Prostate cancer
- Overview
- Theory
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Follow up
- Resources
Treatment algorithm
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups: see disclaimer
very low-risk disease
observation
For very low-risk disease, the following criteria must be met: cT1c tumour, Grade Group 1, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <10 micrograms/L (<10 nanograms/mL), <3 prostate biopsy fragments/cores positive, ≤50% cancer in each fragment/core, and PSA density <0.15 micrograms/L/g (<0.15 nanograms/mL/g).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
The treatment option for patients with very low-risk disease and a life expectancy <10 years is observation. This involves monitoring the course of the disease with a view to delivering treatment or palliative therapy when symptoms arise or when there is a change in clinical findings that suggest symptoms are imminent.
Observation should include a history and physical examination no more often than every 12 months (without prostate biopsies).[145]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part I - introduction, risk assessment, staging, and risk-based management. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):10-8. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002757 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536144?tool=bestpractice.com If patients become symptomatic, assessment should be performed (including prostate-specific antigen [PSA] and PSA doubling time, life expectancy estimate, and quality-of-life measures) to determine need for, and consideration of, treatment or palliation.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
androgen deprivation therapy alone (if symptomatic and life expectancy ≤5 years)
Patients with life expectancy ≤5 years who become symptomatic during observation can receive androgen deprivation therapy alone for palliation (e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
leuprorelin
OR
goserelin
OR
degarelix
OR
relugolix
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and the bisphosphonates zoledronic acid and alendronic acid are recommended to reduce the risk of bone fractures in patients with non-metastatic disease if they are receiving ADT and have osteoporosis (e.g., T score -2.5 on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] scan) or an increased risk of fractures (e.g., ≥20% for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fractures, or ≥3% for 10-year risk of hip fractures, based on FRAX® [Fracture Risk Assessment Tool]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [360]Alibhai SMH, Zukotynski K, Walker-Dilks C, et al. Bone health and bone-targeted therapies for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 5;167(5):341-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785760?tool=bestpractice.com [361]Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, et al. Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2916-46. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01696 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532726?tool=bestpractice.com University of Sheffield: FRAX tool Opens in new window
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
active surveillance
For very low-risk disease, the following criteria must be met: cT1c tumour, Grade Group 1, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <10 micrograms/L (<10 nanograms/mL), <3 prostate biopsy fragments/cores positive, ≤50% cancer in each fragment/core, and PSA density <0.15 micrograms/L/g (<0.15 nanograms/mL/g).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
If life expectancy is ≥10 years, active surveillance is recommended.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Active surveillance involves monitoring the course of the disease (with additional use of prostate biopsies) until symptoms or signs of disease become clinically evident with the expectation to treat with definitive treatment if there is disease progression.
PSA level and digital rectal examination are checked no more often than every 6 and 12 months, respectively, unless clinically indicated.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [145]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part I - introduction, risk assessment, staging, and risk-based management. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):10-8. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002757 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536144?tool=bestpractice.com
Repeat prostate biopsy and repeat multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are carried out no more often than every 12 months unless clinically indicated.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx Intensity of active surveillance may be individualised based on patient and tumour factors, risk of progression, and life expectancy. However, most patients should have repeat biopsies every 2-5 years.
Confirmatory testing is recommended before starting active surveillance (within 6-12 months of diagnosis) if prebiopsy multiparametric MRI was not performed prior to diagnostic biopsy.[146]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part II - principles of active surveillance, principles of surgery, and follow-up. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):19-25. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002758 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536148?tool=bestpractice.com The role of confirmatory testing is to identify those at high risk for future disease upgrading or progression, and to ensure appropriate patients are selected for active surveillance.[146]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part II - principles of active surveillance, principles of surgery, and follow-up. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):19-25. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002758 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536148?tool=bestpractice.com
Confirmatory testing for active surveillance involves performing a multiparametric MRI (with PSA density calculation), if available, and/or biopsy (systematic and targeted), and/or molecular tumour analysis.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [102]Schoots IG, Nieboer D, Giganti F, et al. Is magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy a useful addition to systematic confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2018 Dec;122(6):946-58. https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.14358 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29679430?tool=bestpractice.com [147]Klotz L, Pond G, Loblaw A, et al. Randomized study of systematic biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging and targeted and systematic biopsy in men on active surveillance (ASIST): 2-year postbiopsy follow-up. Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):311-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31708295?tool=bestpractice.com All patients should have a confirmatory prostate biopsy within 1-2 years of initial diagnostic biopsy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
low-risk disease
observation
For low-risk disease, patients have all of the following and do not qualify for very low-risk disease: cT1-cT2a tumour, Grade Group 1, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <10 micrograms/L (<10 nanograms/mL).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
The treatment option for patients with low-risk disease and life expectancy <10 years is observation. This involves monitoring the course of the disease with a view to delivering treatment or palliative therapy when symptoms arise, or when there is a change in clinical findings that suggest symptoms are imminent.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Observation should include a history and physical examination no more often than every 12 months (without prostate biopsies).[145]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part I - introduction, risk assessment, staging, and risk-based management. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):10-8. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002757 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536144?tool=bestpractice.com If patients become symptomatic, assessment should be performed (including prostate-specific antigen [PSA] and PSA doubling time, life expectancy estimate, and quality-of-life measures) to determine need for, and consideration of, treatment or palliation.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
androgen deprivation therapy alone (if symptomatic and life expectancy ≤5 years)
Patients with life expectancy ≤5 years who become symptomatic during observation can receive androgen deprivation therapy alone for palliation (e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
leuprorelin
OR
goserelin
OR
degarelix
OR
relugolix
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and the bisphosphonates zoledronic acid and alendronic acid are recommended to reduce the risk of bone fractures in patients with non-metastatic disease if they are receiving ADT and have osteoporosis (e.g., T score -2.5 on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] scan) or an increased risk of fractures (e.g., ≥20% for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fractures, or ≥3% for 10-year risk of hip fractures, based on FRAX® [Fracture Risk Assessment Tool]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [360]Alibhai SMH, Zukotynski K, Walker-Dilks C, et al. Bone health and bone-targeted therapies for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 5;167(5):341-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785760?tool=bestpractice.com [361]Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, et al. Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2916-46. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01696 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532726?tool=bestpractice.com University of Sheffield: FRAX tool Opens in new window
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
active surveillance
For low-risk disease, patients have all of the following and do not qualify for very low-risk disease: cT1-cT2a tumour, Grade Group 1, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <10 micrograms/L (<10 nanograms/mL).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Patients with low-risk disease and life expectancy ≥10 years can delay definitive treatments (e.g., external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or radical prostatectomy) and undergo active surveillance instead, depending on the patient's wish to avoid treatment-related adverse effects.[166]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 May 12;352(19):1977-84. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa043739 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15888698?tool=bestpractice.com [167]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Filen F, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Aug 20;100(16):1144-54. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2518167 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18695132?tool=bestpractice.com [168]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):932-42. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118145 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24597866?tool=bestpractice.com
Active surveillance involves monitoring the course of the disease (with additional use of prostate biopsies) until symptoms or signs of disease become clinically evident with the expectation to treat with definitive treatment if there is disease progression.
PSA level and digital rectal examination are checked no more often than every 6 and 12 months, respectively, unless clinically indicated.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [145]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part I - introduction, risk assessment, staging, and risk-based management. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):10-8. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002757 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536144?tool=bestpractice.com
Repeat prostate biopsy and repeat multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are carried out no more often than every 12 months unless clinically indicated.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx Intensity of active surveillance may be individualised based on patient and tumour factors, risk of progression, and life expectancy. However, most patients should have repeat biopsies every 2-5 years.
Confirmatory testing is recommended before starting active surveillance (within 6-12 months of diagnosis) if prebiopsy multiparametric MRI was not performed prior to diagnostic biopsy.[146]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part II - principles of active surveillance, principles of surgery, and follow-up. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):19-25. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002758 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536148?tool=bestpractice.com The role of confirmatory testing is to identify those at high risk for future disease upgrading or progression, and to ensure appropriate patients are selected for active surveillance.[146]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part II - principles of active surveillance, principles of surgery, and follow-up. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):19-25. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002758 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536148?tool=bestpractice.com
Confirmatory testing for active surveillance involves performing a multiparametric MRI (with PSA density calculation), if available, and/or biopsy (systematic and targeted), and/or molecular tumour analysis.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [102]Schoots IG, Nieboer D, Giganti F, et al. Is magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy a useful addition to systematic confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2018 Dec;122(6):946-58. https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.14358 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29679430?tool=bestpractice.com [147]Klotz L, Pond G, Loblaw A, et al. Randomized study of systematic biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging and targeted and systematic biopsy in men on active surveillance (ASIST): 2-year postbiopsy follow-up. Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):311-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31708295?tool=bestpractice.com All patients should have a confirmatory prostate biopsy within 1-2 years of initial diagnostic biopsy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Active surveillance is the preferred approach for most patients with low-risk disease if life expectancy is ≥10 years, but is often under-utilised due to patient preference and lack of adherence.[178]Kinsella N, Stattin P, Cahill D, et al. Factors influencing men's choice of and adherence to active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: a mixed-method systematic review. Eur Urol. 2018 Sep;74(3):261-80. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29598981?tool=bestpractice.com [179]Salari K, Kuppermann D, Preston MA, et al. Active surveillance of prostate cancer is a viable option for men younger than 60 years. J Urol. 2019 Apr;201(4):721-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30664083?tool=bestpractice.com Use of standardised patient information, clinician education, and guidelines may improve uptake of and adherence to active surveillance.[178]Kinsella N, Stattin P, Cahill D, et al. Factors influencing men's choice of and adherence to active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: a mixed-method systematic review. Eur Urol. 2018 Sep;74(3):261-80. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29598981?tool=bestpractice.com Decisions about starting treatment should take into account factors that may increase the likelihood of regrading, including high PSA density, ≥3 positive cores, high genomic risk, and/or a known BRCA2 germline mutation.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
brachytherapy
For low-risk disease, patients have all of the following and do not qualify for very low-risk disease: cT1-cT2a tumour, Grade Group 1, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <10 micrograms/L (<10 nanograms/mL).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Brachytherapy is a treatment option for patients with low-risk disease and life expectancy ≥10 years.
Brachytherapy is a definitive treatment. The treatment goal is cure.
Brachytherapy is given as low-dose rate or as high-dose rate.
Low-dose rate brachytherapy involves the permanent transperineal implantation of radioactive sources into the prostate without any incision. The highest radiation dose is confined to the prostate and a small volume of surrounding tissue. The strength of radiation decreases over time, but low levels of radioactivity in the prostate will persist for 4-6 months depending on the half-life of the isotope used. Precautions should be taken in the short term to minimise close contact with pregnant women and small children.
High-dose rate brachytherapy involves the transperineal placement of treatment catheters through which an individual radioactive source is robotically placed temporarily at various dwell positions to achieve a conformal dose of radiation to the prostate. At the end of treatment the catheters are removed. Treatment is repeated up to five times to achieve a curative dose to the prostate.
external beam radiotherapy
For low-risk disease, patients have all of the following and do not qualify for very low-risk disease: cT1-cT2a tumour, Grade Group 1, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <10 micrograms/L (<10 nanograms/mL).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a treatment option for patients with low-risk disease and life expectancy ≥10 years.
EBRT is a definitive treatment. The treatment goal is cure.
Conventional fractionated EBRT typically employs daily doses of 1.8 to 2 Gy for 7-9 weeks (excluding weekends) to a total dose of 75.6 to 80 Gy. However, data suggest that hypofractionation (i.e., shorter treatment courses over 4-6 weeks using larger daily doses [>2-4 Gy], but smaller total doses [56-72 Gy]) may yield equivalent results to conventional fractionation.[151]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462.
https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
[152]Avkshtol V, Ruth KJ, Ross EA, et al. Ten-year update of a randomized, prospective trial of conventional fractionated versus moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15):1676-84.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238488
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32119599?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
How does hypofractionation compare with conventional fractionation radiotherapy for men with clinically localized prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2806/fullShow me the answer
Hypofractionation is now the preferred approach.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com Although it shortens treatment duration, it may slightly increase the risk of acute gastrointestinal adverse effects compared with conventional fractionation.[151]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
Ultra-hypofractionation may be considered for patients with localised disease, low metastatic burden disease, or oligometastatic disease.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com [154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com [155]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: an ASTRO, ASCO, and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 11;36(34):JCO1801097. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269129 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30307776?tool=bestpractice.com [156]Brand DH, Tree AC, Ostler P, et al. Intensity-modulated fractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): acute toxicity findings from an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1531-43. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838670 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31540791?tool=bestpractice.com [157]Widmark A, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L, et al. Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):385-95. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31227373?tool=bestpractice.com [158]Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2353-66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269599 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355464?tool=bestpractice.com [159]Phillips R, Shi WY, Deek M, et al. Outcomes of observation vs stereotactic ablative radiation for oligometastatic prostate cancer: the ORIOLE phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020 May 1;6(5):650-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225913 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215577?tool=bestpractice.com [160]Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligometastatic cancers: long-term results of the SABR-COMET phase II randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;38(25):2830-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460150 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32484754?tool=bestpractice.com A commonly used dosing schedule for ultra-hypofractionation is 7.25 Gy given every other day for 2 weeks (excluding weekends) to a total dose of 36.25 Gy.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com Other ultra-hypofractionation schedules ranging from 4-9 fractions of 5-10 Gy to a total dose of 36.25 to 50 Gy have been reported.[154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com Studies suggest comparable biochemical control and toxicity with ultra-hypofractionation versus more protracted fractionation schedules, but higher total doses are associated with a greater risk of severe late genitourinary complications.[154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy are the standard EBRT techniques because they allow for a highly conformal delivery of radiation that minimises dose to normal tissues (bladder, rectum, and small bowel), thereby potentially decreasing toxicity to these structures. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is the technique used to deliver ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy.
Biocompatible and biodegradable perirectal spacer materials can be implanted between the prostate and rectum in patients with organ-confined disease to reduce toxicity to the rectum.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [149]Miller LE, Efstathiou JA, Bhattacharyya SK, et al. Association of the placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer with the clinical outcomes of men receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208221. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2767246 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585020?tool=bestpractice.com [150]Hamstra DA, Mariados N, Sylvester J, et al. Continued benefit to rectal separation for prostate radiation therapy: final results of a phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Apr 1;97(5):976-85. https://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360-3016(16)33598-2/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209443?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with significant baseline urinary symptoms may not be suitable for EBRT due to increased risk of urinary obstruction.
radical prostatectomy
For low-risk disease, patients have all of the following and do not qualify for very low-risk disease: cT1-cT2a tumour, Grade Group 1, and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) <10 micrograms/L (<10 nanograms/mL).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Radical prostatectomy is a treatment option for patients with low-risk disease and life expectancy ≥10 years (depending on patient preference and suitability for surgery).
Radical prostatectomy is a definitive treatment. The treatment goal is cure.
Classically, the prostate and prostatic capsule are removed by excision of the urethra at the prostatomembranous junction. The seminal vesicles, ampulla, and vas deferens are also removed. Of the two classic open surgical approaches (retropubic/suprapubic and perineal), the retropubic/suprapubic approach is preferred by many urologists, as this approach facilitates access for pelvic lymph node dissection.
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy are alternative approaches that typically involve five or six small incisions in the abdomen from which the entire prostate is removed, theoretically sparing nerves more easily damaged by a retropubic/suprapubic approach.[162]Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22749852?tool=bestpractice.com [163]Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):418-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22749850?tool=bestpractice.com A Cochrane review found that laparoscopic or robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy may result in shorter hospital stays and fewer blood transfusions compared with open surgical radical prostatectomy, but improvements in oncological outcomes (e.g., recurrence or survival) were inconclusive.[164]Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;(9):CD009625. http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28895658?tool=bestpractice.com Complications (e.g., sexual and urinary dysfunction) appear to be similar between these alternative approaches and the open surgical approach.[164]Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;(9):CD009625. http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28895658?tool=bestpractice.com [165]Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1051-60. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30017351?tool=bestpractice.com
Radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localised prostate cancer that was not detected through PSA screening improves prostate cancer-specific mortality, overall survival, and risk of local disease progression and metastasis, compared with active surveillance.[166]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 May 12;352(19):1977-84. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa043739 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15888698?tool=bestpractice.com [167]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Filen F, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Aug 20;100(16):1144-54. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2518167 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18695132?tool=bestpractice.com These benefits have been shown to continue over the long-term, particularly in those aged ≤65 years.[168]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):932-42. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118145 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24597866?tool=bestpractice.com [169]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in prostate cancer - 29-year follow-up. N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 13;379(24):2319-29. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1807801 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30575473?tool=bestpractice.com
Radical prostatectomy in men with PSA-detected localised prostate cancer does not significantly reduce all-cause mortality or prostate cancer-specific mortality compared with active surveillance or observation.[170]Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3429335
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808955?tool=bestpractice.com
[171]Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-24.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1606220#t=article
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27626136?tool=bestpractice.com
[172]Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ, et al. Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 13;377(2):132-42.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1615869
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700844?tool=bestpractice.com
[173]Neal DE, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, et al. Ten-year mortality, disease progression, and treatment-related side effects in men with localised prostate cancer from the ProtecT randomised controlled trial according to treatment received. Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):320-30.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283819308371
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31771797?tool=bestpractice.com
Furthermore, radical prostatectomy is associated with a higher frequency of adverse events than active surveillance and observation.[170]Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3429335
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808955?tool=bestpractice.com
[171]Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-24.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1606220#t=article
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27626136?tool=bestpractice.com
[172]Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ, et al. Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 13;377(2):132-42.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1615869
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700844?tool=bestpractice.com
[173]Neal DE, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, et al. Ten-year mortality, disease progression, and treatment-related side effects in men with localised prostate cancer from the ProtecT randomised controlled trial according to treatment received. Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):320-30.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283819308371
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31771797?tool=bestpractice.com
[174]Vernooij RW, Lancee M, Cleves A, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 4;6(6):CD006590.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006590.pub3/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32495338?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
How does radical prostatectomy compare with deferred treatment for people with localized prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.3248/fullShow me the answer
favourable intermediate-risk disease
observation
For favourable intermediate-risk disease, patients have no high-risk or very high-risk features and all of the following: one intermediate risk factor (cT2b-c tumour; Grade Group 2; or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 10-20 micrograms/L [10-20 nanograms/mL]), Grade Group 1 (if not Grade Group 2), and percentage of positive biopsy cores <50%.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
There is no standard approach to managing patients with intermediate-risk disease. Few randomised trials have compared effectiveness between primary treatments.[180]Wilt TJ, MacDonald R, Rutks I, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 18;148(6):435-48. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18252677?tool=bestpractice.com Adverse effects of treatment may influence treatment choice.[182]Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Graham JD, et al. Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):475-87. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17482880?tool=bestpractice.com [183]Potosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, et al. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Sep 15;96(18):1358-67. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh259 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15367568?tool=bestpractice.com [184]Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12):1250-61. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa074311 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18354103?tool=bestpractice.com [185]Wolff RF, Ryder S, Bossi A, et al. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(16):2345-67. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.019 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26254809?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with favourable intermediate-risk disease and life expectancy <10 years can delay definitive treatments (e.g., brachytherapy or external beam radiotherapy) and undergo observation instead, depending on the patient's wish to avoid treatment-related adverse effects (e.g., gastrointestinal and genitourinary toxicity).[182]Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Graham JD, et al. Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):475-87. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17482880?tool=bestpractice.com [183]Potosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, et al. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Sep 15;96(18):1358-67. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh259 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15367568?tool=bestpractice.com [184]Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12):1250-61. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa074311 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18354103?tool=bestpractice.com [185]Wolff RF, Ryder S, Bossi A, et al. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(16):2345-67. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.019 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26254809?tool=bestpractice.com
Observation involves monitoring the course of the disease with a view to delivering treatment or palliative therapy when symptoms arise or when there is a change in clinical findings that suggest symptoms are imminent.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Observation should include a history and physical examination no more often than every 12 months (without prostate biopsies).[145]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part I - introduction, risk assessment, staging, and risk-based management. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):10-8. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002757 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536144?tool=bestpractice.com If patients become symptomatic, assessment should be performed (including prostate-specific antigen [PSA] and PSA doubling time, life expectancy estimate, and quality-of-life measures) to determine need for, and consideration of, treatment or palliation.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
androgen deprivation therapy alone (if symptomatic and life expectancy ≤5 years)
Patients with life expectancy ≤5 years who become symptomatic during observation can receive androgen deprivation therapy alone for palliation (e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
leuprorelin
OR
goserelin
OR
degarelix
OR
relugolix
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and the bisphosphonates zoledronic acid and alendronic acid are recommended to reduce the risk of bone fractures in patients with non-metastatic disease if they are receiving ADT and have osteoporosis (e.g., T score -2.5 on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] scan) or an increased risk of fractures (e.g., ≥20% for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fractures, or ≥3% for 10-year risk of hip fractures, based on FRAX® [Fracture Risk Assessment Tool]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [360]Alibhai SMH, Zukotynski K, Walker-Dilks C, et al. Bone health and bone-targeted therapies for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 5;167(5):341-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785760?tool=bestpractice.com [361]Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, et al. Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2916-46. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01696 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532726?tool=bestpractice.com University of Sheffield: FRAX tool Opens in new window
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
brachytherapy (if life expectancy 5-10 years)
For favourable intermediate-risk disease, patients have no high-risk or very high-risk features and all of the following: one intermediate risk factor (cT2b-c tumour; Grade Group 2; or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 10-20 micrograms/L [10-20 nanograms/mL]), Grade Group 1 (if not Grade Group 2), and percentage of positive biopsy cores <50%.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Brachytherapy is a treatment option for patients with favourable intermediate-risk disease and life expectancy 5-10 years (i.e., instead of observation).
Brachytherapy is a definitive treatment. The treatment goal is cure.
Brachytherapy is given as low-dose rate or as high-dose rate.
Low-dose rate brachytherapy involves the permanent transperineal implantation of radioactive sources into the prostate without any incision. The highest radiation dose is confined to the prostate and a small volume of surrounding tissue. The strength of radiation decreases over time, but low levels of radioactivity in the prostate will persist for 4-6 months depending on the half-life of the isotope used. Precautions should be taken in the short term to minimise close contact with pregnant women and small children.
High-dose rate brachytherapy involves the transperineal placement of treatment catheters through which an individual radioactive source is robotically placed temporarily at various dwell positions to achieve a conformal dose of radiation to the prostate. At the end of treatment the catheters are removed. Treatment is repeated up to five times to achieve a curative dose to the prostate.
external beam radiotherapy (if life expectancy 5-10 years)
For favourable intermediate-risk disease, patients have no high-risk or very high-risk features and all of the following: one intermediate risk factor (cT2b-c tumour; Grade Group 2; or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 10-20 micrograms/L [10-20 nanograms/mL]), Grade Group 1 (if not Grade Group 2), and percentage of positive biopsy cores <50%.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a treatment option for patients with favourable intermediate-risk disease and life expectancy 5-10 years (i.e., instead of observation).
EBRT is a definitive treatment. The treatment goal is cure.
Conventional fractionated EBRT typically employs daily doses of 1.8 to 2 Gy for 7-9 weeks (excluding weekends) to a total dose of 75.6 to 80 Gy. However, data suggest that hypofractionation (i.e., shorter treatment courses over 4-6 weeks using larger daily doses [>2-4 Gy], but smaller total doses [56-72 Gy]) may yield equivalent results to conventional fractionation.[151]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462.
https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
[152]Avkshtol V, Ruth KJ, Ross EA, et al. Ten-year update of a randomized, prospective trial of conventional fractionated versus moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15):1676-84.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238488
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32119599?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
How does hypofractionation compare with conventional fractionation radiotherapy for men with clinically localized prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2806/fullShow me the answer
Hypofractionation is now the preferred approach.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com Although it shortens treatment duration, it may slightly increase the risk of acute gastrointestinal adverse effects compared with conventional fractionation.[151]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
Ultra-hypofractionation may be considered for patients with localised disease, low metastatic burden disease, or oligometastatic disease.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com [154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com [155]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: an ASTRO, ASCO, and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 11;36(34):JCO1801097. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269129 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30307776?tool=bestpractice.com [156]Brand DH, Tree AC, Ostler P, et al. Intensity-modulated fractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): acute toxicity findings from an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1531-43. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838670 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31540791?tool=bestpractice.com [157]Widmark A, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L, et al. Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):385-95. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31227373?tool=bestpractice.com [158]Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2353-66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269599 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355464?tool=bestpractice.com [159]Phillips R, Shi WY, Deek M, et al. Outcomes of observation vs stereotactic ablative radiation for oligometastatic prostate cancer: the ORIOLE phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020 May 1;6(5):650-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225913 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215577?tool=bestpractice.com [160]Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligometastatic cancers: long-term results of the SABR-COMET phase II randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;38(25):2830-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460150 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32484754?tool=bestpractice.com A commonly used dosing schedule for ultra-hypofractionation is 7.25 Gy given every other day for 2 weeks (excluding weekends) to a total dose of 36.25 Gy.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com Other ultra-hypofractionation schedules ranging from 4-9 fractions of 5-10 Gy to a total dose of 36.25 to 50 Gy have been reported.[154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com Studies suggest comparable biochemical control and toxicity with ultra-hypofractionation versus more protracted fractionation schedules, but higher total doses are associated with a greater risk of severe late genitourinary complications.[154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy are the standard EBRT techniques because they allow for a highly conformal delivery of radiation that minimises dose to normal tissues (bladder, rectum, and small bowel), thereby potentially decreasing toxicity to these structures. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is the technique used to deliver ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy.
Biocompatible and biodegradable perirectal spacer materials can be implanted between the prostate and rectum in patients with organ-confined disease to reduce toxicity to the rectum.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [149]Miller LE, Efstathiou JA, Bhattacharyya SK, et al. Association of the placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer with the clinical outcomes of men receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208221. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2767246 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585020?tool=bestpractice.com [150]Hamstra DA, Mariados N, Sylvester J, et al. Continued benefit to rectal separation for prostate radiation therapy: final results of a phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Apr 1;97(5):976-85. https://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360-3016(16)33598-2/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209443?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with significant baseline urinary symptoms may not be suitable for EBRT due to increased risk of urinary obstruction.
active surveillance
For favourable intermediate-risk disease, patients have no high-risk or very high-risk features and all of the following: one intermediate risk factor (cT2b-c tumour; Grade Group 2; or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 10-20 micrograms/L [10-20 nanograms/mL]), Grade Group 1 (if not Grade Group 2), and percentage of positive biopsy cores <50%.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
There is no standard approach to managing patients with intermediate-risk disease. Few randomised trials have compared effectiveness between primary treatments.[180]Wilt TJ, MacDonald R, Rutks I, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 18;148(6):435-48. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18252677?tool=bestpractice.com Adverse effects of treatment may influence treatment choice.[182]Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Graham JD, et al. Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):475-87. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17482880?tool=bestpractice.com [183]Potosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, et al. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Sep 15;96(18):1358-67. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh259 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15367568?tool=bestpractice.com [184]Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12):1250-61. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa074311 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18354103?tool=bestpractice.com [185]Wolff RF, Ryder S, Bossi A, et al. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(16):2345-67. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.019 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26254809?tool=bestpractice.com Worse urinary incontinence and sexual/erectile dysfunction have been reported in patients who had radical prostatectomy compared with other treatments.[186]Barocas DA, Alvarez J, Resnick MJ, et al. Association between radiation therapy, surgery, or observation for localized prostate cancer and patient-reported outcomes after 3 years. JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1126-40. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2612618 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28324093?tool=bestpractice.com [187]Chen RC, Basak R, Meyer AM, et al. Association between choice of radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or active surveillance and patient-reported quality of life among men with localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1141-50. https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.1652 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28324092?tool=bestpractice.com [188]Hoffman KE, Penson DF, Zhao Z, et al. Patient-reported outcomes through 5 years for active surveillance, surgery, brachytherapy, or external beam radiation with or without androgen deprivation therapy for localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2020 Jan 14;323(2):149-63. https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.20675 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31935027?tool=bestpractice.com [189]Lane JA, Donovan JL, Young GJ, et al. Functional and quality of life outcomes of localised prostate cancer treatments (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment [ProtecT] study). BJU Int. 2022 Sep;130(3):370-80. https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.15739 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35373443?tool=bestpractice.com Brachytherapy may be associated with worse short-term urinary obstruction and irritation, and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with worse bowel function and short-term bowel symptoms.[187]Chen RC, Basak R, Meyer AM, et al. Association between choice of radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or active surveillance and patient-reported quality of life among men with localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1141-50. https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.1652 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28324092?tool=bestpractice.com [189]Lane JA, Donovan JL, Young GJ, et al. Functional and quality of life outcomes of localised prostate cancer treatments (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment [ProtecT] study). BJU Int. 2022 Sep;130(3):370-80. https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.15739 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35373443?tool=bestpractice.com [190]Lardas M, Liew M, van den Bergh RC, et al. Quality of life outcomes after primary treatment for clinically localised prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):869-85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0302283817305353?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28757301?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with favourable intermediate-risk disease and life expectancy ≥10 years may delay definitive treatments (e.g., brachytherapy, EBRT, or radical prostatectomy) and undergo active surveillance instead, depending on the patient's wish to avoid treatment-related adverse effects.[166]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 May 12;352(19):1977-84. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa043739 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15888698?tool=bestpractice.com [167]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Filen F, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Aug 20;100(16):1144-54. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2518167 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18695132?tool=bestpractice.com [168]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):932-42. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118145 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24597866?tool=bestpractice.com [182]Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Graham JD, et al. Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):475-87. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17482880?tool=bestpractice.com [183]Potosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, et al. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Sep 15;96(18):1358-67. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh259 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15367568?tool=bestpractice.com [184]Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12):1250-61. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa074311 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18354103?tool=bestpractice.com [185]Wolff RF, Ryder S, Bossi A, et al. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(16):2345-67. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.019 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26254809?tool=bestpractice.com
Active surveillance involves monitoring the course of the disease (with additional use of prostate biopsies) until symptoms or signs of disease become clinically evident with the expectation to treat with definitive treatment if there is disease progression.
