Skip to content
1981
1-2: 6th International Dance and Somatic Practices Conference - Reconnections: Looking back, moving forward, enacting change
  • ISSN: 1757-1871
  • E-ISSN: 1757-188X

Abstract

Research into physical simulation practices across industries (aviation, transport and healthcare), provides insights into embodied knowledge. Embodied knowledge informed by dance knowledge can positively expand the capacity of workplace training. Through a detailed examination of a variety of technologically advanced industry environments where embodied knowledge is applied, this article identifies the ways in which dance knowledge can be transformed into new and enhanced forms of embodied participation. The question of how dance knowledge is transferred across industries is addressed through theories of embodied cognition paired with emergent communication strategies from human–computer interaction and human factors. Key insights extend concepts of somatic practice across arts and industry for mutual benefit.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Deakin University
  • Coventry University
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jdsp_00127_1
2024-12-06
2025-04-30
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bauer, M. and Klingauf, U. (2008), ‘Virtual-reality as a future training medium for civilian flight procedure training’, in AIAA Modeling and Simulation Technologies Conference and Exhibit, Honolulu, HI, 18–21 August, Reston, VA: AIAA, p. 7030, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.2514/6.2008-7030.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Biocca, F. (1997), ‘The cyborg’s dilemma: Progressive embodiment in virtual environments’, Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3:2, JCMC324, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00070.x.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Block, B. and Kissell, J. L. (2001), ‘The dance: Essence of embodiment’, Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 22:1, pp. 515.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Brannigan, E. (2010), ‘Moving across disciplines: Dance in the twenty-first century’, Platform Papers, 25, pp. 1016.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Birk, M. V., Atkins, C., Bowey, J. T. and Mandryk, R. L. (2016), ‘Fostering intrinsic motivation through avatar identification in digital games’, in Association for Computing Machinery (ed.), Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, 7–12 May, New York: ACM, pp. 298295.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. (1998), ‘The extended mind’, Analysis, 58:1, pp. 719.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. DeLahunta, S., Barnard, P. and McGregor, W. (2009), ‘28 augmenting choreography’, Contemporary Choreography: A Critical Reader, 431, pp. 43147.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Harvie, D. S., Smith, R. T., Moseley, G. L., Meulders, A., Michiels, B. and Sterling, M. (2020), ‘Illusion-enhanced virtual reality exercise for neck pain: A replicated single case series’, The Clinical Journal of Pain, 36:2, pp. 10109.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Hay, D. (2000), My Body, the Buddhist, Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Hutchins, E. (2003), ‘Cognitive ethnography’, in K. Forbus, D. Gentner and T. Regier (eds), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Boston, MA, USA, 31 July–3 August, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., https://escholarship.org/uc/item/16t462hb. Accessed 4 August 2004.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Hutchins, E. (2006), ‘The distributed cognition perspective on human interaction’, in Roots of Human Sociality: Culture, Cognition and Interaction, London: Routledge, pp. 37598, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.4324/9781003135517.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Kirsh, D. (2009), ‘Interaction, external representation and sense making’, in N. Taatgen, H. van Rijn, J. Nerbonne and L. Schomaker (eds), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Amsterdam, the Netherlands, 29 July–1 August, Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 110308.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kirsh, D. (2010), ‘Thinking with the body’, in S. Ohlsson and R. Catrambone (eds), Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Portland, OR, USA, 11–14 August, Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, pp. 17694.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Kirsh, D. (2013), ‘Embodied cognition and the magical future of interaction design’, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20:1, pp. 130.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Laurel, B. (2016), ‘What is virtual reality?’, Medium, 16 June, https://medium.com/@blaurel/what-is-virtual-reality-77b876d829ba. Accessed 9 August 2024.
  16. Leach, J. and DeLahunta, S. (2017), ‘Dance becoming knowledge: Designing a digital “body”’, Leonardo, 50:5, pp. 46167.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Malani, D. (2018), interview with S. Neville, Adelaide, June.
  18. Mildred, T. (2017), interview with S. Neville, SYDAC Adelaide, May.
  19. Neville, S. (2024), ‘Agile Embodiment’, https://www.sarahneville.com/. Accessed 13 September 2024.
  20. Newen, A., De Bruin, L. and Gallagher, S. (2018), The Oxford Handbook of 4E Cognition, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Pakes, A. (2003), ‘Original embodied knowledge: The epistemology of the new in dance practice as research’, Research in Dance Education, 4:2, pp. 12749.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Piumsomboon, T., Lee, G. A., Hart, J. D., Ens, B., Lindeman, R. W., Thomas, B. H. and Billinghurst, M. (2018), ‘Mini-me: An adaptive avatar for mixed reality remote collaboration’, in Association for Computing Machinery (ed.), Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Canada, 21–26 April, New York: ACM, pp. 113, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1145/3173574.3173620.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Schubert, T., Friedmann, F. and Regenbrecht, H. (1998), ‘Embodied presence in virtual environments’, in R. Paton and I. Neilson (eds), Visual Representations and Interpretations, London: Springer Verlag, pp. 26978.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Stanton, N. and Baber, C. (1996), ‘A systems approach to human error identification’, Safety Science, 22:1–3, pp. 21528.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Stunnel, A. (2018), interview with S. Neville, Adelaide SA Sims, June.
  26. Thomas, M. J. (2017), Training and Assessing Non-Technical Skills: A Practical Guide, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Varela, F. J., Thompson, E. and Rosch, E. (2017), The Embodied Mind, Revised Edition: Cognitive Science and Human Experience, Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Caserman, P., Garcia-Agundez, A., Gámez Zerban, A. and Göbel, S. (2021), ‘Cybersickness in current-generation virtual reality head-mounted displays: Systematic review and outlook’, Virtual Reality, 25:4, pp. 115370.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Cross, J. I., Boag-Hodgson, C., Ryley, T., Mavin, T. and Potter, L. E. (2022), ‘Using extended reality in flight simulators: A literature review’, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 29:9, pp. 396175, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3173921.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Dörr, K., Schiefele, J. and Kubbat, W. (2001), ‘Virtual cockpit simulation for pilot training’, in North Atlantic Treaty Organization (eds), RTO Meeting Proceedings, 58, March, p. 11.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Guo, Z., Zhou, D., Zhou, Q., Zhang, X., Geng, J., Zeng, S., Lv, C. and Hao, A. (2020), ‘Applications of virtual reality in maintenance during the industrial product lifecycle: A systematic review’, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 56, pp. 52538.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hollan, J. D. and Hutchins, E. L. (2009), ‘Opportunities and challenges for augmented environments: A distributed cognition perspective’, in Designing User Friendly Augmented Work Environments: From Meeting Rooms to Digital Collaborative Spaces, London: Springer, pp. 23759.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hutchins, E. (2000), ‘Distributed cognition’, International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 138, pp. 110.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Hutchins, E. and Klausen, T. (1996), ‘Distributed cognition in an airline cockpit’, in Y. Engeström and D. Middleton (eds), Cognition and Communication at Work, Cambridge University Press, pp. 1534.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Oberhauser, M. and Dreyer, D. (2017), ‘A virtual reality flight simulator for human factors engineering’, Cognition, Technology & Work, 19:2–3, pp. 26377.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Stevens, C. and McKechnie, S. (2005), ‘Thinking in action: Thought made visible in contemporary dance’, Cognitive Processing, 6:4, pp. 24352.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Thomas, M. J. W. (2018), Training and Assessing Non-Technical Skills: A Practical Guide, London: CRC Press, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1201/9781315550336.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Thomas, M. (2019), interview with Neville, Adelaide Westwood Thomas Associates, November.
  39. Yavrucuk, I., Kubali, E. and Tarimci, O. (2011), ‘A low cost flight simulator using virtual reality tools’, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 26:4, pp. 1014.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jdsp_00127_1
Loading
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test