After 5 years of treatment with tamoxifen, relative risk of tamoxifen-related endometrial cancer is 2.5 compared with no treatment.[140]Fisher B, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al. Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998 Sep 16;90(18):1371-88.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9747868?tool=bestpractice.com
The risk of endometrial cancer is less with raloxifene than with tamoxifen.[128]Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, et al; National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP). Effects of tamoxifen vs raloxifene on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes: the NSABP Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) P-2 trial. JAMA. 2006 Nov;42(17):2909-13.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/203040
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16754727?tool=bestpractice.com
Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is a potential precursor of invasive carcinoma and suggests that cancer will become invasive at that site.[1]Hieken TJ, Cheregi J, Farolan M, et al. Predicting relapse in ductal carcinoma in situ patients: an analysis of biologic markers with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg. 2007 Oct;194(4):504-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17826066?tool=bestpractice.com
Lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) develops in breast lobule(s) and/or terminal ducts and is usually found incidentally. Whereas DCIS predicts an increased risk of invasive ductal carcinoma developing at the site of a biopsy demonstrating DCIS, LCIS implies increased risk of invasive ductal or lobular carcinoma developing in either breast.[2]Cocquyt V, Van Belle S. Lobular carcinoma in situ and invasive lobular cancer of the breast. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;17(1):55-60.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15711412?tool=bestpractice.com
LCIS is not cancer but a pathologic description of a neoplastic proliferation of cells within lobules and/or terminal ducts, which is a risk factor for invasive breast cancer.[3]Ginter PS, D'Alfonso TM. Current concepts in diagnosis, molecular features, and management of lobular carcinoma in situ of the breast with a discussion of morphologic variants. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2017 Dec;141(12):1668-78.
https://meridian.allenpress.com/aplm/article/141/12/1668/65743/Current-Concepts-in-Diagnosis-Molecular-Features
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28574280?tool=bestpractice.com
A finding of LCIS does not imply that cancer will form at the diagnostic site. Consequently, treatment for LCIS is less formalized than for DCIS.
In one randomized trial, the relative risk of hospitalization or death from a pulmonary embolus after taking tamoxifen for 10 years compared with stopping after 5 years was 1.87 (95% CI 1.13 to 3.07, P=0.01), with a 0.2% risk of death in both groups.[141]Davies C, Pan H, Godwin J, et al; Adjuvant Tamoxifen: Longer Against Shorter (ATLAS) Collaborative Group. Long-term effects of continuing adjuvant tamoxifen to 10 years versus stopping at 5 years after diagnosis of oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer: ATLAS, a randomised trial. Lancet. 2013 Mar 9;381(9869):805-16.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(12)61963-1/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23219286?tool=bestpractice.com
In the shorter term, the thromboembolic effects of tamoxifen increase the risk of skin flap necrosis during breast reconstruction performed as a delayed procedure after mastectomy.[142]Kelley BP, Valero V, Yi M, et al. Tamoxifen increases the risk of microvascular flap complications in patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012 Feb;129(2):305-14.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3921070
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21987043?tool=bestpractice.com
The use of aromatase inhibitors in women with breast cancer is associated with a greater cardiovascular risk than tamoxifen.[143]Khosrow-Khavar F, Filion KB, Bouganim N, et al. Aromatase inhibitors and the risk of cardiovascular outcomes in women with breast cancer: a population-based cohort study. Circulation. 2020 Feb 18;141(7):549-59.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.044750
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32065766?tool=bestpractice.com
variable
medium
In patients receiving whole breast radiation therapy (WBRT), a small portion of the lung and ribs receive radiation, which can induce lung scarring and slightly increase the risk of rib fracture. Furthermore, the heart is incidentally exposed to small doses of radiation when treating left-sided breast cancers, which may increase the risk of ischemic heart disease.[115]Darby SC, Ewertz M, McGale P, et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 14;368(11):987-98.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1209825
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23484825?tool=bestpractice.com
Risk of ischemic heart disease may increase with increasing doses of radiation to the heart.[115]Darby SC, Ewertz M, McGale P, et al. Risk of ischemic heart disease in women after radiotherapy for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 14;368(11):987-98.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1209825
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23484825?tool=bestpractice.com
Newer techniques, such as hypofractionated and ultra-hypofractionated WBRT regimens and accelerated partial breast irradiation/partial breast irradiation (APBI/PBI), minimize the dose and, therefore, sequelae.[116]Shah C, Al-Hilli Z, Vicini F. Advances in breast cancer radiotherapy: implications for current and future practice. JCO Oncol Pract. 2021 Dec;17(12):697-706.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/OP.21.00635
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34652952?tool=bestpractice.com
APBI/PBI using external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) given once daily or on alternate days is associated with improved cosmesis and reduced acute and late toxicities compared with WBRT.[103]Coles CE, Griffin CL, Kirby AM, et al. Partial-breast radiotherapy after breast conservation surgery for patients with early breast cancer (UK IMPORT LOW trial): 5-year results from a multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2017 Sep 9;390(10099):1048-60.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(17)31145-5/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28779963?tool=bestpractice.com
[106]Meattini I, Marrazzo L, Saieva C, et al. Accelerated partial-breast irradiation compared with whole-breast irradiation for early breast cancer: long-term results of the randomized phase III APBI-IMRT-florence trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Dec 10;38(35):4175-83.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32840419?tool=bestpractice.com
[113]Franceschini D, Loi M, Chiola I, et al. Preliminary results of a randomized study on postmenopausal women with early stage breast cancer: adjuvant hypofractionated whole breast irradiation versus accelerated partial breast irradiation (HYPAB Trial). Clin Breast Cancer. 2021 Jun;21(3):231-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33121891?tool=bestpractice.com
Twice-daily EBRT regimens are associated with worse late toxicity and cosmesis.[101]Haussmann J, Budach W, Corradini S, et al. Comparison of adverse events in partial- or whole breast radiotherapy: investigation of cosmesis, toxicities and quality of life in a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Radiat Oncol. 2023 Nov 2;18(1):181.
https://ro-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13014-023-02365-7
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37919752?tool=bestpractice.com
[102]Whelan TJ, Julian JA, Berrang TS, et al. External beam accelerated partial breast irradiation versus whole breast irradiation after breast conserving surgery in women with ductal carcinoma in situ and node-negative breast cancer (RAPID): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Dec 14;394(10215):2165-72.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31813635?tool=bestpractice.com
APBI/PBI using multicatheter brachytherapy has shown similar late toxicity outcomes to WBRT, with comparable or improved cosmesis.[101]Haussmann J, Budach W, Corradini S, et al. Comparison of adverse events in partial- or whole breast radiotherapy: investigation of cosmesis, toxicities and quality of life in a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Radiat Oncol. 2023 Nov 2;18(1):181.
https://ro-journal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13014-023-02365-7
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37919752?tool=bestpractice.com
[104]Strnad V, Polgár C, Ott OJ, et al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation using sole interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy compared with whole-breast irradiation with boost for early breast cancer: 10-year results of a GEC-ESTRO randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Mar;24(3):262-72.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36738756?tool=bestpractice.com
[107]Polgár C, Major T, Takácsi-Nagy Z, et al. Breast-conserving surgery followed by partial or whole breast irradiation: twenty-year results of a phase 3 clinical study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2021 Mar 15;109(4):998-1006.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33186620?tool=bestpractice.com
[114]Polgár C, Ott OJ, Hildebrandt G, et al. Late side-effects and cosmetic results of accelerated partial breast irradiation with interstitial brachytherapy versus whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for low-risk invasive and in-situ carcinoma of the female breast: 5-year results of a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017 Feb;18(2):259-68.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28094198?tool=bestpractice.com