History
History of presenting complaint
Identifying a concomitant history of infection, menses, recent sexual activity, or exercise will avoid an extensive workup. Typically, hematuria due to intense exercise will clear within a few hours.[22]Jones GR, Newhouse IJ, Jakobi JM, et al. The incidence of hematuria in middle distance track running. Can J Appl Physiol. 2001;26:336-349.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11487707?tool=bestpractice.com
The presence of dysuria, urgency, urinary frequency, and suprapubic pressure of pain may indicate urinary tract infection (UTI), cystitis, or prostatitis. Vomiting, rigors, and loin pain can occur in pyelonephritis.
Flank pain, which may radiate to the groin or testis, may indicate nephrolithiasis.
Suprapubic, perineal, or sacral pain can occur in acute prostatitis.
Urine outflow obstruction symptoms such as difficulty voiding, changes in urine volume, nocturia, and terminal dribbling may indicate benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH).
Constitutional symptoms such as weight loss, poor appetite, fever, and malaise can occur in patients with urothelial cancer (previously termed transitional cell carcinoma).
Sore throat, edema, rash, arthralgia, dark urine, and oliguria can occur in acute glomerulonephritis.
Past medical history
Recent streptococcal infection (may precipitate glomerulonephritis)
Recurrent UTIs can occur in patients with anatomic abnormalities of the urinary tract (e.g., bladder diverticulum, nephrolithiasis) or functional abnormalities of the urinary tract (e.g., vesicoureteric reflux)
Nephrolithiasis: after a first renal stone, risk of recurrence is 40% by 5 years and 75% by 20 years[23]Worcester EM, Coe FL. Clinical practice. Calcium kidney stones. N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 2;363(10):954-63.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3192488
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20818905?tool=bestpractice.com
Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) may be complicated by lupus nephritis
Recent instrumentation of the urinary tract.
Family history
Polycystic kidney disease
Glomerular disorders
Renal cell carcinoma: a family history of renal cancer increases risk 2.8- to 4.3-fold[24]Ricketts C, Woodward ER, Killick P, et al. Germline SDHB mutations and familial renal cell carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Sep 3;100(17):1260-2.
https://academic.oup.com/jnci/article/100/17/1260/906270
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18728283?tool=bestpractice.com
Prostate cancer: one large case-control study showed a 2-fold increased risk of prostate cancer in men with a family history in a single first-degree relative, a 5-fold risk if there were two affected relatives, and a relative risk of 10.9 when there were three first-degree relatives with prostate cancer[25]Steinberg GD, Carter BS, Beaty TH, et al. Family history and the risk of prostate cancer. Prostate. 1990;17(4):337-47.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2251225?tool=bestpractice.com
Sickle cell anemia
Coagulation disorders (hypercoagulability increases the risk of renal vein thrombosis)
Alport syndrome.
Drug history
Prolonged use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can lead to papillary necrosis.
Use of anticoagulants should not prevent investigation of NVH.[1]Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):778-86.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001297
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698717?tool=bestpractice.com
Anticoagulation does not predispose patients to hematuria and urinary tract disease is present in most anticoagulated patients with hematuria.[26]Culclasure TF, Bray VJ, Hasbargen JA. The significance of hematuria in the anticoagulated patient. Arch Intern Med. 1994 Mar 28;154(6):649-52.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8129498?tool=bestpractice.com
One case-control study found that exposure to certain antibiotics (sulfas, cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, nitrofurantoin, and broad-spectrum penicillins) in the previous 3-12 months increased the odds of nephrolithiasis.[27]Tasian GE, Jemielita T, Goldfarb DS, et al. Oral antibiotic exposure and kidney stone disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018 Jun;29(6):1731-40.
https://jasn.asnjournals.org/content/29/6/1731.long
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29748329?tool=bestpractice.com
Social history
Occupational exposures other than those to known environmental nephrotoxins may induce NVH.[28]Gun RT, Seymour AE, Mathew TH. A cluster of haematuria cases in a pesticide-manufacturing plant. Occup Med. 1998;48:59-62.
