Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in people with diabetes.[11]Leon BM, Maddox TM. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatment recommendations and future research. World J Diabetes. 2015 Oct 10;6(13):1246-58.
https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-9358/full/v6/i13/1246.htm
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26468341?tool=bestpractice.com
People with diabetes have a 1.5- to 2-fold increased risk of myocardial infarction (MI) compared with people without diabetes. Coronary artery disease in people with diabetes is more severe, starts at an earlier age, and is more costly. Patients with type 1 diabetes are at higher risk of death after MI than patients without diabetes.[401]Kerola AM, Juonala M, Palomäki A, et al. Case fatality of patients with type 1 diabetes after myocardial infarction. Diabetes Care. 2022 Jul 7;45(7):1657-65.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9274223
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35679070?tool=bestpractice.com
Diabetes is an independent predictor of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality in people with heart failure.[402]Dunlay SM, Givertz MM, Aguilar D, et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus and heart failure: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the Heart Failure Society of America. Circulation. 2019 Aug 13;140(7):e294-324.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000691
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31167558?tool=bestpractice.com
[403]MacDonald MR, Petrie MC, Varvani F, et al. Impact of diabetes on outcomes in patients with low and preserved ejection fraction heart failure: an analysis of the Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity (CHARM) programme. Eur Heart J. 2008 Jun;29(11):1377-85.
https://academic.oup.com/eurheartj/article/29/11/1377/636933
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18413309?tool=bestpractice.com
The relative risk of CV-related death or heart failure-related hospitalisation is greater in people with preserved ejection fraction (diastolic heart failure) than with low ejection fraction.
Multiple studies comparing coronary artery bypass graft versus percutaneous intervention with drug-eluting stents have shown that diabetes is an independent predictor of target lesion re-stenosis.[313]Scheen AJ. Drug interactions of clinical importance with antihyperglycaemic agents: an update. Drug Saf. 2005;28(7):601-31.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15963007?tool=bestpractice.com
[353]Flaherty JD, Davidson CJ. Diabetes and coronary revascularization. JAMA. 2005 Mar 23;293(12):1501-8.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/200563
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15784875?tool=bestpractice.com
Drug-eluting stents appear to be superior to bare-metal stents in people with diabetes, with regard to major adverse cardiac events such as death, MI, or need for repeat revascularisation.[356]Maresta A, Varani E, Balducci M, et al. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus (from the Italian Multicenter Randomized DESSERT Study). Am J Cardiol. 2008 Jun 1;101(11):1560-6.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18489933?tool=bestpractice.com
[357]Mahmud E, Bromberg-Marin G, Palakodeti V, et al. Clinical efficacy of drug-eluting stents in diabetic patients: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Jun 24;51(25):2385-95.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18565394?tool=bestpractice.com
[358]Garg P, Normand SL, Silbaugh TS, et al. Drug-eluting or bare-metal stenting in patients with diabetes mellitus: results from the Massachusetts Data Analysis Center Registry. Circulation. 2008 Nov 25;118(22):2277-85.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19001019?tool=bestpractice.com
[359]Frye RL, August P, Brooks MM, et al; BARI 2D Study Group. A randomized trial of therapies for type 2 diabetes and coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2009 Jun 11;360(24):2503-15.
https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0805796
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19502645?tool=bestpractice.com
[360]De Luca G, Dirksen MT, Spaulding C, et al; DESERT Cooperation. Meta-analysis comparing efficacy and safety of first generation drug-eluting stents to bare-metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol. 2013 May 1;111(9):1295-304.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23490029?tool=bestpractice.com
While the benefits of optimising CVD risk factors are clear in patients with diabetes, in practice many patients are not achieving recommended targets.[404]Varkevisser RDM, Birnie E, Vollenbrock CE, et al. Cardiovascular risk management in people with type 1 diabetes: performance using three guidelines. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022 Jul;10(4):e002765.
https://drc.bmj.com/content/10/4/e002765
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35858715?tool=bestpractice.com
[405]Martín Enguix D, Hidalgo Rodríguez A, Sánchez Cambronero M, et al. Application of the individualized objectives defined by the European 2019 lipid guidelines in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Investig Arterioscler. 2022 Jan-Feb;34(1):19-26.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34876304?tool=bestpractice.com
[406]Bullock JE. Provider adherence to American Diabetes Association cardiovascular risk-reduction guidelines: an integrative review. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. 2024 Jan 1;36(1):17-22.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37494065?tool=bestpractice.com
Data from the US Diabetes Collaborative Registry of 74,393 adults with diabetes demonstrate a prevalence of 74% with HbA1c <7%, 40% with blood pressure <130/80 mmHg, and 49% with low density lipoprotein-cholesterol <100 mg/dL (<70 mg/dL if with atherosclerotic CVD), but only 15% at target for all 3 factors.[407]Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2023 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2023 Feb 21;147(8):e93-621.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001123
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36695182?tool=bestpractice.com
Newer evidence-based therapies for diabetes proven to reduce CVD risk, including sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists, remain highly underused.[4]Martin SS, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, et al. 2024 Heart disease and stroke statistics: a report of US and global data from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2024 Feb 20;149(8):e347-913.
https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001209
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38264914?tool=bestpractice.com