Approach

Foreign body aspiration is usually diagnosed clinically as most patients have acute onset of choking and intractable cough (choking crisis).[4] 

Children may present with a history of choking while eating or playing, or a history of cough and wheeze that is not improving with medical treatment.[30]

Prediction models for the diagnosis of pediatric foreign body aspiration are at high risk of bias and have been inadequately validated.[31] There are currently no prediction models that can be recommended to guide clinical decision-making.

Very young and very old patients might not be able to provide a history suggestive of foreign body aspiration, and symptoms such as cough, wheeze, and shortness of breath are nonspecific and may be caused by coexisting COPD, congestive heart failure, asthma, or pneumonia. In these cases, a high index of suspicion should be maintained and confirmatory studies should be performed promptly.

Clinical evaluation

People found face down, prone, or in neck- and torso-flexion positions associated with aspiration and positional asphyxia, should be moved into the supine position for reassessment.[32]

Prompt diagnosis is essential, especially in children. Delayed bronchoscopy (≥24 hours after arrival to the emergency department) is associated with a higher rate of complication.[33]

A foreign body in the trachea may result in a brassy cough, with or without loss of voice, and bidirectional stridor (during inspiration and expiration). Complete airway obstruction and asphyxia can result from a large object lodged in the trachea or larynx.[30]

Early signs of respiratory failure include tachypnea, bradypnea, tachycardia progressing to bradycardia, and initial increased work of breathing, which can progress to decreased and inadequate work of breathing. Cyanosis, stridor, and altered level of consciousness are ominous signs and may predict impending respiratory arrest.

Predictive signs of bronchial foreign body aspiration include stridor, asphyxia, radiopaque object seen on chest radiograph, a history of foreign body aspiration associated with unilaterally decreased breath sounds, localized wheezing, obstructive hyperinflation, or atelectasis.

Although typically presenting acutely, chronic cough can be a presenting symptom of foreign body inhalation.[34]

Stridor
Stridor

Auscultation sounds: Stridor

Expiratory wheeze
Expiratory wheeze

Auscultation sounds: Expiratory wheeze

Polyphonic wheeze
Polyphonic wheeze

Auscultation sounds: Polyphonic wheeze

​​

Chest x-ray

This is the initial imaging modality for suspected foreign body aspiration in a stable patient. Standard frontal and lateral views should be obtained to help locate the object.[4] Lateral soft-tissue views of the neck should be performed if upper-airway involvement is suspected clinically. However, if the patient is critical, and suspicion for foreign body aspiration is high based on the history and physical examination, chest radiograph is not necessary. In these cases, an airway should be secured, if needed, and flexible or rigid bronchoscopy considered.

Characteristic findings on a radiograph depend on the density of the aspirated object and the duration of symptoms. Radiopaque materials such as coins, thumb tacks, metallic nails, toys, bones, teeth, and dental appliances can be visualized on radiographs. However, radiopaque foreign bodies are seen in only 2% to 19% of patients with aspirated foreign bodies because most aspirated objects are radiolucent. Of note, radiopaque material seen on radiograph may represent calcification of mucoid impaction or a broncholith and could, therefore, be a false-positive finding.[35]

Organic materials such as meat and vegetables are difficult to visualize.[35] Fish bones from cod, haddock, and salmon are radiopaque, whereas bones from trout, mackerel, and herring are radiolucent.[36] Some pills are radiopaque. 

The sensitivity of chest radiography performed in the emergency department for foreign body aspiration has been reported to be 22.6%.[37] The false-negative rates vary between 5% and 30% in children and between 8% and 80% in adults, probably because of differences in the physical properties of the aspirated materials.

When the aspirated material is radiolucent and not identified on chest radiograph, nonspecific findings that suggest foreign body aspiration include atelectasis, pneumonia, air trapping, and pneumomediastinum. Air trapping is an initial radiographic finding and results from obstruction of the airway by the foreign body, which acts as a ball valve, allowing air to enter the bronchus but not to exit during expiration. Expiratory and inspiratory chest radiographs, when feasible, may help detect any air trapping.[38] In children with aspirated foreign bodies this finding was found to have a negative predictive value of 70%.[14] Bronchiectasis, lung abscess, and empyema are usually late findings. These findings are nonspecific; however, and can be seen with any form of central airway obstruction caused by benign or malignant tumors. Furthermore, a normal chest radiograph is found on average in 25% of cases and, therefore, does not preclude further diagnostic studies. 

Chest computed tomography (CT)

In adults, chest CT can detect foreign bodies not visualized on chest radiograph in up to 80% of cases.[39] This modality is particularly useful in patients with chronic respiratory symptoms or with recurrent pneumonia. False-negative CT scans can occur, especially with 10 mm slice thickness, which can miss small objects, as well as in patients with severe dyspnea, in whom the image quality is compromised by motion artifacts.[4] CT findings include demonstration of the foreign body in the airway lumen, as well as indirect findings such as atelectasis (in 62.5% of cases), hyperlucency (43.75%), bronchiectasis (31.25%), lobar consolidation (18.75%), tree-in-bud opacities (18.75%), ipsilateral pleural effusion (18.75%), ipsilateral lymphadenopathy (31.25%), and thickening of the bronchial wall adjacent to the foreign body (43.75%).

Chest CT can help to reduce the number of negative bronchoscopies performed in pediatric patients.[40] Low-dose multidetector CT (MDCT) scanning with virtual (noninvasive) bronchoscopy can be used to diagnose foreign body aspiration in children, and to determine the exact location of the obstruction before bronchoscopy. It has a sensitivity of 92% to 100% and specificity of 80% to 85%.[41][42]​ False-positives occur because of secretions and endobronchial tumors.

Studies suggest that in the presence of a positive clinical diagnosis and negative chest radiograph, virtual bronchoscopy must be considered in all children with suspected tracheobronchial aspiration to avoid rigid bronchoscopy.[42]

In adults, bronchoscopy should be performed to confirm or to diagnose alternative causes of airway obstruction. [Figure caption and citation for the preceding image starts]: CT of the chest with intravenous contrast material showing complete left lower lobe collapse with a radiopaque object within the left lower main bronchus surrounded by a halo of airBMJ Case Reports 2008 (doi:10.1136/bcr.06.2008.0013). Copyright 2008 BMJ Group Ltd [Citation ends].com.bmj.content.model.Caption@7bbf4d4e

Bronchoscopy

Bronchoscopy determines the exact nature of the foreign body, the location, the degree of airway obstruction, and the associated mucosal abnormalities such as mucosal edema and granulation tissue.

Rigid bronchoscopy should be performed in cases of stridor, asphyxia, radiopaque object on chest radiograph, a history of foreign body aspiration associated with unilaterally decreased breath sounds, localized wheezing, obstructive hyperinflation, or atelectasis.[14][43][44][45]​​ In all other circumstances, flexible bronchoscopy should be performed first for diagnostic confirmation.[14][45]

In stable children with suspected foreign body aspiration, flexible bronchoscopy has been shown to safely confirm the diagnosis and can be used for therapeutic purposes.[5][44][46][47]​​ Flexible bronchoscopy has been shown to provide rapid and definitive diagnosis of foreign body aspiration in children with persistent wheezing.[48] Rigid bronchoscopy is commonly performed for foreign body removal in children, but is associated with high rates of negative initial bronchoscopy (11% to 46%).[14][49]

​Flexible bronchoscopy is a cost-effective procedure in cases of equivocal tracheobronchial foreign body in children, thus avoiding unnecessary rigid bronchoscopy and general anesthesia.[45][50]​​​

In stable adults, flexible bronchoscopy should be used initially to confirm suspected cases of foreign body aspiration and to attempt removal of the foreign body.[4][51][52][53]​ Flexible bronchoscopy is the method of choice in patients with cervicofacial trauma and in those on mechanical ventilation. In these patients, rigid bronchoscopy should be reserved as a therapeutic approach rather than as a diagnostic tool.

Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer