Tislelizumab
Tislelizumab is an anti-programmed cell death-1-receptor (PD-1) monoclonal antibody. It has been shown to improve overall survival compared with chemotherapy (investigator's choice of the following single-agent chemotherapies: paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan) and is a promising second-line agent.[15]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1
[217]Shen L, Kato K, Kim SB, et al. Tislelizumab versus chemotherapy as second-line treatment for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (RATIONALE-302): a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 10;40(26):3065-76.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.21.01926
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35442766?tool=bestpractice.com
[218]ClinicalTrials.gov. A study of tislelizumab (BGB-A317) versus chemotherapy as second line treatment in participants with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. NCT03430843. Dec 2023 [internet publication].
https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03430843
Tislelizumab monotherapy has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for adults with unresectable or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who have received prior systemic chemotherapy that did not include a programed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor. It is approved in Europe as monotherapy for adults with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after prior platinum-based chemotherapy. According to one randomized phase 3 trial, first-line treatment with tislelizumab plus chemotherapy has better overall survival with a manageable safety profile than placebo plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.[219]Xu J, Kato K, Raymond E, et al. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (RATIONALE-306): a global, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2023 May;24(5):483-95.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37080222?tool=bestpractice.com
[220]ClinicalTrials.gov. A study of tislelizumab (BGB-A317) in combination with chemotherapy as first line treatment in participants with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. NCT03783442. Nov 2023 [internet publication].
https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03783442
Bemarituzumab
Bemarituzumab is a monoclonal antibody against fibroblast growth factor receptor 2b (FGFR2b). The FDA has granted bemarituzumab breakthrough therapy designation for the first-line treatment of patients with FGFR2b-overexpressing and HER2-negative metastatic and locally advanced gastric and esophagogastric adenocarcinoma in combination with modified FOLFOX6 (fluoropyrimidine, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin). In the phase 3 FIGHT trial, bemarituzumab plus FOLFOX6 demonstrated clinically significant and substantial improvements in the primary endpoint of progression-free survival compared with FOLFOX6 alone in patients with FGFR2b+, non-HER2-positive frontline advanced gastric or esophagogastric cancer.[221]Wainberg ZA, Enzinger PC, Kang YK, et al. Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled phase 2 study of bemarituzumab combined with modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) in first-line (1L) treatment of advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FIGHT). Paper presented at: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2021 gastrointestinal cancers symposium. Esophageal and gastric cancer: abstract 160. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan 20;39(3_suppl):160.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/abs/10.1200/JCO.2021.39.3_suppl.160
[222]Catenacci DV, Tesfaye A, Tejani M, et al. Bemarituzumab with modified FOLFOX6 for advanced FGFR2-positive gastroesophageal cancer: FIGHT Phase III study design. Future Oncol. 2019 Jun;15(18):2073-82.
https://www.futuremedicine.com/doi/10.2217/fon-2019-0141
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31094225?tool=bestpractice.com
Toripalimab
Toripalimab is an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody. In one phase 3 trial of patients with treatment-naive advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, toripalimab plus paclitaxel and cisplatin was associated with a significantly longer progression-free and overall survival compared with treatment with chemotherapy alone.[223]Wang ZX, Cui C, Yao J, et al. Toripalimab plus chemotherapy in treatment-naïve, advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (JUPITER-06): a multi-center phase 3 trial. Cancer Cell. 2022 Mar 14;40(3):277-88.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35245446?tool=bestpractice.com
It is approved in Europe for the treatment of unresectable advanced, recurrent, or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, in combination with paclitaxel and cisplatin. It is not approved in the US for this indication as yet.
