Skip to content
1981
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies
  4. Volume 16, Issue 2
  5. Article
Disinformation, Fact-Checking and Civic Responsibility
  • ISSN: 1757-1898
  • E-ISSN: 1757-1901

Abstract

This study focuses on debunking social media hoaxes as a critical issue for both fact checkers and democracies, as it is partially linked to the international and geopolitical scope of disinformation. The objective is to compare the debunking practices of seven fact-checking agencies from United Kingdom, France and Spain classified by its international, national or regional scope: Les Observateurs (France), Logically (United Kingdom), Les Vérificateurs (France), Full Fact (United Kingdom), Newtral (Spain), Ferret Fact (United Kingdom) and Verificat (Spain). Explorative, descriptive and inferential statistical quantitative research based on the analysis of content over eight hundred posts between July and August 2023 was conducted. The results partly confirm the objective of debunking as preventing the spread of a story, since the public health approach based on verification (labelling as ‘false’ rather offering in-depth explanation) is the prevailing trend, irrespective of the section. Nevertheless, the public health or public reason approach depends on the agency, as some agencies – including the two French – provide more detailed explanations with clear public reason approach, even in the treatment of international conflicts. Results also show significant homogeneity in terms of the major issues covered (inclusion and migration, environment, health and science, international conflicts, etc.), although the relative weight of each section varies significantly in each agency, including those of the same scope.

© 2024 Intellect Ltd
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00112_1
2024-12-10
2025-03-16
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

