Unstable angina
- Overview
- Theory
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Follow up
- Resources
Treatment algorithm
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups: see disclaimer
presumed cardiac chest pain
nitrate and/or morphine ± oxygen
All patients with signs/symptoms of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without ST-elevation on ECG should be treated as a presumed diagnosis of non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) until the results of cardiac biomarkers are known.
Pain relief with a sublingual nitrate should be offered as soon as possible. Intravenous nitrates should be considered for all patients who continue to have chest pain. There are no large-scale randomized placebo-controlled trials of nitrate use in unstable angina. However, in multiple small open-label studies intravenous nitrates have been very useful for relief of angina and symptomatic relief.[109]Thadani U, Opie LH. Nitrates for unstable angina. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1994 Oct;8(5):719-26. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7873468?tool=bestpractice.com The main contraindication for their use is hypotension. The major therapeutic benefit is related to the venodilator effects that lead to decrease in myocardial preload and left ventricular end diastolic volume, resulting in a decrease in myocardial oxygen consumption. Nitrates also dilate coronary vessels and improve collateral flow. The dose should be titrated up until desired effects are achieved or adverse effects, notably headache or hypotension, develop. Following stabilization, an oral formulation can be started. Morphine can be added if nitrates are ineffective; there may be some situations where morphine may be used alone (e.g., nitrates are contraindicated).[2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
Supplemental oxygen should be given to patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes with arterial saturation <90%, respiratory distress, or other high-risk features of hypoxemia.[2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
nitroglycerin: 0.3 to 0.6 mg (tablets) sublingually every 5 minutes when required, maximum 3 doses in 15 minutes; or 400-800 micrograms (1-2 sprays) sublingually every 3-5 minutes when required, maximum 3 doses in 15 minutes
and/or
morphine sulfate: 2-5 mg intravenously every 5-30 minutes when required
Secondary options
nitroglycerin: 5 micrograms/minute intravenous infusion initially, increase by 5 micrograms/minute increments every 3-5 minutes according to response up to 20 micrograms/minute, if no response may increase by 10-20 micrograms/minute every 3-5 minutes, maximum 100 micrograms/minute
and/or
morphine sulfate: 2-5 mg intravenously every 5-30 minutes when required
beta-blocker
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Beta-blockers are front-line anti-anginal drugs.[2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com Beta-blockers should be initiated within the first 24 hours for patients who do not have one or more of the following: signs of heart failure, evidence of a low output state, increased risk for cardiogenic shock, or other relative contraindications to beta-blockade (e.g., heart block, active asthma).[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
Intravenous administration is recommended in the emergency department when there is ongoing chest pain.[110]Gibler WB, Cannon CP, Blomkalns AL, et al. Practical implementation of the guidelines for unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the emergency department: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Acute Cardiac Care), Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group, in collaboration with the Society of Chest Pain Centers. Circulation. 2005 May 24;111(20):2699-710. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.cir.0000165556.44271.be http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15911720?tool=bestpractice.com In other cases, oral treatment is sufficient.
Primary options
metoprolol succinate: 100-400 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
OR
metoprolol tartrate: 50-200 mg orally (immediate-release) twice daily; 2.5 to 5 mg intravenously every 10 minutes when required, maximum 15 mg/total dose
OR
bisoprolol: 5-20 mg orally once daily
OR
carvedilol: 12.5 to 50 mg orally twice daily
antiplatelet therapy
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
All patients with suspected NSTE-ACS should be given a single loading dose of aspirin as soon as possible, unless they have significant bleeding risk or hypersensitivity to aspirin.