Camrelizumab
Camrelizumab is an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody. Treatment with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy (paclitaxel and cisplatin) was associated with longer overall and progression-free survival, compared with treatment with placebo plus chemotherapy, in one phase 3 trial of treatment-naive patients with unresectable, locally advanced or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.[224]Luo H, Lu J, Bai Y, et al. Effect of camrelizumab vs placebo added to chemotherapy on survival and progression-free survival in patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: the ESCORT-1st randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021 Sep 14;326(10):916-25.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2784143
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519801?tool=bestpractice.com
Tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1)
Tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) is an oral prodrug of fluorouracil with a prolonged half-life. Perioperative chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin has been associated with improved 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma, compared with perioperative chemotherapy with capecitabine and oxaliplatin.[225]Zhang X, Liang H, Li Z, et al. Perioperative or postoperative adjuvant oxaliplatin with S-1 versus adjuvant oxaliplatin with capecitabine in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma undergoing D2 gastrectomy (RESOLVE): an open-label, superiority and non-inferiority, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Aug;22(8):1081-92.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34252374?tool=bestpractice.com
Older people may tolerate S-1 better than other chemotherapeutic agents. One phase 3 trial found that chemoradiation therapy with S-1 was associated with improved 2-year overall survival, compared with radiation therapy alone, in older patients with locally advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer (median age 77 years).[226]Ji Y, Du X, Zhu W, et al. Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with S-1 vs radiotherapy alone for older patients with esophageal cancer: a multicenter randomized phase 3 clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Oct 1;7(10):1459-66.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2782741
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34351356?tool=bestpractice.com
Robotic esophagectomy
Results from a single-center randomized trial of patients with resectable intrathoracic esophageal cancer suggest that robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy (RAMIE) reduces overall surgery-related and cardiopulmonary complications compared with open transthoracic esophagectomy (OTE).[227]van der Sluis PC, van der Horst S, May AM, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open transthoracic esophagectomy for resectable esophageal cancer: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 2019 Apr;269(4):621-30.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30308612?tool=bestpractice.com
The 5-year disease-free survival rate did not differ with surgical approach (42% in the RAMIE group and 43% in the OTE group); no statistically significant difference in recurrence rate nor recurrence pattern was observed.[228]de Groot EM, van der Horst S, Kingma BF, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy versus open esophagectomy: long-term follow-up of a randomized clinical trial. Dis Esophagus. 2020 Nov 26;33(supplement_2):doaa079.
https://academic.oup.com/dote/article/33/Supplement_2/doaa079/6006403
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33241302?tool=bestpractice.com
Further research is warranted.
Iodine-125 (125-I) brachytherapy
Small observational studies suggest that 125-I seed implantation may be of some benefit in patients with lymph node metastases or recurrence.[229]Mai Q, Mo Z, He J, et al. Feasibility and clinical value of computed tomography-guided 125I brachytherapy for pain palliation in patients with retroperitoneal lymph node metastases. J Cancer Res Ther. 2020;16(2):372-8.
https://journals.lww.com/cancerjournal/Fulltext/2020/16020/Feasibility_and_clinical_value_of_computed.26.aspx
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32474526?tool=bestpractice.com
[230]Zhang Y, Liu Z, Liang Y, et al. The effectiveness and prognostic factors of radioactive iodine-125 seed implantation for the treatment of cervical lymph node recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after external beam radiation therapy. J Contemp Brachytherapy. 2020 Dec;12(6):579-85.
https://www.termedia.pl/The-effectiveness-and-prognostic-factors-of-radioactive-iodine-125-seed-implantation-for-the-treatment-of-cervical-lymph-node-recurrence-of-esophageal-squamous-cell-carcinoma-after-external-beam-radia,54,42680,1,1.html
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33437306?tool=bestpractice.com
Further research is required.
Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)
An advanced form of 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) that changes the intensity of radiation in different parts of a single beam whilst the treatment is being delivered. This enables simultaneous treatment of multiple areas within the target area with different dose levels, potentially reducing cardiopulmonary toxicity. Retrospective studies comparing 3D-CRT with IMRT for patients with esophageal cancer have shown superior dose conformity and homogeneity as well as a reduction of radiation therapy dose delivered to the lungs and heart with IMRT.[231]Fu WH, Wang LH, Zhou ZM, et al. Comparison of conformal and intensity-modulated techniques for simultaneous integrated boost radiotherapy of upper esophageal carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2004 Apr 15;10(8):1098-102.
