Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Transitions: Journal of Transient Migration
  4. Volume 8, Issue 1
  5. Article
1-2: The End of Migration
  • ISSN: 2397-7140
  • E-ISSN: 2397-7159

Abstract

This article addresses how transient international refugees create new digital reconstructions of home-making when physically and mentally shuttling between two or more places of residence. Worldwide crises force millions of international refugees to adapt to new ways of constant remigration between their temporary places of residence and their home country. Instead of settling in a new place of residence, many international refugees often have difficulties feeling at home where they do not want to be. This article focuses on current refugees from Ukraine in Europe who shuttle between their homeland and their host country. The actual process of the refugees’ constant balancing between physically and mentally leaving and arriving at their home and host countries is coined ‘shuttle refuge’ in this article. It emphasizes the loss of a permanent home during refuge and portrays the necessity of digital reconstructions of home-making with friends and family via communication media due to the unavailability of a constant physical home. After addressing the legal circumstances that currently contribute to the ongoing state of temporariness, this article illustrates practices and effects of the shuttle refugee through a group interview with six recent Ukrainian refugees in Germany at the beginning of the year 2023 to shed light on the interviewees’ adaption to a new cultural environment and their efforts in digital home-making practices with their families and friends.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The Faculty of Arts and Humanities at Paderborn University
© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/tjtm_00065_1
2024-08-20
2025-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Abdelmonem, M. G. (2021), ‘Contested homes in the age of the cloud: The changing socio-spatial dynamics of family living and care for older people in the 21st century’, in A. Argandoña, J. Malala and R. C. Peatfield (eds), The Home in the Digital Age, London: Routledge, pp. 56–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ahmed, S. (1999), ‘Home and away: Narratives of migration and estrangement’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 2:3, pp. 329–47, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1177/136787799900200303.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Albrecht, C. and Panchenko, T. (2022), ‘Fluchtbewegungen aus der Ukraine: Ursachen, Auswirkungen und Prognosen’, ifo Schnelldienst, 75, Sonderausgabe April, pp. 29–36, https://www.ifo.de/DocDL/sd-2022-sonderausgabe-april-albrecht-panchenko-fluchtbewegung-ukraine.pdf. Accessed 13 January 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Alencar, A. (2020), ‘Mobile communication and refugees: An analytical review of academic literature’, Sociology Compass, 14:8, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1111/soc4.12802.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Alinejad, D. (2019), ‘Careful co-presence: The transnational mediation of emotional intimacy’, Social Media + Society, 5:2, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1177/2056305119854222.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Almenara-Niebla, S. (2020), ‘Making digital “home-camps”: Mediating emotions among the Sahrawi refugee diaspora’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 23:5, pp. 728–44, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1177/1367877920921876.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Baas, M. (2016), ‘Becoming trans/nationally mobile: The conflation of internal and international migration in the trajectories of Indian student-migrants in Australia and beyond’, Journal of South Asian Studies, 39:1, pp. 14–28, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/00856401.2016.1109166.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. BBC News (2022), ‘How many Ukrainian refugees are there and where have they gone?’, BBC, 4 July, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-60555472. Accessed 13 January 2024.
  9. Blokland, T., Krüger, D., Vief, R. and Schultze, H. (2021), ‘Where we turn to: Rethinking networks, urban space, and research methods’, in A. Million, C. Haid, I. Castillo Ulloa and N. Baur (eds), Spatial Transformations: Kaleidoscopic Perspectives on the Refiguration of Spaces, London: Routledge, pp. 258–68.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bowley, G. (2023), ‘Ukrainians in Germany weigh wrenching choice: Stay or go home’, New York Times, 3 December, https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/03/world/europe/germany-ukraine-refugees.html. Accessed 13 January 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Cabalquinto, E. C. (2018), ‘Ambivalent intimacies: Entangled pains and gains through Facebook use in transnational family life’, in A. S. Dobson, B. Robards and N. Carah (eds), Digital Intimate Publics and Social Media, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 247–63, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1007/978-3-319-97607-5_15.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chang, S. and Gomes, C. (eds) (2021), Digital Experiences of International Students Challenging Assumptions and Rethinking Engagement, Milton: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Christ, S. and Etzold, B. (2022), ‘Family figurations in displacement: Entangled mobilities of refugees towards Germany and beyond’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 48:18, pp. 4419–35, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/1369183X.2022.2090160.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Coninck, D. De (2022), ‘The refugee paradox during wartime in Europe: How Ukrainian and Afghan refugees are (not) alike’, International Migration Review, 57:2, pp. 578–86, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1177/01979183221116874.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Council of the EU (2022), ‘Ukraine: Council unanimously introduces temporary protection for persons fleeing the war’, press release, 4 March, https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2022/03/04/ukraine-council-introduces-temporary-protection-for-persons-fleeing-the-war/. Accessed 4 March 2024.
