Treatment aims are to restore regional perfusion and improve oxygen delivery, to reverse hypotension, and to prevent organ damage from hypoperfusion. Volume resuscitation is generally accepted as the first-line intervention for shock, except for anaphylaxis (which requires immediate administration of intramuscular epinephrine [adrenaline]).[63]Golden DBK, Wang J, Waserman S, et al. Anaphylaxis: a 2023 practice parameter update. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024 Feb;132(2):124-76.
https://www.annallergy.org/article/S1081-1206(23)01304-2/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38108678?tool=bestpractice.com
[64]Panchal AR, Bartos JA, Cabañas JG, et al. Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2020 Oct 20;142(16_suppl_2):S366-S468.
https://www.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000916
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33081529?tool=bestpractice.com
[65]Lott C, Truhlář A, Alfonzo A, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines 2021: Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation. 2021 Apr;161:152-219.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.02.011
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33773826?tool=bestpractice.com
Further interventions are guided by the response to intravenous fluids and the likely etiology as investigations proceed. Evidence-based guidelines have been published for various subtypes of shock, including septic shock and acute heart failure, but not for the immediate management of undifferentiated shock.[2]Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-247.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486643
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34599691?tool=bestpractice.com
[3]McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-726.
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/36/3599/6358045
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447992?tool=bestpractice.com
[66]Nieminen MS, Böhm M, Cowie MR, et al. Executive summary of the guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of acute heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2005 Feb;26(4):384-416.
http://eurheartj.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/26/4/384
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15681577?tool=bestpractice.com
[67]Davis AL, Carcillo JA, Aneja RK, et al. American College of Critical Care Medicine clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2017 Jun;45(6):1061-93.
https://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/fulltext/2017/06000/american_college_of_critical_care_medicine.18.aspx
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28509730?tool=bestpractice.com
Early involvement of the critical care team is important for optimal management of the shock patient.
Airway, breathing, and circulation
As with any critically ill patient, airway patency is the first priority, and frequent reassessment is advised. After assurance that the airway is patent, high-flow oxygen is provided as required by mask or nasal cannula, commonly aiming for arterial oxygen saturations of 94% to 98%.[34]O'Driscoll BR, Howard LS, Earis J, et al. BTS guideline for oxygen use in adults in healthcare and emergency settings. Thorax. 2017 Jun;72(suppl 1):ii1-90.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28507176?tool=bestpractice.com
Routine supplementation of oxygen to achieve higher oxygen saturations has been linked to coronary and pulmonary arterial vasoconstriction in acute myocardial infarction.[68]McNulty PH, King N, Scott S, et al. Effects of supplemental oxygen administration on coronary blood flow in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005 Mar;288(3):H1057-62.
https://journals.physiology.org/doi/full/10.1152/ajpheart.00625.2004
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15706043?tool=bestpractice.com
[69]Rawles JM, Kenmure AC. Controlled trial of oxygen in uncomplicated myocardial infarction. Br Med J. 1976 May 8;1(6018):1121-3.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1639993
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/773507?tool=bestpractice.com
The goal is adequate oxygenation but not routine excessive oxygenation. The use of positive pressure ventilation or noninvasive ventilation (NIV) (continuous positive airway pressure and bilevel positive airway pressure) in shock resuscitation is controversial due to NIV-induced increase in intrathoracic pressure, which may decrease cardiac preload from the pulmonary circulation. NIV is well supported for hypoxemic respiratory failure.[70]Ferreyro BL, Angriman F, Munshi L, et al. Association of noninvasive oxygenation strategies with all-cause mortality in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure: a systematic feview and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2020 Jul 7;324(1):57-67.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7273316
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32496521?tool=bestpractice.com
However, the use of NIV in the setting of shock is not well supported in the literature, and has been clinically associated with worsening hypotension and perfusion. If NIV is used in patients with shock, rigorous monitoring of blood pressure and perfusion of vital organs must be maintained. For patients with sepsis-induced hypoxemic respiratory failure, high-flow nasal oxygen is recommended over NIV.[2]Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-247.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486643
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34599691?tool=bestpractice.com
Intravenous fluids aim to improve perfusion by increasing intravascular volume and preload. The benefit outweighs the risk in the majority of cases except frank pulmonary edema. If a ruptured aortic aneurysm is thought likely, systolic blood pressure should be maintained at no more than 100 mmHg systolic. Commonly, systolic blood pressure of 90 mmHg or a mean arterial pressure of 65 mmHg is targeted during volume resuscitation; infusion is stopped if concerns of volume overload develop (pulmonary rales or suspected pulmonary edema). If there is no evidence for, or suspicion of, pulmonary edema secondary to cardiac failure, early fluid delivery is more important than the type of fluid (crystalloid or colloid).[71]Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, et al; the SAFE study investigators. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2004 May 27;350(22):2247-56.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa040232#t=article
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15163774?tool=bestpractice.com
[72]Roberts I, Blackhall K, Alderson P, et al. Human albumin solution for resuscitation and volume expansion in critically ill patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;(11):CD001208.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD001208.pub4/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22071799?tool=bestpractice.com
[73]Lewis SR, Pritchard MW, Evans DJ, et al. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 3;(8):CD000567.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD000567.pub7/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30073665?tool=bestpractice.com
[
]
How do colloids compare with crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2307/fullShow me the answer[Evidence B]dcee690f-801f-4e69-9558-b7db51437fe3ccaBHow do colloids compare with crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people? There is some evidence that balanced crystalloids may be preferable to normal saline in critically ill patients in intensive care and are recommended in patients with sepsis or septic shock.[2]Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-247.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486643
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34599691?tool=bestpractice.com
[76]Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, et al. Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2018 Mar 1;378(9):829-39.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1711584?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29485925?tool=bestpractice.com
Fluids should be given via a large-bore peripheral intravascular catheter. If there is acute inferior (right coronary artery) occlusion, or right ventricular infarct, hypotension is initially (before thrombectomy) corrected with careful fluid administration to improve right ventricular filling and overall cardiac output.[77]Inohara T, Kohsaka S, Fukuda K, et al. The challenges in the management of right ventricular infarction. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2013 Sep;2(3):226-34.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3821821
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24222834?tool=bestpractice.com
Blood products should be administered in patients with acute blood loss (hemorrhage) or profound anemia from chronic red blood cell loss.[78]Association of Anaesthetists. AAGBI guidelines: the use of blood components and their alternatives 2016. April 2016 [internet publication].
https://associationofanaesthetists-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/anae.13489
Caution is needed in patients with suspected cardiogenic shock; intravenous fluids may be administered cautiously in the absence of signs of fluid overload (clinically determined by auscultation of the lungs to assess for rales, or by chest radiography).
Monitoring
Continuous monitoring is imperative to monitor response to therapy and to guide treatment. This includes clinical observation, repeated blood pressure readings, respiratory rate, oxygen saturations, pulse, level of consciousness, monitoring of urine output in relation to fluid resuscitation or use of vasoactive agents, and monitoring of cardiac rhythm. Direct blood pressure measurement via automatic cuff devices or an arterial line is preferred over routine sphygmomanometry, because direct blood pressure measurement is more precise and allows for continuous monitoring. If an arterial line is used, it also provides access for arterial blood sampling.[79]Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJ, et al. Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management: international consensus conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Apr;33(4):575-90.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17285286?tool=bestpractice.com
Lactate levels can be monitored to assess response to treatment. In the critical care setting, continuous capnography can aid the assessment of shock.[36]Nassar BS, Schmidt GA. Capnography during critical illness. Chest. 2016 Feb;149(2):576-85.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26447854?tool=bestpractice.com
Side stream or direct capnography (when endotracheal airway is in place) can be helpful in assessing pulmonary perfusion matched to ventilation.[36]Nassar BS, Schmidt GA. Capnography during critical illness. Chest. 2016 Feb;149(2):576-85.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26447854?tool=bestpractice.com
The lactate level will usually decrease if the patient is clinically improving.[2]Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-247.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486643
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34599691?tool=bestpractice.com
Treatment is dependent on continuous monitoring of these variables and guided by their response. Patients requiring vasoactive drugs (vasopressor/inotrope) need continuous monitoring in a critical care setting.
Vasoactive drugs
Patients with a systolic BP <90 mmHg with critical reduction in cardiac output and end-organ hypoperfusion are defined as being in cardiogenic shock.[4]Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):e263-421.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35379503?tool=bestpractice.com
Short-term intravenous infusion of a vasoactive agent (vasopressor and/or inotrope) should be considered in patients with hypotension (systolic BP <90mmHg) and/or signs or symptoms of hypoperfusion, despite adequate filling status.[3]McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-726.
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/36/3599/6358045
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447992?tool=bestpractice.com
[4]Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):e263-421.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35379503?tool=bestpractice.com
Vasoactive agents may cause tachycardia, and induce arrhythmias and myocardial ischemia.[3]McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-726.
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/36/3599/6358045
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447992?tool=bestpractice.com
[4]Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):e263-421.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35379503?tool=bestpractice.com
Intravenous inotropic support can increase cardiac output and improve hemodynamics in patients presenting with cardiogenic shock.[4]Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):e263-421.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35379503?tool=bestpractice.com
There is a lack of robust evidence to suggest the clear benefit of one inotropic agent over another in cardiogenic shock.[80]Kivikko M, Pollesello P, Tarvasmäki T, et al. Effect of baseline characteristics on mortality in the SURVIVE trial on the effect of levosimendan vs dobutamine in acute heart failure: Sub-analysis of the Finnish patients. Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jul 15;215:26-31.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.064
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27107540?tool=bestpractice.com
In general, the choice of a specific inotropic agent is guided by blood pressure, concurrent arrhythmias, and availability of drug.[4]Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):e263-421.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35379503?tool=bestpractice.com
Inotropes should be used with caution because there is evidence that they result in increased mortality.[3]McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-726.
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/36/3599/6358045
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447992?tool=bestpractice.com
[4]Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):e263-421.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35379503?tool=bestpractice.com
[81]Abraham WT, Adams KF, Fonarow GC, et al. In-hospital mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure requiring intravenous vasoactive medications: an analysis from the Acute Decompensated Heart Failure National Registry (ADHERE). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jul 5;46(1):57-64.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2005.03.051
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15992636?tool=bestpractice.com
Inotropes should be discontinued if there are sustained arrhythmias or symptomatic coronary ischemia. Continuous monitoring of cardiac rhythm is recommended during infusion of inotropes.
Vasopressors are commonly recommended in hypotension refractory to volume resuscitation. Vasopressors are recommended only after adequate volume resuscitation.[2]Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-247.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486643
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34599691?tool=bestpractice.com
[3]McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-726.
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/36/3599/6358045
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447992?tool=bestpractice.com
Therapeutic vasoconstriction aims at reversing the mismatch between vessel tone and intravascular volume. Dose is commonly titrated to achieve a mean arterial blood pressure of ≥65 mmHg, or a systolic blood pressure of ≥90 mmHg.[2]Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-247.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486643
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34599691?tool=bestpractice.com
[79]Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJ, et al. Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management: international consensus conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Apr;33(4):575-90.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17285286?tool=bestpractice.com
[82]Asfar P, Meziani F, Hamel JF, et al. High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 24;370(17):1583-93.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24635770?tool=bestpractice.com
Vasopressors increase the risk of tissue ischemia and necrosis in a dose-dependent manner.
Consult a specialist for guidance on suitable vasopressor/inotrope regimens. Selection of appropriate vasoactive agents should only take place under critical care supervision, and may vary according to the type of shock, clinician preference, and local practice guidelines.
Temporary mechanical circulatory support
Temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices (e.g., extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or intra-aortic balloon pump) should be considered in patients with persistent cardiogenic shock despite inotropic therapy.[3]McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-726.
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/36/3599/6358045
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447992?tool=bestpractice.com
[4]Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):e263-421.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35379503?tool=bestpractice.com
[83]Geller BJ, Sinha SS, Kapur NK, et al. Escalating and de-escalating temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022 Aug 9;146(6):e50-68.
https://www.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001076
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35862152?tool=bestpractice.com
Temporary MCS in appropriately selected candidates should be initiated as soon as possible with sufficient support to fully reverse the potential hemometabolic consequences of shock. If there is a delay to sufficient early support with temporary MCS, worsening end-organ perfusion and metabolic derangements can make future attempts difficult.[83]Geller BJ, Sinha SS, Kapur NK, et al. Escalating and de-escalating temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022 Aug 9;146(6):e50-68.
https://www.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001076
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35862152?tool=bestpractice.com
The hemodynamic benefits of the specific devices vary, and few head-to-head randomized comparisons exist. Vascular, bleeding, and neurologic complications are common to MCS devices, and the risk of such complications should generally be considered in the calculation to proceed with such support.[4]Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):e263-421.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35379503?tool=bestpractice.com
MCS requires specialist multidisciplinary expertise for implantation and management.[3]McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-726.
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/36/3599/6358045
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447992?tool=bestpractice.com
[83]Geller BJ, Sinha SS, Kapur NK, et al. Escalating and de-escalating temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022 Aug 9;146(6):e50-68.
https://www.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001076
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35862152?tool=bestpractice.com
The escalation of either pharmacologic and mechanical therapies should be considered in the context of multidisciplinary teams of heart failure and critical care specialists, interventional cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons.[4]Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 May 3;79(17):e263-421.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35379503?tool=bestpractice.com
[83]Geller BJ, Sinha SS, Kapur NK, et al. Escalating and de-escalating temporary mechanical circulatory support in cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2022 Aug 9;146(6):e50-68.
https://www.doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001076
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35862152?tool=bestpractice.com
Treatment of underlying cause
Volume resuscitation and vasoactive agents only buy time in most patients with shock. Successful reversal of shock requires treatment specifically aimed at the main cause of shock (e.g., cardiogenic shock, cardiac tamponade, pulmonary embolism, anaphylaxis, sepsis, hemorrhagic shock due to trauma, tension pneumothorax). The choice of specific treatment is guided by the individual results of continued and repeated patient evaluation.
Identification of cardiogenic shock is important because aggressive fluid administration may worsen the shock state and lead to the onset (or worsening) of acute pulmonary edema. Early involvement of specialist multidisciplinary teams (e.g., heart failure and critical care specialists, interventional cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons) is recommended when cardiogenic shock is suspected. Cardiogenic shock (secondary to a large myocardial infarction) needs urgent revascularization of the coronary arteries by percutaneous coronary intervention, direct coronary infusion of thrombolytics, or cardiovascular surgery.[50]van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, et al. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017 Oct 17;136(16):e232-68.
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/136/16/e232.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28923988?tool=bestpractice.com
[84]Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb JG, et al; SHOCK Investigators. Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2006 Jun 7;295(21):2511-5.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1782030
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16757723?tool=bestpractice.com
Mechanical support with an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) may also be indicated.[50]van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, et al. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017 Oct 17;136(16):e232-68.
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/136/16/e232.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28923988?tool=bestpractice.com
However, multiple IABP studies have not shown an improvement in mortality.[50]van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, et al. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017 Oct 17;136(16):e232-68.
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/136/16/e232.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28923988?tool=bestpractice.com
[85]Ahmad Y, Sen S, Shun-Shin MJ, et al. Intra-aortic balloon pump therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Jun;175(6):931-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25822657?tool=bestpractice.com
[86]Unverzagt S, Buerke M, de Waha A, et al. Intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP) for myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 27;(3):CD007398.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007398.pub3/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25812932?tool=bestpractice.com
[87]Zheng XY, Wang Y, Chen Y, et al. The effectiveness of intra-aortic balloon pump for myocardial infarction in patients with or without cardiogenic shock: a meta-analysis and systematic review. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Jul 8;16(1):148.
https://bmccardiovascdisord.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12872-016-0323-2
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27391391?tool=bestpractice.com
[
]
In people with myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock, what are the effects of intra-aortic balloon pump counterpulsation (IABP)?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.1071/fullShow me the answer
Severe rhythm disturbances should be corrected urgently in patients with acute heart failure and unstable conditions, using medical therapy, electrical cardioversion, or temporary pacing.[3]McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599-726.
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/36/3599/6358045
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34447992?tool=bestpractice.com
Cardiac tamponade needs urgent drainage by pericardiocentesis under ECG monitoring.[88]Adler Y, Charron P. The 2015 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of pericardial diseases. Eur Heart J. 2015 Nov 7;36(42):2873-4.
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/36/42/2873/2293452
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26547486?tool=bestpractice.com
This can have an effect by draining as little as 30 mL, but may be unsuccessful if the blood is clotted. A pericardial drain or surgical pericardial window may be required, with evaluation and treatment of the underlying cause of bleeding.
A pulmonary embolus may require thrombolysis, anticoagulation, and occasionally surgery if very large.
Anaphylactic shock requires administration of intramuscular epinephrine and supportive therapy.
Early recognition and treatment of septic shock is key to improving outcomes. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) treatment guidelines remain the most widely accepted standards.[2]Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-247.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486643
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34599691?tool=bestpractice.com
Current best practice is based on evidence for care bundles in sepsis.[2]Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-247.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486643
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34599691?tool=bestpractice.com
[89]Rhodes A, Phillips G, Beale R, et al. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign bundles and outcome: results from the International Multicentre Prevalence Study on Sepsis (the IMPreSS study). Intensive Care Med. 2015 Sep;41(9):1620-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26109396?tool=bestpractice.com
[90]Levy MM, Rhodes A, Phillips GS, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: association between performance metrics and outcomes in a 7.5-year study. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Nov;40(11):1623-33.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs00134-014-3496-0
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25270221?tool=bestpractice.com
[91]Seymour CW, Gesten F, Prescott HC, et al. Time to treatment and mortality during mandated emergency care for sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 8;376(23):2235-44.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5538258
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28528569?tool=bestpractice.com
The SSC guidelines recommend:
Administering antimicrobials immediately, ideally within 1 hour of recognition (in adults with possible septic shock or a high likelihood for sepsis)
Administering empiric antimicrobials with MRSA coverage in patients with sepsis or septic shock at high risk of MRSA
For adults with an initial diagnosis of sepsis or septic shock, and adequate source control where optimal duration of therapy is unclear, a combination of procalcitonin and clinical evaluation is recommended to decide when to discontinue antimicrobials.[2]Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-247.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486643
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34599691?tool=bestpractice.com
Resuscitation should be guided by dynamic measures rather than physical exam or static measures alone. Dynamic parameters include the response to a passive leg raise or a fluid bolus, using stroke volume, stroke volume variation, pulse pressure variation, or echocardiography, where available. In patients with septic shock and an ongoing requirement for vasopressor therapy, the SSC treatment guidelines suggest intravenous corticosteroids.[2]Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021 Nov;47(11):1181-247.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8486643
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34599691?tool=bestpractice.com
Hemorrhagic shock due to trauma requires a team approach with attention to identification of cause for, and control of, hemorrhage as soon as possible. Massive hemorrhage due to trauma is often associated with fibrinolysis, which further exacerbates hemorrhage by inhibiting clot formation. Antifibrinolytic agents may have a beneficial effect in addition to fluid and blood transfusion in stabilizing a trauma patient with shock.[92]Ker K, Roberts I, Shakur H, et al. Antifibrinolytic drugs for acute traumatic injury. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 9;(5):CD004896.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD004896.pub4/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25956410?tool=bestpractice.com
Overly aggressive fluid infusion may increase the bleeding rate in hemorrhagic shock: in particular, when MAPs are >40 mmHg.[79]Antonelli M, Levy M, Andrews PJ, et al. Hemodynamic monitoring in shock and implications for management: international consensus conference, Paris, France, 27-28 April 2006. Intensive Care Med. 2007 Apr;33(4):575-90.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17285286?tool=bestpractice.com
Tension pneumothorax requires urgent decompression through needle thoracocentesis.
Special considerations for suspected cardiogenic shock
Aggressive fluid administration in the setting of cardiogenic shock may worsen the shock state and lead to the onset (or worsening) of acute pulmonary edema. Intravenous fluids may be administered cautiously in the absence of signs of fluid overload (clinically determined by auscultation of the lungs to assess for rales, or by chest radiography) with small initial boluses [250mL] of crystalloid such as normal saline or Ringer lactate.[93]Vahdatpour C, Collins D, Goldberg S. Cardiogenic shock. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Apr 16;8(8):e011991.
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6507212
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30947630?tool=bestpractice.com
Ongoing management is guided by the continuous monitoring of organ perfusion and hemodynamics. Specialized treatments for afterload reduction with nitroglycerin and the inotrope dobutamine may be of benefit in the management of these patients.[94]Werdan K, Buerke M, Geppert A, et al. Infarction-related cardiogenic shock- diagnosis, monitoring and therapy–a German-Austrian S3 guideline. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2021 Feb 12;118(6):88-95.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8192735
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33827749?tool=bestpractice.com
Cardiogenic shock is classically considered a state of decreased cardiac index, increased systemic vascular resistance, and increased pulmonary artery pressure (often termed “wet cardiogenic shock” or with vascular volume overload); euvolemic cardiogenic shock presents with decreased cardiac index, increased systemic vascular resistance, and normal-range pulmonary artery pressure (“dry cardiogenic shock”). Afterload reduction is an important initial step in the management of both forms of cardiogenic shock.[50]van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, et al. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2017 Oct 17;136(16):e232-68.
http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/136/16/e232.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28923988?tool=bestpractice.com