Skip to content
1981
image of ENGOs and environmental communication: Examining communication strategies of one Brazilian and one US American ENGO

Abstract

This cross-national study draws from the GPDS framework to explore the outreach strategies of two environmental non-governmental organizations (ENGOs) – one in Ohio, United States, and the other in Paraná, Brazil. The study examined and compared ENGOs’ targeted communication practices and their efforts to engage with racial/ethnic and socio-economic minorities within charged political climates. Semi-structured qualitative interview results with ENGO employees and board members show similarities in public outreach strategies, challenges operating in politically charged environments and intentions to address the needs of low socio-economic and minority members of local communities. Many of the communication strategies described as being used by participants correspond to the social marketing theory (SMT) framework. However, ENGO employees reported low levels of confidence in effectively engaging their audience, mostly due to lack of strategic communication training and resources.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00114_1
2024-08-12
2025-02-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Akbar, M. Bilal and Barnes, Elizabeth (2023), ‘Verification of GPDS planning framework for social marketing: A Delphi method’, International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, January, pp. 131.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Akbar, M. Bilal, Foote, Liz, Lawson, Alison, French, Jeff, Deshpande, Sameer and Lee, Nancy R. (2021), ‘The social marketing paradox: Challenges and opportunities for the discipline’, International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 19:August, pp. 36789.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Andreasen, Alan (1994), ‘Social marketing: Its domain and definition’, Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 13:1, pp. 10814.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Archer, Kistjan and Ray, Julie (2019), ‘Brazilians least satisfied in Amazon with environment’, Gallup, 20 August, https://news.gallup.com/poll/266183/brazilians-least-satisfied-amazon-environment.aspx. Accessed 8 November 2023.
  5. Banzhaf, Spencer, Ma, Lala and Timmins, Christopher (2019), ‘Environmental justice: The economics of race, place, and pollution’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33:1, pp. 185208.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. BBC News (2023), ‘Brazil country profile’, BBC News, 10 January, https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-18909529. Accessed 10 January 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Belias, Dimitrio and Koustelios, Athanasios (2014), ‘Organizational culture and job satisfaction: A review’, International Review of Management and Marketing, 4:2, pp. 13249.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Beling Loose, Eloisa (2023), ‘A desigualdade agravada pelos desastres’ (‘The inequality aggravated by disasters’), Grupo de Pesquisa Jornalismo Ambiental, 6 April, https://jornalismoemeioambiente.com/2023/04/06/a-desigualdade-agravada-pelos-desastres/. Accessed 8 November 2023.
  9. Braun, Virginia and Clarke, Victoria (2006), ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’, Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3:2, pp. 77101.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Breitmeier, Helmut and Rittberger, Volker (2000), ‘Environmental NGOs in an emerging global civil society’, in P. S. Chasek (ed.), The Global Environment in the Twenty-First Century: Prospects for International Cooperation, New York: United Nations, pp. 13063.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Briandana, Rizki and Saleh, Mohamad Saifudin Mohamad (2022), ‘Implementing environmental communication strategy towards climate change through social media in Indonesia’, Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, online first, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.30935/ojcmt/12467.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Chambers, Deborah (2021), ‘Emerging temporalities in the multiscreen home’, Media, Culture & Society, 43:7, pp. 118096, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1177/0163443719867851.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Climate Impact Lab (2023), ‘Climate impact map: Modeling for median probability of high emissions model in twenty years’, Climate Impact Lab, https://impactlab.org/map/#usmeas=absolute&usyear=2020-2039&gmeas=absolute&gyear=2020-2039&tab=global. Accessed 8 November 2023.
  14. Cox, Robert and Schwarze, Steve (2022), ‘The media/communication strategies of environmental NGOs’, in A. Hansen and R. Cox (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Cugelman, Brian, Thelwall, Mike and Dawes, Phil (2011), ‘Online interventions for social marketing health behavior change campaigns: A meta-analysis of psychological architectures and adherence factors’, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13:1, p. e1367.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Dibb, Sally (2014), ‘Up, up and away: Social marketing breaks free’, Journal of Marketing Management, 30:11–12, pp. 115985.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Edelman (2021), ‘21st Annual Edelman Trust Barometer’, Edelman, https://www.edelman.com/sites/g/files/aatuss191/files/2021-03/2021%20Edelman%20Trust%20Barometer.pdf. Accessed 8 November 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Elias, Troy, Blaine, Mark, Morrison, Deborah and Harris, Brandon (2019), ‘Media use, cross-national samples, and the theory of planned behavior: Implications for climate change advocacy intentions’, International Journal of Communication, 13:2019, pp. 3694718.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Funk, Cary (2021), ‘How Americans’ attitudes about climate change differ by generation, party and other factors’, Pew Research Center, 26 May, https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/05/26/key-findings-how-americans-attitudes-about-climate-change-differ-by-generation-party-and-other-factors/. Accessed 11 November 2022.
  20. Green, Kevin M., Crawford, Brian. A., Williamson, Katherine. A. and DeWan, Amelie A. (2019), ‘A meta-analysis of social marketing campaigns to improve global conservation outcomes’, Social Marketing Quarterly, 25:1, pp. 6987.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hancock, Lorin (2020), ‘What is the Atlantic Forest and why do we need to save it?’, World Wildlife Fund (WWF), 25 May, https://www.worldwildlife.org/stories/what-is-the-atlantic-forest-and-why-do-we-need-to-save-it. Accessed 1 November 2021.
  22. Hanson, Gordon H. (2023), Local Labor Market Impacts of the Energy Transition: Prospects and Policies, No. w30871, Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research, https://www.nber.org/papers/w30871. Accessed 8 November 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) (2011), Censo 2010 (‘2010 census’), Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, https://censo2010.ibge.gov.br/resultados.html. Accessed 17 November 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE) (2022), Acesso à internet e à televisão e posse de telefone móvel celular para uso pessoal em 2022 (‘Access to the internet and television and ownership of personal mobile phone for personal use 2022’), 102040, Rio de Janeiro: IBGE, https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/visualizacao/livros/liv102040_informativo.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) (2021), Situation of Human Rights in Brazil, OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc.9/21, Washington, DC: IACHR, http://www.oas.org/en/iachr/reports/pdfs/Brasil2021-en.pdf. Accessed 2 October 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kirk, Karin (2023), ‘Which state is winning at renewable energy production?’, Yale Climate Connections, 23 February, https://yaleclimateconnections.org/2023/02/us-state-with-most-renewable-energy-production/. Accessed 23 October 2023.
  27. Kotler, Phillip and Zaltman, Gerald (1971), ‘Social marketing: An approach to planned social change’, Journal of Marketing, 35:3, pp. 312.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Le Busque, Brianna and Litchfield, Carla (2023), ‘Sharks, spiders, snakes, oh my: A review of creature feature films’, Journal of Environmental Media, 4:1, pp. 4975.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Lopes de Oliveira, Diogo and Lewenstein, Bruce V. (2024), ‘Supporting activism in Latin America: The role of science communication, science journalism, and NGOs in socio-environmental conflicts’, Journalism Studies, 25:5, pp. 50117.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Mcgregor, Shannon C., Mourão, Rachel R., Neto, Ivo, Straubhaar, Joseph D. and Angeluci, Alan (2017), ‘Second screening as convergence in Brazil and the United States’, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 61:1, pp. 16381.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Mikati, Ihab, Benson, Adam F., Luben, Thomas J., Sacks, Jason D. and Richmond-Bryant, Jennifer (2018), ‘Disparities in distribution of particulate matter emission sources by race and poverty status’, American Journal of Public Health, 108:4, pp. 48085.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Mohai, Paul, Pellow, David and Roberts, J. T. (2009), ‘Environmental justice’, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 34:1, pp. 40530.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Mourão, Rachel R. and Sturm, Heloisa A. (2018), ‘Environmental journalism in Brazil: History, characteristics, and framing of disasters’, in B. Takahashi, J. Pinto, M. Chavez and M. Vigón (eds), News Media Coverage of Environmental Challenges in Latin America and the Caribbean: Mediating Demand, Degradation and Development, Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 6790.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Nicas, Jack and Spigariol, André (2023), ‘Bolsonaro agrees to transition, two days after losing Brazil election’, New York Times, 8 January, https://www.nytimes.com/2022/11/01/world/americas/bolsonaro-protest-brazil-election.html. Accessed 8 November 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. de Onís, Catalina M. and Lloréns, Hilda (2022), ‘Visualizing green capitalist renewable energy: Development and grassroots solar community alternatives in Puerto Rico’, Journal of Environmental Media, 3:1, pp. 12532.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Pew Research Center (2021), ‘Internet/broadband fact sheet’, Pew Research Center, 31 May, https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/internet-broadband/?menuItem=3109350c-8dba-4b7f-ad52-a3e976ab8c8f. Accessed 28 October 2022.
  37. Pollin, Robert, Wicks-Lim, Jeannatte, Chakraborty, Shouvik and Semieniuk, Gregor (2020), ‘Impacts of the Reimagina Appalachia & Clean Energy Transition Programs for Ohio’, Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) University of Massachusetts-Amherst, October, https://peri.umass.edu/images/OhioGreenGrowth_101920_FINAL_230.pdf. Accessed 23 October 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Popovich, Nadja and Schlossberg, Tatiana (2017), ‘Over 23 environmental rules rolled back in Mr. Trump’s first 100 days’, New York Times, 2 May, https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/05/02/climate/environmental-rules-reversed-trump-100-days.html. Accessed 10 January 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Poushter, Jacob and Huang, Christine (2019), ‘Climate change still seen as the top global threat, but cyberattacks a rising concern’, Pew Research Center, 10 February, https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/02/10/climate-change-still-seen-as-the-top-global-threat-but-cyberattacks-a-rising-concern/. Accessed 11 April 2021.
  40. Rundle-Thiele, Sharyn, David, Patricia, Willmott, Taylor, Pang, Bo, Eagle, Lynne and Hay, Rachel (2019), ‘Social marketing theory development goals: An agenda to drive change’, Journal of Marketing Management, 35:1–2, pp. 16081.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Simões, Mariana (2019), ‘Brazil’s Bolsonaro on the environment, in his own words’, New York Times, 27 August, https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/27/world/americas/bolsonaro-brazil-environment.html. Accessed 13 November 2022 and 8 November 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Sweat, Michael D., Denison, Julie, Kennedy, Caitlin, Tedrow, Virginia and O’Reilly, Kevin (2012), ‘Effects of condom social marketing on condom use in developing countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 1990–2010’, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 90:8, pp. 61322A.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Tegelberg, Matthew (2023), ‘Finding hope, resilience and imagining ways forward through climate fiction’, Journal of Environmental Media, 4:1, pp. 9599.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Tracy, Sarah J. (2019), Qualitative Research Methods: Collecting Evidence, Crafting Analysis, Communicating Impact, 2nd ed., Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Troy, Cassandra L. C. and Skurka, Chris (2023), ‘Being outdoorsy indoors: Nature connectedness through 360-degree images and video’, Journal of Environmental Media, 4:1, pp. 2747.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Tyson, Alec, Funk, Cary and Kennedy, Brian (2023), ‘What the data says about Americans views of climate’, Pew Research Center, 9 August, https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/08/09/what-the-data-says-about-americans-views-of-climate-change/#:~:text=Overall%2C%2037%25%20of%20Americans%20say,a%20Center%20survey%20from%20January. Accessed 8 November 2023.
  47. U.S. Census (2020),  ‘U.S. Census Bureau quickfacts: United States’, https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045219. Accessed 3 November 2021.
  48. Wang, Yuanni, Cao, Hailin, Yuan, Yingchun and Zhang, Ruilian (2020), ‘Empowerment through emotional connection and capacity building: Public participation through environmental non-governmental organizations’, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 80, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1016/j.eiar.2019.106319.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00114_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jem_00114_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test