Induction chemotherapy
Induction chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) significantly improved both progression-free survival and overall survival in a phase 3 trial of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer.[183]McCormack M, Gallardo Rincón D, Eminowicz G. A randomised phase III trial of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation compared with chemoradiation alone in locally advanced cervical cancer: the GCIG INTERLACE trial. Ann Oncol. 2023;34(suppl)2S1-2:S1276.
https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(23)04172-8/fulltext
[184]McCormack M, Eminowicz G, Gallardo D, et al. Induction chemotherapy followed by standard chemoradiotherapy versus standard chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (GCIG INTERLACE): an international, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2024 Oct 19;404(10462):1525-35.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01438-7/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39419054?tool=bestpractice.com
The trial, which randomized patients with stages IB1 node positive, IB2, II, IIIB, and IVA cervical cancer to induction chemotherapy (carboplatin and paclitaxel) followed by chemoradiation or to chemoradiation alone, reported 5-year progression-free survival of 72% versus 64% and 5-year overall survival of 80% and 72% favoring induction chemotherapy.[184]McCormack M, Eminowicz G, Gallardo D, et al. Induction chemotherapy followed by standard chemoradiotherapy versus standard chemoradiotherapy alone in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (GCIG INTERLACE): an international, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2024 Oct 19;404(10462):1525-35.
https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(24)01438-7/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39419054?tool=bestpractice.com
Novel agents targeted against PIK3CA mutations
PIK3CA mutations are present in up to 36% of advanced or recurrent tumors.[185]Janku F, Wheler JJ, Westin SN, et al. PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors in patients with breast and gynecologic malignancies harboring PIK3CA mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Mar 10;30(8):777-82.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3295566
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22271473?tool=bestpractice.com
In a first-in-human phase Ia study, alpelisib, an oral phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase α (PI3Kα)-selective inhibitor, demonstrated a tolerable safety profile and preliminary activity in patients with PIK3CA-altered solid tumors, including cervical cancer.[186]Juric D, Rodon J, Tabernero J, et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase α-selective inhibition with alpelisib (BYL719) in PIK3CA-altered solid tumors: results from the first-in-human study. J Clin Oncol. 2018 May 1;36(13):1291-9.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7107?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29401002?tool=bestpractice.com
Axalimogene filolisbac
Axalimogene filolisbac (a live attenuated Listeria monocytogenes-based immunotherapy that generates T cells against human papillomavirus E7-transformed cells) has shown promise in early clinical trials in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer.[187]Wallecha A, French C, Petit R, et al. Lm-LLO-based immunotherapies and HPV-associated disease. J Oncol. 2012;2012:542851.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3307007
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22481930?tool=bestpractice.com
[188]Basu P, Mehta AO, Jain MM, et al. ADXS11-001 immunotherapy targeting HPV-E7: final results from a phase 2 study in Indian women with recurrent cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:5(suppl);5610.[189]Huh WK, Dizon DS, Powell MA, et al. ADXS11-001 immunotherapy in squamous or non-squamous persistent/recurrent metastatic cervical cancer: results from stage I of the phase II GOG/NRG0265 study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:S5516.
https://meetinglibrary.asco.org/record/125327/abstract
[190]Basu P, Mehta A, Jain M, et al. A randomized phase 2 study of ADXS11-001 Listeria monocytogenes-listeriolysin O immunotherapy with or without cisplatin in treatment of advanced cervical cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2018 May;28(4):764-72.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5929492
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29538258?tool=bestpractice.com
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted fast-track designation to axalimogene filolisbac for adjuvant therapy of high-risk, locally advanced cervical cancer. A European marketing application for axalimogene filolisbac for cervical cancer was withdrawn in July 2018 due to a lack of adequate data to support the application, rather than for safety reasons.
Immune checkpoint inhibition: programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4)
Combination therapy, targeting both PD-1 and CTLA-4, has the potential to augment treatment effect. The PD-1/CTLA-4 bi-specific antibody, cadonilimab, has been approved for use in patients with relapsed or metastatic cervical cancer in China.[191]Keam SJ. Cadonilimab: First Approval. Drugs. 2022 Aug;82(12):1333-39.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35986837?tool=bestpractice.com
One phase 3 trial of cadonilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer demonstrated improved progression-free survival and overall survival compared with platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. The median progression-free survival for the cadonilimab group was 12.7 months versus 8.1 months for the placebo group. The median overall survival was not reached for the cadonilimab group (median follow-up of 25.6 months) compared with 22.8 months for the placebo group.[192]Wu X, Sun Y, Yang H, et al. Cadonilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab as first-line treatment for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer (COMPASSION-16): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial in China. Lancet. 2024 Oct 26;404(10463):1668-76.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39426385?tool=bestpractice.com
VGX-3100
VGX-3100 (a synthetic DNA vaccine targeting the human papillomavirus E1 and E7 proteins) has shown efficacy against high-grade dysplasia (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3) in an early clinical trial.[193]Trimble CL, Morrow MP, Kraynyak KA, et al. Safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of VGX-3100, a therapeutic synthetic DNA vaccine targeting human papillomavirus 16 and 18 E6 and E7 proteins for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet. 2015 Nov 21;386(10008):2078-88.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4888059
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26386540?tool=bestpractice.com
Response durability of up to 1.5 years following dosing has been reported.[194]Bhuyan PK, Dallas M, Kraynyak K, et al. Durability of response to VGX-3100 treatment of HPV16/18 positive cervical HSIL. Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2021 May 4;17(5):1288-93.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21645515.2020.1823778
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33175656?tool=bestpractice.com
Adoptive T-cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes
Preliminary results from a phase 2 study suggest that adoptive T-cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) selected for human papillomavirus E6- and E7-oncogene reactivity (HPV-TIL) can induce durable, complete regression of metastatic cervical cancer.[195]Stevanović S, Draper LM, Langhan MM, et al. Complete regression of metastatic cervical cancer after treatment with human papillomavirus-targeted tumor-infiltrating T cells. J Clin Oncol. 2015 May 10;33(14):1543-50.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4417725
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25823737?tool=bestpractice.com
The FDA has granted breakthrough therapy designation to autologous TIL immunotherapy LN-145 for the treatment of recurrent, metastatic, or persistent cervical cancer.
Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy
Meta-analysis suggests that intensive neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery is associated with some impact on survival compared with surgery alone. However, methodologic challenges to the analysis and the lack of clinical codification has prevented it becoming a standard approach.[196]Rydzewska L, Tierney J, Vale CL, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus
surgery versus surgery for cervical cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;(12):CD007406.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007406.pub3/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23235641?tool=bestpractice.com
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery does not appear to offer a survival advantage over chemoradiation therapy for patients with stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer.[197]Zou W, Han Y, Zhang Y, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in stage IB2-IIB cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2019;14(11):e0225264.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0225264
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31725793?tool=bestpractice.com
[198]Marchetti C, Fagotti A, Tombolini V, et al. Survival and toxicity in neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery versus definitive chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Treat Rev. 2020 Feb;83:101945.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31838220?tool=bestpractice.com
Adjuvant chemotherapy is being investigated in international clinical trials for patients with high-risk or advanced stage disease.
[
]
How does adjuvant chemotherapy after concurrent chemoradiation affect outcomes in women with locally advanced cervical cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.930/fullShow me the answer