PSA level and digital rectal examination are checked no more often than every 6 and 12 months unless clinically indicated.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [145]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part I - introduction, risk assessment, staging, and risk-based management. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):10-8. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002757 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536144?tool=bestpractice.com
Repeat prostate biopsy and repeat multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are carried out no more often than every 12 months unless clinically indicated.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx Intensity of active surveillance may be individualised based on patient and tumour factors, risk of progression, and life expectancy. However, most patients should have repeat biopsies every 2-5 years.
Confirmatory testing is recommended before starting active surveillance (within 6-12 months of diagnosis) if prebiopsy multiparametric MRI was not performed prior to diagnostic biopsy.[146]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part II - principles of active surveillance, principles of surgery, and follow-up. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):19-25. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002758 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536148?tool=bestpractice.com The role of confirmatory testing is to identify those at high risk for future disease upgrading or progression, and to ensure appropriate patients are selected for active surveillance.[146]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part II - principles of active surveillance, principles of surgery, and follow-up. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):19-25. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002758 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536148?tool=bestpractice.com
Confirmatory testing for active surveillance involves performing a multiparametric MRI (with PSA density calculation), if available, and/or biopsy (systematic and targeted), and/or molecular tumour analysis.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [102]Schoots IG, Nieboer D, Giganti F, et al. Is magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy a useful addition to systematic confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int. 2018 Dec;122(6):946-58. https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.14358 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29679430?tool=bestpractice.com [147]Klotz L, Pond G, Loblaw A, et al. Randomized study of systematic biopsy versus magnetic resonance imaging and targeted and systematic biopsy in men on active surveillance (ASIST): 2-year postbiopsy follow-up. Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):311-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31708295?tool=bestpractice.com All patients should have a confirmatory prostate biopsy within 1-2 years of initial diagnostic biopsy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
brachytherapy
For favourable intermediate-risk disease, patients have no high-risk or very high-risk features and all of the following: one intermediate risk factor (cT2b-c tumour; Grade Group 2; or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 10-20 micrograms/L [10-20 nanograms/mL]), Grade Group 1 (if not Grade Group 2), and percentage of positive biopsy cores <50%.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Brachytherapy is a treatment option for patients with favourable intermediate-risk disease and life expectancy ≥10 years.
Brachytherapy is a definitive treatment. The treatment goal is cure.
Brachytherapy is given as low-dose rate or as high-dose rate.
Low-dose rate brachytherapy involves the permanent transperineal implantation of radioactive sources into the prostate without any incision. The highest radiation dose is confined to the prostate and a small volume of surrounding tissue. The strength of radiation decreases over time, but low levels of radioactivity in the prostate will persist for 4-6 months depending on the half-life of the isotope used. Precautions should be taken in the short term to minimise close contact with pregnant women and small children.
High-dose rate brachytherapy involves the transperineal placement of treatment catheters through which an individual radioactive source is robotically placed temporarily at various dwell positions to achieve a conformal dose of radiation to the prostate. At the end of treatment the catheters are removed. Treatment is repeated up to five times to achieve a curative dose to the prostate.
external beam radiotherapy
For favourable intermediate-risk disease, patients have no high-risk or very high-risk features and all of the following: one intermediate risk factor (cT2b-c tumour; Grade Group 2; or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 10-20 micrograms/L [10-20 nanograms/mL]), Grade Group 1 (if not Grade Group 2), and percentage of positive biopsy cores <50%.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is a treatment option for patients with favourable intermediate-risk disease and life expectancy ≥10 years.
EBRT is a definitive treatment. The treatment goal is cure.
Conventional fractionated EBRT typically employs daily doses of 1.8 to 2 Gy for 7-9 weeks (excluding weekends) to a total dose of 75.6 to 80 Gy. However, data suggest that hypofractionation (i.e., shorter treatment courses over 4-6 weeks using larger daily doses [>2-4 Gy], but smaller total doses [56-72 Gy]) may yield equivalent results to conventional fractionation.[151]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462.
https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
[152]Avkshtol V, Ruth KJ, Ross EA, et al. Ten-year update of a randomized, prospective trial of conventional fractionated versus moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15):1676-84.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238488
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32119599?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
How does hypofractionation compare with conventional fractionation radiotherapy for men with clinically localized prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2806/fullShow me the answer
Hypofractionation is now the preferred approach.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com Although it shortens treatment duration, it may slightly increase the risk of acute gastrointestinal adverse effects compared with conventional fractionation.[151]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
Ultra-hypofractionation may be considered for patients with localised disease, low metastatic burden disease, or oligometastatic disease.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com [154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com [155]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: an ASTRO, ASCO, and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 11;36(34):JCO1801097. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269129 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30307776?tool=bestpractice.com [156]Brand DH, Tree AC, Ostler P, et al. Intensity-modulated fractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): acute toxicity findings from an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1531-43. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838670 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31540791?tool=bestpractice.com [157]Widmark A, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L, et al. Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):385-95. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31227373?tool=bestpractice.com [158]Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2353-66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269599 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355464?tool=bestpractice.com [159]Phillips R, Shi WY, Deek M, et al. Outcomes of observation vs stereotactic ablative radiation for oligometastatic prostate cancer: the ORIOLE phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020 May 1;6(5):650-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225913 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215577?tool=bestpractice.com [160]Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligometastatic cancers: long-term results of the SABR-COMET phase II randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;38(25):2830-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460150 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32484754?tool=bestpractice.com A commonly used dosing schedule for ultra-hypofractionation is 7.25 Gy given every other day for 2 weeks (excluding weekends) to a total dose of 36.25 Gy.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com Other ultra-hypofractionation schedules ranging from 4-9 fractions of 5-10 Gy to a total dose of 36.25 to 50 Gy have been reported.[154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com Studies suggest comparable biochemical control and toxicity with ultra-hypofractionation versus more protracted fractionation schedules, but higher total doses are associated with a greater risk of severe late genitourinary complications.[154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy are the standard EBRT techniques because they allow for a highly conformal delivery of radiation that minimises dose to normal tissues (bladder, rectum, and small bowel), thereby potentially decreasing toxicity to these structures. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is the technique used to deliver ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy.
Biocompatible and biodegradable perirectal spacer materials can be implanted between the prostate and rectum in patients with organ-confined disease to reduce toxicity to the rectum.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [149]Miller LE, Efstathiou JA, Bhattacharyya SK, et al. Association of the placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer with the clinical outcomes of men receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208221. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2767246 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585020?tool=bestpractice.com [150]Hamstra DA, Mariados N, Sylvester J, et al. Continued benefit to rectal separation for prostate radiation therapy: final results of a phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Apr 1;97(5):976-85. https://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360-3016(16)33598-2/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209443?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with significant baseline urinary symptoms may not be suitable for EBRT due to increased risk of urinary obstruction.
Prophylactic pelvic nodal irradiation may be considered in patients with intermediate-risk disease who are undergoing radiotherapy, but only if further risk assessment (e.g., nomograms, biomarker testing) indicates aggressive disease.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
radical prostatectomy ± lymph node dissection
For favourable intermediate-risk disease, patients have no high-risk or very high-risk features and all of the following: one intermediate risk factor (cT2b-c tumour; Grade Group 2; or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 10-20 micrograms/L [10-20 nanograms/mL]), Grade Group 1 (if not Grade Group 2), and percentage of positive biopsy cores <50%.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Radical prostatectomy is a treatment option for patients with favourable intermediate-risk disease and life expectancy ≥10 years (depending on patient preference and suitability for surgery). Pelvic lymph node dissection may be carried out (depending on nomogram assessment).
Radical prostatectomy is a definitive treatment. The treatment goal is cure.
Classically, the prostate and prostatic capsule are removed by excision of the urethra at the prostatomembranous junction. The seminal vesicles, ampulla, and vas deferens are also removed. Of the two classic open surgical approaches (retropubic/suprapubic and perineal), the retropubic/suprapubic approach is preferred by many urologists, as this approach facilitates access for pelvic lymph node dissection.
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy are alternative approaches that typically involve five or six small incisions in the abdomen from which the entire prostate is removed, theoretically sparing nerves more easily damaged by a retropubic/suprapubic approach.[162]Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22749852?tool=bestpractice.com [163]Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):418-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22749850?tool=bestpractice.com A Cochrane review found that laparoscopic or robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy may result in shorter hospital stays and fewer blood transfusions compared with open surgical radical prostatectomy, but improvements in oncological outcomes (e.g., recurrence or survival) were inconclusive.[164]Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;(9):CD009625. http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28895658?tool=bestpractice.com Complications (e.g., sexual and urinary dysfunction) appear to be similar between these alternative approaches and the open surgical approach.[164]Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;(9):CD009625. http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28895658?tool=bestpractice.com [165]Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1051-60. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30017351?tool=bestpractice.com
Radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localised prostate cancer that was not detected through PSA screening improves prostate cancer-specific mortality, overall survival, and risk of local disease progression and metastasis, compared with active surveillance.[166]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 May 12;352(19):1977-84. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa043739 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15888698?tool=bestpractice.com [167]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Filen F, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Aug 20;100(16):1144-54. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2518167 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18695132?tool=bestpractice.com These benefits have been shown to continue over the long-term, particularly in those aged ≤65 years.[168]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):932-42. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118145 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24597866?tool=bestpractice.com [169]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in prostate cancer - 29-year follow-up. N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 13;379(24):2319-29. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1807801 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30575473?tool=bestpractice.com
Radical prostatectomy in men with PSA-detected localised prostate cancer does not significantly reduce all-cause mortality or prostate cancer-specific mortality, compared with active surveillance or observation.[170]Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3429335
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808955?tool=bestpractice.com
[171]Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-24.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1606220#t=article
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27626136?tool=bestpractice.com
[172]Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ, et al. Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 13;377(2):132-42.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1615869
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700844?tool=bestpractice.com
[173]Neal DE, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, et al. Ten-year mortality, disease progression, and treatment-related side effects in men with localised prostate cancer from the ProtecT randomised controlled trial according to treatment received. Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):320-30.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283819308371
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31771797?tool=bestpractice.com
Furthermore, radical prostatectomy is associated with a higher frequency of adverse events than active surveillance and observation.[170]Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3429335
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808955?tool=bestpractice.com
[171]Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-24.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1606220#t=article
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27626136?tool=bestpractice.com
[172]Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ, et al. Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 13;377(2):132-42.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1615869
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700844?tool=bestpractice.com
[173]Neal DE, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, et al. Ten-year mortality, disease progression, and treatment-related side effects in men with localised prostate cancer from the ProtecT randomised controlled trial according to treatment received. Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):320-30.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283819308371
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31771797?tool=bestpractice.com
[174]Vernooij RW, Lancee M, Cleves A, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 4;6(6):CD006590.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006590.pub3/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32495338?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
How does radical prostatectomy compare with deferred treatment for people with localized prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.3248/fullShow me the answer
unfavourable intermediate-risk disease
observation
For unfavourable intermediate-risk disease, patients have no high-risk or very high-risk features and one or more of the following: two or three intermediate risk factors (cT2b-c tumour; Grade Group 2 or 3; and/or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 10-20 micrograms/L [10-20 nanograms/mL]); and/or Grade Group 3 alone; and/or percentage of positive biopsy cores ≥50%.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
The treatment option for patients with unfavourable intermediate-risk disease and life expectancy ≤5 years is observation.
Observation involves monitoring the course of the disease with a view to delivering treatment or palliative therapy when symptoms arise or when there is a change in clinical findings that suggest symptoms are imminent.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Observation should include a history and physical examination no more often than every 12 months (without prostate biopsies).[145]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part I - introduction, risk assessment, staging, and risk-based management. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):10-8. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002757 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536144?tool=bestpractice.com If patients become symptomatic, assessment should be performed (including prostate-specific antigen [PSA] and PSA doubling time, life expectancy estimate, and quality-of-life measures) to determine need for, and consideration of, treatment or palliation.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
androgen deprivation therapy alone (if symptomatic)
Patients with life expectancy ≤5 years who become symptomatic during observation can receive androgen deprivation therapy alone for palliation (e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
leuprorelin
OR
goserelin
OR
degarelix
OR
relugolix
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and the bisphosphonates zoledronic acid and alendronic acid are recommended to reduce the risk of bone fractures in patients with non-metastatic disease if they are receiving ADT and have osteoporosis (e.g., T score -2.5 on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] scan) or an increased risk of fractures (e.g., ≥20% for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fractures, or ≥3% for 10-year risk of hip fractures, based on FRAX® [Fracture Risk Assessment Tool]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [360]Alibhai SMH, Zukotynski K, Walker-Dilks C, et al. Bone health and bone-targeted therapies for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 5;167(5):341-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785760?tool=bestpractice.com [361]Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, et al. Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2916-46. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01696 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532726?tool=bestpractice.com University of Sheffield: FRAX tool Opens in new window
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
observation
For unfavourable intermediate-risk disease, patients have no high-risk or very high-risk features and one or more of the following: two or three intermediate risk factors (cT2b-c tumour; Grade Group 2 or 3; and/or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 10-20 micrograms/L [10-20 nanograms/mL]), and/or Grade Group 3 alone, and/or percentage of positive biopsy cores ≥50%.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
There is no standard approach to managing patients with intermediate-risk disease. Few randomised trials have compared effectiveness between primary treatments.[180]Wilt TJ, MacDonald R, Rutks I, et al. Systematic review: comparative effectiveness and harms of treatments for clinically localized prostate cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Mar 18;148(6):435-48. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18252677?tool=bestpractice.com Adverse effects of treatment may influence treatment choice.[182]Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Graham JD, et al. Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):475-87. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17482880?tool=bestpractice.com [183]Potosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, et al. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Sep 15;96(18):1358-67. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh259 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15367568?tool=bestpractice.com [184]Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12):1250-61. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa074311 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18354103?tool=bestpractice.com [185]Wolff RF, Ryder S, Bossi A, et al. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(16):2345-67. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.019 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26254809?tool=bestpractice.com Brachytherapy may be associated with worse short-term urinary obstruction and irritation, and external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with worse bowel function and short-term bowel symptoms.[187]Chen RC, Basak R, Meyer AM, et al. Association between choice of radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or active surveillance and patient-reported quality of life among men with localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 2017 Mar 21;317(11):1141-50. https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.1652 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28324092?tool=bestpractice.com [189]Lane JA, Donovan JL, Young GJ, et al. Functional and quality of life outcomes of localised prostate cancer treatments (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment [ProtecT] study). BJU Int. 2022 Sep;130(3):370-80. https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.15739 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35373443?tool=bestpractice.com [190]Lardas M, Liew M, van den Bergh RC, et al. Quality of life outcomes after primary treatment for clinically localised prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. 2017 Dec;72(6):869-85. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0302283817305353?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28757301?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with unfavourable intermediate-risk disease and life expectancy 5-10 years can delay definitive treatments (e.g., EBRT or brachytherapy) and undergo observation instead, depending on the patient's wish to avoid treatment-related adverse effects.[182]Dearnaley DP, Sydes MR, Graham JD, et al. Escalated-dose versus standard-dose conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: first results from the MRC RT01 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007 Jun;8(6):475-87. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17482880?tool=bestpractice.com [183]Potosky AL, Davis WW, Hoffman RM, et al. Five-year outcomes after prostatectomy or radiotherapy for prostate cancer: the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Sep 15;96(18):1358-67. https://www.doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh259 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15367568?tool=bestpractice.com [184]Sanda MG, Dunn RL, Michalski J, et al. Quality of life and satisfaction with outcome among prostate-cancer survivors. N Engl J Med. 2008 Mar 20;358(12):1250-61. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa074311 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18354103?tool=bestpractice.com [185]Wolff RF, Ryder S, Bossi A, et al. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials of radiotherapy for localised prostate cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Nov;51(16):2345-67. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2015.07.019 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26254809?tool=bestpractice.com
Observation involves monitoring the course of the disease with a view to delivering treatment or palliative therapy when symptoms arise or when there is a change in clinical findings that suggest symptoms are imminent.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Observation should include a history and physical examination no more often than every 12 months (without prostate biopsies).[145]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part I - introduction, risk assessment, staging, and risk-based management. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):10-8. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002757 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536144?tool=bestpractice.com If patients become symptomatic, assessment should be performed (including prostate-specific antigen [PSA] and PSA doubling time, life expectancy estimate, and quality-of-life measures) to determine need for, and consideration of, treatment or palliation.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
external beam radiotherapy ± brachytherapy boost
For unfavourable intermediate-risk disease, patients have no high-risk or very high-risk features and one or more of the following: two or three intermediate risk factors (cT2b-c tumour; Grade Group 2 or 3; and/or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 10-20 micrograms/L [10-20 nanograms/mL]), and/or Grade Group 3 alone, and/or percentage of positive biopsy cores ≥50%.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without brachytherapy boost plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a treatment option for patients with unfavourable intermediate-risk disease and life expectancy 5-10 years.
EBRT and brachytherapy are definitive treatments. The treatment goal is cure.
Conventional fractionated EBRT typically employs daily doses of 1.8 to 2 Gy for 7-9 weeks (excluding weekends) to a total dose of 75.6 to 80 Gy. However, data suggest that hypofractionation (i.e., shorter treatment courses over 4-6 weeks using larger daily doses [>2-4 Gy], but smaller total doses [56-72 Gy]) may yield equivalent results to conventional fractionation.[151]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462.
https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
[152]Avkshtol V, Ruth KJ, Ross EA, et al. Ten-year update of a randomized, prospective trial of conventional fractionated versus moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15):1676-84.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238488
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32119599?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
How does hypofractionation compare with conventional fractionation radiotherapy for men with clinically localized prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2806/fullShow me the answer
Hypofractionation is now the preferred approach.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com Although it shortens treatment duration, it may slightly increase the risk of acute gastrointestinal adverse effects compared with conventional fractionation.[151]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
Ultra-hypofractionation may be considered for patients with localised disease, low metastatic burden disease, or oligometastatic disease.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com [154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com [155]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: an ASTRO, ASCO, and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 11;36(34):JCO1801097. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269129 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30307776?tool=bestpractice.com [156]Brand DH, Tree AC, Ostler P, et al. Intensity-modulated fractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): acute toxicity findings from an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1531-43. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838670 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31540791?tool=bestpractice.com [157]Widmark A, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L, et al. Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):385-95. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31227373?tool=bestpractice.com [158]Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2353-66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269599 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355464?tool=bestpractice.com [159]Phillips R, Shi WY, Deek M, et al. Outcomes of observation vs stereotactic ablative radiation for oligometastatic prostate cancer: the ORIOLE phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020 May 1;6(5):650-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225913 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215577?tool=bestpractice.com [160]Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligometastatic cancers: long-term results of the SABR-COMET phase II randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;38(25):2830-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460150 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32484754?tool=bestpractice.com A commonly used dosing schedule for ultra-hypofractionation is 7.25 Gy given every other day for 2 weeks (excluding weekends) to a total dose of 36.25 Gy.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com Other ultra-hypofractionation schedules ranging from 4-9 fractions of 5-10 Gy to a total dose of 36.25 to 50 Gy have been reported.[154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com Studies suggest comparable biochemical control and toxicity with ultra-hypofractionation versus more protracted fractionation schedules, but higher total doses are associated with a greater risk of severe late genitourinary complications.[154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy are the standard EBRT techniques because they allow for a highly conformal delivery of radiation that minimises dose to normal tissues (bladder, rectum, and small bowel), thereby potentially decreasing toxicity to these structures. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is the technique used to deliver ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy.
Biocompatible and biodegradable perirectal spacer materials can be implanted between the prostate and rectum in patients with organ-confined disease to reduce toxicity to the rectum.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [149]Miller LE, Efstathiou JA, Bhattacharyya SK, et al. Association of the placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer with the clinical outcomes of men receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208221. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2767246 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585020?tool=bestpractice.com [150]Hamstra DA, Mariados N, Sylvester J, et al. Continued benefit to rectal separation for prostate radiation therapy: final results of a phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Apr 1;97(5):976-85. https://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360-3016(16)33598-2/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209443?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with significant baseline urinary symptoms may not be suitable for EBRT due to increased risk of urinary obstruction.
Brachytherapy boost may be added to EBRT using either the low-dose rate or high-dose rate approach, if there is concern about the ability to achieve local control with EBRT.[377]Yamada Y, Rogers L, Demanes DJ, et al. American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2012 Jan-Feb;11(1):20-32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22265435?tool=bestpractice.com
Low-dose rate brachytherapy involves the permanent transperineal implantation of radioactive sources into the prostate without any incision. The highest radiation dose is confined to the prostate and a small volume of surrounding tissue. The strength of radiation decreases over time, but low levels of radioactivity in the prostate will persist for 4-6 months depending on the half-life of the isotope used. Precautions should be taken in the short term to minimise close contact with pregnant women and small children.
High-dose rate brachytherapy involves the transperineal placement of treatment catheters through which an individual radioactive source is robotically placed temporarily at various dwell positions to achieve a conformal dose of radiation to the prostate. At the end of treatment, the catheters are removed. Treatment is repeated up to five times to achieve a curative dose to the prostate.
High-dose radiation to the prostate and periprostatic tissue is recommended for patients who are candidates for radiotherapy plus ADT.[201]Kuban DA, Tucker SL, Dong L, et al. Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):67-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17765406?tool=bestpractice.com [202]Zelefsky MJ, Leibel SA, Gaudin PB, et al. Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jun 1;41(3):491-500. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9635694?tool=bestpractice.com [203]Hanks GE, Hanlon AL, Schultheiss TE, et al. Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: five year outcomes, treatment optimization, and future directions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jun 1;41(3):501-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9635695?tool=bestpractice.com [204]Pollack A, Zagars GK, Starkschall G, et al. Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M.D. Anderson phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Aug 1;53(5):1097-105. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12128107?tool=bestpractice.com [205]Zietman AL, DeSilvio ML, Slater JD, et al. Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1233-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16160131?tool=bestpractice.com
Prophylactic pelvic nodal irradiation may also be considered in highly selected patients with intermediate-risk disease who are undergoing radiotherapy, but only if further risk assessment (e.g., nomograms, biomarker testing) indicates aggressive disease.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [206]Murthy V, Maitre P, Kannan S, et al. Prostate-only versus whole-pelvic radiation therapy in high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer (POP-RT): outcomes from phase III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 10;39(11):1234-42. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.20.03282 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33497252?tool=bestpractice.com
androgen deprivation therapy
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist) may be given before, during, and/or after EBRT, for a total of 4-6 months.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx ADT greater than 6 months duration is not recommended in patients with intermediate-risk disease.[191]Pilepich MV, Caplan R, Byhardt RW, et al. Phase III trial of androgen suppression using goserelin in unfavorable-prognosis carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy: Report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 85-31. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):1013-21. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9060541?tool=bestpractice.com [192]Pilepich MV, Winter K, John MJ, et al. Phase III radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) trial 86-10 of androgen deprivation adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Aug 1;50(5):1243-52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11483335?tool=bestpractice.com
ADT may have multiple synergistic effects when combined with radiotherapy, and is associated with significant clinical benefit.[193]Roach M 3rd, DeSilvio M, Lawton C, et al. Phase III trial comparing whole-pelvic versus prostate-only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant versus adjuvant combined androgen suppression: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413. J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 15;21(10):1904-11. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12743142?tool=bestpractice.com [194]D'Amico AV, Manola J, Loffredo M, et al. 6-month androgen suppression plus radiation therapy vs radiation therapy alone for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004 Aug 18;292(7):821-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15315996?tool=bestpractice.com [195]Bolla M, Maingon P, Carrie C, et al. Short androgen suppression and radiation dose escalation for intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer: results of EORTC trial 22991. J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 20;34(15):1748-56. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26976418?tool=bestpractice.com [196]Shelley MD, Kumar S, Wilt T, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials of neo-adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Feb;35(1):9-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18926640?tool=bestpractice.com [197]Locke JA, Dal Pra A, Supiot S, et al. Synergistic action of image-guided radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy. Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Apr;12(4):193-204. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2015.50 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25800395?tool=bestpractice.com [198]D'Amico AV, Chen MH, Renshaw AA, et al. Risk of prostate cancer recurrence in men treated with radiation alone or in conjunction with combined or less than combined androgen suppression therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 20;26(18):2979-83. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.9699 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18565884?tool=bestpractice.com [199]Jones CU, Hunt D, McGowan DG, et al. Radiotherapy and short-term androgen deprivation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 14;365(2):107-18. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1012348 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21751904?tool=bestpractice.com [200]Bolla M, Neven A, Maingon P, et al. Short androgen suppression and radiation dose escalation in prostate cancer: 12-year results of EORTC trial 22991 in patients with localized intermediate-risk disease. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 20;39(27):3022-33. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.21.00855 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34310202?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
leuprorelin
OR
goserelin
OR
degarelix
OR
relugolix
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and the bisphosphonates zoledronic acid and alendronic acid are recommended to reduce the risk of bone fractures in patients with non-metastatic disease if they are receiving ADT and have osteoporosis (e.g., T score -2.5 on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] scan) or an increased risk of fractures (e.g., ≥20% for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fractures, or ≥3% for 10-year risk of hip fractures, based on FRAX® [Fracture Risk Assessment Tool]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [360]Alibhai SMH, Zukotynski K, Walker-Dilks C, et al. Bone health and bone-targeted therapies for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 5;167(5):341-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785760?tool=bestpractice.com [361]Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, et al. Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2916-46. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01696 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532726?tool=bestpractice.com University of Sheffield: FRAX tool Opens in new window
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
external beam radiotherapy ± brachytherapy boost
For unfavourable intermediate-risk disease, patients have no high-risk or very high-risk features and one or more of the following: two or three intermediate risk factors (cT2b-c tumour; Grade Group 2 or 3; and/or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 10-20 micrograms/L [10-20 nanograms/mL]), and/or Grade Group 3 alone, and/or percentage of positive biopsy cores ≥50%.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without brachytherapy boost plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a treatment option for patients with unfavourable intermediate-risk disease and life expectancy >10 years.
EBRT and brachytherapy are definitive treatments. The treatment goal is cure.
Conventional fractionated EBRT typically employs daily doses of 1.8 to 2 Gy for 7-9 weeks (excluding weekends) to a total dose of 75.6 to 80 Gy. However, data suggest that hypofractionation (i.e., shorter treatment courses over 4-6 weeks using larger daily doses [>2-4 Gy], but smaller total doses [56-72 Gy]) may yield equivalent results to conventional fractionation.[151]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462.
https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
[152]Avkshtol V, Ruth KJ, Ross EA, et al. Ten-year update of a randomized, prospective trial of conventional fractionated versus moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15):1676-84.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238488
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32119599?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
How does hypofractionation compare with conventional fractionation radiotherapy for men with clinically localized prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2806/fullShow me the answer
Hypofractionation is now the preferred approach.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com Although it shortens treatment duration, it may slightly increase the risk of acute gastrointestinal adverse effects compared with conventional fractionation.[151]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
Ultra-hypofractionation may be considered for patients with localised disease, low metastatic burden disease, or oligometastatic disease.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com [154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com [155]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: an ASTRO, ASCO, and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 11;36(34):JCO1801097. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269129 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30307776?tool=bestpractice.com [156]Brand DH, Tree AC, Ostler P, et al. Intensity-modulated fractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): acute toxicity findings from an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1531-43. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838670 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31540791?tool=bestpractice.com [157]Widmark A, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L, et al. Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):385-95. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31227373?tool=bestpractice.com [158]Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2353-66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269599 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355464?tool=bestpractice.com [159]Phillips R, Shi WY, Deek M, et al. Outcomes of observation vs stereotactic ablative radiation for oligometastatic prostate cancer: the ORIOLE phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020 May 1;6(5):650-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225913 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215577?tool=bestpractice.com [160]Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligometastatic cancers: long-term results of the SABR-COMET phase II randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;38(25):2830-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460150 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32484754?tool=bestpractice.com A commonly used dosing schedule for ultra-hypofractionation is 7.25 Gy given every other day for 2 weeks (excluding weekends) to a total dose of 36.25 Gy.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com Other ultra-hypofractionation schedules ranging from 4-9 fractions of 5-10 Gy to a total dose of 36.25 to 50 Gy have been reported.[154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com Studies suggest comparable biochemical control and toxicity with ultra-hypofractionation versus more protracted fractionation schedules, but higher total doses are associated with a greater risk of severe late genitourinary complications.[154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy are the standard EBRT techniques because they allow for a highly conformal delivery of radiation that minimises dose to normal tissues (bladder, rectum, and small bowel), thereby potentially decreasing toxicity to these structures. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is the technique used to deliver ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy.
Biocompatible and biodegradable perirectal spacer materials can be implanted between the prostate and rectum in patients with organ-confined disease to reduce toxicity to the rectum.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [149]Miller LE, Efstathiou JA, Bhattacharyya SK, et al. Association of the placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer with the clinical outcomes of men receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208221. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2767246 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585020?tool=bestpractice.com [150]Hamstra DA, Mariados N, Sylvester J, et al. Continued benefit to rectal separation for prostate radiation therapy: final results of a phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Apr 1;97(5):976-85. https://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360-3016(16)33598-2/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209443?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with significant baseline urinary symptoms may not be suitable for EBRT due to increased risk of urinary obstruction.
Brachytherapy boost may be added to EBRT, using either the low-dose rate or high-dose rate approach, if there is concern about the ability to achieve local control with EBRT.[377]Yamada Y, Rogers L, Demanes DJ, et al. American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2012 Jan-Feb;11(1):20-32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22265435?tool=bestpractice.com
Low-dose rate brachytherapy involves the permanent transperineal implantation of radioactive sources into the prostate without any incision. The highest radiation dose is confined to the prostate and a small volume of surrounding tissue. The strength of radiation decreases over time, but low levels of radioactivity in the prostate will persist for 4-6 months depending on the half-life of the isotope used. Precautions should be taken in the short term to minimise close contact with pregnant women and small children.
High-dose rate brachytherapy involves the transperineal placement of treatment catheters through which an individual radioactive source is robotically placed temporarily at various dwell positions to achieve a conformal dose of radiation to the prostate. At the end of treatment, the catheters are removed. Treatment is repeated up to five times to achieve a curative dose to the prostate.
High-dose radiation to the prostate and periprostatic tissue is recommended for patients who are candidates for radiotherapy plus ADT.[201]Kuban DA, Tucker SL, Dong L, et al. Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):67-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17765406?tool=bestpractice.com [202]Zelefsky MJ, Leibel SA, Gaudin PB, et al. Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jun 1;41(3):491-500. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9635694?tool=bestpractice.com [203]Hanks GE, Hanlon AL, Schultheiss TE, et al. Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: five year outcomes, treatment optimization, and future directions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jun 1;41(3):501-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9635695?tool=bestpractice.com [204]Pollack A, Zagars GK, Starkschall G, et al. Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M.D. Anderson phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Aug 1;53(5):1097-105. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12128107?tool=bestpractice.com [205]Zietman AL, DeSilvio ML, Slater JD, et al. Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1233-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16160131?tool=bestpractice.com
Prophylactic pelvic nodal irradiation may also be considered in patients with intermediate-risk disease who are undergoing radiotherapy, but only if further risk assessment (e.g., nomograms, biomarker testing) indicates aggressive disease.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [206]Murthy V, Maitre P, Kannan S, et al. Prostate-only versus whole-pelvic radiation therapy in high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer (POP-RT): outcomes from phase III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 10;39(11):1234-42. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.20.03282 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33497252?tool=bestpractice.com
androgen deprivation therapy
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist) may be given before, during, and/or after EBRT, for a total of 4-6 months.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx ADT greater than 6 months duration is not recommended in patients with intermediate-risk disease.[191]Pilepich MV, Caplan R, Byhardt RW, et al. Phase III trial of androgen suppression using goserelin in unfavorable-prognosis carcinoma of the prostate treated with definitive radiotherapy: Report of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 85-31. J Clin Oncol. 1997 Mar;15(3):1013-21. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9060541?tool=bestpractice.com [192]Pilepich MV, Winter K, John MJ, et al. Phase III radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) trial 86-10 of androgen deprivation adjuvant to definitive radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2001 Aug 1;50(5):1243-52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11483335?tool=bestpractice.com
ADT may have multiple synergistic effects when combined with radiotherapy, and is associated with significant clinical benefit.[193]Roach M 3rd, DeSilvio M, Lawton C, et al. Phase III trial comparing whole-pelvic versus prostate-only radiotherapy and neoadjuvant versus adjuvant combined androgen suppression: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9413. J Clin Oncol. 2003 May 15;21(10):1904-11. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12743142?tool=bestpractice.com [194]D'Amico AV, Manola J, Loffredo M, et al. 6-month androgen suppression plus radiation therapy vs radiation therapy alone for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2004 Aug 18;292(7):821-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15315996?tool=bestpractice.com [195]Bolla M, Maingon P, Carrie C, et al. Short androgen suppression and radiation dose escalation for intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer: results of EORTC trial 22991. J Clin Oncol. 2016 May 20;34(15):1748-56. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26976418?tool=bestpractice.com [196]Shelley MD, Kumar S, Wilt T, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials of neo-adjuvant hormone therapy for localised and locally advanced prostate carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Feb;35(1):9-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18926640?tool=bestpractice.com [197]Locke JA, Dal Pra A, Supiot S, et al. Synergistic action of image-guided radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy. Nat Rev Urol. 2015 Apr;12(4):193-204. https://www.doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2015.50 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25800395?tool=bestpractice.com [198]D'Amico AV, Chen MH, Renshaw AA, et al. Risk of prostate cancer recurrence in men treated with radiation alone or in conjunction with combined or less than combined androgen suppression therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jun 20;26(18):2979-83. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.9699 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18565884?tool=bestpractice.com [199]Jones CU, Hunt D, McGowan DG, et al. Radiotherapy and short-term androgen deprivation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 14;365(2):107-18. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1012348 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21751904?tool=bestpractice.com [200]Bolla M, Neven A, Maingon P, et al. Short androgen suppression and radiation dose escalation in prostate cancer: 12-year results of EORTC trial 22991 in patients with localized intermediate-risk disease. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Sep 20;39(27):3022-33. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.21.00855 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34310202?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
leuprorelin
OR
goserelin
OR
degarelix
OR
relugolix
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and the bisphosphonates zoledronic acid and alendronic acid are recommended to reduce the risk of bone fractures in patients with non-metastatic disease if they are receiving ADT and have osteoporosis (e.g., T score -2.5 on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] scan) or an increased risk of fractures (e.g., ≥20% for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fractures, or ≥3% for 10-year risk of hip fractures, based on FRAX® [Fracture Risk Assessment Tool]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [360]Alibhai SMH, Zukotynski K, Walker-Dilks C, et al. Bone health and bone-targeted therapies for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 5;167(5):341-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785760?tool=bestpractice.com [361]Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, et al. Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2916-46. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01696 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532726?tool=bestpractice.com University of Sheffield: FRAX tool Opens in new window
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
radical prostatectomy + lymph node dissection
For unfavourable intermediate-risk disease, patients have no high-risk or very high-risk features and one or more of the following: two or three intermediate risk factors (cT2b-c tumour; Grade Group 2 or 3; and/or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] 10-20 micrograms/L [10-20 nanograms/mL]), and/or Grade Group 3 alone, and/or percentage of positive biopsy cores ≥50%.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Radical prostatectomy is a treatment option for patients with unfavourable intermediate-risk disease and life expectancy >10 years (depending on patient preference and suitability for surgery). Pelvic lymph node dissection is also recommended.
Radical prostatectomy is a definitive treatment. The treatment goal is cure.
Classically, the prostate and prostatic capsule are removed by excision of the urethra at the prostatomembranous junction. The seminal vesicles, ampulla, and vas deferens are also removed. Of the two classic open surgical approaches (retropubic/suprapubic and perineal), the retropubic/suprapubic approach is preferred by many urologists, as this approach facilitates access for pelvic lymph node dissection.
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy are alternative approaches that typically involve five or six small incisions in the abdomen from which the entire prostate is removed, theoretically sparing nerves more easily damaged by a retropubic/suprapubic approach.[162]Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22749852?tool=bestpractice.com [163]Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):418-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22749850?tool=bestpractice.com A Cochrane review found that laparoscopic or robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy may result in shorter hospital stays and fewer blood transfusions compared with open surgical radical prostatectomy, but improvements in oncological outcomes (e.g., recurrence or survival) were inconclusive.[164]Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;(9):CD009625. http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28895658?tool=bestpractice.com Complications (e.g., sexual and urinary dysfunction) appear to be similar between these alternative approaches and the open surgical approach.[164]Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;(9):CD009625. http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28895658?tool=bestpractice.com [165]Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1051-60. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30017351?tool=bestpractice.com
Radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localised prostate cancer that was not detected through PSA screening improves prostate cancer-specific mortality, overall survival, and risk of local disease progression and metastasis, compared with active surveillance.[166]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 May 12;352(19):1977-84. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa043739 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15888698?tool=bestpractice.com [167]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Filen F, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Aug 20;100(16):1144-54. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2518167 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18695132?tool=bestpractice.com These benefits have been shown to continue over the long-term, particularly in those aged ≤65 years.[168]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):932-42. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118145 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24597866?tool=bestpractice.com [169]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in prostate cancer - 29-year follow-up. N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 13;379(24):2319-29. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1807801 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30575473?tool=bestpractice.com
Radical prostatectomy in men with PSA-detected localised prostate cancer does not significantly reduce all-cause mortality or prostate cancer-specific mortality, compared with active surveillance or observation.[170]Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3429335
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808955?tool=bestpractice.com
[171]Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-24.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1606220#t=article
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27626136?tool=bestpractice.com
[172]Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ, et al. Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 13;377(2):132-42.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1615869
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700844?tool=bestpractice.com
[173]Neal DE, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, et al. Ten-year mortality, disease progression, and treatment-related side effects in men with localised prostate cancer from the ProtecT randomised controlled trial according to treatment received. Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):320-30.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283819308371
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31771797?tool=bestpractice.com
Furthermore, radical prostatectomy is associated with a higher frequency of adverse events than active surveillance and observation.[170]Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3429335
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808955?tool=bestpractice.com
[171]Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-24.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1606220#t=article
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27626136?tool=bestpractice.com
[172]Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ, et al. Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 13;377(2):132-42.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1615869
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700844?tool=bestpractice.com
[173]Neal DE, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, et al. Ten-year mortality, disease progression, and treatment-related side effects in men with localised prostate cancer from the ProtecT randomised controlled trial according to treatment received. Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):320-30.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283819308371
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31771797?tool=bestpractice.com
[174]Vernooij RW, Lancee M, Cleves A, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 4;6(6):CD006590.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006590.pub3/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32495338?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
How does radical prostatectomy compare with deferred treatment for people with localized prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.3248/fullShow me the answer
high-risk or very high-risk disease
observation
For high-risk disease, patients have no very high-risk features and one of the following high-risk features: cT3a tumour; Grade Group 4 or 5; or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 micrograms/L (>20 nanograms/mL).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
For very high-risk (locally advanced) disease, patients have at least one of the following: cT3b-cT4 tumour; primary Gleason pattern 5; ≥2 high-risk features; or >4 cores with Grade Group 4 or 5.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Observation is the usual approach for asymptomatic high-risk and very high-risk patients with life expectancy ≤5 years.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx However, androgen deprivation therapy or external beam radiotherapy may be considered if symptoms or complications (e.g., hydronephrosis) of untreated disease or metastases are expected within 5 years.
Observation involves monitoring the course of the disease with a view to delivering treatment or palliative therapy when symptoms aris, or when there is a change in clinical findings that suggest symptoms are imminent.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Observation should include a history and physical examination no more often than every 12 months (without prostate biopsies).[145]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part I - introduction, risk assessment, staging, and risk-based management. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):10-8. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002757 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536144?tool=bestpractice.com If patients become symptomatic, assessment should be performed (including prostate-specific antigen [PSA] and PSA doubling time, life expectancy estimate, and quality-of-life measures) to determine need for, and consideration of, treatment or palliation.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
androgen deprivation therapy alone
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone (e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist) can be considered instead of observation in asymptomatic high-risk and very high-risk patients with life expectancy ≤5 years if symptoms or complications (e.g., hydronephrosis) of untreated disease or metastases are expected within 5 years.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
ADT on an intermittent rather than a continuous basis may be considered, although whether this approach has a positive impact on quality of life is controversial.[227]Crook JM, O'Callaghan CJ, Duncan G, et al. Intermittent androgen suppression for rising PSA level after radiotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 6;367(10):895-903. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3521033 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22931259?tool=bestpractice.com [228]Henselmans I, Smets EM, Van Laarhoven HW. Decision making about treatment for advanced cancer: influencing wisely? JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1169. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26562421?tool=bestpractice.com [229]Schulman C, Cornel E, Matveev V, et al. Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation therapy in patients with relapsing or locally advanced prostate cancer: a phase 3b randomised study (ICELAND). Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):720-7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030228381500977X http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26520703?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
leuprorelin
OR
goserelin
OR
degarelix
OR
relugolix
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and the bisphosphonates zoledronic acid and alendronic acid are recommended to reduce the risk of bone fractures in patients with non-metastatic disease if they are receiving ADT and have osteoporosis (e.g., T score -2.5 on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] scan) or an increased risk of fractures (e.g., ≥20% for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fractures, or ≥3% for 10-year risk of hip fractures, based on FRAX® [Fracture Risk Assessment Tool]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [360]Alibhai SMH, Zukotynski K, Walker-Dilks C, et al. Bone health and bone-targeted therapies for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 5;167(5):341-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785760?tool=bestpractice.com [361]Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, et al. Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2916-46. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01696 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532726?tool=bestpractice.com University of Sheffield: FRAX tool Opens in new window
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
external beam radiotherapy
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) can be considered instead of observation in asymptomatic high-risk and very high-risk patients with life expectancy ≤5 years if symptoms or complications (e.g., hydronephrosis) of untreated disease or metastases are expected within 5 years.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
EBRT is a definitive treatment. The treatment goal is cure.
Conventional fractionated EBRT typically employs daily doses of 1.8 to 2 Gy for 7-9 weeks (excluding weekends) to a total dose of 75.6 to 80 Gy. However, data suggest that hypofractionation (i.e., shorter treatment courses over 4-6 weeks using larger daily doses [>2-4 Gy], but smaller total doses [56-72 Gy]) may yield equivalent results to conventional fractionation.[151]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462.
https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
[152]Avkshtol V, Ruth KJ, Ross EA, et al. Ten-year update of a randomized, prospective trial of conventional fractionated versus moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15):1676-84.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238488
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32119599?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
How does hypofractionation compare with conventional fractionation radiotherapy for men with clinically localized prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2806/fullShow me the answer
Hypofractionation is now the preferred approach.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com Although it shortens treatment duration, it may slightly increase the risk of acute gastrointestinal adverse effects compared with conventional fractionation.[151]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
Ultra-hypofractionation may be considered for patients with localised disease, low metastatic burden disease, or oligometastatic disease.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com [154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com [155]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: an ASTRO, ASCO, and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 11;36(34):JCO1801097. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269129 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30307776?tool=bestpractice.com [156]Brand DH, Tree AC, Ostler P, et al. Intensity-modulated fractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): acute toxicity findings from an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1531-43. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838670 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31540791?tool=bestpractice.com [157]Widmark A, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L, et al. Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):385-95. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31227373?tool=bestpractice.com [158]Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2353-66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269599 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355464?tool=bestpractice.com [159]Phillips R, Shi WY, Deek M, et al. Outcomes of observation vs stereotactic ablative radiation for oligometastatic prostate cancer: the ORIOLE phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020 May 1;6(5):650-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225913 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215577?tool=bestpractice.com [160]Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligometastatic cancers: long-term results of the SABR-COMET phase II randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;38(25):2830-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460150 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32484754?tool=bestpractice.com A commonly used dosing schedule for ultra-hypofractionation is 7.25 Gy given every other day for 2 weeks (excluding weekends) to a total dose of 36.25 Gy.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com Other ultra-hypofractionation schedules ranging from 4-9 fractions of 5-10 Gy to a total dose of 36.25 to 50 Gy have been reported.[154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com Studies suggest comparable biochemical control and toxicity with ultra-hypofractionation versus more protracted fractionation schedules, but higher total doses are associated with a greater risk of severe late genitourinary complications.[154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy are the standard EBRT techniques because they allow for a highly conformal delivery of radiation that minimises dose to normal tissues (bladder, rectum, and small bowel), thereby potentially decreasing toxicity to these structures. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is the technique used to deliver ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy.
Prophylactic pelvic nodal irradiation should also be considered in patients with high-risk or very high-risk disease who are undergoing radiotherapy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [206]Murthy V, Maitre P, Kannan S, et al. Prostate-only versus whole-pelvic radiation therapy in high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer (POP-RT): outcomes from phase III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 10;39(11):1234-42. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.20.03282 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33497252?tool=bestpractice.com
Biocompatible and biodegradable perirectal spacer materials can be implanted between the prostate and rectum in patients with organ-confined disease to reduce toxicity to the rectum.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [149]Miller LE, Efstathiou JA, Bhattacharyya SK, et al. Association of the placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer with the clinical outcomes of men receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208221. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2767246 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585020?tool=bestpractice.com [150]Hamstra DA, Mariados N, Sylvester J, et al. Continued benefit to rectal separation for prostate radiation therapy: final results of a phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Apr 1;97(5):976-85. https://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360-3016(16)33598-2/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209443?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with significant baseline urinary symptoms may not be suitable for EBRT due to increased risk of urinary obstruction.
external beam radiotherapy ± brachytherapy boost
For high-risk disease, patients have no very high-risk features and one of the following high-risk features: cT3a tumour; Grade Group 4 or 5; or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 micrograms/L (>20 nanograms/mL).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
For very high-risk (locally advanced) disease, patients have at least one of the following: cT3b-cT4 tumour; primary Gleason pattern 5; ≥2 high-risk features; or >4 cores with Grade Group 4 or 5.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without brachytherapy boost plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a treatment option for patients with high-risk or very high-risk disease who are symptomatic or have a life expectancy >5 years.
EBRT and brachytherapy are definitive treatments. The treatment goal is cure.
Conventional fractionated EBRT typically employs daily doses of 1.8 to 2 Gy for 7-9 weeks (excluding weekends) to a total dose of 75.6 to 80 Gy. However, data suggest that hypofractionation (i.e., shorter treatment courses over 4-6 weeks using larger daily doses [>2-4 Gy], but smaller total doses [56-72 Gy]) may yield equivalent results to conventional fractionation.[151]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462.
https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
[152]Avkshtol V, Ruth KJ, Ross EA, et al. Ten-year update of a randomized, prospective trial of conventional fractionated versus moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15):1676-84.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238488
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32119599?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
How does hypofractionation compare with conventional fractionation radiotherapy for men with clinically localized prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2806/fullShow me the answer
Hypofractionation is now the preferred approach.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com Although it shortens treatment duration, it may slightly increase the risk of acute gastrointestinal adverse effects compared with conventional fractionation.[151]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
Ultra-hypofractionation may be considered for patients with localised disease, low metastatic burden disease, or oligometastatic disease.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com [154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com [155]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: an ASTRO, ASCO, and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 11;36(34):JCO1801097. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269129 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30307776?tool=bestpractice.com [156]Brand DH, Tree AC, Ostler P, et al. Intensity-modulated fractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): acute toxicity findings from an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1531-43. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838670 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31540791?tool=bestpractice.com [157]Widmark A, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L, et al. Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):385-95. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31227373?tool=bestpractice.com [158]Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2353-66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269599 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355464?tool=bestpractice.com [159]Phillips R, Shi WY, Deek M, et al. Outcomes of observation vs stereotactic ablative radiation for oligometastatic prostate cancer: the ORIOLE phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020 May 1;6(5):650-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225913 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215577?tool=bestpractice.com [160]Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligometastatic cancers: long-term results of the SABR-COMET phase II randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;38(25):2830-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460150 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32484754?tool=bestpractice.com A commonly used dosing schedule for ultra-hypofractionation is 7.25 Gy given every other day for 2 weeks (excluding weekends) to a total dose of 36.25 Gy.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com Other ultra-hypofractionation schedules ranging from 4-9 fractions of 5-10 Gy to a total dose of 36.25 to 50 Gy have been reported.[154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com Studies suggest comparable biochemical control and toxicity with ultra-hypofractionation versus more protracted fractionation schedules, but higher total doses are associated with a greater risk of severe late genitourinary complications.[154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy are the standard EBRT techniques because they allow for a highly conformal delivery of radiation that minimises dose to normal tissues (bladder, rectum, and small bowel), thereby potentially decreasing toxicity to these structures. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is the technique used to deliver ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy.
Biocompatible and biodegradable perirectal spacer materials can be implanted between the prostate and rectum in patients with organ-confined disease to reduce toxicity to the rectum.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [149]Miller LE, Efstathiou JA, Bhattacharyya SK, et al. Association of the placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer with the clinical outcomes of men receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208221. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2767246 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585020?tool=bestpractice.com [150]Hamstra DA, Mariados N, Sylvester J, et al. Continued benefit to rectal separation for prostate radiation therapy: final results of a phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Apr 1;97(5):976-85. https://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360-3016(16)33598-2/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209443?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with significant baseline urinary symptoms may not be good candidates for EBRT due to increased risk of urinary obstruction.
Brachytherapy boost may be added to EBRT, using either the low-dose rate or high-dose rate approach, if there is concern about the ability to achieve local control with EBRT.[377]Yamada Y, Rogers L, Demanes DJ, et al. American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2012 Jan-Feb;11(1):20-32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22265435?tool=bestpractice.com
The addition of brachytherapy boost to EBRT (with or without ADT) may provide superior disease control compared with EBRT plus ADT for patients with high-risk or very high-risk disease.[224]Morris WJ, Tyldesley S, Rodda S, et al. Androgen suppression combined with elective nodal and dose escalated radiation therapy (the ASCENDE-RT Trial): an analysis of survival endpoints for a randomized trial comparing a low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost to a dose-escalated external beam boost for high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):275-85. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28262473?tool=bestpractice.com [225]Kishan AU, Cook RR, Ciezki JP, et al. Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, or external beam radiotherapy with brachytherapy boost and disease progression and mortality in patients with Gleason score 9-10 Prostate Cancer. JAMA. 2018 Mar 6;319(9):896-905. https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.0587 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29509865?tool=bestpractice.com [226]Ennis RD, Hu L, Ryemon SN, et al. Brachytherapy-based radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy are associated with similar survival in high-risk localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 20;36(12):1192-8. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.9134 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29489433?tool=bestpractice.com
Low-dose rate brachytherapy involves the permanent transperineal implantation of radioactive sources into the prostate without any incision. The highest radiation dose is confined to the prostate and a small volume of surrounding tissue. The strength of radiation decreases over time, but low levels of radioactivity in the prostate will persist for 4-6 months depending on the half-life of the isotope used. Precautions should be taken in the short term to minimise close contact with pregnant women and small children.
High-dose rate brachytherapy involves the transperineal placement of treatment catheters through which an individual radioactive source is robotically placed temporarily at various dwell positions to achieve a conformal dose of radiation to the prostate. At the end of treatment, the catheters are removed. Treatment is repeated up to five times to achieve a curative dose to the prostate.
High-dose radiation to the prostate and periprostatic tissue is recommended for patients who are candidates for radiotherapy plus ADT.[201]Kuban DA, Tucker SL, Dong L, et al. Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):67-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17765406?tool=bestpractice.com [202]Zelefsky MJ, Leibel SA, Gaudin PB, et al. Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jun 1;41(3):491-500. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9635694?tool=bestpractice.com [203]Hanks GE, Hanlon AL, Schultheiss TE, et al. Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: five year outcomes, treatment optimization, and future directions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jun 1;41(3):501-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9635695?tool=bestpractice.com [204]Pollack A, Zagars GK, Starkschall G, et al. Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M.D. Anderson phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Aug 1;53(5):1097-105. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12128107?tool=bestpractice.com [205]Zietman AL, DeSilvio ML, Slater JD, et al. Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1233-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16160131?tool=bestpractice.com
Prophylactic pelvic nodal irradiation should also be considered in patients with high-risk or very high-risk disease who are undergoing radiotherapy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [206]Murthy V, Maitre P, Kannan S, et al. Prostate-only versus whole-pelvic radiation therapy in high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer (POP-RT): outcomes from phase III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 10;39(11):1234-42. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.20.03282 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33497252?tool=bestpractice.com
androgen deprivation therapy
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist) may be given before, during, and/or after initiation of EBRT, for a total of 1.5 to 3 years.[207]Bolla M, Collette L, Blank L, et al. Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Jul 13;360(9327):103-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12126818?tool=bestpractice.com [208]Hanks GE, Pajak TF, Porter, et al. Phase III trial of long-term adjuvant androgen deprivation after neoadjuvant hormonal cytoreduction and radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate: the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 92-02. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Nov 1;21(21):3972-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14581419?tool=bestpractice.com [209]Bolla M, de Reijke TM, Van Tienhoven G, et al. Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 11;360(24):2516-27. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19516032?tool=bestpractice.com [210]Horwitz EM, Bae K, Hanks GE, et al. Ten-year follow-up of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 92-02: a phase III trial of the duration of elective androgen deprivation in locally advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 20;26(15):2497-504. http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/26/15/2497.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18413638?tool=bestpractice.com [211]Zapatero A, Guerrero A, Maldonado X, et al. High-dose radiotherapy with short-term or long-term androgen deprivation in localised prostate cancer (DART01/05 GICOR): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):320-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25702876?tool=bestpractice.com [212]Denham JW, Joseph D, Lamb DS, et al. Short-term androgen suppression and radiotherapy versus intermediate-term androgen suppression and radiotherapy, with or without zoledronic acid, in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (TROG 03.04 RADAR): 10-year results from a randomised, phase 3, factorial trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):267-81. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30579763?tool=bestpractice.com [213]Nabid A, Carrier N, Martin AG, et al. Duration of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Trial. Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):432-441. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.018 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29980331?tool=bestpractice.com [214]Malone S, Roy S, Eapen L, et al. Sequencing of androgen-deprivation therapy with external-beam radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer: a phase III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 20;38(6):593-601. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186584 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829912?tool=bestpractice.com
The optimal duration of ADT for these patients remains controversial.[215]Fosså SD, Wiklund F, Klepp O, et al. Ten- and 15-yr prostate cancer-specific mortality in patients with nonmetastatic locally advanced or aggressive intermediate prostate cancer, randomized to lifelong endocrine treatment alone or combined with radiotherapy: final results of the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-7. Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):684-91. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27025586?tool=bestpractice.com A significant improvement in disease-free survival is demonstrated for a longer duration of ADT in patients with high-risk disease.[209]Bolla M, de Reijke TM, Van Tienhoven G, et al. Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 11;360(24):2516-27. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19516032?tool=bestpractice.com [215]Fosså SD, Wiklund F, Klepp O, et al. Ten- and 15-yr prostate cancer-specific mortality in patients with nonmetastatic locally advanced or aggressive intermediate prostate cancer, randomized to lifelong endocrine treatment alone or combined with radiotherapy: final results of the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-7. Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):684-91. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27025586?tool=bestpractice.com [216]Crook J, Ludgate C, Malone S, et al. Final report of multicenter Canadian phase III randomized trial of 3 versus 8 months of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy before conventional-dose radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Feb 1;73(2):327-33. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18707821?tool=bestpractice.com [217]Kishan AU, Wang X, Seiferheld W, et al. Association of Gleason grade with androgen deprivation therapy duration and survival autcomes: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jan 1;5(1):91-6. https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3732 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30326032?tool=bestpractice.com
Use of combined radiotherapy with ADT significantly increases some treatment-related symptoms (e.g., pain with urination and overall urinary and bowel bother), although none are serious. However, given the substantial survival benefit of combined treatment, the increased risk of symptoms seems acceptable and has little extra effect on quality of life after 4 years compared with ADT alone.[218]Fransson P, Lund JA, Damber JE, et al. Quality of life in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer given endocrine treatment with or without radiotherapy: 4-year follow-up of SPCG-7/SFUO-3, an open-label, randomised, phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Apr;10(4):370-80. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19286422?tool=bestpractice.com [219]Widmark A, Klepp O, Solberg A, et al. Endocrine treatment, with or without radiotherapy, in locally advanced prostate cancer (SPCG-7/SFUO-3): an open randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2009 Jan 24;373(9660):301-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19091394?tool=bestpractice.com [220]Verhagen PC, Schröder FH, Collette L, et al. Does local treatment of the prostate in advanced and/or lymph node metastatic disease improve efficacy of androgen-deprivation therapy? A systematic review. Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58(2):261-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20627403?tool=bestpractice.com [221]Brundage M, Sydes MR, Parulekar WR, et al. Impact of radiotherapy when added to androgen-deprivation therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: long-term quality-of-life outcomes from the NCIC CTG PR3/MRC PR07 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 1;33(19):2151-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477787 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26014295?tool=bestpractice.com [222]Mason MD, Parulekar WR, Sydes MR, et al. Final report of the intergroup randomized study of combined androgen-deprivation therapy plus radiotherapy versus androgen-deprivation therapy alone in locally advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 1;33(19):2143-50. http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/33/19/2143.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25691677?tool=bestpractice.com [223]Jackson WC, Hartman HE, Dess RT, et al. Addition of androgen-deprivation therapy or brachytherapy boost to external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 10;38(26):3024-31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8265327 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32396488?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
leuprorelin
OR
goserelin
OR
degarelix
OR
relugolix
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and the bisphosphonates zoledronic acid and alendronic acid are recommended to reduce the risk of bone fractures in patients with non-metastatic disease if they are receiving ADT and have osteoporosis (e.g., T score -2.5 on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] scan) or an increased risk of fractures (e.g., ≥20% for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fractures, or ≥3% for 10-year risk of hip fractures, based on FRAX® [Fracture Risk Assessment Tool]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [360]Alibhai SMH, Zukotynski K, Walker-Dilks C, et al. Bone health and bone-targeted therapies for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 5;167(5):341-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785760?tool=bestpractice.com [361]Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, et al. Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2916-46. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01696 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532726?tool=bestpractice.com University of Sheffield: FRAX tool Opens in new window
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
external beam radiotherapy ± brachytherapy boost
For very high-risk (locally advanced) disease, patients have at least one of the following: cT3b-cT4 tumour; primary Gleason pattern 5; ≥2 high-risk features; or >4 cores with Grade Group 4 or 5.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without brachytherapy boost combined with 2 years of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and abiraterone is recommended for selected patients with very high-risk (non-metastatic) disease (e.g., those with two or more of the following features: cT3 or cT4 tumour, PSA ≥40, and Grade Group 4 or 5).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
EBRT and brachytherapy are definitive treatments. The treatment goal is cure.
Conventional fractionated EBRT typically employs daily doses of 1.8 to 2.0 Gy for 7-9 weeks (excluding weekends) to a total dose of 75.6 to 80.0 Gy. However, data suggest that hypofractionation (i.e., shorter treatment courses over 4-6 weeks using larger daily doses [>2-4 Gy], but smaller total doses [56-72 Gy]) may yield equivalent results to conventional fractionation.[151]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462.
https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
[152]Avkshtol V, Ruth KJ, Ross EA, et al. Ten-year update of a randomized, prospective trial of conventional fractionated versus moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2020 May 20;38(15):1676-84.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7238488
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32119599?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
How does hypofractionation compare with conventional fractionation radiotherapy for men with clinically localized prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2806/fullShow me the answer
Hypofractionation is now the preferred approach.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com Although it shortens treatment duration, it may slightly increase the risk of acute gastrointestinal adverse effects compared with conventional fractionation.[151]Hickey BE, James ML, Daly T, et al. Hypofractionation for clinically localized prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 3;9:CD011462. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011462.pub2 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31476800?tool=bestpractice.com
Ultra-hypofractionation may be considered for patients with localised disease, low metastatic burden disease, or oligometastatic disease.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com [154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com [155]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: an ASTRO, ASCO, and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct 11;36(34):JCO1801097. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269129 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30307776?tool=bestpractice.com [156]Brand DH, Tree AC, Ostler P, et al. Intensity-modulated fractionated radiotherapy versus stereotactic body radiotherapy for prostate cancer (PACE-B): acute toxicity findings from an international, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1531-43. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6838670 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31540791?tool=bestpractice.com [157]Widmark A, Gunnlaugsson A, Beckman L, et al. Ultra-hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the HYPO-RT-PC randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019 Aug 3;394(10196):385-95. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31227373?tool=bestpractice.com [158]Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2353-66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269599 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355464?tool=bestpractice.com [159]Phillips R, Shi WY, Deek M, et al. Outcomes of observation vs stereotactic ablative radiation for oligometastatic prostate cancer: the ORIOLE phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020 May 1;6(5):650-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7225913 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32215577?tool=bestpractice.com [160]Palma DA, Olson R, Harrow S, et al. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for the comprehensive treatment of oligometastatic cancers: long-term results of the SABR-COMET phase II randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 1;38(25):2830-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7460150 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32484754?tool=bestpractice.com A commonly used dosing schedule for ultra-hypofractionation is 7.25 Gy given every other day for 2 weeks (excluding weekends) to a total dose of 36.25 Gy.[153]Morgan SC, Hoffman K, Loblaw DA, et al. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: executive summary of an ASTRO, ASCO and AUA evidence-based guideline. J Urol. 2019 Mar;201(3):528-34. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000000071 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30759696?tool=bestpractice.com Other ultra-hypofractionation schedules ranging from 4-9 fractions of 5-10 Gy to a total dose of 36.25 to 50.00 Gy have been reported.[154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com Studies suggest comparable biochemical control and toxicity with ultra-hypofractionation versus more protracted fractionation schedules, but higher total doses are associated with a greater risk of severe late genitourinary complications.[154]Jackson WC, Silva J, Hartman HE, et al. Stereotactic body radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of over 6,000 patients treated on prospective studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2019 Jul 15;104(4):778-89. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.03.051 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30959121?tool=bestpractice.com
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy are the standard EBRT techniques because they allow for a highly conformal delivery of radiation that minimises dose to normal tissues (bladder, rectum, and small bowel), thereby potentially decreasing toxicity to these structures. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is the technique used to deliver ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy.
Biocompatible and biodegradable perirectal spacer materials can be implanted between the prostate and rectum in patients with organ-confined disease to reduce toxicity to the rectum.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [149]Miller LE, Efstathiou JA, Bhattacharyya SK, et al. Association of the placement of a perirectal hydrogel spacer with the clinical outcomes of men receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Jun 1;3(6):e208221. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2767246 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32585020?tool=bestpractice.com [150]Hamstra DA, Mariados N, Sylvester J, et al. Continued benefit to rectal separation for prostate radiation therapy: final results of a phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Apr 1;97(5):976-85. https://www.redjournal.org/article/S0360-3016(16)33598-2/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28209443?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with significant baseline urinary symptoms may not be good candidates for EBRT due to increased risk of urinary obstruction.
Brachytherapy boost may be added to EBRT, using either the low-dose rate or high-dose rate approach, if there is concern about the ability to achieve local control with EBRT.[377]Yamada Y, Rogers L, Demanes DJ, et al. American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy. 2012 Jan-Feb;11(1):20-32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22265435?tool=bestpractice.com
The addition of brachytherapy boost to EBRT (with or without ADT) may provide superior disease control compared with EBRT plus ADT for patients with high-risk or very high-risk disease.[224]Morris WJ, Tyldesley S, Rodda S, et al. Androgen suppression combined with elective nodal and dose escalated radiation therapy (the ASCENDE-RT Trial): an analysis of survival endpoints for a randomized trial comparing a low-dose-rate brachytherapy boost to a dose-escalated external beam boost for high- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017 Jun 1;98(2):275-85. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28262473?tool=bestpractice.com [225]Kishan AU, Cook RR, Ciezki JP, et al. Radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, or external beam radiotherapy with brachytherapy boost and disease progression and mortality in patients with Gleason score 9-10 Prostate Cancer. JAMA. 2018 Mar 6;319(9):896-905. https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.0587 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29509865?tool=bestpractice.com [226]Ennis RD, Hu L, Ryemon SN, et al. Brachytherapy-based radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy are associated with similar survival in high-risk localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 20;36(12):1192-8. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.9134 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29489433?tool=bestpractice.com
Low-dose rate brachytherapy involves the permanent transperineal implantation of radioactive sources into the prostate without any incision. The highest radiation dose is confined to the prostate and a small volume of surrounding tissue. The strength of radiation decreases over time, but low levels of radioactivity in the prostate will persist for 4-6 months depending on the half-life of the isotope used. Precautions should be taken in the short term to minimise close contact with pregnant women and small children.
High-dose rate brachytherapy involves the transperineal placement of treatment catheters through which an individual radioactive source is robotically placed temporarily at various dwell positions to achieve a conformal dose of radiation to the prostate. At the end of treatment, the catheters are removed. Treatment is repeated up to five times to achieve a curative dose to the prostate.
High-dose radiation to the prostate and periprostatic tissue is recommended for patients who are candidates for radiotherapy plus ADT.[201]Kuban DA, Tucker SL, Dong L, et al. Long-term results of the M. D. Anderson randomized dose-escalation trial for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jan 1;70(1):67-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17765406?tool=bestpractice.com [202]Zelefsky MJ, Leibel SA, Gaudin PB, et al. Dose escalation with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy affects the outcome in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jun 1;41(3):491-500. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9635694?tool=bestpractice.com [203]Hanks GE, Hanlon AL, Schultheiss TE, et al. Dose escalation with 3D conformal treatment: five year outcomes, treatment optimization, and future directions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998 Jun 1;41(3):501-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9635695?tool=bestpractice.com [204]Pollack A, Zagars GK, Starkschall G, et al. Prostate cancer radiation dose response: results of the M.D. Anderson phase III trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Aug 1;53(5):1097-105. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12128107?tool=bestpractice.com [205]Zietman AL, DeSilvio ML, Slater JD, et al. Comparison of conventional-dose vs high-dose conformal radiation therapy in clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Sep 14;294(10):1233-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16160131?tool=bestpractice.com
Prophylactic pelvic nodal irradiation should also be considered in patients with high-risk or very high-risk disease who are undergoing radiotherapy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [206]Murthy V, Maitre P, Kannan S, et al. Prostate-only versus whole-pelvic radiation therapy in high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer (POP-RT): outcomes from phase III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Apr 10;39(11):1234-42. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.20.03282 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33497252?tool=bestpractice.com
androgen deprivation therapy + abiraterone (for very high-risk disease)
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonist or antagonist) may be given before, during, and/or after initiation of EBRT, for a total of 1.5 to 3 years.[207]Bolla M, Collette L, Blank L, et al. Long-term results with immediate androgen suppression and external irradiation in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer (an EORTC study): a phase III randomised trial. Lancet. 2002 Jul 13;360(9327):103-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12126818?tool=bestpractice.com [208]Hanks GE, Pajak TF, Porter, et al. Phase III trial of long-term adjuvant androgen deprivation after neoadjuvant hormonal cytoreduction and radiotherapy in locally advanced carcinoma of the prostate: the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Protocol 92-02. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Nov 1;21(21):3972-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14581419?tool=bestpractice.com [209]Bolla M, de Reijke TM, Van Tienhoven G, et al. Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 11;360(24):2516-27. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19516032?tool=bestpractice.com [210]Horwitz EM, Bae K, Hanks GE, et al. Ten-year follow-up of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 92-02: a phase III trial of the duration of elective androgen deprivation in locally advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008 May 20;26(15):2497-504. http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/26/15/2497.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18413638?tool=bestpractice.com [211]Zapatero A, Guerrero A, Maldonado X, et al. High-dose radiotherapy with short-term or long-term androgen deprivation in localised prostate cancer (DART01/05 GICOR): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Mar;16(3):320-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25702876?tool=bestpractice.com [212]Denham JW, Joseph D, Lamb DS, et al. Short-term androgen suppression and radiotherapy versus intermediate-term androgen suppression and radiotherapy, with or without zoledronic acid, in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (TROG 03.04 RADAR): 10-year results from a randomised, phase 3, factorial trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Feb;20(2):267-81. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30579763?tool=bestpractice.com [213]Nabid A, Carrier N, Martin AG, et al. Duration of Androgen Deprivation Therapy in High-risk Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Trial. Eur Urol. 2018 Oct;74(4):432-441. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.06.018 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29980331?tool=bestpractice.com [214]Malone S, Roy S, Eapen L, et al. Sequencing of androgen-deprivation therapy with external-beam radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer: a phase III randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 20;38(6):593-601. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186584 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31829912?tool=bestpractice.com
The optimal duration of ADT for these patients remains controversial.[215]Fosså SD, Wiklund F, Klepp O, et al. Ten- and 15-yr prostate cancer-specific mortality in patients with nonmetastatic locally advanced or aggressive intermediate prostate cancer, randomized to lifelong endocrine treatment alone or combined with radiotherapy: final results of the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-7. Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):684-91. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27025586?tool=bestpractice.com A significant improvement in disease-free survival is demonstrated for a longer duration of ADT in patients with high-risk disease.[209]Bolla M, de Reijke TM, Van Tienhoven G, et al. Duration of androgen suppression in the treatment of prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 11;360(24):2516-27. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19516032?tool=bestpractice.com [215]Fosså SD, Wiklund F, Klepp O, et al. Ten- and 15-yr prostate cancer-specific mortality in patients with nonmetastatic locally advanced or aggressive intermediate prostate cancer, randomized to lifelong endocrine treatment alone or combined with radiotherapy: final results of the Scandinavian Prostate Cancer Group-7. Eur Urol. 2016 Oct;70(4):684-91. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27025586?tool=bestpractice.com [216]Crook J, Ludgate C, Malone S, et al. Final report of multicenter Canadian phase III randomized trial of 3 versus 8 months of neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy before conventional-dose radiotherapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Feb 1;73(2):327-33. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18707821?tool=bestpractice.com [217]Kishan AU, Wang X, Seiferheld W, et al. Association of Gleason grade with androgen deprivation therapy duration and survival autcomes: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jan 1;5(1):91-6. https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.3732 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30326032?tool=bestpractice.com
Use of combined radiotherapy with ADT significantly increases some treatment-related symptoms (e.g., pain with urination and overall urinary and bowel bother), although none are serious. However, given the substantial survival benefit of combined treatment, the increased risk of symptoms seems acceptable and has little extra effect on quality of life after 4 years compared with ADT alone.[218]Fransson P, Lund JA, Damber JE, et al. Quality of life in patients with locally advanced prostate cancer given endocrine treatment with or without radiotherapy: 4-year follow-up of SPCG-7/SFUO-3, an open-label, randomised, phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Apr;10(4):370-80. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19286422?tool=bestpractice.com [219]Widmark A, Klepp O, Solberg A, et al. Endocrine treatment, with or without radiotherapy, in locally advanced prostate cancer (SPCG-7/SFUO-3): an open randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2009 Jan 24;373(9660):301-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19091394?tool=bestpractice.com [220]Verhagen PC, Schröder FH, Collette L, et al. Does local treatment of the prostate in advanced and/or lymph node metastatic disease improve efficacy of androgen-deprivation therapy? A systematic review. Eur Urol. 2010 Aug;58(2):261-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20627403?tool=bestpractice.com [221]Brundage M, Sydes MR, Parulekar WR, et al. Impact of radiotherapy when added to androgen-deprivation therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer: long-term quality-of-life outcomes from the NCIC CTG PR3/MRC PR07 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 1;33(19):2151-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4477787 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26014295?tool=bestpractice.com [222]Mason MD, Parulekar WR, Sydes MR, et al. Final report of the intergroup randomized study of combined androgen-deprivation therapy plus radiotherapy versus androgen-deprivation therapy alone in locally advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 1;33(19):2143-50. http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/33/19/2143.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25691677?tool=bestpractice.com [223]Jackson WC, Hartman HE, Dess RT, et al. Addition of androgen-deprivation therapy or brachytherapy boost to external beam radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 10;38(26):3024-31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8265327 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32396488?tool=bestpractice.com
Abiraterone (a second-generation anti-androgen) is approved for use in metastatic disease. However, off-label use in combination with EBRT and 2 years of ADT (e.g., an LHRH agonist or antagonist) is recommended for selected patients with very high-risk (non-metastatic) disease (e.g., those with two or more of the following features: cT3 or cT4 tumour, PSA ≥40, and Grade Group 4 or 5).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [230]James ND, de Bono JS, Spears MR, et al. Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):338-51. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533216 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578639?tool=bestpractice.com [231]Fizazi K, Gillessen S, ESMO Guidelines Committee. Updated treatment recommendations for prostate cancer from the ESMO clinical practice guideline considering treatment intensification and use of novel systemic agents. Ann Oncol. 2023 Jun;34(6):557-63. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.02.015 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36958590?tool=bestpractice.com
Abiraterone should not be used concurrently with another anti-androgen (e.g., nilutamide, bicalutamide, flutamide), and it should always be given with prednisolone or methylprednisolone (depending on the formulation of abiraterone).
The addition of abiraterone to primary ADT has been shown to improve overall and failure-free survival in a randomised study of men with locally advanced prostate cancer (radiotherapy was required if node negative, and encouraged if node positive) or metastatic disease.[230]James ND, de Bono JS, Spears MR, et al. Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):338-51. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533216 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578639?tool=bestpractice.com Overall survival data for the subgroup of patients with non-metastatic disease at randomisation are immature.[230]James ND, de Bono JS, Spears MR, et al. Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):338-51. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533216 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578639?tool=bestpractice.com However, there are data showing improved metastasis-free survival in this subgroup.[232]Attard G, Murphy L, Clarke NW, et al. Abiraterone acetate and prednisolone with or without enzalutamide for high-risk non-metastatic prostate cancer: a meta-analysis of primary results from two randomised controlled phase 3 trials of the STAMPEDE platform protocol. Lancet. 2022 Jan 29;399(10323):447-60. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8811484 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34953525?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
leuprorelin
or
goserelin
or
degarelix
or
relugolix
-- AND --
abiraterone acetate
More abiraterone acetateAdminister non-micronised formulation with prednisolone, and micronised formulation with methylprednisolone.
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and the bisphosphonates zoledronic acid and alendronic acid are recommended to reduce the risk of bone fractures in patients with non-metastatic disease if they are receiving ADT and have osteoporosis (e.g., T score -2.5 on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] scan) or an increased risk of fractures (e.g., ≥20% for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fractures, or ≥3% for 10-year risk of hip fractures, based on FRAX® [Fracture Risk Assessment Tool]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [360]Alibhai SMH, Zukotynski K, Walker-Dilks C, et al. Bone health and bone-targeted therapies for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 5;167(5):341-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785760?tool=bestpractice.com [361]Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, et al. Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2916-46. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01696 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532726?tool=bestpractice.com University of Sheffield: FRAX tool Opens in new window
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
radical prostatectomy + pelvic lymph node dissection (for fit patients without tumour fixation to the pelvic musculature or skeleton)
For high-risk disease, patients have no very high-risk features and one of the following high-risk features: cT3a tumour; Grade Group 4 or 5; or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >20 micrograms/L (>20 nanograms/mL).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
For very high-risk (locally advanced) disease, patients have at least one of the following: cT3b-cT4 tumour; primary Gleason pattern 5; ≥2 high-risk features; or >4 cores with Grade Group 4 or 5.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Radical prostatectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection is a treatment option for highly selected patients with high-risk or very high-risk disease who are symptomatic or have a life expectancy >5 years (e.g., fit patients without tumour fixation to the pelvic musculature or skeleton), depending on patient preference and suitability for surgery.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Radical prostatectomy is a definitive treatment. The treatment goal is cure.
Classically, the prostate and prostatic capsule are removed by excision of the urethra at the prostatomembranous junction. The seminal vesicles, ampulla, and vas deferens are also removed. Of the two classic open surgical approaches (retropubic/suprapubic and perineal), the retropubic/suprapubic approach is preferred by many urologists, as this approach facilitates access for pelvic lymph node dissection.
Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy are alternative approaches that typically involve five or six small incisions in the abdomen from which the entire prostate is removed, theoretically sparing nerves more easily damaged by a retropubic/suprapubic approach.[162]Ficarra V, Novara G, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting urinary continence recovery after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):405-17. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22749852?tool=bestpractice.com [163]Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012 Sep;62(3):418-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22749850?tool=bestpractice.com A Cochrane review found that laparoscopic or robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy may result in shorter hospital stays and fewer blood transfusions compared with open surgical radical prostatectomy, but improvements in oncological outcomes (e.g., recurrence or survival) were inconclusive.[164]Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;(9):CD009625. http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28895658?tool=bestpractice.com Complications (e.g., sexual and urinary dysfunction) appear to be similar between these alternative approaches and the open surgical approach.[164]Ilic D, Evans SM, Allan CA, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted versus open radical prostatectomy for the treatment of localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 12;(9):CD009625. http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD009625.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28895658?tool=bestpractice.com [165]Coughlin GD, Yaxley JW, Chambers SK, et al. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy versus open radical retropubic prostatectomy: 24-month outcomes from a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Aug;19(8):1051-60. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30017351?tool=bestpractice.com
Radical prostatectomy in men with clinically localised prostate cancer that was not detected through PSA screening improves prostate cancer-specific mortality, overall survival, and risk of local disease progression and metastasis, compared with active surveillance.[166]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Ruutu M, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 May 12;352(19):1977-84. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa043739 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15888698?tool=bestpractice.com [167]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Filen F, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus watchful waiting in localized prostate cancer: the Scandinavian prostate cancer group-4 randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Aug 20;100(16):1144-54. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2518167 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18695132?tool=bestpractice.com These benefits have been shown to continue over the long-term, particularly in those aged ≤65 years.[168]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014 Mar 6;370(10):932-42. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4118145 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24597866?tool=bestpractice.com [169]Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in prostate cancer - 29-year follow-up. N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 13;379(24):2319-29. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1807801 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30575473?tool=bestpractice.com
Radical prostatectomy in men with PSA-detected localised prostate cancer does not significantly reduce all-cause mortality or prostate cancer-specific mortality, compared with active surveillance or observation.[170]Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3429335
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808955?tool=bestpractice.com
[171]Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-24.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1606220#t=article
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27626136?tool=bestpractice.com
[172]Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ, et al. Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 13;377(2):132-42.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1615869
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700844?tool=bestpractice.com
[173]Neal DE, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, et al. Ten-year mortality, disease progression, and treatment-related side effects in men with localised prostate cancer from the ProtecT randomised controlled trial according to treatment received. Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):320-30.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283819308371
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31771797?tool=bestpractice.com
Furthermore, radical prostatectomy is associated with a higher frequency of adverse events than active surveillance and observation.[170]Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jul 19;367(3):203-13.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3429335
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22808955?tool=bestpractice.com
[171]Hamdy FC, Donovan JL, Lane JA, et al; ProtecT Study Group. 10-Year outcomes after monitoring, surgery, or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-24.
http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1606220#t=article
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27626136?tool=bestpractice.com
[172]Wilt TJ, Jones KM, Barry MJ, et al. Follow-up of prostatectomy versus observation for early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 13;377(2):132-42.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1615869
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28700844?tool=bestpractice.com
[173]Neal DE, Metcalfe C, Donovan JL, et al. Ten-year mortality, disease progression, and treatment-related side effects in men with localised prostate cancer from the ProtecT randomised controlled trial according to treatment received. Eur Urol. 2020 Mar;77(3):320-30.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283819308371
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31771797?tool=bestpractice.com
[174]Vernooij RW, Lancee M, Cleves A, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus deferred treatment for localised prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jun 4;6(6):CD006590.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006590.pub3/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32495338?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
How does radical prostatectomy compare with deferred treatment for people with localized prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.3248/fullShow me the answer
androgen deprivation therapy alone (for patients unsuitable for surgery or radiotherapy)
Where possible, patients with high-risk or very high-risk disease should receive definitive treatment.[219]Widmark A, Klepp O, Solberg A, et al. Endocrine treatment, with or without radiotherapy, in locally advanced prostate cancer (SPCG-7/SFUO-3): an open randomised phase III trial. Lancet. 2009 Jan 24;373(9660):301-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19091394?tool=bestpractice.com However, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone (e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist) may be an option for patients who are unsuitable for definitive treatment due to medical comorbidities (e.g., inflammatory bowel disease or prior pelvic irradiation).[222]Mason MD, Parulekar WR, Sydes MR, et al. Final report of the intergroup randomized study of combined androgen-deprivation therapy plus radiotherapy versus androgen-deprivation therapy alone in locally advanced prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jul 1;33(19):2143-50. http://jco.ascopubs.org/content/33/19/2143.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25691677?tool=bestpractice.com
ADT alone is not curative, but it may slow progression and help control symptoms.
ADT on an intermittent rather than a continuous basis may be considered, although whether this approach has a positive impact on quality of life is controversial.[227]Crook JM, O'Callaghan CJ, Duncan G, et al. Intermittent androgen suppression for rising PSA level after radiotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2012 Sep 6;367(10):895-903. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3521033 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22931259?tool=bestpractice.com [228]Henselmans I, Smets EM, Van Laarhoven HW. Decision making about treatment for advanced cancer: influencing wisely? JAMA Oncol. 2015 Nov;1(8):1169. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26562421?tool=bestpractice.com [229]Schulman C, Cornel E, Matveev V, et al. Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation therapy in patients with relapsing or locally advanced prostate cancer: a phase 3b randomised study (ICELAND). Eur Urol. 2016 Apr;69(4):720-7. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030228381500977X http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26520703?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
leuprorelin
OR
goserelin
OR
degarelix
OR
relugolix
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and the bisphosphonates zoledronic acid and alendronic acid are recommended to reduce the risk of bone fractures in patients with non-metastatic disease if they are receiving ADT and have osteoporosis (e.g., T score -2.5 on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] scan) or an increased risk of fractures (e.g., ≥20% for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fractures, or ≥3% for 10-year risk of hip fractures, based on FRAX® [Fracture Risk Assessment Tool]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [360]Alibhai SMH, Zukotynski K, Walker-Dilks C, et al. Bone health and bone-targeted therapies for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 5;167(5):341-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785760?tool=bestpractice.com [361]Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, et al. Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2916-46. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01696 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532726?tool=bestpractice.com University of Sheffield: FRAX tool Opens in new window
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
non-metastatic disease: post-radical prostatectomy
monitoring with early salvage external beam radiotherapy
For patients with life expectancy >5 years with adverse pathological or laboratory features (e.g., positive margins, extracapsular extension [pT3 disease], seminal vesicle invasion, or a detectable prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) and no lymph node metastases after radical prostatectomy, options include monitoring with consideration of early salvage external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for a detectable, rising PSA level or a PSA >0.1 micrograms/L (>0.1 nanograms/mL) (before PSA reaches 0.5 micrograms/L [0.5 nanograms/mL]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Risk assessment (including use of nomograms) should be carried out to inform decision-making in these patients. The Decipher molecular assay may also be considered to guide decision-making discussions, along with clinical and pathological information, PSA level, and PSA doubling time.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [234]Nguyen PL, Haddad Z, Ross AE, et al. Ability of a genomic classifier to predict metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality after radiation or surgery based on needle biopsy specimens. Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):845-52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283817303901 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28528811?tool=bestpractice.com [235]Spratt DE, Yousefi K, Deheshi S, et al. Individual patient-level meta-analysis of the performance of the decipher genomic classifier in high-risk men after prostatectomy to predict development of metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 20;35(18):1991-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530581 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28358655?tool=bestpractice.com [236]Marascio J, Spratt DE, Zhang J, et al. Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Jun;23(2):295-302. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237345 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719663?tool=bestpractice.com Shared decisions about treatment should be based on assessment of potential benefits and harms.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [146]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part II - principles of active surveillance, principles of surgery, and follow-up. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):19-25. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002758 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536148?tool=bestpractice.com
Monitoring, with early salvage EBRT performed only when PSA failure is detected, reduces overtreatment with radiotherapy (and associated adverse events) compared with immediate adjuvant EBRT. Monitoring is the preferred option, unless the patient has positive nodes or multiple high-risk features.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Randomised controlled trials have shown that early salvage EBRT results in similar biochemical control and event-free survival rates, and lower genitourinary toxicity, compared with immediate adjuvant EBRT.[239]Parker CC, Clarke NW, Cook AD, et al. Timing of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy (RADICALS-RT): a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1413-21. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31553-1/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002429?tool=bestpractice.com [240]Sargos P, Chabaud S, Latorzeff I, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy versus early salvage radiotherapy plus short-term androgen deprivation therapy in men with localised prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 17): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1341-52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002438?tool=bestpractice.com [241]Kneebone A, Fraser-Browne C, Duchesne GM, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy versus early salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy (TROG 08.03/ANZUP RAVES): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1331-40. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002437?tool=bestpractice.com [242]Vale CL, Fisher D, Kneebone A, et al. Adjuvant or early salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of localised and locally advanced prostate cancer: a prospectively planned systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data. Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1422-31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7611137 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002431?tool=bestpractice.com Systematic reviews of preliminary data support a role for early salvage therapy post-prostatectomy; one review recommends reserving this approach for carefully selected patients with favourable characteristics.[242]Vale CL, Fisher D, Kneebone A, et al. Adjuvant or early salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of localised and locally advanced prostate cancer: a prospectively planned systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data. Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1422-31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7611137 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002431?tool=bestpractice.com [243]Sachdev S, Carroll P, Sandler H, et al. Assessment of postprostatectomy radiotherapy as adjuvant or salvage therapy in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review. JAMA Oncol. 2020 Nov 1;6(11):1793-800. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32852528?tool=bestpractice.com
PSA failure after radical prostatectomy has no single accepted definition. The American Urological Association defines biochemical recurrence in the post-prostatectomy setting as a rise in PSA ≥0.2 micrograms/L (≥0.2 nanograms/mL) and a confirmatory value of >0.2 micrograms/L (>0.2 nanograms/mL).[233]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part I: introduction and treatment decision-mMaking at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):509-17. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003892 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421253?tool=bestpractice.com [244]Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL, et al. Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):540-5. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.097 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17222629?tool=bestpractice.com The National Comprehensive Cancer Network defines post-prostatectomy PSA recurrence as undetectable post-prostatectomy PSA with a subsequent detectable PSA that increases on two or more measurements or increases to PSA >0.1 micrograms/L (>0.1 nanograms/mL).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx Patients receiving early salvage EBRT at lower PSA levels (≥0.1 to 0.2 micrograms/L [≥0.1 to 0.2 nanograms/mL]) have demonstrated better outcomes compared with those receiving salvage EBRT at higher PSA levels.[233]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part I: introduction and treatment decision-mMaking at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):509-17. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003892 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421253?tool=bestpractice.com [245]Abugharib A, Jackson WC, Tumati V, et al. Very early salvage radiotherapy improves distant metastasis-free survival. J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 pt 1):662-8. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.106 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27614333?tool=bestpractice.com
Observation is recommended instead of salvage therapy in patients with life expectancy ≤5 years.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [238]Touijer KA, Mazzola CR, Sjoberg DD, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with lymph node metastasis treated with radical prostatectomy without adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy. Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):20-5. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.053 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23619390?tool=bestpractice.com
adjuvant external beam radiotherapy
For patients with life expectancy >5 years with adverse pathological or laboratory features (e.g., positive margins, extracapsular extension [pT3 disease], seminal vesicle invasion, or a detectable prostate-specific antigen [PSA]) and no lymph node metastases after radical prostatectomy, options include adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Risk assessment (including use of nomograms) should be carried out to inform adjuvant therapy decisions in these patients.[234]Nguyen PL, Haddad Z, Ross AE, et al. Ability of a genomic classifier to predict metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality after radiation or surgery based on needle biopsy specimens. Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):845-52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283817303901 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28528811?tool=bestpractice.com [235]Spratt DE, Yousefi K, Deheshi S, et al. Individual patient-level meta-analysis of the performance of the decipher genomic classifier in high-risk men after prostatectomy to predict development of metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 20;35(18):1991-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530581 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28358655?tool=bestpractice.com [236]Marascio J, Spratt DE, Zhang J, et al. Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Jun;23(2):295-302. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237345 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719663?tool=bestpractice.com The Decipher molecular assay may also be considered to guide decision-making discussions, along with clinical and pathological information, PSA level, and PSA doubling time.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [234]Nguyen PL, Haddad Z, Ross AE, et al. Ability of a genomic classifier to predict metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality after radiation or surgery based on needle biopsy specimens. Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):845-52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283817303901 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28528811?tool=bestpractice.com [235]Spratt DE, Yousefi K, Deheshi S, et al. Individual patient-level meta-analysis of the performance of the decipher genomic classifier in high-risk men after prostatectomy to predict development of metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 20;35(18):1991-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530581 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28358655?tool=bestpractice.com [236]Marascio J, Spratt DE, Zhang J, et al. Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Jun;23(2):295-302. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237345 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719663?tool=bestpractice.com [237]Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Kattan MW, et al. Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):2035-41. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2670394 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17513807?tool=bestpractice.com Shared decisions about treatment should be based on assessment of potential benefits and harms.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [238]Touijer KA, Mazzola CR, Sjoberg DD, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with lymph node metastasis treated with radical prostatectomy without adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy. Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):20-5. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.053 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23619390?tool=bestpractice.com
Adjuvant EBRT has been shown to improve progression-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival in patients with adverse pathological features discovered during radical prostatectomy, compared with no adjuvant therapy.[246]Bolla M, van Poppel H, Colette L, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet. 2005 Aug 13-19;366(9485):572-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16099293?tool=bestpractice.com [247]Bolla M, van Poppel H, Tombal B, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer: long-term results of a randomised controlled trial (EORTC trial 22911). Lancet. 2012 Dec 8;380(9858):2018-27. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23084481?tool=bestpractice.com [248]Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Paradelo J, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological T3N0M0 prostate cancer significantly reduces risk of metastases and improves survival: long-term followup of a randomized clinical trial. J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):956-62. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3510761 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19167731?tool=bestpractice.com [249]Hackman G, Taari K, Tammela TL, et al. Randomised trial of adjuvant radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy versus radical prostatectomy alone in prostate cancer patients with positive margins or extracapsular extension. Eur Urol. 2019 Nov;76(5):586-95. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31375279?tool=bestpractice.com
Observation is recommended instead of adjuvant therapy in patients with life expectancy ≤5 years.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [238]Touijer KA, Mazzola CR, Sjoberg DD, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with lymph node metastasis treated with radical prostatectomy without adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy. Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):20-5. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.053 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23619390?tool=bestpractice.com
adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
The addition of adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist) to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) may be of benefit in selected patients with negative lymph nodes, such as those with a high Decipher score (e.g., >0.6).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [250]Feng FY, Huang HC, Spratt DE, et al. Validation of a 22-gene genomic classifier in patients with recurrent prostate cancer: an ancillary study of the NRG/RTOG 9601 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;7(4):544-52. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2776225 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33570548?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
leuprorelin
OR
goserelin
OR
degarelix
OR
relugolix
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and the bisphosphonates zoledronic acid and alendronic acid are recommended to reduce the risk of bone fractures in patients with non-metastatic disease if they are receiving ADT and have osteoporosis (e.g., T score -2.5 on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] scan) or an increased risk of fractures (e.g., ≥20% for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fractures, or ≥3% for 10-year risk of hip fractures, based on FRAX® [Fracture Risk Assessment Tool]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [360]Alibhai SMH, Zukotynski K, Walker-Dilks C, et al. Bone health and bone-targeted therapies for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 5;167(5):341-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785760?tool=bestpractice.com [361]Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, et al. Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2916-46. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01696 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532726?tool=bestpractice.com University of Sheffield: FRAX tool Opens in new window
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent blood calcium monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
monitoring with early salvage external beam radiotherapy
For patients with life expectancy >5 years with lymph node metastases after radical prostatectomy, options include monitoring with consideration of early salvage external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for a detectable, rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level or a PSA >0.1 micrograms/L (>0.1 nanograms/mL) (before PSA reaches 0.5 micrograms/L [0.5 nanograms/mL]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Risk assessment (including use of nomograms) should be carried out to inform decision-making in these patients.The Decipher molecular assay may also be considered to guide decision-making discussions, along with clinical and pathological information, PSA level, and PSA doubling time.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [234]Nguyen PL, Haddad Z, Ross AE, et al. Ability of a genomic classifier to predict metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality after radiation or surgery based on needle biopsy specimens. Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):845-52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283817303901 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28528811?tool=bestpractice.com [235]Spratt DE, Yousefi K, Deheshi S, et al. Individual patient-level meta-analysis of the performance of the decipher genomic classifier in high-risk men after prostatectomy to predict development of metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 20;35(18):1991-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530581 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28358655?tool=bestpractice.com [236]Marascio J, Spratt DE, Zhang J, et al. Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Jun;23(2):295-302. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237345 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719663?tool=bestpractice.com Shared decisions about treatment should be based on assessment of potential benefits and harms.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [146]Eastham JA, Auffenberg GB, Barocas DA, et al. Clinically localized prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO guideline, part II - principles of active surveillance, principles of surgery, and follow-up. J Urol. 2022 Jul;208(1):19-25. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002758 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35536148?tool=bestpractice.com
Monitoring, with early salvage EBRT performed only when PSA failure is detected, reduces overtreatment with radiotherapy (and associated adverse events) compared with immediate adjuvant EBRT.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Randomised controlled trials have shown that early salvage EBRT results in similar biochemical control and event-free survival rates, and lower genitourinary toxicity, compared with immediate adjuvant EBRT.[239]Parker CC, Clarke NW, Cook AD, et al. Timing of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy (RADICALS-RT): a randomised, controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1413-21. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31553-1/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002429?tool=bestpractice.com [240]Sargos P, Chabaud S, Latorzeff I, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy versus early salvage radiotherapy plus short-term androgen deprivation therapy in men with localised prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 17): a randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1341-52. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002438?tool=bestpractice.com [241]Kneebone A, Fraser-Browne C, Duchesne GM, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy versus early salvage radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy (TROG 08.03/ANZUP RAVES): a randomised, controlled, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1331-40. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002437?tool=bestpractice.com [242]Vale CL, Fisher D, Kneebone A, et al. Adjuvant or early salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of localised and locally advanced prostate cancer: a prospectively planned systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data. Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1422-31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7611137 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002431?tool=bestpractice.com Systematic reviews of preliminary data support a role for early salvage therapy post-prostatectomy; one review recommends reserving this approach for carefully selected patients with favourable characteristics.[242]Vale CL, Fisher D, Kneebone A, et al. Adjuvant or early salvage radiotherapy for the treatment of localised and locally advanced prostate cancer: a prospectively planned systematic review and meta-analysis of aggregate data. Lancet. 2020 Oct 31;396(10260):1422-31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7611137 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33002431?tool=bestpractice.com [243]Sachdev S, Carroll P, Sandler H, et al. Assessment of postprostatectomy radiotherapy as adjuvant or salvage therapy in patients with prostate cancer: a systematic review. JAMA Oncol. 2020 Nov 1;6(11):1793-800. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32852528?tool=bestpractice.com
PSA failure after radical prostatectomy has no single accepted definition. The American Urological Association defines biochemical recurrence in the post-prostatectomy setting as a rise in PSA ≥0.2 micrograms/L (≥0.2 nanograms/mL) and a confirmatory value of >0.2 micrograms/L (>0.2 nanograms/mL).[233]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part I: introduction and treatment decision-mMaking at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):509-17. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003892 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421253?tool=bestpractice.com [244]Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL, et al. Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):540-5. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.097 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17222629?tool=bestpractice.com The National Comprehensive Cancer Network defines PSA recurrence as undetectable post-prostatectomy PSA with a subsequent detectable PSA that increases on two or more measurements or increases to PSA >0.1 micrograms/L (>0.1 nanograms/mL).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx Patients receiving early salvage EBRT at lower PSA levels (≥0.1 to 0.2 micrograms/L [≥0.1 to 0.2 nanograms/mL]) have demonstrated better outcomes compared with those receiving salvage EBRT at higher PSA levels.[233]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part I: introduction and treatment decision-mMaking at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):509-17. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003892 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421253?tool=bestpractice.com [245]Abugharib A, Jackson WC, Tumati V, et al. Very early salvage radiotherapy improves distant metastasis-free survival. J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 pt 1):662-8. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.106 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27614333?tool=bestpractice.com
Observation is recommended instead of salvage therapy in patients with life expectancy ≤5 years.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [238]Touijer KA, Mazzola CR, Sjoberg DD, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with lymph node metastasis treated with radical prostatectomy without adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy. Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):20-5. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.053 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23619390?tool=bestpractice.com
adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy ± external beam radiotherapy
For patients with life expectancy >5 years with lymph node metastases after radical prostatectomy, options include adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist) with or without external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Adjuvant ADT (with or without EBRT) initiated immediately in patients with positive nodes (discovered during prostatectomy) has been shown to improve survival compared with deferring adjuvant ADT until disease progression.[251]Messing EM, Manola J, Yao J, et al. Immediate versus deferred androgen deprivation treatment in patients with node-positive prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. Lancet Oncol. 2006 Jun;7(6):472-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16750497?tool=bestpractice.com [252]Da Pozzo LF, Cozzarini C, Briganti A, et al. Long-term follow-up of patients with prostate cancer and nodal metastases treated by pelvic lymphadenectomy and radical prostatectomy: the positive impact of adjuvant radiotherapy. Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1003-11. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2009.01.046 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19211184?tool=bestpractice.com [253]Abdollah F, Karnes RJ, Suardi N, et al. Impact of adjuvant radiotherapy on survival of patients with node-positive prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec 10;32(35):3939-47. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.54.7893 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25245445?tool=bestpractice.com Retrospective studies and analysis of data from a US cancer database suggest that adjuvant ADT with EBRT may improve survival compared with ADT alone.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [254]Briganti A, Karnes RJ, Da Pozzo LF, et al. Combination of adjuvant hormonal and radiation therapy significantly prolongs survival of patients with pT2-4 pN+ prostate cancer: results of a matched analysis. Eur Urol. 2011 May;59(5):832-40. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.02.024 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21354694?tool=bestpractice.com [255]Lin CC, Gray PJ, Jemal A, et al. Androgen deprivation with or without radiation therapy for clinically node-positive prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Jul;107(7):djv119. https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/107/7/djv119/915451?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25957435?tool=bestpractice.com
Observation is recommended instead of adjuvant therapy in patients with life expectancy ≤5 years.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [238]Touijer KA, Mazzola CR, Sjoberg DD, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with lymph node metastasis treated with radical prostatectomy without adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy. Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):20-5. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.053 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23619390?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
leuprorelin
OR
goserelin
OR
degarelix
OR
relugolix
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and the bisphosphonates zoledronic acid and alendronic acid are recommended to reduce the risk of bone fractures in patients with non-metastatic disease if they are receiving ADT and have osteoporosis (e.g., T score -2.5 on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] scan) or an increased risk of fractures (e.g., ≥20% for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fractures, or ≥3% for 10-year risk of hip fractures, based on FRAX® [Fracture Risk Assessment Tool]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [360]Alibhai SMH, Zukotynski K, Walker-Dilks C, et al. Bone health and bone-targeted therapies for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 5;167(5):341-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785760?tool=bestpractice.com [361]Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, et al. Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2916-46. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01696 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532726?tool=bestpractice.com University of Sheffield: FRAX tool Opens in new window
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
salvage external beam radiotherapy (± androgen deprivation therapy) or monitoring
Salvage therapy is indicated for patients with life expectancy >5 years if there is prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence (PSA does not fall to undetectable levels) or recurrence (increase of previously undetectable PSA on two or more measurements or to PSA >0.1 micrograms/L [>0.1 nanograms/mL]) after radical prostatectomy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [233]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part I: introduction and treatment decision-mMaking at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):509-17. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003892 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421253?tool=bestpractice.com
Evaluation for distant metastases should be carried out (e.g., if the patient develops symptoms or PSA is increasing rapidly), which may include bone and soft tissue imaging. Prostate bed biopsy may be helpful, especially if imaging suggests local recurrence.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Risk assessment (including use of nomograms) should be carried out to inform decision-making about salvage therapy. The Decipher molecular assay may also be considered to aid decision-making discussions, along with clinical and pathological information, PSA level, and PSA doubling time.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [234]Nguyen PL, Haddad Z, Ross AE, et al. Ability of a genomic classifier to predict metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality after radiation or surgery based on needle biopsy specimens. Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):845-52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283817303901 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28528811?tool=bestpractice.com [235]Spratt DE, Yousefi K, Deheshi S, et al. Individual patient-level meta-analysis of the performance of the decipher genomic classifier in high-risk men after prostatectomy to predict development of metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 20;35(18):1991-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530581 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28358655?tool=bestpractice.com [236]Marascio J, Spratt DE, Zhang J, et al. Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Jun;23(2):295-302. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237345 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719663?tool=bestpractice.com [237]Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Kattan MW, et al. Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):2035-41. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2670394 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17513807?tool=bestpractice.com
Salvage external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist) is the main treatment option for postoperative salvage therapy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [256]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part II: treatment delivery for non-metastatic biochemical recurrence after primary radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):518-25. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003891 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421243?tool=bestpractice.com [257]Carrie C, Hasbini A, de Laroche G, et al. Salvage radiotherapy with or without short-term hormone therapy for rising prostate-specific antigen concentration after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 16): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):747-56. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27160475?tool=bestpractice.com [258]Carrie C, Magné N, Burban-Provost P, et al. Short-term androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiotherapy as salvage treatment after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (GETUG-AFU 16): a 112-month follow-up of a phase 3, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1740-1749. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30486-3 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31629656?tool=bestpractice.com Salvage therapy is followed by monitoring for progression (physical examination and PSA every 3-6 months, and imaging for symptoms or increasing PSA).
Combining ADT with salvage EBRT reduces the likelihood of progression and may improve survival outcomes compared with salvage EBRT alone, but decisions (including duration of ADT) should be individualised, based on an assessment of potential benefits and harms, and shared decision-making.[256]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part II: treatment delivery for non-metastatic biochemical recurrence after primary radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):518-25. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003891 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421243?tool=bestpractice.com [257]Carrie C, Hasbini A, de Laroche G, et al. Salvage radiotherapy with or without short-term hormone therapy for rising prostate-specific antigen concentration after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 16): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):747-56. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27160475?tool=bestpractice.com [258]Carrie C, Magné N, Burban-Provost P, et al. Short-term androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiotherapy as salvage treatment after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (GETUG-AFU 16): a 112-month follow-up of a phase 3, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1740-1749. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30486-3 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31629656?tool=bestpractice.com [259]Pollack A, Karrison TG, Balogh AG, et al. The addition of androgen deprivation therapy and pelvic lymph node treatment to prostate bed salvage radiotherapy (NRG Oncology/RTOG 0534 SPPORT): an international, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022 May 14;399(10338):1886-901. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35569466?tool=bestpractice.com
Monitoring for progression (physical examination and PSA every 3-6 months, and imaging for symptoms or increasing PSA) with consideration of salvage therapy (EBRT with or without ADT) may be an alternative to salvage therapy in some patients with PSA persistence or recurrence after radical prostatectomy, following a careful review of the balance of risks and benefits.[237]Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Kattan MW, et al. Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):2035-41. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2670394 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17513807?tool=bestpractice.com Salvage radiotherapy is more effective when given at lower levels of PSA, and should be considered for local or regional control before PSA levels reach 0.5 micrograms/L (0.5 nanograms/mL).[233]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part I: introduction and treatment decision-mMaking at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):509-17. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003892 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421253?tool=bestpractice.com
PSA failure after radical prostatectomy has no single accepted definition, and values between 0.1 and 0.4 micrograms/L (0.1 and 0.4 nanograms/mL) have been used. Guidelines from the American Urological Association, American Society for Radiation Oncology, and Society of Urologic Oncology define biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy as PSA ≥0.2 micrograms/L (≥0.2 nanograms/mL).[233]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part I: introduction and treatment decision-mMaking at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):509-17. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003892 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421253?tool=bestpractice.com Those receiving salvage EBRT at lower PSA levels (i.e., early salvage) have demonstrated better outcomes compared with those receiving salvage EBRT at higher PSA levels.[233]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part I: introduction and treatment decision-mMaking at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):509-17. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003892 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421253?tool=bestpractice.com [245]Abugharib A, Jackson WC, Tumati V, et al. Very early salvage radiotherapy improves distant metastasis-free survival. J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 pt 1):662-8. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.106 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27614333?tool=bestpractice.com
Observation is recommended instead of salvage therapy in patients with life expectancy ≤5 years.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [238]Touijer KA, Mazzola CR, Sjoberg DD, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with lymph node metastasis treated with radical prostatectomy without adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy. Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):20-5. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.053 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23619390?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
leuprorelin
OR
goserelin
OR
degarelix
OR
relugolix
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and the bisphosphonates zoledronic acid and alendronic acid are recommended to reduce the risk of bone fractures in patients with non-metastatic disease if they are receiving ADT and have osteoporosis (e.g., T score -2.5 on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] scan) or an increased risk of fractures (e.g., ≥20% for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fractures, or ≥3% for 10-year risk of hip fractures, based on FRAX® [Fracture Risk Assessment Tool]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [360]Alibhai SMH, Zukotynski K, Walker-Dilks C, et al. Bone health and bone-targeted therapies for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 5;167(5):341-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785760?tool=bestpractice.com [361]Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, et al. Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2916-46. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01696 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532726?tool=bestpractice.com University of Sheffield: FRAX tool Opens in new window
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
salvage external beam radiotherapy + androgen deprivation therapy ± abiraterone
Salvage therapy is indicated for patients with life expectancy >5 years if there is prostate-specific antigen (PSA) persistence (PSA does not fall to undetectable levels) or recurrence (increase of previously undetectable PSA on two or more measurements or to PSA >0.1 micrograms/L [>0.1 nanograms/mL]) after radical prostatectomy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [233]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part I: introduction and treatment decision-mMaking at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):509-17. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003892 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421253?tool=bestpractice.com
Evaluation for distant metastases should be carried out (e.g., if the patient develops symptoms or PSA is increasing rapidly), which may include bone and soft tissue imaging. Prostate bed biopsy may be helpful, especially if imaging suggests local recurrence.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Risk assessment (including use of nomograms) should be carried out to inform decision making about salvage therapy. The Decipher molecular assay may also be considered to aid decision-making discussions, along with clinical and pathological information, PSA level, and PSA doubling time.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [234]Nguyen PL, Haddad Z, Ross AE, et al. Ability of a genomic classifier to predict metastasis and prostate cancer-specific mortality after radiation or surgery based on needle biopsy specimens. Eur Urol. 2017 Nov;72(5):845-52. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283817303901 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28528811?tool=bestpractice.com [235]Spratt DE, Yousefi K, Deheshi S, et al. Individual patient-level meta-analysis of the performance of the decipher genomic classifier in high-risk men after prostatectomy to predict development of metastatic disease. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 20;35(18):1991-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6530581 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28358655?tool=bestpractice.com [236]Marascio J, Spratt DE, Zhang J, et al. Prospective study to define the clinical utility and benefit of Decipher testing in men following prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2020 Jun;23(2):295-302. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7237345 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31719663?tool=bestpractice.com [237]Stephenson AJ, Scardino PT, Kattan MW, et al. Predicting the outcome of salvage radiation therapy for recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 20;25(15):2035-41. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2670394 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17513807?tool=bestpractice.com
Salvage external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonist or antagonist) with or without abiraterone (plus prednisolone or methylprednisolone) is the main treatment option for postoperative salvage therapy in patients with positive pelvic node recurrence.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [256]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part II: treatment delivery for non-metastatic biochemical recurrence after primary radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):518-25. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003891 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421243?tool=bestpractice.com Salvage therapy is followed by monitoring for progression (physical examination and PSA every 3-6 months, and imaging for symptoms or increasing PSA).
Combining ADT with salvage EBRT reduces the likelihood of progression and may improve survival outcomes compared with salvage EBRT alone, but decisions (including duration of ADT) should be based on an assessment of potential benefits and harms, and shared decision-making.[256]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part II: treatment delivery for non-metastatic biochemical recurrence after primary radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):518-25. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003891 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421243?tool=bestpractice.com [257]Carrie C, Hasbini A, de Laroche G, et al. Salvage radiotherapy with or without short-term hormone therapy for rising prostate-specific antigen concentration after radical prostatectomy (GETUG-AFU 16): a randomised, multicentre, open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):747-56. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27160475?tool=bestpractice.com [258]Carrie C, Magné N, Burban-Provost P, et al. Short-term androgen deprivation therapy combined with radiotherapy as salvage treatment after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (GETUG-AFU 16): a 112-month follow-up of a phase 3, randomised trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1740-1749. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30486-3 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31629656?tool=bestpractice.com [259]Pollack A, Karrison TG, Balogh AG, et al. The addition of androgen deprivation therapy and pelvic lymph node treatment to prostate bed salvage radiotherapy (NRG Oncology/RTOG 0534 SPPORT): an international, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2022 May 14;399(10338):1886-901. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35569466?tool=bestpractice.com
Abiraterone (a second-generation anti-androgen) is approved for use in metastatic disease. However, off-label use in combination with EBRT and ADT (e.g., an LHRH agonist or antagonist) for selected patients with positive pelvic node recurrence may be considered.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [230]James ND, de Bono JS, Spears MR, et al. Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):338-51. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533216 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578639?tool=bestpractice.com Abiraterone should not be used concurrently with another anti-androgen (e.g., nilutamide, bicalutamide, flutamide), and it should always be given with prednisolone or methylprednisolone (depending on the formulation of abiraterone).
PSA failure after radical prostatectomy has no single accepted definition. The American Urological Association defines biochemical recurrence in the post-prostatectomy setting as a rise in PSA ≥0.2 micrograms/L (≥0.2 nanograms/mL) and a confirmatory value of >0.2 micrograms/L (>0.2 nanograms/mL).[233]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part I: introduction and treatment decision-mMaking at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):509-17. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003892 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421253?tool=bestpractice.com [244]Cookson MS, Aus G, Burnett AL, et al. Variation in the definition of biochemical recurrence in patients treated for localized prostate cancer: the American Urological Association Prostate Guidelines for Localized Prostate Cancer Update Panel report and recommendations for a standard in the reporting of surgical outcomes. J Urol. 2007 Feb;177(2):540-5. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1016/j.juro.2006.10.097 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17222629?tool=bestpractice.com The National Comprehensive Cancer Network defines PSA persistence/recurrence as PSA level that does not fall to undetectable levels (PSA persistence) or undetectable post-prostatectomy PSA with a subsequent detectable PSA that increases on two or more measurements (PSA recurrence) or increases to PSA >0.1 micrograms/L (>0.1 nanograms/mL).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx Those receiving post-prostatectomy salvage EBRT at lower PSA levels (i.e., early salvage) have demonstrated better outcomes compared with those receiving salvage EBRT at higher PSA levels.[233]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part I: introduction and treatment decision-mMaking at the time of suspected biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):509-17. https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000003892 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421253?tool=bestpractice.com [245]Abugharib A, Jackson WC, Tumati V, et al. Very early salvage radiotherapy improves distant metastasis-free survival. J Urol. 2017 Mar;197(3 pt 1):662-8. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2016.08.106 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27614333?tool=bestpractice.com
Observation is recommended instead of salvage therapy in patients with life expectancy ≤5 years.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [238]Touijer KA, Mazzola CR, Sjoberg DD, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with lymph node metastasis treated with radical prostatectomy without adjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy. Eur Urol. 2014 Jan;65(1):20-5. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.03.053 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23619390?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
leuprorelin
OR
goserelin
OR
degarelix
OR
relugolix
OR
leuprorelin
or
goserelin
or
degarelix
or
relugolix
-- AND --
abiraterone acetate
More abiraterone acetateAdminister non-micronised formulation with prednisolone, and micronised formulation with methylprednisolone.
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and the bisphosphonates zoledronic acid and alendronic acid are recommended to reduce the risk of bone fractures in patients with non-metastatic disease if they are receiving ADT and have osteoporosis (e.g., T score -2.5 on dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry [DXA] scan) or an increased risk of fractures (e.g., ≥20% for 10-year risk of major osteoporotic fractures, or ≥3% for 10-year risk of hip fractures, based on FRAX® [Fracture Risk Assessment Tool]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [360]Alibhai SMH, Zukotynski K, Walker-Dilks C, et al. Bone health and bone-targeted therapies for nonmetastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 5;167(5):341-50. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785760?tool=bestpractice.com [361]Shapiro CL, Van Poznak C, Lacchetti C, et al. Management of osteoporosis in survivors of adult cancers with nonmetastatic disease: ASCO clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 1;37(31):2916-46. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.19.01696 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31532726?tool=bestpractice.com University of Sheffield: FRAX tool Opens in new window
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
non-metastatic disease: post-external beam radiotherapy
monitoring or androgen deprivation therapy or local secondary therapy
Salvage therapy is indicated for patients with life expectancy >5 years if there is prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence or positive digital rectal examination after primary external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). PSA recurrence after EBRT is defined as PSA increase of ≥2 micrograms/L (≥2 nanograms/mL) above the nadir PSA.[260]Roach M 3rd, Hanks G, Thames H Jr, et al. Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 15;65(4):965-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16798415?tool=bestpractice.com Evaluation for salvage therapy can also be considered if the PSA is increasing but has not reached 2 micrograms/L (2 nanograms/mL) above nadir.
Treatment decisions should be individualised, guided by risk stratification; PSA density, and bone and soft tissue imaging should be performed, with consideration of prostate/seminal vesicle biopsy if imaging is negative for metastases.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [261]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part III: salvage therapy after radiotherapy or focal therapy, pelvic nodal recurrence and oligometastasis, and future directions. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):526-32. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003890 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421252?tool=bestpractice.com
If negative for regional lymph nodes and distant metastases, options include: monitoring for progression (with consideration of prostate/seminal vesicle biopsy); androgen deprivation therapy (based on PSA density); local secondary therapy, which may include salvage prostatectomy plus pelvic lymph node dissection, salvage cryotherapy, re-irradiation (low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy, or stereotactic body radiotherapy), high-intensity focused ultrasound.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [261]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part III: salvage therapy after radiotherapy or focal therapy, pelvic nodal recurrence and oligometastasis, and future directions. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):526-32. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003890 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421252?tool=bestpractice.com [262]Beyer DC. Permanent brachytherapy as salvage treatment for recurrent prostate cancer. Urology. 1999 Nov;54(5):880-3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10565751?tool=bestpractice.com [263]Kimura M, Mouraviev V, Tsivian M, et al. Current salvage methods for recurrent prostate cancer after failure of primary radiotherapy. BJU Int. 2010 Jan;105(2):191-201. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08715.x http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19583717?tool=bestpractice.com [264]Mohler JL, Halabi S, Ryan ST, et al. Management of recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy: long-term results from CALGB 9687 (Alliance), a prospective multi-institutional salvage prostatectomy series. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 May;22(2):309-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30385835?tool=bestpractice.com
Salvage brachytherapy provides precise treatment for pathologically confirmed (e.g., using magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy) locally recurrent disease, therefore minimising toxicity to adjacent organs. Use of salvage prostatectomy and salvage cryotherapy is limited by treatment-related adverse effects (e.g., erectile dysfunction).[264]Mohler JL, Halabi S, Ryan ST, et al. Management of recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy: long-term results from CALGB 9687 (Alliance), a prospective multi-institutional salvage prostatectomy series. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 May;22(2):309-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30385835?tool=bestpractice.com [265]Tefilli MV, Gheiler EL, Tiquert R, et al. Salvage surgery or salvage radiotherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer. Urology. 1998 Aug;52(2):224-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9697786?tool=bestpractice.com [266]Pisters LL, Dinney CP, Pettaway CA, et al. A feasibility study of cryotherapy followed by radical prostatectomy for locally advanced prostate cancer. J Urol. 1999 Feb;161(2):509-14. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9915437?tool=bestpractice.com [267]de Castro Abreu AL, Bahn D, Leslie S, et al. Salvage focal and salvage total cryoablation for locally recurrent prostate cancer after primary radiation therapy. BJU Int. 2013 Aug;112(3):298-307. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23826840?tool=bestpractice.com [268]Li YH, Elshafei A, Agarwal G, et al. Salvage focal prostate cryoablation for locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy: initial results from the cryo on-line data registry. Prostate. 2015 Jan;75(1):1-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25283814?tool=bestpractice.com [269]Bahn DK, Lee F, Badalament R, et al. Targeted cryoablation of the prostate: 7-year outcomes in the primary treatment of prostate cancer. Urology. 2002 Aug;60(2 suppl 1):3-11. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12206842?tool=bestpractice.com [270]Cresswell J, Asterling S, Chaudhary M, et al. Third-generation cryotherapy for prostate cancer in the UK: a prospective study of the early outcomes in primary and recurrent disease. BJU Int. 2006 May;97(5):969-74. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06073.x http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16643478?tool=bestpractice.com
Observation is recommended instead of salvage therapy in patients with life expectancy ≤5 years.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
monitoring or androgen deprivation therapy (± abiraterone) or local secondary therapy (± androgen deprivation therapy)
Salvage therapy is indicated for patients with life expectancy >5 years if there is prostate-specific antigen (PSA) recurrence or positive digital rectal examination after primary external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). PSA recurrence after EBRT is defined as PSA increase of ≥2 micrograms/L (≥2 nanograms/mL) above the nadir PSA.[260]Roach M 3rd, Hanks G, Thames H Jr, et al. Defining biochemical failure following radiotherapy with or without hormonal therapy in men with clinically localized prostate cancer: recommendations of the RTOG-ASTRO Phoenix Consensus Conference. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 15;65(4):965-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16798415?tool=bestpractice.com Evaluation for salvage therapy can also be considered if the PSA is increasing but has not reached 2 micrograms/L (2 nanograms/mL) above nadir.
Treatment decisions should be individualised, guided by risk stratification; PSA density, and bone and soft tissue imaging should be performed, with consideration of prostate/seminal vesicle biopsy if imaging is negative for metastases.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [261]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part III: salvage therapy after radiotherapy or focal therapy, pelvic nodal recurrence and oligometastasis, and future directions. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):526-32. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003890 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421252?tool=bestpractice.com
If positive for regional lymph nodes and distant metastases, options include: monitoring for progression (with consideration of prostate/seminal vesicle biopsy); androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with or without abiraterone (plus prednisolone or methylprednisolone); consideration of local secondary therapy with or without ADT (e.g., pelvic lymph node dissection, pelvic lymph node radiation or re-irradiation [low- or high-dose rate brachytherapy, or stereotactic body radiotherapy]).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [261]Morgan TM, Boorjian SA, Buyyounouski MK, et al. Salvage therapy for prostate cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO guideline part III: salvage therapy after radiotherapy or focal therapy, pelvic nodal recurrence and oligometastasis, and future directions. J Urol. 2024 Apr;211(4):526-32. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003890 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38421252?tool=bestpractice.com [262]Beyer DC. Permanent brachytherapy as salvage treatment for recurrent prostate cancer. Urology. 1999 Nov;54(5):880-3. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10565751?tool=bestpractice.com [263]Kimura M, Mouraviev V, Tsivian M, et al. Current salvage methods for recurrent prostate cancer after failure of primary radiotherapy. BJU Int. 2010 Jan;105(2):191-201. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08715.x http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19583717?tool=bestpractice.com [264]Mohler JL, Halabi S, Ryan ST, et al. Management of recurrent prostate cancer after radiotherapy: long-term results from CALGB 9687 (Alliance), a prospective multi-institutional salvage prostatectomy series. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2019 May;22(2):309-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30385835?tool=bestpractice.com
Abiraterone (a second-generation anti-androgen) is approved for use in metastatic disease. However, off-label use in combination with EBRT and ADT for selected patients with positive pelvic node recurrence may be considered.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [230]James ND, de Bono JS, Spears MR, et al. Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):338-51. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533216 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578639?tool=bestpractice.com Abiraterone should not be used concurrently with another anti-androgen (e.g., nilutamide, bicalutamide, flutamide), and it should always be given with prednisolone or methylprednisolone (depending on the formulation of abiraterone).
Observation is recommended instead of salvage therapy in patients with life expectancy ≤5 years.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
non-metastatic disease: castration-resistant
continue androgen deprivation therapy + monitoring or secondary hormone therapy
Patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer are those with clinical, radiographic, or biochemical (PSA) progression despite treatment with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), but who do not have metastases. These patients are at high risk for developing metastases, particularly if PSA doubling time (PSADT) is short (e.g., ≤10 months).
ADT with a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist should continue in these patients to maintain castrate serum levels of testosterone, but further hormonal treatment may be added depending on the PSADT.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
If PSADT is >10 months, monitoring with continued ADT is the preferred option. A secondary hormone therapy can be added to ADT (if not previously used), although evidence of survival benefit is lacking. Secondary hormone therapy may include: ketoconazole plus hydrocortisone; a first-generation anti-androgen (e.g., nilutamide, bicalutamide, flutamide); or a corticosteroid (e.g., hydrocortisone, prednisolone, dexamethasone).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx Ketoconazole may cause severe liver injury and adrenal insufficiency. It is contraindicated in patients with liver disease and expert guidance should be sought if used. Liver and adrenal function should be monitored before and during treatment.[274]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA drug safety communication: FDA limits usage of Nizoral (ketoconazole) oral tablets due to potentially fatal liver injury and risk of drug interactions and adrenal gland problems. July 2013 [internet publication]. http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm362415.htm
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
ketoconazole
and
hydrocortisone
OR
nilutamide
OR
bicalutamide
OR
flutamide
OR
hydrocortisone
OR
prednisolone
OR
dexamethasone
continue androgen deprivation therapy + anti-androgen withdrawal
Anti-androgen withdrawal (i.e., to exclude an anti-androgen withdrawal effect) may be an option for non-metastatic castration-resistant disease.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [271]Dupont A, Gomez JL, Cusan L, et al. Response to flutamide withdrawal in advanced prostate cancer in progression under combination therapy. J Urol. 1993 Sep;150(3):908-13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7688437?tool=bestpractice.com [272]Sartor AO, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, et al. Antiandrogen withdrawal in castrate-refractory prostate cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group trial (SWOG 9426). Cancer. 2008 Jun;112(11):2393-400. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23473 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18383517?tool=bestpractice.com [273]Small EJ, Halabi S, Dawson NA, et al. Antiandrogen withdrawal alone or in combination with ketoconazole in androgen-independent prostate cancer patients: a phase III trial (CALGB 9583). J Clin Oncol. 2004 Mar 15;22(6):1025-33. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15020604?tool=bestpractice.com
continue androgen deprivation therapy + second-generation anti-androgen
Patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer are those with clinical, radiographic, or biochemical (PSA) progression despite treatment with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), but who do not have metastases. These patients are at high risk for developing metastases, particularly if PSA doubling time (PSADT) is short (e.g., ≤10 months).
ADT with a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist should continue in these patients to maintain castrate serum levels of testosterone, but further hormonal treatment may be added depending on the PSADT.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
If PSADT is ≤10 months, a second-generation anti-androgen (e.g., apalutamide, darolutamide, or enzalutamide) can be added to ADT.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Randomised studies of second-generation anti-androgens in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and PSADT ≤10 months have demonstrated improved overall survival, metastasis-free survival, and time to progression compared with placebo, without compromising quality of life.[275]Smith MR, Saad F, Chowdhury S, et al. Apalutamide treatment and metastasis-free survival in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Apr 12;378(15):1408-18. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29420164?tool=bestpractice.com [276]Hussain M, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Enzalutamide in men with nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Jun 28;378(26):2465-74. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29949494?tool=bestpractice.com [277]Fizazi K, Shore N, Tammela TL, et al. Darolutamide in nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Mar 28;380(13):1235-46. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30763142?tool=bestpractice.com [278]Saad F, Cella D, Basch E, et al. Effect of apalutamide on health-related quality of life in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an analysis of the SPARTAN randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):1404-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30213449?tool=bestpractice.com [279]Tombal B, Saad F, Penson D, et al. Patient-reported outcomes following enzalutamide or placebo in men with non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (PROSPER): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Apr;20(4):556-69. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30770294?tool=bestpractice.com [280]Sternberg CN, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Enzalutamide and survival in nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Jun 4;382(23):2197-206. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32469184?tool=bestpractice.com [281]Fizazi K, Shore N, Tammela TL, et al. Nonmetastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer and survival with darolutamide. N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 10;383(11):1040-9. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001342 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32905676?tool=bestpractice.com [282]Smith MR, Saad F, Chowdhury S, et al. Apalutamide and overall survival in prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):150-8. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030228382030628X http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32907777?tool=bestpractice.com [283]Fallah J, Zhang L, Amatya A, et al. Survival outcomes in older men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with androgen receptor inhibitors: a US Food and Drug Administration pooled analysis of patient-level data from three randomised trials. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Sep;22(9):1230-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34310904?tool=bestpractice.com It is not known if similar benefit would be achieved in men with a PSADT >10 months.
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
apalutamide
OR
darolutamide
OR
enzalutamide
continue androgen deprivation therapy + secondary hormone therapy or anti-androgen withdrawal
Alternative options for patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant disease and PSADT ≤10 months include other secondary hormone options or anti-androgen withdrawal (as described for PSADT is >10 months).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [271]Dupont A, Gomez JL, Cusan L, et al. Response to flutamide withdrawal in advanced prostate cancer in progression under combination therapy. J Urol. 1993 Sep;150(3):908-13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7688437?tool=bestpractice.com [272]Sartor AO, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, et al. Antiandrogen withdrawal in castrate-refractory prostate cancer: a Southwest Oncology Group trial (SWOG 9426). Cancer. 2008 Jun;112(11):2393-400. https://www.doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23473 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18383517?tool=bestpractice.com [273]Small EJ, Halabi S, Dawson NA, et al. Antiandrogen withdrawal alone or in combination with ketoconazole in androgen-independent prostate cancer patients: a phase III trial (CALGB 9583). J Clin Oncol. 2004 Mar 15;22(6):1025-33. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15020604?tool=bestpractice.com [378]Aizawa R, Takayama K, Nakamura K, et al. Long-term outcomes of definitive external-beam radiotherapy for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug;23(4):749-56. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29556917?tool=bestpractice.com
metastatic disease: castration-sensitive
androgen deprivation therapy + second-generation anti-androgen ± docetaxel
The main treatment goals for metastatic disease are prolongation of survival while maintaining quality of life, and palliation of symptoms that may arise from metastatic tumour deposits.
Patients with castration-sensitive metastatic disease include those with metastatic disease at presentation, and those who are not receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) when metastatic disease develops (i.e., castration-naive).
Genetic testing (germline and somatic) should be carried out in all patients with metastatic disease (if not done previously) to inform prognosis and guide treatment decisions, including eligibility for clinical trials and suitability for novel targeted therapies.[284]Abida W, Armenia J, Gopalan A, et al. Prospective genomic profiling of prostate cancer across disease states reveals germline and somatic alterations that may affect clinical decision making. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Jul;2017:PO.17.00029. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558263 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28825054?tool=bestpractice.com [285]Lowrance W, Dreicer R, Jarrard DF, et al. Updates to advanced prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline (2023). J Urol. 2023 Jun;209(6):1082-90. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003452 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37096583?tool=bestpractice.com See Diagnosis approach.
Combination therapy with ADT (e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone [LHRH] agonist or antagonist) plus a second-generation anti-androgen with or without docetaxel is recommended.[230]James ND, de Bono JS, Spears MR, et al. Abiraterone for prostate cancer not previously treated with hormone therapy. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):338-51. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533216 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578639?tool=bestpractice.com [285]Lowrance W, Dreicer R, Jarrard DF, et al. Updates to advanced prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline (2023). J Urol. 2023 Jun;209(6):1082-90. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003452 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37096583?tool=bestpractice.com [286]Morgans AK, Chen YH, Sweeney CJ, et al. Quality of life during treatment with chemohormonal therapy: analysis of E3805 chemohormonal androgen ablation randomized trial in prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Apr 10;36(11):1088-95. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29522362?tool=bestpractice.com [287]Fizazi K, Tran N, Fein L, et al. Abiraterone plus prednisone in metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):352-60. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1704174 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578607?tool=bestpractice.com [288]Chi KN, Protheroe A, Rodríguez-Antolín A, et al. Patient-reported outcomes following abiraterone acetate plus prednisone added to androgen deprivation therapy in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic castration-naive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): an international, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Feb;19(2):194-206. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29326030?tool=bestpractice.com [289]Chi KN, Agarwal N, Bjartell A, et al. Apalutamide for metastatic, castration-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 4;381(1):13-24. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1903307 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31150574?tool=bestpractice.com [290]Davis ID, Martin AJ, Stockler MR, et al. Enzalutamide with standard first-line therapy in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Jul 11;381(2):121-31. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1903835 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31157964?tool=bestpractice.com [291]Armstrong AJ, Szmulewitz RZ, Petrylak DP, et al. ARCHES: A randomized, phase III study of androgen deprivation therapy with enzalutamide or placebo in men with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 10;37(32):2974-86. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6839905 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31329516?tool=bestpractice.com [292]Agarwal N, McQuarrie K, Bjartell A, et al. Health-related quality of life after apalutamide treatment in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (TITAN): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Nov;20(11):1518-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31578173?tool=bestpractice.com [293]VanderWeele DJ, Antonarakis ES, Carducci MA, et al. Metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: clinical decision making in a rapidly evolving landscape of life-prolonging therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2019 Nov 10;37(32):2961-67. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.19.01595 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31498754?tool=bestpractice.com [294]Sathianathen NJ, Oestreich MC, Brown SJ, et al. Abiraterone acetate in combination with androgen deprivation therapy compared to androgen deprivation therapy only for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 12;12(12):CD013245. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013245.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33314020?tool=bestpractice.com [295]Chi KN, Chowdhury S, Bjartell A, et al. Apalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer: final survival analysis of the randomized, double-blind, phase III TITAN study. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jul 10;39(20):2294-303. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.20.03488 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33914595?tool=bestpractice.com [296]Fizazi K, Tran N, Fein L, et al. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in patients with newly diagnosed high-risk metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (LATITUDE): final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):686-700. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30987939?tool=bestpractice.com [297]Virgo KS, Rumble RB, Talcott J. Initial management of noncastrate advanced, recurrent, or metastatic prostate cancer: ASCO huideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul 10;41(20):3652-6. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.00155 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37011338?tool=bestpractice.com
Specific treatment options include: ADT plus docetaxel and abiraterone or darolutamide; ADT plus abiraterone, apalutamide, or enzalutamide.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [231]Fizazi K, Gillessen S, ESMO Guidelines Committee. Updated treatment recommendations for prostate cancer from the ESMO clinical practice guideline considering treatment intensification and use of novel systemic agents. Ann Oncol. 2023 Jun;34(6):557-63. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.02.015 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36958590?tool=bestpractice.com [297]Virgo KS, Rumble RB, Talcott J. Initial management of noncastrate advanced, recurrent, or metastatic prostate cancer: ASCO huideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jul 10;41(20):3652-6. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.00155 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37011338?tool=bestpractice.com [300]Hoyle AP, Ali A, James ND, et al. Abiraterone in "high-" and "low-risk" metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2019 Dec;76(6):719-28. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31447077?tool=bestpractice.com
Abiraterone should always be given with prednisolone or methylprednisolone (depending on the formulation of abiraterone).
For patients with high-volume disease (i.e., visceral metastases and/or ≥4 bone metastases with ≥1 beyond the vertebral bodies and pelvis) with synchronous metastases, ADT plus a second-generation anti-androgen with or without docetaxel is preferred. For low-volume disease (i.e., non-regional lymph-node-only disease, or presence of <4 bone metastases without visceral/other metastasis) with metachronous metastases, ADT plus a second-generation anti-androgen is preferred.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [301]Riaz IB, Naqvi SAA, He H, et al. First-line systemic treatment options for metastatic castration-sensitive prostate sancer: a living systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2023 May 1;9(5):635-45. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2802132 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36862387?tool=bestpractice.com
ADT plus docetaxel and abiraterone or darolutamide may improve survival compared with ADT plus docetaxel alone, particularly in those with high-volume castration-sensitive disease.[302]Fizazi K, Foulon S, Carles J, et al. Abiraterone plus prednisone added to androgen deprivation therapy and docetaxel in de novo metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (PEACE-1): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 study with a 2 × 2 factorial design. Lancet. 2022 Apr 30;399(10336):1695-707. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35405085?tool=bestpractice.com [303]Smith MR, Hussain M, Saad F, et al. Darolutamide and survival in metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 24;386(12):1132-42. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2119115 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35179323?tool=bestpractice.com
ADT is usually given continuously, but intermittent ADT may be considered if adverse effects occur with continuous ADT.[71]Parker C, Castro E, Fizazi K, et al. Prostate cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020 Sep;31(9):1119-34. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39898-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32593798?tool=bestpractice.com [306]Conti PD, Atallah AN, Arruda H, et al. Intermittent versus continuous androgen suppression for prostatic cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17;(4):CD005009. http://cochranelibrary-wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD005009.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17943832?tool=bestpractice.com [307]Abrahamsson PA. Potential benefits of intermittent androgen suppression therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Urol. 2010 Jan;57(1):49-59. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19683858?tool=bestpractice.com [308]Botrel TE, Clark O, dos Reis RB, et al. Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation for locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Urol. 2014 Jan 25;14:9. https://www.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2490-14-9 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24460605?tool=bestpractice.com [309]Magnan S, Zarychanski R, Pilote L, et al. Intermittent vs continuous androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2015 Dec;1(9):1261-9. https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2895 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26378418?tool=bestpractice.com [310]Hussain M, Tangen CM, Berry DL, et al. Intermittent versus continuous androgen deprivation in prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 4;368(14):1314-25. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1212299 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23550669?tool=bestpractice.com
A PSA level ≤0.2 micrograms/L (≤0.2 nanograms/mL) after 7 months of ADT is a strong predictor for longer overall survival in patients with castration-sensitive metastatic disease.[311]Harshman LC, Chen YH, Liu G, et al. Seven-month prostate-specific antigen is prognostic in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation with or without docetaxel. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Feb 1;36(4):376-82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5805480 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29261442?tool=bestpractice.com
ADT alone is not recommended for patients with castration-sensitive metastatic disease unless combination treatment is clearly contraindicated or the patient is asymptomatic and has a life expectancy of ≤5 years.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Surgical castration (bilateral orchiectomy) is an option for patients with castration-sensitive metastatic disease, but is rarely used.
LHRH agonists may cause an increase in testosterone levels during the first week of treatment (testosterone flare), which may exacerbate symptoms in patients with metastatic disease.[367]Labrie F, Dupont A, Belanger A, et al. Flutamide eliminates the risk of disease flare in prostatic cancer patients treated with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. J Urol. 1987 Oct;138(4):804-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3309363?tool=bestpractice.com [368]Kuhn JM, Billebaud T, Navratil H, et al. Prevention of the transient adverse effects of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (buserelin) in metastatic prostatic carcinoma by administration of an antiandrogen (nilutamide). N Engl J Med. 1989 Aug 17;321(7):413-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2503723?tool=bestpractice.com [369]Bubley GJ. Is the flare phenomenon clinically significant? Urology. 2001 Aug;58(2 suppl 1):5-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11502435?tool=bestpractice.com An LHRH antagonist (e.g., degarelix, relugolix) should be used for 1 month prior to transitioning to an LHRH agonist if used in the metastatic setting.
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
leuprorelin
or
goserelin
or
degarelix
or
relugolix
-- AND --
abiraterone acetate
More abiraterone acetateAdminister non-micronised formulation with prednisolone, and micronised formulation with methylprednisolone.
or
apalutamide
or
enzalutamide
OR
leuprorelin
or
goserelin
or
degarelix
or
relugolix
-- AND --
docetaxel
-- AND --
abiraterone acetate
More abiraterone acetateAdminister non-micronised formulation with prednisolone, and micronised formulation with methylprednisolone.
or
darolutamide
Secondary options
leuprorelin
OR
goserelin
OR
degarelix
OR
relugolix
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and zoledronic acid (an intravenous bisphosphonate) are recommended to prevent skeletal-related events (e.g., bone fracture, spinal cord compression) in patients with bone metastases.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[362]Jakob T, Tesfamariam YM, Macherey S, et al. Bisphosphonates or RANK-ligand-inhibitors for men with prostate cancer and bone metastases: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 3;12(12):CD013020.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013020.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270906?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
What are the benefits and harms of bisphosphonates in men with advanced prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2000/fullShow me the answer Denosumab is preferred to zoledronic acid due to its superior efficacy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[363]Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, et al. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92.
http://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(12)00617-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975218?tool=bestpractice.com
In June 2018, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a safety alert following a pooled analysis of four phase 3 studies of denosumab in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone.[365]Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Denosumab (Xgeva) for advanced malignancies involving bone: study data show new primary malignancies reported more frequently compared to zoledronate. June 2018 [internet publication]. https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/denosumab-xgeva-for-advanced-malignancies-involving-bone-study-data-show-new-primary-malignancies-reported-more-frequently-compared-to-zoledronate New primary malignancies were reported more frequently among patients receiving denosumab than those receiving zoledronic acid (cumulative incidence of new primary malignancy at 1 year was 1.1% for denosumab and 0.6% for zoledronic acid). No treatment-related patterns for individual cancers or cancer groupings were identified.
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Systemic radiotherapy with the beta-particle emitters strontium-89 or samarium-153 can be considered for palliation in patients with symptomatic bone metastases without visceral metastases. Their use is purely palliative and has largely been superseded by radium-223, which confers a survival advantage.
Radiotherapy in palliative doses can be given to sites of painful bony metastasis. Radiation may include a single treatment or a 1- or 2-week course depending on normal tissue toxicity and patient convenience.[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com Studies do not show a consistent difference between regimens for pain control, but some have reported higher rates of reirradiation in patients receiving single-fraction regimens (although the reason for this is unclear).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [371]Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, et al. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804. https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/97/11/798/2521259?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15928300?tool=bestpractice.com [372]Hoskin PJ, Hopkins K, Misra V, et al. Effect of single-fraction vs multifraction radiotherapy on ambulatory status among patients with spinal canal compression from metastatic cancer: the SCORAD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019 Dec 3;322(21):2084-94. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2756290 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31794625?tool=bestpractice.com [373]Chow E, van der Linden YM, Roos D, et al. Single versus multiple fractions of repeat radiation for painful bone metastases: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):164-71. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70556-4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369114?tool=bestpractice.com Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may be considered instead of conventional palliative radiotherapy for some patients with painful bony metastases (e.g., with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, without neurological symptoms, and not receiving surgery).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [374]Nguyen QN, Chun SG, Chow E, et al. Single-fraction stereotactic vs conventional multifraction radiotherapy for pain relief in patients with predominantly nonspine bone metastases: a randomized phase 2 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):872-8. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2731142 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31021390?tool=bestpractice.com Radiation may also be given to the pelvis, if previously untreated, in palliative doses to relieve obstructive symptoms or bleeding.
androgen deprivation therapy + external beam radiotherapy ± abiraterone or docetaxel
The main treatment goals for metastatic disease are prolongation of survival while maintaining quality of life, and palliation of symptoms that may arise from metastatic tumour deposits.
Patients with castration-sensitive metastatic disease include those with metastatic disease at presentation, and those who are not receiving androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) when metastatic disease develops (i.e., castration-naive).
Genetic testing (germline and somatic) should be carried out in all patients with metastatic disease (if not done previously) to inform prognosis and guide treatment decisions, including eligibility for clinical trials and suitability for novel targeted therapies.[284]Abida W, Armenia J, Gopalan A, et al. Prospective genomic profiling of prostate cancer across disease states reveals germline and somatic alterations that may affect clinical decision making. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Jul;2017:PO.17.00029. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558263 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28825054?tool=bestpractice.com [285]Lowrance W, Dreicer R, Jarrard DF, et al. Updates to advanced prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline (2023). J Urol. 2023 Jun;209(6):1082-90. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003452 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37096583?tool=bestpractice.com See Diagnosis approach.
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) plus external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to the primary tumour (with or without abiraterone or docetaxel) may be an option for some patients with castration-sensitive metastatic disease, depending on disease volume and timing of metastases.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [298]Ali A, Hoyle A, Haran ÁM, et al. Association of bone metastatic burden with survival benefit from prostate radiotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer: a secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;7(4):555-63. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7893550 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33599706?tool=bestpractice.com [299]Sutera PA, Shetty AC, Hakansson A, et al. Transcriptomic and clinical heterogeneity of metastatic disease timing within metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. Ann Oncol. 2023 Jul;34(7):605-14. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(23)00657-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37164128?tool=bestpractice.com Abiraterone should always be given with prednisolone or methylprednisolone (depending on the formulation of abiraterone).
Improved survival has been demonstrated with EBRT plus ADT versus ADT alone in patients with low-volume castration-sensitive disease (i.e., non-regional lymph-node-only disease, or presence of <4 bone metastases without visceral/other metastasis).[158]Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2353-66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269599 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355464?tool=bestpractice.com [304]Burdett S, Boevé LM, Ingleby FC, et al. Prostate radiotherapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a STOPCAP systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol. 2019 Jul;76(1):115-24. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.003 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30826218?tool=bestpractice.com [305]Boevé LMS, Hulshof MCCM, Vis AN, et al. Effect on survival of androgen deprivation therapy alone compared to androgen deprivation therapy combined with concurrent radiation therapy to the prostate in patients with primary bone metastatic prostate cancer in a prospective randomised clinical trial: data from the HORRAD trial. Eur Urol. 2019 Mar;75(3):410-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30266309?tool=bestpractice.com
Hypofractionation and ultra-hypofractionation are the preferred approaches for EBRT.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [158]Parker CC, James ND, Brawley CD, et al. Radiotherapy to the primary tumour for newly diagnosed, metastatic prostate cancer (STAMPEDE): a randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2018 Dec 1;392(10162):2353-66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6269599 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30355464?tool=bestpractice.com
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy and image-guided radiotherapy are the standard EBRT techniques because they allow for a highly conformal delivery of radiation that minimises dose to normal tissues (bladder, rectum, and small bowel), thereby potentially decreasing toxicity to these structures. Stereotactic body radiotherapy is the technique used to deliver ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy.
Patients with significant baseline urinary symptoms may not be suitable for EBRT due to increased risk of urinary obstruction.
Luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) agonists may cause an increase in testosterone levels during the first week of treatment (testosterone flare), which may exacerbate symptoms in patients with metastatic disease.[367]Labrie F, Dupont A, Belanger A, et al. Flutamide eliminates the risk of disease flare in prostatic cancer patients treated with a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist. J Urol. 1987 Oct;138(4):804-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3309363?tool=bestpractice.com [368]Kuhn JM, Billebaud T, Navratil H, et al. Prevention of the transient adverse effects of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogue (buserelin) in metastatic prostatic carcinoma by administration of an antiandrogen (nilutamide). N Engl J Med. 1989 Aug 17;321(7):413-8. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2503723?tool=bestpractice.com [369]Bubley GJ. Is the flare phenomenon clinically significant? Urology. 2001 Aug;58(2 suppl 1):5-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11502435?tool=bestpractice.com An LHRH antagonist (e.g., degarelix, relugolix) should be used for 1 month prior to transitioning to an LHRH agonist if used in the metastatic setting.
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
leuprorelin
or
goserelin
or
degarelix
or
relugolix
OR
leuprorelin
or
goserelin
or
degarelix
or
relugolix
-- AND --
abiraterone acetate
More abiraterone acetateAdminister non-micronised formulation with prednisolone, and micronised formulation with methylprednisolone.
or
docetaxel
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and zoledronic acid (an intravenous bisphosphonate) are recommended to prevent skeletal-related events (e.g., bone fracture, spinal cord compression) in patients with bone metastases.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[362]Jakob T, Tesfamariam YM, Macherey S, et al. Bisphosphonates or RANK-ligand-inhibitors for men with prostate cancer and bone metastases: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 3;12(12):CD013020.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013020.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270906?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
What are the benefits and harms of bisphosphonates in men with advanced prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2000/fullShow me the answer Denosumab is preferred to zoledronic acid due to its superior efficacy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[363]Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, et al. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92.
http://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(12)00617-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975218?tool=bestpractice.com
In June 2018, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a safety alert following a pooled analysis of four phase 3 studies of denosumab in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone.[365]Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Denosumab (Xgeva) for advanced malignancies involving bone: study data show new primary malignancies reported more frequently compared to zoledronate. June 2018 [internet publication]. https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/denosumab-xgeva-for-advanced-malignancies-involving-bone-study-data-show-new-primary-malignancies-reported-more-frequently-compared-to-zoledronate New primary malignancies were reported more frequently among patients receiving denosumab than those receiving zoledronic acid (cumulative incidence of new primary malignancy at 1 year was 1.1% for denosumab and 0.6% for zoledronic acid). No treatment-related patterns for individual cancers or cancer groupings were identified.
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Systemic radiotherapy with the beta-particle emitters strontium-89 or samarium-153 can be considered for palliation in patients with symptomatic bone metastases without visceral metastases. Their use is purely palliative and has largely been superseded by radium-223, which confers a survival advantage.
Radiotherapy in palliative doses can be given to sites of painful bony metastasis. Radiation may include a single treatment or a 1- or 2-week course depending on normal tissue toxicity and patient convenience.[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com Studies do not show a consistent difference between regimens for pain control, but some have reported higher rates of reirradiation in patients receiving single-fraction regimens (although the reason for this is unclear).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [371]Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, et al. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804. https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/97/11/798/2521259?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15928300?tool=bestpractice.com [372]Hoskin PJ, Hopkins K, Misra V, et al. Effect of single-fraction vs multifraction radiotherapy on ambulatory status among patients with spinal canal compression from metastatic cancer: the SCORAD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019 Dec 3;322(21):2084-94. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2756290 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31794625?tool=bestpractice.com [373]Chow E, van der Linden YM, Roos D, et al. Single versus multiple fractions of repeat radiation for painful bone metastases: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):164-71. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70556-4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369114?tool=bestpractice.com Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may be considered instead of conventional palliative radiotherapy for some patients with painful bony metastases (e.g., with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, without neurological symptoms, and not receiving surgery).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [374]Nguyen QN, Chun SG, Chow E, et al. Single-fraction stereotactic vs conventional multifraction radiotherapy for pain relief in patients with predominantly nonspine bone metastases: a randomized phase 2 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):872-8. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2731142 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31021390?tool=bestpractice.com Radiation may also be given to the pelvis, if previously untreated, in palliative doses to relieve obstructive symptoms or bleeding.
metastatic disease: castration-resistant
continue androgen deprivation therapy + docetaxel or second-generation anti-androgen or cabazitaxel
The main treatment goals for metastatic disease are prolongation of survival while maintaining quality of life, and palliation of symptoms that may arise from metastatic tumour deposits.
Patients with castration-resistant metastatic disease are those who develop metastatic disease despite achieving castrate levels of testosterone with primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT; e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist).
Genetic testing (germline and somatic) should be carried out in patients with metastatic disease (if not done previously) to inform prognosis and guide treatment decisions, including eligibility for clinical trials and suitability for novel targeted therapies.[284]Abida W, Armenia J, Gopalan A, et al. Prospective genomic profiling of prostate cancer across disease states reveals germline and somatic alterations that may affect clinical decision making. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Jul;2017:PO.17.00029. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558263 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28825054?tool=bestpractice.com [285]Lowrance W, Dreicer R, Jarrard DF, et al. Updates to advanced prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline (2023). J Urol. 2023 Jun;209(6):1082-90. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003452 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37096583?tool=bestpractice.com See Diagnosis approach.
Treatment options for patients with castration-resistant metastatic disease have expanded rapidly. Optimal sequencing of drugs following docetaxel-based regimens and/or second-generation anti-androgen therapy is unclear, although studies are ongoing and may help guide decisions.[315]Khalaf DJ, Annala M, Taavitsainen S, et al. Optimal sequencing of enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2, crossover trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1730-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727538?tool=bestpractice.com [316]Wallis CJD, Klaassen Z, Jackson WC, et al. Olaparib vs cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110950. https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10950 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34028551?tool=bestpractice.com [317]Hofman MS, Emmett L, Sandhu S, et al. [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021 Feb 27;397(10276):797-804. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33581798?tool=bestpractice.com Treatment decisions should take into account patient goals and preferences, prior treatment exposures, the presence or absence of symptoms, the location of metastases, potential adverse effects, and the presence of certain biomarkers.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
ADT should be continued to maintain castrate levels of testosterone in patients with castration-resistant metastatic disease. Patients should be closely monitored for progression, and treatments added sequentially.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
For patients with no prior treatment with a second-generation anti-androgen therapy (abiraterone, enzalutamide, darolutamide, or apalutamide), ADT can be combined with one of the following options: abiraterone (with prednisolone or methylprednisolone); enzalutamide; a docetaxel-based regimen (e.g., docetaxel plus prednisolone, if no prior use); or cabazitaxel plus prednisolone (if prior docetaxel).[318]Ryan CJ, Smith MR, Fizazi K, et al; COU-AA-302 Investigators. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus placebo plus prednisone in chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (COU-AA-302): final overall survival analysis of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Feb;16(2):152-60. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25601341?tool=bestpractice.com [319]Beer TM, Armstrong AJ, Rathkopf DE, et al; PREVAIL Investigators. Enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer before chemotherapy. N Engl J Med. 2014 Jul 31;371(5):424-33. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4418931 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24881730?tool=bestpractice.com [320]Basch E, Loblaw DA, Oliver TK, et al. Systemic therapy in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Cancer Care Ontario clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Oct 20;32(30):3436-48. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4876355 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25199761?tool=bestpractice.com [321]Penson DF, Armstrong AJ, Concepcion R, et al. Enzalutamide versus bicalutamide in castration-resistant prostate cancer: the STRIVE trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jun 20;34(18):2098-106. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26811535?tool=bestpractice.com [322]Beer TM, Armstrong AJ, Rathkopf D, et al. Enzalutamide in men with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: extended analysis of the phase 3 PREVAIL study. Eur Urol. 2017 Feb;71(2):151-4. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27477525?tool=bestpractice.com [323]Armstrong AJ, Lin P, Tombal B, et al. Five-year survival prediction and safety outcomes with enzalutamide in men with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer from the PREVAIL trial. Eur Urol. 2020 Sep;78(3):347-57. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283820303298 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32527692?tool=bestpractice.com [324]Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, et al. Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1513-20. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa041318 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15470214?tool=bestpractice.com [325]Tannock IF, de Wit R, Berry WR, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004 Oct 7;351(15):1502-12. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15470213?tool=bestpractice.com [326]de Bono JS, Oudard S, Ozguroglu M, et al. Prednisone plus cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment: a randomised open-label trial. Lancet. 2010 Oct 2;376(9747):1147-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20888992?tool=bestpractice.com [327]de Wit R, de Bono J, Sternberg CN, et al. Cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 26;381(26):2506-18. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911206 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31566937?tool=bestpractice.com [328]Fizazi K, Kramer G, Eymard JC, et al. Quality of life in patients with metastatic prostate cancer following treatment with cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide (CARD): an analysis of a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1513-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32926841?tool=bestpractice.com [329]Berthold DR, Pond GR, Soban F, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer: updated survival in the TAX 327 study. J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jan 10;26(2):242-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18182665?tool=bestpractice.com
For patients with progression following treatment with second-generation anti-androgen therapy and no prior docetaxel treatment, ADT plus a docetaxel-based regimen is recommended.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Cabazitaxel is an option for patients who have had prior docetaxel and prior second-generation anti-androgen treatment.[326]de Bono JS, Oudard S, Ozguroglu M, et al. Prednisone plus cabazitaxel or mitoxantrone for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer progressing after docetaxel treatment: a randomised open-label trial. Lancet. 2010 Oct 2;376(9747):1147-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20888992?tool=bestpractice.com [327]de Wit R, de Bono J, Sternberg CN, et al. Cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 26;381(26):2506-18. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911206 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31566937?tool=bestpractice.com [328]Fizazi K, Kramer G, Eymard JC, et al. Quality of life in patients with metastatic prostate cancer following treatment with cabazitaxel versus abiraterone or enzalutamide (CARD): an analysis of a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 4 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Nov;21(11):1513-25. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32926841?tool=bestpractice.com [334]Eisenberger M, Hardy-Bessard AC, Kim CS, et al. Phase III study comparing a reduced dose of cabazitaxel (20 mg/m(2)) and the currently approved dose (25 mg/m(2)) in postdocetaxel patients with metastatic castration-resistant postate cancer-PROSELICA. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Oct 1;35(28):3198-206. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2016.72.1076?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28809610?tool=bestpractice.com Docetaxel rechallenge is a further option for patients treated previously with docetaxel for castration-sensitive disease.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
For patients who are starting to show signs of progression while taking abiraterone plus prednisolone, switching from prednisolone to dexamethasone may be beneficial.[335]Romero-Laorden N, Lozano R, Jayaram A, et al. Phase II pilot study of the prednisone to dexamethasone switch in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with limited progression on abiraterone plus prednisone (SWITCH study). Br J Cancer. 2018 Oct;119(9):1052-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6219494 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30131546?tool=bestpractice.com [336]Fenioux C, Louvet C, Charton E, et al. Switch from abiraterone plus prednisone to abiraterone plus dexamethasone at asymptomatic PSA progression in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2019 Feb;123(2):300-6. https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bju.14511 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30099821?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
docetaxel
and
prednisolone
OR
abiraterone acetate
More abiraterone acetateAdminister non-micronised formulation with prednisolone, and micronised formulation with methylprednisolone.
OR
enzalutamide
Secondary options
cabazitaxel
and
prednisolone
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Continue supportive care for possible adverse effects associated with continued androgen deprivation therapy (e.g., testosterone flare).
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and zoledronic acid (an intravenous bisphosphonate) are recommended to prevent skeletal-related events (e.g., bone fracture, spinal cord compression) in patients with bone metastases.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[362]Jakob T, Tesfamariam YM, Macherey S, et al. Bisphosphonates or RANK-ligand-inhibitors for men with prostate cancer and bone metastases: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 3;12(12):CD013020.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013020.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270906?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
What are the benefits and harms of bisphosphonates in men with advanced prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2000/fullShow me the answer Denosumab is preferred to zoledronic acid due to its superior efficacy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[363]Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, et al. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92.
http://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(12)00617-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975218?tool=bestpractice.com
In June 2018, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a safety alert following a pooled analysis of four phase 3 studies of denosumab in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone.[365]Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Denosumab (Xgeva) for advanced malignancies involving bone: study data show new primary malignancies reported more frequently compared to zoledronate. June 2018 [internet publication]. https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/denosumab-xgeva-for-advanced-malignancies-involving-bone-study-data-show-new-primary-malignancies-reported-more-frequently-compared-to-zoledronate New primary malignancies were reported more frequently among patients receiving denosumab than those receiving zoledronic acid (cumulative incidence of new primary malignancy at 1 year was 1.1% for denosumab and 0.6% for zoledronic acid). No treatment-related patterns for individual cancers or cancer groupings were identified.
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Systemic radiotherapy with the beta-particle emitters strontium-89 or samarium-153 can be considered for palliation in patients with symptomatic bone metastases without visceral metastases. Their use is purely palliative and has largely been superseded by radium-223, which confers a survival advantage.
Radiotherapy in palliative doses can be given to sites of painful bony metastasis. Radiation may include a single treatment or a 1- or 2-week course depending on normal tissue toxicity and patient convenience.[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com Studies do not show a consistent difference between regimens for pain control, but some have reported higher rates of re-irradiation in patients receiving single-fraction regimens (although the reason for this is unclear).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [371]Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, et al. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804. https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/97/11/798/2521259?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15928300?tool=bestpractice.com [372]Hoskin PJ, Hopkins K, Misra V, et al. Effect of single-fraction vs multifraction radiotherapy on ambulatory status among patients with spinal canal compression from metastatic cancer: the SCORAD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019 Dec 3;322(21):2084-94. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2756290 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31794625?tool=bestpractice.com [373]Chow E, van der Linden YM, Roos D, et al. Single versus multiple fractions of repeat radiation for painful bone metastases: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):164-71. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70556-4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369114?tool=bestpractice.com Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may be considered instead of conventional palliative radiotherapy for some patients with painful bony metastases (e.g., with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, without neurological symptoms, and not receiving surgery).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [374]Nguyen QN, Chun SG, Chow E, et al. Single-fraction stereotactic vs conventional multifraction radiotherapy for pain relief in patients with predominantly nonspine bone metastases: a randomized phase 2 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):872-8. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2731142 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31021390?tool=bestpractice.com Radiation may also be given to the pelvis, if previously untreated, in palliative doses to relieve obstructive symptoms or bleeding.
continue androgen deprivation therapy + olaparib or rucaparib
The main treatment goals for metastatic disease are prolongation of survival while maintaining quality of life, and palliation of symptoms that may arise from metastatic tumour deposits.
Patients with castration-resistant metastatic disease are those who develop metastatic disease despite achieving castrate levels of testosterone with primary androgen deprivation therapy (ADT; e.g., a luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist).
Genetic testing (germline and somatic) should be carried out in patients with metastatic disease (if not done previously) to inform prognosis and guide treatment decisions, including eligibility for clinical trials and suitability for novel targeted therapies.[284]Abida W, Armenia J, Gopalan A, et al. Prospective genomic profiling of prostate cancer across disease states reveals germline and somatic alterations that may affect clinical decision making. JCO Precis Oncol. 2017 Jul;2017:PO.17.00029. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5558263 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28825054?tool=bestpractice.com [285]Lowrance W, Dreicer R, Jarrard DF, et al. Updates to advanced prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline (2023). J Urol. 2023 Jun;209(6):1082-90. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003452 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37096583?tool=bestpractice.com See Diagnosis approach.
Treatment options for patients with castration-resistant metastatic disease have expanded rapidly. Optimal sequencing of drugs following docetaxel-based regimens and/or second-generation anti-androgen therapy is unclear, although studies are ongoing and may help guide decisions.[315]Khalaf DJ, Annala M, Taavitsainen S, et al. Optimal sequencing of enzalutamide and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 2, crossover trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Dec;20(12):1730-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31727538?tool=bestpractice.com [316]Wallis CJD, Klaassen Z, Jackson WC, et al. Olaparib vs cabazitaxel in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. JAMA Netw Open. 2021 May 3;4(5):e2110950. https://www.doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.10950 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34028551?tool=bestpractice.com [317]Hofman MS, Emmett L, Sandhu S, et al. [(177)Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 versus cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TheraP): a randomised, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2021 Feb 27;397(10276):797-804. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33581798?tool=bestpractice.com Treatment decisions should take into account patient goals and preferences, prior treatment exposures, the presence or absence of symptoms, the location of metastases, potential adverse effects, and the presence of certain biomarkers.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
ADT should be continued to maintain castrate levels of testosterone in patients with castration-resistant metastatic disease. Patients should be closely monitored for progression, and treatments added sequentially.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
For patients with progression following treatment with second-generation anti-androgen therapy (abiraterone, enzalutamide, darolutamide, or apalutamide) and no prior docetaxel treatment, the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors olaparib or rucaparib may be considered in this setting if the patient has a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.[330]Mateo J, Porta N, Bianchini D, et al. Olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA repair gene aberrations (TOPARP-B): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):162-74. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30684-9 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31806540?tool=bestpractice.com [331]de Bono J, Mateo J, Fizazi K, et al. Olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 28;382(22):2091-202. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911440 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32343890?tool=bestpractice.com [332]Hussain M, Mateo J, Fizazi K, et al. Survival with olaparib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 10;383(24):2345-57. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2022485 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32955174?tool=bestpractice.com [333]Fizazi K, Piulats JM, Reaume MN, et al. Rucaparib or physician's choice in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023 Feb 23;388(8):719-32. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2214676?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36795891?tool=bestpractice.com
Anaemia, fatigue, and nausea are commonly reported with PARP inhibitors. Careful monitoring for anaemia and renal and hepatic function is required.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
Primary options
olaparib
OR
rucaparib
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Continue supportive care for possible adverse effects associated with continued androgen deprivation therapy (e.g., testosterone flare).
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and zoledronic acid (an intravenous bisphosphonate) are recommended to prevent skeletal-related events (e.g., bone fracture, spinal cord compression) in patients with bone metastases.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[362]Jakob T, Tesfamariam YM, Macherey S, et al. Bisphosphonates or RANK-ligand-inhibitors for men with prostate cancer and bone metastases: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 3;12(12):CD013020.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013020.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270906?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
What are the benefits and harms of bisphosphonates in men with advanced prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2000/fullShow me the answer Denosumab is preferred to zoledronic acid due to its superior efficacy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[363]Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, et al. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92.
http://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(12)00617-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975218?tool=bestpractice.com
In June 2018, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a safety alert following a pooled analysis of four phase 3 studies of denosumab in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone.[365]Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Denosumab (Xgeva) for advanced malignancies involving bone: study data show new primary malignancies reported more frequently compared to zoledronate. June 2018 [internet publication]. https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/denosumab-xgeva-for-advanced-malignancies-involving-bone-study-data-show-new-primary-malignancies-reported-more-frequently-compared-to-zoledronate New primary malignancies were reported more frequently among patients receiving denosumab than those receiving zoledronic acid (cumulative incidence of new primary malignancy at 1 year was 1.1% for denosumab and 0.6% for zoledronic acid). No treatment-related patterns for individual cancers or cancer groupings were identified.
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Systemic radiotherapy with the beta-particle emitters strontium-89 or samarium-153 can be considered for palliation in patients with symptomatic bone metastases without visceral metastases. Their use is purely palliative and has largely been superseded by radium-223, which confers a survival advantage.
Radiotherapy in palliative doses can be given to sites of painful bony metastasis. Radiation may include a single treatment or a 1- or 2-week course depending on normal tissue toxicity and patient convenience.[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com Studies do not show a consistent difference between regimens for pain control, but some have reported higher rates of re-irradiation in patients receiving single-fraction regimens (although the reason for this is unclear).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [371]Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, et al. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804. https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/97/11/798/2521259?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15928300?tool=bestpractice.com [372]Hoskin PJ, Hopkins K, Misra V, et al. Effect of single-fraction vs multifraction radiotherapy on ambulatory status among patients with spinal canal compression from metastatic cancer: the SCORAD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019 Dec 3;322(21):2084-94. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2756290 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31794625?tool=bestpractice.com [373]Chow E, van der Linden YM, Roos D, et al. Single versus multiple fractions of repeat radiation for painful bone metastases: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):164-71. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70556-4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369114?tool=bestpractice.com Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may be considered instead of conventional palliative radiotherapy for some patients with painful bony metastases (e.g., with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, without neurological symptoms, and not receiving surgery).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [374]Nguyen QN, Chun SG, Chow E, et al. Single-fraction stereotactic vs conventional multifraction radiotherapy for pain relief in patients with predominantly nonspine bone metastases: a randomized phase 2 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):872-8. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2731142 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31021390?tool=bestpractice.com Radiation may also be given to the pelvis, if previously untreated, in palliative doses to relieve obstructive symptoms or bleeding.
sipuleucel-T
An autologous active cellular immunotherapy, sipuleucel-T may be an option for asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients with good functional status (e.g., an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 1).[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [337]Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Shore ND, et al. Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 29;363(5):411-22. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1001294 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20818862?tool=bestpractice.com [338]Higano CS, Armstrong AJ, Sartor AO, et al. Real-world outcomes of sipuleucel-T treatment in PROCEED, a prospective registry of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer. 2019 Dec 1;125(23):4172-80. https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.32445 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31483485?tool=bestpractice.com
Sipuleucel-T is not recommended for patients with visceral disease and a life expectancy of less than 6 months, or patients with hepatic metastases.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [337]Kantoff PW, Higano CS, Shore ND, et al. Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 29;363(5):411-22. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1001294 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20818862?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
sipuleucel-T
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Continue supportive care for possible adverse effects associated with continued androgen deprivation therapy (e.g., testosterone flare).
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and zoledronic acid (an intravenous bisphosphonate) are recommended to prevent skeletal-related events (e.g., bone fracture, spinal cord compression) in patients with bone metastases.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[362]Jakob T, Tesfamariam YM, Macherey S, et al. Bisphosphonates or RANK-ligand-inhibitors for men with prostate cancer and bone metastases: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 3;12(12):CD013020.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013020.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270906?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
What are the benefits and harms of bisphosphonates in men with advanced prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2000/fullShow me the answer Denosumab is preferred to zoledronic acid due to its superior efficacy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[363]Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, et al. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92.
http://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(12)00617-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975218?tool=bestpractice.com
In June 2018, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a safety alert following a pooled analysis of four phase 3 studies of denosumab in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone.[365]Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Denosumab (Xgeva) for advanced malignancies involving bone: study data show new primary malignancies reported more frequently compared to zoledronate. June 2018 [internet publication]. https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/denosumab-xgeva-for-advanced-malignancies-involving-bone-study-data-show-new-primary-malignancies-reported-more-frequently-compared-to-zoledronate New primary malignancies were reported more frequently among patients receiving denosumab than those receiving zoledronic acid (cumulative incidence of new primary malignancy at 1 year was 1.1% for denosumab and 0.6% for zoledronic acid). No treatment-related patterns for individual cancers or cancer groupings were identified.
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Systemic radiotherapy with the beta-particle emitters strontium-89 or samarium-153 can be considered for palliation in patients with symptomatic bone metastases without visceral metastases. Their use is purely palliative and has largely been superseded by radium-223, which confers a survival advantage.
Radiotherapy in palliative doses can be given to sites of painful bony metastasis. Radiation may include a single treatment or a 1- or 2-week course depending on normal tissue toxicity and patient convenience.[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com Studies do not show a consistent difference between regimens for pain control, but some have reported higher rates of re-irradiation in patients receiving single-fraction regimens (although the reason for this is unclear).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [371]Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, et al. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804. https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/97/11/798/2521259?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15928300?tool=bestpractice.com [372]Hoskin PJ, Hopkins K, Misra V, et al. Effect of single-fraction vs multifraction radiotherapy on ambulatory status among patients with spinal canal compression from metastatic cancer: the SCORAD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019 Dec 3;322(21):2084-94. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2756290 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31794625?tool=bestpractice.com [373]Chow E, van der Linden YM, Roos D, et al. Single versus multiple fractions of repeat radiation for painful bone metastases: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):164-71. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70556-4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369114?tool=bestpractice.com Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may be considered instead of conventional palliative radiotherapy for some patients with painful bony metastases (e.g., with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, without neurological symptoms, and not receiving surgery)[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [374]Nguyen QN, Chun SG, Chow E, et al. Single-fraction stereotactic vs conventional multifraction radiotherapy for pain relief in patients with predominantly nonspine bone metastases: a randomized phase 2 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):872-8. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2731142 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31021390?tool=bestpractice.com Evidence is lacking to guide the use of SBRT combined with immunotherapy.[375]Kroeze SGC, Pavic M, Stellamans K, et al. Metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy in combination with targeted therapy or immunotherapy: systematic review and consensus recommendations by the EORTC-ESTRO OligoCare consortium. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Mar;24(3):e121-32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36858728?tool=bestpractice.com Radiation may also be given to the pelvis, if previously untreated, in palliative doses to relieve obstructive symptoms or bleeding.
olaparib or rucaparib monotherapy
Olaparib can be considered for patients with an homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene mutation who have had prior second-generation anti-androgen therapy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [231]Fizazi K, Gillessen S, ESMO Guidelines Committee. Updated treatment recommendations for prostate cancer from the ESMO clinical practice guideline considering treatment intensification and use of novel systemic agents. Ann Oncol. 2023 Jun;34(6):557-63. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.02.015 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36958590?tool=bestpractice.com [330]Mateo J, Porta N, Bianchini D, et al. Olaparib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with DNA repair gene aberrations (TOPARP-B): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jan;21(1):162-74. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30684-9 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31806540?tool=bestpractice.com [331]de Bono J, Mateo J, Fizazi K, et al. Olaparib for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 May 28;382(22):2091-202. https://www.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1911440 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32343890?tool=bestpractice.com [332]Hussain M, Mateo J, Fizazi K, et al. Survival with olaparib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 10;383(24):2345-57. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2022485 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32955174?tool=bestpractice.com Efficacy may vary depending on the genes involved; in one study, of patients with an alteration in one of 15 prespecified HRR genes, those with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation appeared to derive the greatest survival benefit.[332]Hussain M, Mateo J, Fizazi K, et al. Survival with olaparib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 10;383(24):2345-57. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2022485 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32955174?tool=bestpractice.com
Rucaparib can be considered for patients with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who have had prior second-generation anti-androgen therapy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [333]Fizazi K, Piulats JM, Reaume MN, et al. Rucaparib or physician's choice in metastatic prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023 Feb 23;388(8):719-32. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2214676?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36795891?tool=bestpractice.com [339]Abida W, Patnaik A, Campbell D, et al. Rucaparib in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer harboring a BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene alteration. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Nov 10;38(32):3763-72. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.20.01035 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32795228?tool=bestpractice.com [340]Abida W, Campbell D, Patnaik A, et al. Rucaparib for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer associated with a DNA damage repair gene alteration: final results from the phase 2 TRITON2 study. Eur Urol. 2023 Sep;84(3):321-30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283823028282?via%3Dihub http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37277275?tool=bestpractice.com Rucaparib is not recommended for patients without a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [341]Abida W, Campbell D, Patnaik A, et al. Non-BRCA DNA damage repair gene alterations and response to the PARP inhibitor rucaparib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: analysis from the phase II TRITON2 study. Clin Cancer Res. 2020 Jun 1;26(11):2487-96. https://aacrjournals.org/clincancerres/article/26/11/2487/284722/Non-BRCA-DNA-Damage-Repair-Gene-Alterations-and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32086346?tool=bestpractice.com
Anaemia, fatigue, and nausea are commonly reported with PARP inhibitors. Careful monitoring for anemia and renal and hepatic function is required.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
olaparib
OR
rucaparib
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Continue supportive care for possible adverse effects associated with continued androgen deprivation therapy (e.g., testosterone flare).
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and zoledronic acid (an intravenous bisphosphonate) are recommended to prevent skeletal-related events (e.g., bone fracture, spinal cord compression) in patients with bone metastases.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[362]Jakob T, Tesfamariam YM, Macherey S, et al. Bisphosphonates or RANK-ligand-inhibitors for men with prostate cancer and bone metastases: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 3;12(12):CD013020.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013020.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270906?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
What are the benefits and harms of bisphosphonates in men with advanced prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2000/fullShow me the answer Denosumab is preferred to zoledronic acid due to its superior efficacy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[363]Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, et al. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92.
http://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(12)00617-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975218?tool=bestpractice.com
In June 2018, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a safety alert following a pooled analysis of four phase 3 studies of denosumab in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone.[365]Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Denosumab (Xgeva) for advanced malignancies involving bone: study data show new primary malignancies reported more frequently compared to zoledronate. June 2018 [internet publication]. https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/denosumab-xgeva-for-advanced-malignancies-involving-bone-study-data-show-new-primary-malignancies-reported-more-frequently-compared-to-zoledronate New primary malignancies were reported more frequently among patients receiving denosumab than those receiving zoledronic acid (cumulative incidence of new primary malignancy at 1 year was 1.1% for denosumab and 0.6% for zoledronic acid). No treatment-related patterns for individual cancers or cancer groupings were identified.
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Systemic radiotherapy with the beta-particle emitters strontium-89 or samarium-153 can be considered for palliation in patients with symptomatic bone metastases without visceral metastases. Their use is purely palliative and has largely been superseded by radium-223, which confers a survival advantage.
Radiotherapy in palliative doses can be given to sites of painful bony metastasis. Radiation may include a single treatment or a 1- or 2-week course depending on normal tissue toxicity and patient convenience.[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com Studies do not show a consistent difference between regimens for pain control, but some have reported higher rates of re-irradiation in patients receiving single-fraction regimens (although the reason for this is unclear).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [371]Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, et al. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804. https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/97/11/798/2521259?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15928300?tool=bestpractice.com [372]Hoskin PJ, Hopkins K, Misra V, et al. Effect of single-fraction vs multifraction radiotherapy on ambulatory status among patients with spinal canal compression from metastatic cancer: the SCORAD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019 Dec 3;322(21):2084-94. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2756290 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31794625?tool=bestpractice.com [373]Chow E, van der Linden YM, Roos D, et al. Single versus multiple fractions of repeat radiation for painful bone metastases: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):164-71. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70556-4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369114?tool=bestpractice.com Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may be considered instead of conventional palliative radiotherapy for some patients with painful bony metastases (e.g., with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, without neurological symptoms, and not receiving surgery).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [374]Nguyen QN, Chun SG, Chow E, et al. Single-fraction stereotactic vs conventional multifraction radiotherapy for pain relief in patients with predominantly nonspine bone metastases: a randomized phase 2 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):872-8. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2731142 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31021390?tool=bestpractice.com Evidence is lacking to guide the use of SBRT combined with immunotherapy.[375]Kroeze SGC, Pavic M, Stellamans K, et al. Metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy in combination with targeted therapy or immunotherapy: systematic review and consensus recommendations by the EORTC-ESTRO OligoCare consortium. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Mar;24(3):e121-32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36858728?tool=bestpractice.com Radiation may also be given to the pelvis, if previously untreated, in palliative doses to relieve obstructive symptoms or bleeding.
olaparib or niraparib or talazoparib + second-generation anti-androgen
Olaparib or niraparib may be used in combination with abiraterone (plus prednisolone or methylprednisolone) for patients with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation who have not received prior second-generation anti-androgen therapy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [342]Clarke N, Wiechno P, Alekseev B, et al. Olaparib combined with abiraterone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Jul;19(7):975-86. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29880291?tool=bestpractice.com [343]Chi KN, Rathkopf D, Smith MR, et al. Niraparib andabiraterone acetate for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jun 20;41(18):3339-51. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01649?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36952634?tool=bestpractice.com [344]Chi KN, Sandhu S, Smith MR, et al. Niraparib plus abiraterone acetate with prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and homologous recombination repair gene alterations: second interim analysis of the randomized phase III MAGNITUDE trial. Ann Oncol. 2023 Sep;34(9):772-82. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(23)00757-3/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37399894?tool=bestpractice.com
Talazoparib plus enzalutamide may be an option for patients with an HHR mutation who have had no prior docetaxel therapy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [345]Agarwal N, Azad AA, Carles J, et al. Talazoparib plus enzalutamide in men with first-line metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (TALAPRO-2): a randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023 Jul 22;402(10398):291-303. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37285865?tool=bestpractice.com [346]Fizazi K, Azad AA, Matsubara N, et al. First-line talazoparib with enzalutamide in HRR-deficient metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: the phase 3 TALAPRO-2 trial. Nat Med. 2024 Jan;30(1):257-64. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10803259 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38049622?tool=bestpractice.com
Anaemia, fatigue, and nausea are commonly reported with PARP inhibitors. Careful monitoring for anaemia and renal and hepatic function is required.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
olaparib
or
niraparib
-- AND --
abiraterone acetate
More abiraterone acetateAdminister non-micronised formulation with prednisolone, and micronised formulation with methylprednisolone.
-- AND --
prednisolone
OR
talazoparib
and
enzalutamide
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Continue supportive care for possible adverse effects associated with continued androgen deprivation therapy (e.g., testosterone flare).
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and zoledronic acid (an intravenous bisphosphonate) are recommended to prevent skeletal-related events (e.g., bone fracture, spinal cord compression) in patients with bone metastases.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[362]Jakob T, Tesfamariam YM, Macherey S, et al. Bisphosphonates or RANK-ligand-inhibitors for men with prostate cancer and bone metastases: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 3;12(12):CD013020.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013020.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270906?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
What are the benefits and harms of bisphosphonates in men with advanced prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2000/fullShow me the answer Denosumab is preferred to zoledronic acid due to its superior efficacy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[363]Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, et al. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92.
http://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(12)00617-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975218?tool=bestpractice.com
In June 2018, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a safety alert following a pooled analysis of four phase 3 studies of denosumab in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone.[365]Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Denosumab (Xgeva) for advanced malignancies involving bone: study data show new primary malignancies reported more frequently compared to zoledronate. June 2018 [internet publication]. https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/denosumab-xgeva-for-advanced-malignancies-involving-bone-study-data-show-new-primary-malignancies-reported-more-frequently-compared-to-zoledronate New primary malignancies were reported more frequently among patients receiving denosumab than those receiving zoledronic acid (cumulative incidence of new primary malignancy at 1 year was 1.1% for denosumab and 0.6% for zoledronic acid). No treatment-related patterns for individual cancers or cancer groupings were identified.
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Systemic radiotherapy with the beta-particle emitters strontium-89 or samarium-153 can be considered for palliation in patients with symptomatic bone metastases without visceral metastases. Their use is purely palliative and has largely been superseded by radium-223, which confers a survival advantage.
Radiotherapy in palliative doses can be given to sites of painful bony metastasis. Radiation may include a single treatment or a 1- or 2-week course depending on normal tissue toxicity and patient convenience.[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com Studies do not show a consistent difference between regimens for pain control, but some have reported higher rates of re-irradiation in patients receiving single-fraction regimens (although the reason for this is unclear).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [371]Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, et al. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804. https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/97/11/798/2521259?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15928300?tool=bestpractice.com [372]Hoskin PJ, Hopkins K, Misra V, et al. Effect of single-fraction vs multifraction radiotherapy on ambulatory status among patients with spinal canal compression from metastatic cancer: the SCORAD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019 Dec 3;322(21):2084-94. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2756290 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31794625?tool=bestpractice.com [373]Chow E, van der Linden YM, Roos D, et al. Single versus multiple fractions of repeat radiation for painful bone metastases: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):164-71. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70556-4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369114?tool=bestpractice.com Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may be considered instead of conventional palliative radiotherapy for some patients with painful bony metastases (e.g., with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, without neurological symptoms, and not receiving surgery).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [374]Nguyen QN, Chun SG, Chow E, et al. Single-fraction stereotactic vs conventional multifraction radiotherapy for pain relief in patients with predominantly nonspine bone metastases: a randomized phase 2 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):872-8. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2731142 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31021390?tool=bestpractice.com Evidence is lacking to guide the use of SBRT combined with immunotherapy.[375]Kroeze SGC, Pavic M, Stellamans K, et al. Metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy in combination with targeted therapy or immunotherapy: systematic review and consensus recommendations by the EORTC-ESTRO OligoCare consortium. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Mar;24(3):e121-32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36858728?tool=bestpractice.com Radiation may also be given to the pelvis, if previously untreated, in palliative doses to relieve obstructive symptoms or bleeding.
pembrolizumab
A programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)-blocking monoclonal antibody, pembrolizumab may be considered for patients with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR), microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H), or high tumour mutational burden (TMB-H) castration-resistant metastatic prostate cancer.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [285]Lowrance W, Dreicer R, Jarrard DF, et al. Updates to advanced prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline (2023). J Urol. 2023 Jun;209(6):1082-90. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003452 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37096583?tool=bestpractice.com
Much of the evidence for this treatment is based on different tumour types; however, early phase trials report antitumour activity among specific subsets of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.[347]Antonarakis ES, Piulats JM, Gross-Goupil M, et al. Pembrolizumab for treatment-refractory metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: multicohort, open-label phase II KEYNOTE-199 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Feb 10;38(5):395-405. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7186583 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31774688?tool=bestpractice.com [348]Yu EY, Kolinsky MP, Berry WR, et al. Pembrolizumab plus docetaxel and prednisone in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: long-term results from the phase 1b/2 KEYNOTE-365 cohort B study. Eur Urol. 2022 Jul;82(1):22-30. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302283822016657 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35397952?tool=bestpractice.com [349]US Food and Drug Administration (FDA). FDA grants accelerated approval to pembrolizumab for first tissue/site agnostic indication. May 2017 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/Drugs/InformationOnDrugs/ApprovedDrugs/ucm560040.htm [350]Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, et al. Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1353-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32919526?tool=bestpractice.com
Pembrolizumab may cause severe, life-threatening immune-mediated adverse reactions.[351]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: management of immunotherapy-related toxicities [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_3
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
pembrolizumab
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Continue supportive care for possible adverse effects associated with continued androgen deprivation therapy (e.g., testosterone flare).
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and zoledronic acid (an intravenous bisphosphonate) are recommended to prevent skeletal-related events (e.g., bone fracture, spinal cord compression) in patients with bone metastases.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[362]Jakob T, Tesfamariam YM, Macherey S, et al. Bisphosphonates or RANK-ligand-inhibitors for men with prostate cancer and bone metastases: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 3;12(12):CD013020.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013020.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270906?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
What are the benefits and harms of bisphosphonates in men with advanced prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2000/fullShow me the answer Denosumab is preferred to zoledronic acid due to its superior efficacy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[363]Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, et al. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92.
http://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(12)00617-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975218?tool=bestpractice.com
In June 2018, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a safety alert following a pooled analysis of four phase 3 studies of denosumab in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone.[365]Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Denosumab (Xgeva) for advanced malignancies involving bone: study data show new primary malignancies reported more frequently compared to zoledronate. June 2018 [internet publication]. https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/denosumab-xgeva-for-advanced-malignancies-involving-bone-study-data-show-new-primary-malignancies-reported-more-frequently-compared-to-zoledronate New primary malignancies were reported more frequently among patients receiving denosumab than those receiving zoledronic acid (cumulative incidence of new primary malignancy at 1 year was 1.1% for denosumab and 0.6% for zoledronic acid). No treatment-related patterns for individual cancers or cancer groupings were identified.
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Systemic radiotherapy with the beta-particle emitters strontium-89 or samarium-153 can be considered for palliation in patients with symptomatic bone metastases without visceral metastases. Their use is purely palliative and has largely been superseded by radium-223, which confers a survival advantage.
Radiotherapy in palliative doses can be given to sites of painful bony metastasis. Radiation may include a single treatment or a 1- or 2-week course depending on normal tissue toxicity and patient convenience.[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com Studies do not show a consistent difference between regimens for pain control, but some have reported higher rates of re-irradiation in patients receiving single-fraction regimens (although the reason for this is unclear).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [371]Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, et al. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804. https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/97/11/798/2521259?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15928300?tool=bestpractice.com [372]Hoskin PJ, Hopkins K, Misra V, et al. Effect of single-fraction vs multifraction radiotherapy on ambulatory status among patients with spinal canal compression from metastatic cancer: the SCORAD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019 Dec 3;322(21):2084-94. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2756290 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31794625?tool=bestpractice.com [373]Chow E, van der Linden YM, Roos D, et al. Single versus multiple fractions of repeat radiation for painful bone metastases: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):164-71. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70556-4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369114?tool=bestpractice.com Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may be considered instead of conventional palliative radiotherapy for some patients with painful bony metastases (e.g., with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, without neurological symptoms, and not receiving surgery).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [374]Nguyen QN, Chun SG, Chow E, et al. Single-fraction stereotactic vs conventional multifraction radiotherapy for pain relief in patients with predominantly nonspine bone metastases: a randomized phase 2 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):872-8. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2731142 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31021390?tool=bestpractice.com Evidence is lacking to guide the use of SBRT combined with immunotherapy.[375]Kroeze SGC, Pavic M, Stellamans K, et al. Metastases-directed stereotactic body radiotherapy in combination with targeted therapy or immunotherapy: systematic review and consensus recommendations by the EORTC-ESTRO OligoCare consortium. Lancet Oncol. 2023 Mar;24(3):e121-32. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36858728?tool=bestpractice.com Radiation may also be given to the pelvis, if previously untreated, in palliative doses to relieve obstructive symptoms or bleeding.
lutetium (Lu-177) vipivotide tetraxetan
A radioligand therapeutic agent that delivers beta-radiation to prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-expressing cells and the surrounding microenvironment. Lu-177 vipivotide tetraxetan can be considered for patients with progression after taxane-based chemotherapy and second-generation anti-androgen therapy who have PSMA-positive castration-resistant metastatic disease.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [231]Fizazi K, Gillessen S, ESMO Guidelines Committee. Updated treatment recommendations for prostate cancer from the ESMO clinical practice guideline considering treatment intensification and use of novel systemic agents. Ann Oncol. 2023 Jun;34(6):557-63. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2023.02.015 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36958590?tool=bestpractice.com [285]Lowrance W, Dreicer R, Jarrard DF, et al. Updates to advanced prostate cancer: AUA/SUO guideline (2023). J Urol. 2023 Jun;209(6):1082-90. https://www.doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000003452 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37096583?tool=bestpractice.com [352]Garje R, Rumble RB, Parikh RA. Systemic therapy update on 177-lutetium-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: ASCO rapid recommendation. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov 1;40(31):3664-6. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01865 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36112960?tool=bestpractice.com [353]Sartor O, de Bono J, Chi KN, et al. Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021 Sep 16;385(12):1091-103. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8446332 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34161051?tool=bestpractice.com
PSMA-PET imaging is required for patient selection. Gallium (Ga-68) PSMA-11, piflufolastat F-18, or flotufolastat F-18 may be used as radiotracers to detect PSMA expression and determine eligibility.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [352]Garje R, Rumble RB, Parikh RA. Systemic therapy update on 177-lutetium-PSMA-617 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: ASCO rapid recommendation. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Nov 1;40(31):3664-6. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01865 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36112960?tool=bestpractice.com [354]Garje R, Rumble RB, Parikh RA, et al. Systemic Therapy Update on (177)Lutetium-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: ASCO Guideline Rapid Recommendation Update. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Nov 6:JCO2302128. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.23.02128?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37931186?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Continue supportive care for possible adverse effects associated with continued androgen deprivation therapy (e.g., testosterone flare).
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and zoledronic acid (an intravenous bisphosphonate) are recommended to prevent skeletal-related events (e.g., bone fracture, spinal cord compression) in patients with bone metastases.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[362]Jakob T, Tesfamariam YM, Macherey S, et al. Bisphosphonates or RANK-ligand-inhibitors for men with prostate cancer and bone metastases: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 3;12(12):CD013020.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013020.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270906?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
What are the benefits and harms of bisphosphonates in men with advanced prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2000/fullShow me the answer Denosumab is preferred to zoledronic acid due to its superior efficacy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[363]Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, et al. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92.
http://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(12)00617-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975218?tool=bestpractice.com
In June 2018, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a safety alert following a pooled analysis of four phase 3 studies of denosumab in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone.[365]Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Denosumab (Xgeva) for advanced malignancies involving bone: study data show new primary malignancies reported more frequently compared to zoledronate. June 2018 [internet publication]. https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/denosumab-xgeva-for-advanced-malignancies-involving-bone-study-data-show-new-primary-malignancies-reported-more-frequently-compared-to-zoledronate New primary malignancies were reported more frequently among patients receiving denosumab than those receiving zoledronic acid (cumulative incidence of new primary malignancy at 1 year was 1.1% for denosumab and 0.6% for zoledronic acid). No treatment-related patterns for individual cancers or cancer groupings were identified.
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Systemic radiotherapy with the beta-particle emitters strontium-89 or samarium-153 can be considered for palliation in patients with symptomatic bone metastases without visceral metastases. Their use is purely palliative and has largely been superseded by radium-223, which confers a survival advantage.
Radiotherapy in palliative doses can be given to sites of painful bony metastasis. Radiation may include a single treatment or a 1- or 2-week course depending on normal tissue toxicity and patient convenience.[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com Studies do not show a consistent difference between regimens for pain control, but some have reported higher rates of re-irradiation in patients receiving single-fraction regimens (although the reason for this is unclear).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [371]Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, et al. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804. https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/97/11/798/2521259?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15928300?tool=bestpractice.com [372]Hoskin PJ, Hopkins K, Misra V, et al. Effect of single-fraction vs multifraction radiotherapy on ambulatory status among patients with spinal canal compression from metastatic cancer: the SCORAD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019 Dec 3;322(21):2084-94. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2756290 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31794625?tool=bestpractice.com [373]Chow E, van der Linden YM, Roos D, et al. Single versus multiple fractions of repeat radiation for painful bone metastases: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):164-71. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70556-4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369114?tool=bestpractice.com Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may be considered instead of conventional palliative radiotherapy for some patients with painful bony metastases (e.g., with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, without neurological symptoms, and not receiving surgery).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [374]Nguyen QN, Chun SG, Chow E, et al. Single-fraction stereotactic vs conventional multifraction radiotherapy for pain relief in patients with predominantly nonspine bone metastases: a randomized phase 2 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):872-8. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2731142 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31021390?tool=bestpractice.com Radiation may also be given to the pelvis, if previously untreated, in palliative doses to relieve obstructive symptoms or bleeding.
mitoxantrone
May be considered in combination with prednisolone for palliative treatment of symptomatic patients who have progressed on prior docetaxel and cannot tolerate other therapies. It has not been shown to improve survival.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [355]Tannock IF, Osoba D, Stockler MR, et al. Chemotherapy with mitoxantrone plus prednisone or prednisone alone for symptomatic hormone-resistant prostate cancer: a Canadian randomized trial with palliative end points. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Jun;14(6):1756-64. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8656243?tool=bestpractice.com [356]Kantoff PW, Halabi S, Conaway M, et al. Hydrocortisone with or without mitoxantrone in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer: results of the cancer and leukemia group B 9182 study. J Clin Oncol. 1999 Aug;17(8):2506-13. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.1999.17.8.2506?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10561316?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
mitoxantrone
and
prednisolone
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Continue supportive care for possible adverse effects associated with continued androgen deprivation therapy (e.g., testosterone flare).
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and zoledronic acid (an intravenous bisphosphonate) are recommended to prevent skeletal-related events (e.g., bone fracture, spinal cord compression) in patients with bone metastases.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[362]Jakob T, Tesfamariam YM, Macherey S, et al. Bisphosphonates or RANK-ligand-inhibitors for men with prostate cancer and bone metastases: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 3;12(12):CD013020.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013020.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270906?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
What are the benefits and harms of bisphosphonates in men with advanced prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2000/fullShow me the answer Denosumab is preferred to zoledronic acid due to its superior efficacy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[363]Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, et al. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92.
http://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(12)00617-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975218?tool=bestpractice.com
In June 2018, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a safety alert following a pooled analysis of four phase 3 studies of denosumab in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone.[365]Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Denosumab (Xgeva) for advanced malignancies involving bone: study data show new primary malignancies reported more frequently compared to zoledronate. June 2018 [internet publication]. https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/denosumab-xgeva-for-advanced-malignancies-involving-bone-study-data-show-new-primary-malignancies-reported-more-frequently-compared-to-zoledronate New primary malignancies were reported more frequently among patients receiving denosumab than those receiving zoledronic acid (cumulative incidence of new primary malignancy at 1 year was 1.1% for denosumab and 0.6% for zoledronic acid). No treatment-related patterns for individual cancers or cancer groupings were identified.
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Systemic radiotherapy with the beta-particle emitters strontium-89 or samarium-153 can be considered for palliation in patients with symptomatic bone metastases without visceral metastases. Their use is purely palliative and has largely been superseded by radium-223, which confers a survival advantage.
Radiotherapy in palliative doses can be given to sites of painful bony metastasis. Radiation may include a single treatment or a 1- or 2-week course depending on normal tissue toxicity and patient convenience.[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com Studies do not show a consistent difference between regimens for pain control, but some have reported higher rates of re-irradiation in patients receiving single-fraction regimens (although the reason for this is unclear).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [371]Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, et al. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jun 1;97(11):798-804. https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/97/11/798/2521259?login=false http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15928300?tool=bestpractice.com [372]Hoskin PJ, Hopkins K, Misra V, et al. Effect of single-fraction vs multifraction radiotherapy on ambulatory status among patients with spinal canal compression from metastatic cancer: the SCORAD randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019 Dec 3;322(21):2084-94. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2756290 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31794625?tool=bestpractice.com [373]Chow E, van der Linden YM, Roos D, et al. Single versus multiple fractions of repeat radiation for painful bone metastases: a randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Feb;15(2):164-71. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(13)70556-4 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24369114?tool=bestpractice.com Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) may be considered instead of conventional palliative radiotherapy for some patients with painful bony metastases (e.g., with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2, without neurological symptoms, and not receiving surgery).[370]Alcorn S, Cortés ÁA, Bradfield L, et al. External beam radiation therapy for palliation of symptomatic bone metastases: an ASTRO clinical practice guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2024 May 22:S1879-8500(24)00099-7. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(24)00099-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38788923?tool=bestpractice.com [374]Nguyen QN, Chun SG, Chow E, et al. Single-fraction stereotactic vs conventional multifraction radiotherapy for pain relief in patients with predominantly nonspine bone metastases: a randomized phase 2 trial. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Jun 1;5(6):872-8. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2731142 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31021390?tool=bestpractice.com Radiation may also be given to the pelvis, if previously untreated, in palliative doses to relieve obstructive symptoms or bleeding.
radium-223
A calcium mimetic that localises to the bone and delivers radiation directly to bone metastases, radium-223 can be considered for patients with castration-resistant metastatic disease who have symptomatic bone metastases without visceral metastases.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [357]Hoskin P, Sartor O, O'Sullivan JM, et al. Efficacy and safety of radium-223 dichloride in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and symptomatic bone metastases, with or without previous docetaxel use: a prespecified subgroup analysis from the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 ALSYMPCA trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014 Nov;15(12):1397-406. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25439694?tool=bestpractice.com
Radium-223 is associated with adverse events including anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, bone pain, and gastrointestinal disorders. There have also been reports of increased risk of fracture and deaths when used in combination with abiraterone plus prednisolone.[358]Smith M, Parker C, Saad F, et al. Addition of radium-223 to abiraterone acetate and prednisone or prednisolone in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer and bone metastases (ERA 223): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019 Mar;20(3):408-19. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30738780?tool=bestpractice.com [359]European Medicines Agency. EMA restricts use of prostate cancer medicine Xofigo. July 2018 [internet publication]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-restricts-use-prostate-cancer-medicine-xofigo
The European Medicines Agency has restricted the use of radium-223 to symptomatic patients who have received two prior treatments for metastatic prostate cancer, or who cannot receive other treatments. It should not be used with abiraterone and prednisolone or with other systemic cancer therapies (except hormone therapy).[359]European Medicines Agency. EMA restricts use of prostate cancer medicine Xofigo. July 2018 [internet publication]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-restricts-use-prostate-cancer-medicine-xofigo
A careful assessment of risk of fractures should be carried out before, during, and after treatment with radium-223.
Bisphosphonates or denosumab are recommended before starting or resuming treatment with radium-223 to increase bone strength.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx [359]European Medicines Agency. EMA restricts use of prostate cancer medicine Xofigo. July 2018 [internet publication]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-restricts-use-prostate-cancer-medicine-xofigo For more information, see supportive care.
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
supportive care
Additional treatment recommended for SOME patients in selected patient group
Continue supportive care for possible adverse effects associated with continued androgen deprivation therapy (e.g., testosterone flare).
Denosumab (a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits RANK ligand) and zoledronic acid (an intravenous bisphosphonate) are recommended to prevent skeletal-related events (e.g., bone fracture, spinal cord compression) in patients with bone metastases.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[362]Jakob T, Tesfamariam YM, Macherey S, et al. Bisphosphonates or RANK-ligand-inhibitors for men with prostate cancer and bone metastases: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Dec 3;12(12):CD013020.
https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD013020.pub2/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33270906?tool=bestpractice.com
[ ]
What are the benefits and harms of bisphosphonates in men with advanced prostate cancer?/cca.html?targetUrl=https://cochranelibrary.com/cca/doi/10.1002/cca.2000/fullShow me the answer Denosumab is preferred to zoledronic acid due to its superior efficacy.[3]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer [internet publication].
https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/default.aspx
[363]Lipton A, Fizazi K, Stopeck AT, et al. Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92.
http://www.ejcancer.com/article/S0959-8049(12)00617-X/fulltext
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975218?tool=bestpractice.com
In June 2018, the UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) issued a safety alert following a pooled analysis of four phase 3 studies of denosumab in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone.[365]Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Denosumab (Xgeva) for advanced malignancies involving bone: study data show new primary malignancies reported more frequently compared to zoledronate. June 2018 [internet publication]. https://www.gov.uk/drug-safety-update/denosumab-xgeva-for-advanced-malignancies-involving-bone-study-data-show-new-primary-malignancies-reported-more-frequently-compared-to-zoledronate New primary malignancies were reported more frequently among patients receiving denosumab than those receiving zoledronic acid (cumulative incidence of new primary malignancy at 1 year was 1.1% for denosumab and 0.6% for zoledronic acid). No treatment-related patterns for individual cancers or cancer groupings were identified.
In January 2024, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) warned of an increased risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease who are receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in men at high risk for fracture receiving ADT for non-metastatic prostate cancer).[366]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for increased risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). FDA Drug Safety Communication. Jan 2024 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-adds-boxed-warning-increased-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-advanced-chronic-kidney-disease Two safety studies showed a significant increase in the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients treated with denosumab compared with those treated with bisphosphonates, with the highest risk reported in patients with advanced kidney disease, particularly those on dialysis. Severe hypocalcaemia was more common in those with mineral and bone disorder. Patients with advanced chronic kidney disease taking denosumab are at risk of serious outcomes from severe hypocalcaemia, including hospitalisation and death.
Before prescribing denosumab, healthcare professionals should assess kidney function and calcium levels, and consider other treatment options for patients at risk. During treatment, frequent monitoring and prompt management of hypocalcaemia are essential. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Choose a patient group to see our recommendations
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups. See disclaimer
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer