Skip to content
1981
image of Boosting global sales and transnational circulation: Public financing of film and TV fiction and animation in Flanders and Denmark

Abstract

This article examines the role of public financiers in the context of digital distribution and the increased involvement of global streamers in financing local content. Through a comparative analysis, it explores how screen policy mixes aimed at funding fiction and animation films and series in two small European markets, Denmark and Flanders, adapt to and influence the transnational orientation in response to globalization and the rise of online distribution. Based on interviews in Denmark and Flanders combined with data analysis, the article shows that in the context of rising production budgets, transnational production and intense international competition, screen agencies and other public financiers have also become more transnationally oriented. Both in Flanders and Denmark, screen agencies put increased emphasis on enabling international financing and distribution opportunities for fiction and animation films and series. How to regulate and co-finance with global streamers has become an important question for policy stakeholders. As echoed in the interviews, producers in Flanders and Denmark agree that outward-looking policies for attracting commercial financing are becoming more important for strengthening the financing base of local works. It is significant to outline that policies fostering transnational financing and distribution do not stand in opposition to cultural protectionism. For example, investment obligations for global streamers can have the dual function of safeguarding the production ecology while promoting transnational sale and distribution. In smaller markets, such as Denmark and Flanders, aligning policy tools is essential, given that public funding for fiction and animation is crucial lever for achieving ambitious budgets and attracting private financing.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00157_1
2024-09-24
2025-02-07
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Bondebjerg, I. (2016), ‘Regional and global dimensions of Danish film culture and film policy’, in M. Hjort and U. Lindqvist (eds), A Companion to Nordic Cinema, New York: John Wiley & Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Cunningham, P., Edler, J., Flanagan, K. and Laredo, P. (2013), Innovation Policy Mix and Instrument Interaction: A Review, Manchester: University of Manchester, https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/innovation_policy_mix_and_instrument_interaction.pdf. Accessed 18 July 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Danish Film Institute (DFI) (2013), Digital for Danish Film: Opportunities and Challenges: Report from Film Political Forum, Copenhagen: Danish Film Institute, https://www.dfi.dk/sites/default/files/docs/2018-02/Digitale-udfordringer-og-muligheder-061113.pdf. Accessed 14 May 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Danish Film Institute (DFI) (2013), Aktuelle Markedstendenser: En gennemgang af trends og tendenser set i lyset af digitaliseringen af de danske biografer og streaming-tjenesternes indtog på markedet, Copenhagen: DFI, https://www.dfi.dk/omdfi/publikationer/aktuelle-markedstendenser. Accessed 7 August 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Danish Film Institute (DFI) (2017), Analyse af film-branches nye forretningsmodeller 2017, Copenhagen: DFI, https://www.dfi.dk/files/docs/2018-02/Analyse_af_filmbranchens%20nye_forretningsmodeller%20%281%29.pdf. Accessed 25 March 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Danish Film Institute (DFI) (2018), Medie- & Filmpolitisk oplæg 2019–2022, Copenhagen: DFI, https://www.dfi.dk/omdfi/publikationer/medie-filmpolitisk-oplaeg-2019-2022. Accessed 9 September 2023.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Department of Culture, Youth and Media (2023), ‘More investments in Flemish productions thanks to a new incentive scheme’, 17 March, https://www.benjamindalle.be/post/meer-investeringen-in-vlaamse-producties-dankzij-nieuwe-stimuleringsregeling. Accessed 19 August 2023.
  8. Dickinson, M. and Harvey, S. (2005), ‘Public policy and public funding for film: Some recent developments in the UK’, Screen, 46:1, pp. 8796.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Domazetovikj, N., Raats, T. and Donders, K. (2024), ‘Global SVoD services in small audio-visual market contexts: Commissioning patterns in Flanders, Ireland and Norway’, Journal of Digital Media & Policy, Special Issue: ‘European-Based VoDs: Models, Alternatives and Predictions’, 15:2, pp. 21335, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1386/jdmp_00147_1.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. European Commission (EC) (2023), ‘European media industry outlook’, 18 May, https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/european-media-industry-outlook. Accessed 29 August 2023.
