Treatment algorithm

Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups: see disclaimer

ACUTE

early (stage I to II) classical HL: favourable disease and intended for combined-modality therapy

Back
1st line – 

ABVD (2 cycles) + interim PET/CT

The goal of treatment for all patients with HL is cure while minimising risk of toxicity and long-term complications.

The absence or presence of specific prognostic criteria determines whether the patient has favourable or unfavourable early-stage disease. German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) favourable prognosis criteria are most commonly used in the US (mediastinal mass ratio [MMR] <0.33; erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] <50 mm/hour if no B symptoms; ESR <30 mm/hour if B symptoms are present; involvement of ≤2 nodal sites; and no extranodal disease; see Diagnostic criteria).[44][50]

Patients with favourable early-stage disease generally receive two initial cycles of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) followed by an interim PET/CT scan to assess metabolic response and inform subsequent treatment.[33]

Metabolic response is determined using the Deauville criteria, which assigns a score of 1 to 5 based on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake at involved sites.[40]

Patients with a Deauville score of 1 to 3 (i.e., negative PET/CT) are considered to have a complete metabolic response. Patients with a Deauville score of 4 or 5 (i.e., positive PET/CT) are considered to have a partial metabolic response (see Diagnostic criteria).

A PET-adapted treatment approach is recommended for all patients with early-stage disease as it offers the opportunity to balance efficacy and toxicity of treatment.[5][33][54]​​​[65][66][74][75]

The most effective treatment for early-stage disease is combined-modality therapy, which comprises combination chemotherapy (e.g., ABVD) followed by radiotherapy.[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]​ 

A chemotherapy-alone approach may be considered if avoiding radiotherapy is preferred (e.g., due to patient age, sex, family history of cancer or cardiac disease, comorbidities, sites of involvement).[33][62][63][64][65][66]​ The decision to omit radiotherapy should involve expert input by a multidisciplinary team, and discussion with the patient regarding risks and benefits. Chemotherapy alone is associated with a slightly lower rate of tumour control and higher rate of relapse compared with combined-modality therapy, but survival rates are similar.[51][52][53][58][60][64][66][67][68]​ [69] [ Cochrane Clinical Answers logo ]

HL in older patients (aged >60 years) is associated with poorer outcomes and higher treatment-related toxicity and mortality compared with younger patients.[47][48][49]​​​​​ Alternative treatment regimens may be considered for patients >60 years, or with poor performance status or substantial comorbidities. Bleomycin should be used with caution; standard regimens may be adapted to remove bleomycin or restrict its use to only two cycles.[33]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Plus – 

radiotherapy (20 Gy) or ABVD (1 cycle) plus radiotherapy (30 Gy)

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with favourable early-stage disease who are intended for combined-modality therapy and have a Deauville score of 1 to 2 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of ABVD) can receive 20 Gy radiotherapy, or one additional cycle of ABVD followed by 30 Gy radiotherapy.[60][61][65][67]

Involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) is preferred to traditional involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) due to its lower risk of adverse effects.[70][71][72][73] ISRT focuses radiation only on involved lymph nodes and nearby sites, minimising radiation exposure to uninvolved structures.

Acute adverse effects of radiotherapy depend on the region treated and the dose employed. Patients receiving treatment to the mediastinum can develop oesophagitis, clinically apparent as odynophagia that sometimes requires opioid analgesics to maintain oral intake. Infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy can cause nausea and/or diarrhoea. Fatigue is common in all patients receiving radiotherapy. Possible long-term adverse effects of radiotherapy include secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and decreased pulmonary function.

Patients should be assessed for suitability for radiotherapy (e.g., based on age, sex, family history of cancer or cardiac disease, comorbidities, sites of involvement).[33] Those deemed unsuitable for radiotherapy can be considered for treatment with chemotherapy alone.

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Plus – 

radiotherapy (20 Gy) or ABVD (2 cycles) plus radiotherapy (30 Gy)

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with favourable early-stage disease who are intended for combined-modality therapy and have a Deauville score of 3 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of ABVD) can receive 20 Gy radiotherapy, or two additional cycle of ABVD followed by 30 Gy radiotherapy (based on the RAPID study).[61][65]

Involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) is preferred to traditional involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) due to its lower risk of adverse effects.[70][71][72][73] ISRT focuses radiation only on involved lymph nodes and nearby sites, minimising radiation exposure to uninvolved structures.

Acute adverse effects of radiotherapy depend on the region treated and the dose employed. Patients receiving treatment to the mediastinum can develop oesophagitis, clinically apparent as odynophagia that sometimes requires opioid analgesics to maintain oral intake. Infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy can cause nausea and/or diarrhoea. Fatigue is common in all patients receiving radiotherapy. Possible long-term adverse effects of radiotherapy include secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and decreased pulmonary function.

Patients should be assessed for suitability for radiotherapy (e.g., based on age, sex, family history of cancer or cardiac disease, comorbidities, sites of involvement).[33] Those deemed unsuitable for radiotherapy can be considered for treatment with chemotherapy alone.

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Plus – 

ABVD (2 cycles) + restaging PET/CT

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with favourable early-stage disease who are intended for combined-modality therapy and have a Deauville score of 4 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of ABVD) can receive two additional cycles of ABVD followed by a restaging PET/CT scan to assess metabolic response and inform subsequent treatment.[60][65] [67]

Metabolic response is determined using the Deauville criteria, which assigns a score of 1 to 5 based on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake at involved sites.[40]

Patients with a Deauville score 1 to 3 (i.e., negative PET/CT) are considered to have a complete metabolic response. Patients with a Deauville score 4 or 5 (i.e., positive PET/CT) are considered to have a partial metabolic response (see Diagnostic criteria).

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Consider – 

radiotherapy (30 Gy) (if restaging PET/CT negative)

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

If restaging PET/CT is negative (Deauville score 1 to 3) then 30 Gy radiotherapy can be given.[60][65][67]

Involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) is preferred to traditional involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) due to its lower risk of adverse effects.[70][71][72][73]​​ ISRT focuses radiation only on involved lymph nodes and nearby sites, minimising radiation exposure to uninvolved structures.

Acute adverse effects of radiotherapy depend on the region treated and the dose employed. Patients receiving treatment to the mediastinum can develop oesophagitis, clinically apparent as odynophagia that sometimes requires opioid analgesics to maintain oral intake. Infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy can cause nausea and/or diarrhoea. Fatigue is common in all patients receiving radiotherapy. Possible long-term adverse effects of radiotherapy include secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and decreased pulmonary function.

Back
Consider – 

biopsy (if restaging PET/CT positive)

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

If restaging PET/CT is positive (Deauville score 4 or 5) then a biopsy is recommended to inform subsequent treatment (e.g., salvage therapy).[33]

Back
Plus – 

biopsy

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

A biopsy is recommended to inform subsequent treatment (e.g., salvage therapy) for patients with a Deauville score of 5 on interim PET/CT (after two cycles of ABVD).[33]

early (stage I to II) classical HL: favourable disease and intended for chemotherapy alone

Back
1st line – 

ABVD (2 cycles) + interim PET/CT

The goal of treatment for all patients with HL is cure while minimising risk of toxicity and long-term complications.

The absence or presence of specific prognostic criteria determines whether the patient has favourable or unfavourable early-stage disease. German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) favourable prognosis criteria are most commonly used in the US (mediastinal mass ratio [MMR] <0.33; erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] <50 mm/hour if no B symptoms; ESR <30 mm/hour if B symptoms are present; involvement of ≤2 nodal sites; and no extranodal disease; see Diagnostic criteria).[44][50]​ 

Patients with favourable early-stage disease generally receive two initial cycles of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) followed by an interim PET/CT scan to assess metabolic response and inform subsequent treatment.[33]

Metabolic response is determined using the Deauville criteria, which assigns a score of 1 to 5 based on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake at involved sites.[40]

Patients with a Deauville score of 1 to 3 (i.e., negative PET/CT) are considered to have a complete metabolic response. Patients with a Deauville score of 4 or 5 (i.e., positive PET/CT) are considered to have a partial metabolic response (see Diagnostic criteria).

A PET-adapted treatment approach is recommended for all patients with early-stage disease as it offers the opportunity to balance efficacy and toxicity of treatment.[5][33][54][65][66][74][75]

The most effective treatment for early-stage disease is combined-modality therapy, which comprises combination chemotherapy (e.g., ABVD) followed by radiotherapy.[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]

A chemotherapy-alone approach may be considered if avoiding radiotherapy is preferred (e.g., due to patient age, sex, family history of cancer or cardiac disease, comorbidities, sites of involvement).[33][62][63][64][65][66]​ The decision to omit radiotherapy should involve expert input by a multidisciplinary team, and discussion with the patient regarding risks and benefits. Chemotherapy alone is associated with a slightly lower rate of tumour control and higher rate of relapse compared with combined-modality therapy, but survival rates are similar.[51][52][53][58][60][64][66][67][68]​ [69] [ Cochrane Clinical Answers logo ]

HL in older patients (aged >60 years) is associated with poorer outcomes and higher treatment-related toxicity and mortality compared with younger patients.[47][48][49]​​​​​ Alternative treatment regimens may be considered for patients >60 years, or with poor performance status or substantial comorbidities. Bleomycin should be used with caution; standard regimens may be adapted to remove bleomycin or restrict its use to only two cycles.[33]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Plus – 

ABVD (2 cycles)

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with favourable early-stage disease who are intended for chemotherapy alone and have a Deauville score of 1 or 2 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of ABVD) can receive two additional cycles of ABVD.[60][64][66][67]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Plus – 

ABVD (2 cycles) or AVD (4 cycles)

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with favourable early-stage disease who are intended for chemotherapy alone and have a Deauville score of 3 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of ABVD) can receive two additional cycles of ABVD or four additional cycles of AVD (doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine).[60][64][66][67][68]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

OR

AVD

doxorubicin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Plus – 

ABVD (2 cycles) + restaging PET/CT

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with favourable early-stage disease who are intended for chemotherapy alone and have a Deauville score of 4 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of ABVD) can receive two additional cycles of ABVD followed by a restaging PET/CT scan to assess metabolic response and inform subsequent treatment.[60][64][66][67]

Metabolic response is determined using the Deauville criteria, which assigns a score of 1 to 5 based on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake at involved sites.[40]

Patients with a Deauville score 1 to 3 (i.e., negative PET/CT) are considered to have a complete metabolic response. Patients with a Deauville score 4 or 5 (i.e., positive PET/CT) are considered to have a partial metabolic response (see Diagnostic criteria).

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Consider – 

radiotherapy (30 Gy) (if restaging PET/CT negative)

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

If restaging PET/CT is negative (Deauville score 1 to 3) then 30 Gy radiotherapy should be considered.[60][65][67]

Involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) is preferred to traditional involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) due to its lower risk of adverse effects.[70][71][72][73] ISRT focuses radiation only on involved lymph nodes and nearby sites, minimising radiation exposure to uninvolved structures.

Acute adverse effects of radiotherapy depend on the region treated and the dose employed. Patients receiving treatment to the mediastinum can develop oesophagitis, clinically apparent as odynophagia that sometimes requires opioid analgesics to maintain oral intake. Infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy can cause nausea and/or diarrhoea. Fatigue is common in all patients receiving radiotherapy. Possible long-term adverse effects of radiotherapy include secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and decreased pulmonary function.

Back
Consider – 

biopsy (if restaging PET/CT positive)

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

If restaging PET/CT is positive (Deauville score 4 or 5) then a biopsy is recommended to inform subsequent treatment (e.g., salvage therapy).[33]

Back
Plus – 

biopsy

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

A biopsy is recommended to inform subsequent treatment (e.g., salvage therapy) for patients with a Deauville score of 5 on interim PET/CT (after two cycles of ABVD).[33] 

early (stage I to II) classical HL: unfavourable disease (non-bulky or bulky) and intended for combined-modality therapy

Back
1st line – 

ABVD (2 cycles) + interim PET/CT

The goal of treatment for all patients with HL is cure while minimising risk of toxicity and long-term complications.

The absence or presence of specific prognostic criteria determines whether the patient has favourable or unfavourable early-stage disease. German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) favourable prognosis criteria are most commonly used in the US (mediastinal mass ratio [MMR] <0.33; erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] <50 mm/hour if no B symptoms; ESR <30 mm/hour if B symptoms are present; involvement of ≤2 nodal sites; and no extranodal disease; see Diagnostic criteria).[44][50]

Patients with unfavourable early-stage disease generally receive two initial cycles of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) followed by an interim PET/CT scan to assess metabolic response and inform subsequent treatment.

Metabolic response is determined using the Deauville criteria, which assigns a score of 1 to 5 based on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake at involved sites.[40]

Patients with a Deauville score of 1 to 3 (i.e., negative PET/CT) are considered to have a complete metabolic response. Patients with a Deauville score of 4 or 5 (i.e., positive PET/CT) are considered to have a partial metabolic response (see Diagnostic criteria).

A PET-adapted treatment approach is recommended for all patients with early-stage disease as it offers the opportunity to balance efficacy and toxicity of treatment.[5][33][54][65][66][74][75]

The most effective treatment for early-stage disease is combined-modality therapy, which comprises combination chemotherapy (e.g., ABVD) followed by radiotherapy.[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]

A chemotherapy-alone approach may be considered if avoiding radiotherapy is preferred (e.g., due to patient age, sex, family history of cancer or cardiac disease, comorbidities, sites of involvement).[33][62][63][64][65][66]​ The decision to omit radiotherapy should involve expert input by a multidisciplinary team, and discussion with the patient regarding risks and benefits. Chemotherapy alone is associated with a slightly lower rate of tumour control and higher rate of relapse compared with combined-modality therapy, but survival rates are similar.[51][52][53][58][60][64][66][67][68]​ [69] [ Cochrane Clinical Answers logo ]

HL in older patients (aged >60 years) is associated with poorer outcomes and higher treatment-related toxicity and mortality compared with younger patients.[47][48][49]​​​​​ Alternative treatment regimens may be considered for patients >60 years, or with poor performance status or substantial comorbidities. Bleomycin should be used with caution; standard regimens may be adapted to remove bleomycin or restrict its use to only two cycles.[33]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Plus – 

ABVD (2 cycles) + radiotherapy (30 Gy)

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with unfavourable early-stage disease (non-bulky or bulky) who are intended for combined-modality therapy and have a Deauville score of 1 to 3 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of ABVD) can receive two additional cycles of ABVD followed by 30 Gy radiotherapy.[54][60][67]

Involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) is preferred to traditional involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) due to its lower risk of adverse effects.[70][71][72][73]​ ISRT focuses radiation only on involved lymph nodes and nearby sites, minimising radiation exposure to uninvolved structures.

Acute adverse effects of radiotherapy depend on the region treated and the dose employed. Patients receiving treatment to the mediastinum can develop oesophagitis, clinically apparent as odynophagia that sometimes requires opioid analgesics to maintain oral intake. Infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy can cause nausea and/or diarrhoea. Fatigue is common in all patients receiving radiotherapy. Possible long-term adverse effects of radiotherapy include secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and decreased pulmonary function.

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Plus – 

ABVD (2 cycles) or escalated BEACOPP (2 cycles) + restaging PET/CT

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with unfavourable early-stage disease (non-bulky or bulky) who are intended for combined-modality therapy and have a Deauville score of 4 or 5 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of ABVD) can receive two additional cycles of ABVD or escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisolone), followed by a restaging PET/CT scan to assess metabolic response and inform subsequent treatment.[54][60][67]

Metabolic response is determined using the Deauville criteria, which assigns a score of 1 to 5 based on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake at involved sites.[40]

Patients with a Deauville score 1 to 3 (i.e., negative PET/CT) are considered to have a complete metabolic response. Patients with a Deauville score 4 or 5 (i.e., positive PET/CT) are considered to have a partial metabolic response (see Diagnostic criteria).

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

OR

BEACOPP

bleomycin

and

etoposide

and

doxorubicin

and

cyclophosphamide

and

vincristine

and

procarbazine

and

prednisolone

Back
Consider – 

radiotherapy (30 Gy) (if restaging PET/CT negative)

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

If restaging PET/CT is negative (Deauville score 1 to 3) then 30 Gy radiotherapy can be given.[54][60][67]

Involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) is preferred to traditional involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) due to its lower risk of adverse effects.[70][71][72] ISRT focuses radiation only on involved lymph nodes and nearby sites, minimising radiation exposure to uninvolved structures.

Acute adverse effects of radiotherapy depend on the region treated and the dose employed. Patients receiving treatment to the mediastinum can develop oesophagitis, clinically apparent as odynophagia that sometimes requires opioid analgesics to maintain oral intake. Infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy can cause nausea and/or diarrhoea. Fatigue is common in all patients receiving radiotherapy. Possible long-term adverse effects of radiotherapy include secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and decreased pulmonary function.

Back
Consider – 

biopsy (if restaging PET/CT positive)

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

If restaging PET/CT is positive (Deauville score 4 or 5) then a biopsy is recommended to inform subsequent treatment (e.g., salvage therapy).[33] 

early (stage I to II) classical HL: unfavourable disease (non-bulky) and intended for chemotherapy alone

Back
1st line – 

ABVD (2 cycles) + interim PET/CT

The goal of treatment for all patients with HL is cure while minimising risk of toxicity and long-term complications.

The absence or presence of specific prognostic criteria determines whether the patient has favourable or unfavourable early-stage disease. German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) favourable prognosis criteria are most commonly used in the US (mediastinal mass ratio [MMR] <0.33; erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] <50 mm/hour if no B symptoms; ESR <30 mm/hour if B symptoms are present; involvement of ≤2 nodal sites; and no extranodal disease; see Diagnostic criteria).[44][50]

Patients with unfavourable early-stage disease generally receive two initial cycles of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) followed by an interim PET/CT scan to assess metabolic response and inform subsequent treatment.

Metabolic response is determined using the Deauville criteria, which assigns a score of 1 to 5 based on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake at involved sites.[40]

Patients with a Deauville score of 1 to 3 (i.e., negative PET/CT) are considered to have a complete metabolic response. Patients with a Deauville score of 4 or 5 (i.e., positive PET/CT) are considered to have a partial metabolic response (see Diagnostic criteria).

A PET-adapted treatment approach is recommended for all patients with early-stage disease as it offers the opportunity to balance efficacy and toxicity of treatment.[5][33][54][65]​​​​[66][74][75]

The most effective treatment for early-stage disease is combined-modality therapy, which comprises combination chemotherapy (e.g., ABVD) followed by radiotherapy.[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]​ 

A chemotherapy-alone approach may be considered if avoiding radiotherapy is preferred (e.g., due to patient age, sex, family history of cancer or cardiac disease, comorbidities, sites of involvement).[33][62][63][64][65][66]​ The decision to omit radiotherapy should involve expert input by a multidisciplinary team, and discussion with the patient regarding risks and benefits. Chemotherapy alone is associated with a slightly lower rate of tumour control and higher rate of relapse compared with combined-modality therapy, but survival rates are similar.[51][52][53][58][60][64][66][67][68]​ [69] [ Cochrane Clinical Answers logo ]

HL in older patients (aged >60 years) is associated with poorer outcomes and higher treatment-related toxicity and mortality compared with younger patients.[47][48][49]​​​​​ Alternative treatment regimens may be considered for patients >60 years, or with poor performance status or substantial comorbidities. Bleomycin should be used with caution; standard regimens may be adapted to remove bleomycin or restrict its use to only two cycles.[33]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Plus – 

ABVD (2 cycles)

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with unfavourable early-stage disease (non-bulky) who are intended for chemotherapy alone and have a Deauville score of 1 or 2 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of ABVD) can receive two additional cycles of ABVD.[60][64][66][67]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Plus – 

ABVD (2 cycles) or AVD (4 cycles)

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with unfavourable early-stage disease (non-bulky) who are intended for chemotherapy alone and have a Deauville score of 3 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of ABVD) can receive two additional cycles of ABVD or four additional cycles of AVD (doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine).[68]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

OR

AVD

doxorubicin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Plus – 

ABVD (2 cycles) + restaging PET/CT

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with unfavourable early-stage disease (non-bulky) who are intended for chemotherapy alone and have a Deauville score of 4 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of ABVD) can receive two additional cycles of ABVD followed by a restaging PET/CT scan to assess metabolic response and inform subsequent treatment.[60][64][66][67]

Metabolic response is determined using the Deauville criteria, which assigns a score of 1 to 5 based on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake at involved sites.[40]

Patients with a Deauville score 1 to 3 (i.e., negative PET/CT) are considered to have a complete metabolic response. Patients with a Deauville score 4 or 5 (i.e., positive PET/CT) are considered to have a partial metabolic response (see Diagnostic criteria).

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Consider – 

AVD (2 cycles) + radiotherapy (30 Gy) (if restaging PET/CT negative)

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

If restaging PET/CT is negative (Deauville score 1 to 3) then two additional cycles of AVD (doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) followed by 30 Gy radiotherapy should be considered.[60][65][67]

Involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) is preferred to traditional involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) due to its lower risk of adverse effects.[70][71][72][73] ISRT focuses radiation only on involved lymph nodes and nearby sites, minimising radiation exposure to uninvolved structures.

Acute adverse effects of radiotherapy depend on the region treated and the dose employed. Patients receiving treatment to the mediastinum can develop oesophagitis, clinically apparent as odynophagia that sometimes requires opioid analgesics to maintain oral intake. Infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy can cause nausea and/or diarrhoea. Fatigue is common in all patients receiving radiotherapy. Possible long-term adverse effects of radiotherapy include secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and decreased pulmonary function.

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

AVD

doxorubicin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Consider – 

biopsy (if restaging PET/CT positive)

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

If restaging PET/CT is positive (Deauville score 4 or 5) then a biopsy is recommended to inform subsequent treatment (e.g., salvage therapy).[33] 

Back
Plus – 

biopsy

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

A biopsy is recommended to inform subsequent treatment (e.g., salvage therapy) for patients with a Deauville score of 5 on interim PET/CT (after two cycles of ABVD).[33]

early (stage I to II) classical HL: unfavourable disease (bulky) and intended for chemotherapy alone

Back
1st line – 

ABVD (2 cycles) + interim PET/CT

The goal of treatment for all patients with HL is cure while minimising risk of toxicity and long-term complications.

The absence or presence of specific prognostic criteria determines whether the patient has favourable or unfavourable early-stage disease. German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) favourable prognosis criteria are most commonly used in the US (mediastinal mass ratio [MMR] <0.33; erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR] <50 mm/hour if no B symptoms; ESR <30 mm/hour if B symptoms are present; involvement of ≤2 nodal sites; and no extranodal disease; see Diagnostic criteria).[44][50]

Patients with unfavourable early-stage disease generally receive two initial cycles of ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) followed by an interim PET/CT scan to assess metabolic response and inform subsequent treatment.

Metabolic response is determined using the Deauville criteria, which assigns a score of 1 to 5 based on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake at involved sites.[40]

Patients with a Deauville score of 1 to 3 (i.e., negative PET/CT) are considered to have a complete metabolic response. Patients with a Deauville score of 4 or 5 (i.e., positive PET/CT) are considered to have a partial metabolic response (see Diagnostic criteria).

A PET-adapted treatment approach is recommended for all patients with early-stage disease as it offers the opportunity to balance efficacy and toxicity of treatment.[5][33][54]​​​​[65][66][74][75]

The most effective treatment for early-stage disease is combined-modality therapy, which comprises combination chemotherapy (e.g., ABVD) followed by radiotherapy.[51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]​ 

A chemotherapy-alone approach may be considered if avoiding radiotherapy is preferred (e.g., due to patient age, sex, family history of cancer or cardiac disease, comorbidities, sites of involvement).[33][62][63][64][65][66]​ The decision to omit radiotherapy should involve expert input by a multidisciplinary team, and discussion with the patient regarding risks and benefits. Chemotherapy alone is associated with a slightly lower rate of tumour control and higher rate of relapse compared with combined-modality therapy, but survival rates are similar.[51][52][53][58][60][64][66][67][68]​ [69] [ Cochrane Clinical Answers logo ]

HL in older patients (aged >60 years) is associated with poorer outcomes and higher treatment-related toxicity and mortality compared with younger patients.[47][48][49]​​​​​ Alternative treatment regimens may be considered for patients >60 years, or with poor performance status or substantial comorbidities. Bleomycin should be used with caution; standard regimens may be adapted to remove bleomycin or restrict its use to only two cycles.[33]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Plus – 

AVD (4 cycles)

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with unfavourable early-stage disease (bulky) who are intended for chemotherapy alone and have a Deauville score of 1 to 3 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of ABVD) can receive four additional cycles of AVD (doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine).[68]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

AVD

doxorubicin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Plus – 

escalated BEACOPP (2 cycles) + restaging PET/CT

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with unfavourable early-stage disease (bulky) who are intended for chemotherapy alone and have a Deauville score of 4 or 5 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of ABVD) can receive two additional cycles of escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisolone) followed by a restaging PET/CT scan to assess metabolic response and inform subsequent treatment.[54][60][68][76][77]

Metabolic response is determined using the Deauville criteria, which assigns a score of 1 to 5 based on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake at involved sites.[40]

Patients with a Deauville score 1 to 3 (i.e., negative PET/CT) are considered to have a complete metabolic response. Patients with a Deauville score 4 or 5 (i.e., positive PET/CT) are considered to have a partial metabolic response (see Diagnostic criteria).

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

BEACOPP

bleomycin

and

etoposide

and

doxorubicin

and

cyclophosphamide

and

vincristine

and

procarbazine

and

prednisolone

Back
Consider – 

escalated BEACOPP (2 cycles) (if restaging PET/CT negative)

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

If restaging PET/CT is negative (Deauville score 1 to 3) then two additional cycles of escalated BEACOPP can be given.[54][60][68][76][77]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

BEACOPP

bleomycin

and

etoposide

and

doxorubicin

and

cyclophosphamide

and

vincristine

and

procarbazine

and

prednisolone

Back
Consider – 

biopsy (if restaging PET/CT positive)

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

If restaging PET/CT is positive (Deauville score 4 or 5) then a biopsy is recommended to inform subsequent treatment (e.g., salvage therapy).[33] 

advanced (stage III to IV) classical HL: intended for standard induction therapy (chemotherapy)

Back
1st line – 

ABVD (2 cycles) + interim PET/CT

The goal of treatment for all patients with HL is cure while minimising risk of toxicity and long-term complications.

ABVD is a preferred initial treatment for patients with advanced-stage disease.[33][68]

A PET-adapted treatment approach can be used in patients with advanced-stage disease to guide treatment decisions regarding escalation or de-escalation of chemotherapy.[68][94][95][96]

Patients with advanced-stage disease who are intended for standard induction therapy with ABVD chemotherapy typically receive two initial cycles of ABVD, followed by an interim PET/CT scan to assess metabolic response and inform subsequent treatment.[68]

Metabolic response is determined using the Deauville criteria, which assigns a score of 1 to 5 based on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake at involved sites.[40]

Patients with a Deauville score of 1 to 3 (i.e., negative PET/CT) are considered to have a complete metabolic response. Patients with a Deauville score of 4 or 5 (i.e., positive PET/CT) are considered to have a partial metabolic response (see Diagnostic criteria).

HL in older patients (aged >60 years) is associated with poorer outcomes and higher treatment-related toxicity and mortality compared with younger patients.[47][48][49]​​​​​ Alternative treatment regimens may be considered for patients >60 years, or with poor performance status or substantial comorbidities. Bleomycin should be used with caution; standard regimens may be adapted to remove bleomycin or restrict its use to only two cycles.[33]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Plus – 

AVD (4 cycles)

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with advanced-stage disease who have a Deauville score of 1 to 3 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of ABVD) can receive four additional cycles of AVD (doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine).[33][68] 

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

AVD

doxorubicin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Plus – 

escalated BEACOPP (3 cycles) + restaging PET/CT

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with advanced-stage disease who are aged ≤60 years and have a Deauville score of 4 or 5 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of ABVD) can receive three additional cycles of escalated BEACOPP, followed by a restaging PET/CT scan to assess metabolic response and inform subsequent treatment.[68] 

Metabolic response is determined using the Deauville criteria, which assigns a score of 1 to 5 based on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake at involved sites.[40]

Patients with a Deauville score of 1 to 3 (i.e., negative PET/CT) are considered to have a complete metabolic response. Patients with a Deauville score of 4 or 5 (i.e., positive PET/CT) are considered to have a partial metabolic response (see Diagnostic criteria).

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

BEACOPP

bleomycin

and

etoposide

and

doxorubicin

and

cyclophosphamide

and

vincristine

and

procarbazine

and

prednisolone

Back
Consider – 

escalated BEACOPP (1 cycle) ± radiotherapy (if restaging PET/CT negative)

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

If restaging PET/CT is negative (Deauville score 1 to 3) then one additional cycle of escalated BEACOPP can be given.[68]

Consolidation radiotherapy (i.e., after initial chemotherapy) can be avoided in patients with advanced-stage disease if end-of-treatment PET/CT is negative.[76][82][97][98][99][100][101][102] 

Consolidation radiotherapy (30 to 36 Gy) may be considered for patients with residual PET-positive disease following completion of initial treatment with chemotherapy.

Involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) is preferred to traditional involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) due to its lower risk of adverse effects.[70][71][72][73] ISRT focuses radiation only on involved lymph nodes and nearby sites, minimising radiation exposure to uninvolved structures.

Acute adverse effects of radiotherapy depend on the region treated and the dose employed. Patients receiving treatment to the mediastinum can develop oesophagitis, clinically apparent as odynophagia that sometimes requires opioid analgesics to maintain oral intake. Infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy can cause nausea and/or diarrhoea. Fatigue is common in all patients receiving radiotherapy. Possible long-term adverse effects of radiotherapy include secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and decreased pulmonary function.

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

BEACOPP

bleomycin

and

etoposide

and

doxorubicin

and

cyclophosphamide

and

vincristine

and

procarbazine

and

prednisolone

Back
Consider – 

biopsy (if restaging PET/CT positive)

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

If restaging PET/CT is positive (Deauville score 4 or 5) then a biopsy is recommended to inform subsequent treatment (e.g., salvage therapy).[33] 

Back
Plus – 

individualised treatment

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with advanced-stage disease aged >60 years who have a Deauville score of 4 or 5 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of ABVD) are recommended individualised treatment to minimise toxicity while maintaining efficacy.[5][33]

Bleomycin should be used with caution; standard regimens may be adapted to remove bleomycin or restrict its use to only two cycles.[5][33]​ 

advanced (stage III to IV) classical HL: intended for standard induction therapy (chemoimmunotherapy)

Back
1st line – 

brentuximab vedotin + AVD

The goal of treatment for all patients with HL is cure while minimising risk of toxicity and long-term complications.

Brentuximab vedotin plus AVD (doxorubicin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) is a preferred initial treatment for patients with advanced-stage disease.[33][68]

Brentuximab vedotin plus AVD offers a survival advantage compared with ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) in patients with advanced-stage disease.[33][86][87][88]​ However, caution is required when used in older patients (age >60 years) and in those with baseline neuropathy.

HL in older patients (aged >60 years) is associated with poorer outcomes and higher treatment-related toxicity and mortality compared with younger patients.[47][48][49]​​​​​ Alternative treatment regimens may be considered for patients >60 years, or with poor performance status or substantial comorbidities. Bleomycin should be used with caution; standard regimens may be adapted to remove bleomycin or restrict its use to only two cycles.[33]

For older patients, sequential brentuximab vedotin plus AVD may be a preferred option.[84] This involves administeriing 2 cycles of brentuximab vedotin followed by 6 cycles of AVD followed by 4 cycles of brentuximab vedotin.[84]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

brentuximab vedotin

and

doxorubicin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

advanced (stage III to IV) classical HL: intended for intensive induction chemotherapy

Back
1st line – 

escalated BEACOPP (2 cycles) + interim PET/CT

The goal of treatment for all patients with HL is cure while minimising risk of toxicity and long-term complications.

A PET-adapted treatment approach can be used in patients with advanced-stage disease to guide treatment decisions regarding escalation or de-escalation of chemotherapy.[68][94][95][96]

Selected patients with advanced-stage disease (e.g., those with an International Prognostic Score [IPS] ≥4 and age <60 years) may be suitable for upfront intensive induction chemotherapy comprising two initial cycles of escalated BEACOPP (bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisolone), followed by an interim PET/CT scan to assess metabolic response and inform subsequent treatment.[94][95]

Metabolic response is determined using the Deauville criteria, which assigns a score of 1 to 5 based on fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake at involved sites.[40]

Patients with a Deauville score of 1 to 3 (i.e., negative PET/CT) are considered to have a complete metabolic response. Patients with a Deauville score of 4 or 5 (i.e., positive PET/CT) are considered to have a partial metabolic response (see Diagnostic criteria).

HL in older patients (aged >60 years) is associated with poorer outcomes and higher treatment-related toxicity and mortality compared with younger patients.[47][48][49]​​​​​ Alternative treatment regimens may be considered for patients >60 years, or with poor performance status or substantial comorbidities. Bleomycin should be used with caution; standard regimens may be adapted to remove bleomycin or restrict its use to only two cycles.[33]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

BEACOPP

bleomycin

and

etoposide

and

doxorubicin

and

cyclophosphamide

and

vincristine

and

procarbazine

and

prednisolone

Back
Plus – 

escalated BEACOPP (2 cycles) or ABVD (4 cycles)

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with advanced-stage disease who have a Deauville score of 1 to 3 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of escalated BEACOPP) can receive two additional cycles of escalated BEACOPP or four additional cycles of ABVD.[33][94][95][96]

Bleomycin may be omitted from ABVD to reduce toxicity.

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

BEACOPP

bleomycin

and

etoposide

and

doxorubicin

and

cyclophosphamide

and

vincristine

and

procarbazine

and

prednisolone

OR

ABVD

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

Back
Plus – 

biopsy or treatment escalation

Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group

Patients with advanced-stage disease who have a Deauville score of 4 or 5 on interim PET/CT (after two initial cycles of escalated BEACOPP) are recommended a biopsy to inform subsequent treatment (e.g., salvage therapy or treatment escalation).[33] 

Patients with a positive biopsy may require salvage therapy.

Patients with a negative biopsy can receive two additional cycles of escalated BEACOPP followed by a restaging PET/CT scan.[94][95][96] If restaging PET/CT is negative (Deauville score 1 to 3) then two additional cycles of escalated BEACOPP can be given.[33][94][95][96] If restaging PET/CT is positive (Deauville score 4 or 5) then another biopsy is recommended.[33]

Consolidation radiotherapy (i.e., after initial chemotherapy) can be avoided in patients with advanced-stage disease if end-of-treatment PET/CT is negative.[76][82][97][98][99][100][101][102] 

Consolidation radiotherapy (30 to 36 Gy) may be considered for patients with residual PET-positive disease following completion of initial treatment with chemotherapy.

Involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) is preferred to traditional involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) due to its lower risk of adverse effects.[70]​​[71][72][73]​ ISRT focuses radiation only on involved lymph nodes and nearby sites, minimising radiation exposure to uninvolved structures.

Acute adverse effects of radiotherapy depend on the region treated and the dose employed. Patients receiving treatment to the mediastinum can develop oesophagitis, clinically apparent as odynophagia that sometimes requires opioid analgesics to maintain oral intake. Infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy can cause nausea and/or diarrhoea. Fatigue is common in all patients receiving radiotherapy. Possible long-term adverse effects of radiotherapy include secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and decreased pulmonary function.

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

BEACOPP

bleomycin

and

etoposide

and

doxorubicin

and

cyclophosphamide

and

vincristine

and

procarbazine

and

prednisolone

asymptomatic early (stage IA to IIA) NLPHL, non-bulky disease

Back
1st line – 

radiotherapy (30-36 Gy) or observation

Nodular lymphocyte-predominant HL (NLPHL) is a rare subtype of HL.

Most patients with NLPHL present with early-stage disease involving peripheral nodal regions (e.g., groin, axilla, neck).

The goal of treatment is cure while minimising risk of late effects. Overall prognosis for patients with early-stage NLPHL is excellent.

Radiotherapy alone at a dose 30 to 36 Gy is recommended for most patients with asymptomatic early (stage IA and IIA) non-bulky NLPHL.[33][70][131]

Involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) is the preferred approach (although most available data are for involved-field radiotherapy [IFRT]).[70]

ISRT focuses radiation only on involved lymph nodes and nearby sites rather than lymph node regions (which is done with IFRT), therefore minimising radiation exposure to uninvolved structures and reduces the risk of adverse effects.

Acute adverse effects of radiotherapy depend on the region treated and the dose employed. Most patients receiving treatment to the mediastinum develop oesophagitis, clinically apparent as odynophagia that sometimes requires opioid analgesics to maintain oral intake. Infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy can cause nausea and/or diarrhoea. Fatigue is common in all patients receiving radiotherapy. Possible long-term adverse effects of radiotherapy include secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and decreased pulmonary function.

Retrospective studies have reported excellent remission and survival outcomes with radio therapy alone for early-stage NLPHL.[132][133][134][135] Randomised trials of treatments for NLPHL are lacking due to the rarity of this disease subtype.

Observation may be appropriate for patients with asymptomatic early-stage non-bulky disease, particularly if there is concern regarding toxicity related to radiotherapy.[136] Observation is also an option for selected patients with stage IA non-bulky disease who have a completely excised solitary lymph node.[33]

asymptomatic early (stage IA to IIA) NLPHL, bulky disease; and symptomatic early (stage IB to IIB) NLPHL

Back
1st line – 

rituximab + chemotherapy + radiotherapy; or observation (if asymptomatic)

Nodular lymphocyte-predominant HL (NLPHL) is a rare subtype of HL.

Most patients with NLPHL present with early-stage disease involving peripheral nodal regions (e.g., groin, axilla, neck).

The goal of treatment is cure while minimising risk of late effects. Overall prognosis for patients with early-stage NLPHL is excellent.

Systemic treatment with rituximab plus combination chemotherapy (e.g., R-ABVD [rituximab, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine], R-CHOP [rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone], or R-CVbP [rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vinblastine, prednisolone]) followed by radiotherapy (30 to 36 Gy) is recommended for patients with asymptomatic early (stage IA and IIA) bulky NLPHL, and those with symptomatic early NLPHL (stage IB to IIB).[33]​​​[131][137]

The CD20 antigen is present on most NLPHL cells; therefore, anti-CD20 treatment with rituximab is a key component of systemic treatment for NLPHL.

Involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) is preferred to traditional involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) due to its lower risk of adverse effects.[70][71][72][73] ISRT focuses radiation only on involved lymph nodes and nearby sites, minimising radiation exposure to uninvolved structures.

Acute adverse effects of radiotherapy depend on the region treated and the dose employed. Patients receiving treatment to the mediastinum can develop oesophagitis, clinically apparent as odynophagia that sometimes requires opioid analgesics to maintain oral intake. Infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy can cause nausea and/or diarrhoea. Fatigue is common in all patients receiving radiotherapy. Possible long-term adverse effects of radiotherapy include secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and decreased pulmonary function.

Observation may be appropriate for patients with asymptomatic early-stage bulky disease, particularly if there is concern regarding toxicity related to systemic treatment and radiotherapy.[136]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

R-ABVD

rituximab

and

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

OR

R-CHOP

rituximab

and

cyclophosphamide

and

doxorubicin

and

vincristine

and

prednisolone

OR

R-CVbP

rituximab

and

cyclophosphamide

and

vinblastine

and

prednisolone

advanced (stage III to IV) NLPHL

Back
1st line – 

observation or rituximab + chemotherapy (± radiotherapy)

Observation may be appropriate for patients with asymptomatic advanced-stage disease.[33][131]

Systemic treatment with rituximab plus combination chemotherapy (e.g., R-ABVD [rituximab, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine], R-CHOP [rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone], or R-CVbP [rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vinblastine, prednisolone]) with or without radiotherapy is recommended for patients with symptomatic advanced-stage disease or rapid progression.[33][138][139]​ 

The CD20 antigen is present on most NLPHL cells; therefore, anti-CD20 treatment with rituximab is a key component of systemic treatment for NLPHL.

Involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT) is preferred to traditional involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) due to its lower risk of adverse effects.[70][71][72][73]​ ISRT focuses radiation only on involved lymph nodes and nearby sites, minimising radiation exposure to uninvolved structures.

Acute adverse effects of radiotherapy depend on the region treated and the dose employed. Patients receiving treatment to the mediastinum can develop oesophagitis, clinically apparent as odynophagia that sometimes requires opioid analgesics to maintain oral intake. Infradiaphragmatic radiotherapy can cause nausea and/or diarrhoea. Fatigue is common in all patients receiving radiotherapy. Possible long-term adverse effects of radiotherapy include secondary malignancies, cardiovascular disease, and decreased pulmonary function.

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

R-ABVD

rituximab

and

doxorubicin

and

bleomycin

and

vinblastine

and

dacarbazine

OR

R-CHOP

rituximab

and

cyclophosphamide

and

doxorubicin

and

vincristine

and

prednisolone

OR

R-CVbP

rituximab

and

cyclophosphamide

and

vinblastine

and

prednisolone

ONGOING

refractory or relapsed classical HL

Back
1st line – 

salvage therapy (combination chemotherapy) + PET/CT

Refractory or relapsed HL should be confirmed with biopsy.

Treatment for refractory or relapsed HL must be individualised, taking into consideration factors such as previous first-line treatment, patient age, medical comorbidities, duration of first remission, and stage at relapse. The goal of treatment, at least initially, is cure.

Salvage therapy, followed by high-dose chemotherapy (for conditioning) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), is the standard approach for most patients who relapse following first-line treatment.[33][103][104][105][106][107] 

The role of salvage therapy is to reduce tumour burden and mobilise stem cells before conditioning and ASCT.[5]

Combination chemotherapy regimens can be used for salvage therapy. The optimal salvage regimen is unclear due to the lack of head-to-head randomised trials; however, the following are commonly used: BeGEV (bendamustine, gemcitabine, vinorelbine); DHAP (dexamethasone, cytarabine, cisplatin); GVD (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin); ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide); IGEV (ifosfamide, gemcitabine, vinorelbine).[106][107][113][114][115][116][117][141]

A PET-adapted treatment approach is used for refractory or relapsed HL in order to optimise outcomes following stem cell transplantation. A negative pre-transplantation PET/CT (Deauville score 1 to 3) is associated with optimal outcomes following transplantation and should, therefore, be the goal of salvage therapy prior to ASCT.[123][124]​ Patients with a positive PET/CT (Deauville score 4 or 5) following salvage therapy may be considered for a different salvage regimen to achieve a negative PET/CT.[125][126][127]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

BeGEV

bendamustine

and

gemcitabine

and

vinorelbine

OR

DHAP

dexamethasone

and

cytarabine

and

cisplatin

OR

GVD

gemcitabine

and

vinorelbine

and

doxorubicin liposomal

OR

ICE

ifosfamide

and

carboplatin

and

etoposide

OR

IGEV

ifosfamide

and

gemcitabine

and

vinorelbine

Back
Consider – 

conditioning + stem cell transplantation (if PET/CT negative)

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

Patients with relapsed or refractory disease who are PET/CT negative (Deauville score 1 to 3) following salvage therapy can be considered for high-dose chemotherapy (for conditioning) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).[103][104][105][106][107]

Radiotherapy may be used alongside high-dose chemotherapy (as part of conditioning) in eligible patients.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (AlloSCT) may be considered in patients who relapse after ASCT, but this is controversial.[109][110]​ In selected patients, radiotherapy alone or chemotherapy alone is appropriate following salvage therapy.[111][112]

Back
Consider – 

brentuximab vedotin (maintenance)

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

Brentuximab vedotin (an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E) is approved for use as consolidation/maintenance therapy following ASCT in patients at high risk for relapse (e.g., those refractory to initial treatment; those who relapse within 12 months following initial treatment with ABVD or escalated BEACOPP; or those with extranodal disease).[128][129][130]

Maintenance brentuximab vedotin is recommended for 16 cycles (as per the AETHERA trial) or until unacceptable toxicity or relapse (whichever occurs first).[129]

It is not recommended in patients with prior evidence of disease refractory to brentuximab vedotin.[129] However, it may be considered for patients previously treated with brentuximab vedotin if durable remission (at least 12 months) was achieved before relapse.

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

brentuximab vedotin

Back
2nd line – 

salvage therapy (immunotherapy regimens)

Several immunotherapeutic agents are available for patients with relapsed or refractory classical HL.

The following immunotherapy-based combination regimens may be considered for use as salvage therapy before ASCT (in those who have not previously undergone ASCT) in the refractory or relapsed setting: brentuximab vedotin plus bendamustine; brentuximab vedotin plus nivolumab; brentuximab vedotin plus ICE (ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide); nivolumab plus ICE; or pembrolizumab plus GVD (gemcitabine, vinorelbine, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin).[118][119][120][121][122]

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

brentuximab vedotin

OR

brentuximab vedotin

and

bendamustine

OR

brentuximab vedotin

and

nivolumab

OR

brentuximab vedotin

and

ifosfamide

and

carboplatin

and

etoposide

OR

pembrolizumab

OR

pembrolizumab

and

gemcitabine

and

vinorelbine

and

doxorubicin liposomal

OR

nivolumab

OR

nivolumab

and

ifosfamide

and

carboplatin

and

etoposide

Back
Consider – 

conditioning + stem cell transplantation (if PET/CT negative)

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

Patients with relapsed or refractory disease who are PET/CT negative (Deauville score 1 to 3) following salvage therapy can be considered for high-dose chemotherapy (for conditioning) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT).[103][104][105][106][107]

Radiotherapy may be used alongside high-dose chemotherapy (as part of conditioning) in eligible patients.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (AlloSCT) may be considered in patients who relapse after ASCT, but this is controversial.[109][110]​ In selected patients, radiotherapy alone or chemotherapy alone is appropriate following salvage therapy.[111][112]

Back
Consider – 

brentuximab vedotin (maintenance)

Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group

Brentuximab vedotin (an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E) is approved for use as consolidation/maintenance therapy following ASCT in patients at high risk for relapse (e.g., those refractory to initial treatment; those who relapse within 12 months following initial treatment with ABVD or escalated BEACOPP; or those with extranodal disease).[128][129][130]

Maintenance brentuximab vedotin is recommended for 16 cycles (as per the AETHERA trial) or until unacceptable toxicity or relapse (whichever occurs first).[129]

It is not recommended in patients with prior evidence of disease refractory to brentuximab vedotin.[129] However, it may be considered for patients previously treated with brentuximab vedotin if durable remission (at least 12 months) was achieved before relapse.

See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.

Primary options

brentuximab vedotin

refractory or relapsed NLPHL

Back
1st line – 

salvage therapy or observation

Refractory or relapsed NLPHL should be confirmed by biopsy to rule out transformation to aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Treatment for refractory or relapsed NLPHL must be individualised, taking into consideration factors such as previous first-line treatment (e.g., R-ABVD [rituximab, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine] with radiotherapy), patient age, medical comorbidities, duration of first remission, and stage at relapse.[131]

Salvage therapy with a rituximab-based chemotherapy regimen or rituximab alone is the preferred approach for most patients with refractory or relapsed NLPHL. Observation may be considered for asymptomatic patients as an initial approach.[33] Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) may be considered for patients with aggressive disease.

The optimal regimen for salvage chemotherapy is unclear, but the following rituximab-based regimens can be considered if not previously used: R-ABVD; R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisolone); R-CVbP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vinblastine, prednisolone); rituximab plus bendamustine; R-DHAP (rituximab, dexamethasone, cytarabine, cisplatin); R-ICE (rituximab, ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide); or R-IGEV (rituximab, ifosfamide, gemcitabine, vinorelbine).

Rituximab alone can be considered for patients who relapse with limited stage disease and low tumour volume.[33][140] 

back arrow

Choose a patient group to see our recommendations

Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups. See disclaimer

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer