Portuguese and the biobanks: Profiles and attitudes of the Portuguese population towards biobanks for health research

References

1. Abdulghani, S., Afonso, A., Castillo, M., Martín-Fernández, J., Franco, I., Parreira, B., Couto, A., Bruges-Armas, J., Rodrigues, A. M., Gonçalves, A., Dias, A., Toader, I., Lopes, A., Faria, C., Marques, F., Sousa, J. C., Silvestre, R., Pereira, P., Correia, M., Maia, L., Canhão, H. and Dias, S. (2022), ‘The role of biobanks in the fight against COVID-19 pandemic: The Portuguese response’, Acta Medica Portuguesa, 35:6, pp. 411–15.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Antonova, N. and Eritsyan, K. (2022), ‘It is not a big deal: A qualitative study of clinical biobank donation experience and motives’, BMC Medical Ethics, 23:1, pp. 1–11.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Argudo-Portal, V. and Domènech, M. (2020), ‘The reconfiguration of biobanks in Europe under the BBMRI-ERIC framework: Towards global sharing nodes?’, Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 16:1, pp. 1–15.
   [Google Scholar]
4. BBMRI (2013), Biobanks and the Public: Governing Biomedical Research Resources in Europe, Graz: BBMRI.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bledsoe, M. J. (2017), ‘Ethical legal and social issues of biobanking: Past, present and future’, Biopreservation and Biobanking, 15:2, pp. 142–47.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bossert, S., Kahrass, H. and Strech, D. (2018), ‘The public’s awareness of and attitude toward research biobanks: A regional German survey’, Frontiers in Genetics, 9:190, pp. 1–11.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Carapinheiro, G., Serra, H. and Correia, T. (2013), ‘Estado, medicina e políticas em Portugal: Fluxos e refluxos de poder’ (‘State, medicine and politics in Portugal: Flows and ebbs of power’), in F. Alves (ed.), Saúde, Medicina e Sociedade: Uma Visão Sociológica (‘Health, medicine and society: A sociological view’), Lisbon: Pactor, pp. 49–74.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Clarke, A. E., Shim, A. E., Mamo, L., Fosket, J. R. and Fishman, J. R. (2003), ‘Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness and US biomedicine’, American Sociological Review, 68:2, pp. 161–94.
   [Google Scholar]
9. D’Abramo, F., Schildmann, J. and Vollmann, J. (2015), ‘Research participants’ perceptions and views on consent for biobank research: A review of empirical data and ethical analysis’, BMC Medical Ethics, 16:1, pp. 1–11.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Demir, I. and Murtagh, M. J. (2013), ‘Data sharing across biobanks: Epistemic values, data mutability and data incommensurability’, New Genetics and Society, 32:4, pp. 350–65.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Domaradzki, J. and Pawlikowski, J. (2019), ‘Public attitudes toward biobanking of human biological material for research purposes: A literature review’, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16:12, p. 2209, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.3390/ijerph16122209.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Eurobarometer (2010), Special Eurobarometer 341: Biotechnology, Brussels: European Commission.
    [Google Scholar]
13. European Commission (2012), Biobanks for Europe: A Challenge for Governance, Brussels: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation.
    [Google Scholar]
14. European Commission (2013), Commission Decision, 2013-701 – EU Relating to the Constitution of Research Infrastructure Dedicated to Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Consortium for a European Research Infrastructure, Official Journal of the European Union 320 63, 30 November, http://data.europa.eu/eli/dec_impl/2013/701/oj. Accessed 15 July 2016.
    [Google Scholar]
15. FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia) (2020), Portuguese Roadmap of Research Infrastructures 2020 Update, Lisbon: Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fletcher, A. L. (2004), ‘Field of genes: The politics of science and identity in the Estonian genome project’, New Genetics and Society, 23:1, pp. 3–14.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Galison, P. and Hevly, B. (1994), Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gaskell, G. and Gottweis, H. (2011), ‘Biobanks need publicity’, Nature, 471:7337, pp. 159–60, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1038/471159a.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Gaskell, G., Stares, S. and Allansottir, A. (2010), Europeans and Biotechnology in 2010: Winds of change?, Brussels: EC Directorate-General for Research.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Gaskell, G., Gottweis, H., Starkbaum, J., Gerber, M. M., Broerse, J., Gottweis, U., Hobbs, A., Helén, I., Paschou, M., Snell, K. and Soulier, A. (2012), ‘Publics and biobanks: Pan-European diversity and the challenge of responsible innovation’, European Journal of Human Genetics, 21:1, pp. 14–20.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Goisauf, M. and Durnová, A. P. (2019), ‘From engaging publics to engaging knowledges: Enacting “appropriateness” in the Austrian biobank infrastructure’, Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England), 28:3, pp. 275–89.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Gottweis, H., Chen, H. and Starkbaum, J. (2011), ‘Biobanks and the phantom public’, Human Genetics, 130:3, pp. 433–40.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Hoeyer, K. (2012), ‘Size matters: The ethical, legal and social issues surrounding large-scale genetic biobank initiatives’, Norsk Epidemiologi, 21:2, pp. 211–20.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hoeyer, K. (2013), Exchanging Human Bodily Material: Rethinking Bodies and Markets, New York and London: Springer.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Høyer, K. (2002), ‘Conflicting notions of personhood in genetic research’, Anthropology Today, 18:5, pp. 9–13.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Kaufman, D. J., Murphy-Bollinger, J., Scott, J. and Hudson, K. L. (2009), ‘Public opinion about the importance of privacy in biobank research’, American Journal of Human Genetics, 85:5, pp. 643–54.
    [Google Scholar]
27. Lipworth, W., Forsyth, R. and Kerridge, I. (2011), ‘Tissue donation to biobanks: A review of sociological studies’, Sociology of Health and Illness, 33:5, pp. 792–811, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01342.x.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Manson, N. C. (2018), ‘The biobank consent debate: Why “meta-consent” is not the solution?’, Journal of Medical Ethics, 45:5, pp. 291–94.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Marôco, J. (2014), Análise Estatística com o SPSS Statistics (‘Statistical analysis with SPSS statistics’), Pêro Pinheiro: ReportNumber.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Porter, R. (1999), The Greatest Benefit to Mankind: A Medical History from Antiquity to the Present, London: Fontana.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Riso, B. (2021), ‘A saúde armazenada: O biobanco na reconfiguração da saúde na sociedade contemporânea’ (‘Stored health: Biobanks in the reconfiguration of health in the contemporary society’), Ph.D. thesis, Lisbon: Iscte-Instituto Universitário de Lisboa.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Shabani, M. and Borry, P. (2015), ‘Challenges of web-based personal genomic data sharing’, Life Sciences, Society and Policy, 11:3, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1186/s40504-014-0022-7.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Skolbekken, J.-A., Ursin, L. Ø., Solberg, B., Christensen, E. and Ytterhus, B. (2005), ‘Not worth the paper it’s written on? Informed consent and biobank research in a Norwegian context’, Critical Public Health, 15:4, pp. 335–47.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Tabachnick, Barbara G. and Fidell, Linda S. (2006), Using Multivariate Statistics, 5th ed., Boston, MA: Pearson.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Teare, H. J., Morrison, M., Whitley, E. A. and Kaye, J. (2015), ‘Towards “engagement 2.0”: Insights from a study of dynamic consent with biobank participants’, Digital Health, 1, pp. 1–13.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Tupasela, A. (2021), Populations as Brands: Marketing National Resources for Global Data Markets, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Tutton, R. (2010), ‘Biobanking: Social, political and ethical aspects’, in eLS (ed.), Encyclopedia of Life Sciences, pp. 1–7, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1002/9780470015902.a0022083.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Zika. E., Paci, D., Schulte in den Bäumen, T., Braun, A., Rijkers-Defrasne, S., Deschênes, M., Fortier, I., Laage-Hellman, J., Scerri, C. A. and Ibarreta, D. (2010), Biobanks in Europe: Prospects for Harmonisation and Networking, Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, JRC57831.
    [Google Scholar]