New-onset atrial fibrillation
- Overview
- Theory
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Follow up
- Resources
Treatment algorithm
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups: see disclaimer
Look out for this icon: for treatment options that are affected, or added, as a result of your patient's comorbidities.
haemodynamically unstable
emergency electrical cardioversion
Identify any patient with uncontrolled fast AF who has features of:[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
Acute or worsening haemodynamic instability[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Syncope, owing to global reduction in blood flow to the brain
Acute pulmonary oedema
Ongoing myocardial ischaemia; typical ischaemic chest pain and/or evidence of myocardial ischaemia on 12-lead ECG
Symptomatic hypotension; systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg
Cardiogenic shock; see Shock
Heart failure
Pulmonary oedema and/or raised jugular venous pressure
Evidence of ventricular pre-excitation on ECG with rapid antegrade conduction, as seen in people with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
Patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome and AF are at risk of fast ventricular rates resulting from rapid conduction of atrial electrical activity to the ventricles via the accessory pathway, and at increased risk of ventricular fibrillation and sudden death[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Do not delay emergency synchronised direct current (DC) cardioversion in these groups, regardless of the duration of onset of the patient’s arrhythmia, as their condition may be life-threatening.
Electrical cardioversion quickly and effectively converts AF to sinus rhythm.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Electrical cardioversion restores sinus rhythm quicker and more effectively than pharmacological cardioversion and is associated with shorter hospital stays.[66]Crijns HJ, Weijs B, Fairley AM, et al. Contemporary real life cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: results from the multinational RHYTHM-AF study. Int J Cardiol. 2014 Apr 1;172(3):588-94. https://www.internationaljournalofcardiology.com/article/S0167-5273(14)00310-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24556445?tool=bestpractice.com
Do not use pharmacological cardioversion in haemodynamically compromised patients.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Urgently admit to an acute medical unit.[32]Bradley A, Sheridan P. Atrial fibrillation. BMJ. 2013 Jun 17;346:f3719. https://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f3719 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23775800?tool=bestpractice.com
Call for anaesthetic support to sedate the patient before DC cardioversion.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
This will usually be with a short-acting general anaesthetic.
Seek senior and/or specialist review; this should not delay urgent DC cardioversion.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 Further treatment after emergency electrical cardioversion should only be initiated by a specialist.
Check the patient’s oral anticoagulation status as soon as possible.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com In patients not already on therapeutic anticoagulation, immediately start anticoagulation pre-cardioversion. See Pre-cardioversion anticoagulation below. This is important to prevent potential thromboembolic complications and should be given in a timely manner even in haemodynamically unstable patients.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Record and store an ECG rhythm strip during and immediately after shock delivery.
Continuously monitor the patient’s blood pressure and oximetry during the procedure.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [67]Furniss SS, Sneyd JR. Safe sedation in modern cardiological practice. Heart. 2015 Oct;101(19):1526-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26085525?tool=bestpractice.com
Practical tip
Ensure the defibrillator is synchronised and that it remains synchronised between shocks.
If initial attempts at DC cardioversion fail, ensure there is good skin-to-electrode contact with the pads in the anteroposterior position.
In patients with AF duration of more than 24 hours who are undergoing cardioversion, initiate oral anticoagulation for at least 4 weeks after cardioversion.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com Use a direct oral anticoagulant in preference to a vitamin K antagonist.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
This is an optional step for those with AF onset definitely less than 24 hours.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Beyond 4 weeks, base decisions about long-term anticoagulation on associated stroke risk factors, as per the patient’s CHA 2DS 2-VASc score .[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [34]Borre ED, Goode A, Raitz G, et al. Predicting thromboembolic and bleeding event risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Thromb Haemost. 2018 Dec;118(12):2171-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754740 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376678?tool=bestpractice.com [ Atrial Fibrillation CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Score for Stroke Risk Opens in new window ] See Longer-term anticoagulation strategy below.
Be aware that some patients may develop sinus bradycardia after successful DC cardioversion. Ensure there are provisions for the use of intravenous atropine or isoprenaline or temporary transcutaneous pacing to manage post-cardioversion bradycardia until the patient stabilises.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
pre-cardioversion anticoagulation
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Check the patient’s oral anticoagulation status as soon as possible.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com In patients not already on therapeutic anticoagulation, immediately start anticoagulation pre-cardioversion. Use a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), such as enoxaparin, or unfractionated heparin.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
This is important to prevent potential thromboembolic complications and should be given in a timely manner even in haemodynamically unstable patients.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
After cardioversion, transition patients who are started on a LMWH or unfractionated heparin to a DOAC, such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, or dabigatran, or warfarin when appropriate.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com See Longer-term anticoagulation strategy below.
Primary options
heparin: consult specialist for guidance on dose
OR
enoxaparin: consult specialist for guidance on dose
These drug options and doses relate to a patient with no comorbidities.
Primary options
heparin: consult specialist for guidance on dose
OR
enoxaparin: consult specialist for guidance on dose
Drug choice, dose and interactions may be affected by the patient's comorbidities. Check your local drug formulary.
Show drug information for a patient with no comorbidities
Primary options
heparin
OR
enoxaparin
treat underlying cause
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Identify and manage risk factors and concomitant conditions.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com Correct, where possible, treatable causes of AF or refer, as appropriate.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [32]Bradley A, Sheridan P. Atrial fibrillation. BMJ. 2013 Jun 17;346:f3719. https://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f3719 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23775800?tool=bestpractice.com Use local policies and guidelines alongside your clinical judgement to determine urgency.
In practice, refer to a cardiologist, any patient:
Who is young and has suspected underlying structural heart disease
With a pre-excitation syndrome such as Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.[53]Blomström-Lundqvist C, Scheinman MM, Aliot EM, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias: executive summary. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Oct 15;42(8):1493-531. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109703011410?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14563598?tool=bestpractice.com See Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
With valvular heart disease associated with AF
With suspected heart failure.
Practical tip
Signs of stroke or heart failure may be subtle in some instances.
Bear in mind that rhythm control is often unsuccessful in critically ill patients and those with severely impaired ventricular systolic function, because AF is often precipitated/exacerbated by increased sympathetic tone, inotropes, and vasopressors.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com In these patients, work to identify and correct precipitating factors and secondary causes and optimise background treatment.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
amiodarone
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Consider intravenous amiodarone for acute control of heart rate in these patients.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com Only do this with advice from a specialist.
Do not use rate control drugs in people with AF with a pre-excitation syndrome such as Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com In practice, seek advice from a specialist or senior colleague to determine suitable alternatives. See Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.
These drugs accelerate conduction down the accessory pathway to the ventricle putting the patient at risk of life-threatening arrhythmias, such as ventricular fibrillation and sudden death.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
AF is the second most common arrhythmia in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, occurring in approximately one third of patients.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Atrial activity predominantly conducts down the accessory pathway, causing ventricular pre-excitation.
The ECG will show a fast, broad QRS irregular rhythm with delta waves.
Primary options
amiodarone: 5 mg/kg intravenously over 20-120 minutes initially, repeat infusion according to response, maximum 1200 mg/day
More amiodaroneThe European Society of Cardiology recommends 300 mg intravenously over 30-60 minutes initially, followed by 900-1200 mg intravenously over 24 hours.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
These drug options and doses relate to a patient with no comorbidities.
Primary options
amiodarone: 5 mg/kg intravenously over 20-120 minutes initially, repeat infusion according to response, maximum 1200 mg/day
More amiodaroneThe European Society of Cardiology recommends 300 mg intravenously over 30-60 minutes initially, followed by 900-1200 mg intravenously over 24 hours.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Drug choice, dose and interactions may be affected by the patient's comorbidities. Check your local drug formulary.
Show drug information for a patient with no comorbidities
Primary options
amiodarone
longer-term anticoagulation strategy
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
After cardioversion, continue anticoagulation. If the patient has been started on parenteral anticoagulation before cardioversion, transition them to an appropriate oral anticoagulant.
Use the CHA 2DS 2-VASc score to calculate stroke risk in all patients presenting with AF.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [ Atrial Fibrillation CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Score for Stroke Risk Opens in new window ]
Consider oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in men with a CHA 2DS 2-VASc score of 1 or more and women with a score of 2 or more.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 In these groups, continue anticoagulation long-term.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) give an additional, stronger recommendation for higher CHA 2DS 2-VASc scores; the ESC recommends commencing oral anticoagulation in AF patients with a CHA 2DS 2-VASc score of 2 or more in men and 3 or more in women.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
If you are considering anticoagulation, use the ORBIT score or the HAS-BLED score to:[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [34]Borre ED, Goode A, Raitz G, et al. Predicting thromboembolic and bleeding event risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Thromb Haemost. 2018 Dec;118(12):2171-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754740 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376678?tool=bestpractice.com [36]Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, et al. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest. 2010 Nov;138(5):1093-100. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20299623?tool=bestpractice.com [ ORBIT Bleeding Risk Score Opens in new window ] [ HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk Score Opens in new window ]
Assess the risk of a major bleed
Identify (and subsequently manage) modifiable risk factors for bleeding, such as uncontrolled hypertension, harmful alcohol consumption, labile international normalised ratio (INR; if the patient is on warfarin), concurrent use of medication (including antiplatelets, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), and reversible causes of anaemia
Flag the ‘high bleeding risk’ patients for early (4 weeks as opposed to 4-6 months) review and follow-up.
