Skip to content
1981
image of Can you be unique by wearing fast fashion? Exploring South African contemporary female consumers’ creative behaviour towards fast fashion uniqueness

Abstract

Contemporary female consumers manage their appearance through current fashion trends and styles. The desire to be unique drives consumers to develop appearances that are perceived to differentiate them from others. In a world where fast fashion delivers multiple copies of one fashion item, it is difficult to imagine if fast fashion could deliver a unique appearance. Little research has considered the possibility of achieving fast fashion uniqueness. The behaviour of South African female consumers and their desire for fast fashion uniqueness as proposed in the theory of the need for uniqueness has also not been researched. The purpose of this study was to determine the meaning of fast fashion uniqueness and the behaviour related to the dimensions of uniqueness. An exploratory descriptive qualitative study was used to determine the fast fashion unique experiences of female fashion shoppers in South Africa. Thematic analysis of electronic individual interviews revealed the meaning of uniqueness manifested through mechanisms of self-expression and design creativity. Contribution to uniqueness theory is expressed through a socially acceptable appearance typified by creative choice counter-conformity behaviour. Unpopular choice counter-conformity behaviour was expressed through precautionary and guarding behaviour. Avoidance of similarity behaviour resulted in similarity acceptance behaviour characterized by helplessness and acceptance of fast fashion duplication, due to the inability to avoid similarity experienced during fast-fashion retail purchases. Coping strategies and avoidance behaviour tactics were applied to avoid fashion similarities. Fashion creativity serves as the mechanism through which contemporary fast fashion consumers achieve fast fashion appearance uniqueness. Fast fashion retailers in South Africa may need to improvise fashion offerings and give consumers alternative appearances to accommodate the creative uniqueness that female consumers are compelled to apply to achieve fast fashion uniqueness.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • The University of South Africa
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/fspc_00266_1
2024-07-08
2025-02-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Acocella, I. and Cataldi, S. (2021), Using Focus Groups: Theory, Methodology, Practice, Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arora, G. and Aggarwal, J. (2018), ‘Socio-psychological factors affecting clothing preferences: A review’, International Journal of Applied Home Sciences, 5:2, pp. 690706.
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Artac, B. Y. and Koc, F. (2017), ‘Using SEM (Structural Equation Modeling) to examine the effects of the body’s image on what women like and choose in clothing’, European Scientific Journal (ESJ), 13:8, pp. 114.
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barker, V. and Rodriquez, N. S. (2019), ‘This is who I am: The selfie as a personal and social identity marker’, International Journal of Communication, 13, pp. 114366.
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Belk, R. W. (1988), ‘Possessions and the “extended self”’, Journal of Consumer Research, 15:2, pp. 13968.
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Cakici, A. C. and Tekeli, S. (2020), ‘Consumers’ perceptions of visual product aesthetics based on fashion innovativeness and fashion leadership levels: A research study in Mersin’, Journal of Global Business Insights, 5:1, pp. 7386.
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Cavusoglu, L., Demirbag-Kaplan, M. and Izmir, E. C. (2019), ‘Self-presentation patterns and fashion consumption behavior: New insights for social media marketing’, Proceedings of the 2019 Global Fashion Management Conference, Paris, 11–14 July, pp. 83655, http://gfmcproceedings.net/html/sub3_01.html. Accessed 4 June 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Choukas-Bradley, S., Nesi, J., Widman, L. and Higgins, M. K. (2019), ‘Camera-ready: Young women’s appearance-related social media consciousness’, Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 8:4, pp. 47381.
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Chowdhury, T. A. and Akter, T. (2018), ‘Fashion attributes preferred by young Bangladeshi consumers while buying casual clothes: A multi-dimensional approach’, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 22:4, pp. 54056.
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Collett, M., Cluver, B. and Chen, H.-L. (2013), ‘Consumer perceptions the limited lifespan of fast fashion apparel’, Research Journal of Textile and Apparel, 17:2, pp. 6168.
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Damhorst, M. L. (1990), ‘In search of a common thread: Classification of information communicated through dress’, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 8:2, pp. 112.
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Das, M., Habib, M., Saha, V. and Jebarajakirthy, C. (2021), ‘Bandwagon vs snob luxuries: Targeting consumers based on uniqueness dominance’, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 61, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102582.
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Dayan, O. (2020), ‘The impact of need for uniqueness on word of mouth’, Journal of Global Marketing, 33:2, pp. 12538.
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Dermody, J., Koenig-Lewis, N., Zhao, A. L. and Hanmer-Lloyd, S. (2018), ‘Appraising the influence of pro-environmental self-identity on sustainable consumption buying and curtailment in emerging markets: Evidence from China and Poland’, Journal of Business Research, 86, pp. 33343.
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Dlodlo, N. (2014), ‘Uniqueness-seeking behavior and innovativeness of young consumers: Perspectives on South African fashion designer labels’, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5:15, pp. 19199.
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Etikan, I., Musa, S. A. and Alkassim, R. S. (2016), ‘Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling’, American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5:1, pp. 14.
