Compared with cephalic presentation, persistent breech presentation has increased frequency of cord prolapse, abruptio placentae, prelabor rupture of membranes, perinatal mortality, fetal distress (heart rate <100 bpm), preterm delivery, lower fetal weight.[10]Westgren M, Edvall H, Nordstrom L, et al. Spontaneous cephalic version of breech presentation in the last trimester. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985 Jan;92(1):19-22.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3881123?tool=bestpractice.com
[11]Brenner WE, Bruce RD, Hendricks CH. The characteristics and perils of breech presentation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1974 Mar 1;118(5):700-12.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4813810?tool=bestpractice.com
[69]Nassar N, Roberts CL, Cameron CA, et al. Outcomes of external cephalic version and breech presentation at term: an audit of deliveries at a Sydney tertiary obstetric hospital, 1997-2004. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2006;85(10):1231-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17068683?tool=bestpractice.com
There is a small increase in the risk of serious immediate maternal complications compared with vaginal birth (RR 1.29, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.61), including pulmonary embolism, infection, bleeding, damage to the bladder and bowel, slower recovery from the delivery, longer hospitalization, and delayed bonding and breast-feeding.[23]Waterstone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C. Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study. BMJ. 2001 May 5;322(7294):1089-93.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC31259
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11337436?tool=bestpractice.com
[30]Hofmeyr GJ, Hannah M, Lawrie TA. Planned caesarean section for term breech delivery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 21;(7):CD000166.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD000166.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26196961?tool=bestpractice.com
[48]Lydon-Rochelle M, Holt VL, Martin DP, et al. Association between method of delivery and maternal rehospitalisation. JAMA. 2000 May 10;283(18):2411-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10815084?tool=bestpractice.com
[49]Yokoe DS, Christiansen CL, Johnson R, et al. Epidemiology of and surveillance for postpartum infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001 Sep-Oct;7(5):837-41.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11747696?tool=bestpractice.com
[50]van Ham MA, van Dongen PW, Mulder J. Maternal consequences of caesarean section. A retrospective study of intra-operative and postoperative maternal complications of caesarean section during a 10-year period. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1997 Jul;74(1):1-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9243191?tool=bestpractice.com
[51]Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Verity L, et al. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. Lancet. 2001 Oct 13;358(9289):1203-7.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11675055?tool=bestpractice.com
[52]Lydon-Rochelle MT, Holt VL, Martin DP. Delivery method and self-reported postpartum general health status among primiparous women. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2001 Jul;15(3):232-40.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11489150?tool=bestpractice.com
[53]Wilson PD, Herbison RM, Herbison GP. Obstetric practice and the prevalence of urinary incontinence three months after delivery. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Feb;103(2):154-61.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8616133?tool=bestpractice.com
[54]Persson J, Wolner-Hanssen P, Rydhstroem H. Obstetric risk factors for stress urinary incontinence: a population-based study. Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Sep;96(3):440-5.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10960639?tool=bestpractice.com
[55]MacLennan AH, Taylor AW, Wilson DH, et al. The prevalence of pelvic disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery. BJOG. 2000 Dec;107(12):1460-70.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11192101?tool=bestpractice.com
[56]Thompson JF, Roberts CL, Currie M, et al. Prevalence and persistence of health problems after childbirth: associations with parity and method of birth. Birth. 2002 Jun;29(2):83-94.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12051189?tool=bestpractice.com
[57]Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's mothers and babies 2015 - in brief. October 2017 [internet publication].
https://www.aihw.gov.au/getmedia/728e7dc2-ced6-47b7-addd-befc9d95af2d/aihw-per-91-inbrief.pdf
[58]Mutryn CS. Psychosocial impact of cesarean section on the family: a literature review. Soc Sci Med. 1993 Nov;37(10):1271-81.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8272905?tool=bestpractice.com
[59]DiMatteo MR, Morton SC, Lepper HS, et al. Cesarean childbirth and psychosocial outcomes: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 1996 Jul;15(4):303-14.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8818678?tool=bestpractice.com
The long-term risks include potential compromise of future obstetric performance, increased risk of repeat cesarean section, infertility, uterine rupture, placenta accreta, placental abruption, and emergency hysterectomy.[60]Greene R, Gardeit F, Turner MJ. Long-term implications of cesarean section. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jan;176(1 Pt 1):254-5.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9024123?tool=bestpractice.com
[61]Coughlan C, Kearney R, Turner MJ. What are the implications for the next delivery in primigravidae who have an elective caesarean section for breech presentation? BJOG. 2002 Jun;109(6):624-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12118638?tool=bestpractice.com
[62]Hemminki E, Merilainen J. Long-term effects of cesarean sections: ectopic pregnancies and placental problems. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May;174(5):1569-74.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9065131?tool=bestpractice.com
[63]Gilliam M, Rosenberg D, Davis F. The likelihood of placenta previa with greater number of cesarean deliveries and higher parity. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Jun;99(6):976-80.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12052584?tool=bestpractice.com
The evidence suggests that using sutures, rather than staples, for wound closure after cesarean section reduces the incidence of wound dehiscence.[79]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Caesarean birth. Jan 2024 [internet publication].
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng192
Emergency cesarean section, compared with planned cesarean section, has demonstrated a higher risk of severe obstetric morbidity, intra-operative complications, postoperative complications, infection, blood loss >1500 mL, fever, pain, tiredness, and breast-feeding problems.[23]Waterstone M, Bewley S, Wolfe C. Incidence and predictors of severe obstetric morbidity: case-control study. BMJ. 2001 May 5;322(7294):1089-93.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC31259
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11337436?tool=bestpractice.com
[49]Yokoe DS, Christiansen CL, Johnson R, et al. Epidemiology of and surveillance for postpartum infections. Emerg Infect Dis. 2001 Sep-Oct;7(5):837-41.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11747696?tool=bestpractice.com
[51]Murphy DJ, Liebling RE, Verity L, et al. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study. Lancet. 2001 Oct 13;358(9289):1203-7.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11675055?tool=bestpractice.com
[72]Cockburn J, Foong C, Cockburn P. Undiagnosed breech. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1994 Jul;101(7):648-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8043554?tool=bestpractice.com
[83]Brown S, Lumley J. Maternal health after childbirth: results of an Australian population based survey. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 Feb;105(2):156-61.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9501779?tool=bestpractice.com