Sustained ventricular tachycardias
- Overview
- Theory
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Follow up
- Resources
Treatment algorithm
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups: see disclaimer
hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia with a pulse
synchronized cardioversion according to advanced cardiac life support protocol + treatment of reversible cause (if present)
Cardioversion is essential for the acute treatment of hemodynamically unstable ventricular tachycardia (VT) (symptomatic or severely hypotensive VT).[1]Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M, et al. 2022 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 21;43(40):3997-4126. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/43/40/3997/6675633?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36017572?tool=bestpractice.com
Synchronized cardioversion should be considered before attempting antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients who have syncope, presyncope, frequent palpitations, or hypotension (particularly those with symptoms of diminished cerebral perfusion), even if they have apparently stable hemodynamics.
Cardioversion may be repeated as needed until rhythm is controlled.
In patients with an identifiable reversible cause of VT (e.g., ischemia, myocardial infarction, toxicity, drug overdose) management will also involve treatment of the reversible cause.[1]Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M, et al. 2022 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 21;43(40):3997-4126. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/43/40/3997/6675633?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36017572?tool=bestpractice.com
antiarrhythmic medication
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Medical therapy provides an important adjunctive therapy to emergency cardiovascular care, based on the advanced cardiac life support protocol. Amiodarone and/or lidocaine are considered useful antiarrhythmic drugs in these circumstances.[34]Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, et al; Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support Writing Group. Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S366-468. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081529?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
amiodarone: 300 mg intravenous push
Secondary options
lidocaine: 1 to 1.5 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose
torsades de pointes
intravenous magnesium sulfate + withdraw offending drugs + correct electrolyte abnormalities
Torsades de pointes, a specific type of polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) characterized by a twisting appearance around the baseline, occurs in the setting of QT prolongation due to either the congenital or acquired forms of the long QT syndrome. Torsades de pointes should be treated as any other form of VT according to the advanced cardiac life support protocol, with special recognition of the fact that hypokalemia and hypomagnesemia frequently are associated with torsades. Electrolyte deficiencies should be replenished aggressively. Offending drugs should be withdrawn. An up-to-date list of drugs is available through research centers. CredibleMeds: Arizona Center for Education and Research on Therapeutics Opens in new window Intravenous magnesium sulfate should be administered. Additionally, overdrive pacing and isoproterenol infusion may be useful in this arrhythmia as they reduce the QT interval.[34]Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, et al; Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support Writing Group. Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S366-468. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081529?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
magnesium sulfate: 1-2 g intravenously as a single dose
isoproterenol infusion
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Indicated in patients who present with recurrent torsades de pointes after initial acute therapy.
It may be useful in this arrhythmia as it reduces the QT interval.[56]Alberca T, Almendral J, Sanz P, et al. Evaluation of the specificity of morphological electrocardiographic criteria for the differential diagnosis of wide QRS complex tachycardia in patients with intraventricular conduction defects. Circulation. 1997 Nov 18;96(10):3527-33. http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/96/10/3527.full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9396451?tool=bestpractice.com
It is important to be certain that the patient does not have acute ischemia before administering isoproterenol.
Primary options
isoproterenol: 2 micrograms/minute intravenous infusion initially, dose titrated according to response, maximum 10 micrograms/minute
temporary or permanent pacing
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Indicated in recurrent torsades de pointes after acute therapy.
catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia
beta-blockers
Medical therapy for catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia includes the use of beta-blockers for both acute and chronic treatment.[27]van der Werf C, Zwinderman AH, Wilde AA. Therapeutic approach for patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: state of the art and future developments. Europace. 2012 Feb;14(2):175-83. [Erratum in: Europace. 2012 Dec;14(12):1810.] http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/content/14/2/175.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21893508?tool=bestpractice.com [35]Napolitano C, Priori SG. Diagnosis and treatment of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm. 2007 May;4(5):675-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17467641?tool=bestpractice.com
High dose of beta-blockers is usually required.