References

  1. Amazeen, M. A. (2020), ‘Journalistic interventions: The structural factors affecting the global emergence of fact-checking’, Journalism, 21:1, pp. 95–111.
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Amorós García, M. (2018), Fake News: La verdad de las noticias falsas, Barcelona: Plataforma actual.
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Aruguete, N., Bachmann, I., Calvo, E., Valenzuela, S. and Ventura, T. (2023), ‘Truth be told: How “true” and “false” labels influence user engagement with fact-checks’, New Media & Society, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1177/14614448231193709.
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Birks, J. (2019), Fact-Checking Journalism and Political Argumentation: A British Perspective, Cham: Springer Nature.
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Budak, C., Agrawal, D. and El Abbadi, A. (2011), ‘Limiting the spread of misinformation in social networks’, in Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, Hyderabad, India, 28 March–1 April, pp. 665–74.
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Diep, P. P. U. (2022), ‘Check the checks: A comparison of fact-checking practices between newspapers and independent organizations in the United States’, Ph.D. thesis, Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, https://hdl.handle.net/2097/42213. Accessed 12 August 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Dobbs, M. (2012), The Rise of Political Fact-Checking: How Reagan Inspired a Journalistic Movement: A Reporter’s Eye View, Washington, DC and Sacramento, CA: New America Foundation.
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Edelman Trust Barometer (2012), ‘Edelman trust barometer: Executive summary’, 23 January, https://www.edelman.com/trust/2012-trust-barometer. Accessed 8 January 2024.
  9. European Union External Action (2024), ‘Tackling disinformation, foreign information manipulation & interference’, 27 May, https://www.eeas.europa.eu/eeas/tackling-disinformation-foreign-information-manipulation-interference_en. Accessed 27 June 2024.
  10. Eurostat (n.d.), ‘Population and demography’, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/population-demography/demography-population-stock-balance/database. Accessed 27 June 2024.
  11. Fallis, D. (2009), ‘A conceptual analysis of disinformation’, in iConference 2009, University of Illinois, Champaign, IL, USA, https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/items/15210. Accessed 21 November 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Fletcher, R., Cornia, A., Graves, L. and Nielsen, R. K. (2018), Measuring the Reach of ‘Fake News’ and Online Disinformation in Europe, Oxford: Reuters Institute and University of Oxford.
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Fox, C. J. (1983), Information and Misinformation, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao, J., Hoffmann, H. F., Oikonomou, S., Kiskovski, D. and Bandhakavi, A. (2021), ‘Logically at Factify 2022: Multimodal fact verification’, Preprint, arXiv, pp. 1–22, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.48550/arXiv.2112.09253.
  15. García-Marín, D., Rubio-Jordán, A. V. and Salvat-Martinrey, G. (2023), ‘Chequeando al fact-checker. Prácticas de verificación política y sesgos partidistas en Newtral (España)’, Revista de Comunicación, 22:2, pp. 207–23, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.26441/RC22.2-2023-3184.
     [Google Scholar]
  16. García-Marín, D. and Salvat-Martinrey, G. (2023), ‘Desinformación y guerra. Verificación de las imágenes falsas sobre el conflicto ruso-ucraniano’, ICONO 14: Revista científica de Comunicación y Tecnologías emergentes, 21:1, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.7195/ri14.v21i1.1943.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Gisondi, M. A., Barber, R., Faust, J. S., Raja, A., Strehlow, M. C., Westafer, L. M. and Gottlieb, M. (2022), ‘A deadly infodemic: Social media and the power of COVID-19 misinformation’, Journal of Medical Internet Research, 24:2, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.2196/35552.
     [Google Scholar]
  18. González, J. I. N., Cabrero, M. B. and García, E. G. (2017), ‘Opinión pública e infoxicación en las redes: Los fundamentos de la post-verdad’, Vivat Academia, 139, pp. 83–94.
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Graves, L., Bélair-Gagnon, V. and Larsen, R. (2023), ‘From public reason to public health: Professional implications of the “debunking turn” in the global fact-checking field’, Digital Journalism, pp. 1–20, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1080/21670811.2023.2218454.
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Graves, L. and Cherubini, F. (2016), The Rise of Fact-Checking Sites in Europe: Digital News Project Report, Oxford: Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and University of Oxford, https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/our-research/rise-fact-checking-sites-europe. Accessed 12 August 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Hardalov, M., Koychev, I. and Nakov, P. (2016), ‘In search of credible news’, in 17th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence: Methodology, Systems, and Applications (AIMSA) 2016, Varna, Bulgaria, 7–10 September, Berlin: Springer International Publishing, pp. 172–80.
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Hidalgo-Cobo, P., López-Marcos, C. and Puebla, B. (2023), ‘International scope of European fact-checkers: Case study of Spain, France and the UK’, in D. Catalán-Matamoros (ed.), Disinformation and Fact-Checking in Contemporary Society, Madrid: Dykinson, pp. 361–79, https://hdl.handle.net/10115/29689. Accessed 30 October 2023.
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Hidalgo-Cobo, P. and Puebla, B. (2023), ‘Desinformación y conceptos análogos: Uso terminológico de las agencias de verificación españolas’, in T. Hidalgo-Marí and J. Herrero-Gutiérrez (coords), Nuevas pesquisas: Los rumbos de la investigación en comunicación, Madrid: Dykinson, pp. 95–104.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Humprecht, E., Esser, F., Aelst, P. V., Staender, A. and Morosoli, S. (2023), ‘The sharing of disinformation in cross-national comparison: Analyzing patterns of resilience’, Information, Communication & Society, 26:7, pp. 1342–62.
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Jang, J. W., Lee, E. J. and Shin, S. Y. (2019), ‘What debunking of misinformation does and doesn’t’, Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 22:6, pp. 423–27.
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Lee, N., Bang, Y., Madotto, A. and Fung, P. (2020), ‘Misinformation has high perplexity’, Preprint, arXiv, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.48550/arXiv.2006.04666.
  27. Lee, S., Xiong, A., Seo, H. and Lee, D. (2023), ‘“Fact-checking” fact checkers: A data-driven approach’, Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, 4:5, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.37016/mr-2020-126.
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Leka, J. and Furnham, A. (2023), ‘Climate change denial: Causes, consequences, and cure’, in A. Di Fabio and C. L. Cooper (eds), Psychology of Sustainability and Sustainable Development in Organizations, Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 42–56.
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Lim, C. (2018), ‘Checking how fact-checkers check’, Research & Politics, 5:3, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1177/2053168018786848.
     [Google Scholar]
  30. López-Marcos, C. and Vicente-Fernández, P. (2021), ‘Fact Checkers facing fake news and disinformation in the digital age: A comparative analysis between Spain and United Kingdom’, Publications, 9:3, pp. 31–36.
     [Google Scholar]
  31. López-Pan, F. and Rodríguez-Rodríguez, J. M. (2020), ‘El fact checking en España. Plataformas, practices y rasgos distintivos’, Estudios sobre el mensaje periodístico, 26:3, pp. 1045–65, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.5209/esmp.65246.
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Mantzarlis, A. (2018), ‘Fact-checking 101’, in C. Ireton and J. Posetti (eds), Journalism, Fake News and Disinformation: Handbook for Journalism Education and Training, Paris: UNESCO, pp. 85–100, https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000265552. Accessed 12 August 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Markowitz, D. M., Levine, T. R., Serota, K. B. and Moore, A. D. (2023), ‘Cross-checking journalistic fact-checkers: The role of sampling and scaling in interpreting false and misleading statements’, PLoS ONE, 18:7, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1371/journal.pone.0289004.
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Mayoral, J., Parratt, S. and Morata, M. (2019), ‘Desinformación, manipulación y credibilidad periodística: Una perspectiva histórica’, Historia y comunicación social, 24:2, pp. 395–409, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.5209/hics.66267.
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Moreno-Gil, V., Ramon Vegas, X. and Rodríguez Martínez, R. (2021), ‘Fact-checking interventions as counteroffensives to disinformation growth: Standards, values, and practices in Latin America and Spain’, Media and Communication, 9:1, pp. 251–63.
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Moreno-Gil, V., Ramon-Vegas, X. and Mauri-Ríos, M. (2022), ‘Bringing journalism back to its roots: Examining fact-checking practices, methods, and challenges in the Mediterranean context’, El Profesional de la Información, 31:2, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.3145/epi.2022.mar.15.
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Mosinzova, V., Fabian, B., Ermakova, T. and Baumann, A. (2019), ‘Fake news, conspiracies and myth debunking in social media: A literature survey across disciplines’, SSRN, 3 February, http://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2168/10.2139/ssrn.3328022.
  38. Nicey, J. (2022), ‘Fact-checking in France: Journalism’s rapid response to the digital transformations of the 2000s and 2010s’, Les Enjeux de linformation et de la communication, 231:1, pp. 67–79.
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Nicey, J. and Bigot, L. (2020), ‘Le soutien de Google et de Facebook au fact-checking français: Entre transparence et dépendance’, Sur le journalisme, About journalism, Sobre jornalismo, 9:1, pp. 58–73.
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Pinilla-Gómez, R. (2023), ‘Análisis del discurso, poder y guerra de informaciones: El lenguaje y la comunicación en la invasión rusa de Ucrania’, in El discurso como herramienta de control social, Berlin: Peter Lang, pp. 303–17.
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Porter, E., Velez, Y. and Wood, T. J. (2023), ‘Correcting COVID-19 vaccine misinformation in 10 countries’, Royal Society Open Science, 10:3, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1098/rsos.221097.
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Rieger, J., Hornig, N., Flossdorf, J., Müller, H., Mündges, S., Jentsch, C., Rahnenführer, J. and Elmer, C. (2023), ‘Debunking disinformation with GADMO: A topic modeling analysis of a comprehensive corpus of German-language fact-checks’, in Proceedings of the 4th Conference on Language, Data and Knowledge, Vienna, Austria, September, Lisbon: NOVA CLUNL, pp. 520–31, https://aclanthology.org/2023.ldk-1.56. Accessed 12 August 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Rodríguez Martínez, R., Mauri, M., Chaparro, M., Egaña, T., Fanals Gubau, L., Herrera, S., Morata, M., Moreno-Gil, V., Luengo, M., Palà, G., Pérez Pereiro, M., Requejo Alemán, J. L., Rojas Torrijos, J. L., Salgado, F., Suárez, P., Tulloch, C. and Zuberogoitia, A. (2021), Desinformación y plataformas de factchecking: Estado de la cuestión, Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Ruiz, M. J. U., Anzera, G. and Verdú, F. J. M. (2020), ‘Plataformas independientes de fact-checking en España e Italia: Características, organización y método’, Revista Mediterránea de Comunicación: Mediterranean Journal of Communication, 11:2, pp. 23–39.
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Sánchez, A. N. (2021), ‘Desinformación y Covid-19: Análisis cuantitativo a través de los bulos desmentidos en Latinoamérica y España’, Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 27:3, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.5209/esmp.72874.
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Spivak, C. (2010), ‘The fact-checking explosion: In a bitter political landscape marked by rampant allegations of questionable credibility, more and more news outlets are launching truth-squad operations’, American Journalism Review, 32:4, pp. 38–44.
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Staines, C. (2020), Full Fact: COVID-19 Misinformation Update #3 – Full Fact Report 2020: Fighting the Causes and Consequences of Bad Information, London: Full Fact, https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1673061/full-fact/2404710/. Accessed 12 August 2024.
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Terán González, E. (2019), Desinformación en la UE: ¿Amenaza híbrida o fenómeno comunicativo? Evolución de la estrategia de la UE desde 2015, Madrid: CEU Ediciones.
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Vázquez-Herrero, J., Vizoso, Á. and López-García, X. (2019), ‘Innovación tecnológica y comunicativa para combatir la desinformación: 135 experiencias para un cambio de rumbo’, El profesional de la información, 28:3, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.3145/epi.2019.may.01.
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Verschuuren, P. J., Gao, J., Eeden, A. van, Oikonomou, S. and Bandhakavi, A. (2023), ‘Logically at Factify 2: A multi-modal fact checking system based on evidence retrieval techniques and transformer encoder architecture’, arXiv, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.48550/arXiv.2301.03127.
  51. Vosoughi, S., Roy, D. and Aral, S. (2018), ‘The spread of true and false news online’, Science, 359:6380, pp. 1146–51.
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Walter, D., Ophir, Y. and Ye, H. (2023), ‘Conspiracies, misinformation and resistance to public health measures during COVID-19 in white nationalist online communication’, Vaccine, 41:17, pp. 2868–77.
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Wardle, C. and Derakhshan, H. (2017), Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policymaking, Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Young, D. G., Jamieson, K. H., Poulsen, S. and Goldring, A. (2018), ‘Fact-checking effectiveness as a function of format and tone: Evaluating FactCheck.org and FlackCheck.org’, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95:1, pp. 49–75.
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00112_1
Loading
Debunking practices and topics: Fact-checking agencies from the United Kingdom, France and Spain
Catalan Journal of Communication & Cultural Studies 16, 257 (2024); https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.1386/cjcs_00112_1
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00112_1
/content/journals/10.1386/cjcs_00112_1
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Article
Keyword(s): debunking; disinformation; fact checkers; misinformation; public health; public reason; verification

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a success
Invalid data
An error occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test