Metastatic breast cancer
- Overview
- Theory
- Diagnosis
- Management
- Follow up
- Resources
Treatment algorithm
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups: see disclaimer
hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, without visceral crisis: post-menopausal
endocrine-based therapy ± CDK4/6 inhibitor
First-line options include a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole or letrozole) as a single agent, or in combination with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor (e.g., ribociclib, abemaciclib, or palbociclib).[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [73]Rugo HS, Rumble B, Macrae E, et al. Endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;34(25):3069-103. http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1487 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217461?tool=bestpractice.com
Combining a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor with a CDK4/6 inhibitor improves progression-free survival compared with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor alone in post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC.[75]Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I, et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jan;16(1):25-35. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25524798?tool=bestpractice.com [76]Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS, et al. Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1925-36. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1607303?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27959613?tool=bestpractice.com [77]Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, et al. Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase III trial of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;29(7):1541-47. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(19)32105-2/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29718092?tool=bestpractice.com [78]Goetz MP, Toi M, Campone M, et al. MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 10;35(32):3638-46. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.6155?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28968163?tool=bestpractice.com Statistically significant improvement in overall survival has been demonstrated when a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor is combined with ribociclib.[79]Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 10;386(10):942-50. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2114663?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35263519?tool=bestpractice.com
CDK4/6 inhibitors are associated with a significant incidence of neutropenia (60%), but febrile neutropenia is less common (incidence <2%).[75]Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I, et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jan;16(1):25-35. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25524798?tool=bestpractice.com [76]Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS, et al. Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1925-36. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1607303?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27959613?tool=bestpractice.com [80]Olson SR, DeLoughery TG, Shatzel JJ. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor-associated thromboembolism. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):141-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30543359?tool=bestpractice.com [81]McAndrew NP, Finn RS. Clinical review on the management of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 May;18(5):319-27. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/OP.21.00384 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34637323?tool=bestpractice.com The US Food and Drug Administration has issued a warning that the CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib, abemaciclib, and palbociclib may cause rare but severe, life-threatening, or fatal interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis.[82]US Food & Drug Administration. FDA warns about rare but severe lung inflammation with Ibrance, Kisqali, and Verzenio for breast cancer. 13 Sep 2019 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-warns-about-rare-severe-lung-inflammation-ibrance-kisqali-and-verzenio-breast-cancer Patients should be advised to report any new or worsening respiratory symptoms and should be appropriately monitored for pulmonary signs or signs indicative of these conditions (e.g., hypoxia, cough, dyspnoea, or interstitial infiltrates on x-rays).
If disease progression occurs following endocrine therapy plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor, it is unclear if continuing CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy with subsequent lines of endocrine therapy is beneficial; studies are ongoing.[83]Martin JM, Handorf EA, Montero AJ, et al. Systemic therapies following progression on first-line CDK4/6-inhibitor treatment: analysis of real-world data. Oncologist. 2022 Jun 8;27(6):441-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177121 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35552450?tool=bestpractice.com [84]Ashai N, Swain SM. Post-CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy: current agents and novel targets. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 20;15(6):1855. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10046856 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980743?tool=bestpractice.com [85]Kalinsky K, Accordino MK, Chiuzan C, et al. Randomized phase II trial of endocrine therapy with or without ribociclib after progression on cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibition in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer: MAINTAIN Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug 20;41(24):4004-13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37207300?tool=bestpractice.com [86]Albanell J, Pérez-García JM, Gil-Gil M, et al. Palbociclib rechallenge for hormone receptor-positive/HER-negative advanced breast cancer: findings from the phase II BioPER trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Jan 4;29(1):67-80. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811162 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36165912?tool=bestpractice.com [87]Mayer EL, Ren Y, Wagle N, et al. Palbociclib after CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy (PACE): a randomized phase II study of fulvestrant, palbociclib, and avelumab for endocrine pre-treated ER+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2023;83 (supplement 5):GS3-06.
Alternative first-line options include: fulvestrant (a selective oestrogen receptor degrader) as a single agent or combined with ribociclib; or tamoxifen (a selective oestrogen receptor modulator).[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [73]Rugo HS, Rumble B, Macrae E, et al. Endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;34(25):3069-103. http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1487 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217461?tool=bestpractice.com [81]McAndrew NP, Finn RS. Clinical review on the management of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 May;18(5):319-27. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/OP.21.00384 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34637323?tool=bestpractice.com
In the metastatic setting, first-line use of fulvestrant is superior to anastrozole, and first-line use of fulvestrant plus ribociclib is superior to fulvestrant plus placebo.[88]Robertson JF, Bondarenko IM, Trishkina E, et al. Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016 Dec 17;388(10063):2997-3005. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27908454?tool=bestpractice.com [89]Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, et al. Phase III randomized study of ribociclib and fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: MONALEESA-3. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 20;36(24):2465-72. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9909?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29860922?tool=bestpractice.com [90]Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 6;382(6):514-24. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1911149 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31826360?tool=bestpractice.com [91]Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, et al. Ribociclib plus fulvestrant for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer in the phase III randomized MONALEESA-3 trial: updated overall survival. Ann Oncol. 2021 Aug;32(8):1015-24. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)01553-2/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34102253?tool=bestpractice.com [92]Neven P, Fasching PA, Chia S, et al. Updated overall survival from the MONALEESA-3 trial in postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer receiving first-line ribociclib plus fulvestrant. Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Aug 31;25(1):103. https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01701-9 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653397?tool=bestpractice.com
First-line use of tamoxifen in the metastatic setting is less effective than aromatase inhibitors at improving progression-free survival in post-menopausal women.[73]Rugo HS, Rumble B, Macrae E, et al. Endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;34(25):3069-103. http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1487 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217461?tool=bestpractice.com [93]Carlini P, Bria E, Giannarelli D, et al. Aromatase inhibitors in post-menopausal metastatic breast carcinoma. Expert opinion on investigational drugs. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2007 Jul;16(7):1023-36. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17594187?tool=bestpractice.com [94]Riemsma R, Forbes CA, Kessels A, et al. Systematic review of aromatase inhibitors in the first-line treatment for hormone sensitive advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Aug;123(1):9-24. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20535542?tool=bestpractice.com [95]Gibson L, Lawrence D, Dawson C, et al. Aromatase inhibitors for treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD003370. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003370.pub3/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19821307?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
anastrozole: 1 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
OR
letrozole: 2.5 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
OR
anastrozole: 1 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
or
letrozole: 2.5 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
-- AND --
ribociclib: 600 mg orally once daily on days 1-21 of each cycle, followed by 7 days off before repeating, until tumour progression
or
abemaciclib: 150 mg orally twice daily until tumour progression
or
palbociclib: 125 mg orally once daily on days 1-21 of each cycle, followed by 7 days off before repeating, until tumour progression
Secondary options
fulvestrant: 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 15, 29, then once monthly until tumour progression
OR
fulvestrant: 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 15, 29, then once monthly until tumour progression
and
ribociclib: 600 mg orally once daily on days 1-21 of each cycle followed by 7 days off before repeating, until tumour progression
OR
tamoxifen: 20 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
exemestane + everolimus; or fulvestrant + CDK4/6 inhibitor; or fulvestrant + alpelisib; or fulvestrant + palbociclib + inavolisib; or fulvestrant + capivasertib; or elacestrant; or exemestane monotherapy
Women with disease progression during endocrine therapy in the adjuvant or metastatic setting, or shortly after completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy (i.e., <2 years), are considered to have endocrine-resistant MBC.
Exemestane (a steroidal aromatase inhibitor) and everolimus (a selective inhibitor of mTOR, a protein kinase required for oestrogen-induced breast tumour cell proliferation) improves progression-free survival compared with exemestane alone in post-menopausal women with endocrine-resistant MBC.[100]Baselga J, Campone M, Piccart M, et al. Everolimus in postmenopausal hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Feb 9;366(6):520-9. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1109653 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22149876?tool=bestpractice.com [101]Pritchard KI, Burris HA 3rd, Ito Y, et al. Safety and efficacy of everolimus with exemestane vs. exemestane alone in elderly patients with HER2-negative, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer in BOLERO-2. Clin Breast Cancer. 2013 Dec;13(6):421-32.e8. https://www.clinical-breast-cancer.com/article/S1526-8209(13)00185-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24267730?tool=bestpractice.com [102]Yardley DA, Noguchi S, Pritchard KI, et al. Everolimus plus exemestane in postmenopausal patients with HR(+) breast cancer: BOLERO-2 final progression-free survival analysis. Adv Ther. 2013 Oct 25;30(10):870-84. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3898123 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24158787?tool=bestpractice.com
Combination therapy with fulvestrant plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor (e.g., palbociclib, ribociclib, or abemaciclib) following disease progression with endocrine therapy improves progression-free survival compared with fulvestrant alone in post-menopausal women with endocrine-resistant MBC.[73]Rugo HS, Rumble B, Macrae E, et al. Endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;34(25):3069-103. http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1487 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217461?tool=bestpractice.com [89]Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, et al. Phase III randomized study of ribociclib and fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: MONALEESA-3. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 20;36(24):2465-72. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9909?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29860922?tool=bestpractice.com [103]Turner NC, Ro J, André F, et al. Palbociclib in hormone-receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jul 16;373(3):209-19. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1505270#t=article http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26030518?tool=bestpractice.com [104]Cristofanilli M, Turner NC, Bondarenko I, et al. Fulvestrant plus palbociclib versus fulvestrant plus placebo for treatment of hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer that progressed on previous endocrine therapy (PALOMA-3): final analysis of the multicentre, double-blind, phase 3 randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):425-39. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26947331?tool=bestpractice.com [105]Valachis A, Mauri D, Polyzos NP, et al. Fulvestrant in the treatment of advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2010 Mar;73(3):220-7. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19369092?tool=bestpractice.com [106]Sledge GW Jr, Toi M, Neven P, et al. MONARCH 2: Abemaciclib in combination with fulvestrant in women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer who had progressed while receiving endocrine therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Sep 1;35(25):2875-84. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.73.7585?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28580882?tool=bestpractice.com Significant improvement in overall survival has been demonstrated with fulvestrant plus ribociclib or abemaciclib (but not palbociclib) in this setting, compared with fulvestrant alone.[90]Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 6;382(6):514-24. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1911149 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31826360?tool=bestpractice.com [91]Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, et al. Ribociclib plus fulvestrant for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer in the phase III randomized MONALEESA-3 trial: updated overall survival. Ann Oncol. 2021 Aug;32(8):1015-24. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)01553-2/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34102253?tool=bestpractice.com [107]Turner NC, Slamon DJ, Ro J, et al. Overall survival with palbociclib and fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1926-36. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1810527?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30345905?tool=bestpractice.com [108]Sledge GW Jr, Toi M, Neven P, et al. The effect of abemaciclib plus fulvestrant on overall survival in hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative breast cancer that progressed on endocrine therapy-MONARCH 2: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2020 Jan 1;6(1):116-24. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2752266 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31563959?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration has issued a warning that the CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib, abemaciclib, and palbociclib may cause rare but severe, life-threatening, or fatal interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis.[82]US Food & Drug Administration. FDA warns about rare but severe lung inflammation with Ibrance, Kisqali, and Verzenio for breast cancer. 13 Sep 2019 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-warns-about-rare-severe-lung-inflammation-ibrance-kisqali-and-verzenio-breast-cancer Patients should be advised to report any new or worsening respiratory symptoms and should be appropriately monitored for pulmonary signs or signs indicative of these conditions (e.g., hypoxia, cough, dyspnoea, or interstitial infiltrates on x-rays).
Fulvestrant plus alpelisib (an alpha-specific phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase [PI3K] inhibitor) improves progression-free survival compared with fulvestrant alone in post-menopausal women with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC who have received prior endocrine therapy.[109]André F, Ciruelos E, Rubovszky G, et al. Alpelisib for PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019 May 16;380(20):1929-40. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31091374?tool=bestpractice.com Significant improvement in overall survival has not been demonstrated.[110]André F, Ciruelos EM, Juric D, et al. Alpelisib plus fulvestrant for PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results from SOLAR-1. Ann Oncol. 2021 Feb;32(2):208-17. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)43166-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33246021?tool=bestpractice.com
Fulvestrant plus palbociclib plus inavolisib (an alpha-specific PI3K inhibitor) significantly improves progression-free survival compared with fulvestrant plus palbociclib in post-menopausal women with PIK3CA-mutated, hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC who have progressed during or within 12 months after the completion of endocrine therapy.[111]Turner NC, Im SA, Saura C, et al. Inavolisib-based therapy in PIK3CA-mutated advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024 Oct 31;391(17):1584-96. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39476340?tool=bestpractice.com
Fulvestrant plus capivasertib (a serine/threonine kinase ATK inhibitor) significantly improves progression-free survival compared with fulvestrant alone in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC with one or more PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations, who have progressed during or following aromatase inhibitor therapy with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor.[112]Turner NC, Oliveira M, Howell SJ, et al. Capivasertib in hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2023 Jun 1;388(22):2058-70. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2214131?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37256976?tool=bestpractice.com
Elacestrant (an oral selective oestrogen receptor degrader) significantly improves progression-free survival in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC who have progressed following one or two lines of prior endocrine therapy, compared with standard treatment used in the endocrine-resistant setting (including fulvestrant, anastrozole, or letrozole).[59]Burstein HJ, DeMichele A, Somerfield MR, et al. Testing for ESR1 mutations to guide therapy for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline rapid recommendation update. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jun 20;41(18):3423-25. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.00638 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37196213?tool=bestpractice.com [113]Bidard FC, Kaklamani VG, Neven P, et al. Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) versus standard endocrine therapy for estrogen receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III EMERALD trial. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Oct 1;40(28):3246-56. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.00338 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35584336?tool=bestpractice.com Significant improvement in progression-free survival was reported in the subgroup of patients with ESR1-mutated tumours, but not in those without ESR1-mutated tumours.