Other treatment strategies have been proposed, including a stepwise addition of alternate treatment options, such as calcium-channel blockers and flecainide, to beta-blockers in patients who do not respond sufficiently or who cannot tolerate beta-blockers. Left cardiac sympathetic denervation appears to be effective, but has only been tested on small cohorts, and is not universally available.[27]van der Werf C, Zwinderman AH, Wilde AA. Therapeutic approach for patients with catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia: state of the art and future developments. Europace. 2012 Feb;14(2):175-83. [Erratum in: Europace. 2012 Dec;14(12):1810.] http://europace.oxfordjournals.org/content/14/2/175.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21893508?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
nadolol: consult specialist for guidance on dose
implantable cardioverter defibrillator
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) insertion is needed in patients with recurrent syncope despite beta-blockers, or those who are survivors of cardiac arrest, especially in the setting of coronary artery disease. ICDs should not be implanted without concomitant beta-blocker therapy, as ICD shocks will increase catecholamine surge, potentially leading to a vicious cycle of ventricular arrhythmias and ICD shocks.
ICD therapy provides a continuous monitor for the cardiac rhythm and the capability of terminating ventricular tachycardia by overdrive pacing and/or cardioversion defibrillation.
ICD implant requires surgery and is associated with a small risk of procedural mortality. The long-term risks of ICD therapy include device malfunction, infection, and/or inappropriate shocks. Risk factors for infection include comorbid conditions such as diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as well as oral anticoagulation therapy and corticosteroid use. Measures such as antibiotic prophylaxis and good patient education on wound care can help reduce risk.[49]Blomström-Lundqvist C, Traykov V, Erba PA, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections - endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Europace. 2020 Apr 1;22(4):515-49. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/22/4/515/5614580?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31702000?tool=bestpractice.com ICD shocks can be painful and if frequent may impair the patient's quality of life.[43]Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, et al. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 20;352(3):225-37. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa043399#t=article http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15659722?tool=bestpractice.com [44]Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov 27;337(22):1576-83. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199711273372202#t=article http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9411221?tool=bestpractice.com [45]Connolly SJ, Gent M, Roberts RS, et al. Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS): a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone. Circulation. 2000 Mar 21;101(11):1297-302. http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/101/11/1297.full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10725290?tool=bestpractice.com [50]Hammill SC, Stevenson LW, Kadish AH, et al. Review of the registry's first year, data collected, and future plans. Heart Rhythm. 2007 Sep;4(9):1260-3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17765637?tool=bestpractice.com
hemodynamically stable nonidiopathic sustained ventricular tachycardia
antiarrhythmic medications + treatment of reversible cause (if present)
The group of patients discussed here as nonidiopathic include those with identifiable reversible causes for ventricular tachycardia (VT) as well as those in whom there are no identifiable causes. Idiopathic VT (although defined as occurring in the absence of structural heart disease, known genetic disorder, drug toxicity, or electrolyte imbalance) is identifiable by electrophysiologic testing and response to certain medications. Therefore, in the case of VTs, idiopathic VT refers to a specific subtype of tachycardias that are defined and identifiable.
Antiarrhythmic medications are useful in the acute management of hemodynamically stable VT. Before initiating antiarrhythmic drug therapy for a wide complex tachycardia, it is important to be confident in the diagnosis and to make sure that the patient is not experiencing supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with aberrant conduction. Conversely, the diagnosis of SVT with aberrancy should also be made carefully, as certain medications (e.g., verapamil, diltiazem) can exacerbate the clinical situation by worsening the patient’s hemodynamic status if the actual arrhythmia is VT.
