Boundary obsessions

References

1. Abram, David (1996), The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-Than-Human World, New York: Random House.
   [Google Scholar]
2. Akerman, James (2009), The Imperial Map: Cartography and the Mastery of Empire, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baker, George (2005), ‘Photography’s expanded field’, October, 114, pp. 120–40.
   [Google Scholar]
4. Barad, Karen (2007), Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
5. Barker, Emma, Web, Nick and Woods, Kim (1999), ‘Historical introduction: The idea of the artist’, in E. Barker, E. N. Web and K. Woods (eds), The Changing Status of the Artist, New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press, pp. 7–25.
   [Google Scholar]
6. Becher, Tony (1989), Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines, Milton Keynes: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
7. Bell, Richard (2002), ‘Bell’s Theorem: Aboriginal art: It’s a white thing!’, The Koori History Website Project, November, http://www.kooriweb.org/foley/great/art/bell.html. Accessed 19 April 2024.
8. Bell, Richard (2022), ‘Bell’s theorem (reductio ad infinitum): Contemporary art: It’s a white thing!’, Eflux, 9, p. 22, https://www.e-flux.com/journal/129/486788/bell-s-theorem-reductio-ad-infinitum-contemporary-art-it-s-a-white-thing/. Accessed 19 April 2024.
   [Google Scholar]
9. Bennett, Jane (2010), Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bois, Yve-Alain (2014), ‘Not [on] diagrams’, in S. Papapetros and J. Rose (eds), Retracing the Expanded Field: Encounters between Art and Architecture, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 48–50.
    [Google Scholar]
11. Bolt, Barbara (2007), ‘Material thinking and the agency of matter’, Studies in Material Thinking, 1:1, pp. 1–4, https://materialthinking.aut.ac.nz/papers/37.html. Accessed 19 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
12. Carmona, F. David, Jménez, Rafael and Collinson, J. Martin (2008), ‘The molecular basis of defective lens development in the Iberian mole’, BMC Biology, 6:44, pp. 2–19.
    [Google Scholar]
13. Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Felix (1987), A Thousand Plateaus: Schizophrenia and Capitalism (trans. B. Massumi), Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
    [Google Scholar]
14. Donald, Dwayne (2012), ‘Indigenous métissage: A decolonizing research sensibility’, International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 25:5, pp. 533–55.
    [Google Scholar]
15. Dronsfield, Johnathan Lahey (2009), ‘Theory as art practice: Notes for discipline’, Art and Research: A Journal of Ideas, Contexts and Methods, 2:2, pp. 1–3.
    [Google Scholar]
16. Fares, Gustavo and Philosophy Documentation Center (2004), ‘Painting in the expanded field’, Janus Head, 7:2, pp. 477–87.
    [Google Scholar]
17. Foucault, Michel (1972), The Archeology of Knowledge and the Discourse on Language, New York: Pantheon.
    [Google Scholar]
18. Gardam, Caroline (2021), ‘proppaNOW: Positioning “authentic” urban Aboriginal art’, Overland, 18 March, https://overland.org.au/2021/03/proppanow-positioning-authentic-urban-aboriginal-art/. Accessed 19 April 2024.
19. Haraway, Donna (2016), Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene, Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
20. Henderson, George and Waterstone, Marvin (2009), Geographic Thought: A Praxis Perspective, London: Routledge.
    [Google Scholar]
21. Humphries, Clare and Ugazio, Renée (2024), ‘Practice beyond boundaries’, Impact Printmaking Journal, 2, pp. 1–17, https://bibliotheek.ehb.be:2102/10.54632/524.IMPJ14.
    [Google Scholar]
22. Ingold, Tim (2007), ‘Materials against materiality’, Archaeological Dialogues, 14:1, pp. 1–16.
    [Google Scholar]
23. Kalina, Richard (2021), The Changing Boundaries and Nature of the Modern Art World: The Art Object and the Object of Art, London: Bloomsbury Academic.
    [Google Scholar]
24. Krauss, Rosalind (1979), ‘Sculpture in the expanded field’, October, 8, pp. 30–44.
    [Google Scholar]
25. Land, Clare (2015), Decolonising Solidarity, London: Bloomsbury.
    [Google Scholar]
26. Mbembe, Archille Joseph (2016), ‘Decolonizing the university: New directions’, Arts & Humanities in Higher Education, 15:1, pp. 29–45.
    [Google Scholar]
27. McLean, Ian A. (2013), ‘Surviving “the contemporary”: What Indigenous artists want, and how to get it’, Contemporary Visual Art + Culture Broadsheet, 42:3, pp. 167–73.
    [Google Scholar]
28. Meltzer, Eve (2013), ‘The expanded field and other, more fragile states of mind’, in E. Meltzer (ed.), Systems We Have Loved: Conceptual Art, Affect, and the Antihumanist Turn, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 117–52.
    [Google Scholar]
29. Metcalf, Bruce (1993), ‘Replacing the myth of modernism’, American Craft, 53:1, pp. 40–47.
    [Google Scholar]
30. Pallasmaa, Juhani (2009), The Thinking Hand: Existential and Embodied Thinking in Architecture, Chichester: John Whiley and Sons.
    [Google Scholar]
31. Papapetros, Spuros and Rose, Julian (eds) (2014), Retracing the Expanded Field: Encounters between Art and Architecture, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
    [Google Scholar]
32. Petts, Judith, Owens, Susan and Bulkeley, Harriet (2008), ‘Crossing boundaries: Interdisciplinarity in the context of urban environments’, Geoforum, 39:2, pp. 593–601.
    [Google Scholar]
33. Pyś, Pavel (2020), ‘Momentary arrest: Collecting interdisciplinary artworks’, The Walker Art Center, 21 May, https://walkerart.org/magazine/momentary-arrest-collecting-interdisciplinary-artworks. Accessed 19 April 2024.
34. Ravencroft, Alison (2018), ‘Strange weather: Indigenous Materialisms, New Materialism, and colonialism’, Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry, 5:3, pp. 353–70.
    [Google Scholar]
35. Rodgers, Paul and Bremner, Craig (2011), ‘“Alterplinarity: Alternative disciplinarity” in future art and design research pursuits’, Studies in Material Thinking, 6, December, pp. 1–16, https://materialthinking.aut.ac.nz/papers/64.html. Accessed 19 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]
36. Rose-Redwood, Reuben, Barnd, Natchee Blu, Luccchesi, Annita Hetoevėhotohke’e, Dias, Shanon and Patrick, Will (2020), ‘Decolonising the map: Recentering Indigenous mappings’, Cartographica, 55:3, pp. 151–52.
    [Google Scholar]
37. Rosiek, Jerry Lee, Snyder, Jimmy and Pratt, Scott L. (2020), ‘The New Materialisms and Indigenous theories of non-human agency: Making the case for respectful anti-colonial engagement’, Qualitative Inquiry, 26:3–4, pp. 331–46.
    [Google Scholar]
38. Schmedling, Olga (2015), ‘Questioning printmaking in the expanded field’, in J. Petterson (ed.), Printmaking in the Expanded Field, Oslo: Oslo National Academy of the Arts, pp. 41–45.
    [Google Scholar]
39. Sennett, Richard (2009), The Craftsman, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
    [Google Scholar]
40. Shumway, David R. and Messer-Davidow, Ellen (1991), ‘Disciplinarity: An introduction’, Poetics Today, 12:2, pp. 201–25.
    [Google Scholar]
41. Todd, Zoe (2016), ‘An Indigenous feminist’s take on the ontological turn: “Ontology” is just another word for colonialism’, Journal of Historical Sociology, 29:1, pp. 4–22.
    [Google Scholar]
42. Nets Victoria (2010), ‘“Jus” drawn: The proppaNow collective’, Nets Victoria, https://netsvictoria.org.au/exhibition/jus-drawn-the-proppanow-collective/. Accessed 19 April 2024.
43. Vidler, Anthony (2004), ‘Architecture’s expanded field’, Artforum, 42:8, pp. 142–47.
    [Google Scholar]
44. Weisberg, Ruth (1993), ‘Critical theory and the print: New criteria for print qualities in the expanded field’, Contemporary Impressions, 1:1, pp. 10–12.
    [Google Scholar]
45. Wolmark, Jenny and Gates-Stuart, Eleanor (2004), ‘Cultural hybrids, post-disciplinary digital practices and new research frameworks: Testing the limits’, Pixel Raiders 2 Conference, Australian Capital Territory, 6–8 April, Sheffield: Sheffield Hallam University, pp. 1–9, https://openresearch-repository.anu.edu.au/handle/1885/41954. Accessed 19 April 2024.
    [Google Scholar]