Question
Question
Is problem-solving therapy (PST) better than supportive therapy (ST) for reducing disability in older adults with depression and executive dysfunction?
Patients
221 older adults (aged >59 years) with major non-psychotic depression (Structured Clinical Interview for Axis-I DSM-IV disorders), 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score ≥20, Mini-Mental State Examination score ≥24, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale initiation/preservation domain (DRS-IP) score ≤33 and Stroop Colour-Word Test score ≤25.
Setting
Two research centres (Weill Cornell Medical College and University of California at San Francisco), USA; 2002–2007.
Intervention
PST versus ST for 12 weeks. PST was delivered individually over 12, once-weekly sessions and followed the unpublished manual, Social Problem Solving Therapy for Depression and Executive Dysfunction, which is based on setting and achieving goals, creating action plans and evaluating the accomplishment of goals. The first five sessions were educational, the subsequent seven based on enhancing skills and the final two on a relapse-prevention plan. Experienced clinical psychologists or licensed social workers received specific training in the delivery of each intervention.
Outcomes
Disability assessed using the 12-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II (WHODAS II), which gives a composite score across domains of understanding and communicating, getting around, self-care, household and work activities, getting along with others and participation in society. Assessments were carried out at baseline, weekly during the 12-week intervention (disability during treatment) and then at weeks 24 and 36 (disability after treatment). Between-group score differences were compared using mixed-effects models for longitudinal data; the models included treatment group, treatment site, time trend, and site × treatment and time × treatment interactions.
Patient follow-up
93.2% assessed at 12 weeks, 78.3% at 24 weeks and 75.6% at 36 weeks. 100% included in intention-to-treat analysis.