According to the American Heart Association (AHA), intravenous adenosine can be considered to aid in treatment and diagnosis when the cause of the regular, monomorphic rhythm cannot be determined.[34]Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, et al; Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support Writing Group. Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S366-468. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081529?tool=bestpractice.com Other antiarrhythmic drugs may also be considered in the acute management of stable VT. The AHA recommends intravenous procainamide or intravenous amiodarone.[34]Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, et al; Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support Writing Group. Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S366-468. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081529?tool=bestpractice.com Intravenous procainamide has been shown to be more efficacious than intravenous amiodarone in terminating wide complex tachycardia (67% vs. 38%, respectively; P = 0.026), and was associated with fewer adverse events.[39]Ortiz M, Martín A, Arribas F, et al. Randomized comparison of intravenous procainamide vs. intravenous amiodarone for the acute treatment of tolerated wide QRS tachycardia: the PROCAMIO study. Eur Heart J. 2017 May 1;38(17):1329-35. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/eurheartj/ehw230 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27354046?tool=bestpractice.com However, procainamide may be more proarrhythmic and should be used with caution in the setting of baseline QT prolongation.[34]Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, et al; Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support Writing Group. Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S366-468. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081529?tool=bestpractice.com
In patients with an identifiable reversible cause of VT (e.g., ischemia, myocardial infarction, toxicity, drug overdose) management will also involve treatment of the reversible cause.[1]Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M, et al. 2022 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 21;43(40):3997-4126. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/43/40/3997/6675633?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36017572?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
adenosine: 6 mg intravenously initially, followed by 12 mg every 1-2 minutes for up to 2 doses according to response
OR
procainamide: 10-17 mg/kg (20-30 mg/minute) intravenous infusion initially (or 100 mg intravenously every 5 minutes), followed by 1-4 mg/minute infusion, adjust dose according to response, maximum 9 g/day (maintenance)
Secondary options
amiodarone: 150 mg intravenous infusion given over 10 minutes initially, followed by 1 mg/minute for 6 hours, followed by 0.5 mg/minute for 18 hours
synchronized cardioversion ± antiarrhythmic medications
In patients who do not respond to the initial acute treatment with antiarrhythmic therapy, synchronized electrical cardioversion is an important treatment for hemodynamically tolerated sustained (monomorphic) ventricular tachycardia (VT). Among patients who fail an initial attempt at synchronized cardioversion, antiarrhythmic medications such as amiodarone or lidocaine may be administered prior to additional attempts at cardioversion.
Synchronized cardioversion should be considered before attempting antiarrhythmic drug therapy in patients who are highly symptomatic (particularly those with symptoms of diminished cerebral perfusion), even if they have apparently stable hemodynamics.
Advanced cardiac life support guidelines recommend giving amiodarone or lidocaine, then synchronized cardioversion.[34]Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, et al; Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support Writing Group. Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S366-468. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081529?tool=bestpractice.com
In patients with an identifiable reversible cause of VT (e.g., ischemia, myocardial infarction, toxicity, drug overdose) management will also involve ongoing treatment of the reversible cause.[1]Zeppenfeld K, Tfelt-Hansen J, de Riva M, et al. 2022 ESC guidelines for the management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death. Eur Heart J. 2022 Oct 21;43(40):3997-4126. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/43/40/3997/6675633?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36017572?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
amiodarone: 150 mg intravenous infusion given over 10 minutes initially, followed by 1 mg/minute for 6 hours, followed by 0.5 mg/minute for 18 hours
Secondary options
lidocaine: 1 to 1.5 mg/kg intravenously initially, followed by 1-4 mg/minute infusion
hemodynamically stable idiopathic sustained ventricular tachycardia
intravenous antiarrhythmic medications
Idiopathic ventricular tachycardias (VTs) are several distinct entities of VT that occur in the absence of structural heart disease, known genetic disorder, drug toxicity, or electrolyte imbalance, but are identifiable by electrophysiologic testing and response to certain medications. Therefore, in the case of VTs, idiopathic VT refers to a specific subtype of tachycardias that are defined and identifiable. These conditions require specific treatment, and seeking specialist help is recommended.
Specific types of idiopathic VT characteristically respond to specific medications, a feature that is useful for diagnostic as well as therapeutic purposes in the acute setting. Idiopathic outflow tract VT can be terminated with a bolus of adenosine. Outflow tract tachycardias may also respond to beta-blockade or to vagal maneuvers.
Fascicular VT characteristically responds to verapamil, but the drug should be used with extreme caution due to the risk of hypotension and hemodynamic collapse if given to other forms of VT.
In cases refractory to adenosine or verapamil, idiopathic VT can be treated with antiarrhythmic medications (lidocaine, amiodarone); if necessary, synchronized electrical cardioversion may be performed.[34]Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, et al; Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support Writing Group. Part 3: adult basic and advanced life support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S366-468. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081529?tool=bestpractice.com
If the patient is not already being managed by a specialist, following successful termination of the tachycardia and stabilization, he or she should be referred to a specialist (electrophysiologist) for further management.
Primary options
Outflow tract VT
adenosine: 6 mg intravenously initially, followed by 12 mg every 1-2 minutes for up to 2 doses according to response
OR
Fascicular VT
verapamil: 5-10 mg intravenously initially, followed by 10 mg after 30 minutes if no adequate response seen, maximum 20 mg total dose
OR
Outflow tract VT
metoprolol tartrate: 5 mg intravenously initially, repeat every 2 minutes according to response, maximum 15 mg total dose
Secondary options
amiodarone: 150 mg intravenous infusion given over 10 minutes, followed by 1 mg/minute for 6 hours, followed by 0.5 mg/minute for 18 hours
OR
lidocaine: 1 to 1.5 mg/kg intravenously as a single dose
synchronized cardioversion
In patients with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia who have failed to respond to antiarrhythmic drug therapy, synchronized electrical cardioversion should be considered. Earlier use of cardioversion may be warranted in patients who are highly symptomatic (particularly with symptoms of diminished cerebral perfusion) despite apparently stable hemodynamics.
If the patient is not already being managed by a specialist, following successful termination of the tachycardia and stabilization, he or she should be referred to a specialist (electrophysiologist) for further management.
nonidiopathic: at high risk for ventricular tachycardia or history of sustained ventricular tachycardia/cardiac arrest without identifiable reversible cause
implantable cardioverter defibrillator
The group of patients discussed here as nonidiopathic include those with identifiable reversible causes for ventricular tachycardia (VT) as well as those in whom there are no identifiable causes. Idiopathic VT (although defined as occurring in the absence of structural heart disease, known genetic disorder, drug toxicity, or electrolyte imbalance) is identifiable by electrophysiologic (EP) testing and response to certain medications. Therefore, in the case of VTs, idiopathic VT refers to a specific subtype of tachycardias that are defined and identifiable. This is different from tachycardias with no identifiable cause, in which the patient would have no signs of a definitive cause for the VT or signs of an idiopathic VT.
Patients at high risk for VT for which implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation is the recommended initial treatment/preventive measure include those with: ischemic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] ≤35%, or ≤40% with nonsustained VT and inducible VT during EP); nonischemic cardiomyopathy (LVEF ≤35% and New York Heart Association class II or III symptoms); hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with one or more of the following high-risk features: 1) family history of sudden death from HCM; 2) massive left ventricular hypertrophy (wall thickness ≥30 mm); 3) unexplained syncope; 4) left ventricular systolic dysfunction; 5) left ventricular apical aneurysm; 6) extensive late gadolinium enhancement on cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging; 7) frequent, longer, and faster runs of nonsustained VT; or congenital arrhythmia syndromes, including long QT syndrome and Brugada syndrome with high-risk features.[8]Arbelo E, Protonotarios A, Gimeno JR, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of cardiomyopathies. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 1;44(37):3503-626. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/37/3503/7246608 [9]Ommen SR, Ho CY, Asif IM, et al. 2024 AHA/ACC/AMSSM/HRS/PACES/SCMR guideline for the management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation. 2024 Jun 4;149(23):e1239-311. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001250 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38718139?tool=bestpractice.com
ICD therapy provides a continuous monitor for the cardiac rhythm and the capability of terminating VT by overdrive pacing and/or cardioversion defibrillation.
ICD therapy has become the most important treatment to reduce mortality among high-risk patients, with a 30% to 40% relative risk reduction in cardiac death with ICD therapy. Medications have been shown to be less efficacious than ICDs in reducing the burden of malignant ventricular arrhythmias in high-risk patients and are considered adjunctive therapy for managing these conditions.
ICDs have been shown to be more effective than antiarrhythmic medications in reducing overall mortality in cardiac arrest survivors who did not have reversible causes of cardiac arrest, including toxic/metabolic abnormalities, trauma, and acute ischemia. ICD implantation is contraindicated in such cases when correction of the disorder is considered feasible and likely to substantially reduce the risk of recurrence.
