Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Philosophy of Photography
  4. Volume 15, Issue 1
  5. Article
1-2: Expanded Visualities: Photography and Emerging Technologies
  • ISSN: 2040-3682
  • E-ISSN: 2040-3690

Abstract

In this article I analyse the hidden genealogical link between portrait photography, used for criminological and psychiatric purposes, and contemporary systems of biometric identification of the human face. The aim is to highlight the shift between the emphasis on the importance of the human ‘expert eye’ in recognizing the face when talking about nineteenth-century photography and the use of computer technology that produces and reads digital facial images. In both cases, however, these are modes and variants of reducing and flattening the human face; the face itself disappears under the onslaught of technologies of vision and mediation, becoming a mere data set. Special attention is devoted to the pose, the frontal view, which is the technological a priori of the empirical possibility of recognition, articulated through the history of visualization of the face from early portrait photography to facial recognition systems. Consequently, what we call the ‘face’ is a of individual the face presented to the apparatus: the ‘real’ face is transposed upon multiple technological layers (camera – plates – photographic surface), losing its characteristic features to be re-written according to specific techniques of measurement.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Czech Science Foundation (GACR) (Award 19-26865X)
© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00098_1
2024-06-28
2025-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Armstrong, C. (1998), Scenes in a Library, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Ballantyne, M., Boyer, R. S. and Hines, L. (1996), ‘Woody Bledsoe: His life and legacy’, AI Magazine, 17:1, pp. 7–20.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Benjamin, W. (1999), The Arcades Project, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Benjamin, W. (2003), ‘The Paris of the second empire in Baudelaire’, in M. W. Jennings (ed.), Walter Benjamin: Selected Writings, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 3–92.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bledsoe, W. W. and Browning, I. (1959), ‘Pattern recognition and reading by machine’, in IRE-AIEE-ACM ’59 (Eastern), Boston, MA, 1–3 December, New York: Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 225–32.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Blunt, M. R. and McAllister, H. A. (2009), ‘Mug shot exposure effects: Does size matter?’, Law and Human Behavior, 33:2, pp. 175–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bratton, B. (2015), The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Crawford, K. (2021), Atlas of AI: Power, Politics, and the Planetary Costs of Artificial Intelligence, New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Darwin, C. (1897), The Expression of Emotions in Man and Animals, New York: D. Appleton and Company.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Deleuze, G. (1992), ‘Postscript on the societies of control’, October, 16:59, pp. 3–7.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Didi-Huberman, G. (2003), Invention of Hysteria, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Divyarajsinh, P. N. and Mehta, B. B. (2014), ‘Face recognition methods and applications’, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 4:1, pp. 84–86.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Dobson, J. E. (2023), The Birth of Computer Vision, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Dvořák, T. (2009), Sběrné suroviny, Praha: Filosofia.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Ellis, H. (1890), The Criminal, New York: Scribner and Welford.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Galton, F. (1892), Finger Prints, London and New York: Macmillan.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gates, K. A. (2011), Our Biometric Future: Facial Recognition Technology and the Culture of Surveillance, New York: New York University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Ginzburg, C. (1989), ‘Clues: Roots of an evidential paradigm’, in C. Ginzburg (ed.), Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method, Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press, pp. 77–95.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Gross, R., Shi, J. and Cohn, J. F. (2001), ‘Quo vadis face recognition?’, CVPR ‘01 3rd Workshop on Empirical Evaluation Methods in Computer Vision, Kauai: Carnegie Mellon University, The Robotics Institute, n.pag., https://www.ri.cmu.edu/pub_files/pub3/gross_ralph_2001_1/gross_ralph_2001_1.pdf. Accessed 20 March 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Handler, A. and Frühholz, S. (2021), ‘Eyewitness memory for person identification: Predicting mugbook recognition accuracy according to person description abilities and subjective confidence of witnesses’, Frontiers in Psychology, 12, pp. 1–15.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Jäger, J. (2001), ‘Photography: A means of surveillance? Judicial photography, 1850 to 1900’, Crime, Histoire & Sociétés, 5:1, pp. 27–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Juneja, K. and Rana, C. (2021), ‘An extensive study on traditional-to-recent transformation on face recognition system’, Wireless Personal Communications, 118:4, pp. 3075–128.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Keenan, T. (2014), ‘Counter-forensics and photography’, Grey Room, 14:55, pp. 58–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Keenan, T. (2018), ‘Getting the dead tell me what happened: Justice, prosopopoeia, and forensic afterlives’, Kronos, 44:1, pp. 102–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Kelsey, R. (2015), Photography and the Art of Chance, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Knight, B. and Johnston, A. (1997), ‘The role of movement in face recognition’, Visual Cognition, 4:3, pp. 265–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Kozloff, M. (1976), ‘Nadar and the republic of mind + Tournachon, Felix’, Artforum, 15:1, pp. 28–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Lavater, J. H. (1858), Essays on Physiognomy, London: William Teg.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lombroso, C. (1911), Criminal Man, New York and London: The Knickerbocker Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Manovich, L. (2014), Software Takes Command, New York and London: Bloomsbury.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Masi, I., Wu, Y., Hassner, T. and Natarajan, P. (2018), ‘Deep face recognition: A survey’, Conference on Graphics, Patterns, and Images (SIBGRAPI), Parana, Brazil, 29 October–1 November, New York: IEEE, pp. 472–78.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Melara, M. (1997), ‘Photographics/autographics: Felix Nadar and the face of resemblance’, French Cultural Studies, 8:23, pp. 183–99.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Mitchell, W. J. (2004), Me++: The Cyborg Self and the Networked City, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Moghadan, B., Jebara, T. and Pentland, A. (2000), ‘Bayesian face recognition’, The Journal of Pattern Recognition, 33:11, pp. 1771–82.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Nadar, F. ([1899] 2015), When I Was a Photographer (trans. E. Cadava and L. Theodoratou), Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Paglen, T. (2014), ‘Operational images’, E-flux Journal, 6:59, https://www.e-flux.com/journal/59/61130/operational-images/. Accessed 20 March 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Pantenburg, V. (2016), ‘Working images: Harun Farocki and the operational image’, in J. Eder and C. Klonk (eds), Image Operations: Visual Media and Political Conflict, Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 49–61.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Parikka, J. (2007), Digital Contagions: Media Archaeology of Computer Viruses, Berlin: Peter Lang.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Pettitt, C. (2020), Serial Forms: The Unfinished Project of Modernity, 1815–1848, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Pugliése, J. (2010), Biometrics: Bodies, Technologies, Biopolitics, Abingdon: Taylor and Francis.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Schiff, W., Banka, L. and Galdi, G. B. (1986), ‘Recognizing people seen in events via dynamic “mug shots”’, The American Journal of Psychology, 99:2, pp. 219–31.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Sekula, A. (1984), ‘The instrumental image: Steichen at war’, in A. Sekula (ed.), Photography against the Grain: Essays and Photo Works, 1973–1983, Halifax: The Press of the Nova Scotia College of Art and Design, pp. 33–52.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Sekula, A. (1986), ‘The body and the archive’, October, 10:39, pp. 3–64.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Shaha, P., Sharma, U. and Pawar, K. (2018), ‘Face recognition technology’, International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 1:9, pp. 149–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Smith, M. and Miller, S. (2022), ‘The ethical application of biometric facial recognition technology’, AI & Society, 37:1, pp. 167–75.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Tolba, A. S., El-Baz, A. H. and El-Harby, A. A. (2005), ‘Face recognition: A literature review’, International Journal of Signal Processing, 2:2, pp. 88–103.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Vidocq, F. E. (2003), Memoirs of Vidocq: Master of Crime, Chico, CA: AK Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Waelen, R. A. (2023), ‘The struggle for recognition in the age of facial recognition technology’, AI and Ethics, 3:1, pp. 215–22.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Walkowitz, J. (1992), City of Dreadful Delight: Narratives of Sexual Danger in Late Victorian London, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/pop_00098_1
Loading
  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): computer vision; criminology; digital databases; mugshot; operational image; psychiatry; surveillance

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test