A P2Y12 inhibitor (e.g., ticagrelor, prasugrel, clopidogrel) is recommended, in addition to aspirin, for 12 months, unless there are contraindications such as excessive risk of bleeding.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
Ticagrelor is recommended, in the absence of contraindications, for patients at moderate-to-high risk of ischemic events (e.g., elevated cardiac troponins), regardless of initial treatment strategy.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
Clopidogrel is recommended for patients who cannot receive ticagrelor or prasugrel. An increased loading dose of clopidogrel (or a supplementary dose at percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] following an initial dose) is recommended for patients scheduled for an invasive strategy when ticagrelor or prasugrel is not an option.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com
Prasugrel is recommended in patients who are proceeding to PCI if there are no contraindications.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com [115]Coughlan JJ, Aytekin A, Lahu S, et al. Ticagrelor or prasugrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: a prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Oct 1;6(10):1121-9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8246339 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190967?tool=bestpractice.com Prasugrel is contraindicated in patients with a history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, and its use is not recommended in patients ages >75 years or in patients with low body weight (<60 kg) due to increased bleeding risk (though dose reductions may mitigate this risk); therefore, ticagrelor is often more widely used.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [93]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com [116]O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al; American College of Emergency Physicians, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 29;61(4):e78-140. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.019 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23256914?tool=bestpractice.com [117]Goodwin MM, Desilets AR, Willett KC. Thienopyridines in acute coronary syndrome. Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Feb;45(2):207-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21304037?tool=bestpractice.com [118]Menichelli M, Neumann FJ, Ndrepepa G, et al. Age- and weight-adapted dose of prasugrel versus standard dose of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results from a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Sep 15;173(6):436-44. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32687741?tool=bestpractice.com
Cangrelor, an intravenous adenosine triphosphate analog that binds reversibly to the platelet P2Y12 receptor and has a short half-life (<10 minutes), may be considered in P2Y12 inhibitor-naive patients undergoing PCI.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [119]Bhatt DL, Stone GW, Mahaffey KW, et al. Effect of platelet inhibition with cangrelor during PCI on ischemic events. N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 4;368(14):1303-13. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1300815 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23473369?tool=bestpractice.com It has been shown to reduce periprocedural death, myocardial infarction, ischemia-driven revascularization, and stent thrombosis when compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing PCI.[119]Bhatt DL, Stone GW, Mahaffey KW, et al. Effect of platelet inhibition with cangrelor during PCI on ischemic events. N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 4;368(14):1303-13. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1300815 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23473369?tool=bestpractice.com [120]Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Hamm CW, et al. Effect of cangrelor on periprocedural outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions: a pooled analysis of patient-level data. Lancet. 2013 Dec 14;382(9909):1981-92. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24011551?tool=bestpractice.com It is a second-line treatment option, although it may be used first-line in patients who are unable to take oral medication (i.e., sedated, unconscious, or vomiting).
Primary options
conservative strategy
aspirin: 162-325 mg orally as a loading dose
and
ticagrelor: 180 mg orally as a loading dose
OR
PCI planned
aspirin: 162-325 mg orally as a loading dose
-- AND --
prasugrel: 60 mg orally as a loading dose
or
ticagrelor: 180 mg orally as a loading dose
Secondary options
conservative strategy
aspirin: 162-325 mg orally as a loading dose
and
clopidogrel: 300 mg orally as a loading dose
OR
PCI planned
aspirin: 162-325 mg orally as a loading dose
and
clopidogrel: 600 mg orally as a loading dose (or 300 mg prior to PCI and 300 mg at time of PCI)
OR
PCI planned
aspirin: 162-325 mg orally as a loading dose
and
cangrelor: 30 micrograms/kg intravenously initially (before PCI), followed immediately by 4 micrograms/kg/minute infusion for at least 2 hours or the duration of PCI (whichever is longer)
OR
aspirin-allergic patients
ticagrelor: conservative strategy or PCI planned: 180 mg orally as a loading dose
or
clopidogrel: conservative strategy: 300 mg orally as a loading dose; PCI planned: 600 mg orally as a loading dose (or 300 mg prior to PCI and 300 mg at time of PCI)
or
prasugrel: PCI planned: 60 mg orally as a loading dose
or
cangrelor: PCI planned: 30 micrograms/kg intravenously initially (before PCI), followed immediately by 4 micrograms/kg/minute infusion for at least 2 hours or the duration of PCI (whichever is longer)
non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome
early coronary catheterization ± revascularization
General recommendations for invasive coronary angiogram with or without revascularization in NSTE-ACS include the two strategies below.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826.
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
How do routine and selective invasive strategies compare for the treatment of unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.1452/fullShow me the answer
Strategy 1: an immediate invasive strategy (<2 hours) is recommended in patients with at least one of the following very high-risk criteria: ongoing or recurrent pain despite treatment, hemodynamic instability (low blood pressure [BP] or shock) or cardiogenic shock; acute left ventricular failure, presumed secondary to ongoing myocardial ischemia; a life-threatening arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation); mechanical complications such as new-onset mitral regurgitation.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com
Strategy 2: an early invasive strategy (<24 hours) is recommended in patients with at least one of the following high-risk criteria: confirmed diagnosis of non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) based on current recommended high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) algorithms; dynamic ST- or T-wave changes (symptomatic or silent); transient ST-segment elevation; Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score >140.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients who have no recurrence of symptoms and have none of the high- or very high-risk features are considered to be at low risk for acute ischemic events and can be managed by a selective invasive strategy.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with UA have a significantly lower risk of death compared with those with NSTEMI and get less benefit from an immediate invasive approach.[94]Puelacher C, Gugala M, Adamson PD, et al. Incidence and outcomes of unstable angina compared with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Heart. 2019 Sep;105(18):1423-31. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31018955?tool=bestpractice.com An inpatient invasive strategy (coronary angiography within 72 hours of admission, with follow-on PCI if indicated) is generally recommended for patients with a high index of suspicion for UA, particularly for those who have an intermediate or higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients who are on optimal medical therapy and are still having symptoms should be considered for cardiac catheterization.
Following a selective invasive strategy, a coronary angiogram is usually carried out for recurring symptoms, objective evidence of ischemia on noninvasive testing, or detection of obstructive coronary artery disease on coronary computed tomography angiography.
The benefit of early revascularization in NSTE-ACS depends on the finding of a culprit lesion or coronary obstruction responsible for the clinical presentation. In more than one third of NSTE-ACS patients undergoing coronary angiography as part of an invasive strategy, no culprit lesion or target for revascularization is found.[122]Kerensky RA, Wade M, Deedwania P, et al. Revisiting the culprit lesion in non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. Results from the VANQWISH trial angiographic core laboratory. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 May 1;39(9):1456-63. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11985907?tool=bestpractice.com
antiplatelet therapy
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Aspirin is recommended for all UA/NSTEMI patients without contraindications.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com
A P2Y12 inhibitor (e.g., ticagrelor, prasugrel, clopidogrel) is recommended, in addition to aspirin, for 12 months, unless there are contraindications such as excessive risk of bleeding.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
Ticagrelor is recommended, in the absence of contraindications, for patients at moderate-to-high risk of ischemic events (e.g., elevated cardiac troponins), regardless of initial treatment strategy.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
Clopidogrel is recommended for patients who cannot receive ticagrelor or prasugrel. An increased loading dose of clopidogrel (or a supplementary dose at PCI following an initial dose) is recommended for patients scheduled for an invasive strategy when ticagrelor or prasugrel is not an option.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com
Prasugrel is recommended in patients who are proceeding to PCI if there are no contraindications.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com [115]Coughlan JJ, Aytekin A, Lahu S, et al. Ticagrelor or prasugrel for patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with percutaneous coronary intervention: a prespecified subgroup analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Oct 1;6(10):1121-9. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8246339 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34190967?tool=bestpractice.com Prasugrel is contraindicated in patients with a history of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack, and its use is not recommended in patients ages >75 years or in patients with low body weight (<60 kg) due to increased bleeding risk (though dose reductions may mitigate this risk); therefore, ticagrelor is often more widely used.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [93]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com [116]O'Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al; American College of Emergency Physicians, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Jan 29;61(4):e78-140. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.019 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23256914?tool=bestpractice.com [117]Goodwin MM, Desilets AR, Willett KC. Thienopyridines in acute coronary syndrome. Ann Pharmacother. 2011 Feb;45(2):207-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21304037?tool=bestpractice.com [118]Menichelli M, Neumann FJ, Ndrepepa G, et al. Age- and weight-adapted dose of prasugrel versus standard dose of ticagrelor in patients with acute coronary syndromes: results from a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med. 2020 Sep 15;173(6):436-44. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32687741?tool=bestpractice.com
Cangrelor, an intravenous adenosine triphosphate analog that binds reversibly to the platelet P2Y12 receptor and has a short half-life (<10 minutes), may be considered in P2Y12 inhibitor-naive patients undergoing PCI.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [119]Bhatt DL, Stone GW, Mahaffey KW, et al. Effect of platelet inhibition with cangrelor during PCI on ischemic events. N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 4;368(14):1303-13. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1300815 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23473369?tool=bestpractice.com It has been shown to reduce periprocedural death, MI, ischemia-driven revascularization, and stent thrombosis when compared with clopidogrel in patients undergoing PCI.[119]Bhatt DL, Stone GW, Mahaffey KW, et al. Effect of platelet inhibition with cangrelor during PCI on ischemic events. N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 4;368(14):1303-13. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1300815 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23473369?tool=bestpractice.com [120]Steg PG, Bhatt DL, Hamm CW, et al. Effect of cangrelor on periprocedural outcomes in percutaneous coronary interventions: a pooled analysis of patient-level data. Lancet. 2013 Dec 14;382(9909):1981-92. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24011551?tool=bestpractice.com It is a second-line treatment option, although it may be used first-line in patients who are unable to take oral medication (i.e., sedated, unconscious, or vomiting).
P2Y12 inhibitors have a fast onset of action, allowing a loading dose administration following coronary angiography and directly before PCI. However, pretreatment with a P2Y12 inhibitor may be considered in selected cases and according to the bleeding risk, when the patient cannot undergo an early invasive strategy.
Primary options
conservative strategy
aspirin: 162-325 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 81-162 mg once daily
and
ticagrelor: 180 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 90 mg twice daily
OR
PCI planned
aspirin: 162-325 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 81-162 mg once daily
-- AND --
prasugrel: 60 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 10 mg once daily
or
ticagrelor: 180 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 90 mg twice daily
Secondary options
conservative strategy
aspirin: 162-325 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 81-162 mg once daily
and
clopidogrel: 300 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 75 mg once daily
OR
PCI planned
aspirin: 162-325 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 81-162 mg once daily
and
clopidogrel: 600 mg orally as a loading dose (or 300 mg prior to PCI and 300 mg at time of PCI), followed by 75 mg once daily
OR
PCI planned
aspirin: 162-325 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 81-162 mg once daily
and
cangrelor: 30 micrograms/kg intravenously initially (before PCI), followed immediately by 4 micrograms/kg/minute infusion for at least 2 hours or the duration of PCI (whichever is longer)
OR
aspirin-allergic patients
ticagrelor: conservative strategy or PCI planned: 180 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 90 mg twice daily
or
clopidogrel: conservative strategy: 300 mg orally as loading dose, followed by 75 mg once daily; PCI planned: 600 mg orally as a loading dose (or 300 mg prior to PCI and 300 mg at time of PCI), followed by 75 mg once daily
or
prasugrel: PCI planned: 60 mg orally as a loading dose, followed by 10 mg once daily
or
cangrelor: PCI planned: 30 micrograms/kg intravenously initially (before PCI), followed immediately by 4 micrograms/kg/minute infusion for at least 2 hours or the duration of PCI (whichever is longer)
anticoagulation
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Anticoagulation is recommended for all patients, in addition to antiplatelet therapy, irrespective of the initial treatment strategy.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
Options for anticoagulation include unfractionated heparin, a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH; e.g., enoxaparin), or a direct thrombin inhibitor (e.g., bivalirudin).[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
Bivalirudin is a reasonable alternative to unfractionated heparin for patients undergoing PCI.[93]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com
In aspirin-treated patients, short-term unfractionated heparin or LMWH (for up to 7 days) reduced the risk of MI, but there was a trend toward more major bleeds in the heparin studies compared with control studies.[123]Eikelboom JW, Anand SS, Malmberg K, et al. Unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin in acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2000 Jun 3;355(9219):1936-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10859038?tool=bestpractice.com [124]Andrade-Castellanos CA, Colunga-Lozano LE, Delgado-Figueroa N, et al. Heparin versus placebo for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 27;(6):CD003462. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003462.pub3/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24972265?tool=bestpractice.com Some studies have shown a benefit from short-term treatment in terms of mortality, although others have not.[123]Eikelboom JW, Anand SS, Malmberg K, et al. Unfractionated heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin in acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2000 Jun 3;355(9219):1936-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10859038?tool=bestpractice.com [124]Andrade-Castellanos CA, Colunga-Lozano LE, Delgado-Figueroa N, et al. Heparin versus placebo for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 27;(6):CD003462. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003462.pub3/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24972265?tool=bestpractice.com
For patients undergoing PCI, fondaparinux (a selective factor Xa inhibitor) alone is no longer recommended due to a higher incidence of guiding-catheter thrombosis.[93]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com [125]Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, et al. Comparison of fondaparinux and enoxaparin in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 2006 Apr 6;354(14):1464-76. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa055443 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16537663?tool=bestpractice.com [126]Yusuf S, Mehta SR, Chrolavicius S, et al. Effects of fondaparinux on mortality and reinfarction in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the OASIS-6 randomized trial. JAMA. 2006 Apr 5;295(13):1519-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16537725?tool=bestpractice.com
The intensity of antithrombotic treatment should be tailored to individual situations and risk of complications.[127]Navarese EP, Andreotti F, Kołodziejczak M, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of anticoagulant strategies for acute coronary syndromes. Comprehensive network meta-analysis of 42 randomised trials involving 117,353 patients. Thromb Haemost. 2015 Nov;114(5):933-44. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177601?tool=bestpractice.com Triple therapy (antiplatelet agents, heparin, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors) is typically used in high-risk patients.[2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
heparin: 60 units/kg (maximum 5000 units) intravenous bolus initially, followed by 12 units/kg/hour (maximum 1000 units/hour) intravenous infusion, adjust dose to target aPTT, continue for at least 48 hours or until hospital discharge or PCI is performed
OR
enoxaparin: 1 mg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours, continue for at least 48 hours or until hospital discharge or PCI is performed
OR
bivalirudin: consult specialist for guidance on dose
Secondary options
fondaparinux: 2.5 mg subcutaneously once daily, continue until hospital discharge
beta-blocker and/or calcium-channel blocker and/or nitrate
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Beta-blockers are front-line anti-anginal drugs.[2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com Beta-blockers should be initiated within the first 24 hours for patients who do not have one or more of the following: signs of heart failure, evidence of a low output state, increased risk for cardiogenic shock, or other relative contraindications to beta-blockade (e.g., heart block, active asthma).[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
Intravenous administration is recommended in the emergency department when there is ongoing chest pain.[110]Gibler WB, Cannon CP, Blomkalns AL, et al. Practical implementation of the guidelines for unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the emergency department: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Acute Cardiac Care), Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group, in collaboration with the Society of Chest Pain Centers. Circulation. 2005 May 24;111(20):2699-710. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.cir.0000165556.44271.be http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15911720?tool=bestpractice.com In other cases, oral treatment is sufficient.
