Optimal diabetes care requires a long-term relationship with the patient, appropriate use of attending physicians when needed, and regular monitoring and control of blood pressure, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), tobacco use, and statin/aspirin use. Most patients require diabetes assessments every 3-4 months, and some patients may benefit from more frequent (monthly) visits, especially when motivated to improve their care.
Use of diabetes care and education specialists is recommended, although traditional information-based diabetes patient education mandated by some professional organizations has been shown to be only moderately effective in randomized studies.[428]Norris SL, Nichols PJ, Caspersen CJ, et al. Increasing diabetes self-management education in community settings: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002 May;22(suppl 4):39-66.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11985934?tool=bestpractice.com
[429]Powers MA, Bardsley J, Cypress M, et al. Diabetes self-management education and support in type 2 diabetes: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Diabetes Care. 2015 Jul;38(7):1372-82.
https://care.diabetesjournals.org/content/38/7/1372.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26048904?tool=bestpractice.com
A multidisciplinary team with access to nurses, educators, dietitians, clinical pharmacists, psychologists, and other specialists as needed is recommended. Patient readiness to change is a strong predictor of improved care, and readiness to change may vary across the clinical domains of blood pressure, statin use, aspirin use, glucose, smoking, physical activity, and nutrition. Rapid assessment of readiness to change, and directing care to the domain with maximum potential to change, is advised.[430]Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Rossi JS, et al. Stages of change and decisional balance for 12 problem behaviors. Health Psychol. 1994 Jan;13(1):39-46.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8168470?tool=bestpractice.com
The American Diabetes Association recommends measurement of glycemic status by HbA1c and/or appropriate continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics at least twice a year. More frequent assessment (e.g., every 3 months) is recommended for individuals not meeting treatment goals, those whose therapy has recently changed, and those with frequent or severe hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia, changing health status, or growth and development in youth.[2]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2024. Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(suppl 1):S1-321.
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/47/Supplement_1
The use of point-of-care HbA1c testing may provide an opportunity for more timely treatment changes during encounters between individuals with diabetes and healthcare professionals.[2]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2024. Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(suppl 1):S1-321.
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/47/Supplement_1
Fructosamine and glycated albumin are alternative measures of glycemia that are approved for clinical use for monitoring glycemic status. Fructosamine reflects total glycated serum proteins (mostly albumin). Glycated albumin assays reflect the proportion of total albumin that is glycated. Due to the turnover rate of serum protein, fructosamine and glycated albumin reflect glycemia over the past 2-4 weeks, a shorter-term time frame than that of HbA1c. However, there have been few clinical trials, and the evidence base supporting the use of these biomarkers to monitor glycemic status is much weaker than that for HbA1c. They may be useful in people with diabetes who have conditions where the interpretation of HbA1c may be problematic or when HbA1c cannot be measured (e.g., homozygous hemoglobin variants).[2]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2024. Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(suppl 1):S1-321.
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/47/Supplement_1
Self-management by regular blood glucose monitoring is not routinely recommended in patients with type 2 diabetes, because it does not significantly improve glycemic control, health-related quality of life, or hypoglycemia rates.[431]Young LA, Buse JB, Weaver MA, et al; Monitor Trial Group. Glucose self-monitoring in non-insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care settings: a randomized trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Jul 1;177(7):920-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28600913?tool=bestpractice.com
[432]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Type 2 diabetes in adults: management. Jun 2022 [internet publication].
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng28
[Evidence C]b4311e29-592d-4616-87d1-c2ca310323c9guidelineCWhat are the effects of self-management by regular blood glucose monitoring in people with type 2 diabetes?[432]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Type 2 diabetes in adults: management. Jun 2022 [internet publication].
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng28
However, it is recommended for those who (a) are on insulin; (b) have had prior hypoglycemic episodes; (c) drive or operate machinery and use oral medications that increase his or her risk of hypoglycemia; or (d) are pregnant, or planning to become pregnant.[432]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Type 2 diabetes in adults: management. Jun 2022 [internet publication].
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng28
Blood glucose monitoring may be complicated by cognitive or physical impairments, especially if the patient lacks a support system, and this should be considered when deciding on the method of, and approach to, monitoring.[25]Cappola AR, Auchus RJ, El-Hajj Fuleihan G, et al. Hormones and aging: an Endocrine Society scientific statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Jul 14;108(8):1835-74.
https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/8/1835/7192004
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37326526?tool=bestpractice.com
CGM may be helpful in people with type 2 diabetes (particularly those on insulin therapy) to create a more complete picture of patients' actual glucose status throughout the day and night.[2]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2024. Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(suppl 1):S1-321.
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/47/Supplement_1
[433]Carlson AL, Mullen DM, Bergenstal RM. Clinical use of continuous glucose monitoring in adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 May;19(s2):S4-11.
https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/dia.2017.0024?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28541137?tool=bestpractice.com
[434]Johnson ML, Martens TW, Criego AB, et al. Utilizing the ambulatory glucose profile to standardize and implement continuous glucose monitoring in clinical practice. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Jun;21(s2):S217-25.
https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/10.1089/dia.2019.0034?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31169432?tool=bestpractice.com
It involves a small, disposable device with a subcutaneous sensor constantly attached to the skin, which measures glucose levels in interstitial fluid, and sends the readings to a display device or smart device.[435]Lewis DM, Oser TK, Wheeler BJ. Continuous glucose monitoring. BMJ. 2023 Mar 3;380:e072420.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36868576?tool=bestpractice.com
CGM devices may provide real-time data or intermittently scanned data (commonly referred to as "flash" glucose monitoring). Data from ambulatory glucose profiles show time in range and times of hypoglycemia, which can help support personalized therapy decisions.[103]McCall AL, Lieb DC, Gianchandani R, et al. Management of individuals with diabetes at high risk for hypoglycemia: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Feb 15;108(3):529-62.
https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/3/529/6880627
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477488?tool=bestpractice.com
[436]Carlson AL, Criego AB, Martens TW, et al. HbA1c: the glucose management indicator, time in range, and standardization of continuous glucose monitoring reports in clinical practice. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2020 Mar;49(1):95-107.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31980124?tool=bestpractice.com
CGM devices can also display trend arrows that help patients to anticipate a significant fall or rise in glucose and take timely steps to rectify this.[103]McCall AL, Lieb DC, Gianchandani R, et al. Management of individuals with diabetes at high risk for hypoglycemia: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Feb 15;108(3):529-62.
https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/3/529/6880627
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477488?tool=bestpractice.com
The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology strongly recommends CGM for all persons with diabetes treated with intensive insulin therapy, defined as three or more injections of insulin per day or the use of an insulin pump.[437]Grunberger G, Sherr J, Allende M, et al. American Association of Clinical Endocrinology clinical practice guideline: the use of advanced technology in the management of persons with diabetes mellitus. Endocr Pract. 2021 Jun;27(6):505-37.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34116789?tool=bestpractice.com
Real-time CGM is also recommended by the Endocrine Society for those taking insulin or sulfonylureas who have significant risk for hypoglycemia.[103]McCall AL, Lieb DC, Gianchandani R, et al. Management of individuals with diabetes at high risk for hypoglycemia: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Feb 15;108(3):529-62.
https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/3/529/6880627
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477488?tool=bestpractice.com
In patients with type 2 diabetes treated with insulin, real-time CGM results in better glycemic control and lower rates of hypoglycemia and emergency department visits or hospitalization for hypoglycemia.[103]McCall AL, Lieb DC, Gianchandani R, et al. Management of individuals with diabetes at high risk for hypoglycemia: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Feb 15;108(3):529-62.
https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/3/529/6880627
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477488?tool=bestpractice.com
[438]Karter AJ, Parker MM, Moffet HH, et al. Association of real-time continuous glucose monitoring wWith glycemic control and acute metabolic events among patients with insulin-treated diabetes. JAMA. 2021 Jun 8;325(22):2273-84.
https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.6530
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34077502?tool=bestpractice.com
[439]Reaven PD, Newell M, Rivas S, et al. Initiation of continuous glucose monitoring is linked to improved glycemic control and fewer clinical events in type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the Veterans Health Administration. Diabetes Care. 2023 Apr 1;46(4):854-63.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10260873
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36807492?tool=bestpractice.com
Real-time CGM has also resulted in improvement in glycemic parameters in both users of multiple daily dose insulin and those on basal insulin regimens, compared with blood glucose testing, in randomized controlled trials.[440]Beck RW, Riddlesworth TD, Ruedy K, et al. Continuous glucose monitoring versus usual care in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving multiple daily insulin injections: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 19;167(6):365-74.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28828487?tool=bestpractice.com
[441]Martens T, Beck RW, Bailey R, et al. Effect of continuous glucose monitoring on glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with basal insulin: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021 Jun 8;325(22):2262-72.
https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.7444
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34077499?tool=bestpractice.com
[442]Seidu S, Kunutsor SK, Ajjan RA, et al. Efficacy and safety of continuous glucose monitoring and intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in patients with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional evidence. Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(1):169-79.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38117991?tool=bestpractice.com
Intermittently scanned CGM technology has been shown to decrease hypoglycemia, compared with blood glucose testing, in individuals with type 2 diabetes on multiple daily dose insulin.[443]Haak T, Hanaire H, Ajjan R, et al. Flash glucose-sensing technology as a replacement for blood glucose monitoring for the management of insulin-treated type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, open-label randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Ther. 2017 Feb;8(1):55-73.
https://www.doi.org/10.1007/s13300-016-0223-6
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28000140?tool=bestpractice.com
All patients using CGM should be appropriately educated in the use of their device, know what to do if the device stops working, and be advised that they will still require finger-prick blood glucose sampling sometimes to verify readings.[103]McCall AL, Lieb DC, Gianchandani R, et al. Management of individuals with diabetes at high risk for hypoglycemia: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Feb 15;108(3):529-62.
https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/3/529/6880627
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477488?tool=bestpractice.com
It should also be noted that CGM is not Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved for inpatient use at present, but does have enforcement discretion (i.e., for patients who are at high risk of hypoglycemia).[103]McCall AL, Lieb DC, Gianchandani R, et al. Management of individuals with diabetes at high risk for hypoglycemia: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Feb 15;108(3):529-62.
https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article/108/3/529/6880627
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36477488?tool=bestpractice.com
In addition to care required to achieve recommended levels of blood pressure, statin use, antiplatelet use, tobacco non-use, and glucose control, the following periodic monitoring for complications is advised:[2]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2024. Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(suppl 1):S1-321.
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/47/Supplement_1
Dilated and comprehensive eye exam every year after the initial exam at diagnosis.
Assessment at least annually of renal function including both a urinary albumin excretion test and a serum creatinine test with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) based on the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) creatinine equation (2021) or equivalent.
[
CKD-EPI equations for glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
Opens in new window
]
In people with diabetes and hypertension, if GFR is <60 mL/minute/1.73 m² and/or albuminuria is >30 mg/g creatinine in a spot urine sample, the urinary albumin to creatinine ratio should be repeated every 6 months to assess for change.[98]Sacks DB, Arnold M, Bakris GL, et al. Guidelines and recommendations for laboratory analysis in the diagnosis and management of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2023 Oct 1;46(10):e151-99.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10516260
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37471273?tool=bestpractice.com
Serum creatinine/eGFR and potassium should be checked within 7-14 days of initiation of treatment with an ACE inhibitor, angiotensin-II receptor antagonist, aldosterone antagonist, or diuretic, as well as following uptitration of dose and then at least annually.[2]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2024. Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(suppl 1):S1-321.
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/47/Supplement_1
An annual assessment of liver function tests; liver function tests may also need to be checked after initiation or dose changes of medications that affect laboratory values.
Annually or more frequent foot exams including assessment of ankle reflexes, dorsalis pedis pulse, vibratory sensation, and 10-g monofilament touch sensation. All patients with insensate feet, foot deformities, or a history of foot ulcers should have their feet examined at every visit and are candidates for specialized footwear.
In asymptomatic individuals, routine screening for coronary artery disease is not recommended as it does not improve outcomes as long as risk factors for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) are treated.[2]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2024. Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(suppl 1):S1-321.
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/47/Supplement_1
However, measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal prohormone B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) on at least a yearly basis should be considered to screen asymptomatic adults with diabetes for heart failure (HF).[2]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2024. Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(suppl 1):S1-321.
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/47/Supplement_1
[388]Pop-Busui R, Januzzi JL, Bruemmer D, et al. Heart failure: an underappreciated complication of diabetes. a consensus report of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2022 Jul 7;45(7):1670-90.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9726978
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35796765?tool=bestpractice.com
This is because adults with diabetes are at increased risk for the development of asymptomatic cardiac structural or functional abnormalities (stage B HF) or symptomatic (stage C) HF.[2]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2024. Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(suppl 1):S1-321.
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/47/Supplement_1
If abnormal natriuretic peptide levels are detected, echocardiography is recommended. Identification, risk stratification, and early treatment of risk factors in people with diabetes and asymptomatic stages of HF reduce the risk for progression to symptomatic disease.[2]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2024. Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(suppl 1):S1-321.
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/47/Supplement_1
Due to disease progression, comorbidities, and nonadherence to lifestyle or medication, a substantial fraction of patients who achieve recommended goals for HbA1c, blood pressure, and lipid management relapse to uncontrolled states of one or more of these within 1 year. Relapse is usually asymptomatic; frequent monitoring of clinical parameters is desirable to anticipate or detect relapse early and adjust therapy.
Factors that may lead to loss of adequate glycemic control include medication nonadherence, depression, musculoskeletal injury or worsening arthritis, competing illnesses perceived by the patient as more serious than diabetes, social stress at home or at work, substance abuse, occult infections, use of medications (e.g., corticosteroids, certain depression medications, mood stabilizers, or atypical antipsychotics) that elevate weight or glucose, or other endocrinopathies such as Cushing disease.
Loss of control of blood pressure and lipids is also a common phenomenon. Close monitoring of patients with diabetes through frequent visits and lab work helps to maintain patients at treatment goals and proactively identify upward trends in blood pressure or HbA1c, and to reinforce the importance of statin adherence and nonsmoking. In patients on lipid-lowering therapy, a lipid profile should be checked: at initiation of statins or other lipid-lowering therapy; 4-12 weeks after initiation or a change in dose; and annually thereafter.[2]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2024. Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(suppl 1):S1-321.
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/47/Supplement_1
Due to the increased risk of dementia in patients with diabetes, physicians should closely monitor cognitive function; consider screening for cognitive impairment in older adults with diabetes ages ≥65 years.[2]American Diabetes Association. Standards of care in diabetes - 2024. Diabetes Care. 2024 Jan 1;47(suppl 1):S1-321.
https://diabetesjournals.org/care/issue/47/Supplement_1
[424]Thomassen JQ, Tolstrup JS, Benn M, et al. Type-2 diabetes and risk of dementia: observational and Mendelian randomisation studies in 1 million individuals. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2020 Apr 24;29:e118.
https://www.doi.org/10.1017/S2045796020000347
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32326995?tool=bestpractice.com
[425]Chatterjee S, Peters SA, Woodward M, et al. Type 2 diabetes as a risk factor for dementia in women compared with men: a pooled analysis of 2.3 million people comprising more than 100,000 cases of dementia. Diabetes Care. 2016 Feb;39(2):300-7.
https://www.doi.org/10.2337/dc15-1588
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26681727?tool=bestpractice.com
[444]Reinke C, Buchmann N, Fink A, et al. Diabetes duration and the risk of dementia: a cohort study based on German health claims data. Age Ageing. 2022 Jan 6;51(1):afab231.
https://www.doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afab231
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34923587?tool=bestpractice.com