Embracing intersectional feminist thinking in design processes

References

1. Abdulla, D., Ansari, A., Canlı, E., Keshavarz, M., Kiem, M., Oliveira, P., Prado, L. and Schultz, T. (2019), ‘A manifesto for decolonising design’, Journal of Futures Studies, 23:3, pp. 129–32, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.6531/JFS.201903_23(3).0012.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Broadley, C. (2021), ‘Advancing asset-based practice: Engagement, ownership, and outcomes in participatory design’, The Design Journal, 24:2, pp. 253–75, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/14606925.2020.1857050.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Buolamwini, J. and Gebru, T. (2018), ‘Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification’, in S. A. Friedler and C. Wilson (eds), Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, New York, USA, 23–24 February, Brookline, MA: PMLR, pp. 1–15, https://dam-prod.media.mit.edu/x/2018/02/06/Gender Shades Intersectional Accuracy Disparities.pdf. Accessed 30 November 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Cachia, A. (2016), ‘The alterpodium: A performative design and disability intervention’, Design and Culture, 8:3, pp. 311–25, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/17547075.2016.1218709.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Canli, E. (2018), ‘Binary by design: Unfolding corporeal segregation at the intersection of gender, identity and materiality’, Design Journal, 21:5, pp. 651–69, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/14606925.2018.1491716.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Canli, E. and Martins, L. P. de O. (2016), ‘Design and intersectionality’, in Intersectional Perspectives on Design, Politics and Power, School of Arts and Communication, Malmö University, 14 and 15 November, pp. 1–6.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Carbado, D. W., Crenshaw, K. W., Mays, V. M. and Tomlinson, B. (2014), ‘Intersectionality: Mapping the movements of a theory’, Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10:2, pp. 303–12, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1017/S1742058X13000349.
   [Google Scholar]
8. Cho, S. (2013), ‘The curious reception of intersectionality’, Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 10:2, pp. 385–404.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Collins, P. H. (1990), ‘Black feminist thought in the matrix of domination reconceptualizing race, class, and gender as interlocking systems of oppression’, Hyman, http://www.runet.edu/~lridener/courses/BLKFEM.HTML. Accessed 4 April 2021.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Collins, P. H. (2000), Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment, New York: Routledge, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.4324/9780203900055.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Collins, P. H. (2015), ‘Intersectionality’s definitional dilemmas’, Annual Review of Sociology, 41:1, pp. 1–20, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112142.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Collins, P. H. and Bilge, S. (2020), Intersectionality, 2nd ed., Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Costanza-Chock, S. (2020), Design Justice: Community-Led Practices to Build the Worlds We Need, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Crenshaw, K. (1989), ‘Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics’, University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989:1, pp. 271–82, https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol1989/iss1/8. Accessed 18 February 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Criado-Perez, C. (2019), Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men, New York: Abrams Press.
    [Google Scholar]
16. D’Ignazio, C. and Klein, L. F. (2020), Data Feminism, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Decolonising Design Group (2017), ‘Decolonising design: Editorial statement’, 15 November, http://www.decolonisingdesign.com/statements/2016/editorial/. Accessed 22 October 2021.
18. Dhamoon, R. (2015), ‘A feminist approach to decolonizing anti-racism: Rethinking transnationalism, intersectionality, and settler colonialism’, Feral Feminisms, 4, pp. 20–37.
    [Google Scholar]
19. Escobar, A. (2018), Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.7551/mitpress/9370.003.0012.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Escobar-Tello, M. C., Ruette-Orihuela, K., Gough, K. V., Fayad-Sierra, J. A. and Velez-Torres, I. (2021), ‘Decolonising design in peacebuilding contexts’, Design Studies, 73, pp. 1–24, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1016/J.DESTUD.2021.101001.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Goodwill, M., van der Bijl-Brouwer, M. and Bendor, R. (2021), ‘Beyond good intentions: Towards a power literacy framework for service designers’, International Journal of Design, 15:3, pp. 45–59.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Grewal, I. (1999), ‘“Women’s rights as human rights”: Feminist practices, global feminism, and human rights regimes in transnationality’, Citizenship Studies, 3:3, pp. 337–54, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/13621029908420719.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Guittar, S. G. and Guittar, N. A. (2015), ‘Intersectionality’, in J. D. Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed., Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 657–62, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.32202-4.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Hall, L. K. (2008), ‘Strategies of erasure: U.S. colonialism and native Hawaiian feminism’, American Quarterly, 60:2, pp. 273–80.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Hamraie, A. (2016), ‘Universal design and the problem of “post-disability” ideology’, Design and Culture, 8:3, pp. 285–309, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/17547075.2016.1218714.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Hurtado, A. (2019), ‘Intersectionality’, in R. T. Goodman (ed.), The Bloomsbury Handbook of 21st-Century Feminist Theory, London: Bloomsbury Publishing, pp. 159–70, http://marefateadyan.nashriyat.ir/node/150. Accessed 19 April 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
27. King, D. (1988), ‘Multiple jeopardy, multiple consciousness: The context of a Black feminist ideology’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14:1, pp. 42–72.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Lorde, A. (1984), Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches, New York: Crossing Press.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Mareis, C. and Paim, N. (eds) (2021), Design Struggles: Intersecting Histories, Pedagogies, and Perspectives, Amsterdam: Valiz.
    [Google Scholar]
30. McCall, L. (2005), ‘The complexity of intersectionality’, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 30:3, pp. 1771–800, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1086/426800.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Mohanty, C. T. (1988), ‘Under western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses’, Feminist Review, 10:30, pp. 61–88, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2090/stable/1395054. Accessed 12 July 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Onafuwa, D. (2018), ‘Allies and decoloniality: A review of the intersectional perspectives on design, politics, and power symposium’, Design and Culture, 10:1, pp. 7–15, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/17547075.2018.1430995.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Persson, H., Åhman, H., Yngling, A. A. and Gulliksen, J. (2015), ‘Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: Different concepts – one goal? On the concept of accessibility – historical, methodological and philosophical aspects’, Universal Access in the Information Society, 14:4, pp. 505–26, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1007/s10209-014-0358-z.
    [Google Scholar]
34. Phoenix, A. (2006), ‘Intersectionality’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13:3, pp. 187–92, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1177/1350506806065751.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Rodriguez Schon, V. and Celi, M. (2023), ‘Pursuing positionality in design’, in IASDR 2023: Life-Changing Design, Milan, Italy, 9–13 October, London: Design Research Society, pp. 1–15, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.21606/IASDR.2023.371.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Romero, M. (2018), Introducing Intersectionality, Cambridge: Polity Press.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Rosner, D. (2018), Critical Fabulations, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.7551/mitpress/11035.003.0006.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Rosner, D., Taylor, A. and Wiberg, M. (2020), ‘Feminisms in design’, Interactions, 27:6, 5 pp. 30–49, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1145/3430590.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Rottenberg, C. (2014), ‘The rise of neoliberal feminism’, Cultural Studies, 28:3, pp. 418–37, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/09502386.2013.857361.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Ruiz, A. M, Luebke, J., Klein, K., Moore, K., Gonzalez, M., Dressel, A. and Mkandawire-Valhmu, L. (2021), ‘An integrative literature review and critical reflection of intersectionality theory’, Nursing Inquiry, 28:4, pp. 1–11, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1111/nin.12414.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Scott, J. W. (1986), ‘Gender: A useful category of historical analysis’, The American Historical Review, 91:5, pp. 1053–75, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2090/stable/1864376. Accessed 2 July 2021.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Shaw, J. (2019a), ‘Designing with intentional intersectionality’, Vimeo, 10 August, https://vimeo.com/353133100. Accessed 1 May 2022.
    [Google Scholar]
43. Shaw, J. (2019b), ‘Towards an intersectional praxis in design’, master’s research project, Toronto: OCAD University.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Simonsen, J. and Robertson, T. (2012), Routledge International Handbook of Participatory Design, New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Smith, K. (2013), ‘Why accessibility alone isn’t enough’, in K. Smith (ed.), Digital Outcasts, Waltham, MA: Morgan Kaufmann, pp. 51–67, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1016/B978-0-12-404705-1.00003-0.
    [Google Scholar]
46. St. Denis, V. (2007), ‘Feminism is for everybody: Aboriginal women, feminism, and diversity’, in J. Green (ed.) Making Space for Indigenous Feminism, Halifax: Fernwood Press, pp. 32–52.
    [Google Scholar]
47. Torraco, R. J. (2005), ‘Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples’, Human Resource Development Review, 4:3, pp. 356–67, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1177/1534484305278283.
    [Google Scholar]
48. Valentine, D. (2007), Imagining Transgender: An Ethnography of a Category, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
49. Williams, L. (2019), ‘The co-constitutive nature of neoliberalism, design, and racism’, Design and Culture, 11:3, pp. 301–21, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/17547075.2019.1656901.
    [Google Scholar]
50. Wohlin, C. (2014), ‘Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering’, in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE ’14), London, UK, 13–14 May, New York: ACM, pp. 1–10, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1145/2601248.2601268.
    [Google Scholar]
51. Yuval-Davis, N. (2006), ‘Intersectionality and feminist politics’, European Journal of Women’s Studies, 13:3, pp. 193–209, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1177/1350506806065752.
    [Google Scholar]