Nondihydropyridine calcium-channel blockers (i.e., diltiazem, verapamil) are recommended for symptom relief in patients with continuing chest pain or frequently recurring angina when beta-blockers are contraindicated and there is no left ventricular dysfunction.[2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com [110]Gibler WB, Cannon CP, Blomkalns AL, et al. Practical implementation of the guidelines for unstable angina/non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the emergency department: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Acute Cardiac Care), Council on Cardiovascular Nursing, and Quality of Care and Outcomes Research Interdisciplinary Working Group, in collaboration with the Society of Chest Pain Centers. Circulation. 2005 May 24;111(20):2699-710. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.cir.0000165556.44271.be http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15911720?tool=bestpractice.com There are only small randomized trials of calcium-channel blockers in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Generally they show efficacy in relieving symptoms, which seems to be equivalent to the efficacy of beta-blockers. However, calcium-channel blockers do not reduce mortality in unselected patients. Even so, both diltiazem and verapamil reduce combined end-points (long-term mortality and recurrent nonfatal myocardial infarction [MI]) in patients with non-Q-wave MI without pulmonary congestion.[128]Gibson RS, Hansen JF, Messerli F, et al. Long-term effects of diltiazem and verapamil on mortality and cardiac events in non-Q-wave acute myocardial infarction without pulmonary congestion: post hoc subset analysis of the multicenter diltiazem postinfarction trial and the second Danish verapamil infarction trial studies. Am J Cardiol. 2000 Aug 1;86(3):275-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10922432?tool=bestpractice.com In patients without congestive heart failure who are undergoing thrombolysis for acute MI, the use of oral diltiazem did not reduce the cumulative occurrence of cardiac death, refractory ischemia, or nonfatal MI during 6 months' follow-up, but it did reduce the composite end-point of nonfatal cardiac events, especially the need for myocardial revascularization.[129]Boden WE, van Gilst WH, Scheldewaert RG, et al. Diltiazem in acute myocardial infarction treated with thrombolytic agents: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Incomplete Infarction Trial of European Research Collaborators Evaluating Prognosis post-Thrombolysis (INTERCEPT). Lancet. 2000 May 20;355(9217):1751-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10832825?tool=bestpractice.com Use of high-dose short-acting nifedipine (a dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker) may have a detrimental effect on mortality in patients with coronary artery disease.[130]Furberg CD, Psaty BM, Meyer JV. Nifedipine: dose-related increase in mortality in patients with coronary heart disease. Circulation. 1995 Sep 1;92(5):1326-31. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/01.cir.92.5.1326 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7648682?tool=bestpractice.com
Oral nitrates (preferably long-acting nitrates, such as isosorbide mononitrate) can be used for angina symptoms when calcium-channel blockers are contraindicated, poorly tolerated, or not achieving adequate symptomatic relief.[106]Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-77. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/41/3/407/5556137 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31504439?tool=bestpractice.com However, expert advice is that they are frequently used in clinical practice to provide continued symptomatic relief and prevention of angina.
Combination therapy is usually required in most patients (e.g., a beta-blocker plus a long-acting nitrate, or a calcium-channel blocker plus a long-acting nitrate). The combination of a beta-blocker and a dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker is usually avoided in practice as using these agents together increases the risk of hypotension, bradycardia, AV block, and PR interval prolongation, and monitoring is required (e.g., BP, heart rate, ECG). Rarely, a combination of all three drug classes may be required with appropriate caution and monitoring.
