It has been estimated that, in the US in 2024, there will be 56,500 new cases of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in women.[6]Siegel RL, Giaquinto AN, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2024. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):12-49.
https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21820
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38230766?tool=bestpractice.com
DCIS comprises approximately 85% and lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is approximately 15% of in situ carcinomas of the breast.
The reported percentage of untreated cases of DCIS that will eventually progress to invasive disease varies widely, from 14% to 75%.[4]Leonard GD, Swain SM. Ductal carcinoma in situ, complexities and challenges. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jun 16;96(12):906-20.
https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/96/12/906/2520795
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15199110?tool=bestpractice.com
A diagnosis of LCIS confers an approximately 8- to 10-fold increased risk of breast cancer and the risk of invasive disease is equally distributed between both breasts.[7]Portschy PR, Marmor S, Nzara R, et al. Trends in incidence and management of lobular carcinoma in situ: a population-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(10):3240-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23846782?tool=bestpractice.com
DCIS diagnosis peaks at age 70-74 years. Black, Hispanic, Chinese, and Korean women have a lower incidence of DCIS as compared with white women. The rate of diagnosis of DCIS in the US and in Europe increased dramatically through the 1990s due to the widespread use of mammography and has leveled off since. DCIS in men is uncommon, accounting for approximately 7% of all male breast carcinomas. Compared with invasive carcinomas of the breast, the prognosis associated with DCIS in men is excellent; however, clinical features, pathology, and treatment of this disease are not well defined in the literature.[8]Camus MG, Joshi MG, Mackarem G, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the male breast. Cancer. 1994 Aug 15;74(4):1289-93.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8055450?tool=bestpractice.com
While it is well established that hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is associated with an increased risk of invasive breast cancer, there is not a similar association with HRT and DCIS.[9]Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 3;102(3):170-8.
https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/102/3/170/895415
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20071685?tool=bestpractice.com
The lack of association is consistent across five observational studies and one large randomized trial.[9]Virnig BA, Tuttle TM, Shamliyan T, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a systematic review of incidence, treatment, and outcomes. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Feb 3;102(3):170-8.
https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/102/3/170/895415
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20071685?tool=bestpractice.com
The true incidence of LCIS is difficult to determine, with reports ranging from 0.07% to 3% in core biopsy specimens.[3]Ginter PS, D'Alfonso TM. Current concepts in diagnosis, molecular features, and management of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast with a discussion of morphologic variants. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Dec;141(12):1668-78.
https://meridian.allenpress.com/aplm/article/141/12/1668/65743/Current-Concepts-in-Diagnosis-Molecular-Features
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28574280?tool=bestpractice.com
Multiple publications indicate that the incidence of LCIS is increasing, which may be attributed to better screening techniques, more core biopsies being carried out, and better recognition by pathologists. The incidence of LCIS increased from 0.9 in 100,000 person-years between 1978-1980, to 3.19 in 100,000 person-years from 1996-1998.[3]Ginter PS, D'Alfonso TM. Current concepts in diagnosis, molecular features, and management of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast with a discussion of morphologic variants. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Dec;141(12):1668-78.
https://meridian.allenpress.com/aplm/article/141/12/1668/65743/Current-Concepts-in-Diagnosis-Molecular-Features
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28574280?tool=bestpractice.com
[10]Li CI, Anderson BO, Daling JR, et al. Changing incidence of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2002 Oct;75(3):259-68.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12353815?tool=bestpractice.com
Analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data showed that the incidence of LCIS increased from 2.00 in 100,000 in 2000, to 2.75 in 100,000 in 2009.[7]Portschy PR, Marmor S, Nzara R, et al. Trends in incidence and management of lobular carcinoma in situ: a population-based analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013 Oct;20(10):3240-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23846782?tool=bestpractice.com
SEER data from 18,835 women diagnosed with LCIS from 1990-2015 demonstrated that, compared to white women, black women had a 30% higher risk of developing hormone receptor (HR)-positive breast cancer and an 85% higher risk of developing HR-negative breast cancer.[11]Dania V, Liu Y, Ademuyiwa F, et al. Associations of race and ethnicity with risk of developing invasive breast cancer after lobular carcinoma in situ. Breast Cancer Res. 2019 Nov 14;21(1):120.
https://breast-cancer-research.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13058-019-1219-8
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727116?tool=bestpractice.com
Lobular carcinoma, both in situ and invasive, is rare in males, with an incidence of about 0.5% to 1%.[12]Zygogianni AG, Kyrgias G, Gennatas C, et al. Male breast carcinoma: epidemiology, risk factors and current therapeutic approaches. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(1):15-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22502659?tool=bestpractice.com
[13]San Miguel P, Sancho M, Enriquez JL, et al. Lobular carcinoma of the male breast associated with the use of cimetidine. Virchows Arch. 1997 Mar;430(3):261-3.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9099985?tool=bestpractice.com