Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Journal of Design, Business & Society
  4. Volume 10, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 10, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2055-2106
  • E-ISSN: 2055-2114

Abstract

: Designed artefacts intended for users and markets serve primarily functional and pragmatic uses, yet there are other forms of designed artefacts whose purpose for being is to present concepts, inspire thought and provoke action. Their existence is not utilitarian but one of speculation. In this article, we draw attention to how materials, technologies and ideas are brought together in speculative forms of editorial design that confront the existential crisis of our times – the climate emergency. In doing so, we aim to catalyse future work on hybrid print-digital books and design for activism. : Through a critical reflection of the process of designing, developing and publicly exhibiting an interactive book-of-the-future centred on a contemporary environmental issue, we interrogate the design of multimodal, polyvocal artefacts and their place in public and academic discourse. We briefly explain the origins and motivations of the project to create , analyse the design and production process and critically review both the physical book design and the digital texts within (films, poetry, art, performances and writing). : Manifest as a printed-digital speculative artefact, is a diegetic prototype of the book-of-the-future, a knowledge-building artefact through and a discursive design that stimulates thought and action. Temporally and conceptually, it shifts its mode of existence from an ambiguous project towards a generative design and – eventually – a design for activism. The collaborative design of discursive artefacts can play a part in shaping public understanding and discourse on critical issues. Such artefacts facilitate new social connections, provoke individual action and serve as catalysts for social and technological innovation. : Functionalist or utilitarian forms of design – products, processes, services and built environments – are prevalent in everyday life, yet these do little to advance our thinking about possible, desirable or alternative futures. By contrast, multimodal, polyvocal activist designs afford designers and users/readers/publics the opportunity to interrogate contemporary (and persistent) issues of human concern in imaginative ways and provoke positive action in response. : Our ‘book-of-the-future’ draws attention to the possibility of hybrid print-digital publications as lean-back/stand-back and lean-forward/step-forward discursive and activist devices in either public or private spaces, as alternatives to agonistic street demonstration or direct action and as exemplars of aesthetic, activist energy humanities.

Funding
This study was supported by the:
  • Curtin University
© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00059_1
2024-10-11
2025-04-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Albuquerque, Paula and Magda, Pischetola (2024), ‘Affect as future-making pedagogy: A post-qualitative inquiry in Brazilian primary schools’, Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 32:2, pp. 433–51, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/14681366.2022.2046142.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Bairaktaris, Georgios, Siderov, Hristo, Celebiler, Deniz, Kolii, Corinne, Frohlich, David M. and Sporea, Radu A. (2021), ‘Magic bookmark: A nonintrusive electronic system for functionalizing physical books’, Advanced Intelligent Systems, 4:3, p. 2100138, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1002/aisy.202100138.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Ball & Doggett (2022), ‘Sovereign offset digital: Indigo’, Ballanddoggett.Com, https://ballanddoggett.com.au/product/sovereign-offset-digital-indigo/. Accessed 30 July 2024.
  4. Bambra Press (2022), ‘Bookbinding’, Bambra.Com.Au, https://bambra.com.au/services/bookbinding/. Accessed 30 July 2024.
  5. Bardzell, Shaowen, Bardzell, Jeffrey, Forlizzi, Jodi, Zimmerman, John and Antanitis, John (2012), ‘Critical design and critical theory: The challenge of designing for provocation’, in DIS 2012 (ACM SIGCHI Designing Interactive Systems), Newcastle, UK, 11–15 June, ACM: New York, pp. 288–97.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bieling, Tom (2019), ‘Designing activism: An introduction’, in T. Bieling (ed.), Design (&) Activism: Perspectives on Design as Activism and Activism as Design, Milan: Mimesis International.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bould, Mark (2021), The Anthropocene Unconscious: Climate Catastrophe Culture, London and Brooklyn, NY: Verso Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Brand, Stewart (ed.) (1968), Whole Earth Catalog: Access to Tools, Fall 1968, Menlo Park, CA: Portola Institute.
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Brand, Stewart (1988), The Media Lab: Inventing the Future at MIT, London: Penguin Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Buchanan, Richard (2001), ‘Design and the new rhetoric: Productive arts in the philosophy of culture’, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 34:3, pp. 183–206, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1353/par.2001.0012.
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Buchanan, Richard (2019), ‘Surroundings and environments in fourth order design’, Design Issues, 35:1, pp. 4–22, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1162/desi_a_00517.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Buckminster-Fuller, Richard (1972), The Buckminster Fuller Reader (ed. J. Meller), London: Pelican Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Burian, Veronika and Scaglione, José (2012), ‘Tablet Gothic’, https://www.type-together.com/tablet-gothic-font. Accessed 30 July 2024.
  14. Caldwell, Cath and Zappaterra, Yolanda (2014), Editorial Design: Digital and Print, London: Laurence King Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Canada Type (2022), ‘Orpheus Pro’, https://www.canadatype.com/product/orpheus-pro/. Accessed 30 July 2024.
  16. Candy, Stuart and Potter, Cher (2019), ‘Introduction to the Special Issue: Design and Futures (vol. I)’, Journal of Futures Studies, 23:3, pp. 1–2, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.6531/JFS.201903_23(3).0001.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Cook, Peter and Archigram Group (1973), Archigram, New York: Praeger Publishers.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Corrigan-Kavanagh, Emily, Frohlich, David, Yuan, Haiyue and Bober, Miroslaw (2020), ‘Designing for the next generation of augmented books’, Journal of Design Research, 18:6, pp. 356–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Crawford, Kate and Joler, Vladan (2018), ‘Anatomy of an AI system: The Amazon echo as an anatomical map of labor, data and planetary resources’, AI Now Institute and Share Lab, https://anatomyof.ai/. Accessed 30 July 2024.
  20. Cross, Nigel (2006), Designerly Ways of Knowing, London: Springer-Verlag.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Cunningham, Tom (2022), ‘Grange’, Tropicaltype.Com, https://tropicaltype.com/products/grange-1. Accessed 30 July 2024.
  22. Dalsgaard, Peter (2014), ‘Pragmatism and design thinking’, International Journal of Design, 8:1, pp. 143–55.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. DiSalvo, Carl (2012), Adversarial Design, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Dixon, Brian S. (2020), Dewey and Design: A Pragmatist Perspective for Design Research, Cham: Springer International Publishing AG.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Dorst, Kees (2011), ‘The core of “design thinking” and its application’, Design Studies, 32:6, pp. 521–32, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1016/j.destud.2011.07.006.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Drucker, Johanna (2001), ‘Digital ontologies: The ideality of form in/and code storage – or – can graphesis challenge mathesis?’, Leonardo, 34:2, pp. 141–45, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1162/002409401750184708.
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Drucker, Johanna (2014), Graphesis: Visual Forms of Knowledge Production, Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Drucker, Johanna and Auslander, Philip (2002), ‘Lexicon (5)’, Performance Research, 7:1, pp. 101–02, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/13528165.2002.10871836.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Dunne, Anthony and Raby, Fiona (2001), Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects, London: Birkhauser Verlag AG.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Dunne, Anthony and Raby, Fiona (2013), Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Edelmann, Klaus Thomas, Erlhoff, Michael, Grand, Simon, Jonas, Wolfgang, Michael, Ralf and Schneider, Beat (2007), Design Research Now: Essays and Selected Projects (ed. R. Michel), Basel, Boston, MA and Berlin: Birkhäuser.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Ehses, Hanno (2008), ‘Design on a rhetorical footing’, design papers 6, Halifax: NSCAD University.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Ely, Philip and Geneste, Louis (2020), ‘Spinning in helices: Design and the question of value’, Design Management Journal, 15:1, pp. 1–14, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1111/dmj.12059.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Ely, Philip, Frohlich, David, Bairaktaris, George, Yuan, Haiyue and Sporea, Radu (2022), The Climate Domesday Book, Perth: Curtin University, http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11937/88792.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Evans, Mel (2015), ‘Discrete logos, big spills’, in Big Oil and the Arts, London: Pluto Press, pp. 69–102.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Frohlich, David M., Ely, Philip, Moore, Helen, Golsteijn, Connie, Egglestone, Paul, Mills, John, Rogers, Jon, Metcalf, Tom, Stone, Kate and Menicou, Maria (2017), ‘Designing interactive newsprint’, International Journal of Human–Computer Studies, 104, February, pp. 36–49, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.03.002.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Kang, Qi, Lu, Jinyi and Xu, Jianhua (2021), ‘Is e-reading environmentally more sustainable than conventional reading? Evidence from a systematic literature review’, Library and Information Science Research, 43:3, pp. 101105–05, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1016/j.lisr.2021.101105.
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Kaufer, David S. and Butler, Brian S. (1996), ‘Rhetoric and the arts of design’, in Rhetoric and the Arts of Design, Routledge, p. 302.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Kirk, Andrew (2001), ‘Appropriating technology: The Whole Earth Catalog and counterculture environmental politics’, Environmental History, 6, pp. 374–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Koskinen, Ilpo, Zimmerman, John, Binder, Thomas, Redström, John and Wensveen, Stephan (2012), Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom, Waltham, MA: Elsevier Inc.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Krippendorff, Klaus (2005), The Semantic Turn: A New Foundation for Design, Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press LLC.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Latour, Bruno (1992), Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts (eds W. Bijker and J. Law), Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 225–58.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Latour, Bruno (2005), Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor–Network–Theory, Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Latour, Bruno (2013), An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns (ed./trans. C. Porter), Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Levine, Caroline (2007), Provoking Democracy: Why We Need the Arts, Malden, MA, Oxford and Carlton: Blackwell Publishing.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Levine, Caroline (2023), The Activist Humanist: Form and Method in the Climate Crisis, Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. MacKenzie, D. and Wajcman, J. (1999), The Social Shaping of Technology: How the Refrigerator Got Its Hum, 2nd ed., Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Majoor, Martin (2004), ‘FF nexus’, https://www.martinmajoor.com/4_nexus.html. Accessed 30 July 2024.
  49. Majoor, Martin and Buivenga, Jos (2014), ‘The Questa Project’, Thequestaproject.Com, http://www.thequestaproject.com/about.html. Accessed 30 July 2024.
  50. Malm, Andreas (2020), Corona, Climate, Chronic Emergency, London and New York: Verso Books.
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Malm, Andreas (2021), How to Blow up a Pipeline: Learning to Fight in a World on Fire, London and New York: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Malm, Andreas and Zetkin Collective (2021), White Skin, Black Fuel: On the Danger of Fossil Fascism, international version, London: Verso.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Malpass, Matt (2017), Critical Design in Context, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Markussen, Thomas (2013), ‘The disruptive aesthetics of design activism: Enacting design between art and politics’, Design Issues, 29:1, pp. 38–50.
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Markussen, Thomas (2019), ‘The impure politics of design activism’, in T. Bieling (ed.), Design (&) Activism: Perspectives on Design as Activism and Activism as Design, Milan: Mimesis International.
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Martin, Craig (2022), Deviant Design: The Ad Hoc, the Illicit, the Controversial, London: Bloomsbury Visual Arts.
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Massumi, Brian (2011), ‘Introduction: Activist philosophy and the occurrent arts’, in Semblance and Event: Activist Philosophy and the Occurrent Arts, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 1–28.
     [Google Scholar]
  58. McLuhan, Marshall (1970), Counterblast, London: Rapp & Whiting Limited.
     [Google Scholar]
  59. McLuhan, Marshall, Fiore, Quentin and Agel, Jerome ([1968] 1997), War and Peace in the Global Village, 2nd ed., San Francisco, CA: HardWired.
     [Google Scholar]
  60. McLuhan, Marshall, Fiore, Quentin and Agel, Jerome ([1967] 2008), The Medium Is the Massage, London: Penguin Group.
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Parrish, Jess (2022), e-mail to Philip Ely, 28 November.
  62. Robertson, Rachel, Bender, Stuart, Broderick, Mick, Castleden, Susanna, Messham-Muir, Kit, Chrulew, Matthew, Dooley, Kath, Ely, Philip, Frohlich, David, Johnston, Michelle, Goldrick, Sally, Kerr, Thor, Grenfell, Raymond, Rahaman, Hafizur, Boyle, Maureen and Eames, Richard (2022), Energaia: Imagining Energy Futures, Perth: School of Media, Creative Arts & Social Inquiry, Curtin University.
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Schmid, Jimmy (2024), ‘LinkedIn post’, LinkedIn post, 12 June, https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jimmy-schmid_my-ninth-and-last-stop-on-my-uk-networking-activity-7206276304977948672-4S-Y?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_desktop. Accessed 30 July 2024.
  64. Sharma, Astha and Beck, Fiona J. (2021), ‘Quantifying and comparing fundamental loss mechanisms to enable solar-to-hydrogen conversion efficiencies above 20% using perovskite–silicon tandem absorbers’, Advanced Energy and Sustainability Research, 2:1, p. 2000039, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1002/aesr.202000039.
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Sless, David (2018), ‘Designing documents for people to use’, She Ji: The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 4:2, pp. 125–42, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1016/j.sheji.2018.05.004.
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Sless, David and Shrensky, Ruth (1995), ‘The boundary of communication’, Australian Journal of Communication, 22:2, pp. 31–47.
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Tharp, Bruce M. and Tharp, Stephanie M. (2018), Discursive Design: Critical, Speculative, and Alternative Things, Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Thoreau, Henry David (1854), Walden, or Life in the Woods, 1st ed., Boston, MA: Ticknor & Fields.
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Thorpe, Ann (2014), ‘Defining design as activism’, unpublished submission to Journal of Architectural Education.
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Tonkinwise, Cameron (2015), ‘Just design’, Medium, 21 August, https://medium.com/@camerontw/just-design-b1f97cb3996f. Accessed 30 July 2024.
  71. Wang, Yuan, Sharma, Astha, Duong, The, Arandiyan, Hamidreza, Zhao, Tingwen, Zhang, Doudou, Su, Zhen, Garbrecht, Magnus, Beck, Fiona J., Karuturi, Siva, Zhao, Chuan and Catchpole, Kylie (2021), ‘Direct solar hydrogen generation at 20% efficiency using low-cost materials’, Advanced Energy Materials, 11:34, pp. 1–11, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1002/aenm.202101053.
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Williams, Sarah (2020), Data Action: Using Data for Public Good, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Woodhouse, Edward and Patton, Jason W. (2004), ‘Design by society: Science and technology studies and the social shaping of design’, Design Issues, 20:2, pp. 1–12.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00059_1
Loading
No end in sight: The Climate Domesday Book as an exemplar of discursive and activist design
Journal of Design, Business & Society 10, 61 (2024); https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1386/dbs_00059_1
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00059_1
/content/journals/10.1386/dbs_00059_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): aesthetic humanities; books; climate; design activism; futures; interaction design

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test