Primary options
metoprolol succinate: 100-400 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
OR
metoprolol tartrate: 50-200 mg orally (immediate-release) twice daily; 2.5 to 5 mg intravenously every 10 minutes when required, maximum 15 mg/total dose
OR
bisoprolol: 5-20 mg orally once daily
OR
carvedilol: 12.5 to 50 mg orally twice daily
Secondary options
diltiazem: 180-360 mg/day orally (immediate-release) given in 3-4 divided doses; 120-480 mg (extended-release) once daily
OR
verapamil: 80-120 mg orally (immediate-release) three times daily, maximum 480 mg/day
Tertiary options
isosorbide mononitrate: 20 mg orally (immediate-release) twice daily; 30-120 mg orally (extended-release) once daily in the morning
More isosorbide mononitrateLower starting doses of the immediate-release formulation may be required in patients with small stature. Higher maximum doses of the extended-release formulation may rarely be required (240 mg/day).
glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Numerous trials of NSTE-ACS have shown benefit of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in reducing mortality and cardiovascular events, both in patients treated medically and in those who underwent PCI.[2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228.
https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
However, most, if not all, of the trials were conducted before P2Y12 inhibitors became routine therapy. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors reduce composite ischemic end-points, but increase the risk of bleeding.[2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228.
https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
What are the effects of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers during percutaneous coronary intervention?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.470/fullShow me the answer With no significant benefit of upstream use of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor in an invasive strategy, it is reasonable to withhold it until after invasive coronary angiography.
A glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (eptifibatide or tirofiban) can be administered to patients with NSTEMI and high-risk features (e.g., elevated troponin levels) who are not adequately pretreated with clopidogrel or ticagrelor, at the time of PCI.[2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com In patients undergoing PCI and receiving clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use is recommended if there is a large thrombus burden, evidence of a no-reflow, or slow flow.[93]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com [121]Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019 Jan 7;40(2):87-165. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/40/2/87/5079120 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30165437?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
eptifibatide: 180 micrograms/kg (maximum 22.6 mg) intravenous bolus initially, followed by 2 micrograms/kg/minute (maximum 15 mg/hour) intravenous infusion, a second bolus dose of 180 micrograms/kg (maximum 22.6 mg) should be administered 10 minutes after the first bolus, continue infusion for up to 18-24 hours after PCI
OR
tirofiban: 25 micrograms/kg intravenous bolus initially, followed by 0.15 micrograms/kg/minute intravenous infusion for up to 18 hours
ACE inhibitor
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Indicated if hypertension persists despite treatment with nitrates or beta-blockers or calcium-channel blockers, or in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction or congestive heart failure.[2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
ACE inhibitors are beneficial in high-risk patients (known history of coronary artery disease, stroke, peripheral vascular disease, or diabetes plus at least one other cardiovascular risk factor) including those with normal left ventricular function, and should be initiated 12-24 hours after presentation, in the absence of hypotension, hyperkalemia, and acute renal failure.[131]Yusuf S, Sleight P, Pogue J, et al; Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Study Investigators. Effects of an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor, ramipril, on cardiovascular events in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med. 2000 Jan 20;342(3):145-53. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM200001203420301 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10639539?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
perindopril erbumine: 4-16 mg orally once daily
OR
ramipril: 2.5 to 20 mg orally once daily
OR
enalapril: 10-20 mg orally once daily
OR
captopril: 25-50 mg orally three times daily
OR
lisinopril: 5-40 mg orally once daily
poststabilization: confirmed UA (nonelevated cardiac biomarkers)
antithrombotic therapy
Following stabilization in confirmed UA, patients should be started on long-term anti-anginal treatment.
Aspirin should be continued indefinitely. For patients with aspirin allergy, long-term ticagrelor or clopidogrel use is suggested, and in these patients, clopidogrel should also be continued indefinitely. Prasugrel may be used in these patients treated with a stent.
