TableĀ 1

Methods used to assess patient's coagulation status

Method of assessmentNumber (%) n=102Neurosurgical unit number (%) n=25Non-neurosurgical unit number (%) n=77
INR/near-patient INR67 (65.7%)12 (48%)55 (71%)
Coagulation/clotting screen48 (47.1%)9 (36%)39 (51%)
Liver function tests3 (2.9%)1 (4%)2 (3%)
Laboratory tests (not specified)8 (7.8%)2 (8%)6 (8%)
ROTEM or TEG11 (10.8%)7 (28%)4 (5%)
Full blood count15 (14.7%)3 (12%)12 (16%)
Clinical findings8 (7.8%)2 (8%)6 (8%)
Platelets6 (5.9%)2(8%)4 (5%)
Fibrinogen/fibrin degradation product16 (15.7%)3(12%)13 (17%)
Activated partial thromboplastin time16 (15.7%)2 (8%)14 (18%)
Prothrombin time6 (5.9%)2 (8%)4 (5%)
Other6 (5.9%)4 (16%)2 (3%)
Liaise with haematology2 (2.0%)0 (0%)2 (3%)
  • Other: haemoglobin, thrombin time, intracellular calcium, arterial and venous blood gases, D Dimer and Urea and Electrolytes (U&Es).

  • Free text box is used and so any number of responses is permitted. Total respondents=102.

  • INR, International normalised ratio; ROTEM, rotational thromboelastometry; TEG, thromboelastography.