https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v10/i8/1098.htm
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15069706?tool=bestpractice.com
[232]Chandra A, Guerrero TM, Liu HH, et al. Feasibility of using intensity-modulated radiotherapy to improve lung sparing in treatment planning for distal esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2005 Dec;77(3):247-53.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16298001?tool=bestpractice.com
One phase 2 trial of postoperative IMRT with concurrent chemotherapy for node-positive esophageal squamous cell cancer showed this regimen to be safe and effective with 1-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates of 91.2% and 80.4%, respectively. There were no unexpected cases of serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths.[233]Tao H, Zhou Y, Yao C, et al. Phase II trial of intensity-modulated radiotherapy concurrent with chemotherapy for postoperative node-positive esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Res. 2017 Sep 21;25(8):1357-62.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7840984
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28315293?tool=bestpractice.com
Two phase 3 trials have safely employed IMRT with concurrent chemotherapy as definitive treatment for esophageal cancer.[234]Hulshof MCCM, Geijsen ED, Rozema T, et al. Randomized study on dose escalation in definitive chemoradiation for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer (ARTDECO Study). J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 1;39(25):2816-24.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.20.03697
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34101496?tool=bestpractice.com
[235]Crehange G, M'vondo C, Bertaut A, et al. Exclusive chemoradiotherapy with or without radiation dose escalation in esophageal cancer: multicenter phase 2/3 randomized trial CONCORDE (PRODIGE-26). CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials). 2021 Oct 30;(10):CN-02321697.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/central/doi/10.1002/central/CN-02321697/full
A possible disadvantage of IMRT is the prolonged time for each treatment compared with other treatment techniques.
Proton beam therapy (PBT)
A highly targeted radiation therapy technique that may limit cardiopulmonary toxicity and is associated with lower rates of postoperative complications, including pulmonary, cardiac, gastrointestinal, and wound complications, as well as reduced length of hospital stays.[236]Chuong MD, Hallemeier CL, Jabbour SK, et al. Improving outcomes for esophageal cancer using proton beam therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 1;95(1):488-97.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27084662?tool=bestpractice.com
[237]Wang J, Wei C, Tucker SL, et al. Predictors of postoperative complications after trimodality therapy for esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Aug 1;86(5):885-91.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3786201
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23845841?tool=bestpractice.com
One phase 2B trial that randomized 145 patients to receive IMRT or PBT reported that PBT reduced the risk and severity of adverse events while maintaining similar rates of 3-year progression-free survival (50.8% for IMRT and 51.2% for PBT) and 3-year overall survival (44.5% for both).[238]Lin SH, Hobbs BP, Verma V, et al. Randomized phase IIB trial of proton beam therapy versus intensity-modulated radiation therapy for locally advanced esophageal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 10;38(14):1569-79.
https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.19.02503
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32160096?tool=bestpractice.com
An ongoing phase 3 study comparing PBT to photon therapy for patients with esophageal cancer is recruiting patients.[239]ClinicalTrials.gov. Comparing proton therapy to photon radiation therapy for esophageal cancer. NCT03801876. Mar 2023 [internet publication].
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03801876
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines currently recommend that patients with esophageal cancer be treated with PBT within a clinical trial.[15]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1
Intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT)
Another emerging radiation therapy technique that uses magnets to steer the proton beam, potentially reducing toxicity to nontarget tissues. Studies have shown significant reductions in mean radiation therapy dose to the heart, lungs, kidneys, liver, and small bowel.[236]Chuong MD, Hallemeier CL, Jabbour SK, et al. Improving outcomes for esophageal cancer using proton beam therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 May 1;95(1):488-97.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27084662?tool=bestpractice.com
[240]Yu J, Zhang X, Liao L, et al. Motion-robust intensity-modulated proton therapy for distal esophageal cancer. Med Phys. 2016 Mar;43(3):1111-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26936698?tool=bestpractice.com
Clinical outcomes of IMPT for esophageal cancer are needed, as current evidence is limited to dose comparisons.[15]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1