ICD implant requires surgery and is associated with a small risk of procedural mortality. The long-term risks of ICD therapy include device malfunction, infection, and/or inappropriate shocks. Risk factors for infection include comorbid conditions such as diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, as well as oral anticoagulation therapy and corticosteroid use. Measures such as antibiotic prophylaxis and good patient education on wound care can help reduce risk.[49]Blomström-Lundqvist C, Traykov V, Erba PA, et al. European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) international consensus document on how to prevent, diagnose, and treat cardiac implantable electronic device infections - endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) and the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Europace. 2020 Apr 1;22(4):515-49. https://academic.oup.com/europace/article/22/4/515/5614580?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31702000?tool=bestpractice.com ICD shocks can be painful and if frequent may impair the patient's quality of life.[43]Bardy GH, Lee KL, Mark DB, et al. Amiodarone or an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator for congestive heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jan 20;352(3):225-37. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa043399#t=article http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15659722?tool=bestpractice.com [44]Antiarrhythmics versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Investigators. A comparison of antiarrhythmic-drug therapy with implantable defibrillators in patients resuscitated from near-fatal ventricular arrhythmias. N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov 27;337(22):1576-83. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199711273372202#t=article http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9411221?tool=bestpractice.com [45]Connolly SJ, Gent M, Roberts RS, et al. Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS): a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone. Circulation. 2000 Mar 21;101(11):1297-302. http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/101/11/1297.full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10725290?tool=bestpractice.com [50]Hammill SC, Stevenson LW, Kadish AH, et al. Review of the registry's first year, data collected, and future plans. Heart Rhythm. 2007 Sep;4(9):1260-3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17765637?tool=bestpractice.com
antiarrhythmic medication
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Antiarrhythmic drugs may be useful as adjunctive therapies for high-risk patients already implanted with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or for whom ICD therapy is not an option.[7]Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 2;72(14):e91-220. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29097296?tool=bestpractice.com However, randomized trials have shown that currently available oral antiarrhythmic drugs, other than beta-blockers, do not prolong life when used chronically in the treatment of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death.[7]Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 2;72(14):e91-220. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29097296?tool=bestpractice.com Some antiarrhythmic medications may be inappropriate for patients with structural heart disease because of their negative inotropic properties and increased risk of causing ventricular tachycardia. Amiodarone can increase defibrillation thresholds and, therefore, potentially impair ICD function.[53]Hohnloser SH, Dorian P, Roberts R, et al, Effect of amiodarone and sotalol on ventricular defibrillation threshold: the Optimal Pharmacological Therapy in Cardioverter/Defibrillator Patients (OPTIC) Trial. Circulation. 2006 Jul 11;114(2):104-9. http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/114/2/104.full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16818810?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
mexiletine: 200 mg orally every 8 hours
OR
flecainide: 100-150 mg orally twice daily
OR
propafenone: 150-300 mg orally (immediate-release) every 8 hours; or 225-425 mg orally (extended-release) every 12 hours
OR
sotalol: 80-160 mg orally twice daily
OR
amiodarone: 800-1600 mg/day orally given in single or divided doses for 1-3 weeks, followed by 600-800 mg/day given in single or divided doses for 4 weeks, followed by 200-400 mg/day given in single or divided doses
antiarrhythmic monotherapy
Antiarrhythmic drugs may be useful as adjunctive therapies for high-risk patients already implanted with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) or for whom ICD therapy is not an option.[7]Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 2;72(14):e91-220. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29097296?tool=bestpractice.com However, randomized trials have shown that currently available oral antiarrhythmic drugs, other than beta-blockers, do not prolong life when used chronically in the treatment of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and sudden death.[7]Al-Khatib SM, Stevenson WG, Ackerman MJ, et al. 2017 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for management of patients with ventricular arrhythmias and the prevention of sudden cardiac death: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Oct 2;72(14):e91-220. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29097296?tool=bestpractice.com Antiarrhythmic medications may be inappropriate for patients with structural heart disease because of their negative inotropic properties and increased risk of causing ventricular tachycardia. Amiodarone can increase defibrillator thresholds and, therefore, potentially impair ICD function.[53]Hohnloser SH, Dorian P, Roberts R, et al, Effect of amiodarone and sotalol on ventricular defibrillation threshold: the Optimal Pharmacological Therapy in Cardioverter/Defibrillator Patients (OPTIC) Trial. Circulation. 2006 Jul 11;114(2):104-9. http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/114/2/104.full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16818810?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
mexiletine: 200 mg orally every 8 hours
OR
flecainide: 100-150 mg orally twice daily
OR
propafenone: 150-300 mg orally (immediate-release) every 8 hours
OR
sotalol: 80-160 mg orally twice daily
OR
amiodarone: 800-1600 mg/day orally given in single or divided doses for 1-3 weeks, followed by 600-800 mg/day given in single or divided doses for 4 weeks, followed by 200-400 mg/day given in single or divided doses
catheter ablation
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Catheter ablation may also be used as a palliative measure in patients with structural heart disease experiencing recurrent episodes of ventricular tachycardia.[40]Cronin EM, Bogun FM, Maury P, et al. 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. J Arrhythm. 2019 May 10;35(3):323-484. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595359 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293696?tool=bestpractice.com [54]Stevenson WG, Khan H, Sager P, et al. Identification of reentry circuit sites during catheter mapping and radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardia late after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 1993 Oct;88(4 Pt 1):1647-70. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8403311?tool=bestpractice.com
idiopathic ventricular tachycardia
specialist referral for ongoing antiarrhythmic treatment
Idiopathic ventricular tachycardias (VTs) are several distinct entities of VT that occur in the absence of structural heart disease, known genetic disorder, drug toxicity, or electrolyte imbalance, but are identifiable by electrophysiologic testing and response to certain medications. Therefore, in the case of VTs, idiopathic VT refers to a specific subtype of tachycardias that are defined and identifiable. These conditions require specific treatment, and seeking specialist help is recommended.
beta-blockers or calcium-channel blockers or catheter ablation
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
In ongoing therapy for patients with idiopathic ventricular tachycardia and mild-to-moderate symptoms, beta-blockers or calcium-channel blockers usually provide sufficient treatment.
In terms of the choice of calcium-channel blockers, verapamil is usually used, with diltiazem as another option.
It is a matter of physician and patient preference in deciding between medications and ablation in this setting.[40]Cronin EM, Bogun FM, Maury P, et al. 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. J Arrhythm. 2019 May 10;35(3):323-484. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595359 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293696?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
metoprolol tartrate: 50-200 mg/day orally (immediate-release) given in 2 divided doses
OR
atenolol: 25 to 100 mg orally once daily
OR
verapamil: 180-240 mg/day orally (immediate-release) given in 3-4 divided doses; 180-240 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
OR
diltiazem: 90-360 mg/day orally (immediate-release) given in 3-4 divided doses; 90-360 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
catheter ablation
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
In ongoing therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe symptoms or with associated cardiomyopathy, catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia should be considered as first line. Catheter ablation is also indicated in patients in whom beta-blockers and/or calcium-channel blockers are ineffective or poorly tolerated.[40]Cronin EM, Bogun FM, Maury P, et al. 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. J Arrhythm. 2019 May 10;35(3):323-484. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595359 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293696?tool=bestpractice.com
It is also reasonable as first-line therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate symptoms who prefer not to take medications.
class I or class III antiarrhythmic medications
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
In ongoing therapy, antiarrhythmic agents, including class I drugs (mexiletine, flecainide, and propafenone) and class III agents (amiodarone and sotalol), may be used in patients who fail therapy with beta-blockers and/or calcium-channel blockers and who are not candidates for catheter ablation or in whom catheter ablation is ineffective.[40]Cronin EM, Bogun FM, Maury P, et al. 2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias. J Arrhythm. 2019 May 10;35(3):323-484. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6595359 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31293696?tool=bestpractice.com [41]Morin DP, Lerman BB. Management of ventricular tachycardia in the absence of structural heart disease. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2007 Oct;9(5):356-63. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17897564?tool=bestpractice.com
Medication choice is usually based on individual patient/physician preference.
Primary options
mexiletine: 200 mg orally every 8 hours
OR
flecainide: 100-200 mg orally twice daily
OR
propafenone: 150 to 350 mg orally (immediate-release) every 8 hours
OR
sotalol: 80-160 mg orally twice daily
Secondary options
amiodarone: 200 mg/day orally given in single or divided doses
Choose a patient group to see our recommendations
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups. See disclaimer
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer