Skip to content
1981
Volume 3, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2634-1123
  • E-ISSN: 2634-1131

Abstract

The history and work of the Independent Group, this important collective of creative practitioners which met from 1952 to 1955, has recently attracted unprecedented levels of attention. However, within the fields of architectural, art and design history, the issue of social class is largely absent in recent work and oversimplified in twentieth-century accounts. This is despite the recent increase in class analysis being applied to the British creative and university sectors. Using Potvin and Marchand’s methodology of agency and the work on social class by Bev Skeggs as well as my own background, the article brings more specificity to the question of the working-class avant-garde and the Independent Group, using new research into the backgrounds of its members. Public funding enabled many who would not traditionally have benefitted from tertiary education to undertake full-time study, and this class dynamic made a difference to the post-war cultural landscape in the United Kingdom. The power of working-class agency within and against pre-existing elite structures is a key theme of the article. Working-class culture is a vital, yet hitherto marginalized, component of the Independent Group project. The article asks why references to social class are notably absent from accounts of post-war British art and design.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/jclc_00044_1
2024-12-18
2025-04-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Alloway, L. (1954a), Collages and Objects, exhibition catalogue, ICA, London, 13 October–20 November.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Alloway, L. (1954b), ‘Tate Archives, Morland Collection of records relating to the history of the ICA, 955/1’, unpublished press release, 8 October, https://archive.tate.org.uk/Record.aspx?src=CalmView.Catalog&id=TGA+955%2f1&pos=3. Accessed 1 April 2024.
  3. Alloway, L. (1957), ‘Personal statement’, ARK, 19, spring, p. 28.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Alloway, L. (1970), ‘The development of British pop’, in L. R. Lippard (ed.), Pop Art, London: Thames & Hudson, pp. 2768.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Alloway, L. (1981), unpublished letter to A. Massey, 16 May.
  6. Baas, J. (1990), ‘Introduction’, in D. Robbins (ed.), The Independent Group: Postwar Britain and the Aesthetics of Plenty, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, pp. 811.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Banham, P. R. (1958), ‘The theory of modern architecture 1907–1927’, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, London: University of London (Courtauld Institute of Art).
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Banham, R. (1948), ‘Revolutionaries in art: Czechoslovak painters and sculptors’, Eastern Daily Press, 13 January, p. 2.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Banham, R. (1954), ‘Collages at ICA’, Art News and Review, 6, October, p. 8.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Banham, R. (1964), ‘The atavism of the short-distance mini-cyclist’, Living Arts, 3, pp. 9197.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cooper, J. (1979), Fathers of Pop, London: Arts Council.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Crow, T. (2014), The Long March of Pop: Art, Music and Design 1930–1995, New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Faulkner, S. (2013), ‘British pop and the high/low divide’, in D. Arnold and D. P. Corbett (eds), A Companion to British Art: 1600 to the Present, Chichester: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 15679.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. General Register Office of Scotland (1922), John McHale, Register of Births in Scotland, Public Records Office: London.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Hebdige, D. (1983), ‘In poor taste: Notes on pop’, BLOCK, 8, pp. 5468.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Highmore, B. (2017), The Art of Brutalism: Rescuing Hope from Catastrophe in 1950s Britain, New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Hoggart, R. ([1958] 1973), The Uses of Literacy, Harmondsworth: Penguin.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Horowitz, D. (2012), Consuming Pleasures: Intellectuals and Popular Culture in the Postwar World, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvanian Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. ICA (1954a), ‘Tate Archives, Morland Collection of records relating to the history of the ICA, 955/1’, exhibition sub committee minutes, 21 May and 15 July.
  20. ICA (1954b), ‘Tate Archives, Morland Collection of records relating to the history of the ICA, 955/1’, Bulletin, October, p. 8.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Kennedy, D. (2024), Art & Class: How the Middle Classes Hijacked the Nation’s Galleries, Thirsk: Fisher King Publishing.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Kitnick, A. and Foster, H. (eds) (2011), October, Special Issue: ‘New Brutalism’, 136.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Lannoy, R. (2013), unpublished interview with D. Morland c.1974, with additional notes written by R. Lannoy to A. Massey, 19 April.
  24. Levcovitch, R. (2022), unpublished e-mail to A. Massey, 29 September.
  25. Lotery, K. (2020), The Long Front of Culture: The Independent Group and Exhibition Design, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Massey, A. (1995), The Independent Group: Modernism and Mass Culture in Postwar Britain 1945–58, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Massey, A. (2000), Hollywood beyond the Screen, Oxford: Berg.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Massey, A. (2013), Out of the Ivory Tower: The Independent Group and Popular Culture, Manchester: Manchester University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Massey, A. (2020), Dorothy Morland: Making ICA History, Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Massey, A. (2023), Tom Carr (1912–1977), Newmarket: British Sporting Art Trust.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Massey, A. and Muir, G. (2014), ICA 1946–68, London: ICA.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Massey, A. and Sparke, P. (1985), ‘The myth of the Independent Group’, BLOCK, 10, pp. 4856.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Massey, J. (2021), ‘Gwen Carr obituary’, The Guardian, 26 February, https://www.theguardian.com/culture/2021/feb/26/gwen-carr-obituary. Accessed 8 March 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Massouras, A. (2015), ‘The art of art students’, in N. Llewellyn and B. Williamson (eds), The London Arts Schools: Reforming the Art World, 1960 to Now, London: Tate, pp. 3748.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. McCaughey, P. (2006), Bert & Ned: The Correspondence of Albert Tucker and Sidney Nolan, Carlton: Miegunyah Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. McHale, E. (2022), e-mail to A. Massey, 2 October.
  37. McHale, J. (1958), ‘McHale statement’, 3 Collagists, exhibition catalogue, ICA, 4 November–1 December.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. McHale, J. Jr (2010), e-mail to A. Massey, 6 October.
  39. National Galleries of Scotland (2019), Collage: Cut and Paste: 400 Years of Collage, exhibition catalogue, Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art, Edinburgh, 29 June–27 October.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Paolozzi, E. (1994), Artists’ Lives interview with F. Whitford, British Library, C466/17/01-12.
  41. Potvin, J. and Marchand, M. (2020), Design & Agency, London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. [Google Scholar]
  43. Skeggs, B. (2011), ‘Feeling class: Affect and culture in the making of class relations’, in G. Ritzer (ed.), The Wiley-Blackwell Companion to Sociology, Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, pp. 26986, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1002/9781444347388.ch15.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Smithson, S. and Smithson, S. (2022), video call with A. Massey, 11 August.
  45. Staffordshire County Council (1949), letter from Director of Education to Ministry of Education, 26 September, Public Records Office, ED78/464.
  46. Thorpe, V. (2024), ‘Peter Capaldi says posh actors are smooth, confident and tedious: The Doctor Who and Thick of It actor laments the lack of support for emerging talent from working-class backgrounds’, The Observer, 14 January, https://theguardian.com/tv-and-radio/2024/jan/14/peter-capaldi-says-posh-actors-are-smooth-confident-and-tedious. Accessed 1 February 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Tickner, L. and Corbett, D. P. (eds) (2012), Art History, Special Issue: ‘British Art in the Cultural Field, 1939–69’, 35:2.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Turnbull, A. (2022), e-mail to A. Massey, 21 June.
  49. van den Heuvel, D. (2020), e-mail to A. Massey, 24 April.
  50. Walsh, V. (2001), Nigel Henderson: Parallel of Life and Art, London: Thames & Hudson.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Whiteley, N. (2002), Reyner Banham: Historian of the Immediate Future, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Banham, M. (2001), National Life Story Collection: Architects’ Lives, London: British Library.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Massey, A. (ed.) (2017), Pioneers of Pop, Newcastle: Hatton Gallery.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Massey, A. (2022), ‘Postwar modern: New art in Britain 1945–65’, Art Monthly, 456, pp. 3435.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Seago, A. (1995), Burning the Box of Beautiful Things: The Development of a Postmodern Sensibility, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Stratton, R. (2021), ‘John McHale, Marshall McLuhan, and the collage “Ikon”’, British Art Studies, 19, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.17658/issn.2058-5462/issue-19/rstratton.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Stratton, R. (2022), ‘John McHale’s participatory art: The Constructivist Kit’, Sculpture Journal, 31:2, pp. 17595, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.3828/sj.2022.31.2.04.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/jclc_00044_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/jclc_00044_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test