  16. Crowley-Henry, M., Coogan, K., Redmond, C. and Sheil, N. (2022), ‘Tales from the Irish diaspora during COVID-19: Prompting a future research agenda for global mobility’, The Irish Journal of Management, 40:2, pp. 157–72, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.2478/ijm-2021-0012.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Da Costa, K. and Dimitrova, G. (2023), ‘The Ukrainian refugees returning to war-torn homeland’, BBC, 14 August, https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-berkshire-66465918. Accessed 13 January 2024.
  18. Dalal, A. (2022), From Shelters to Dwellings: The Zaatari Refugee Camp, Bielefeld: Transcript.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Dalal, A., Darweesh, A., Misselwitz, P. and Steigemann, A. (2018), ‘Planning the ideal refugee camp? A critical interrogation of recent planning innovations in Jordan and Germany’, Urban Planning, 3:4, pp. 64–78, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.17645/up.v3i4.1726.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Dekker, R., Engbersen, G. and Faber, M. (2016), ‘The use of online media in migration networks’, Population, Space and Place, 22:6, pp. 539–51, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1002/psp.1938.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Düvell, F. (2021), ‘Quo vadis, migration studies? The quest for a migratory epistemology’, Zeitschrift für Migrationsforschung, 1:1, pp. 215–41, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.48439/zmf.v1i1.106.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Düvell, F. and Lapshyna, I. (2022a), ‘On war in Ukraine, double standards and the epistemological ignoring of the global east’, International Migration, 60:4, pp. 209–12, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1111/imig.13038.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Düvell, F. and Lapshyna, I. (2022b), ‘The Russian invasion of Ukraine: Scope, patterns and future development of displacement: Short analysis’, working paper, Osnabrück: Institut für Migrationsforschung und Interkulturelle Studien (IMIS) der Universität Osnabrück.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Easthope, H. (2004), ‘A place called home’, Housing, Theory and Society, 21:3, pp. 128–38, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/14036090410021360.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Elinder, M., Erixson, O. and Hammar, O. (2022), ‘Where would Ukrainian refugees go if they could go anywhere?’, International Migration Review, 57:2, pp. 587–602, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1177/01979183221131559.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. European Commission (n.d.a), ‘Migration and home affairs: Migration management: Welcoming refugees from Ukraine’, https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/migration-and-asylum/migration-management/migration-management-welcoming-refugees-ukraine_en. Accessed 13 January 2024.
  27. European Commission, ‘Migration and home affairs: Temporary protection’, n.d., https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/policies/migration-and-asylum/common-european-asylum-system/temporary-protection_en. Accessed 13 January 2024.
  28. European Parliament (2017), ‘The EU response to migration and asylum’, 30 June, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20170629STO78629/the-eu-response-to-migration-and-asylum. Accessed 27 February 2024.
  29. Federal Office for Migration and Refugees Germany (2024), ‘Travelling to Ukraine’, https://www.germany4ukraine.de/hilfeportal-en/entry-residence-and-return/travelling-to-ukraine. Accessed 13 January 2024.
  30. Flüchtlingsrat Berlin e.V. (2022), ‘Info for war refugees from Ukraine: Registration, residence permit, social aid, med. care, third country nationals etc.’, 8 December, https://fluechtlingsrat-berlin.de/news_termine/ukraine_english/. Accessed 20 March 2024.
  31. Friedrichs-Liesenkötter, H., Kamin, A. M., Meister, D. M., Ponomarenko, L. and Teichert, J. (2023), ‘Leben in Ungewissheiten: Medien(-handeln) mit Blick auf Alltag, Erziehung und schulische Bildung aus der Perspektive geflüchteter Frauen aus der Ukraine’, merz | medien + erziehung, 67:1, pp. 60–67.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Fung, M. L. and Gale, D. (2021), ‘Digital home: The missing element for a people-centred digital future’, in A. Argandoña, J. Malala and R. C. Peatfield (eds), The Home in the Digital Age, London: Routledge, pp. 15–37.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Gazi, T. (2017), ‘The new pact on migration and asylum: Supporting or constraining rights of vulnerable groups?’, European Papers, 6:1, pp. 167–75, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.15166/2499-8249/460.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Georgiou, M. and Troszyński, M. (2023), ‘Uprooting and borders: The digital architecture of the Ukrainian refugee crisis’, LSE Public Policy Review, 3:1, pp. 1–9, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.31389/lseppr.93.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Gerlach, I. and Ryndzak, O. (2022), ‘Ukrainian migration crisis caused by the war’, Studia Europejskie: Studies in European Affairs, 26:2, pp. 17–29, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.33067/SE.2.2022.2.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Glick Schiller, N. (1999), ‘Transmigrants and nation states: Something old and something new in the U.S. immigrant experience’, in C. Hirschmann, P. Kasinitz and J. DeWind (eds), Handbook of International Migration: The American Experience, New York: Russel Sage Foundation, pp. 94–119.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Glick Schiller, N. (2018), ‘Theorising transnational migration in our times: A multiscalar temporal perspective’, Nordic Journal of Migration Research, 8:4, pp. 201–12, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.2478/njmr-2018-0032.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Gomes, C. (2017), Transient Mobility and Middle Class Identity: Media and Migration in Australia and Singapore, Singapore: Palgrave MacMillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Gomes, C. (2021), ‘Transience as method: A conceptual lens to understanding evolving trends in migration, mobility, and diversity in the transnational space’, Migration Studies, 9:3, pp. 649–76, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1093/migration/mnz027.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Gomes, C., Berry, M., Alzougool, B. and Chang, S. (2014), ‘Home away from home: International students and their identity-based social networks in Australia’, Journal of International Students, 4:1, pp. 2–15, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.32674/jis.v4i1.493.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Guild, E. and Groenendijk, K. (2023), ‘The impact of war in Ukraine on EU migration’, Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 5, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.3389/fhumd.2023.1189625.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Haas, H. de, Fokkema, T. and Fihri, M. F. (2015), ‘Return migration as failure or success?’, Journal of International Migration & Integration, 16, pp. 415–29, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1007/s12134-014-0344-6.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Hageboutros, J. (2016), ‘The Bosnian refugee crisis: A comparative study of German and Austrian reactions and responses’, Swarthmore International Relations Journal, 1, pp. 50–60, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.24968/2574-0113.1.12.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Hardenberg, N. von (2022), ‘Pull-Effekt: Hat Friedrich Merz recht?’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 11 October, https://www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/ukraine-fluechtlinge-sozialleistungen-1.5672315. Accessed 13 January 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Hergesell, J. (2021), ‘Re-figuration of spaces as long-term social change: The methodological potential of comparative historical sociology for cross-cultural comparison’, Forum Qualitative Research, 22:2, p. 13, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.17169/fqs-22.2.3709.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Hjorth, L. (2011), ‘It’s complicated: A case study of personalisation in an age of social and mobile media’, Communication, Politics & Culture, 44:1, pp. 45–59, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.3316/informit.127649781513814.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Hjorth, L. and Arnold, M. (2013), Online@AsiaPacific: Mobile, Social and Locative Media in the Asia-Pacific, Milton Park: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Horst, H. (2006), ‘The blessings and burdens of communication: Cell phones in Jamaican transnational social fields’, Global Networks, 6:2, pp. 143–59, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00138.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. International Organization of Migration (2022), ‘Ukraine internal displacement report: General population survey, Round 5’, 23 May, https://displacement.iom.int/sites/default/files/public/reports/IOM_Gen%20Pop%20Report_R5_final%20ENG%20%281%29.pdf. Accessed 13 January 2024.
  50. Karaçay, A. B. (2023), ‘Temporary protection regimes in Türkiye and Germany: Comparing Bosnian Syrian and Ukrainian refugee protection regimes’, İmgelem, 7:13, pp. 561–86, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.53791/imgelem.1368731.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Karimi, A. and Byelikova, Y. (2024), ‘Wartime (im)mobilities: Effects of aspirations-capabilities on displaced Ukrainians in Canada and Germany and their viewpoints on those who remain in Ukraine’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 50:10, pp. 2403–22, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/1369183X.2024.2305282.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Kaufmann, K. (2018), ‘Navigating a new life: Syrian refugees and their smartphones in Vienna’, Information, Communication & Society, 21:6, pp. 882–98, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1437205.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Lemoine-Rodríguez, R., Mast, J., Mühlbauer, M., Mandery, N., Biewer, C. and Taubenböck, H. (2024), ‘The voices of the displaced: Mobility and Twitter conversations of migrants of Ukraine in 2022’, Information Processing and Management, 61:3, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1016/j.ipm.2024.103670.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Li, H. (2020), ‘Transnational togetherness through Rela: Chinese queer women’s practices for maintaining ties with the homeland’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 23:5, pp. 692–708, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1177/1367877920923357.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Löw, M. (2016), Sociology of Space, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Luptakova, M. (2009), ‘Legal and illegal migration from Ukraine: An analysis of social and security issues’, International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences (IJCJS), 4:2, pp. 144–59.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Madianou, M. and Miller, D. (2012), Migration and New Media: Transnational Families and Polymedia, London: Routledge.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Maier, D., Stoltenberg, D., Pfetsch, B. and Waldherr, A. (2021), ‘Talking to my community elsewhere: Bringing together networked public spheres and the concept of translocal communities’, in A. Million, C. Haid, I. Castillo Ulloa and N. Baur (eds), Spatial Transformations: Kaleidoscopic Perspectives on the Refiguration of Spaces, London: Routledge, pp. 181–91.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Maishman, E. and Hancock, S. (2022), ‘Ukraine war: US says Iran now Russia’s “top military backer”’, BBC News, 10 December, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-63921007. Accessed 13 January 2024.
  60. Mallett, S. (2004), ‘Understanding home: A critical review of the literature’, The Sociological Review, 52:1, pp. 62–89, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00442.x.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Meagher, B. R. and Cheadle, A. D. (2020), ‘Distant from others, but close to home: The relationship between home attachment and mental health during Covid-19’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101516.
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Neag, A. and Supa, M. (2020), ‘Emotional practices of unaccompanied refugee youth on social media’, International Journal of Cultural Studies, 23:5, pp. 766–86, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1177/1367877920929710.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Nikielska-Sekula, K. (2021), ‘“Have you just taken a picture of me?”: Theoretical and ethical implications of the use of researcher-produced photography in studying migrant minorities’, in K. Nikielska-Sekula and A. Desille (eds), Visual Methodology in Migration Studies New Possibilities, Theoretical Implications, and Ethical Questions, Cham: Springer, pp. 31–49.
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Pink, S., Horst, H., Postill, J., Hjorth, L., Lewis, T. and Tacchi, J. (2016), Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice, London: Sage.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Polish Ministry of Education and Science (2022), ‘Nearly half of refugees in Poland want to return to Ukraine, says new report’, 8 June, https://scienceinpoland.pap.pl/en/news/news%2C92570%2Cnearly-half-refugees-poland-want-return-ukraine-says-new-report.html. Accessed 13 January 2024.
  66. Prieto-Blanko, P. (2021), ‘Afterword: Visual research in migration: (In)visibilities, participation, discourses’, in K. Nikielska-Sekula and A. Desille (eds), Visual Methodology in Migration Studies New Possibilities, Theoretical Implications, and Ethical Questions, Cham: Springer, pp. 327–43.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Pruitt, L. J. and Missbach, A. (2023), ‘The making of “Mary Poppins” migrants: Analysing German discourse on displaced Ukrainians 2022–23 through fictional film’, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, pp. 1–18, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/1369183X.2023.2290452.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Saunders, P. and Williams, P. (1988), ‘The constitution of the home: Towards a research agenda’, Housing Studies, 3:2, pp. 81–93, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/02673038808720618.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Sixsmith, J. (1986), ‘The meaning of home: An exploratory study of environmental experience’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 6:4, pp. 281–98, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1016/S0272-4944(86)80002-0.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Smith, S. G. (1994), ‘The essential qualities of home’, Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14:1, pp. 31–46, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80196-3.
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Steigemann, A. M. and Misselwitz, P. (2020), ‘Architectures of asylum: Making home in a state of permanent temporariness’, Current Sociology, 68:5, pp. 628–50, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1177/0011392120927755.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Teichert, J. (2021), ‘Mediating close friendship intimacy in times of (social) distance’, Networking Knowledge, 14:1, pp. 51–66, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.31165/nk.2021.141.648.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Teichert, J. (2023), Digital Occupants: Wie digitale Medien die kommunikative Aushandlung von Freundschaften verändern, Wiesbaden: Springer VS, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2123/book/10.1007/978-3-658-40623-3. Accessed 13 January 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Teichert, J. and Meister, D. M. (2022), ‘Medien als Vermittlungsinstanz transnationaler Identitäten: deutsche Migrantinnen und Migranten in Großbritannien’, MedienPädagogik, 50, pp. 47–73, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.21240/mpaed/50/2022.12.03.X.
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Tezcan, T. (2018), ‘“I (do not) know what to do”: How ties, identities and home states influence Mexican-born immigrants’ return migration intentions’, Migration and Development, 7:3, pp. 388–411, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/21632324.2018.1457427.
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Udwan, G., Leurs, K. and Alencar, A. (2020), ‘Digital resilience tactics of Syrian refugees in the Netherlands: Social media for social support, health, and identity’, Social Media + Society, 6:2, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1177/2056305120915587.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. UNHCR (2024), ‘Ukraine refugee situation’, https://data.unhcr.org/en/situations/ukraine. Accessed 13 January 2024.
  78. Valenta, M. and Ramet, S. P. (2011), ‘Bosnian migrants: An introduction’, in M. Valenta and S. P. Ramet (eds), The Bosnian Diaspora: Integration in Transnational Communities, London: Routledge, pp. 1–24.
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Visit Ukraine (2023), ‘Returning to the EU: Can Ukrainians re-acquire temporary protection status?’, 25 May, https://visitukraine.today/blog/1940/returning-to-the-eu-can-ukrainians-re-acquire-temporary-protection-status. Accessed 13 January 2024.
  80. Vooren, C. (2022), ‘Das hässliche Gesicht von 2015 kehrt zurück’, Zeit Online, 27 September, https://www.zeit.de/gesellschaft/zeitgeschehen/2022-09/ukraine-fluechtlinge-friedrich-merz-sozialtourismus. Accessed 13 January 2024.
  81. Walsh, K. (2021), ‘A response from home: Intimate subjectivities and (im)mobilities during Covid-19’, Dialogues in Human Geography, 11:1, pp. 157–60, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1177/2043820620937607.
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Weise, K. (2022), ‘Zoff um Aussage des CDU-ChefsMerz beklagt “Sozialtourismus” durch ukrainische Flüchtlinge’, Bild, 27 September, https://www.bild.de/politik/inland/politik-inland/friedrich-merz-im-bild-interview-wir-sind-bereit-zu-regieren-81443654.bild.html. Accessed 13 January 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Wilding, R. (2006), ‘”Virtual” intimacies? Families communicating across transnational context, Global Networks, 6:2, pp. 125–42, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1111/j.1471-0374.2006.00137.x.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/tjtm_00065_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): displacement; forced migrants; housing; migration; refugees’ everyday life; Temporary Protection Directive (TPD); temporary settlement; Ukraine

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test