http://occmed.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/reprint/48/1/59
Risk factors for urinary tract cancer
Age: unusual before 35 years of age;[29]Alishahi S, Byrne D, Goodman CM, et al. Haematuria investigation based on a standard protocol: emphasis on the diagnosis of urological malignancy. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2002;47:422-427.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11874263?tool=bestpractice.com
[30]Froom P, Ribak J, Benbassat J. Significance of microhaematuria in young adults. BMJ. 1984;288:20-22.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1444134/pdf/bmjcred00482-0026.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6418299?tool=bestpractice.com
[31]Topham PS, Jethwa A, Watkins M, et al. The value of urine screening in a young adult population. Fam Pract. 2004;21:18-21.
http://fampra.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/full/21/1/18
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14760038?tool=bestpractice.com
risk increases with advancing age beyond 35 years.[1]Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):778-86.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001297
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698717?tool=bestpractice.com
[14]Messing EM, Madeb R, Young T, et al. Long-term outcome of hematuria home screening for bladder cancer in men. Cancer. 2006;107:2173-2179.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.22224/full
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17029275?tool=bestpractice.com
[30]Froom P, Ribak J, Benbassat J. Significance of microhaematuria in young adults. BMJ. 1984;288:20-22.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1444134/pdf/bmjcred00482-0026.pdf
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6418299?tool=bestpractice.com
The incidence below the age of 40 years was found to be 1% to 2.4%.[32]Paner GP, Zehnder P, Amin AM, et al. Urothelial neoplasms of the urinary bladder occurring in young adult and pediatric patients: a comprehensive review of literature with implications for patient management. Adv Anat Pathol. 2011;18:79-89.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21169741?tool=bestpractice.com
Tobacco use
Medications: cyclophosphamide or ifosfamide chemotherapy; aristolochic acid in some herbal weight loss preparations[8]Cohen RA, Brown RS. Microscopic hematuria. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2330-2338.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12788998?tool=bestpractice.com
Past medical history: radiation exposure
Occupational exposures: dyes, benzenes, aromatic amines.
Obesity and hypertension are risk factors for renal cell carcinoma.[12]Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2019 May 1;30(5):706-20.
https://www.esmo.org/guidelines/genitourinary-cancers/renal-cell-carcinoma
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30788497?tool=bestpractice.com
Examination
The physical exam needs to include a search for disorders directly related to the urinary tract, as well as other systemic diseases.[33]Linder BJ, Bass EJ, Mostafid H, et al. Guideline of guidelines: asymptomatic microscopic haematuria. BJU Int. 2018 Feb;121(2):176-83.
https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/bju.14016
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28921833?tool=bestpractice.com
For example, blood pressure can be elevated with upper tract glomerular diseases, and petechiae, bruising, or lymphadenopathy may signal bleeding disorders or blood cell cancers.
Examination of the abdomen and of the external genitalia may also reveal a source for NVH. In men, a digital rectal exam will identify BPH and potentially discover prostate cancer.
The physical exam can, like a detailed history, preclude an extensive evaluation if an obvious source is identified.
Basic laboratory tests
Initial laboratory testing should evaluate for systemic disorders in the appropriate clinical settings and include coagulation studies, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, creatinine, and C-reactive protein. A urine culture will confirm UTI if suspected. Prostate-specific antigen testing aids in identifying the prostate as a source for NVH.
Urine microscopy
Before pursuing any workup, the presence of hematuria should be confirmed by urine microscopy.[1]Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):778-86.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001297
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698717?tool=bestpractice.com
[8]Cohen RA, Brown RS. Microscopic hematuria. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2330-2338.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12788998?tool=bestpractice.com
Urine dipstick testing is highly sensitive for blood but lacks specificity.[8]Cohen RA, Brown RS. Microscopic hematuria. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2330-2338.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12788998?tool=bestpractice.com
[34]Rodgers M, Nixon J, Hempel S, et al. Diagnostic tests and algorithms used in the investigation of haematuria: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10:1-259.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16729917?tool=bestpractice.com
False-positives occur due to povidone-iodine, myoglobin, free hemoglobin, hypochlorite solutions, oxidizing agents, and high levels of ascorbic acid.[4]Tomson C, Porter T. Asymptomatic microscopic or dipstick haematuria in adults: which investigations for which patients? A review of the evidence. BJU Int. 2002;90:185-198.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12133052?tool=bestpractice.com
There is consensus that ≥3 red blood cells (RBCs) per high-power field in two of three centrifuged urine specimens signals NVH.[18]Nielsen M, Qaseem A; High Value Care Task Force of the American College of Physicians. Hematuria as a marker of occult urinary tract cancer: advice for high-value care from the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2016;164:488-497.
http://annals.org/article.aspx?articleid=2484287
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26810935?tool=bestpractice.com
Repeat microscopy should be considered in patients whose urine dipstick is positive for blood but whose urine microscopy is negative, taking into account patient preference and risk of malignancy.[1]Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):778-86.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001297
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698717?tool=bestpractice.com
Microscopy should examine freshly voided midstream urine, immediately after dipstick testing if dipstick testing is performed.[1]Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):778-86.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001297
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698717?tool=bestpractice.com
[34]Rodgers M, Nixon J, Hempel S, et al. Diagnostic tests and algorithms used in the investigation of haematuria: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10:1-259.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16729917?tool=bestpractice.com
Time to analysis of the sample affects the integrity of RBCs: RBC count drops by 5% to 9% after 5 hours and by 29% to 35% after 7 hours.[35]Kouri T, Malminiemi O, Penders J, et al. Limits of preservation of samples for urine strip tests and particle counting. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2008;46(5):703-13.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18839472?tool=bestpractice.com
Microscopy confirms NVH, but it also directs the further workup by identifying dysmorphic RBCs and RBC casts, which suggest an upper tract glomerular source of bleeding.[1]Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):778-86.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001297
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698717?tool=bestpractice.com
[34]Rodgers M, Nixon J, Hempel S, et al. Diagnostic tests and algorithms used in the investigation of haematuria: systematic reviews and economic evaluation. Health Technol Assess. 2006;10:1-259.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16729917?tool=bestpractice.com
Urine protein
The presence of proteinuria and NVH together is highly suggestive of an upper tract glomerular source.[1]Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):778-86.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001297
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698717?tool=bestpractice.com
[4]Tomson C, Porter T. Asymptomatic microscopic or dipstick haematuria in adults: which investigations for which patients? A review of the evidence. BJU Int. 2002;90:185-198.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12133052?tool=bestpractice.com
[20]Shen P, Ding X, Ten J, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics and outcome of adult patients with hematuria and/or proteinuria found during routine examination. Nephron Clin Pract. 2006;103:c149-56.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16636583?tool=bestpractice.com
[36]Yamagata K, Takahashi H, Tomida C, et al. Prognosis of asymptomatic hematuria and/or proteinuria in men. High prevalence of IgA nephropathy among proteinuria patients found in mass screening. Nephron. 2002;91:34-42.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12021517?tool=bestpractice.com
[37]Hall CL, Bradley R, Kerr A, et al. Clinical value of renal biopsy in patients with asymptomatic microscopic hematuria with and without low-grade proteinuria. Clin Nephrol. 2004;62:267-272.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15524056?tool=bestpractice.com
A urine protein to creatinine ratio of ≥0.3 or a urine albumin to total urine protein ratio of ≥0.59 suggests renal parenchymal disease.[8]Cohen RA, Brown RS. Microscopic hematuria. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2330-2338.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12788998?tool=bestpractice.com
[19]Ohisa N, Kanemitsu K, Matsuki R, et al. Evaluation of hematuria using the urinary albumin-to-total-protein ratio to differentiate glomerular and nonglomerular bleeding. Clin Exp Nephrol. 2007;11:61-65.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17385000?tool=bestpractice.com
The latter ratio has a sensitivity of 97% for distinguishing glomerular from nonglomerular bleeding. Nephrology consult is warranted and renal biopsy decisions should be directed by the nephrologist, because most often renal biopsy in patients with NVH does not alter management decisions.[4]Tomson C, Porter T. Asymptomatic microscopic or dipstick haematuria in adults: which investigations for which patients? A review of the evidence. BJU Int. 2002;90:185-198.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12133052?tool=bestpractice.com
[38]McGregor DO, Lynn KL, Bailey RR, et al. Clinical audit of the use of renal biopsy in the management of isolated microscopic hematuria. Clin Nephrol. 1998;49:345-348.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9696429?tool=bestpractice.com
Additionally, renal biopsy is unnecessary if proteinuria does not coexist with hematuria.[8]Cohen RA, Brown RS. Microscopic hematuria. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2330-2338.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12788998?tool=bestpractice.com
Risk stratification
Guidelines from the American Urological Association advise classifying patients into 3 risk categories: low, medium and high.[1]Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):778-86.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001297
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698717?tool=bestpractice.com
Low-risk patients meet all of the following criteria:
Women ages <50 years, men ages <40 years
Never smoker or <10 pack years
3-10 RBC per high power field on a single urine microscopy
No risk factors for urothelial cancer (risk factors include: persistent microhematuria, visible hematuria).
Intermediate risk patients meet one of the following criteria:
Women ages 50-59 years, men ages 40-59 years
10-30 pack year smoking history
11-25 RBC per high power field on a single urine microscopy
Low risk patient with no prior evaluation and 3-10 RBC per high power field on repeat urine microscopy
Additional risk factor for urothelial cancer (additional risk factors include: irritative lower urinary tract symptoms, prior pelvic radiation therapy, prior cyclophosphamide/ifosfamide chemotherapy, family history of urothelial cancer, family history of Lynch syndrome, occupational exposure to aromatic amines or benzene chemicals, chronic indwelling foreign body in the urinary tract).
High risk patients are defined as:
Women and men ages ≥60 years
>30 pack year smoking history
>25 RBC per high power field on a single urine microscopy
History of visible hematuria.
Imaging
Guidelines from the American Urological Association advise further imaging according to risk of urological cancer.[1]Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):778-86.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001297
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698717?tool=bestpractice.com
For low-risk patients, urine microscopy may be repeated in 6 months or the urinary tract may be investigated with renal ultrasound and cystoscopy. If NVH persists on repeat testing, the patient is reclassified as intermediate or high risk. Intermediate-risk patients should be offered renal ultrasound and cystoscopy. High-risk patients should be offered axial renal imaging, ideally with multiphasic computed tomography (CT) urography, and cystoscopy.
Repeat urinalysis within 12 months should be considered for patients whose work up produces a negative result. A positive repeat urinalysis should prompt shared-decision making regarding repeat evaluation or observation.[1]Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):778-86.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001297
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698717?tool=bestpractice.com
Ultrasound
Initial investigation with ultrasound for patients at intermediate risk of malignancy is recommended to reduce exposure to ionizing radiation in a population with a low incidence of renal cell or urothelial carcinoma.[1]Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):778-86.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001297
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698717?tool=bestpractice.com
One model estimated 575 radiation-induced cancers in a cohort of 100,000 patients ages ≥35 years investigated with CT urography for hematuria.[39]Georgieva MV, Wheeler SB, Erim D, et al. Comparison of the harms, advantages, and costs associated with alternative guidelines for the evaluation of hematuria. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179(10):1352-62.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31355874?tool=bestpractice.com
Renal and bladder ultrasound has a sensitivity of 85.7% and a negative predictive value of 99.9% to detect renal cell carcinoma and a sensitivity of 14.3% and negative predictive value of 99.7% to to detect upper tract urothelial carcinoma in patients with hematuria.[40]Tan WS, Sarpong R, Khetrapal P, et al. Can renal and bladder ultrasound replace computerized tomography urogram in patients investigated for microscopic hematuria? J Urol. 2018 Nov;200(5):973-80.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29702097?tool=bestpractice.com
The American College of Radiology recommends that an ultrasound of the kidneys, bladder, and retroperitoneum should be the first-line investigation for patients in whom renal parenchymal disease is the likely cause of hematuria. Ultrasound can evaluate kidney length, echogenicity, cortical thickness, and parenchymal thickness, which provides useful information about disease progression. Echogenicity on ultrasound correlates with histologic changes of glomerulonephritis.[41]American College of Radiology. ACR appropriateness criteria: hematuria. 2019 [internet publication].
https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69490/Narrative
Multiphasic computed tomography (CT) urography
Multiphasic CT urography, with and without contrast, has the highest sensitivity and specificity for detecting renal parenchymal and upper urinary tract lesions, with most studies reporting values of 90% or higher.[1]Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):778-86.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001297
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698717?tool=bestpractice.com
Its use has largely superseded the intravenous urogram (IVU).
There are four distinct phases of multiphasic CT urography:
Pre-enhancement, before giving intravenous contrast, to establish baseline tissue density and identify calculi and hematomas
Arterial, to identify areas of neovascularity
Corticomedullary, to assess renal parenchymal changes
Excretory, to assess the collecting system, ureters, and bladder.[1]Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):778-86.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001297
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698717?tool=bestpractice.com
Alternative imaging techniques
Magnetic resonance (MR) urography is an alternative to multiphasic CT urography for patients with renal insufficiency, allergy to iodinated contrast, pregnancy, or other contraindications to CT urography. Compared with CT, MR urography is less specific for calcifications or small calculi.[41]American College of Radiology. ACR appropriateness criteria: hematuria. 2019 [internet publication].
https://acsearch.acr.org/docs/69490/Narrative
If CT or MR urography is not available, noncontrast CT or renal ultrasound may be combined with retrograde pyelography to assess the renal cortex and urothelium, respectively.[1]Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):778-86.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001297
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698717?tool=bestpractice.com
Noncontrast CT is the preferred investigation for suspected nephrolithiasis.
Cystoscopy
Cystoscopy is recommended as standard in evaluating patients at medium or high risk of malignancy.[1]Barocas DA, Boorjian SA, Alvarez RD, et al. Microhematuria: AUA/SUFU Guideline. J Urol. 2020 Oct;204(4):778-86.
https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000001297
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32698717?tool=bestpractice.com
When a urologic malignancy is detected during evaluation of NVH, it is most commonly bladder cancer.
Cystoscopy has a sensitivity of 98% for the diagnosis of bladder cancer.[42]Blick CG, Nazir SA, Mallett S, et al. Evaluation of diagnostic strategies for bladder cancer using computed tomography (CT) urography, flexible cystoscopy and voided urine cytology: results for 778 patients from a hospital haematuria clinic. BJU Int. 2012 Jul;110(1):84-94.
https://www.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10664.x
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22122739?tool=bestpractice.com
Cystoscopy may also identify other lower urinary tract causes of NVH, e.g., urethral stricture, urethral or bladder diverticulum and benign prostatic hypertrophy.
CT virtual cystoscopy
A noninvasive test that shows promise in the assessment of hematuria. In small prospective and retrospective studies, CT virtual cystoscopy demonstrated high sensitivity for the detection of bladder tumors.[43]Abrol S, Jairath A, Ganpule S, et al. Can CT virtual cystoscopy replace conventional cystoscopy in early detection of bladder cancer? Adv Urol. 2015;2015:926590.
https://www.doi.org/10.1155/2015/926590
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26600802?tool=bestpractice.com
[44]Ibáñez Muñoz D, Quintana Martínez I, Fernández Militino A, et al. Virtual cystoscopy, computed tomography urography and optical cystoscopy for the detection and follow-up for bladder cancer. [in spa]. Radiologia. 2017 Sep - Oct;59(5):422-30.
https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.rx.2017.04.003
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28501271?tool=bestpractice.com
CT virtual cystoscopy can also be used to detect bladder stones, diverticulae and papillomas.