Guidelines from the ESC recommend use of the HAS-BLED score.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends use of the ORBIT score where possible, but either HAS-BLED or ORBIT is acceptable.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
Do not use bleeding risk scores to exclude anticoagulant treatment; a high score should not rule out anticoagulation.[64]Rohla M, Weiss TW, Pecen L, et al. Risk factors for thromboembolic and bleeding events in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: the prospective, multicentre observational PREvention oF thromboembolic events – European Registry in Atrial Fibrillation (PREFER in AF). BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 30;9(3):e022478. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/3/e022478.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30928922?tool=bestpractice.com
Bleeding risk is dynamic and requires regular re-assessment; it should not be based on a single one-off assessment.[65]Chao TF, Lip GYH, Lin YJ, et al. Incident risk factors and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulants: a comparison of baseline, follow-up and delta HAS-BLED scores with an approach focused on modifiable bleeding risk factors. Thromb Haemost. 2018 Apr;118(4):768-77. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29510426?tool=bestpractice.com
Practical tip
A history of falls is not an independent predictor of bleeding on oral anticoagulants. A modelling study estimated that a patient would need to fall 295 times per year for the benefits of ischaemic stroke reduction with oral anticoagulants to be outweighed by the potential for serious bleeding.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Practical tip
Follow your local protocol when choosing a bleeding risk score. 2020 guidelines from the ESC recommend use of the HAS-BLED score.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com NICE recommends preferential use of the ORBIT score in its 2021 guideline.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 However, subsequently published data show no advantage of ORBIT over HAS-BLED, even in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants, and suggest that in some circumstances ORBIT performs worse.[68]Proietti M, Romiti GF, Vitolo M, et al. Comparison of HAS-BLED and ORBIT bleeding risk scores in atrial fibrillation patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: a report from the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 Oct 26;8(7):778-86. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34555148?tool=bestpractice.com [69]Wattanaruengchai P, Nathisuwan S, Karaketklang K, et al. Comparison of the HAS-BLED versus ORBIT scores in predicting major bleeding among Asians receiving direct-acting oral anticoagulants. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 May;88(5):2203-12. https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.15145 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34783372?tool=bestpractice.com [70]Esteve-Pastor MA, Rivera-Caravaca JM, Roldán V, et al. Predicting performance of the HAS-BLED and ORBIT bleeding risk scores in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban: observations from the prospective EMIR Registry. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022 Dec 15;9(1):38-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36318457?tool=bestpractice.com The use of either score is reasonable, and the choice of bleeding risk score is less important than failure to consider anticoagulation at all.
When indicated by the CHA 2DS 2-VASc score, start oral anticoagulation as soon as possible.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Use a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in preference to a vitamin K antagonist.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
Discuss the options for anticoagulation with the patient and base the choice on their clinical features and preferences.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
Before starting anticoagulation treatment, specifically discuss the potential risks and benefits with the patient, as part of the shared decision-making process, explaining that:[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
For most people the benefit of anticoagulation outweighs the bleeding risk
For people with an increased risk of bleeding the benefit of anticoagulation may not always outweigh the bleeding risk, and careful monitoring of bleeding risk is important.
If using a DOAC, choose one of apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com The choice of DOAC should be tailored to the person's clinical needs and preferences.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
DOACs have non-inferior efficacy and are possibly safer, particularly in terms of major bleeding, compared with warfarin.[71]Bruins Slot KM, Berge E. Factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists for preventing cerebral or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 6;3:CD008980. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008980.pub3 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29509959?tool=bestpractice.com [
] How do factor Xa inhibitors compare with warfarin for prevention of cerebral and systemic embolism in people with atrial fibrillation (AF)?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2101/fullShow me the answer[Evidence A]f36ae59f-7547-4cd9-b163-1962afa4027cccaAHow do factor Xa inhibitors compare with warfarin for prevention of cerebral and systemic embolism in people with atrial fibrillation (AF)? Unlike warfarin, DOACs don’t require laboratory anticoagulation monitoring.[72]Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2014 Mar 15;383(9921):955-62. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24315724?tool=bestpractice.com [73]Lip G, Freedman B, De Caterina R, et al. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: past, present and future – comparing the guidelines and practical decision-making. Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jun 28;117(7):1230-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28597905?tool=bestpractice.com
If using warfarin, start the patient on a parenteral anticoagulant (if they aren’t on one already as part of the pre-cardioversion anticoagulation), such as unfractionated heparin or a low molecular weight heparin, at the same time. Ensure INR is in the range of 2.0 to 3.0 before ceasing the parenteral anticoagulant.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [32]Bradley A, Sheridan P. Atrial fibrillation. BMJ. 2013 Jun 17;346:f3719. https://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f3719 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23775800?tool=bestpractice.com Ensure follow-up to maintain the patient’s time in therapeutic range (TTR) >65%.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 This approach is in line with recommendations from NICE and reflects common practice in the UK. Bear in mind, however, that guidelines from the ESC recommend maintaining TTR >70%.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Do not offer aspirin monotherapy solely for stroke prevention to people with AF.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
A specialist may consider non-drug options in the presence of absolute contraindications to oral anticoagulants, including:[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Active serious bleeding (where the source should be identified and treated)
Associated comorbidities (e.g., severe thrombocytopenia <50 platelets/microlitre, severe anaemia under investigation, etc.)
A recent high-risk bleeding event such as intracranial haemorrhage.
Primary options
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
More apixabanPatients with at least two of the following characteristics should receive the lower dose: ≥80 years of age; body weight <61kg; or serum creatinine ≥133 micromol/L (1.5 mg/dL).
OR
edoxaban: body weight <61 kg: 30 mg orally once daily; body weight ≥61 kg: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
dabigatran: 18-74 years of age: 150 mg orally twice daily; 75-79 years of age: 110-150 mg orally twice daily; ≥80 years of age: 110 mg orally twice daily
More dabigatranPatients on concomitant verapamil or amiodarone should receive the lower dose.
Secondary options
warfarin: 5-10 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. Warfarin dosing Opens in new window
These drug options and doses relate to a patient with no comorbidities.
Primary options
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
More apixabanPatients with at least two of the following characteristics should receive the lower dose: ≥80 years of age; body weight <61kg; or serum creatinine ≥133 micromol/L (1.5 mg/dL).
OR
edoxaban: body weight <61 kg: 30 mg orally once daily; body weight ≥61 kg: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
dabigatran: 18-74 years of age: 150 mg orally twice daily; 75-79 years of age: 110-150 mg orally twice daily; ≥80 years of age: 110 mg orally twice daily
More dabigatranPatients on concomitant verapamil or amiodarone should receive the lower dose.
Secondary options
warfarin: 5-10 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. Warfarin dosing Opens in new window
Drug choice, dose and interactions may be affected by the patient's comorbidities. Check your local drug formulary.
Show drug information for a patient with no comorbidities
Primary options
apixaban
OR
edoxaban
OR
rivaroxaban
OR
dabigatran
Secondary options
warfarin
haemodynamically stable: onset <48 hours
rate control
Use rate control to slow the patient’s heart rate in the presence of tachycardia.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Lafuente-Lafuente C, Mahé I, Extramiana F. Management of atrial fibrillation. BMJ. 2009 Dec 23;339:b5216. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20032065?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 In practice, do this while initially assessing the patient.
Rate control is often sufficient to improve AF-related symptoms.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Bear in mind that there is very little in the way of robust evidence to inform the best type and intensity of rate control treatment.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Use atrioventricular nodal blocking drugs – either a standard beta-blocker (that is, a beta-blocker other than sotalol) such as bisoprolol, metoprolol, esmolol, or carvedilol, or a rate-limiting non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker (diltiazem or verapamil) – as initial monotherapy.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 Base the choice of drug on the person's symptoms, heart rate, comorbidities, and preferences when considering drug treatment.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
These are preferred first-line options as they have rapid onset of action and are effective for high sympathetic tone.[74]Segal JB, McNamara RL, Miller MR, et al. The evidence regarding the drugs used for ventricular rate control. J Fam Pract. 2000 Jan;49(1):47-59. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10678340?tool=bestpractice.com [75]Schreck DM, Rivera AR, Tricarico VJ. Emergency management of atrial fibrillation and flutter: intravenous diltiazem versus intravenous digoxin. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Jan;29(1):135-40. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8998092?tool=bestpractice.com [76]Siu CW, Lau CP, Lee WL, et al. Intravenous diltiazem is superior to intravenous amiodarone or digoxin for achieving ventricular rate control in patients with acute uncomplicated atrial fibrillation. Crit Care Med. 2009 Jul;37(7):2174-80. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19487941?tool=bestpractice.com [77]Tisdale JE, Padhi ID, Goldberg AD, et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous diltiazem and digoxin for atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Am Heart J. 1998 May;135(5 Pt 1):739-47. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9588402?tool=bestpractice.com [78]Scheuermeyer FX, Grafstein E, Stenstrom R, et al. Safety and efficiency of calcium channel blockers versus beta-blockers for rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation and no acute underlying medical illness. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Mar;20(3):222-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23517253?tool=bestpractice.com
Bear in mind that rate-limiting calcium-channel blockers are contraindicated in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (a common comorbidity).