Exemestane as a single agent has been used following tamoxifen failure in post-menopausal women with MBC.[114]Kaufmann M, Bajetta E, Dirix LY, et al. Exemestane is superior to megestrol acetate after tamoxifen failure in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III randomized double-blind trial. The Exemestane Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2000 Apr;18(7):1399-411. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10735887?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
exemestane: 25 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
and
everolimus: 10 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
OR
fulvestrant: 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 15, 29, then once monthly until tumour progression
-- AND --
ribociclib: 600 mg orally once daily on days 1-21 of each cycle followed by 7 days off before repeating, until tumour progression
or
abemaciclib: 150 mg orally twice daily until tumour progression
or
palbociclib: 125 mg orally once daily on days 1-21 of each cycle followed by 7 days off before repeating, until tumour progression
OR
fulvestrant: 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 15, 29, then once monthly until tumour progression
and
alpelisib: 300 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
OR
fulvestrant: 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 15, 29, then once monthly until tumour progression
and
palbociclib: 125 mg orally once daily on days 1-21 of each cycle followed by 7 days off before repeating, until tumour progression
and
inavolisib: 9 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
OR
fulvestrant: 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 15, 29, then once monthly until tumour progression
and
capivasertib: 400 mg orally twice daily on days 1-4 of each 7-day cycle until tumour progression
OR
elacestrant: 345 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
Secondary options
exemestane: 25 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
megestrol
Megestrol is a synthetic progestin that is generally used after other therapies fail. Progestogens are not used earlier because of adverse effects.
Megestrol may be effective in stimulating appetite in women with MBC who have anorexia.[115]Stebbing J, Ngan S. Breast cancer (metastatic). BMJ Clin Evid. 2010 Sep 8;2010:0811. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217794 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21418674?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
megestrol: 160 mg orally once daily
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
chemotherapy or PARP inhibitor
After three lines of endocrine therapy, the likelihood of response to further hormonal manipulation is low.
Chemotherapy may be used at this stage, or at any stage of treatment if visceral crisis develops due to metastatic disease or worsening tumour burden.
Sequential single-agent chemotherapy is recommended. Combination chemotherapy may be considered if a patient has life-threatening disease, visceral crisis, rapid clinical progression, or need for rapid symptom and/or disease control.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [96]Moy B, Rumble RB, Come SE, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer that is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 10;39(35):3938-58. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01374 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34324366?tool=bestpractice.com
The choice of chemotherapy agent is mainly dictated by prior response, toxicity profile of the drugs (e.g., avoiding paclitaxel, with its known neurotoxicity, in patients with pre-existing neuropathy), patient tolerability, and the tumour burden. Most patients will have received multiple agents over time, and this must be considered in the selection of subsequent agents.
Anthracyclines (e.g., doxorubicin, epirubicin) and taxanes (e.g., docetaxel, paclitaxel) have the greatest single-agent activity and are preferred agents, providing that the patient has not been treated with these agents previously.[165]Ghersi D, Willson ML, Chan MM, et al. Taxane-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 10;(6):CD003366. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003366.pub3/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26058962?tool=bestpractice.com
Other formulations of these agents (e.g., pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel [nab-paclitaxel]) are widely used as single-agent therapies for MBC due to their improved toxicity profile.[166]O’Shaughnessy J, Gradishar WJ, Bhar P, et al. Nab-paclitaxel for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer and poor prognostic factors: a retrospective analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;138(3):829-37. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10549-013-2447-8 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23563958?tool=bestpractice.com [167]O'Brien ME, Wigler N, Inbar M, et al; CAELYX Breast Cancer Study Group. Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (CAELYX/Doxil) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004 Mar;15(3):440-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14998846?tool=bestpractice.com
The following single-agent chemotherapy regimens may also be used depending on patient factors (and as indicated): capecitabine or gemcitabine (antimetabolites); vinorelbine or eribulin (microtubule inhibitors); ixabepilone (an epothilone B analogue); cyclophosphamide (an alkylating agent).[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [96]Moy B, Rumble RB, Come SE, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer that is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 10;39(35):3938-58. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01374 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34324366?tool=bestpractice.com
Upon resolution of organ crisis and/or attaining disease stability, chemotherapy may be switched to endocrine therapy.
Patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations who are no longer responding to endocrine therapy can be considered for treatment with a poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (olaparib or talazoparib) instead of chemotherapy.[46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [116]Litton JK, Rugo HS, Ettl J, et al. Talazoparib in patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 15;379(8):753-63. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1802905?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30110579?tool=bestpractice.com [117]Robson M, Im SA, Senkus E, et al. Olaparib for metastatic breast cancer in patients with a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 4;377(6):523-33. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1706450?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578601?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
doxorubicin
OR
epirubicin
OR
docetaxel
OR
paclitaxel
OR
doxorubicin liposomal
OR
paclitaxel nanoparticle albumin-bound
OR
olaparib
OR
talazoparib
Secondary options
capecitabine
OR
gemcitabine
OR
vinorelbine
OR
eribulin
OR
ixabepilone
OR
cyclophosphamide
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
trastuzumab deruxtecan; or sacituzumab govitecan; or abemaciclib monotherapy
Patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-low MBC may be considered for treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan (a monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate combining trastuzumab with a topoisomerase I inhibitor) if they are endocrine-resistant and have received at least one prior line of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting.[97]Moy B, Rumble RB, Carey LA, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer that Is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative: ASCO guideline rapid recommendation update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 10;40(26):3088-90. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01533 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35926153?tool=bestpractice.com [118]Modi S, Jacot W, Yamashita T, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 7;387(1):9-20. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2203690 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35665782?tool=bestpractice.com HER2-low is defined as a HER2 immunohistochemistry score of 1+ or 2+ without amplification on in situ hybridisation.[55]Wolff AC, Somerfield MR, Dowsett M, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: ASCO-College of American Pathologists guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug 1;41(22):3867-72. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.02864 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37284804?tool=bestpractice.com [97]Moy B, Rumble RB, Carey LA, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer that Is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative: ASCO guideline rapid recommendation update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 10;40(26):3088-90. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01533 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35926153?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC who are endocrine-resistant and have received at least two prior lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting may be considered for treatment with sacituzumab govitecan (a monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate combining a Trop-2-directed antibody with a topoisomerase inhibitor).[98]Moy B, Rumble RB, Carey LA, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline rapid recommendation update. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb 20;41(6):1318-20. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.02807 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36626701?tool=bestpractice.com [119]Rugo HS, Bardia A, Marmé F, et al. Overall survival with sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (TROPiCS-02): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023 Oct 21;402(10411):1423-33. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01245-X http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37633306?tool=bestpractice.com
Abemaciclib as a single agent can be considered if there is disease progression following endocrine therapy and chemotherapy (if a CDK4/6 inhibitor has not been used previously).[120]Dickler MN, Tolaney SM, Rugo HS, et al. MONARCH 1, A phase II study of abemaciclib, a CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor, as a single agent, in patients with refractory HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 1;23(17):5218-24. https://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/23/17/5218.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28533223?tool=bestpractice.com The US Food and Drug Administration has issued a warning that the CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib may cause rare but severe, life-threatening, or fatal interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis.[82]US Food & Drug Administration. FDA warns about rare but severe lung inflammation with Ibrance, Kisqali, and Verzenio for breast cancer. 13 Sep 2019 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-warns-about-rare-severe-lung-inflammation-ibrance-kisqali-and-verzenio-breast-cancer Patients should be advised to report any new or worsening respiratory symptoms and should be appropriately monitored for pulmonary signs or signs indicative of these conditions (e.g., hypoxia, cough, dyspnoea, or interstitial infiltrates on x-rays).
Primary options
trastuzumab deruxtecan: consult local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines
OR
sacituzumab govitecan: consult local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines
OR
abemaciclib: 200 mg orally twice daily until tumour progression
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
targeted therapies
Other targeted agents may be considered for MBC patients with certain biomarkers (irrespective of hormone receptor-status and HER2-status) who have progressed following treatment and/or have no satisfactory alternative treatments.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [58]Henry NL, Somerfield MR, Dayao Z, et al. Biomarkers for systemic therapy in metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 20;40(27):3205-21. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01063 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35759724?tool=bestpractice.com
These agents include:[46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [121]Doebele RC, Drilon A, Paz-Ares L, et al. Entrectinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours: integrated analysis of three phase 1-2 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):271-82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461630 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31838007?tool=bestpractice.com [122]Demetri GD, De Braud F, Drilon A, et al. Updated integrated analysis of the efficacy and safety of entrectinib in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Apr 1;28(7):1302-12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365368 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144967?tool=bestpractice.com [123]Drilon A, Laetsch TW, Kummar S, et al. Efficacy of larotrectinib in TRK fusion-positive cancers in adults and children. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):731-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857389 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466156?tool=bestpractice.com [124]Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481136 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028255?tool=bestpractice.com [125]Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, et al. Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1353-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32919526?tool=bestpractice.com [126]André T, Berton D, Curigliano G, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with mismatch repair deficient solid tumors: a nonrandomized controlled trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2341165. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623195 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37917058?tool=bestpractice.com [127]Subbiah V, Wolf J, Konda B, et al. Tumour-agnostic efficacy and safety of selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumours other than lung or thyroid tumours (LIBRETTO-001): a phase 1/2, open-label, basket trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Oct;23(10):1261-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36108661?tool=bestpractice.com [128]Drilon A, Camidge DR, Lin JJ, et al. Repotrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):118-31. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2302299?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38197815?tool=bestpractice.com
entrectinib, larotrectinib, or repotrectinib (tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitors) for patients with NTRK fusion-positive tumours;
pembrolizumab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) tumours, or high tumour mutational burden (TMB-high [≥10 mutations/megabase]);
dostarlimab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with dMMR tumours;
selpercatinib (an RET kinase inhibitor) for patients with RET fusion-positive tumours.
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
entrectinib
OR
larotrectinib
OR
repotrectinib
OR
pembrolizumab
OR
dostarlimab
OR
selpercatinib
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, without visceral crisis: pre-menopausal
tamoxifen and/or ovarian ablation (surgical or medical)
First-line options include tamoxifen and/or ovarian ablation.[46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1
Tamoxifen should be continued until disease progression.
Ovarian ablation is either surgical (oophorectomy) or medical (e.g., gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist, such as goserelin).[129]Taylor CW, Green S, Dalton WS, et al. Multicenter randomized clinical trial of goserelin versus surgical ovariectomy in premenopausal patients with receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: an intergroup study. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Mar;16(3):994-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9508182?tool=bestpractice.com [130]Boccardo F, Rubagotti A, Perotta A, et al. Ovarian ablation versus goserelin with or without tamoxifen in pre-perimenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer: results of a multicentric Italian study. Ann Oncol. 1994 Apr;5(4):337-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8075030?tool=bestpractice.com
It is not clear whether one approach is superior to the other (i.e., tamoxifen vs. ovarian ablation), so ease of administration, patient preference, and tolerability are important considerations.[131]Crump M, Sawka CA, DeBoer G, et al. An individual patient-based meta-analysis of tamoxifen versus ovarian ablation as first-line endocrine therapy for premenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997 Jul;44(3):201-10. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9266099?tool=bestpractice.com [132]Sawka CA, Pritchard KI, Shelley W, et al. A randomized crossover trial of tamoxifen versus ovarian ablation for metastatic breast cancer in premenopausal women: a report of the National Cancer Institute of Canada clinical trials group trial MA1. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997 Jul;44(3):211-5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9266100?tool=bestpractice.com
Once menopausal state is attained following ovarian ablation, subsequent treatment options are the same as those for post-menopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC.
Primary options
tamoxifen: 20 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
endocrine therapy ± CDK4/6 inhibitor (post-ovarian ablation)
Once menopausal state is attained following ovarian ablation, subsequent treatments are the same as those for post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC.
First-line options include a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor (anastrozole or letrozole) as a single agent, or in combination with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor (e.g., ribociclib, abemaciclib, or palbociclib).[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [73]Rugo HS, Rumble B, Macrae E, et al. Endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;34(25):3069-103. http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1487 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217461?tool=bestpractice.com
Combining a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor with a CDK4/6 inhibitor improves progression-free survival compared with a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor alone in post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC.[75]Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I, et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jan;16(1):25-35. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25524798?tool=bestpractice.com [76]Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS, et al. Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1925-36. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1607303?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27959613?tool=bestpractice.com [77]Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, et al. Updated results from MONALEESA-2, a phase III trial of first-line ribociclib plus letrozole versus placebo plus letrozole in hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2018 Jul 1;29(7):1541-47. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(19)32105-2/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29718092?tool=bestpractice.com [78]Goetz MP, Toi M, Campone M, et al. MONARCH 3: Abemaciclib as initial therapy for advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Nov 10;35(32):3638-46. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.6155?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28968163?tool=bestpractice.com Statistically significant improvement in overall survival has been demonstrated when a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor is combined with ribociclib.[79]Hortobagyi GN, Stemmer SM, Burris HA, et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 10;386(10):942-50. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2114663?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35263519?tool=bestpractice.com
CDK4/6 inhibitors are associated with a significant incidence of neutropenia (60%), but febrile neutropenia is less common (incidence <2%).[75]Finn RS, Crown JP, Lang I, et al. The cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib in combination with letrozole versus letrozole alone as first-line treatment of oestrogen receptor-positive, HER2-negative, advanced breast cancer (PALOMA-1/TRIO-18): a randomised phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Jan;16(1):25-35. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25524798?tool=bestpractice.com [76]Finn RS, Martin M, Rugo HS, et al. Palbociclib and letrozole in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2016 Nov 17;375(20):1925-36. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1607303?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27959613?tool=bestpractice.com [80]Olson SR, DeLoughery TG, Shatzel JJ. Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor-associated thromboembolism. JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):141-42. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30543359?tool=bestpractice.com [81]McAndrew NP, Finn RS. Clinical review on the management of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 May;18(5):319-27. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/OP.21.00384 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34637323?tool=bestpractice.com The US Food and Drug Administration has issued a warning that the CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib, abemaciclib, and palbociclib may cause rare but severe, life-threatening, or fatal interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis.[82]US Food & Drug Administration. FDA warns about rare but severe lung inflammation with Ibrance, Kisqali, and Verzenio for breast cancer. 13 Sep 2019 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-warns-about-rare-severe-lung-inflammation-ibrance-kisqali-and-verzenio-breast-cancer Patients should be advised to report any new or worsening respiratory symptoms and should be appropriately monitored for pulmonary signs or signs indicative of these conditions (e.g., hypoxia, cough, dyspnoea, or interstitial infiltrates on x-rays).
If disease progression occurs following endocrine therapy plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor, it is unclear if continuing CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy with subsequent lines of endocrine therapy is beneficial; studies are ongoing.[83]Martin JM, Handorf EA, Montero AJ, et al. Systemic therapies following progression on first-line CDK4/6-inhibitor treatment: analysis of real-world data. Oncologist. 2022 Jun 8;27(6):441-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9177121 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35552450?tool=bestpractice.com [84]Ashai N, Swain SM. Post-CDK 4/6 inhibitor therapy: current agents and novel targets. Cancers (Basel). 2023 Mar 20;15(6):1855. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10046856 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36980743?tool=bestpractice.com [85]Kalinsky K, Accordino MK, Chiuzan C, et al. Randomized phase II trial of endocrine therapy with or without ribociclib after progression on cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibition in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer: MAINTAIN Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug 20;41(24):4004-13. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37207300?tool=bestpractice.com [86]Albanell J, Pérez-García JM, Gil-Gil M, et al. Palbociclib rechallenge for hormone receptor-positive/HER-negative advanced breast cancer: findings from the phase II BioPER trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2023 Jan 4;29(1):67-80. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9811162 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36165912?tool=bestpractice.com [87]Mayer EL, Ren Y, Wagle N, et al. Palbociclib after CDK4/6i and endocrine therapy (PACE): a randomized phase II study of fulvestrant, palbociclib, and avelumab for endocrine pre-treated ER+/HER2-metastatic breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2023;83 (supplement 5):GS3-06.
Alternative first-line options include: fulvestrant (a selective oestrogen receptor degrader) as a single agent or combined with ribociclib; or tamoxifen (a selective oestrogen receptor modulator).[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [73]Rugo HS, Rumble B, Macrae E, et al. Endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;34(25):3069-103. http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1487 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217461?tool=bestpractice.com [81]McAndrew NP, Finn RS. Clinical review on the management of hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022 May;18(5):319-27. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/OP.21.00384 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34637323?tool=bestpractice.com [92]Neven P, Fasching PA, Chia S, et al. Updated overall survival from the MONALEESA-3 trial in postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer receiving first-line ribociclib plus fulvestrant. Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Aug 31;25(1):103. https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01701-9 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653397?tool=bestpractice.com
In the metastatic setting, first-line use of fulvestrant is superior to anastrozole, and first-line use of fulvestrant plus ribociclib is superior to fulvestrant plus placebo.[88]Robertson JF, Bondarenko IM, Trishkina E, et al. Fulvestrant 500 mg versus anastrozole 1 mg for hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer (FALCON): an international, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016 Dec 17;388(10063):2997-3005. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27908454?tool=bestpractice.com [89]Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, et al. Phase III randomized study of ribociclib and fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer: MONALEESA-3. J Clin Oncol. 2018 Aug 20;36(24):2465-72. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2018.78.9909?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29860922?tool=bestpractice.com [90]Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus fulvestrant in advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 6;382(6):514-24. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1911149 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31826360?tool=bestpractice.com [91]Slamon DJ, Neven P, Chia S, et al. Ribociclib plus fulvestrant for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer in the phase III randomized MONALEESA-3 trial: updated overall survival. Ann Oncol. 2021 Aug;32(8):1015-24. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)01553-2/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34102253?tool=bestpractice.com [92]Neven P, Fasching PA, Chia S, et al. Updated overall survival from the MONALEESA-3 trial in postmenopausal women with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer receiving first-line ribociclib plus fulvestrant. Breast Cancer Res. 2023 Aug 31;25(1):103. https://www.doi.org/10.1186/s13058-023-01701-9 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653397?tool=bestpractice.com
First-line use of tamoxifen in the metastatic setting is less effective than aromatase inhibitors at improving progression-free survival in post-menopausal women.[73]Rugo HS, Rumble B, Macrae E, et al. Endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;34(25):3069-103. http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1487 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217461?tool=bestpractice.com [93]Carlini P, Bria E, Giannarelli D, et al. Aromatase inhibitors in post-menopausal metastatic breast carcinoma. Expert opinion on investigational drugs. Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2007 Jul;16(7):1023-36. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17594187?tool=bestpractice.com [94]Riemsma R, Forbes CA, Kessels A, et al. Systematic review of aromatase inhibitors in the first-line treatment for hormone sensitive advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Aug;123(1):9-24. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20535542?tool=bestpractice.com [95]Gibson L, Lawrence D, Dawson C, et al. Aromatase inhibitors for treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD003370. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003370.pub3/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19821307?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
anastrozole: 1 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
OR
letrozole: 2.5 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
OR
anastrozole: 1 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
or
letrozole: 2.5 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
-- AND --
ribociclib: 600 mg orally once daily on days 1-21 of each cycle followed by 7 days off before repeating, until tumour progression
or
abemaciclib: 150 mg orally twice daily until tumour progression
or
palbociclib: 125 mg orally once daily on days 1-21 of each cycle followed by 7 days off before repeating, until tumour progression
Secondary options
fulvestrant: 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 15, 29, then once monthly until tumour progression
OR
fulvestrant: 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 15, 29, then once monthly until tumour progression
and
ribociclib: 600 mg orally once daily on days 1-21 of each cycle followed by 7 days off before repeating, until tumour progression
OR
tamoxifen: 20 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
exemestane + everolimus; or fulvestrant + CDK4/6 inhibitor; or fulvestrant + alpelisib; or fulvestrant + palbociclib + inavolisib; or fulvestrant + capivasertib; or elacestrant; or exemestane monotherapy (post-ovarian ablation)
Once menopausal state is attained following ovarian ablation, subsequent treatments are the same as those for post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC.
Women with disease progression during endocrine therapy in the adjuvant or metastatic setting, or shortly after completion of adjuvant endocrine therapy (i.e., <2 years), are considered to have endocrine-resistant MBC.
Treatment options in the endocrine-resistant setting include:[46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [59]Burstein HJ, DeMichele A, Somerfield MR, et al. Testing for ESR1 mutations to guide therapy for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline rapid recommendation update. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Jun 20;41(18):3423-25. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.23.00638 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37196213?tool=bestpractice.com [73]Rugo HS, Rumble B, Macrae E, et al. Endocrine therapy for hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 1;34(25):3069-103. http://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2016.67.1487 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27217461?tool=bestpractice.com [74]Burstein HJ, Somerfield MR, Barton DL, et al. Endocrine treatment and targeted therapy for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 10;39(35):3959-77. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.21.01392 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34324367?tool=bestpractice.com [96]Moy B, Rumble RB, Come SE, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer that is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 10;39(35):3938-58. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01374 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34324366?tool=bestpractice.com [97]Moy B, Rumble RB, Carey LA, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer that Is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative: ASCO guideline rapid recommendation update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 10;40(26):3088-90. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01533 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35926153?tool=bestpractice.com [98]Moy B, Rumble RB, Carey LA, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline rapid recommendation update. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb 20;41(6):1318-20. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.02807 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36626701?tool=bestpractice.com [99]Burstein HJ, DeMichele A, Fallowfield L, et al. Endocrine and targeted therapy for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer-capivasertib-fulvestrant: ASCO rapid recommendation update. J Clin Oncol. 2024 Apr 20;42(12):1450-3. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.24.00248?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38478799?tool=bestpractice.com
exemestane plus everolimus;
fulvestrant plus a CDK4/6 inhibitor (ribociclib, abemaciclib, or palbociclib);
fulvestrant plus alpelisib (for patients with PIK3CA mutation);
fulvestrant plus palbociclib plus inavolisib (for patients with PIK3CA mutations);
fulvestrant plus capivasertib (for patients with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations who have progressed during or following aromatase inhibitor therapy with or without a CDK4/6 inhibitor);
elacestrant (for patients with ESR1-mutations who have progressed following one or two lines of prior endocrine therapy);
exemestane monotherapy.
The US Food and Drug Administration has issued a warning that the CDK4/6 inhibitors ribociclib, abemaciclib, and palbociclib may cause rare but severe, life-threatening, or fatal interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis.[82]US Food & Drug Administration. FDA warns about rare but severe lung inflammation with Ibrance, Kisqali, and Verzenio for breast cancer. 13 Sep 2019 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-warns-about-rare-severe-lung-inflammation-ibrance-kisqali-and-verzenio-breast-cancer Patients should be advised to report any new or worsening respiratory symptoms and should be appropriately monitored for pulmonary signs or signs indicative of these conditions (e.g., hypoxia, cough, dyspnoea, or interstitial infiltrates on x-rays).
Primary options
exemestane: 25 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
and
everolimus: 10 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
OR
fulvestrant: 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 15, 29, then once monthly until tumour progression
-- AND --
ribociclib: 600 mg orally once daily on days 1-21 of each cycle followed by 7 days off before repeating, until tumour progression
or
abemaciclib: 150 mg orally twice daily until tumour progression
or
palbociclib: 125 mg orally once daily on days 1-21 of each cycle followed by 7 days off before repeating, until tumour progression
OR
fulvestrant: 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 15, 29, then once monthly until tumour progression
and
alpelisib: 300 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
OR
fulvestrant: 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 15, 29, then once monthly until tumour progression
and
palbociclib: 125 mg orally once daily on days 1-21 of each cycle followed by 7 days off before repeating, until tumour progression
and
inavolisib: 9 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
OR
fulvestrant: 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 15, 29, then once monthly until tumour progression
and
capivasertib: 400 mg orally twice daily on days 1-4 of each 7-day cycle until tumour progression
OR
elacestrant: 345 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
Secondary options
exemestane: 25 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
megestrol (post-ovarian ablation)
Once menopausal state is attained following ovarian ablation, subsequent treatments are the same as those for post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC.
Megestrol is a synthetic progestin that is generally used after other therapies fail. Progestogens are not used earlier because of adverse effects.
Megestrol may be effective in stimulating appetite in women with MBC who have anorexia.[115]Stebbing J, Ngan S. Breast cancer (metastatic). BMJ Clin Evid. 2010 Sep 8;2010:0811. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3217794 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21418674?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
megestrol: 160 mg orally once daily
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
chemotherapy or PARP inhibitor (post-ovarian ablation)
Once menopausal state is attained following ovarian ablation, subsequent treatments are the same as those for post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC.
After three lines of endocrine therapy, the likelihood of response to further hormonal manipulation is low.
Chemotherapy may be used at this stage, or at any stage of treatment if visceral crisis develops due to metastatic disease or worsening tumour burden.
Sequential single-agent chemotherapy is recommended. Combination chemotherapy may be considered if a patient has life-threatening disease, visceral crisis, rapid clinical progression, or need for rapid symptom and/or disease control.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [96]Moy B, Rumble RB, Come SE, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer that is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 10;39(35):3938-58. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01374 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34324366?tool=bestpractice.com
The choice of chemotherapy agent is mainly dictated by prior response, toxicity profile of the drugs (e.g., avoiding paclitaxel, with its known neurotoxicity, in patients with pre-existing neuropathy), patient tolerability, and the tumour burden. Most patients will have received multiple agents over time, and this must be considered in the selection of subsequent agents.
Anthracyclines (e.g., doxorubicin, epirubicin) and taxanes (e.g., docetaxel, paclitaxel) have the greatest single-agent activity and are preferred agents, providing that the patient has not been treated with these agents previously.[165]Ghersi D, Willson ML, Chan MM, et al. Taxane-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 10;(6):CD003366. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003366.pub3/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26058962?tool=bestpractice.com
Other formulations of these agents (e.g., pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel [nab-paclitaxel]) are widely used as single-agent therapies for MBC due to their improved toxicity profile.[166]O’Shaughnessy J, Gradishar WJ, Bhar P, et al. Nab-paclitaxel for first-line treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer and poor prognostic factors: a retrospective analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Apr;138(3):829-37. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10549-013-2447-8 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23563958?tool=bestpractice.com [167]O'Brien ME, Wigler N, Inbar M, et al; CAELYX Breast Cancer Study Group. Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (CAELYX/Doxil) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004 Mar;15(3):440-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14998846?tool=bestpractice.com
The following single-agent chemotherapy regimens may also be used depending on patient factors (and as indicated):[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [96]Moy B, Rumble RB, Come SE, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer that is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 10;39(35):3938-58. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01374 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34324366?tool=bestpractice.com
capecitabine or gemcitabine (antimetabolites)
vinorelbine or eribulin (microtubule inhibitors)
ixabepilone (an epothilone B analogue)
cyclophosphamide (an alkylating agent).
Upon resolution of organ crisis and/or attaining disease stability, chemotherapy may be switched to endocrine therapy.
Patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutations who are no longer responding to endocrine therapy can be considered for treatment with a poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor (olaparib or talazoparib) instead of chemotherapy.[46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [116]Litton JK, Rugo HS, Ettl J, et al. Talazoparib in patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 15;379(8):753-63. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1802905?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30110579?tool=bestpractice.com [117]Robson M, Im SA, Senkus E, et al. Olaparib for metastatic breast cancer in patients with a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 4;377(6):523-33. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1706450?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578601?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
doxorubicin
OR
epirubicin
OR
docetaxel
OR
paclitaxel
OR
doxorubicin liposomal
OR
paclitaxel nanoparticle albumin-bound
OR
olaparib
OR
talazoparib
Secondary options
capecitabine
OR
gemcitabine
OR
vinorelbine
OR
eribulin
OR
ixabepilone
OR
cyclophosphamide
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
trastuzumab deruxtecan; or sacituzumab govitecan; or abemaciclib monotherapy (post-ovarian ablation)
Patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-low MBC may be considered for treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan (a monoclonal antibody-drug conjugate combining trastuzumab with a topoisomerase I inhibitor) if they are endocrine-resistant and have received at least one prior line of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting.[97]Moy B, Rumble RB, Carey LA, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer that Is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative: ASCO guideline rapid recommendation update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 10;40(26):3088-90. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01533 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35926153?tool=bestpractice.com [118]Modi S, Jacot W, Yamashita T, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-low advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jul 7;387(1):9-20. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2203690 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35665782?tool=bestpractice.com HER2-low is defined as a HER2 immunohistochemistry score of 1+ or 2+ without amplification on in situ hybridisation.[55]Wolff AC, Somerfield MR, Dowsett M, et al. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 testing in breast cancer: ASCO-College of American Pathologists guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Aug 1;41(22):3867-72. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.22.02864 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37284804?tool=bestpractice.com [97]Moy B, Rumble RB, Carey LA, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer that Is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative: ASCO guideline rapid recommendation update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 10;40(26):3088-90. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01533 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35926153?tool=bestpractice.com
Patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative MBC who are endocrine-resistant and have received at least two prior lines of chemotherapy in the metastatic setting may be considered for treatment with sacituzumab govitecan (an antibody-drug conjugate combining a Trop-2-directed monoclonal antibody with a topoisomerase inhibitor).[98]Moy B, Rumble RB, Carey LA, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline rapid recommendation update. J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb 20;41(6):1318-20. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.02807 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36626701?tool=bestpractice.com [119]Rugo HS, Bardia A, Marmé F, et al. Overall survival with sacituzumab govitecan in hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer (TROPiCS-02): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023 Oct 21;402(10411):1423-33. https://www.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01245-X http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37633306?tool=bestpractice.com
Abemaciclib as a single agent can be considered if there is disease progression following endocrine therapy and chemotherapy (if a CDK4/6 inhibitor has not been used previously).[120]Dickler MN, Tolaney SM, Rugo HS, et al. MONARCH 1, A phase II study of abemaciclib, a CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitor, as a single agent, in patients with refractory HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Sep 1;23(17):5218-24. https://clincancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/23/17/5218.long http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28533223?tool=bestpractice.com The US Food and Drug Administration has issued a warning that the CDK4/6 inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib may cause rare but severe, life-threatening, or fatal interstitial lung disease and pneumonitis.[82]US Food & Drug Administration. FDA warns about rare but severe lung inflammation with Ibrance, Kisqali, and Verzenio for breast cancer. 13 Sep 2019 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-warns-about-rare-severe-lung-inflammation-ibrance-kisqali-and-verzenio-breast-cancer Patients should be advised to report any new or worsening respiratory symptoms and should be appropriately monitored for pulmonary signs or signs indicative of these conditions (e.g., hypoxia, cough, dyspnoea, or interstitial infiltrates on x-rays).
Primary options
trastuzumab deruxtecan: consult local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines
OR
sacituzumab govitecan: consult local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines
OR
abemaciclib: 200 mg orally twice daily until tumour progression
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
targeted therapies (post-ovarian ablation)
Other targeted agents may be considered for MBC patients with certain biomarkers (irrespective of hormone receptor-status and HER2-status) who have progressed following treatment and/or have no satisfactory alternative treatments.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [58]Henry NL, Somerfield MR, Dayao Z, et al. Biomarkers for systemic therapy in metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 20;40(27):3205-21. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01063 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35759724?tool=bestpractice.com
These agents include:[46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [121]Doebele RC, Drilon A, Paz-Ares L, et al. Entrectinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours: integrated analysis of three phase 1-2 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):271-82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461630 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31838007?tool=bestpractice.com [122]Demetri GD, De Braud F, Drilon A, et al. Updated integrated analysis of the efficacy and safety of entrectinib in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Apr 1;28(7):1302-12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365368 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144967?tool=bestpractice.com [123]Drilon A, Laetsch TW, Kummar S, et al. Efficacy of larotrectinib in TRK fusion-positive cancers in adults and children. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):731-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857389 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466156?tool=bestpractice.com [124]Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481136 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028255?tool=bestpractice.com [125]Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, et al. Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1353-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32919526?tool=bestpractice.com [126]André T, Berton D, Curigliano G, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with mismatch repair deficient solid tumors: a nonrandomized controlled trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2341165. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623195 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37917058?tool=bestpractice.com [127]Subbiah V, Wolf J, Konda B, et al. Tumour-agnostic efficacy and safety of selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumours other than lung or thyroid tumours (LIBRETTO-001): a phase 1/2, open-label, basket trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Oct;23(10):1261-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36108661?tool=bestpractice.com [128]Drilon A, Camidge DR, Lin JJ, et al. Repotrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):118-31. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2302299?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38197815?tool=bestpractice.com
entrectinib, larotrectinib, or repotrectinib (tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitors) for patients with NTRK fusion-positive tumours;
pembrolizumab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) tumours, or high tumour mutational burden (TMB-high [≥10 mutations/megabase]);
dostarlimab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with dMMR tumours;
selpercatinib (an RET kinase inhibitor) for patients with RET fusion-positive tumours.
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
entrectinib
OR
larotrectinib
OR
repotrectinib
OR
pembrolizumab
OR
dostarlimab
OR
selpercatinib
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive, without visceral crisis: post-menopausal
pertuzumab + trastuzumab + a taxane
For women able to tolerate chemotherapy, dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab, in combination with a taxane (docetaxel or paclitaxel) is first-line treatment.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com Patients with congestive heart failure or a low ventricular ejection fraction may need further consideration before initiating HER2 blockade therapy.
Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel significantly improves progression-free survival and overall survival compared with placebo plus trastuzumab and docetaxel when used as first-line treatment for HER2-positive MBC.[134]Baselga J, Cortés J, Kim SB, et al; CLEOPATRA Study Group. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):109-19. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1113216 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22149875?tool=bestpractice.com [135]Swain SM, Baselga J, Kim SB, et al; CLEOPATRA Study Group. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):724-34. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1413513#t=article http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25693012?tool=bestpractice.com [136]Swain SM, Miles D, Kim SB, et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA): end-of-study results from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Apr;21(4):519-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32171426?tool=bestpractice.com
Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel can be prescribed regardless of hormone receptor status.[133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com
Use of pertuzumab is associated with a significant incidence of rash and diarrhoea.[137]Drucker AM, Wu S, Dang CT, et al. Risk of rash with the anti-HER2 dimerization antibody pertuzumab: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Sep;135(2):347-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22782294?tool=bestpractice.com
A fixed-dose formulation of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection is available, which may offer more convenient dosing for patients.[138]Tan AR, Im SA, Mattar A, et al. Fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection plus chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer (FeDeriCa): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):85-97. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357420?tool=bestpractice.com
Alternative first-line options are available for patients unable to tolerate chemotherapy.
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
pertuzumab
-- AND --
trastuzumab
-- AND --
docetaxel
or
paclitaxel
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
trastuzumab + an aromatase inhibitor (non-candidate for chemotherapy)
Trastuzumab plus an aromatase inhibitor is a first-line option for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive post-menopausal women who are unable to tolerate chemotherapy, or who have a poor performance status.
This combination improves progression-free survival and overall response rate compared with aromatase inhibitor alone.[139]Kaufman B, Mackey JR, Clemens MR, et al. Trastuzumab plus anastrozole versus anastrozole alone for the treatment of postmenopausal women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III TAnDEM study. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 20;27(33):5529-37. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6847 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19786670?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
trastuzumab: see local specialist protocol for dosing guideline
-- AND --
anastrozole: 1 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
or
letrozole: 2.5 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
or
exemestane: 25 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
trastuzumab deruxtecan
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (an antibody-drug conjugate combining trastuzumab with a topoisomerase I inhibitor) is the preferred second-line treatment following progression with first-line trastuzumab-based therapy.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com
Trastuzumab deruxtecan significantly improves progression-free survival compared with trastuzumab emtansine (an antibody-drug conjugate combining trastuzumab with the microtubule-inhibitory agent DM1) in patients with HER2-positive MBC who have previously received trastuzumab plus a taxane.[140]Cortés J, Kim SB, Chung WP, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 24;386(12):1143-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320644?tool=bestpractice.com [141]Hurvitz SA, Hegg R, Chung WP, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated results from DESTINY-Breast03, a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023 Jan 14;401(10371):105-17. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02420-5/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36495879?tool=bestpractice.com
Close monitoring for pulmonary toxicity is required with use of trastuzumab deruxtecan.[142]Modi S, Saura C, Yamashita T, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 13;382(7):610-21. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1914510 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31825192?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
trastuzumab deruxtecan
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
tucatinib + trastuzumab + capecitabine (for patients with active brain metastases)
Tucatinib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting HER2) plus trastuzumab and capecitabine is a second-line option if patients have active brain metastases following progression with first-line trastuzumab-based therapy.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [143]Ramakrishna N, Anders CK, Lin NU, et al. Management of advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2636-55. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00520 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640075?tool=bestpractice.com
Tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine improves progression-free survival and overall survival compared with placebo plus trastuzumab and capecitabine in patients with previously treated HER2-positive MBC, including those with brain metastases.[144]Murthy RK, Loi S, Okines A, et al. Tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 13;382(7):597-609. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1914609 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31825569?tool=bestpractice.com [145]Lin NU, Murthy RK, Abramson V, et al. Tucatinib vs placebo, both in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine, for previously treated ERBB2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer in patients with brain metastases: updated exploratory analysis of the HER2CLIMB randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2022 Dec 1;e225610. [Epub ahead of print]. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2799133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36454580?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
tucatinib
and
trastuzumab
and
capecitabine
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
individualised treatment
The optimal sequence for third-line treatment and beyond is unclear; therefore, treatment decisions should be individualised (e.g., based on prior treatments, patient comorbidities, disease burden, treatment toxicity profile).[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com
The following treatments can be considered upon further progression (i.e., third-line and beyond) if not used previously: trastuzumab deruxtecan; tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine; trastuzumab emtansine; lapatinib plus capecitabine; margetuximab plus chemotherapy; neratinib plus capecitabine; trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (except anthracyclines); trastuzumab plus lapatinib; trastuzumab monotherapy; endocrine therapy alone (in highly selected patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive MBC); or other targeted agents (depending on biomarker status).[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com
Trastuzumab deruxtecan or tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine (if patients have active brain metastases) can be used as a third-line treatment if not used as a second-line treatment.
Trastuzumab emtansine may be considered after second-line treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan, or if trastuzumab deruxtecan is unsuitable.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [140]Cortés J, Kim SB, Chung WP, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 24;386(12):1143-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320644?tool=bestpractice.com [141]Hurvitz SA, Hegg R, Chung WP, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated results from DESTINY-Breast03, a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023 Jan 14;401(10371):105-17. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02420-5/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36495879?tool=bestpractice.com
Lapatinib (a HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor) plus capecitabine is approved for use in patients with HER2-positive MBC who have received two or more prior HER2-targeted treatments in the metastatic setting.[146]Geyer CE, Forster J, Lindquist D, et al. Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 28;355(26):2733-43. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa064320 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17192538?tool=bestpractice.com
Margetuximab (an anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody) plus chemotherapy is approved in the US for use in patients with HER2-positive MBC who have received two or more prior HER2-targeted treatments, at least one of which was in the metastatic setting.[147]Rugo HS, Im SA, Cardoso F, et al. Efficacy of margetuximab vs trastuzumab in patients with pretreated ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;7(4):573-84. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2775599 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33480963?tool=bestpractice.com Margetuximab is not approved in Europe.
Neratinib (an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor) plus capecitabine is approved in the US for use in patients with HER2-positive MBC who have received two or more prior HER2-targeted treatments in the metastatic setting.[148]Saura C, Oliveira M, Feng YH, et al. Neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with ≥ 2 HER2-directed regimens: phase III NALA trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3138-49. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.20.00147 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678716?tool=bestpractice.com Neratinib is not approved for this indication in Europe.
Trastuzumab may be continued beyond progression, often in combination with different chemotherapy regimens (e.g., use of trastuzumab plus vinorelbine following progression with trastuzumab plus taxane).[149]von Minckwitz G, du Bois A, Schmidt M, et al. Trastuzumab beyond progression in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer: a German Breast Group 26/Breast International Group 03-05 study. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 20;27(12):1999-2006. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6618?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19289619?tool=bestpractice.com [150]Gori S, Montemurro F, Spazzapan S, et al. Retreatment with trastuzumab-based therapy after disease progression following lapatinib in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012 Jun;23(6):1436-41. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(19)38710-1/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22039084?tool=bestpractice.com Trastuzumab is effective with anthracyclines or taxanes, improving response rate and overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone.[151]Balduzzi S, Mantarro S, Guarneri V, et al. Trastuzumab-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 12;(6):CD006242. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006242.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24919460?tool=bestpractice.com [152]Baselga J, Tripathy D, Mendelsohn J, et al. Phase II study of weekly intravenous recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2 monoclonal antibody in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Mar;14(3):737-44. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8622019?tool=bestpractice.com However, the combination of anthracyclines with trastuzumab is not recommended as it leads to greater cardiac toxicity.
Trastuzumab plus lapatinib is a chemotherapy-free option that may be considered for patients unsuitable for chemotherapy.[153]Blackwell KL, Burstein HJ, Storniolo AM, et al. Randomized study of lapatinib alone or in combination with trastuzumab in women with ErbB2-positive, trastuzumab-refractory metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1124-30. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4437 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20124187?tool=bestpractice.com [154]Blackwell KL, Burstein HJ, Storniolo AM, et al. Overall survival benefit with lapatinib in combination with trastuzumab for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer: final results from the EGF104900 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 20;30(21):2585-92. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2011.35.6725 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22689807?tool=bestpractice.com
Endocrine therapy alone may be an option for highly selected patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive MBC, such as those who are unsuitable for chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapies, or who have low disease burden or a long disease-free interval.[133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com
Other targeted agents may be considered for MBC patients with certain biomarkers (irrespective of hormone receptor-status and HER2-status) who have progressed following treatment and/or have no satisfactory alternative treatments.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [58]Henry NL, Somerfield MR, Dayao Z, et al. Biomarkers for systemic therapy in metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 20;40(27):3205-21. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01063 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35759724?tool=bestpractice.com
These agents include:[46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [121]Doebele RC, Drilon A, Paz-Ares L, et al. Entrectinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours: integrated analysis of three phase 1-2 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):271-82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461630 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31838007?tool=bestpractice.com [122]Demetri GD, De Braud F, Drilon A, et al. Updated integrated analysis of the efficacy and safety of entrectinib in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Apr 1;28(7):1302-12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365368 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144967?tool=bestpractice.com [123]Drilon A, Laetsch TW, Kummar S, et al. Efficacy of larotrectinib in TRK fusion-positive cancers in adults and children. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):731-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857389 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466156?tool=bestpractice.com [124]Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481136 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028255?tool=bestpractice.com [125]Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, et al. Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1353-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32919526?tool=bestpractice.com [126]André T, Berton D, Curigliano G, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with mismatch repair deficient solid tumors: a nonrandomized controlled trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2341165. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623195 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37917058?tool=bestpractice.com [127]Subbiah V, Wolf J, Konda B, et al. Tumour-agnostic efficacy and safety of selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumours other than lung or thyroid tumours (LIBRETTO-001): a phase 1/2, open-label, basket trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Oct;23(10):1261-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36108661?tool=bestpractice.com [128]Drilon A, Camidge DR, Lin JJ, et al. Repotrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):118-31. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2302299?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38197815?tool=bestpractice.com
entrectinib, larotrectinib, or repotrectinib (tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitors) for patients with NTRK fusion-positive tumours;
pembrolizumab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) tumours, or high tumour mutational burden (TMB-high [≥10 mutations/megabase]);
dostarlimab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with dMMR tumours;
selpercatinib (an RET kinase inhibitor) for patients with RET fusion-positive tumours.
See local specialist protocol for choice of regimen and dosing guidelines.
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive, without visceral crisis: pre-menopausal
pertuzumab + trastuzumab + a taxane
For women able to tolerate chemotherapy, dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab, in combination with a taxane (docetaxel or paclitaxel) is first-line treatment.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com Patients with congestive heart failure or a low ventricular ejection fraction may need further consideration before initiating HER2 blockade therapy.
Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel significantly improves progression-free survival and overall survival compared with placebo plus trastuzumab and docetaxel when used as first-line treatment for HER2-positive MBC.[134]Baselga J, Cortés J, Kim SB, et al; CLEOPATRA Study Group. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):109-19. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1113216 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22149875?tool=bestpractice.com [135]Swain SM, Baselga J, Kim SB, et al; CLEOPATRA Study Group. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):724-34. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1413513#t=article http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25693012?tool=bestpractice.com [136]Swain SM, Miles D, Kim SB, et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA): end-of-study results from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Apr;21(4):519-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32171426?tool=bestpractice.com
Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel can be prescribed regardless of hormone receptor status.[133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com
Use of pertuzumab is associated with a significant incidence of rash and diarrhoea.[137]Drucker AM, Wu S, Dang CT, et al. Risk of rash with the anti-HER2 dimerization antibody pertuzumab: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Sep;135(2):347-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22782294?tool=bestpractice.com
A fixed-dose formulation of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection is available, which may offer more convenient dosing for patients.[138]Tan AR, Im SA, Mattar A, et al. Fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection plus chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer (FeDeriCa): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):85-97. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357420?tool=bestpractice.com
Alternative first-line options are available for patients unable to tolerate chemotherapy.
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
pertuzumab
-- AND --
trastuzumab
-- AND --
docetaxel
or
paclitaxel
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
tamoxifen and/or ovarian ablation (surgical or medical) plus trastuzumab (non-candidate for chemotherapy)
Tamoxifen and/or ovarian ablation plus trastuzumab is the first-line option for pre-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive MBC who are unable to tolerate chemotherapy, or who have a poor performance status.
Ovarian ablation is either surgical (oophorectomy) or medical (e.g., gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist, such as goserelin).
It is not clear whether one approach is superior to the other (i.e., tamoxifen vs. ovarian ablation), so ease of administration, patient preference, and tolerability are important considerations.
Sequential endocrine therapy plus trastuzumab is given thereafter as appropriate.
Primary options
tamoxifen: 20 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
and
trastuzumab: see local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines
sequential endocrine therapy plus trastuzumab (post-ovarian ablation)
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Once menopausal state is attained following ovarian ablation, subsequent treatment can be the same as those for post-menopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive MBC.
In women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive MBC, trastuzumab in combination with aromatase inhibitors improves progression-free survival and overall response rate compared with aromatase inhibitor alone.[139]Kaufman B, Mackey JR, Clemens MR, et al. Trastuzumab plus anastrozole versus anastrozole alone for the treatment of postmenopausal women with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive, hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: results from the randomized phase III TAnDEM study. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Nov 20;27(33):5529-37. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2008.20.6847 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19786670?tool=bestpractice.com
Primary options
anastrozole: 1 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
or
letrozole: 2.5 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
or
exemestane: 25 mg orally once daily until tumour progression
or
fulvestrant: 500 mg intramuscularly on days 1, 15, 29, then once monthly until tumour progression
-- AND --
trastuzumab: see local specialist protocol for dosing guideline
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
trastuzumab deruxtecan (post-ovarian ablation)
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (an antibody-drug conjugate combining trastuzumab with a topoisomerase I inhibitor) is the preferred second-line treatment following progression with first-line trastuzumab-based therapy.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com
Trastuzumab deruxtecan significantly improves progression-free survival compared with trastuzumab emtansine (an antibody-drug conjugate combining trastuzumab with the microtubule-inhibitory agent DM1) in patients with HER2-positive MBC who have previously received trastuzumab plus a taxane.[140]Cortés J, Kim SB, Chung WP, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 24;386(12):1143-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320644?tool=bestpractice.com [141]Hurvitz SA, Hegg R, Chung WP, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated results from DESTINY-Breast03, a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023 Jan 14;401(10371):105-17. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02420-5/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36495879?tool=bestpractice.com Close monitoring for pulmonary toxicity is required with use of trastuzumab deruxtecan.[142]Modi S, Saura C, Yamashita T, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 13;382(7):610-21. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1914510 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31825192?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
trastuzumab deruxtecan
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
tucatinib + trastuzumab + capecitabine (for patients with active brain metastases) (post-ovarian ablation)
Tucatinib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting HER2) plus trastuzumab and capecitabine is a second-line option if patients have active brain metastases following progression with first-line trastuzumab-based therapy.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [143]Ramakrishna N, Anders CK, Lin NU, et al. Management of advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2636-55. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00520 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640075?tool=bestpractice.com
Tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine improves progression-free survival and overall survival compared with placebo plus trastuzumab and capecitabine in patients with previously treated HER2-positive MBC, including those with brain metastases.[144]Murthy RK, Loi S, Okines A, et al. Tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 13;382(7):597-609. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1914609 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31825569?tool=bestpractice.com [145]Lin NU, Murthy RK, Abramson V, et al. Tucatinib vs placebo, both in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine, for previously treated ERBB2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer in patients with brain metastases: updated exploratory analysis of the HER2CLIMB randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2022 Dec 1;e225610. [Epub ahead of print]. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2799133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36454580?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
tucatinib
and
trastuzumab
and
capecitabine
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
individualised treatment (post-ovarian ablation)
The optimal sequence for third-line treatment and beyond is unclear; therefore, treatment decisions should be individualised (e.g., based on prior treatments, patient comorbidities, disease burden, treatment toxicity profile).[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com
The following treatments can be considered upon further progression (i.e., third-line and beyond) if not used previously: trastuzumab deruxtecan; tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine; trastuzumab emtansine; lapatinib plus capecitabine; margetuximab plus chemotherapy; neratinib plus capecitabine; trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (except anthracyclines); trastuzumab plus lapatinib; trastuzumab monotherapy; endocrine therapy alone (in highly selected patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive MBC); or other targeted agents (depending on biomarker status).[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com
Trastuzumab deruxtecan or tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine (if patients have active brain metastases) can be used as a third-line treatment if not used as a second-line treatment.
Trastuzumab emtansine may be considered after second-line treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan, or if trastuzumab deruxtecan is unsuitable.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [140]Cortés J, Kim SB, Chung WP, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 24;386(12):1143-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320644?tool=bestpractice.com [141]Hurvitz SA, Hegg R, Chung WP, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated results from DESTINY-Breast03, a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023 Jan 14;401(10371):105-17. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02420-5/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36495879?tool=bestpractice.com
Lapatinib (a HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor) plus capecitabine is approved for use in patients with HER2-positive MBC who have received two or more prior HER2-targeted treatments in the metastatic setting.[146]Geyer CE, Forster J, Lindquist D, et al. Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 28;355(26):2733-43. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa064320 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17192538?tool=bestpractice.com
Margetuximab (an anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody) plus chemotherapy is approved in the US for use in patients with HER2-positive MBC who have received two or more prior HER2-targeted treatments, at least one of which was in the metastatic setting.[147]Rugo HS, Im SA, Cardoso F, et al. Efficacy of margetuximab vs trastuzumab in patients with pretreated ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;7(4):573-84. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2775599 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33480963?tool=bestpractice.com Margetuximab is not approved in Europe.
Neratinib (an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor) plus capecitabine is approved in the US for use in patients with HER2-positive MBC who have received two or more prior HER2-targeted treatments in the metastatic setting.[148]Saura C, Oliveira M, Feng YH, et al. Neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with ≥ 2 HER2-directed regimens: phase III NALA trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3138-49. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.20.00147 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678716?tool=bestpractice.com Neratinib is not approved for this indication in Europe.
Trastuzumab may be continued beyond progression, often in combination with different chemotherapy regimens (e.g., use of trastuzumab plus vinorelbine following progression with trastuzumab plus taxane).[149]von Minckwitz G, du Bois A, Schmidt M, et al. Trastuzumab beyond progression in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer: a German Breast Group 26/Breast International Group 03-05 study. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 20;27(12):1999-2006. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6618?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19289619?tool=bestpractice.com [150]Gori S, Montemurro F, Spazzapan S, et al. Retreatment with trastuzumab-based therapy after disease progression following lapatinib in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012 Jun;23(6):1436-41. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(19)38710-1/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22039084?tool=bestpractice.com Trastuzumab is effective with anthracyclines or taxanes, improving response rate and overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone.[151]Balduzzi S, Mantarro S, Guarneri V, et al. Trastuzumab-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 12;(6):CD006242. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006242.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24919460?tool=bestpractice.com [152]Baselga J, Tripathy D, Mendelsohn J, et al. Phase II study of weekly intravenous recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2 monoclonal antibody in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Mar;14(3):737-44. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8622019?tool=bestpractice.com However, the combination of anthracyclines with trastuzumab is not recommended as it leads to greater cardiac toxicity.
Trastuzumab plus lapatinib is a chemotherapy-free option that may be considered for patients unsuitable for chemotherapy.[153]Blackwell KL, Burstein HJ, Storniolo AM, et al. Randomized study of lapatinib alone or in combination with trastuzumab in women with ErbB2-positive, trastuzumab-refractory metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1124-30. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4437 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20124187?tool=bestpractice.com [154]Blackwell KL, Burstein HJ, Storniolo AM, et al. Overall survival benefit with lapatinib in combination with trastuzumab for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer: final results from the EGF104900 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 20;30(21):2585-92. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2011.35.6725 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22689807?tool=bestpractice.com
Endocrine therapy alone may be an option for highly selected patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-positive MBC, such as those who are unsuitable for chemotherapy and HER2-targeted therapies, or who have low disease burden or a long disease-free interval.[133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com
Other targeted agents may be considered for MBC patients with certain biomarkers (irrespective of hormone receptor-status and HER2-status) who have progressed following treatment and/or have no satisfactory alternative treatments.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [58]Henry NL, Somerfield MR, Dayao Z, et al. Biomarkers for systemic therapy in metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 20;40(27):3205-21. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01063 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35759724?tool=bestpractice.com
These agents include:[46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [121]Doebele RC, Drilon A, Paz-Ares L, et al. Entrectinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours: integrated analysis of three phase 1-2 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):271-82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461630 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31838007?tool=bestpractice.com [122]Demetri GD, De Braud F, Drilon A, et al. Updated integrated analysis of the efficacy and safety of entrectinib in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Apr 1;28(7):1302-12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365368 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144967?tool=bestpractice.com [123]Drilon A, Laetsch TW, Kummar S, et al. Efficacy of larotrectinib in TRK fusion-positive cancers in adults and children. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):731-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857389 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466156?tool=bestpractice.com [124]Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481136 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028255?tool=bestpractice.com [125]Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, et al. Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1353-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32919526?tool=bestpractice.com [126]André T, Berton D, Curigliano G, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with mismatch repair deficient solid tumors: a nonrandomized controlled trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2341165. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623195 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37917058?tool=bestpractice.com [127]Subbiah V, Wolf J, Konda B, et al. Tumour-agnostic efficacy and safety of selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumours other than lung or thyroid tumours (LIBRETTO-001): a phase 1/2, open-label, basket trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Oct;23(10):1261-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36108661?tool=bestpractice.com [128]Drilon A, Camidge DR, Lin JJ, et al. Repotrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):118-31. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2302299?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38197815?tool=bestpractice.com
entrectinib, larotrectinib, or repotrectinib (tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitors) for patients with NTRK fusion-positive tumours
pembrolizumab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) tumours, or high tumour mutational burden (TMB-high [≥10 mutations/megabase]);
dostarlimab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with dMMR tumours;
selpercatinib (an RET kinase inhibitor) for patients with RET fusion-positive tumours.
See local specialist protocol for choice of regimen and dosing guidelines.
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
hormone receptor-negative, HER2-positive, without visceral crisis
pertuzumab + trastuzumab + a taxane; or trastuzumab monotherapy (non-candidate for chemotherapy)
For women able to tolerate chemotherapy, dual HER2 blockade with trastuzumab and pertuzumab, in combination with a taxane (docetaxel or paclitaxel) is first-line treatment.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com Patients with congestive heart failure or a low ventricular ejection fraction may need further consideration before initiating HER2 blockade therapy.
Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel significantly improves progression-free survival and overall survival, compared with placebo plus trastuzumab and docetaxel when used as first-line treatment for HER2-positive MBC.[134]Baselga J, Cortés J, Kim SB, et al; CLEOPATRA Study Group. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):109-19. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1113216 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22149875?tool=bestpractice.com [135]Swain SM, Baselga J, Kim SB, et al; CLEOPATRA Study Group. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):724-34. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1413513#t=article http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25693012?tool=bestpractice.com [136]Swain SM, Miles D, Kim SB, et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA): end-of-study results from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Apr;21(4):519-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32171426?tool=bestpractice.com
Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel can be prescribed regardless of hormone receptor status.[133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com
Use of pertuzumab is associated with a significant incidence of rash and diarrhoea.[137]Drucker AM, Wu S, Dang CT, et al. Risk of rash with the anti-HER2 dimerization antibody pertuzumab: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Sep;135(2):347-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22782294?tool=bestpractice.com
A fixed-dose formulation of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection is available, which may offer more convenient dosing for patients.[138]Tan AR, Im SA, Mattar A, et al. Fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection plus chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer (FeDeriCa): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):85-97. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357420?tool=bestpractice.com
Trastuzumab as a single agent may be considered for women who cannot tolerate chemotherapy or who have poor performance status.
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
pertuzumab
-- AND --
trastuzumab
-- AND --
docetaxel
or
paclitaxel
OR
trastuzumab
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
trastuzumab deruxtecan
Trastuzumab deruxtecan (an antibody-drug conjugate combining trastuzumab with a topoisomerase I inhibitor) is the preferred second-line treatment following progression with first-line trastuzumab-based therapy.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com
Trastuzumab deruxtecan significantly improves progression-free survival compared with trastuzumab emtansine (an antibody-drug conjugate combining trastuzumab with the microtubule-inhibitory agent DM1) in patients with HER2-positive MBC who have previously received trastuzumab plus a taxane.[140]Cortés J, Kim SB, Chung WP, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 24;386(12):1143-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320644?tool=bestpractice.com [141]Hurvitz SA, Hegg R, Chung WP, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated results from DESTINY-Breast03, a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023 Jan 14;401(10371):105-17. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02420-5/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36495879?tool=bestpractice.com Close monitoring for pulmonary toxicity is required with use of trastuzumab deruxtecan.[142]Modi S, Saura C, Yamashita T, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 13;382(7):610-21. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1914510 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31825192?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
trastuzumab deruxtecan
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
tucatinib + trastuzumab + capecitabine (for patients with active brain metastases)
Tucatinib (a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting HER2) plus trastuzumab and capecitabine is a second-line option if patients have active brain metastases following progression with first-line trastuzumab-based therapy.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [143]Ramakrishna N, Anders CK, Lin NU, et al. Management of advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2636-55. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00520 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640075?tool=bestpractice.com
Tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine improves progression-free survival and overall survival compared with placebo plus trastuzumab and capecitabine in patients with previously treated HER2-positive MBC, including those with brain metastases.[144]Murthy RK, Loi S, Okines A, et al. Tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 13;382(7):597-609. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1914609 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31825569?tool=bestpractice.com [145]Lin NU, Murthy RK, Abramson V, et al. Tucatinib vs placebo, both in combination with trastuzumab and capecitabine, for previously treated ERBB2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer in patients with brain metastases: updated exploratory analysis of the HER2CLIMB randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2022 Dec 1;e225610. [Epub ahead of print]. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2799133 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36454580?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
tucatinib
and
trastuzumab
and
capecitabine
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
individualised treatment
The optimal sequence for third-line treatment and beyond is unclear; therefore, treatment decisions should be individualised (e.g., based on prior treatments, patient comorbidities, disease burden, treatment toxicity profile).[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com
The following treatments can be considered upon further progression (i.e., third-line and beyond) if not used previously: trastuzumab deruxtecan; tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine; trastuzumab emtansine; lapatinib plus capecitabine; margetuximab plus chemotherapy; neratinib plus capecitabine; trastuzumab plus chemotherapy (except anthracyclines); trastuzumab plus lapatinib; trastuzumab monotherapy; or other targeted agents (depending on biomarker status).[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com
Trastuzumab deruxtecan or tucatinib plus trastuzumab and capecitabine (if patients have active brain metastases) can be used as a third-line treatment if not used as a second-line treatment.
Trastuzumab emtansine may be considered after second-line treatment with trastuzumab deruxtecan, or if trastuzumab deruxtecan is unsuitable.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [140]Cortés J, Kim SB, Chung WP, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2022 Mar 24;386(12):1143-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35320644?tool=bestpractice.com [141]Hurvitz SA, Hegg R, Chung WP, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: updated results from DESTINY-Breast03, a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023 Jan 14;401(10371):105-17. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(22)02420-5/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36495879?tool=bestpractice.com
Lapatinib (a HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor) plus capecitabine is approved for use in patients with HER2-positive MBC who have received two or more prior HER2-targeted treatments in the metastatic setting.[146]Geyer CE, Forster J, Lindquist D, et al. Lapatinib plus capecitabine for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 28;355(26):2733-43. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa064320 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17192538?tool=bestpractice.com
Margetuximab (an anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody) plus chemotherapy is approved in the US for use in patients with HER2-positive MBC who have received two or more prior HER2-targeted treatments, at least one of which was in the metastatic setting.[147]Rugo HS, Im SA, Cardoso F, et al. Efficacy of margetuximab vs trastuzumab in patients with pretreated ERBB2-positive advanced breast cancer: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021 Apr 1;7(4):573-84. https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamaoncology/fullarticle/2775599 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33480963?tool=bestpractice.com Margetuximab is not approved in Europe.
Neratinib (an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor) plus capecitabine is approved in the US for use in patients with HER2-positive MBC who have received two or more prior HER2-targeted treatments in the metastatic setting.[148]Saura C, Oliveira M, Feng YH, et al. Neratinib plus capecitabine versus lapatinib plus capecitabine in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer previously treated with ≥ 2 HER2-directed regimens: phase III NALA trial. J Clin Oncol. 2020 Sep 20;38(27):3138-49. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.20.00147 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32678716?tool=bestpractice.com Neratinib is not approved for this indication in Europe.
Trastuzumab may be continued beyond progression, often in combination with different chemotherapy regimens (e.g., use of trastuzumab plus vinorelbine following progression with trastuzumab plus taxane).[149]von Minckwitz G, du Bois A, Schmidt M, et al. Trastuzumab beyond progression in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive advanced breast cancer: a German Breast Group 26/Breast International Group 03-05 study. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 20;27(12):1999-2006. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2008.19.6618?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19289619?tool=bestpractice.com [150]Gori S, Montemurro F, Spazzapan S, et al. Retreatment with trastuzumab-based therapy after disease progression following lapatinib in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2012 Jun;23(6):1436-41. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(19)38710-1/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22039084?tool=bestpractice.com Trastuzumab is effective with anthracyclines or taxanes, improving response rate and overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone.[151]Balduzzi S, Mantarro S, Guarneri V, et al. Trastuzumab-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 12;(6):CD006242. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD006242.pub2/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24919460?tool=bestpractice.com [152]Baselga J, Tripathy D, Mendelsohn J, et al. Phase II study of weekly intravenous recombinant humanized anti-p185HER2 monoclonal antibody in patients with HER2/neu-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1996 Mar;14(3):737-44. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8622019?tool=bestpractice.com However, the combination of anthracyclines with trastuzumab is not recommended as it leads to greater cardiac toxicity.
Trastuzumab plus lapatinib is a chemotherapy-free option that may be considered for patients unsuitable for chemotherapy.[153]Blackwell KL, Burstein HJ, Storniolo AM, et al. Randomized study of lapatinib alone or in combination with trastuzumab in women with ErbB2-positive, trastuzumab-refractory metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;28(7):1124-30. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2008.21.4437 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20124187?tool=bestpractice.com [154]Blackwell KL, Burstein HJ, Storniolo AM, et al. Overall survival benefit with lapatinib in combination with trastuzumab for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer: final results from the EGF104900 Study. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 20;30(21):2585-92. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.2011.35.6725 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22689807?tool=bestpractice.com
Other targeted agents may be considered for MBC patients with certain biomarkers (irrespective of hormone receptor-status and HER2-status) who have progressed following treatment and/or have no satisfactory alternative treatments.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [58]Henry NL, Somerfield MR, Dayao Z, et al. Biomarkers for systemic therapy in metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 20;40(27):3205-21. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01063 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35759724?tool=bestpractice.com
These agents include:[46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [121]Doebele RC, Drilon A, Paz-Ares L, et al. Entrectinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours: integrated analysis of three phase 1-2 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):271-82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461630 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31838007?tool=bestpractice.com [122]Demetri GD, De Braud F, Drilon A, et al. Updated integrated analysis of the efficacy and safety of entrectinib in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Apr 1;28(7):1302-12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365368 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144967?tool=bestpractice.com [123]Drilon A, Laetsch TW, Kummar S, et al. Efficacy of larotrectinib in TRK fusion-positive cancers in adults and children. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):731-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857389 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466156?tool=bestpractice.com [124]Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481136 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028255?tool=bestpractice.com [125]Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, et al. Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1353-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32919526?tool=bestpractice.com [126]André T, Berton D, Curigliano G, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with mismatch repair deficient solid tumors: a nonrandomized controlled trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2341165. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623195 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37917058?tool=bestpractice.com [127]Subbiah V, Wolf J, Konda B, et al. Tumour-agnostic efficacy and safety of selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumours other than lung or thyroid tumours (LIBRETTO-001): a phase 1/2, open-label, basket trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Oct;23(10):1261-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36108661?tool=bestpractice.com [128]Drilon A, Camidge DR, Lin JJ, et al. Repotrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):118-31. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2302299?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38197815?tool=bestpractice.com
entrectinib, larotrectinib, or repotrectinib (tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitors) for patients with NTRK fusion-positive tumours;
pembrolizumab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) tumours, or high tumour mutational burden (TMB-high [≥10 mutations/megabase]);
dostarlimab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with dMMR tumours;
selpercatinib (an RET kinase inhibitor) for patients with RET fusion-positive tumours.
See local specialist protocol for choice or regimen and dosing guidelines.
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
PD-L1-negative, triple-negative (hormone receptor-negative, HER2-negative), without visceral crisis
chemotherapy
First-line treatment for PD-L1-negative, triple-negative MBC patients without germline BRCA mutations is chemotherapy.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [96]Moy B, Rumble RB, Come SE, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer that is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 10;39(35):3938-58. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01374 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34324366?tool=bestpractice.com
Chemotherapy may be used at this stage, or at any stage of treatment if visceral crisis develops due to metastatic disease or worsening tumour burden.
Sequential single-agent chemotherapy is recommended. Combination chemotherapy may be considered in certain circumstances (e.g., life-threatening disease, visceral crisis, rapid clinical progression, or need for rapid symptom and/or disease control).[96]Moy B, Rumble RB, Come SE, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer that is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 10;39(35):3938-58. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01374 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34324366?tool=bestpractice.com
The choice of chemotherapy agent is mainly dictated by prior response, toxicity profile of the drugs (e.g., avoiding paclitaxel, with its known neurotoxicity, in patients with pre-existing neuropathy), patient tolerability, and the tumour burden. Most patients will have received multiple agents over time, and this must be considered in the selection of an agent.
Anthracyclines (e.g., doxorubicin, epirubicin) and taxanes (e.g., docetaxel, paclitaxel) have the greatest single-agent activity and are preferred agents, providing that the patient has not been treated with these agents previously.[165]Ghersi D, Willson ML, Chan MM, et al. Taxane-containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 10;(6):CD003366. https://www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD003366.pub3/full http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26058962?tool=bestpractice.com
Other formulations of these agents (e.g., pegylated liposomal doxorubicin and nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel [nab-paclitaxel]) are widely used as single-agent therapies for MBC due to their improved toxicity profile.[167]O'Brien ME, Wigler N, Inbar M, et al; CAELYX Breast Cancer Study Group. Reduced cardiotoxicity and comparable efficacy in a phase III trial of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin HCl (CAELYX/Doxil) versus conventional doxorubicin for first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2004 Mar;15(3):440-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14998846?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
doxorubicin
OR
epirubicin
OR
docetaxel
OR
paclitaxel
OR
doxorubicin liposomal
OR
paclitaxel nanoparticle albumin-bound
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
chemotherapy or sacituzumab govitecan
Patients with triple-negative MBC who progress following first-line treatment with chemotherapy can be considered for second-line treatment with a different chemotherapy regimen or sacituzumab govitecan (an antibody-drug conjugate combining a Trop-2-directed antibody with a topoisomerase inhibitor).[164]Bardia A, Hurvitz SA, Tolaney SM, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 22;384(16):1529-41. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2028485 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882206?tool=bestpractice.com
The following single-agent chemotherapy regimens may be used depending on patient factors and prior treatment (and as indicated): doxorubicin or epirubicin (anthracyclines); docetaxel or paclitaxel (taxanes); pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel; capecitabine or gemcitabine (antimetabolites); vinorelbine or eribulin (microtubule inhibitors); ixabepilone (an epothilone B analogue); cyclophosphamide (an alkylating agent).[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [96]Moy B, Rumble RB, Come SE, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer that is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 10;39(35):3938-58. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01374 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34324366?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
doxorubicin
OR
epirubicin
OR
docetaxel
OR
paclitaxel
OR
doxorubicin liposomal
OR
paclitaxel nanoparticle albumin-bound
OR
sacituzumab govitecan
Secondary options
capecitabine
OR
gemcitabine
OR
vinorelbine
OR
eribulin
OR
ixabepilone
OR
cyclophosphamide
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
chemotherapy or targeted therapies
Patients with triple-negative MBC who progress following second-line treatment can be considered for treatment with chemotherapy (i.e., a different regimen to those already used) or targeted agents (depending on biomarker status) for third-line treatment and beyond.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1
Targeted agents may be considered for MBC patients with certain biomarkers (irrespective of hormone receptor-status and HER2-status) who have progressed following treatment and/or have no satisfactory alternative treatments.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [58]Henry NL, Somerfield MR, Dayao Z, et al. Biomarkers for systemic therapy in metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 20;40(27):3205-21. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01063 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35759724?tool=bestpractice.com
These agents include:[46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [121]Doebele RC, Drilon A, Paz-Ares L, et al. Entrectinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours: integrated analysis of three phase 1-2 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):271-82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461630 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31838007?tool=bestpractice.com [122]Demetri GD, De Braud F, Drilon A, et al. Updated integrated analysis of the efficacy and safety of entrectinib in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Apr 1;28(7):1302-12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365368 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144967?tool=bestpractice.com [123]Drilon A, Laetsch TW, Kummar S, et al. Efficacy of larotrectinib in TRK fusion-positive cancers in adults and children. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):731-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857389 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466156?tool=bestpractice.com [124]Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481136 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028255?tool=bestpractice.com [125]Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, et al. Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1353-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32919526?tool=bestpractice.com [126]André T, Berton D, Curigliano G, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with mismatch repair deficient solid tumors: a nonrandomized controlled trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2341165. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623195 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37917058?tool=bestpractice.com [127]Subbiah V, Wolf J, Konda B, et al. Tumour-agnostic efficacy and safety of selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumours other than lung or thyroid tumours (LIBRETTO-001): a phase 1/2, open-label, basket trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Oct;23(10):1261-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36108661?tool=bestpractice.com [128]Drilon A, Camidge DR, Lin JJ, et al. Repotrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):118-31. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2302299?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38197815?tool=bestpractice.com
entrectinib, larotrectinib, or repotrectinib (tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitors) for patients with NTRK fusion-positive tumours;
pembrolizumab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) tumours, or high tumour mutational burden (TMB-high [≥10 mutations/megabase]);
dostarlimab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with dMMR tumours;
selpercatinib (an RET kinase inhibitor) for patients with RET fusion-positive tumours.
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
doxorubicin
OR
epirubicin
OR
docetaxel
OR
paclitaxel
OR
doxorubicin liposomal
OR
paclitaxel nanoparticle albumin-bound
OR
entrectinib
OR
larotrectinib
OR
repotrectinib
OR
pembrolizumab
OR
dostarlimab
OR
selpercatinib
Secondary options
capecitabine
OR
gemcitabine
OR
vinorelbine
OR
eribulin
OR
ixabepilone
OR
cyclophosphamide
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
PARP inhibitor or chemotherapy (platinum agent)
First-line treatment for PD-L1-negative, triple-negative MBC patients with germline BRCA mutations is a poly (adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor or chemotherapy (platinum agent).
The PARP inhibitors olaparib and talazoparib significantly improve progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy (capecitabine, vinorelbine, eribulin, or gemcitabine) in patients with HER2-negative MBC and germline BRCA mutations, particularly among patients with triple-negative disease.[116]Litton JK, Rugo HS, Ettl J, et al. Talazoparib in patients with advanced breast cancer and a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 15;379(8):753-63. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1802905?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30110579?tool=bestpractice.com [117]Robson M, Im SA, Senkus E, et al. Olaparib for metastatic breast cancer in patients with a germline BRCA mutation. N Engl J Med. 2017 Jun 4;377(6):523-33. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa1706450?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28578601?tool=bestpractice.com No significant improvement in overall survival has been demonstrated.[156]Litton JK, Hurvitz SA, Mina LA, et al. Talazoparib versus chemotherapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2-mutated HER2-negative advanced breast cancer: final overall survival results from the EMBRACA trial. Ann Oncol. 2020 Nov;31(11):1526-35. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)42106-4/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32828825?tool=bestpractice.com [157]Robson ME, Tung N, Conte P, et al. OlympiAD final overall survival and tolerability results: olaparib versus chemotherapy treatment of physician's choice in patients with a germline BRCA mutation and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2019 Apr 1;30(4):558-66. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(19)31111-1/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30689707?tool=bestpractice.com
The platinum agent carboplatin significantly improves response rate and progression-free survival compared with docetaxel in patients with triple-negative MBC and germline BRCA mutations.[158]Tutt A, Tovey H, Cheang MCU, et al. Carboplatin in BRCA1/2-mutated and triple-negative breast cancer BRCAness subgroups: the TNT Trial. Nat Med. 2018 May;24(5):628-37. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6372067 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29713086?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
olaparib
OR
talazoparib
OR
carboplatin
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
chemotherapy or sacituzumab govitecan
Patients with triple-negative MBC who progress following first-line treatment can be considered for second-line treatment with chemotherapy or sacituzumab govitecan (an antibody-drug conjugate combining a Trop-2-directed antibody with a topoisomerase inhibitor).[164]Bardia A, Hurvitz SA, Tolaney SM, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 22;384(16):1529-41. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2028485 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882206?tool=bestpractice.com
If chemotherapy was used for first-line treatment, then a different chemotherapy regimen can be considered for second-line treatment and beyond.
The following single-agent chemotherapy regimens may be used depending on patient factors and prior treatment (and as indicated): doxorubicin or epirubicin (anthracyclines); docetaxel or paclitaxel (taxanes); pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel; capecitabine or gemcitabine (antimetabolites); vinorelbine or eribulin (microtubule inhibitors); ixabepilone (an epothilone B analogue); cyclophosphamide (an alkylating agent).[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [96]Moy B, Rumble RB, Come SE, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer that is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 10;39(35):3938-58. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01374 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34324366?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
doxorubicin
OR
epirubicin
OR
docetaxel
OR
paclitaxel
OR
doxorubicin liposomal
OR
paclitaxel nanoparticle albumin-bound
OR
sacituzumab govitecan
Secondary options
capecitabine
OR
gemcitabine
OR
vinorelbine
OR
eribulin
OR
ixabepilone
OR
cyclophosphamide
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
chemotherapy or targeted therapies
Patients with triple-negative MBC who progress following second-line treatment can be considered for treatment with chemotherapy (i.e., a different regimen to those already used) or targeted agents (depending on biomarker status) for third-line treatment and beyond.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1
Targeted agents may be considered for MBC patients with certain biomarkers (irrespective of hormone receptor-status and HER2-status) who have progressed following treatment and/or have no satisfactory alternative treatments.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [58]Henry NL, Somerfield MR, Dayao Z, et al. Biomarkers for systemic therapy in metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 20;40(27):3205-21. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01063 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35759724?tool=bestpractice.com
These agents include:[46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [121]Doebele RC, Drilon A, Paz-Ares L, et al. Entrectinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours: integrated analysis of three phase 1-2 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):271-82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461630 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31838007?tool=bestpractice.com [122]Demetri GD, De Braud F, Drilon A, et al. Updated integrated analysis of the efficacy and safety of entrectinib in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Apr 1;28(7):1302-12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365368 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144967?tool=bestpractice.com [123]Drilon A, Laetsch TW, Kummar S, et al. Efficacy of larotrectinib in TRK fusion-positive cancers in adults and children. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):731-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857389 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466156?tool=bestpractice.com [124]Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481136 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028255?tool=bestpractice.com [125]Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, et al. Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1353-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32919526?tool=bestpractice.com [126]André T, Berton D, Curigliano G, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with mismatch repair deficient solid tumors: a nonrandomized controlled trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2341165. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623195 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37917058?tool=bestpractice.com [127]Subbiah V, Wolf J, Konda B, et al. Tumour-agnostic efficacy and safety of selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumours other than lung or thyroid tumours (LIBRETTO-001): a phase 1/2, open-label, basket trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Oct;23(10):1261-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36108661?tool=bestpractice.com [128]Drilon A, Camidge DR, Lin JJ, et al. Repotrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):118-31. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2302299?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38197815?tool=bestpractice.com
entrectinib, larotrectinib, or repotrectinib (tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitors) for patients with NTRK fusion-positive tumours;
pembrolizumab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) tumours, or high tumour mutational burden (TMB-high [≥10 mutations/megabase])
dostarlimab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with dMMR tumours;
selpercatinib (an RET kinase inhibitor) for patients with RET fusion-positive tumours.
See local specialist protocol for choice of regimen and dosing guidelines.
Primary options
doxorubicin
OR
epirubicin
OR
docetaxel
OR
paclitaxel
OR
doxorubicin liposomal
OR
paclitaxel nanoparticle albumin-bound
OR
entrectinib
OR
larotrectinib
OR
repotrectinib
OR
pembrolizumab
OR
dostarlimab
OR
selpercatinib
Secondary options
capecitabine
OR
gemcitabine
OR
vinorelbine
OR
eribulin
OR
ixabepilone
OR
cyclophosphamide
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
PD-L1-positive, triple-negative (hormone receptor-negative, HER2-negative), without visceral crisis
pembrolizumab + chemotherapy
Atezolizumab plus nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel [nab-paclitaxel] is approved in the EU and other countries (except the US; accelerated approval was withdrawn for this indication in 2021) for first-line treatment in adults with unresectable, locally advanced or metastatic, PD-L1-positive, triple-negative MBC whose tumours have PD-L1 expression ≥1% and who have not received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease.
In one phase 3 study of patients with untreated triple-negative MBC, atezolizumab plus nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel significantly improved progression-free survival compared with placebo plus nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel in PD-L1-positive patients.[159]Schmid P, Adams S, Rugo HS, et al. Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 29;379(22):2108-21. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1809615?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30345906?tool=bestpractice.com
Atezolizumab in combination with paclitaxel (the non-protein-bound formulation) is not approved for use in breast cancer.[160]ClinicalTrials.gov (US). A study of atezolizumab and paclitaxel versus placebo and paclitaxel in participants with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (IMpassion131). Feb 2022 [internet publication]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03125902 [161]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA issues alert about efficacy and potential safety concerns with atezolizumab in combination with paclitaxel for treatment of breast cancer. 8 Sep 2020 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-issues-alert-about-efficacy-and-potential-safety-concerns-atezolizumab-combination-paclitaxel [162]European Medicines Agency. EMA reminds physicians to use Tecentriq with nab-paclitaxel for treating breast cancer. Oct 2020 [internet publication]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-reminds-physicians-use-tecentriq-nab-paclitaxel-treating-breast-cancer In one phase 3 study, atezolizumab plus paclitaxel did not improve progression-free survival compared with placebo plus paclitaxel in PD-L1-positive patients.[160]ClinicalTrials.gov (US). A study of atezolizumab and paclitaxel versus placebo and paclitaxel in participants with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) (IMpassion131). Feb 2022 [internet publication]. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03125902 Nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel should not be replaced with paclitaxel.[161]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA issues alert about efficacy and potential safety concerns with atezolizumab in combination with paclitaxel for treatment of breast cancer. 8 Sep 2020 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-issues-alert-about-efficacy-and-potential-safety-concerns-atezolizumab-combination-paclitaxel [162]European Medicines Agency. EMA reminds physicians to use Tecentriq with nab-paclitaxel for treating breast cancer. Oct 2020 [internet publication]. https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/news/ema-reminds-physicians-use-tecentriq-nab-paclitaxel-treating-breast-cancer
Pembrolizumab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) plus chemotherapy is approved as a first-line treatment for patients with locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who are PD-L1-positive (combined positive score [CPS] ≥10), as determined by a companion diagnostic test.
Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel [nab-paclitaxel], paclitaxel, or gemcitabine plus carboplatin) improves progression-free survival compared with placebo plus chemotherapy.[163]Cortes J, Cescon DW, Rugo HS, et al. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy for previously untreated locally recurrent inoperable or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (KEYNOTE-355): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind, phase 3 clinical trial. Lancet. 2020 Dec 5;396(10265):1817-28. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33278935?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
atezolizumab
and
paclitaxel nanoparticle albumin-bound
OR
pembrolizumab
-- AND --
paclitaxel nanoparticle albumin-bound
or
paclitaxel
OR
pembrolizumab
and
carboplatin
and
gemcitabine
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
chemotherapy or sacituzumab govitecan
Patients with triple-negative MBC who progress following first-line treatment can be considered for second-line treatment with chemotherapy or sacituzumab govitecan (an antibody-drug conjugate combining a Trop-2-directed antibody with a topoisomerase inhibitor).[164]Bardia A, Hurvitz SA, Tolaney SM, et al. Sacituzumab govitecan in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2021 Apr 22;384(16):1529-41. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2028485 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33882206?tool=bestpractice.com
The following single-agent chemotherapy regimens may be used depending on patient factors and prior treatment (and as indicated): doxorubicin or epirubicin (anthracyclines); docetaxel or paclitaxel (taxanes); pegylated liposomal doxorubicin; nanoparticle albumin-bound-paclitaxel; capecitabine or gemcitabine (antimetabolites); vinorelbine or eribulin (microtubule inhibitors); ixabepilone (an epothilone B analogue); cyclophosphamide (an alkylating agent).[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [96]Moy B, Rumble RB, Come SE, et al. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer that is either endocrine-pretreated or hormone receptor-negative: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Dec 10;39(35):3938-58. https://www.doi.org/10.1200/JCO.21.01374 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34324366?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
doxorubicin
OR
epirubicin
OR
docetaxel
OR
paclitaxel
OR
doxorubicin liposomal
OR
paclitaxel nanoparticle albumin-bound
OR
sacituzumab govitecan
Secondary options
capecitabine
OR
gemcitabine
OR
vinorelbine
OR
eribulin
OR
ixabepilone
OR
cyclophosphamide
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
chemotherapy or targeted therapies
Patients with triple-negative MBC who progress following second-line treatment can be considered for treatment with chemotherapy (i.e., a different regimen to those already used) or targeted agents (depending on biomarker status) for third-line treatment and beyond.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1
Targeted agents may be considered for MBC patients with certain biomarkers (irrespective of hormone receptor-status and HER2-status) who have progressed following treatment and/or have no satisfactory alternative treatments.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [58]Henry NL, Somerfield MR, Dayao Z, et al. Biomarkers for systemic therapy in metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 20;40(27):3205-21. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01063 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35759724?tool=bestpractice.com
These agents include:[46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [121]Doebele RC, Drilon A, Paz-Ares L, et al. Entrectinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours: integrated analysis of three phase 1-2 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):271-82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461630 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31838007?tool=bestpractice.com [122]Demetri GD, De Braud F, Drilon A, et al. Updated integrated analysis of the efficacy and safety of entrectinib in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Apr 1;28(7):1302-12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365368 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144967?tool=bestpractice.com [123]Drilon A, Laetsch TW, Kummar S, et al. Efficacy of larotrectinib in TRK fusion-positive cancers in adults and children. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):731-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857389 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466156?tool=bestpractice.com [124]Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481136 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028255?tool=bestpractice.com [125]Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, et al. Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1353-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32919526?tool=bestpractice.com [126]André T, Berton D, Curigliano G, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with mismatch repair deficient solid tumors: a nonrandomized controlled trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2341165. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623195 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37917058?tool=bestpractice.com [127]Subbiah V, Wolf J, Konda B, et al. Tumour-agnostic efficacy and safety of selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumours other than lung or thyroid tumours (LIBRETTO-001): a phase 1/2, open-label, basket trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Oct;23(10):1261-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36108661?tool=bestpractice.com [128]Drilon A, Camidge DR, Lin JJ, et al. Repotrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):118-31. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2302299?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38197815?tool=bestpractice.com
entrectinib, larotrectinib, or repotrectinib (tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitors) for patients with NTRK fusion-positive tumours;
pembrolizumab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) tumours, or high tumour mutational burden (TMB-high [≥10 mutations/megabase]);
dostarlimab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with dMMR tumours;
selpercatinib (an RET kinase inhibitor) for patients with RET fusion-positive tumours.
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
doxorubicin
OR
epirubicin
OR
docetaxel
OR
paclitaxel
OR
doxorubicin liposomal
OR
paclitaxel nanoparticle albumin-bound
OR
entrectinib
OR
larotrectinib
OR
repotrectinib
OR
pembrolizumab
OR
dostarlimab
OR
selpercatinib
Secondary options
capecitabine
OR
gemcitabine
OR
vinorelbine
OR
eribulin
OR
ixabepilone
OR
cyclophosphamide
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
hormone receptor-positive or negative, HER2-negative, with visceral crisis
chemotherapy
Chemotherapy is the mainstay of therapy in end-organ/visceral crisis, where the goal of therapy is to attain rapid disease control and palliation of symptoms.
Combination chemotherapy, if tolerated, is preferred as it offers better response rates in such scenarios.
See local specialist protocol for choice of regimen and dosing guidelines.
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
targeted therapies
Other targeted agents may be considered for MBC patients with certain biomarkers (irrespective of hormone receptor-status and HER2-status) who have progressed following treatment and/or have no satisfactory alternative treatments.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [58]Henry NL, Somerfield MR, Dayao Z, et al. Biomarkers for systemic therapy in metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 20;40(27):3205-21. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01063 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35759724?tool=bestpractice.com
These agents include:[46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [121]Doebele RC, Drilon A, Paz-Ares L, et al. Entrectinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours: integrated analysis of three phase 1-2 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):271-82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461630 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31838007?tool=bestpractice.com [122]Demetri GD, De Braud F, Drilon A, et al. Updated integrated analysis of the efficacy and safety of entrectinib in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Apr 1;28(7):1302-12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365368 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144967?tool=bestpractice.com [123]Drilon A, Laetsch TW, Kummar S, et al. Efficacy of larotrectinib in TRK fusion-positive cancers in adults and children. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):731-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857389 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466156?tool=bestpractice.com [124]Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481136 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028255?tool=bestpractice.com [125]Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, et al. Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1353-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32919526?tool=bestpractice.com [126]André T, Berton D, Curigliano G, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with mismatch repair deficient solid tumors: a nonrandomized controlled trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2341165. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623195 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37917058?tool=bestpractice.com [127]Subbiah V, Wolf J, Konda B, et al. Tumour-agnostic efficacy and safety of selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumours other than lung or thyroid tumours (LIBRETTO-001): a phase 1/2, open-label, basket trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Oct;23(10):1261-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36108661?tool=bestpractice.com [128]Drilon A, Camidge DR, Lin JJ, et al. Repotrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):118-31. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2302299?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38197815?tool=bestpractice.com
entrectinib, larotrectinib, or repotrectinib (tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitors) for patients with NTRK fusion-positive tumours;
pembrolizumab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) tumours, or high tumour mutational burden (TMB-high [≥10 mutations/megabase]);
dostarlimab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with dMMR tumours;
selpercatinib (an RET kinase inhibitor) for patients with RET fusion-positive tumours.
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
entrectinib
OR
larotrectinib
OR
repotrectinib
OR
pembrolizumab
OR
dostarlimab
OR
selpercatinib
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
hormone receptor-positive or negative, HER2-positive, with visceral crisis
pertuzumab + trastuzumab + a taxane
Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel significantly improves progression-free survival and overall survival, compared with placebo plus trastuzumab and docetaxel when used as first-line treatment for HER2-positive MBC.[134]Baselga J, Cortés J, Kim SB, et al; CLEOPATRA Study Group. Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab plus docetaxel for metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 12;366(2):109-19. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1113216 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22149875?tool=bestpractice.com [135]Swain SM, Baselga J, Kim SB, et al; CLEOPATRA Study Group. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015 Feb 19;372(8):724-34. http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1413513#t=article http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25693012?tool=bestpractice.com [136]Swain SM, Miles D, Kim SB, et al. Pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (CLEOPATRA): end-of-study results from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Apr;21(4):519-30. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32171426?tool=bestpractice.com
Pertuzumab plus trastuzumab and docetaxel can be prescribed regardless of hormone receptor status.[133]Giordano SH, Franzoi MAB, Temin S, et al. Systemic therapy for advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Aug 10;40(23):2612-35. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.00519 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35640077?tool=bestpractice.com
Use of pertuzumab is associated with a significant incidence of rash and diarrhoea.[137]Drucker AM, Wu S, Dang CT, et al. Risk of rash with the anti-HER2 dimerization antibody pertuzumab: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012 Sep;135(2):347-54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22782294?tool=bestpractice.com
A fixed-dose formulation of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection is available, which may offer more convenient dosing for patients.[138]Tan AR, Im SA, Mattar A, et al. Fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection plus chemotherapy in HER2-positive early breast cancer (FeDeriCa): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jan;22(1):85-97. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357420?tool=bestpractice.com
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
pertuzumab
-- AND --
trastuzumab
-- AND --
docetaxel
or
paclitaxel
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
targeted therapies
Other targeted agents may be considered for MBC patients with certain biomarkers (irrespective of hormone receptor-status and HER2-status) who have progressed following treatment and/or have no satisfactory alternative treatments.[28]Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2021 Dec;32(12):1475-95. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(21)04498-7/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34678411?tool=bestpractice.com [46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [58]Henry NL, Somerfield MR, Dayao Z, et al. Biomarkers for systemic therapy in metastatic breast cancer: ASCO guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2022 Sep 20;40(27):3205-21. https://ascopubs.org/doi/10.1200/JCO.22.01063 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35759724?tool=bestpractice.com
These agents include:[46]National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer [internet publication]. https://www.nccn.org/guidelines/category_1 [121]Doebele RC, Drilon A, Paz-Ares L, et al. Entrectinib in patients with advanced or metastatic NTRK fusion-positive solid tumours: integrated analysis of three phase 1-2 trials. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Feb;21(2):271-82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7461630 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31838007?tool=bestpractice.com [122]Demetri GD, De Braud F, Drilon A, et al. Updated integrated analysis of the efficacy and safety of entrectinib in patients with NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Apr 1;28(7):1302-12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9365368 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35144967?tool=bestpractice.com [123]Drilon A, Laetsch TW, Kummar S, et al. Efficacy of larotrectinib in TRK fusion-positive cancers in adults and children. N Engl J Med. 2018 Feb 22;378(8):731-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5857389 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29466156?tool=bestpractice.com [124]Le DT, Uram JN, Wang H, et al. PD-1 blockade in tumors with mismatch-repair deficiency. N Engl J Med. 2015 Jun 25;372(26):2509-20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4481136 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26028255?tool=bestpractice.com [125]Marabelle A, Fakih M, Lopez J, et al. Association of tumour mutational burden with outcomes in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with pembrolizumab: prospective biomarker analysis of the multicohort, open-label, phase 2 KEYNOTE-158 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Oct;21(10):1353-65. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32919526?tool=bestpractice.com [126]André T, Berton D, Curigliano G, et al. Antitumor activity and safety of dostarlimab monotherapy in patients with mismatch repair deficient solid tumors: a nonrandomized controlled trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Nov 1;6(11):e2341165. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10623195 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37917058?tool=bestpractice.com [127]Subbiah V, Wolf J, Konda B, et al. Tumour-agnostic efficacy and safety of selpercatinib in patients with RET fusion-positive solid tumours other than lung or thyroid tumours (LIBRETTO-001): a phase 1/2, open-label, basket trial. Lancet Oncol. 2022 Oct;23(10):1261-73. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36108661?tool=bestpractice.com [128]Drilon A, Camidge DR, Lin JJ, et al. Repotrectinib in ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2024 Jan 11;390(2):118-31. https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2302299?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%20%200pubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38197815?tool=bestpractice.com
entrectinib, larotrectinib, or repotrectinib (tyrosine receptor kinase inhibitors) for patients with NTRK fusion-positive tumours
pembrolizumab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) tumours, or high tumour mutational burden (TMB-high [≥10 mutations/megabase]);
dostarlimab (an immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting PD-1) for patients with dMMR tumours;
selpercatinib (an RET kinase inhibitor) for patients with RET fusion-positive tumours.
See local specialist protocol for dosing guidelines.
Primary options
entrectinib
OR
larotrectinib
OR
repotrectinib
OR
pembrolizumab
OR
dostarlimab
OR
selpercatinib
supportive care
Treatment recommended for ALL patients in selected patient group
Supportive care includes: therapy for bone metastases and bone destruction (e.g., bisphosphonate or denosumab; palliative radiotherapy); and multi-disciplinary team support with symptom management.[170]Van Poznak C, Somerfield MR, Barlow WE, et al. Role of bone-modifying agents in metastatic breast cancer: an American Society of Clinical Oncology-Cancer Care Ontario focused guideline update. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec 10;35(35):3978-86. https://ascopubs.org/doi/full/10.1200/JCO.2017.75.4614?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori:rid:crossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3dpubmed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29035643?tool=bestpractice.com [171]Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017 Jan - Feb;7(1):4-12. https://www.practicalradonc.org/article/S1879-8500(16)30122-9/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27663933?tool=bestpractice.com [172]Coleman R, Hadji P, Body JJ, et al. Bone health in cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-63. https://www.annalsofoncology.org/article/S0923-7534(20)39995-6/fulltext http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32801018?tool=bestpractice.com
The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is investigating the risk of severe hypocalcaemia in patients on dialysis receiving denosumab (Prolia® 60 mg/mL approved for treatment to increase bone mass in women at high risk for fracture receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy for breast cancer).[173]US Food and Drug Administration. FDA investigating risk of severe hypocalcemia in patients on dialysis receiving osteoporosis medicine Prolia (denosumab). Nov 2022 [internet publication]. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-investigating-risk-severe-hypocalcemia-patients-dialysis-receiving-osteoporosis-medicine-prolia Interim results from two safety studies of denosumab suggest an increased risk of hypocalcaemia in patients with advanced kidney disease, with serious outcomes (hospitalisation and death) in dialysis patients. While the investigation continues, health care professionals should: consider the risk of hypocalcaemia with denosumab in dialysis patients; provide adequate calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and frequent blood calcium monitoring; and report adverse effects. The FDA has not issued a warning with respect to the brand of denosumab approved specifically for the prevention of skeletal-related adverse events in malignancy (Xgeva® 120 mg/1.7 mL).
Palliative breast surgery is considered primarily in patients whose life expectancy is measured in months or years (not days or weeks) and if it is likely to improve symptoms and quality of life. It is usually performed in patients with limited disease, in whom surgery will render the patient clinically disease-free, or in individuals in whom local disease is difficult to manage by the patient and physician.[174]Ruiterkamp J, Voogd AC, Bosscha K, et al. Impact of breast surgery on survival in patients with distant metastases at initial presentation: a systematic review of the literature. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Feb;120(1):9-16. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20012891?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in patients with de novo MBC has been shown to improve locoregional progression, but not overall survival or quality of life.[175]Khan SA, Zhao F, Goldstein LJ, et al. Early local therapy for the primary site in de novo stage IV breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial (EA2108). J Clin Oncol. 2022 Mar 20;40(9):978-87. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8937009 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34995128?tool=bestpractice.com Breast surgery in MBC should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Enrolment into clinical trials should be strongly considered at any stage during management.
Choose a patient group to see our recommendations
Please note that formulations/routes and doses may differ between drug names and brands, drug formularies, or locations. Treatment recommendations are specific to patient groups. See disclaimer
Use of this content is subject to our disclaimer