Screening by parents of children who have been exposed
Parents of school-aged children are often asked to screen their asymptomatic children for head lice infestation if their child has been exposed or had close contact with someone with an infestation. The circumstances could be an exposure in a school classroom, camp, or sleepover party in the preceding month. The parent should receive instructions on how to effectively look for live lice. Alternatively, parents of young school-aged children could assume exposure could take place at any time, and screen their children for live lice on a weekly basis, using the same effective technique (wet combing).[5]American Academy of Pediatrics, Nolt D, Moore S, et al. Head Lice. Pediatrics. 2022 Oct 1;150(4):e2022059282.
https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/150/4/e2022059282/189566/Head-Lice
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36156158?tool=bestpractice.com
[31]American Academy of Pediatrics. Head lice. In: 2006 Red Book: report of the committee on infectious diseases. 27:448-92.[32]Public Health Medicine Environmental Group. Head lice: evidence-based guidelines based on the Stafford Report - 2012 update [internet publication].
https://www.nhsggc.org.uk/media/239960/stafford-head-lice-2012.pdf
Screening in the school setting
Screening large groups of asymptomatic children in the school setting is time consuming, disruptive to the learning environment, and has never been shown to be effective, although many feel this is a necessary duty of the school nurse.[40]Pollack RJ. The role of the school in battling head lice. Our children (US National PTA). 2007 [internet publication].
https://identify.us.com/idmybug/head-lice/head-lice-documents/pta_battling_lice.pdf
People performing the evaluation should be qualified to perform the task (formally trained), have the necessary equipment (a suitable magnifying device), and be legally empowered (an MD or appropriate nursing credential) to render a diagnosis. Teachers, custodians, and parent volunteers should not screen children and make diagnoses of head lice infestations.[35]Pollack RJ, Kiszewski AD, Spielman A. Overdiagnosis and consequent mismanagement of head louse infestation in North America. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000 Aug;19(8):689-93.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10959734?tool=bestpractice.com
[40]Pollack RJ. The role of the school in battling head lice. Our children (US National PTA). 2007 [internet publication].
https://identify.us.com/idmybug/head-lice/head-lice-documents/pta_battling_lice.pdf
School nurses should be able to diagnose head lice infestation in a symptomatic child referred for a head-check. In circumstances where there are an unusually high number of children with infestations, school nurses could assist by evaluating the environment for high-risk exposure situations, provide accurate information to staff, students, and parents, and aid in screening the limited number of children in the situation.[40]Pollack RJ. The role of the school in battling head lice. Our children (US National PTA). 2007 [internet publication].
https://identify.us.com/idmybug/head-lice/head-lice-documents/pta_battling_lice.pdf
Routine classroom or school-wide screenings have not shown to be helpful and should be discouraged.[5]American Academy of Pediatrics, Nolt D, Moore S, et al. Head Lice. Pediatrics. 2022 Oct 1;150(4):e2022059282.
https://publications.aap.org/pediatrics/article/150/4/e2022059282/189566/Head-Lice
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36156158?tool=bestpractice.com
These mass screenings either give a false sense of security (because wet combing is rarely used, and casual observation could miss many cases) or result in many more children being recommended for treatment than is necessary (when eggs or nits alone are used as the diagnostic criteria).[35]Pollack RJ, Kiszewski AD, Spielman A. Overdiagnosis and consequent mismanagement of head louse infestation in North America. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000 Aug;19(8):689-93.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10959734?tool=bestpractice.com
[29]Williams LK, Reichert A, MacKenzie WR, et al. Lice, nits, and school policy. Pediatrics. 2001 May;107(5):1011-5.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11331679?tool=bestpractice.com
[30]Mumcuoglu KY, Meinking TA, Burkhart CN, et al. Head louse infestations: the "no nit" policy and its consequences. Int J Derm. 2006 Aug;45(8):891-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16911370?tool=bestpractice.com
School nurses can make good use of their time by instructing parents in proper diagnostic technique, and lending their expertise to families having difficulty with diagnosis or treatment.[8]Counahan M, Andrews R, Buttner P, et al. Head lice prevalence in primary schools in Victoria, Australia. J Paediatr Child Health. 2004 Nov;40(11):616-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15469530?tool=bestpractice.com
[13]Meinking TL. Infestations: pediculosis. Curr Probl Dermatol. 1996;24:157-63.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8743266?tool=bestpractice.com
[35]Pollack RJ, Kiszewski AD, Spielman A. Overdiagnosis and consequent mismanagement of head louse infestation in North America. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2000 Aug;19(8):689-93.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10959734?tool=bestpractice.com
[38]Hootman J. Quality improvement projects related to pediculosis management. J School Nursing. 2002 Apr;18(2):80-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12017250?tool=bestpractice.com
[40]Pollack RJ. The role of the school in battling head lice. Our children (US National PTA). 2007 [internet publication].
https://identify.us.com/idmybug/head-lice/head-lice-documents/pta_battling_lice.pdf