Alternative drugs are available. Seek advice from a specialist on the best option for your individual patient.
Consider digoxin monotherapy if the patient is sedentary (they do no or very little physical exercise) or if other rate-limiting drugs are not appropriate because of comorbidities or patient preferences.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 In practice, this is also a good option for older patients.
If monotherapy does not control symptoms, and if continuing symptoms are thought to be due to poor ventricular rate control, consider combination therapy with any two of the following:[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
A beta-blocker
Diltiazem
Bear in mind that this is contraindicated in people with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com See Acute heart failure
Digoxin.
Do not offer amiodarone for rate control in these patients. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends against use of long-term amiodarone (longer than 12 months) due to lack of evidence and the risk of serious side effects.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 You should only consider amiodarone for rate control in critically ill patients and those with severely impaired ventricular systolic function under the advice of a specialist.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Practical tip
In stable patients, oral therapy is reasonable. If the patient is stable but you wish to achieve more rapid rate control, intravenous administration is a better choice than oral. Intravenous administration is also useful for observation of acute adverse effects (as infusion can be discontinued promptly) and therefore appropriate dose titration.
Do not use rate control drugs in people with AF with a pre-excitation syndrome such as Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com In practice, seek advice from a specialist or senior colleague to determine suitable alternatives. See Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.
These drugs accelerate conduction down the accessory pathway to the ventricle putting the patient at risk of life-threatening arrhythmias, such as ventricular fibrillation and sudden death.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
bisoprolol: 1.25 mg orally once daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 20 mg/day
OR
metoprolol: 2.5 to 5 mg intravenously initially (at a rate of 1-2 mg/minute), may repeat every 5 minutes if required, maximum 10-15 mg/total dose; 50 mg orally (immediate-release) two to three times daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 300 mg/day
More metoprololThe European Society of Cardiology recommends a maximum intravenous dose of 20 mg/total dose, and an oral (immediate-release) dose of 25-100 mg twice daily.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
OR
esmolol: 500 micrograms/kg/minute intravenous infusion for 1 minute as a loading dose, followed by 50 micrograms/kg/minute infusion for 4 minutes, consult specialist for guidance as further dose titration depends on response; usual maintenance dose 50-200 micrograms/kg/minute
More esmololThe European Society of Cardiology recommends a maximum dose of 300 micrograms/kg/minute.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
OR
carvedilol: 3.125 mg orally twice daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 50 mg/day (body weight <85 kg) or 100 mg/day (body weight >85 kg)
OR
verapamil: 5-10 mg intravenously over 2 minutes, may repeat after 5-10 minutes if required; 40-120 mg orally (immediate-release) three times daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 480 mg
More verapamilThe European Society of Cardiology recommends a dose of 2.5 to 10 mg intravenously over 5 minutes. An extended-release oral formulation may be used if available.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
OR
diltiazem: 60 mg orally (immediate-release) three times daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 360 mg
More diltiazemThe European Society of Cardiology recommends intravenous diltiazem as a treatment option; however, this formulation is not available in the UK. An extended-release oral formulation may be used if available.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Secondary options
digoxin: 0.75 to 1.5 mg orally given in divided doses over 24 hours for rapid digitalisation, followed by maintenance dose of 0.125 to 0.25 mg/day
These drug options and doses relate to a patient with no comorbidities.
Primary options
bisoprolol: 1.25 mg orally once daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 20 mg/day
OR
metoprolol: 2.5 to 5 mg intravenously initially (at a rate of 1-2 mg/minute), may repeat every 5 minutes if required, maximum 10-15 mg/total dose; 50 mg orally (immediate-release) two to three times daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 300 mg/day
More metoprololThe European Society of Cardiology recommends a maximum intravenous dose of 20 mg/total dose, and an oral (immediate-release) dose of 25-100 mg twice daily.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
OR
esmolol: 500 micrograms/kg/minute intravenous infusion for 1 minute as a loading dose, followed by 50 micrograms/kg/minute infusion for 4 minutes, consult specialist for guidance as further dose titration depends on response; usual maintenance dose 50-200 micrograms/kg/minute
More esmololThe European Society of Cardiology recommends a maximum dose of 300 micrograms/kg/minute.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
OR
carvedilol: 3.125 mg orally twice daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 50 mg/day (body weight <85 kg) or 100 mg/day (body weight >85 kg)
OR
verapamil: 5-10 mg intravenously over 2 minutes, may repeat after 5-10 minutes if required; 40-120 mg orally (immediate-release) three times daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 480 mg
More verapamilThe European Society of Cardiology recommends a dose of 2.5 to 10 mg intravenously over 5 minutes. An extended-release oral formulation may be used if available.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
OR
diltiazem: 60 mg orally (immediate-release) three times daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 360 mg
More diltiazemThe European Society of Cardiology recommends intravenous diltiazem as a treatment option; however, this formulation is not available in the UK. An extended-release oral formulation may be used if available.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Secondary options
digoxin: 0.75 to 1.5 mg orally given in divided doses over 24 hours for rapid digitalisation, followed by maintenance dose of 0.125 to 0.25 mg/day
Drug choice, dose and interactions may be affected by the patient's comorbidities. Check your local drug formulary.
Show drug information for a patient with no comorbidities
Primary options
bisoprolol
OR
metoprolol
OR
esmolol
OR
carvedilol
OR
verapamil
OR
diltiazem
Secondary options
digoxin
consider early rhythm control
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Check the patient’s oral anticoagulation status.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
If the patient is not on anticoagulation, assess bleeding risk using the ORBIT score or the HAS-BLED score and then start anticoagulation pre-cardioversion as soon as possible.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [ ORBIT Bleeding Risk Score Opens in new window ] [ HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk Score Opens in new window ] See Pre-cardioversion anticoagulation below.
Beyond 4 weeks, base decisions about long-term anticoagulation on associated stroke risk factors, as per the patient’s CHA 2DS 2-VASc score .[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [34]Borre ED, Goode A, Raitz G, et al. Predicting thromboembolic and bleeding event risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Thromb Haemost. 2018 Dec;118(12):2171-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754740 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376678?tool=bestpractice.com [ Atrial Fibrillation CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Score for Stroke Risk Opens in new window ] See Longer-term anticoagulation strategy below.
Choose early or delayed cardioversion.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
In patients with AF duration 24 to 48 hours who are undergoing cardioversion, initiate oral anticoagulation for at least 4 weeks after cardioversion.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com Use a direct oral anticoagulant in preference to a vitamin K antagonist.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
This is an optional step for those with AF onset definitely less than 24 hours.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Practical tip
In patients with onset of the arrhythmia definitely less than 48 hours, use early rhythm control rather than delayed rhythm control or rate control alone if it is feasible within the treatment setting and appropriate to patient characteristics, clinical presentation, and preferences. This may result in earlier symptom relief for the patient.
Consider either pharmacological or electrical cardioversion depending on clinical circumstances, patient preferences, and resources, to reduce symptoms.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
Electrical cardioversion restores sinus rhythm quicker and more effectively than pharmacological cardioversion and is associated with shorter hospital stays.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [66]Crijns HJ, Weijs B, Fairley AM, et al. Contemporary real life cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: results from the multinational RHYTHM-AF study. Int J Cardiol. 2014 Apr 1;172(3):588-94. https://www.internationaljournalofcardiology.com/article/S0167-5273(14)00310-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24556445?tool=bestpractice.com Pharmacological cardioversion, however, does not require fasting or sedation.
Electrical cardioversion is achieved with synchronised direct current (DC) cardioversion. Pharmacological cardioversion uses an anti-arrhythmic drug, selected according to the patient’s history and condition.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
In haemodynamically stable patients, the decision to use electrical or pharmacological cardioversion will depend on local expertise, facilities and drugs available, the availability of a suitable clinician to administer sedation if electric cardioversion is selected, and patient preference.
Electrical cardioversion
Seek anaesthetic support to sedate the patient before DC cardioversion.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Intravenous sedation should not be administered in the fed state as this increases the risk of aspiration. The anaesthetist will also be able to advise how long the patient should be fasting for safe sedation.
Record and store an ECG rhythm strip during and immediately after shock delivery.
Continuously monitor the patient’s blood pressure and oximetry during the procedure.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [67]Furniss SS, Sneyd JR. Safe sedation in modern cardiological practice. Heart. 2015 Oct;101(19):1526-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26085525?tool=bestpractice.com
Bear in mind that some patients may develop sinus bradycardia after successful DC cardioversion. Ensure there are provisions for the use of intravenous atropine or isoprenaline or temporary transcutaneous pacing to manage post-cardioversion bradycardia until the patient stabilises.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Practical tip
Ensure the defibrillator is synchronised and that it remains synchronised between shocks.
If initial attempts at DC cardioversion fail, ensure there is good skin-to-electrode contact with the pads in the anteroposterior position.
Pharmacological cardioversion
Bear in mind that pharmacological cardioversion requires continuous medical supervision and ECG monitoring, regardless of the drug used, to detect a pro-arrhythmic event.[79]Camm AJ, Lüscher TF, Maurer G, et al, eds. The ESC textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press/European Society of Cardiology; 2018.
In practice, this will usually be undertaken in a cardiac monitoring bed (e.g., in the cardiac care unit or a resuscitation bed in the accident and emergency department).
Use an anti-arrhythmic drug, selected according to the patient’s history and the overall clinical picture.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence in the UK recommends offering:[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
A choice of flecainide or amiodarone to people with no evidence of structural or ischaemic heart disease
or
Amiodarone to people with evidence of structural heart disease
You will need a large-bore cannula for amiodarone.
Other anti-arrhythmics used outside of the UK include:[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Vernakalant – although available in the UK, it is rarely used
Ibutilide – not available in the UK.
Seek specialist opinion from a cardiologist if you are unsure about which drug to use.
Do not use sotalol.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
If using a class 1C anti-arrhythmic (e.g., flecainide), co-prescribe an atrioventricular (AV) nodal blocking agent (e.g., rate-limiting calcium-channel blocker or beta-blocker) if the patient is not already taking an AV nodal blocking agent. This is to prevent accelerated ventricular responses.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Using a sodium-channel blocker such as flecainide without an AV nodal blocking agent can convert to a slower atrial flutter rhythm, which allows the AV node to conduct in a 1:1 fashion and paradoxically results in faster ventricular response.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Although this can occur in the acute situation of pharmacological cardioversion it is more important when considering these drugs for longer-term management to prevent recurrent AF.
Bear in mind that flecainide can only be used in the absence of structural heart disease/past ischaemic heart disease.
If in doubt, seek specialist cardiology advice.
Primary options
flecainide: 200-300 mg orally as a single dose
More flecainideThe European Society of Cardiology recommends intravenous flecainide as a treatment option at a dose of 2 mg/kg intravenously over 10 minutes; however, this formulation is not available in the UK.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
OR
amiodarone: 5-7 mg/kg intravenously over 1-2 hours, followed by 50 mg/hour intravenous infusion, maximum 1200 mg/day
These drug options and doses relate to a patient with no comorbidities.
Primary options
flecainide: 200-300 mg orally as a single dose
More flecainideThe European Society of Cardiology recommends intravenous flecainide as a treatment option at a dose of 2 mg/kg intravenously over 10 minutes; however, this formulation is not available in the UK.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
OR
amiodarone: 5-7 mg/kg intravenously over 1-2 hours, followed by 50 mg/hour intravenous infusion, maximum 1200 mg/day
Drug choice, dose and interactions may be affected by the patient's comorbidities. Check your local drug formulary.
Show drug information for a patient with no comorbidities
Primary options
flecainide
OR
amiodarone
pre-cardioversion anticoagulation
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Check the patient’s oral anticoagulation status.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
If the patient is already on therapeutic anticoagulation:
Check international normalised ratio (INR), if possible, in patients already taking warfarin before electrical cardioversion to confirm good anticoagulant adherence, with the INR within therapeutic range for 3 weeks prior to cardioversion. In patients already taking a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), confirm they have been on an appropriate dose with good adherence to treatment for 3 weeks before cardioversion
Proceed with cardioversion (either immediate or delayed for possible spontaneous cardioversion).[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
If the patient is not on anticoagulation, assess bleeding risk using the ORBIT score or the HAS-BLED score and then start anticoagulation pre-cardioversion as soon as possible.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [ ORBIT Bleeding Risk Score Opens in new window ] [ HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk Score Opens in new window ]
Guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommend use of the HAS-BLED score.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends use of ORBIT over HAS-BLED where possible.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 In practice, either HAS-BLED or ORBIT is acceptable.
Choose an appropriate anticoagulant for the patient in line with your hospital protocols.
Guidelines from the ESC recommend using a DOAC such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, or dabigatran; or a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), such as enoxaparin; or unfractionated heparin.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Guidelines from NICE recommend using a LMWH or unfractionated heparin at initial presentation in this group.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
Transition patients who are started on a LMWH or unfractionated heparin to a DOAC, such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, or dabigatran, or warfarin, when appropriate.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com See Longer-term anticoagulation strategy below.
Primary options
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
More apixabanPatients with at least two of the following characteristics should receive the lower dose: ≥80 years of age; body weight <61kg; or serum creatinine ≥133 micromol/L (1.5 mg/dL).
OR
edoxaban: body weight <61 kg: 30 mg orally once daily; body weight ≥61 kg: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
dabigatran: 18-74 years of age: 150 mg orally twice daily; 75-79 years of age: 110-150 mg orally twice daily; ≥80 years of age: 110 mg orally twice daily
More dabigatranPatients on concomitant verapamil or amiodarone should receive the lower dose.
OR
heparin: consult specialist for guidance on dose
OR
enoxaparin: consult specialist for guidance on dose
These drug options and doses relate to a patient with no comorbidities.
Primary options
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
More apixabanPatients with at least two of the following characteristics should receive the lower dose: ≥80 years of age; body weight <61kg; or serum creatinine ≥133 micromol/L (1.5 mg/dL).
OR
edoxaban: body weight <61 kg: 30 mg orally once daily; body weight ≥61 kg: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
dabigatran: 18-74 years of age: 150 mg orally twice daily; 75-79 years of age: 110-150 mg orally twice daily; ≥80 years of age: 110 mg orally twice daily
More dabigatranPatients on concomitant verapamil or amiodarone should receive the lower dose.
OR
heparin: consult specialist for guidance on dose
OR
enoxaparin: consult specialist for guidance on dose
Drug choice, dose and interactions may be affected by the patient's comorbidities. Check your local drug formulary.
Show drug information for a patient with no comorbidities
Primary options
apixaban
OR
edoxaban
OR
rivaroxaban
OR
dabigatran
OR
heparin
OR
enoxaparin
treat underlying cause
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Identify and manage risk factors and concomitant conditions.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com Correct, where possible, treatable causes of AF or refer, as appropriate.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [32]Bradley A, Sheridan P. Atrial fibrillation. BMJ. 2013 Jun 17;346:f3719. https://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f3719 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23775800?tool=bestpractice.com Use local policies and guidelines alongside your clinical judgement to determine urgency.
In practice, refer to a cardiologist, any patient:
Who is young and has suspected underlying structural heart disease
With a pre-excitation syndrome such as Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.[53]Blomström-Lundqvist C, Scheinman MM, Aliot EM, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias: executive summary. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Oct 15;42(8):1493-531. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109703011410?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14563598?tool=bestpractice.com See Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
With valvular heart disease associated with AF
With suspected heart failure.
Practical tip
Signs of stroke or heart failure may be subtle in some instances.
longer-term anticoagulation strategy
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
After cardioversion, continue anticoagulation. If the patient has been started on parenteral anticoagulation before cardioversion, transition them to an appropriate oral anticoagulant.
Use the CHA 2DS 2-VASc score to calculate stroke risk in all patients presenting with AF.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [ Atrial Fibrillation CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Score for Stroke Risk Opens in new window ]
Consider oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in men with a CHA 2DS 2-VASc score of 1 or more and women with a score of 2 or more.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 In these groups, continue anticoagulation long-term.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) give an additional, stronger recommendation for higher CHA 2DS 2-VASc scores; the ESC recommends commencing oral anticoagulation in AF patients with a CHA 2DS 2-VASc score of 2 or more in men and 3 or more in women.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
If you are considering anticoagulation, use the ORBIT score or the HAS-BLED score to:[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [34]Borre ED, Goode A, Raitz G, et al. Predicting thromboembolic and bleeding event risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Thromb Haemost. 2018 Dec;118(12):2171-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754740 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376678?tool=bestpractice.com [36]Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, et al. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest. 2010 Nov;138(5):1093-100. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20299623?tool=bestpractice.com [ ORBIT Bleeding Risk Score Opens in new window ] [ HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk Score Opens in new window ]
Assess the risk of a major bleed
Identify (and subsequently manage) modifiable risk factors for bleeding, such as uncontrolled hypertension, harmful alcohol consumption, labile international normalised ratio (INR; if the patient is on warfarin), concurrent use of medication (including antiplatelets, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs), and reversible causes of anaemia
Flag the ‘high bleeding risk’ patients for early (4 weeks as opposed to 4-6 months) review and follow-up.
Guidelines from the ESC recommend use of the HAS-BLED score.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends use of the ORBIT score where possible, but either HAS-BLED or ORBIT is acceptable.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
Do not use bleeding risk scores to exclude anticoagulant treatment; a high score should not rule out anticoagulation.[64]Rohla M, Weiss TW, Pecen L, et al. Risk factors for thromboembolic and bleeding events in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: the prospective, multicentre observational PREvention oF thromboembolic events – European Registry in Atrial Fibrillation (PREFER in AF). BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 30;9(3):e022478. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/3/e022478.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30928922?tool=bestpractice.com
Bleeding risk is dynamic and requires regular re-assessment; it should not be based on a single one-off assessment.[65]Chao TF, Lip GYH, Lin YJ, et al. Incident risk factors and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulants: a comparison of baseline, follow-up and delta HAS-BLED scores with an approach focused on modifiable bleeding risk factors. Thromb Haemost. 2018 Apr;118(4):768-77. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29510426?tool=bestpractice.com
Practical tip
A history of falls is not an independent predictor of bleeding on oral anticoagulants. A modelling study estimated that a patient would need to fall 295 times per year for the benefits of ischaemic stroke reduction with oral anticoagulants to be outweighed by the potential for serious bleeding.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Practical tip
Follow your local protocol when choosing a bleeding risk score. 2020 guidelines from the ESC recommend use of the HAS-BLED score.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com NICE recommends preferential use of the ORBIT score in its 2021 guideline.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 However, subsequently published data show no advantage of ORBIT over HAS-BLED, even in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants, and suggest that in some circumstances ORBIT performs worse.[68]Proietti M, Romiti GF, Vitolo M, et al. Comparison of HAS-BLED and ORBIT bleeding risk scores in atrial fibrillation patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: a report from the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 Oct 26;8(7):778-86. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34555148?tool=bestpractice.com [69]Wattanaruengchai P, Nathisuwan S, Karaketklang K, et al. Comparison of the HAS-BLED versus ORBIT scores in predicting major bleeding among Asians receiving direct-acting oral anticoagulants. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 May;88(5):2203-12. https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.15145 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34783372?tool=bestpractice.com [70]Esteve-Pastor MA, Rivera-Caravaca JM, Roldán V, et al. Predicting performance of the HAS-BLED and ORBIT bleeding risk scores in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban: observations from the prospective EMIR Registry. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022 Dec 15;9(1):38-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36318457?tool=bestpractice.com The use of either score is reasonable, and the choice of bleeding risk score is less important than failure to consider anticoagulation at all.
When indicated by the CHA 2DS 2-VASc score, start oral anticoagulation as soon as possible.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Use a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in preference to a vitamin K antagonist.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 The ESC recommends DOACs in preference to a vitamin K antagonists.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Discuss the options for anticoagulation with the patient and base the choice on their clinical features and preferences.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
Before starting anticoagulation treatment, specifically discuss the potential risks and benefits with the patient, as part of the shared decision-making process, explaining that:[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
For most people the benefit of anticoagulation outweighs the bleeding risk
For people with an increased risk of bleeding the benefit of anticoagulation may not always outweigh the bleeding risk, and careful monitoring of bleeding risk is important.
If using a DOAC, choose one of apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com The choice of DOAC should be tailored to the person's clinical needs and preferences.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
DOACs have non-inferior efficacy and are possibly safer, particularly in terms of major bleeding, compared with warfarin.[71]Bruins Slot KM, Berge E. Factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists for preventing cerebral or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 6;3:CD008980. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008980.pub3 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29509959?tool=bestpractice.com [
] How do factor Xa inhibitors compare with warfarin for prevention of cerebral and systemic embolism in people with atrial fibrillation (AF)?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2101/fullShow me the answer[Evidence A]f36ae59f-7547-4cd9-b163-1962afa4027cccaAHow do factor Xa inhibitors compare with warfarin for prevention of cerebral and systemic embolism in people with atrial fibrillation (AF)? Unlike warfarin, DOACs don’t require laboratory anticoagulation monitoring.[72]Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2014 Mar 15;383(9921):955-62. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24315724?tool=bestpractice.com [73]Lip G, Freedman B, De Caterina R, et al. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: past, present and future – comparing the guidelines and practical decision-making. Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jun 28;117(7):1230-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28597905?tool=bestpractice.com
If using warfarin, start the patient on a parenteral anticoagulant (if they aren’t on one already as part of the pre-cardioversion anticoagulation), such as unfractionated heparin or a low molecular weight heparin, at the same time. Ensure INR is in the range of 2.0 to 3.0 before ceasing the parenteral anticoagulant.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [32]Bradley A, Sheridan P. Atrial fibrillation. BMJ. 2013 Jun 17;346:f3719. https://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f3719 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23775800?tool=bestpractice.com Ensure follow-up to maintain the patient’s time in therapeutic range (TTR) >65%.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 This approach is in line with recommendations from NICE and reflects common practice in the UK. Bear in mind, however, that guidelines from the ESC recommend maintaining TTR >70%.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Do not offer aspirin monotherapy solely for stroke prevention to people with AF.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
A specialist may consider non-drug options in the presence of absolute contraindications to oral anticoagulants, including:[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Active serious bleeding (where the source should be identified and treated)
Associated comorbidities (e.g., severe thrombocytopenia <50 platelets/microlitre, severe anaemia under investigation, etc.)
A recent high-risk bleeding event such as intracranial haemorrhage.
Primary options
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
More apixabanPatients with at least two of the following characteristics should receive the lower dose: ≥80 years of age; body weight <61kg; or serum creatinine ≥133 micromol/L (1.5 mg/dL).
OR
edoxaban: body weight <61 kg: 30 mg orally once daily; body weight ≥61 kg: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
dabigatran: 18-74 years of age: 150 mg orally twice daily; 75-79 years of age: 110-150 mg orally twice daily; ≥80 years of age: 110 mg orally twice daily
More dabigatranPatients on concomitant verapamil or amiodarone should receive the lower dose.
Secondary options
warfarin: 5-10 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. Warfarin dosing Opens in new window
These drug options and doses relate to a patient with no comorbidities.
Primary options
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
More apixabanPatients with at least two of the following characteristics should receive the lower dose: ≥80 years of age; body weight <61kg; or serum creatinine ≥133 micromol/L (1.5 mg/dL).
OR
edoxaban: body weight <61 kg: 30 mg orally once daily; body weight ≥61 kg: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
dabigatran: 18-74 years of age: 150 mg orally twice daily; 75-79 years of age: 110-150 mg orally twice daily; ≥80 years of age: 110 mg orally twice daily
More dabigatranPatients on concomitant verapamil or amiodarone should receive the lower dose.
Secondary options
warfarin: 5-10 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. Warfarin dosing Opens in new window
Drug choice, dose and interactions may be affected by the patient's comorbidities. Check your local drug formulary.
Show drug information for a patient with no comorbidities
Primary options
apixaban
OR
edoxaban
OR
rivaroxaban
OR
dabigatran
Secondary options
warfarin
haemodynamically stable: onset ≥48 hours or uncertain
rate control
Use rate control to slow the patient’s heart rate in the presence of tachycardia.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [2]Lafuente-Lafuente C, Mahé I, Extramiana F. Management of atrial fibrillation. BMJ. 2009 Dec 23;339:b5216. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20032065?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 In practice, do this while initially assessing the patient.
Rate control is often sufficient to improve AF-related symptoms.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Bear in mind that there is very little in the way of robust evidence to inform the best type and intensity of rate control treatment.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Use atrioventricular nodal blocking drugs – either a standard beta-blocker (that is, a beta-blocker other than sotalol) such as bisoprolol, metoprolol, esmolol, or carvedilol, or a rate-limiting non-dihydropyridine calcium-channel blocker (diltiazem or verapamil) – as initial monotherapy.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 Base the choice of drug on the person's symptoms, heart rate, comorbidities, and preferences when considering drug treatment.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
These are preferred first-line options as they have rapid onset of action and are effective for high sympathetic tone.[74]Segal JB, McNamara RL, Miller MR, et al. The evidence regarding the drugs used for ventricular rate control. J Fam Pract. 2000 Jan;49(1):47-59. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10678340?tool=bestpractice.com [75]Schreck DM, Rivera AR, Tricarico VJ. Emergency management of atrial fibrillation and flutter: intravenous diltiazem versus intravenous digoxin. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Jan;29(1):135-40. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8998092?tool=bestpractice.com [76]Siu CW, Lau CP, Lee WL, et al. Intravenous diltiazem is superior to intravenous amiodarone or digoxin for achieving ventricular rate control in patients with acute uncomplicated atrial fibrillation. Crit Care Med. 2009 Jul;37(7):2174-80. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19487941?tool=bestpractice.com [77]Tisdale JE, Padhi ID, Goldberg AD, et al. A randomized, double-blind comparison of intravenous diltiazem and digoxin for atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass surgery. Am Heart J. 1998 May;135(5 Pt 1):739-47. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9588402?tool=bestpractice.com [78]Scheuermeyer FX, Grafstein E, Stenstrom R, et al. Safety and efficiency of calcium channel blockers versus beta-blockers for rate control in patients with atrial fibrillation and no acute underlying medical illness. Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Mar;20(3):222-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23517253?tool=bestpractice.com
Bear in mind that rate-limiting calcium-channel blockers are contraindicated in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (a common comorbidity).
Alternative drugs are available. Seek advice from a specialist on the best option for your individual patient.
Consider digoxin monotherapy if the patient is sedentary (they do no or very little physical exercise) or if other rate-limiting drugs are not appropriate because of comorbidities or patient preferences.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 In practice, this is also a good option for older patients.
If monotherapy does not control symptoms, and if continuing symptoms are thought to be due to poor ventricular rate control, consider combination therapy with any two of the following:[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
A beta-blocker
Diltiazem
Bear in mind that this is contraindicated in people with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com See Acute heart failure
Digoxin.
Do not offer amiodarone for rate control in these patients. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends against use of long-term amiodarone (longer than 12 months) due to lack of evidence and the risk of serious side effects.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 You should only consider amiodarone for rate control in critically ill patients under the advice of a specialist.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Practical tip
In stable patients, oral therapy is reasonable. If the patient is stable but you wish to achieve more rapid rate control, intravenous administration is a better choice than oral. Intravenous administration is also useful for observation of acute adverse effects (as infusion can be discontinued promptly) and therefore appropriate dose titration.
Do not use rate control drugs in people with AF with a pre-excitation syndrome such as Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com In practice, seek advice from a specialist or senior colleague to determine suitable alternatives. See Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.
These drugs accelerate conduction down the accessory pathway to the ventricle putting the patient at risk of life-threatening arrhythmias, such as ventricular fibrillation and sudden death.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
bisoprolol: 1.25 mg orally once daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 20 mg/day
OR
metoprolol: 2.5 to 5 mg intravenously initially (at a rate of 1-2 mg/minute), may repeat every 5 minutes if required, maximum 10-15 mg/total dose; 50 mg orally (immediate-release) two to three times daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 300 mg/day
More metoprololThe European Society of Cardiology recommends a maximum intravenous dose of 20 mg/total dose, and an oral (immediate-release) dose of 25-100 mg twice daily.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
OR
esmolol: 500 micrograms/kg/minute intravenous infusion for 1 minute as a loading dose, followed by 50 micrograms/kg/minute infusion for 4 minutes, consult specialist for guidance as further dose titration depends on response; usual maintenance dose 50-200 micrograms/kg/minute
More esmololThe European Society of Cardiology recommends a maximum dose of 300 micrograms/kg/minute.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
OR
carvedilol: 3.125 mg orally twice daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 50 mg/day (body weight <85 kg) or 100 mg/day (body weight >85 kg)
OR
verapamil: 5-10 mg intravenously over 2 minutes, may repeat after 5-10 minutes if required; 40-120 mg orally (immediate-release) three times daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 480 mg
More verapamilThe European Society of Cardiology recommends a dose of 2.5 to 10 mg intravenously over 5 minutes. An extended-release oral formulation may be used if available.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
OR
diltiazem: 60 mg orally (immediate-release) three times daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 360 mg
More diltiazemThe European Society of Cardiology recommends intravenous diltiazem as a treatment option; however, this formulation is not available in the UK. An extended-release oral formulation may be used if available.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Secondary options
digoxin: 0.75 to 1.5 mg orally given in divided doses over 24 hours for rapid digitalisation, followed by maintenance dose of 0.125 to 0.25 mg/day
These drug options and doses relate to a patient with no comorbidities.
Primary options
bisoprolol: 1.25 mg orally once daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 20 mg/day
OR
metoprolol: 2.5 to 5 mg intravenously initially (at a rate of 1-2 mg/minute), may repeat every 5 minutes if required, maximum 10-15 mg/total dose; 50 mg orally (immediate-release) two to three times daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 300 mg/day
More metoprololThe European Society of Cardiology recommends a maximum intravenous dose of 20 mg/total dose, and an oral (immediate-release) dose of 25-100 mg twice daily.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
OR
esmolol: 500 micrograms/kg/minute intravenous infusion for 1 minute as a loading dose, followed by 50 micrograms/kg/minute infusion for 4 minutes, consult specialist for guidance as further dose titration depends on response; usual maintenance dose 50-200 micrograms/kg/minute
More esmololThe European Society of Cardiology recommends a maximum dose of 300 micrograms/kg/minute.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
OR
carvedilol: 3.125 mg orally twice daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 50 mg/day (body weight <85 kg) or 100 mg/day (body weight >85 kg)
OR
verapamil: 5-10 mg intravenously over 2 minutes, may repeat after 5-10 minutes if required; 40-120 mg orally (immediate-release) three times daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 480 mg
More verapamilThe European Society of Cardiology recommends a dose of 2.5 to 10 mg intravenously over 5 minutes. An extended-release oral formulation may be used if available.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
OR
diltiazem: 60 mg orally (immediate-release) three times daily initially, increase gradually according to response, maximum 360 mg
More diltiazemThe European Society of Cardiology recommends intravenous diltiazem as a treatment option; however, this formulation is not available in the UK. An extended-release oral formulation may be used if available.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Secondary options
digoxin: 0.75 to 1.5 mg orally given in divided doses over 24 hours for rapid digitalisation, followed by maintenance dose of 0.125 to 0.25 mg/day
Drug choice, dose and interactions may be affected by the patient's comorbidities. Check your local drug formulary.
Show drug information for a patient with no comorbidities
Primary options
bisoprolol
OR
metoprolol
OR
esmolol
OR
carvedilol
OR
verapamil
OR
diltiazem
Secondary options
digoxin
Plus – elective electrical or pharmacological cardioversion
elective electrical or pharmacological cardioversion
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
If the onset of AF is 48 hours or more, or is uncertain:[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
Make a plan for therapeutic anticoagulation for a minimum of 3 weeks followed by elective electrical or pharmacological cardioversion[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
Continue therapeutic anticoagulation for 4 weeks after cardioversion (in patients without a need for long-term anticoagulation).[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
Check the patient’s oral anticoagulation status.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
If the patient is already on therapeutic anticoagulation, proceed with cardioversion.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
If the patient is not on anticoagulation, assess bleeding risk using the ORBIT score or the HAS-BLED score and then start anticoagulation pre-cardioversion as soon as possible.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [ ORBIT Bleeding Risk Score Opens in new window ] [ HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk Score Opens in new window ]
Guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology recommend use of the HAS-BLED score.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends use of ORBIT over HAS-BLED where possible.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 In practice, either HAS-BLED or ORBIT is acceptable.
Beyond 4 weeks, base decisions about long-term anticoagulation on associated stroke risk factors, as per the patient’s CHA 2DS 2-VASc score.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [34]Borre ED, Goode A, Raitz G, et al. Predicting thromboembolic and bleeding event risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Thromb Haemost. 2018 Dec;118(12):2171-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754740 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376678?tool=bestpractice.com [ Atrial Fibrillation CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Score for Stroke Risk Opens in new window ] See Longer term anticoagulation strategy below.
Choose either pharmacological or electrical cardioversion depending on clinical circumstances, patient preferences, and resources, to reduce symptoms.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
Electrical cardioversion restores sinus rhythm quicker and more effectively than pharmacological cardioversion and is associated with shorter hospital stays.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [66]Crijns HJ, Weijs B, Fairley AM, et al. Contemporary real life cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: results from the multinational RHYTHM-AF study. Int J Cardiol. 2014 Apr 1;172(3):588-94. https://www.internationaljournalofcardiology.com/article/S0167-5273(14)00310-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24556445?tool=bestpractice.com Pharmacological cardioversion, however, does not require fasting or sedation.
Electrical cardioversion is achieved with synchronised direct current (DC) cardioversion. Pharmacological cardioversion uses an anti-arrhythmic drug, selected according to the patient’s history and condition.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
In haemodynamically stable patients, the decision to use electrical or pharmacological cardioversion will depend on local expertise, facilities and drugs available, the availability of a suitable clinician to administer sedation if electric cardioversion is selected, and patient preference.
Electrical cardioversion
Seek anaesthetic support to sedate the patient before DC cardioversion.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Intravenous sedation should not be administered in the fed state as this increases the risk of aspiration. The anaesthetist will also be able to advise how long the patient should be fasting for safe sedation.
Record and store an ECG rhythm strip during and immediately after shock delivery.
Continuously monitor the patient’s blood pressure and oximetry during the procedure.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [67]Furniss SS, Sneyd JR. Safe sedation in modern cardiological practice. Heart. 2015 Oct;101(19):1526-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26085525?tool=bestpractice.com
Bear in mind that some patients may develop sinus bradycardia after successful DC cardioversion. Ensure there are provisions for the use of intravenous atropine or isoprenaline or temporary transcutaneous pacing to manage post-cardioversion bradycardia until the patient stabilises.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Practical tip
Ensure the defibrillator is synchronised and that it remains synchronised between shocks.
If initial attempts at DC cardioversion fail, ensure there is good skin-to-electrode contact with the pads in the anteroposterior position.
Pharmacological cardioversion
Bear in mind that pharmacological cardioversion requires continuous medical supervision and ECG monitoring, regardless of the drug used, to detect a pro-arrhythmic event.[79]Camm AJ, Lüscher TF, Maurer G, et al, eds. The ESC textbook of cardiovascular medicine. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press/European Society of Cardiology; 2018.
In practice, this will usually be undertaken in a cardiac monitoring bed (e.g., in the cardiac care unit or a resuscitation bed in the accident and emergency department).
Use an anti-arrhythmic drug, selected according to the patient’s history and the overall clinical picture.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 NICE recommends offering:[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
A choice of flecainide or amiodarone to people with no evidence of structural or ischaemic heart disease
or
Amiodarone to people with evidence of structural heart disease
You will need a large-bore cannula for amiodarone.
Other anti-arrhythmics used outside of the UK include:[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Vernakalant – although available in the UK, it is rarely used
Ibutilide – not available in the UK.
Seek specialist opinion from a cardiologist if you are unsure about which drug to use.
Do not use sotalol.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
If using a class 1C anti-arrhythmic (e.g., flecainide), co-prescribe an atrioventricular (AV) nodal blocking agent (e.g., rate-limiting calcium-channel blocker or beta-blocker) if the patient is not already taking an AV nodal blocking agent. This is to prevent accelerated ventricular responses.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Using a sodium-channel blocker such as flecainide without an AV nodal blocking agent can convert to a slower atrial flutter rhythm, which allows the AV node to conduct in a 1:1 fashion and paradoxically results in faster ventricular response.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Although this can occur in the acute situation of pharmacological cardioversion it is more important when considering these drugs for longer-term management to prevent recurrent AF.
If in doubt, seek specialist cardiology advice.
Primary options
flecainide: 200-300 mg orally as a single dose
More flecainideThe European Society of Cardiology recommends intravenous flecainide as a treatment option at a dose of 2 mg/kg intravenously over 10 minutes; however, this formulation is not available in the UK.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
OR
amiodarone: 5-7 mg/kg intravenously over 1-2 hours, followed by 50 mg/hour intravenous infusion, maximum 1200 mg/day
These drug options and doses relate to a patient with no comorbidities.
Primary options
flecainide: 200-300 mg orally as a single dose
More flecainideThe European Society of Cardiology recommends intravenous flecainide as a treatment option at a dose of 2 mg/kg intravenously over 10 minutes; however, this formulation is not available in the UK.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
OR
amiodarone: 5-7 mg/kg intravenously over 1-2 hours, followed by 50 mg/hour intravenous infusion, maximum 1200 mg/day
Drug choice, dose and interactions may be affected by the patient's comorbidities. Check your local drug formulary.
Show drug information for a patient with no comorbidities
Primary options
flecainide
OR
amiodarone
pre-cardioversion anticoagulation
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Check the patient’s oral anticoagulation status.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
If the patient is already on therapeutic anticoagulation, proceed with cardioversion.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
If the patient is not on anticoagulation, assess bleeding risk using the ORBIT score or the HAS-BLED score and then start anticoagulation pre-cardioversion as soon as possible.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [ ORBIT Bleeding Risk Score Opens in new window ] [ HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk Score Opens in new window ]
Guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommend use of the HAS-BLED score.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends use of ORBIT over HAS-BLED where possible.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 In practice, either HAS-BLED or ORBIT is acceptable.
Choose an appropriate anticoagulant for the patient in line with your hospital protocols.
Guidelines from the ESC recommend using a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, or dabigatran; or a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), such as enoxaparin; or unfractionated heparin.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Guidelines from NICE recommend using a LMWH or unfractionated heparin at initial presentation in this group.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
Transition patients who are started on a LMWH or unfractionated heparin to a DOAC, such as rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, or dabigatran, or warfarin, when appropriate.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com See Longer-term anticoagulation strategy below.
Primary options
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
More apixabanPatients with at least two of the following characteristics should receive the lower dose: ≥80 years of age; body weight <61kg; or serum creatinine ≥133 micromol/L (1.5 mg/dL).
OR
edoxaban: body weight <61 kg: 30 mg orally once daily; body weight ≥61 kg: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
dabigatran: 18-74 years of age: 150 mg orally twice daily; 75-79 years of age: 110-150 mg orally twice daily; ≥80 years of age: 110 mg orally twice daily
More dabigatranPatients on concomitant verapamil or amiodarone should receive the lower dose.
OR
heparin: consult specialist for guidance on dose
OR
enoxaparin: consult specialist for guidance on dose
These drug options and doses relate to a patient with no comorbidities.
Primary options
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
More apixabanPatients with at least two of the following characteristics should receive the lower dose: ≥80 years of age; body weight <61kg; or serum creatinine ≥133 micromol/L (1.5 mg/dL).
OR
edoxaban: body weight <61 kg: 30 mg orally once daily; body weight ≥61 kg: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
dabigatran: 18-74 years of age: 150 mg orally twice daily; 75-79 years of age: 110-150 mg orally twice daily; ≥80 years of age: 110 mg orally twice daily
More dabigatranPatients on concomitant verapamil or amiodarone should receive the lower dose.
OR
heparin: consult specialist for guidance on dose
OR
enoxaparin: consult specialist for guidance on dose
Drug choice, dose and interactions may be affected by the patient's comorbidities. Check your local drug formulary.
Show drug information for a patient with no comorbidities
Primary options
apixaban
OR
edoxaban
OR
rivaroxaban
OR
dabigatran
OR
heparin
OR
enoxaparin
treat underlying cause
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Identify and manage risk factors and concomitant conditions.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com Correct, where possible, treatable causes of AF or refer, as appropriate.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [32]Bradley A, Sheridan P. Atrial fibrillation. BMJ. 2013 Jun 17;346:f3719. https://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f3719 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23775800?tool=bestpractice.com Use local policies and guidelines alongside your clinical judgement to determine urgency.
In practice, refer to a cardiologist, any patient:
Who is young and has suspected underlying structural heart disease
With a pre-excitation syndrome such as Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.[53]Blomström-Lundqvist C, Scheinman MM, Aliot EM, et al. ACC/AHA/ESC guidelines for the management of patients with supraventricular arrhythmias: executive summary. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Oct 15;42(8):1493-531. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109703011410?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14563598?tool=bestpractice.com See Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
With valvular heart disease associated with AF
With suspected heart failure.
Practical tip
Signs of stroke or heart failure may be subtle in some instances.
longer-term anticoagulation strategy
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
After cardioversion, continue anticoagulation. If the patient has been started on parenteral anticoagulation before cardioversion, transition them to an appropriate oral anticoagulant.
Use the CHA 2DS 2-VASc score to calculate stroke risk in all patients presenting with AF.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [ Atrial Fibrillation CHA(2)DS(2)-VASc Score for Stroke Risk Opens in new window ]
Consider oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in men with a CHA 2DS 2-VASc score of 1 or more and women with a score of 2 or more.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 In these groups, continue anticoagulation long-term.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Guidelines from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) give an additional, stronger recommendation for higher CHA 2DS 2-VASc scores; the ESC recommends commencing oral anticoagulation in AF patients with a CHA 2DS 2-VASc score of 2 or more in men and 3 or more in women.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
If you are considering anticoagulation, use the ORBIT score or HAS-BLED score to:[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [34]Borre ED, Goode A, Raitz G, et al. Predicting thromboembolic and bleeding event risk in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: a systematic review. Thromb Haemost. 2018 Dec;118(12):2171-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6754740 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30376678?tool=bestpractice.com [36]Pisters R, Lane DA, Nieuwlaat R, et al. A novel user-friendly score (HAS-BLED) to assess 1-year risk of major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation: the Euro Heart Survey. Chest. 2010 Nov;138(5):1093-100. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20299623?tool=bestpractice.com [ ORBIT Bleeding Risk Score Opens in new window ] [ HAS-BLED Bleeding Risk Score Opens in new window ]
Assess the risk of a major bleed
Identify (and subsequently manage) modifiable risk factors for bleeding, such as uncontrolled hypertension, harmful alcohol consumption, labile international normalised ratio (INR; if the patient is on warfarin), and concurrent use of aspirin or a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug
Flag the ‘high bleeding risk’ patients for early (4 weeks as opposed to 4-6 months) review and follow-up.
Guidelines from the ESC recommend use of the HAS-BLED score.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommends use of the ORBIT score where possible, but either HAS-BLED or ORBIT is acceptable.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
Do not use bleeding risk scores to exclude anticoagulant treatment; a high score should not rule out anticoagulation.[64]Rohla M, Weiss TW, Pecen L, et al. Risk factors for thromboembolic and bleeding events in anticoagulated patients with atrial fibrillation: the prospective, multicentre observational PREvention oF thromboembolic events – European Registry in Atrial Fibrillation (PREFER in AF). BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 30;9(3):e022478. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/9/3/e022478.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30928922?tool=bestpractice.com
Bleeding risk is dynamic and requires regular re-assessment; it should not be based on a single one-off assessment.[65]Chao TF, Lip GYH, Lin YJ, et al. Incident risk factors and major bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with oral anticoagulants: a comparison of baseline, follow-up and delta HAS-BLED scores with an approach focused on modifiable bleeding risk factors. Thromb Haemost. 2018 Apr;118(4):768-77. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29510426?tool=bestpractice.com
Practical tip
A history of falls is not an independent predictor of bleeding on oral anticoagulants. A modelling study estimated that a patient would need to fall 295 times per year for the benefits of ischaemic stroke reduction with oral anticoagulants to be outweighed by the potential for serious bleeding.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Practical tip
Follow your local protocol when choosing a bleeding risk score. 2020 guidelines from the ESC recommend use of the HAS-BLED score.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com NICE recommends preferential use of the ORBIT score in its 2021 guideline.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 However, subsequently published data show no advantage of ORBIT over HAS-BLED, even in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants, and suggest that in some circumstances ORBIT performs worse.[68]Proietti M, Romiti GF, Vitolo M, et al. Comparison of HAS-BLED and ORBIT bleeding risk scores in atrial fibrillation patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants: a report from the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2022 Oct 26;8(7):778-86. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34555148?tool=bestpractice.com [69]Wattanaruengchai P, Nathisuwan S, Karaketklang K, et al. Comparison of the HAS-BLED versus ORBIT scores in predicting major bleeding among Asians receiving direct-acting oral anticoagulants. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 May;88(5):2203-12. https://bpspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bcp.15145 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34783372?tool=bestpractice.com [70]Esteve-Pastor MA, Rivera-Caravaca JM, Roldán V, et al. Predicting performance of the HAS-BLED and ORBIT bleeding risk scores in patients with atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban: observations from the prospective EMIR Registry. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2022 Dec 15;9(1):38-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36318457?tool=bestpractice.com The use of either score is reasonable, and the choice of bleeding risk score is less important than failure to consider anticoagulation at all.
When indicated by the CHA 2DS 2-VASc score, start oral anticoagulation as soon as possible.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Use a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in preference to a vitamin K antagonist.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 The ESC recommends DOACs in preference to a vitamin K antagonists.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Discuss the options for anticoagulation with the patient and base the choice on their clinical features and preferences.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
Before starting anticoagulation treatment, specifically discuss the potential risks and benefits with the patient, as part of the shared decision-making process, explaining that:[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
For most people the benefit of anticoagulation outweighs the bleeding risk
For people with an increased risk of bleeding the benefit of anticoagulation may not always outweigh the bleeding risk, and careful monitoring of bleeding risk is important.
If using a DOAC, choose one of apixaban, edoxaban, rivaroxaban, or dabigatran.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com The choice of DOAC should be tailored to the person's clinical needs and preferences.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
DOACs have non-inferior efficacy and are possibly safer, particularly in terms of major bleeding, compared with warfarin.[71]Bruins Slot KM, Berge E. Factor Xa inhibitors versus vitamin K antagonists for preventing cerebral or systemic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 6;3:CD008980. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008980.pub3 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29509959?tool=bestpractice.com [
] How do factor Xa inhibitors compare with warfarin for prevention of cerebral and systemic embolism in people with atrial fibrillation (AF)?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2101/fullShow me the answer[Evidence A]f36ae59f-7547-4cd9-b163-1962afa4027cccaAHow do factor Xa inhibitors compare with warfarin for prevention of cerebral and systemic embolism in people with atrial fibrillation (AF)? Unlike warfarin, DOACs don’t require laboratory anticoagulation monitoring.[72]Ruff CT, Giugliano RP, Braunwald E, et al. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of new oral anticoagulants with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet. 2014 Mar 15;383(9921):955-62. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24315724?tool=bestpractice.com [73]Lip G, Freedman B, De Caterina R, et al. Stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: past, present and future – comparing the guidelines and practical decision-making. Thromb Haemost. 2017 Jun 28;117(7):1230-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28597905?tool=bestpractice.com
If using warfarin, start the patient on a parenteral anticoagulant (if they aren’t on one already as part of the pre-cardioversion anticoagulation), such as unfractionated heparin or a low molecular weight heparin, at the same time. Ensure INR is in the range of 2.0 to 3.0 before ceasing the parenteral anticoagulant.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com [3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 [32]Bradley A, Sheridan P. Atrial fibrillation. BMJ. 2013 Jun 17;346:f3719. https://www.bmj.com/content/346/bmj.f3719 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23775800?tool=bestpractice.com Ensure follow-up to maintain the patient’s time in therapeutic range (TTR) >65%.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196 This approach is in line with recommendations from NICE and reflects common practice in the UK. Bear in mind, however, that guidelines from the ESC recommend maintaining TTR >70%.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Do not offer aspirin monotherapy solely for stroke prevention to people with AF.[3]National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Atrial fibrillation: diagnosis and management. June 2021 [internet publication]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng196
A specialist may consider non-drug options in the presence of absolute contraindications to oral anticoagulants, including:[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Active serious bleeding (where the source should be identified and treated)
Associated comorbidities (e.g., severe thrombocytopenia <50 platelets/microlitre, severe anaemia under investigation, etc.)
A recent high-risk bleeding event such as intracranial haemorrhage.
Primary options
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
More apixabanPatients with at least two of the following characteristics should receive the lower dose: ≥80 years of age; body weight <61kg; or serum creatinine ≥133 micromol/L (1.5 mg/dL).
OR
edoxaban: body weight <61 kg: 30 mg orally once daily; body weight ≥61 kg: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
dabigatran: 18-74 years of age: 150 mg orally twice daily; 75-79 years of age: 110-150 mg orally twice daily; ≥80 years of age: 110 mg orally twice daily
More dabigatranPatients on concomitant verapamil or amiodarone should receive the lower dose.
Secondary options
warfarin: 5-10 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. Warfarin dosing Opens in new window
These drug options and doses relate to a patient with no comorbidities.
Primary options
apixaban: 2.5 to 5 mg orally twice daily
More apixabanPatients with at least two of the following characteristics should receive the lower dose: ≥80 years of age; body weight <61kg; or serum creatinine ≥133 micromol/L (1.5 mg/dL).
OR
edoxaban: body weight <61 kg: 30 mg orally once daily; body weight ≥61 kg: 60 mg orally once daily
OR
rivaroxaban: 20 mg orally once daily
OR
dabigatran: 18-74 years of age: 150 mg orally twice daily; 75-79 years of age: 110-150 mg orally twice daily; ≥80 years of age: 110 mg orally twice daily
More dabigatranPatients on concomitant verapamil or amiodarone should receive the lower dose.
Secondary options
warfarin: 5-10 mg orally once daily initially, adjust dose according to target INR
More warfarinStarting dose can be calculated using an online tool that takes patient characteristics and/or CYP2C9/VKORC1 genotype information (if available) into account. Warfarin dosing Opens in new window
Drug choice, dose and interactions may be affected by the patient's comorbidities. Check your local drug formulary.
Show drug information for a patient with no comorbidities
Primary options
apixaban
OR
edoxaban
OR
rivaroxaban
OR
dabigatran
Secondary options
warfarin
post-stabilisation
specialist referral for follow-up
It is good practice to refer all patients who have been admitted to hospital with AF for appropriate follow-up; this will tend to be in primary care (by specially trained nurses), by cardiologists, or by AF specialists. Follow-up usually comprises:
Implementation of agreed management plans
Continued engagement of the patient
Treatment adaptation, if needed.
Plus – advice on lifestyle, cardiovascular risk factors, and comorbidities
advice on lifestyle, cardiovascular risk factors, and comorbidities
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Identify unhealthy lifestyle factors and give the patient advice on these to help prevent recurrence.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com Focus, where relevant, on the following factors.
Physical activity: encourage the patient to undertake moderate-intensity exercise and remain physically active.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com Advise the patient to avoid excessive endurance exercise (e.g., marathons and long-distance triathlons), especially if they are over 50 years old.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Weight loss with comprehensive management of concomitant cardiovascular risk factors: maintaining a healthy weight may reduce blood pressure, dyslipidaemia, and risk of developing type 2 diabetes mellitus, therefore improving the patient’s overall cardiovascular risk profile.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Alcohol intake reduction: regular heavier alcohol consumption (>14 units/week) is associated with an increased risk of AF.[23]Gémes K, Malmo V, Laugsand LE, et al. Does moderate drinking increase the risk of atrial fibrillation? The Norwegian HUNT (Nord-Trøndelag health) study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017 Oct 20;6(10):e007094. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5721892 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29054845?tool=bestpractice.com Alcohol abstinence has been shown to reduce arrhythmia recurrence in regular drinkers with AF.[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Work with the patient to identify strategies for comprehensive risk-factor modification and interventions targeting underlying conditions that may apply, in particular:[1]Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. 2020 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021 Feb 1;42(5):373-498. https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/42/5/373/5899003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860505?tool=bestpractice.com
Hypertension
Heart failure
Coronary artery disease
Diabetes mellitus
Obstructive sleep apnoea
Choose a patient group to see our recommendations
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups. See disclaimer
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer