All pregnant women should be seen regularly throughout their pregnancy, and have their blood pressure (BP) measured.[65]U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Final recommendation statement: hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: screening. Sep 2023 [internet publication].
https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/hypertensive-disorders-pregnancy-screening
If hypertension (defined as systolic BP ≥140 mmHg and/or diastolic BP ≥90 mmHg) is found, and preeclampsia suspected, urinalysis is recommended.[65]U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Final recommendation statement: hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: screening. Sep 2023 [internet publication].
https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/recommendation/hypertensive-disorders-pregnancy-screening
If high blood pressure persists, there should be a step-up in care to an assessment center or admission to a care facility, depending on findings and symptoms.
Uterine artery Doppler is not recommended as a stand-alone screening tool for predicting the onset of disease.[1]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 222: gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Jun 2020 [internet publication].
https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-bulletin/articles/2020/06/gestational-hypertension-and-preeclampsia
[16]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management. Apr 2023 [internet publication].
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng133
[54]Society of Obstetric Medicine of Australia and New Zealand. Hypertension in pregnancy guideline. 2024 [internet publication].
https://www.somanz.org/hypertension-in-pregnancy-guideline-2023
[66]Sotiriadis A, Hernandez-Andrade E, da Silva Costa F, et al; ISUOG CSC Pre-eclampsia Task Force. ISUOG practice guidelines: role of ultrasound in screening for and follow-up of pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jan;53(1):7-22.
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/uog.20105
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30320479?tool=bestpractice.com
Screening for preeclampsia by identifying women in the first trimester with risk factors for the disease is advocated by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence.[16]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hypertension in pregnancy: diagnosis and management. Apr 2023 [internet publication].
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng133
Meta-analyses have shown a 53% risk reduction in pregnant women who are at moderate or high risk for developing preeclampsia who are picked up by screening through prenatal care and offered aspirin prophylaxis from 12 to 16 weeks’ gestation.[67]Bartsch E, Medcalf KE, Park AL, et al. Clinical risk factors for pre-eclampsia determined in early pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis of large cohort studies. BMJ. 2016 Apr 19;353:i1753.
https://www.bmj.com/content/353/bmj.i1753.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27094586?tool=bestpractice.com
Prediction algorithms that use a combination of biomarkers and maternal history have also been evaluated for their potential as first-trimester screening tools for preeclampsia.[68]Kuc S, Wortelboer EJ, van Rijn BB, et al. Evaluation of 7 serum biomarkers and uterine artery Doppler ultrasound for first-trimester prediction of preeclampsia: a systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2011 Apr;66(4):225-39.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21756405?tool=bestpractice.com
[69]Skråstad RB, Hov GG, Blaas HG, et al. Risk assessment for preeclampsia in nulliparous women at 11-13 weeks gestational age: prospective evaluation of two algorithms. BJOG. 2015 Dec;122(13):1781-8.
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/1471-0528.13194
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25471057?tool=bestpractice.com
In the ASPRE trial, >26,000 women with singleton pregnancies were screened with an algorithm that combined known maternal risk factors with mean arterial pressure (MAP), the uterine-artery pulsatility index (UTPI), and maternal serum placental growth factor (PlGF) and pregnancy-associated plasma protein A (PAPP-A) taken at 11 to 13 weeks’ gestation.[41]Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LC, et al. Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia. N Engl J Med. 2017 Aug 17;377(7):613-22.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1704559
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28657417?tool=bestpractice.com
After adjustment for the effect of aspirin, detection rates for preterm and term preeclampsia were 77% and 43%, respectively, with a false-positive rate of 9.2%.[70]Rolnik DL, Wright D, Poon LCY, et al. ASPRE trial: performance of screening for preterm pre-eclampsia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Oct;50(4):492-5.
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/uog.18816
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28741785?tool=bestpractice.com
The Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) recommends that all women should be screened for preterm preeclampsia using a first‐trimester combined test as a one‐step procedure.[20]Poon LC, Shennan A, Hyett JA, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: a pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 May;145 Suppl 1:1-33.
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ijgo.12802
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31111484?tool=bestpractice.com
FIGO suggests that the optimal test includes maternal risk factors and measurements of MAP, serum PlGF, and UPTI. If it is not possible to measure PlGF and/or UTPI, the baseline screening test should be a combination of maternal risk factors with MAP, and not maternal risk factors alone. An algorithm tool derived from these factors, with the option to include serum PAPP-A, is available.
The Fetal Medicine Foundation: risk for preeclampsia assessment
Opens in new window If resources are limited, FIGO suggests routine screening for preterm preeclampsia by maternal factors and MAP should be performed in all pregnancies.[20]Poon LC, Shennan A, Hyett JA, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: a pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2019 May;145 Suppl 1:1-33.
https://obgyn.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ijgo.12802
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31111484?tool=bestpractice.com
Although the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the sFlt-1/PlGF test to aid risk assessment for the progression to preeclampsia with severe features, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists does not recommend any single biomarker test (e.g., PlGF testing or the sFlt-1/PlGF ratio) for the prediction of preeclampsia, diagnosis or exclusion of preeclampsia with severe features, or determination of the management approach after a positive or negative test result.[1]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin no. 222: gestational hypertension and preeclampsia. Jun 2020 [internet publication].
https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-bulletin/articles/2020/06/gestational-hypertension-and-preeclampsia
[60]American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Biomarker prediction of preeclampsia with severe features. Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jun;143(6):p e153-4.
A lack of screening availability may lead to a more acute presentation of preeclampsia, with increased risk of clinical sequelae.