  11. Eichner, S. and Esser, A. (2020), ‘Key international markets: Distribution and consumption of Danish TV drama series in Germany and the UK’, in J. Hammett-Jamart, P. Mitric and E. N. Redvall (eds), Danish Television Drama: Global Lessons from a Small Nation, London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 187207.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Eskilsson, T. (2022), Public Film Funding at a Crossroads, Trollhättan: Film i Vast.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E. and Laranja, M. (2011), ‘Reconceptualising the “policy mix” for innovation’, Research Policy, 40:5, pp. 70213.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Fontaine, G. (2024), ‘Audiovisual services spending on original European content: 2024 edition’, European Audiovisual Observatory, https://rm.coe.int/investments-in-original-european-content-2024-edition-september-2024-g/1680b17ccf. Accessed 15 September 2024.
  15. Gibbs, G. R. (2014), ‘Using software in qualitative analysis’, in U. Flick (ed.), The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Data Analysis, London: Sage Publications, pp. 27794.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Hammett-Jamart, J., Mitric, P. and Redvall, E. N. (2018), European Film and Television Co-Production: Policy and Practice, London: Palgrave.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hansen, K. T. (2020), ‘Glocal perspectives on Danish television series: Co-producing crime narratives for commercial public service’, in A. M. Waade, E. N. Redvall and P. J. Jenesen (eds), Danish Television Drama: Global Lessons from a Small Nation, London: Palgrave, pp. 83101.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Hill, J. (2016), ‘Living with Hollywood: British film policy and the definition of “nationality”’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 22:5, pp. 70623.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Hill, J. and Kawashima, N. (2016), ‘Introduction: Film policy in a globalised cultural economy’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 22:5, pp. 66772.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Hjort, M. (2010), ‘Affinitive and milieu-building transnationalism’, in D. Iordanova, D. Martin-Jones and B. Vidal (eds), Cinema at the Periphery, Detroit, MI: Wayne State University Press, pp. 14455.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Howlett, M. and del Rio, P. (2015), ‘The parameters of policy portfolios: Verticality and horizontality in design spaces and their consequences for policy mix formulation’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33:5, pp. 123345.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Howlett, M. and del Rio, P. (2022), ‘Portfolios of policy tools’, in M. Howlett (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Policy Tools, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Howlett, M., Mukherjee, I. and Rayner, J. (2018), ‘Understanding policy designs over time: Layering, stretching, patching and packaging’, in M. Howlett and I. Mukherjee (eds), Routledge Handbook of Policy Design, London: Routledge, pp. 13644.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Howlett, M. and Rayner, J. (2007), ‘Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in “new governance arrangements”’, Policy and Society, 26:4, pp. 118.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Howlett, M. and Rayner, J. (2018), ‘Coherence, congruence and consistency in policy mixes’, in M. Howlett and I. Mukherjee (eds), Routledge Handbook of Policy Design, London: Routledge, pp. 389403.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Kern, F. and Howlett, M. (2009), ‘Implementing transition management as policy reforms: A case study of the Dutch energy sector’, Policy Sciences, 42:4, pp. 391408.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kern, F., Rogge, K. S. and Howlett, M. (2019), ‘Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies’, Research Policy, 48:10, pp. 115.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kostovska, I., Raats, T. and Donders, K. (2020a), ‘The rise of the “Netflix tax”and what it means for sustaining European audiovisual markets’, Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 33:4, pp. 42341.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Kostovska, I., Raats, T., Donders, K. and Ballon, P. (2020b), ‘Going beyond the hype: Conceptualising “media ecosystem” for media management research’, Journal of Media Business Studies, 18:1, pp. 626.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Kostovska, I., Komorowski, M., Raats, T. and Tintel, S. (2023), ‘“Netflix taxes” as tools for supporting European audiovisual ecosystems: Policy interventions for rights retention by independent producers’, in H. Ranaivoson, S. Broughton Micova and T. Raats (eds), European Audiovisual Policy in Transition, London: Routledge, pp. 15776.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Ladegaard, C. (2016), ‘Why automatic funding sucks!’, presentation delivered at Sixth Workshop of Medici in Warth, Switzerland, 28 September.
  32. Lotz, A. D. and Lobato, R. (eds) (2023), Streaming Video: Storytelling Across Borders, New York: New York University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Lundberg, R. F. (2023), ‘Film director opens up about streaming collaboration: Control risks being lost’, Kulturmonitor.dk, 13 April, https://kulturmonitor.dk/film/art9302176/Kontrollen-risikerer-at-g%C3%A5-tabt. Accessed 23 June 2023.
  34. Maor, M. (2020), ‘Policy over- and under-design: An information quality perspective’, Policy Sciences, 53:3, pp. 395411.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Mattelart, A. (2000), ‘European film policy and the response to Hollywood’, in J. Hill and P. C. Gibson (eds), World Cinema: Critical Approaches, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. McElroy, R. and Noonan, C. (2019), Producing British Television Drama: Local Production in a Global Era, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. McElroy, R. and Noonan, C. (2022), ‘Film policy, social value, and the mediating role of screen agencies’, in M. Hjort and T. Nannicelli (eds), A Companion to Motion Pictures and Public Value, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 382400.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Mingant, N. and Tirtaine, C. (eds) (2017), Reconceptualising Film Policies, New York: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Mitric, P. (2020), ‘Empowering the minority co-producer through European financial co-productions: The case of DFI International’, Journal of Scandinavian Cinema, 10:2, pp. 15167.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Mundell, R. A. (1962), ‘The appropriate use of monetary and fiscal policy for internal and external stability’, Staff Papers, 9:1, pp. 7079.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Natow, R. S. (2020), ‘The use of triangulation in qualitative studies employing elite interviews’, Qualitative Research, 20:2, pp. 16073.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Nordisk Film and TV Fond (n.d.), ‘About us’, https://nordiskfilmogtvfond.com/about-us. Accessed 19 September 2024.
  43. O’Regan, T. (2008), ‘The political economy of film’, in M. Renov and J. Sonald (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Film Studies, London: Sage Publications, pp. 24461.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Raats, T., Evens, T. and Ruelens, S. (2016), ‘Challenges for sustaining local audio-visual ecosystems: Analysis of financing and production of domestic TV fiction in small media markets’, Journal of Popular Television, 4:1, pp. 12947.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Rogge, K. S., Kern, F. and Howlett, M. (2017), ‘Conceptual and empirical advances in analysing policy mixes for energy transitions’, Energy Research & Social Science, Special Issue: ‘Policy Mixes for Energy Transitions’, 33, pp. 110.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Screen Flanders (n.d.), ‘About us’, http://screenflanders.be/en/about-us. Accessed 18 October 2023.
  47. Sørensen, I. E. and Redvall, E. N. (2021), ‘Does automatic funding suck? The cost and value of automatic funding in small nation screen industries in Northern Europe’, International Journal of Cultural Policy, 27:3, pp. 298311.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Sorrell, S., Smith, A., Betz, R., Walz, R., Boemare, C., Quirion, P., Sijm, J., Konidari, D. M. P., Vassos, S., Haralampopoulos, D. and Pilinis, C. (2003), Interaction in EU Climate Policy, Sussex: SPRU.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Stærmose, B. (2023), Camino, Denmark: Viaplay.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Vlaams Audiovisueel Fonds (VAF) (2023), Beheersovereenkomst 2022–2025 tussen de Vlaamse Gemeenschap en het Vlaams Audiovisueel Fonds vzw met betrekking tot het VAF/MEDIAFONDS, Brussels: Vlaams Audiovisueel Fonds.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Vlaams Audiovisueel Fonds (VAF) (2024), VAF/Filmfonds: Deelreglement creatie, Brussels: Vlaams Audiovisueel Fonds.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Willems, G. (2016), ‘Cinema, the government, and the popular: Popular and commercial aspects of cultural film support in Flanders (Belgium)’, Journal of Popular Film and Television, 44:4, pp. 22735.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Willems, G., Biltereyst, D. and Vande Winkel, R. (2020), ‘Film en natievorming in Vlaanderen’, in G. Willems and B. De Wever (eds), De verbeelding van de leeuw: een geschiedenis van media en natievorming in Vlaanderen, Antwerp: Peristyle, pp. 22261.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Willems, G., Vande Winkel, R. and Biltereyst, D. (2021), ‘The nation on and beyond the screen: A history of film and nation-building in Flanders’, Nations and Nationalism, 27:3, pp. 81630.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00157_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jdmp_00157_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test