Duration of long-term antiplatelet therapy: for UA/non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (non-STEMI) patients treated medically without stenting, aspirin should be given indefinitely and clopidogrel or ticagrelor should be prescribed for up to 12 months.[2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
For UA/non-STEMI patients treated with either bare metal stent (BMS) or drug-eluting stent (DES) aspirin should be continued indefinitely. Clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor should be given for at least 12 months in patients with DES and up to 12 months in patients receiving BMS.[2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
In selected patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, shorter-duration dual antiplatelet therapy (1–3 months) is reasonable, with subsequent transition to P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy to reduce the risk of bleeding events.[93]Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 Jan 18;145(3):e18-114. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34882435?tool=bestpractice.com
In patients who are event-free after 3-6 months of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and who are not high ischemic risk, single antiplatelet therapy (preferably with a P2Y12 receptor inhibitor) can be considered.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com In patients with a high bleeding risk, monotherapy with aspirin or P2Y12 receptor inhibitor may be considered after 1 month of DAPT.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com De-escalation of P2Y12 receptor inhibitor treatment (e.g., with a switch from prasugrel/ticagrelor to clopidogrel) may also be considered as an alternative DAPT strategy to reduce bleeding risk.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com De-escalation of antiplatelet therapy is not recommended in the first 30 days after an ACS event.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com
For patients with coronary artery disease, use of low-dose rivaroxaban (a direct oral anticoagulant) may be considered in combination with low-dose aspirin for 12 months.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [132]Brito V, Ciapponi A, Kwong J. Factor Xa inhibitors for acute coronary syndromes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jan 19;(1):CD007038. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21249686?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
Without stenting
aspirin: 81-325 mg orally once daily
More aspirinA dose of 81 mg is recommended if used with ticagrelor.
-- AND --
clopidogrel: 75 mg orally once daily
or
ticagrelor: 90 mg orally twice daily
OR
With stenting
aspirin: 81-325 mg orally once daily
More aspirinA dose of 81 mg is recommended if used with ticagrelor.
-- AND --
clopidogrel: 75 mg orally once daily
or
prasugrel: 10 mg orally once daily
or
ticagrelor: 90 mg orally twice daily
OR
Aspirin-allergic patients without stenting
clopidogrel: 75 mg orally once daily
or
ticagrelor: 90 mg orally twice daily
OR
Aspirin-allergic patients with stenting
clopidogrel: 75 mg orally once daily
or
prasugrel: 10 mg orally once daily
or
ticagrelor: 90 mg orally once daily
Secondary options
aspirin: 75-100 mg orally once daily
and
rivaroxaban: 2.5 mg orally twice daily
statin
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
In the absence of contraindications, high-intensity statin therapy (i.e., statin regimens that reduce low-density lipoprotein [LDL]-cholesterol by ≥50%) should be started as soon as possible after admission in all NSTE-ACS patients.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com For secondary prevention, treatment of patients who have atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) depends on their risk of future ASCVD events.[133]Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):e1082-143. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30586774?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients are considered to be at very high risk of future events if they have a history of multiple major ASCVD events (recent acute coronary syndrome [within the past 12 months], myocardial infarction other than the recent acute coronary syndrome, ischemic stroke, symptomatic peripheral arterial disease [claudication with ankle brachial index <0.85, previous revascularization or amputation]) or one major ASCVD event and multiple high risk conditions (age ≥65 years, heterozygous family history, history of previous coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous intervention, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, current smoking, persistently elevated LDL-cholesterol [≥100 mg/dL {≥2.6 mmol/L}] despite maximally tolerated therapy, history of congestive heart failure). Patients at very high risk of future events should receive high-intensity statin therapy or maximal statin therapy.[133]Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):e1082-143. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30586774?tool=bestpractice.com
In patients not at very high risk of future events, high-intensity statin therapy should be initiated and continued in those up to 75 years of age with the aim of achieving a 50% or greater reduction in LDL-cholesterol levels. Moderate-intensity statin therapy may be used (reducing LDL-cholesterol by 30% to <50%) if high-intensity statin therapy is not tolerated. In patients older than 75 years, moderate- or high-intensity statin therapy should be considered.[133]Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):e1082-143. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30586774?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
High-intensity statin
atorvastatin: 40-80 mg orally once daily
OR
High-intensity statin
rosuvastatin: 20-40 mg orally once daily
Secondary options
Moderate-intensity statin
atorvastatin: 10-20 mg orally once daily
OR
Moderate-intensity statin
rosuvastatin: 5-10 mg orally once daily
OR
Moderate-intensity statin
simvastatin: 20-40 mg orally once daily; increased risk of myopathy with 80 mg/day dose
OR
Moderate-intensity statin
pravastatin: 40-80 mg orally once daily
OR
Moderate-intensity statin
lovastatin: 40-80 mg orally (immediate-release) once daily
OR
Moderate-intensity statin
fluvastatin: 40 mg orally (immediate-release) twice daily; 80 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
OR
Moderate-intensity statin
pitavastatin: 1-4 mg orally once daily
ezetimibe
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
For patients at very high risk of future events, and those up to 75 years of age and not at very high risk, ezetimibe may be added if the patient is on maximal statin therapy and LDL-cholesterol level remains ≥55 mg/dL (≥1.4 mmol/L).[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [133]Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):e1082-143. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30586774?tool=bestpractice.com [134]Szarek M, Bittner VA, Aylward P, et al. Lipoprotein(a) lowering by alirocumab reduces the total burden of cardiovascular events independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering: ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial. Eur Heart J. 2020 Nov 21;41(44):4245-55. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/41/44/4245/5922803 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051646?tool=bestpractice.com [135]Oyama K, Giugliano RP, Tang M, et al. Effect of evolocumab on acute arterial events across all vascular territories: results from the FOURIER trial. Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 14;42(47):4821-9. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/47/4821/6372436 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34537830?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
ezetimibe: 10 mg orally once daily
proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
In patients at very high risk of future events, a PCSK9 inhibitor monoclonal antibody may be added to maximal statin and ezetimibe therapy if LDL-cholesterol level remains ≥55 mg/dL (≥1.4 mmol/L).[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com [133]Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC/AACVPR/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/ADA/AGS/APhA/ASPC/NLA/PCNA guideline on the management of blood cholesterol: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2019 Jun 18;139(25):e1082-143. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000625 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30586774?tool=bestpractice.com [134]Szarek M, Bittner VA, Aylward P, et al. Lipoprotein(a) lowering by alirocumab reduces the total burden of cardiovascular events independent of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol lowering: ODYSSEY OUTCOMES trial. Eur Heart J. 2020 Nov 21;41(44):4245-55. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/41/44/4245/5922803 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051646?tool=bestpractice.com [135]Oyama K, Giugliano RP, Tang M, et al. Effect of evolocumab on acute arterial events across all vascular territories: results from the FOURIER trial. Eur Heart J. 2021 Dec 14;42(47):4821-9. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/47/4821/6372436 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34537830?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
alirocumab: 75-150 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks; or 300 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks
OR
evolocumab: 140 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks; or 420 mg subcutaneously once monthly
beta-blocker
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Unless contraindicated, beta-blockers should be continued indefinitely in patients with reduced left ventricular function, with or without symptoms of heart failure.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com
In other patients, beta-blockers may be useful, but evidence of their long-term benefit is less well established.
Primary options
metoprolol succinate: 100-400 mg orally (extended-release) once daily
OR
metoprolol tartrate: 50-200 mg orally (immediate-release) twice daily
OR
bisoprolol: 5-20 mg orally once daily
OR
carvedilol: 12.5 to 50 mg orally twice daily
ACE inhibitor
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Unless contraindicated, long-term use of ACE inhibitors is indicated in patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or less and also in patients with diabetes mellitus, hypertension, or chronic kidney disease.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com
ACE inhibitors should be considered for all other patients to prevent recurrence of ischemic events.[2]Amsterdam EA, Wenger NK, Brindis RG, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-228. https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25260718?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
perindopril erbumine: 4-16 mg orally once daily
OR
ramipril: 2.5 to 20 mg orally once daily
OR
enalapril: 10-20 mg orally once daily
OR
captopril: 25-50 mg orally three times daily
OR
lisinopril: 5-40 mg orally once daily
anti-ischemic therapy
Treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Long-term anti-ischemic therapy in patients with stable ischemic heart disease should be individualized based on patient characteristics and clinical factors, (e.g, heart rate, blood pressure, left ventricular function) and preferences.
Anti-ischemic treatment options include beta-blockers, nitrates, calcium-channel blockers, ivabradine, and ranolazine.[106]Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-77. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/41/3/407/5556137 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31504439?tool=bestpractice.com
cardiac rehabilitation
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
In addition to adequate control of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and hyperlipidemia, risk-factor intervention is recommended.[1]Byrne RA, Rossello X, Coughlan JJ, et al. 2023 ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2023 Oct 12;44(38):3720-826. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/44/38/3720/7243210 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37622654?tool=bestpractice.com This includes lifestyle modifications (smoking cessation; regular physical activity, with 30 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic activity at least 5 times/week; a healthy diet based on low salt intake, a decreased intake of saturated fats, and a regular intake of fruit and vegetables; and weight reduction).[26]Wu AD, Lindson N, Hartmann-Boyce J, et al. Smoking cessation for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 8;8(8):CD014936. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD014936.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35938889?tool=bestpractice.com [106]Knuuti J, Wijns W, Saraste A, et al. 2019 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2020 Jan 14;41(3):407-77. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/41/3/407/5556137 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31504439?tool=bestpractice.com [136]Brown TM, Pack QR, Aberegg E, et al. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation programs: 2024 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation. 2024 Oct 29;150(18):e328-47. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001289 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39315436?tool=bestpractice.com
Choose a patient group to see our recommendations
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups. See disclaimer
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer