There are multiple scoring systems and definitions for sepsis and sepsis with organ dysfunction. None is perfect and many seek to measure similar variables.
In February 2016, new definitions of sepsis and septic shock were published by the Third International Consensus group; the so-called ‘Sepsis-3’ definitions.[1]Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968574
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903338?tool=bestpractice.com
Sepsis was redefined by Sepsis-3 as “life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection”.[1]Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968574
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903338?tool=bestpractice.com
Organ dysfunction is defined as a change of 2 or more points in the Sequential (or Sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score.[1]Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968574
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903338?tool=bestpractice.com
[Figure caption and citation for the preceding image starts]: Sequential (or Sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) criteriaCreated by BMJ, adapted from Vincent JL, Moreno R, Takala J, et al. The SOFA (Sepsis-related Organ Failure Assessment) score to describe organ dysfunction/failure. On behalf of the Working Group on Sepsis-Related Problems of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med 1996;22:707-10. [Citation ends].
The shift away from the previous definitions (which described sepsis as a systemic inflammatory response syndrome [SIRS] arising due to a new infection) aimed to facilitate earlier diagnosis as well as greater consistency for research outcomes.[1]Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968574
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903338?tool=bestpractice.com
In the first international consensus definitions, which date from 1991, severe sepsis was defined as sepsis associated with organ dysfunction, hypoperfusion, or hypotension; septic shock was defined as sepsis with hypotension despite adequate fluid replacement.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Suspected sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management. Mar 2024 [internet publication].
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng51
However, the 2016 Third International Consensus Group (Sepsis-3) definitions state that the term 'severe sepsis' should be made redundant in light of the revisions to the definition of sepsis.[1]Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4968574
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26903338?tool=bestpractice.com
Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (APACHE II)[128]Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, et al. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985 Oct;13(10):818-29.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3928249?tool=bestpractice.com
The APACHE score is commonly used to establish illness severity in the intensive care unit (ICU) and predict the risk of death.
[
APACHE II scoring system
Opens in new window
]
There is a high risk of death if the score is ≥25.
Other sepsis risk-scoring models
Several other models have been developed for use in the ICU, including APACHE III, the Simplified Acute Physiology Score, and Mortality Probability Model II.[129]Shapiro NI, Wolfe RE, Moore RB, et al. Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis (MEDS) score: a prospectively derived and validated clinical prediction rule. Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3):670-5.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12626967?tool=bestpractice.com
[130]Knaus WA, Wagner DP, Draper EA, et al. The APACHE III prognostic system. Risk prediction of hospital mortality for critically ill hospitalized adults. Chest. 1991 Dec;100(6):1619-36.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1959406?tool=bestpractice.com
[131]Rivers EP, Nguyen, HB, Amponsah D. Sepsis: a landscape from the emergency department to the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2003 Mar;31(3):968-9.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12627013?tool=bestpractice.com
Patient group-specific scoring systems have also been developed. For example, the Predisposition Insult Response and Organ failure and Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis scores have been developed to risk stratify patients with sepsis or septic shock who are admitted to the accident and emergency department;[132]Macdonald SP, Arendts G, Fatovich DM, et al. Comparison of PIRO, SOFA, and MEDS scores for predicting mortality in emergency department patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;21(11):1257-63.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/acem.12515/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25377403?tool=bestpractice.com
the Sepsis in Obstetrics Score has been developed to risk stratify pregnant or postnatal women with sepsis.[72]Albright CM, Ali TN, Lopes V, et al. The sepsis in obstetrics score: a model to identify risk of morbidity from sepsis in pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jul;211(1):39;e1-8.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24613756?tool=bestpractice.com
These scoring systems can assist in the identification and management of sepsis in specific patient groups.[133]Vasquez DN, Das Neves AV, Vidal L, et al. Characteristics, outcomes, and predictability of critically ill obstetric patients: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep;43(9):1887-97.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26121075?tool=bestpractice.com
There are numerous ongoing studies investigating techniques for 'staging' the severity of sepsis using a variety of blood-borne markers.[134]Shehabi Y, Sterba M, Garrett PM, et al. Procalcitonin algorithm in critically ill adults with undifferentiated infection or suspected sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Nov 15;190(10):1102-10.
http://www.atsjournals.org/doi/full/10.1164/rccm.201408-1483OC#.V0JdkOQpqZM
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25295709?tool=bestpractice.com
[135]Warhurst G, Dunn G, Chadwick P, et al. Rapid detection of health-care-associated bloodstream infection in critical care using multipathogen real-time polymerase chain reaction technology: a diagnostic accuracy study and systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2015 May;19(35):1-142.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0082439
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25961752?tool=bestpractice.com
Although some techniques have shown initial promise, the evidence base remains weak, and they have an unclear role in future clinical practice.
Risk stratification
In any patient in whom sepsis is a possibility, use a systematic process to check vital observations and assess and record the risk of deterioration.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Suspected sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management. Mar 2024 [internet publication].
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng51
[41]NHS England. Sepsis guidance implementation advice for adults. Sep 2017 [internet publication].
https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/sepsis-guidance-implementation-advice-for-adults.pdf
[42]Royal College of Physicians. National early warning score (NEWS) 2: standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS. December 2017 [internet publication].
https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/national-early-warning-score-news-2
[43]Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;49(11):e1063-143.
https://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/Fulltext/2021/11000/Surviving_Sepsis_Campaign__International.21.aspx
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34605781?tool=bestpractice.com
Remember that no risk stratification process is 100% sensitive or 100% specific; therefore, you must use your clinical judgement.
Consult local guidelines for the recommended approach for assessing acute deterioration.
In hospital: use the National Early Warning Score 2 (NEWS2) or an alternative early warning score.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Suspected sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management. Mar 2024 [internet publication].
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng51
[41]NHS England. Sepsis guidance implementation advice for adults. Sep 2017 [internet publication].
https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/sepsis-guidance-implementation-advice-for-adults.pdf
[42]Royal College of Physicians. National early warning score (NEWS) 2: standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS. December 2017 [internet publication].
https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/national-early-warning-score-news-2
[44]NHS England. National early warning score (NEWS). 2019 [internet publication].
https://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/clinical-policy/sepsis/nationalearlywarningscore
NEWS2 is endorsed by NHS England and the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) for use in this setting.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Suspected sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management. Mar 2024 [internet publication].
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng51
[41]NHS England. Sepsis guidance implementation advice for adults. Sep 2017 [internet publication].
https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/sepsis-guidance-implementation-advice-for-adults.pdf
NICE recommends to use the NICE high-risk criteria for stratification of risk (rather than NEWS2) in an acute setting in patients who are or have recently been pregnant.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Suspected sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management. Mar 2024 [internet publication].
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng51
In the community and in custodial settings: use an early warning score such as NEWS2, which is recommended by NHS England and supported by the Royal College of General Practitioners in the UK.[41]NHS England. Sepsis guidance implementation advice for adults. Sep 2017 [internet publication].
https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/sepsis-guidance-implementation-advice-for-adults.pdf
[51]Royal College of General Practitioners. Sepsis: guidance for GPs. November 2018 [internet publication].
https://www.rcgp.org.uk/-/media/sepsis-guidance-for-GPs---FINAL.ashx?la=en
An alternative in the UK is to use the NICE high-risk criteria.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Suspected sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management. Mar 2024 [internet publication].
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng51
NEWS2 is the most widely used early warning score in the UK National Health Service and is endorsed by NHS England and NICE.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Suspected sepsis: recognition, diagnosis and early management. Mar 2024 [internet publication].
https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng51
[41]NHS England. Sepsis guidance implementation advice for adults. Sep 2017 [internet publication].
https://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/sepsis-guidance-implementation-advice-for-adults.pdf
NHS England: Sepsis
Opens in new window In a patient with a known or likely infection, a NEWS2 score of 5 or more is likely to indicate sepsis.[42]Royal College of Physicians. National early warning score (NEWS) 2: standardising the assessment of acute-illness severity in the NHS. December 2017 [internet publication].
https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/projects/outputs/national-early-warning-score-news-2
See Risk stratification under Diagnosis recommendations.