Sublingual immunotherapy
Gradual oral exposure to native food proteins induces regulatory T cells early in treatment and results in immune deviation towards non-allergic Th1 responses later in therapy.[16]Sicherer SH, Sampson HA. Food allergy: recent advances in pathophysiology and treatment. Annu Rev Med. 2009 Feb;60:261-77.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18729729?tool=bestpractice.com
In one study, patients taking hazelnut sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) were able to increase the mean threshold dose eliciting a reaction, although 50% of the patients' symptoms were limited to oral allergy syndrome at enrolment.[85]Enrique E, Pineda F, Malek T, et al. Sublingual immunotherapy for hazelnut food allergy: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with a standardized hazelnut extract. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005 Nov;116(5):1073-9.
http://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(05)01912-3/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16275379?tool=bestpractice.com
A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of peanut SLIT showed that those receiving peanut SLIT were able to tolerate 20 times more peanut protein than the placebo group.[86]Kim EH, Bird JA, Kulis M, et al. Sublingual immunotherapy for peanut allergy: clinical and immunologic evidence of desensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar;127(3):640-6;e1.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3052379
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21281959?tool=bestpractice.com
A significant decrease in skin prick test wheal diameter, decreased basophil responsiveness, and significant changes in both peanut-specific immunoglobulin (Ig) E and IgG4 were detected in the treatment group compared with the placebo group. Studies investigating the utility of SLIT for other foods are ongoing, and its use is still considered investigational.
Oral immunotherapy
A food allergen is given in increasing amounts over a period of months to increase the triggering dose threshold for food-allergic patients. A number of oral immunotherapy (OIT) trials have focused on treatment of peanut allergy and have shown that the majority of children with peanut allergy can be desensitised using OIT. In one phase III trial, children and adolescents who were highly allergic to peanut were randomised to receive OIT with a peanut-derived OIT, or placebo. Children who received peanut-derived OIT were able to ingest higher doses of peanut protein without dose-limiting symptoms compared with the placebo group, and had lower symptom severity during peanut exposure at the exit food challenge.[87]PALISADE Group of Clinical Investigators., Vickery BP, Vereda A, et al. AR101 oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 22;379(21):1991-2001.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1812856?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30449234?tool=bestpractice.com
Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder is an OIT that is approved for use in patients, aged 4 to 17 years, with a confirmed diagnosis of peanut allergy. However, one systematic review and meta-analysis of OIT for peanut allergy showed that, despite effectively inducing desensitisation, peanut OIT regimes considerably increased allergic and anaphylactic reactions compared with avoidance or placebo.[88]Chu DK, Wood RA, French S, et al. Oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy (PACE): a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety. Lancet. 2019 Jun 1;393(10187):2222-32.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31030987?tool=bestpractice.com
It is important to note that most reactions experienced during OIT are mild and do not prevent participants from continuing on therapy; sustained immunological remission has not been convincingly proven when OIT is discontinued or continued at a reduced dose.[89]Anagnostou K, Islam S, King Y, et al. Assessing the efficacy of oral immunotherapy for the desensitisation of peanut allergy in children (STOP II): a phase 2 randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014 Apr 12;383(9925):1297-304.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24485709?tool=bestpractice.com
[90]Varshney P, Jones SM, Scurlock AM, et al. A randomized controlled study of peanut oral immunotherapy: clinical desensitization and modulation of the allergic response. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011 Mar;127(3):654-60.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3060783
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21377034?tool=bestpractice.com
[91]Chinthrajah RS, Purington N, Andorf S, et al. Sustained outcomes in oral immunotherapy for peanut allergy (POISED study): a large, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 study. Lancet. 2019 Oct 19;394(10207):1437-49.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31522849?tool=bestpractice.com
The latter is an important limitation of OIT since the majority of peanut-allergic individuals receiving OIT will need to ingest peanut indefinitely to maintain the protective benefit of OIT. Further research will focus on reducing adverse effects associated with therapy, and the development of surrogate biomarkers to better characterise allergic patients who will respond favourably to therapy, and those for whom other treatment options or strict allergen avoidance would be preferable. OIT to other foods, such as milk and egg, has also shown promise.[92]Calvani M, Giorgio V, Miceli Sopo S. Specific oral tolerance induction for food: a systematic review. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010 Feb;42(1):11-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20355360?tool=bestpractice.com
[93]Brożek JL, Terracciano L, Hsu J, et al. Oral immunotherapy for IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2012 Mar;42(3):363-74.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22356141?tool=bestpractice.com
[94]Romantsik O, Tosca MA, Zappettini S, et al. Oral and sublingual immunotherapy for egg allergy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 20;(4):CD010638.
http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD010638.pub3/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29676439?tool=bestpractice.com
[
]
What are the benefits and harms of oral immunotherapy for children and adolescents with egg allergy?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2155/fullShow me the answer For example, ADP101, an IgE-mediated multi-food oral immunotherapy, has been granted fast-track designation by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of single or multiple food allergies, including almonds, cashews, chicken egg, codfish, cow milk, hazelnut, peanut, pecan, pistachio, salmon, sesame seed, shrimp, soya, walnut, and wheat. One multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo phase I/II trial demonstrated that ADP101 has a dose-dependent, clinically meaningful desensitisation response for paediatric patients with some food allergies.[95]ClinicalTrials.gov. ADP101 for oral immunotherapy in food-allergic children and adults. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04856865. May 2023 [internet publication].
https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04856865
Chinese herbal medicine
The herbal compound (Food Allergy Herbal Formula-2 or FAHF-2) has been proven safe in adolescents and adults; however, the ability to improve tolerance to food allergens has not been demonstrated.[96]Wang J, Jones SM, Pongracic JA, et al. Safety, clinical, and immunologic efficacy of a Chinese herbal medicine (Food Allergy Herbal Formula-2) for food allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Oct;136(4):962-70;e1.
https://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(15)00634-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26044855?tool=bestpractice.com
Ongoing trials are investigating the potential of FAHF-2 to improve the safety of OIT when used in combination with multi-food OIT.[97]Clinical Trials.gov. E-B-FAHF-2, Multi OIT and Xolair (omalizumab) for food allergy. NCT02879006. Aug 2020 [internet publication].
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02879006
Omalizumab
Omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody, is approved by the FDA for IgE-mediated food allergy in children 1 year or older and adults for the reduction of allergic reactions (including anaphylaxis) due to accidental exposure to one or more foods. It should be used in conjunction with food allergen avoidance. Omalizumab has also been demonstrated to improve the safety of milk oral immunotherapy without affecting efficacy.[98]Wood RA, Kim JS, Lindblad R, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of omalizumab combined with oral immunotherapy for the treatment of cow's milk allergy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Apr;137(4):1103-10;e11.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5395304
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26581915?tool=bestpractice.com
An ongoing clinical trial is investigating the potential of omalizumab to increase the dose-triggering threshold for a number of food allergens in multi-food allergic individuals, and to improve the safety of multi-food OIT.[99]Clinical Trials.gov. Omalizumab as monotherapy and as adjunct therapy to multi-allergen OIT in food allergic participants (OUtMATCH). NCT03881696. Apr 2023 [internet publication].
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03881696
Epicutaneous immunotherapy
Epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) involves prolonged exposure to an allergen to the skin via an epicutaneous patch. One phase III trial reported a statistically significant response to EPIT (35.3% vs 13.6% in the placebo arm) peanut-allergic children aged 4 to 11 years.[100]Fleischer DM, Greenhawt M, Sussman G, et al. Effect of epicutaneous immunotherapy vs placebo on reaction to peanut protein ingestion among children with peanut allergy: the PEPITES randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019 Mar 12;321(10):946-55.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2725896
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30794314?tool=bestpractice.com
However, the prespecified lower bound of the confidence interval criterion for a positive result was not met.[100]Fleischer DM, Greenhawt M, Sussman G, et al. Effect of epicutaneous immunotherapy vs placebo on reaction to peanut protein ingestion among children with peanut allergy: the PEPITES randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019 Mar 12;321(10):946-55.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2725896
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30794314?tool=bestpractice.com
Ongoing trials are investigating the efficacy of milk EPIT in milk-allergic children and peanut EPIT in peanut-allergic children 1 to 3 years of age.[101]Clinical Trials.gov. Efficacy and safety of Viaskin Milk in children with IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy (MILES). NCT02223182. Feb 2021 [internet publication].
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02223182
[102]Clinical Trials.gov. Safety and efficacy study of Viaskin Peanut in peanut-allergic young children 1-3 years of age (EPITOPE). NCT03211247. Apr 2021 [internet publication].
https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03211247