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Feinberg, R. A., Mataro, L. and Burroughs, W. J. (1992), ‘Clothing and social identity’, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 11:1, pp. 1823.
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Fromkin, H. L. (1970), ‘Effects of experimentally aroused feelings of undistinctiveness upon valuation of scarce and novel experiences’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16:3, pp. 52129.
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Gabrielli, V., Bahi, I. and Codeluppi, V. (2013), ‘Consumption practices of fast fashion products: A consumer-based approach’, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 17:2, pp. 20624, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1108/jfmm-10-2011-0076.
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Guy, A. and Banim, M. (2000), ‘Personal collections: Women’s clothing use and identity’, Journal of Gender Studies, 9:3, pp. 31327.
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Hawes, T., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. and Campbell, S. M. (2020), ‘Unique associations of social media use and online appearance preoccupation with depression, anxiety, and appearance rejection sensitivity’, Body Image, 33, pp. 6676.
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N. and Marconi, V. C. (2017), ‘Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough?’, Qualitative Health Research, 27:4, pp. 591608.
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Hourigan, S. and Bougoure, U.-S. (2012), ‘Towards a better understanding of fashion clothing involvement’, Australasian Marketing Journal, 20:2, pp. 12735.
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Hustvedt, G. and Dickson, M. A. (2009), ‘Consumer likelihood of purchasing organic cotton apparel: Influence of attitudes and self-identity’, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 13:1, pp. 4965.
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Jager, J., Putnick, D. L. and Bornstein, M. H. (2017), ‘More than just convenient: The scientific merits of homogenous convenience samples’, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 82:2, pp. 1330.
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Japutra, A., Ekinic, Y. and Simkin, L. (2019), ‘Self-congruence, brand attachment and compulsive buying’, Journal of Business Research, 99, pp. 45663.
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Jarry, J. L., Dignar, N. A. L. and O’Driscoll, M. L. (2019), ‘Appearance investment: The construct that changed the field of body image’, Body Image, 31, pp. 22144.
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Johnson, T. W., Francis, S. K. and Burns, L. D. (2007), ‘Appearance management behavior and the five factor model of personality’, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 25:3, pp. 23043.
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Johnson, J. L., Adkins, D. and Chauvin, S. (2020), ‘Qualitative research in pharmacy education: A review of the quality indicators of rigor in qualitative research’, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 84:1, pp. 13846.
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Jordaan, Y. and Simpson, M. N. (2006), ‘Consumer innovativeness among females in specific fashion stores in the Menlyn shopping centre’, Journal of Consumer Sciences, 34:1, pp. 3240.
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Kasambala, J., Kempen, E., Labuschagne, J. and Lyon, P. (2019), ‘Uncovering the influence of personal values on the preference for certain casual clothing: Intrinsic product evaluative criteria’, The Retail and Marketing Review, 15:2, pp. 5164.
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Kim, H., Choo, H. J. and Yoon, N. (2013), ‘The motivational drivers of fast fashion avoidance’, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 17:2, pp. 24360.
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Kim, J., Park, J. and Glovinsky, P. L. (2018), ‘Customer involvement, fashion consciousness, and loyalty for fast-fashion retailers’, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 22:3, pp. 30116.
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Kodžoman, D. (2019), ‘The psychology of clothing: Meaning of colors, body image and gender expression in fashion’, Textile & Leather Review, 2:2, pp. 90103.
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Korstjens, K. and Moser, A. (2018), ‘Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research: Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing’, European Journal of General Practice, 24:1, pp. 12024.
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee, J. and Johnson, K. K. P. (2009), ‘Factors related to engagement in risky appearance management behavior’, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 27:3, pp. 16378.
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Matthews, D., Rothenberg, L. and Gopalakrishnan, S. (2019), ‘The impact of mass customization on fashion-innovative students: An assessment of need for uniqueness, self-identity, and perceived performance risk’, International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 12:3, pp. 293300.
    [Google Scholar]
  38. McNeill, L. S. (2018), ‘Fashion and women’s self-concept: A typology for self-fashioning using clothing’, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 22:1, pp. 8298.
    [Google Scholar]
  39. McNeill, L. and Moore, R. (2015), ‘Sustainable fashion consumption and the fast fashion conundrum: Fashionable consumers and attitudes to sustainability in clothing choice’, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39:3, pp. 21222.
    [Google Scholar]
  40. McNeill, L. and Venter, B. (2019), ‘Identity, self-concept and young women’s engagement with collaborative, sustainable fashion consumption model’, International Journal of Consumer Studies, 43:4, pp. 36878.
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Motale, M. D. B., Bevan-Dye, A. L. and De Klerk, N. (2014), ‘African generation Y male students’ fashion consciousness behavior’, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5:21, pp. 12128.
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Nail, P. R. (1986), ‘Toward an integration of some models and theories of social response’, Psychological Bulletin, 100:2, pp. 190206.
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Niinimäki, K. (2010), ‘Eco-clothing, consumer identity and ideology’, Sustainable Development, 18:3, pp. 15062.
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., Shite, D. E. and Moules, N. J. (2017), ‘Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria’, International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, pp. 113.
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Park, J. and Chun, J. (2020), ‘How does watching YouTube fashion content impact perception of appearance: A phenomenological study of Korean women in Generation Z’, Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 7:1, pp. 1–10.
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Park, H. J. and Lin, L. M. (2020), ‘Exploring attitude-behavior gap in sustainable consumption: Comparison of recycled and upcycled fashion products’, Journal of Business Research, 117, pp. 62328.
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Peluchette, J. V., Karl, K. and Fust, K. (2006), ‘Dressing to impress: Beliefs and attitudes regarding workplace attire’, Journal of Business and Psychology, 21:1, pp. 4563.
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Pervin, N. and Mokhtar, M. (2022), ‘The interpretivist research paradigm: A subjective notion of a social context’, International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11:2, pp. 41928.
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Pramestya, N. and Widagda, I. (2020), ‘The role of positive emotion mediates fashion involvement on impulse buying’, American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 4:9, pp. 18.
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Rahman, O. and Kharb, D. (2018), ‘Fashion innovativeness in India: Shopping behavior, clothing evaluation and fashion information sources’, International Journal of Fashion Design, Technology and Education, 11:3, pp. 28798.
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Rose, G. M., Shoham, A., Kahle, L. R. and Batra, R. (1994), ‘Social values, conformity, and dress’, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24:17, pp. 150119.
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Rudd, N. A. and Lennon, S. J., (2000), ‘Body image and appearance-management behaviors in college women’, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 18:3, pp. 15262.
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Sah, L. K., Singh, D. R. and Sah, R. K. (2020), ‘Conducting qualitative interviews using virtual communication tools amid COVID-19 pandemic: A learning opportunity for future research’, JNMA; Journal of the Nepal Medical Association, 58:232, pp. 110306.
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Sahin, S. and Mete, J. (2021), ‘A brief study on descriptive research: Its nature and application in social science’, International Journal of Research and Analysis in Humanities, 1:1, pp. 2333.
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Saldaña, J. (2016), The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers, London: SAGE.
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Sandelowski, M. (2004), ‘Using qualitative research’, Qualitative Health Research, 14:10, pp. 136686.
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Schumpe, B. M. and Erb, H.-P. (2015), ‘Humans and uniqueness’, Science Progress, 98:Pt 1, pp. 111.
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Scott, K. (2019), ‘These accessories will lift your mood and transform your outfit’, ABC News, 27 June, https://www.abc.net.au/everyday/how-to-use-accessories-to-transform-outfits/11177272. Accessed 16 January 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Seo, S. and Lang, C. (2019), ‘Psychological antecedents to customized apparel purchases’, Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 23:1, pp. 6681.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Shumaker, C., Loranger, D. and Dorie, A. (2017), ‘Dressing for the internet: A pilot study of self-presentation via dress on Instagram’, Fashion, Style & Popular Culture, 4:3, pp. 36582.
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Snyder, C. R. (1992), ‘Product scarcity by need of uniqueness interaction: A consumer Catch-22 carousel?’, Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 13:1, pp. 924.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Snyder, C. R. and Fromkin, H. L. (1977), ‘Abnormality as a positive characteristic: The development and validation of a scale measuring need for uniqueness’, Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 86:5, pp. 51827.
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Spaid, B. and Matthes, J. (2021), ‘Consumer collecting identity and behaviors: Underlying motivations and impact on life satisfaction’, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 38:5, pp. 55264.
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Su, J. and Chang, A. (2018), ‘Factors affecting college students’ brand loyalty toward fast fashion: A consumer-based brand equity approach’, International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 46:1, pp. 90107.
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Tajuddin, F. N. (2018), ‘Cultural and social identity in clothing matters “different cultures, different meanings”’, European Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 1:4, pp. 2125.
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Tian, K. T., Bearden, W. O. and Hunter, G. L. (2001), ‘Consumers’ need for uniqueness: Scale development and validation’, Journal of Consumer Research, 28:1, pp. 5066.
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Venter, M., Chinomona, R. and Chuchu, T. (2016), ‘Factors influencing fashion adoption among the youth in Johannesburg, South Africa’, Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, 8:4(J), pp. 92108.
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Workman, J. E. and Kidd, L. K. (2000), ‘Use of the need for uniqueness scale to characterize fashion consumer groups’, Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 18:4, pp. 22736.
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Yu, S., Hudders, L. and Cauberghe, V. (2018), ‘Are fashion consumers like schooling fish? The effectiveness of popularity cues in fashion e-commerce’, Journal of Business Research, 85, pp. 10516.
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Hawes, T. and Pariz, J. (2021), ‘A closer look at appearance and social media: Measuring activity, self-presentation, and social comparison and their associations with emotional adjustment’, Psychology of Popular Media, 10:1, pp. 7486.
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Zogaj, A., Olk, S. and Tscheulin, D. K. (2019), ‘Go pop-up: Effects of temporary retail on product- and brand-related consumer reactions’, Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 50, pp. 11121.
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/fspc_00266_1
Loading
/content/journals/10.1386/fspc_00266_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test