pain.
NSAIDs should be used with caution in older people because of increased susceptibility to adverse effects such as gastrointestinal bleeding and cardiovascular events.[131]McCarberg BH. NSAIDs in the older patient: balancing benefits and harms. Pain Med. 2013 Dec;14 suppl 1:S43-4. https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article/14/suppl_1/S43/1941495 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24373111?tool=bestpractice.com [132]Davis A, Robson J. The dangers of NSAIDs: look both ways. Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Apr;66(645):172-3. https://bjgp.org/content/66/645/172 The UK guidelines recommend to consider acetaminophen ahead of oral NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, or opioids.[87]Royal Osteoporosis Society. Guidance for the management of symptomatic vertebral fragility fractures. May 2022 [internet publication]. https://pcrmm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/ROS-guidance-on-managing-symptoms-of-vertebral-fractures-2022-_1_.pdf
Opioids are recommended only for very short-term use with acute fractures. If used chronically, opioids lose potency, induce dependence, raise risk for addiction, and lead to falls and central sensitization.[43]LeBoff MS, Greenspan SL, Insogna KL, et al. The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2022 Oct;33(10):2049-102. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00198-021-05900-y http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35478046?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
ibuprofen: 400-800 mg orally every 6-8 hours when required, maximum 2400 mg/day
or
diclofenac potassium: 50 mg orally (immediate-release) three times daily when required
-- AND / OR --
acetaminophen: 325-1000 mg orally every 4-6 hours when required, maximum 4000 mg/day
Secondary options
codeine sulfate: 15-60 mg orally every 4-6 hours when required, maximum 360 mg/day
OR
oxycodone: 5-30 mg orally every 4-6 hours when required
DVT prophylaxis
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Appropriate DVT prophylaxis is recommended to prevent DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE).[10]Wendt K, Nau C, Jug M, et al. ESTES recommendation on thoracolumbar spine fractures: January 2023. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1261-75. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00068-023-02247-3 [50]O'Toole JE, Kaiser MG, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: executive summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):2-6. https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fulltext/2019/01000/Congress_of_Neurological_Surgeons_Systematic.1.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202985?tool=bestpractice.com Compression stockings and anticoagulation should be commenced within 72 hours of the initial injury.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf The ACS recommends initiating mechanical prophylaxis (e.g., sequential or pneumatic compression devices and compression stockings) immediately after the injury, if possible, especially for patients with bleeding risk or other contraindications for chemoprophylaxis.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf There is insufficient evidence to recommend a specific regimen of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis to prevent PE (or VTE-associated morbidity and mortality) in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf [50]O'Toole JE, Kaiser MG, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: executive summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):2-6. https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fulltext/2019/01000/Congress_of_Neurological_Surgeons_Systematic.1.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202985?tool=bestpractice.com The duration of chemoprophylaxis should be determined based on an individual patient basis, taking into account injury severity, mobility status, bleeding risk, and other comorbidities. Chemoprophylaxis should never be continued for longer than 3 months.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf
pressure ulcer prevention
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
There is an extremely high risk of developing pressure ulcers after a spinal cord injury because of a lack of sensation, which leaves patients unaware of the development of a pressure ulcer; a lack of muscle activity below the level of injury; and impaired circulation, which reduces the transfer of oxygen to the skin.
A pressure ulcer may delay the patient's treatment by weeks, and leave a scar that may be permanently vulnerable. Patients should be regularly turned in a safe manner to reduce pressure on any one side, and the skin should be regularly assessed for signs of pressure ulcers. It is usually sufficient to turn the patient 30° side-to-side with appropriate pillow support. Heels should be kept clear of the bed and supported with pillows. Pressure-relieving devices such as dynamic mattresses should not be used if the spinal column is unstable, and they are usually ineffective in preventing pressure sores in patients with spinal cord injury.
Pressure ulcers in children are often caused by pressure from equipment such as braces and splints, as well as lost or forgotten toys in the bed or on the chair cushion.
Patients must never be allowed to sit or lie on a pressure ulcer.[133]London Spinal Cord Injury Centre, National Spinal Cord Injury Board. The management of children with spinal cord injuries - advice for major trauma networks and SCI centres on the development of joint protocols. Jun 2014 [internet publication]. https://res.cloudinary.com/studio-republic/images/v1635686643/Spinal_Cord_Injuries_Advice_for_Development_of_Joint_Protocols/Spinal_Cord_Injuries_Advice_for_Development_of_Joint_Protocols.pdf?_i=AA
bladder care and urethral catheterization
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
The bladder can become flaccid during spinal shock, leading to overdistension, which can cause permanent damage. All patients require a urethral catheter, which should initially be set to free drainage.[133]London Spinal Cord Injury Centre, National Spinal Cord Injury Board. The management of children with spinal cord injuries - advice for major trauma networks and SCI centres on the development of joint protocols. Jun 2014 [internet publication]. https://res.cloudinary.com/studio-republic/images/v1635686643/Spinal_Cord_Injuries_Advice_for_Development_of_Joint_Protocols/Spinal_Cord_Injuries_Advice_for_Development_of_Joint_Protocols.pdf?_i=AA
management of autonomic dysreflexia
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Autonomic dysreflexia is a potentially dangerous condition that can occur in patients with a spinal cord injury affecting T6 or higher, leading to uncontrolled hypertension, which can further lead to seizures, retinal hemorrhage, cerebral hemorrhage, pulmonary edema, myocardial infarction, or renal impairment. The pathophysiologic mechanism involves a stimulus below the level of the lesion, which activates the sympathetic nervous system. The activated sympathetic system cannot be neuromodulated appropriately by the central nervous system, owing to a lack of spinal cord continuity as descending inhibitory signals cannot travel beyond the level of injury.[134]Milligan J, Lee J, McMillan C, et al. Autonomic dysreflexia: recognizing a common serious condition in patients with spinal cord injury. Can Fam Physician. 2012 Aug;58(8):831-5. https://www.cfp.ca/content/58/8/831.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22893332?tool=bestpractice.com
Treatment involves management of the underlying cause of the stimuli, and the use of antihypertensive medication as per local guidelines.
supportive measures
The American College of Surgeons recommends that stable thoracolumbar fractures in patients without neurologic deficits can be safely managed nonoperatively.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf Prolonged bed rest is not indicated for these patients and a best practice involves adequate pain control and early ambulation without a brace.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf [74]Bakhsheshian J, Dahdaleh NS, Fakurnejad S, et al. Evidence-based management of traumatic thoracolumbar burst fractures: a systematic review of nonoperative management. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37(1):E1. https://www.doi.org/10.3171/2014.4.FOCUS14159 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24981897?tool=bestpractice.com
As well as the absence of neurologic deficit, other indications for conservative treatment include resolving neurologic deficit, or deficit that does not correlate to demonstrable compression, deformity, or instability; acceptable alignment (initial or after postural reduction), compression fracture <50% of vertebral body height; and angulation <20°.[91]Cantor JB, Lebwohl NH, Garvey T, et al. Nonoperative management of stable thoracolumbar burst fractures with early ambulation and bracing. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Jun 15;18(8):971-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8367784?tool=bestpractice.com [92]Shen WJ, Shen YS. Nonsurgical treatment of three-column thoracolumbar junction burst fractures without neurologic deficit. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 Feb 15;24(4):412-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10065527?tool=bestpractice.com [93]Alanay A, Yazici M, Acaroglu E, et al. Course of nonsurgical management of burst fractures with intact posterior ligamentous complex: an MRI study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Nov 1;29(21):2425-31. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15507806?tool=bestpractice.com
Conservative treatment options include bed rest (giving consideration to the risks of pressure sores, thromboembolism, respiratory problems, and constipation); catheterization for bladder problems (suprapubic catheterization for chronic bladder problems); laxatives to prevent constipation; and early rehabilitation and physical therapy.[10]Wendt K, Nau C, Jug M, et al. ESTES recommendation on thoracolumbar spine fractures: January 2023. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1261-75. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00068-023-02247-3 Bracing can be prescribed for patient comfort, if desired.[50]O'Toole JE, Kaiser MG, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: executive summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):2-6. https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fulltext/2019/01000/Congress_of_Neurological_Surgeons_Systematic.1.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202985?tool=bestpractice.com [94]Hoh DJ, Qureshi S, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: nonoperative care. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):E46-9. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy369 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30203096?tool=bestpractice.com Braces are often used in thoracolumbar fractures. However, limited high-quality evidence demonstrates that early mobilization without orthosis can lead to similar pain relief, quality of life, and functional outcome for up to 5-10 years, when compared with the use of thoracolumbar orthosis.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf [95]Urquhart JC, Alrehaili OA, Fisher CG, et al. Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: extended follow-up of a randomized clinical trial comparing orthosis versus no orthosis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Jul;27(1):42-7. https://www.doi.org/10.3171/2016.11.SPINE161031 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28409669?tool=bestpractice.com [96]Bailey CS, Urquhart JC, Dvorak MF, et al. Orthosis versus no orthosis for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic injury: a multicenter prospective randomized equivalence trial. Spine J. 2014 Nov 1;14(11):2557-64. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24184649?tool=bestpractice.com [97]Shamji MF, Roffey DM, Young DK, et al. A pilot evaluation of the role of bracing in stable thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2014 Oct;27(7):370-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22907065?tool=bestpractice.com [98]Post RB, Keizer HJ, Leferink VJ, et al. Functional outcome 5 years after non-operative treatment of type A spinal fractures. Eur Spine J. 2006 Apr;15(4):472-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15937675?tool=bestpractice.com [99]Peev N, Zileli M, Sharif S, et al. Indications for nonsurgical treatment of thoracolumbar spine fractures: WFNS Spine Committee recommendations. Neurospine. 2021 Dec;18(4):713-24. https://www.doi.org/10.14245/ns.2142390.195 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35000324?tool=bestpractice.com If an orthosis is applied, it should be noted that external devices tend to become loose over time, and will need adjustments by the clinician.[100]Bucholz RM, Heckman JD. Rockwood and Green's fractures in adults, 5th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002:1424-34. Upper thoracic fractures: need to include the cervical spine, using a Sternal Occipital Mandibular Immobilizer (SOMI) brace; thoracolumbar junction: need to include sacrum.
analgesia
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
The most common analgesia used for musculoskeletal pain includes NSAIDs and/or acetaminophen for mild to moderate pain, while an opioid may be used for severe pain.
NSAIDs should be used with caution in older people because of increased susceptibility to adverse effects such as gastrointestinal bleeding and cardiovascular events.[131]McCarberg BH. NSAIDs in the older patient: balancing benefits and harms. Pain Med. 2013 Dec;14 suppl 1:S43-4. https://academic.oup.com/painmedicine/article/14/suppl_1/S43/1941495 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24373111?tool=bestpractice.com [132]Davis A, Robson J. The dangers of NSAIDs: look both ways. Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Apr;66(645):172-3. https://bjgp.org/content/66/645/172 The UK guidelines recommend to consider acetaminophen ahead of oral NSAIDs, COX-2 inhibitors, or opioids.[87]Royal Osteoporosis Society. Guidance for the management of symptomatic vertebral fragility fractures. May 2022 [internet publication]. https://pcrmm.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/ROS-guidance-on-managing-symptoms-of-vertebral-fractures-2022-_1_.pdf
Opioids are recommended only for very short-term use with acute fractures. If used chronically, opioids lose potency, induce dependence, raise risk for addiction, and lead to falls and central sensitization.[43]LeBoff MS, Greenspan SL, Insogna KL, et al. The clinician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2022 Oct;33(10):2049-102. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00198-021-05900-y http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35478046?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
ibuprofen: 400-800 mg orally every 6-8 hours when required, maximum 2400 mg/day
or
diclofenac potassium: 50 mg orally (immediate-release) three times daily when required
-- AND / OR --
acetaminophen: 325-1000 mg orally every 4-6 hours when required, maximum 4000 mg/day
Secondary options
codeine sulfate: 15-60 mg orally every 4-6 hours when required, maximum 360 mg/day
OR
oxycodone: 5-30 mg orally every 4-6 hours when required
DVT prophylaxis
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Appropriate DVT prophylaxis is recommended to prevent DVT and pulmonary embolism (PE).[10]Wendt K, Nau C, Jug M, et al. ESTES recommendation on thoracolumbar spine fractures: January 2023. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2024 Aug;50(4):1261-75. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00068-023-02247-3 [50]O'Toole JE, Kaiser MG, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: executive summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):2-6. https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fulltext/2019/01000/Congress_of_Neurological_Surgeons_Systematic.1.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202985?tool=bestpractice.com Compression stockings and anticoagulation should be commenced within 72 hours of the initial injury.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf The ACS recommends initiating mechanical prophylaxis (e.g., sequential or pneumatic compression devices and compression stockings) immediately after the injury, if possible, especially for patients with bleeding risk or other contraindications for chemoprophylaxis.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf There is insufficient evidence to recommend a specific regimen of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis to prevent PE (or VTE-associated morbidity and mortality) in patients with thoracic and lumbar fractures.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf [50]O'Toole JE, Kaiser MG, Anderson PA, et al. Congress of Neurological Surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines on the evaluation and treatment of patients with thoracolumbar spine trauma: executive summary. Neurosurgery. 2019 Jan 1;84(1):2-6. https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/Fulltext/2019/01000/Congress_of_Neurological_Surgeons_Systematic.1.aspx http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30202985?tool=bestpractice.com The duration of chemoprophylaxis should be determined based on an individual patient basis, taking into account injury severity, mobility status, bleeding risk, and other comorbidities. Chemoprophylaxis should never be continued for longer than 3 months.[11]American College of Surgeons. Best practices guidelines. Spine injury. Mar 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.facs.org/media/k45gikqv/spine_injury_guidelines.pdf
pressure ulcer prevention
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
There is an extremely high risk of developing pressure ulcers after a spinal cord injury because of a lack of sensation, which leaves patients unaware of the development of a pressure ulcer; a lack of muscle activity below the level of injury; and impaired circulation, which reduces the transfer of oxygen to the skin.
A pressure ulcer may delay the patient's treatment by weeks, and leave a scar that may be permanently vulnerable. Patients should be regularly turned in a safe manner to reduce pressure on any one side, and the skin should be regularly assessed for signs of pressure ulcers. It is usually sufficient to turn the patient 30° side-to-side with appropriate pillow support. Heels should be kept clear of the bed and supported with pillows. Pressure-relieving devices such as dynamic mattresses should not be used if the spinal column is unstable, and they are usually ineffective in preventing pressure sores in patients with spinal cord injury.
Pressure ulcers in children are often caused by pressure from equipment such as braces and splints, as well as lost or forgotten toys in the bed or on the chair cushion.
Patients must never be allowed to sit or lie on a pressure ulcer.[133]London Spinal Cord Injury Centre, National Spinal Cord Injury Board. The management of children with spinal cord injuries - advice for major trauma networks and SCI centres on the development of joint protocols. Jun 2014 [internet publication]. https://res.cloudinary.com/studio-republic/images/v1635686643/Spinal_Cord_Injuries_Advice_for_Development_of_Joint_Protocols/Spinal_Cord_Injuries_Advice_for_Development_of_Joint_Protocols.pdf?_i=AA
bladder care and urethral catheterization
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
The bladder can become flaccid during spinal shock, leading to overdistension, which can cause permanent damage. All patients require a urethral catheter, which should initially be set to free drainage.[133]London Spinal Cord Injury Centre, National Spinal Cord Injury Board. The management of children with spinal cord injuries - advice for major trauma networks and SCI centres on the development of joint protocols. Jun 2014 [internet publication]. https://res.cloudinary.com/studio-republic/images/v1635686643/Spinal_Cord_Injuries_Advice_for_Development_of_Joint_Protocols/Spinal_Cord_Injuries_Advice_for_Development_of_Joint_Protocols.pdf?_i=AA
management of autonomic dysreflexia
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Autonomic dysreflexia is a potentially dangerous condition that can occur in patients with a spinal cord injury affecting T6 or higher, leading to uncontrolled hypertension, which can further lead to seizures, retinal hemorrhage, cerebral hemorrhage, pulmonary edema, myocardial infarction, or renal impairment. The pathophysiologic mechanism involves a stimulus below the level of the lesion, which activates the sympathetic nervous system. The activated sympathetic system cannot be neuromodulated appropriately by the central nervous system, owing to a lack of spinal cord continuity as descending inhibitory signals cannot travel beyond the level of injury.[134]Milligan J, Lee J, McMillan C, et al. Autonomic dysreflexia: recognizing a common serious condition in patients with spinal cord injury. Can Fam Physician. 2012 Aug;58(8):831-5. https://www.cfp.ca/content/58/8/831.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22893332?tool=bestpractice.com
Treatment involves management of the underlying cause of the stimuli, and the use of antihypertensive medication as per local guidelines.
Choose a patient group to see our recommendations
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups. See disclaimer
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer