Table 3

Summary of findings: APM versus non-surgical comparators

OutcomeEndpointParticipants
(RCTs)
Standardised MD
(95% CI)
MD
(95% CI)
I2 GRADE quality*
(A) All patients (any type of meniscal tear with or without radiographic osteoarthritis)
 PainUnder 6 months434 (2 RCTs)0.18 (−0.00 to 0.37)(KOOS pain)
4.46 better (0.22 to 8.71)
0%⨁◯◯◯ Very low†‡
6–12 months943 (5 RCTs)0.22 (0.03 to 0.40)4.10 better (0.74 to 7.46)48%⨁⨁◯◯ Low†
Over 12 months484 (3 RCTs)0.22 (0.04 to 0.40)4.43 better (0.72 to 8.14)0%⨁◯◯◯ Very low†‡
 FunctionUnder 6 months561 (4 RCTs)0.08 (−0.08 to 0.25)(Lysholm scale)
1.38 better (−1.54 to 4.31)
0%⨁⨁◯◯ Low†
6–12 months1050 (6 RCTs)0.18 (0.04 to 0.33)3.36 better (0.55 to 6.16)27%⨁⨁◯◯ Low†
Over 12 months730 (5 RCTs)0.18 (0.04 to 0.33)2.59 better (0.29 to 4.89)0%⨁⨁◯◯ Low†
 Knee-specific QoLUnder 6 months129 (1 RCT)0.45 (0.10 to 0.80)(KOOS QoL)
9.59 better (2.34 to 16.84)
NA⨁⨁◯◯ Low†
6–12 months350 (3 RCTs)0.43 (0.10 to 0.75)10.36 better (3.58 to 17.14)56%⨁⨁◯◯ Low†
Over 12 months245 (2 RCTs)0.30 (0.05 to 0.56)6.92 better (1.33 to 12.52)0%⨁◯◯◯ Very low†‡
 Generic QoLUnder 6 monthsNoneNA(EQ-5D VAS) NANANA
6–12 months130 (1 RCT)0.01 (−0.34 to 0.35)0.00 better (−0.06 to 0.06)NA⨁⨁◯◯ Low†
Over 12 months113 (1 RCT)0.47 (0.10 to 0.85)0.10 better (0.02 to 0.18)NA⨁◯◯◯ Very low†‡
(B) Patients with any type of meniscal tear in a non-osteoarthritic knee
 PainUnder 6 months306 (2 RCTs)0.16 (−0.25 to 0.57)(KOOS pain)
3.28 better (−4.33 to 10.90)
68%⨁◯◯◯ Very low†‡§
6–12 months402 (3 RCTs)0.35 (0.04 to 0.66)6.91 better (2.87 to 10.94)58%⨁◯◯◯ Very low†§¶
Over 12 months368 (3 RCTs)0.21 (0.00 to 0.42)4.15 better (0.14 to 8.16)0%⨁◯◯◯ Very low†‡
 FunctionUnder 6 months411 (3 RCTs)0.11 (−0.13 to 0.35)(Lysholm scale)
1.93 better (−2.40 to 6.26)
33%⨁⨁◯◯ Low†
6–12 months507 (4 RCTs)0.30 (0.06 to 0.53)5.31 better (1.12 to 9.51)44%⨁◯◯◯ Very low†‡
Over 12 months501 (4 RCTs)0.19 (0.01 to 0.36)2.69 better (−0.65 to 6.03)0%⨁⨁◯◯ Low†
 Knee-specific QoLUnder 6 months124 (1 RCT)0.52 (0.16 to 0.87)(KOOS QoL)
10.42 better (3.36 to 17.48)
NA⨁⨁◯◯ Low†
6–12 months244 (2 RCTs)0.59 (0.11 to 1.07)12.89 better (3.60 to 22.18)71%⨁⨁◯◯ Low†
Over 12 months231 (2 RCTs)0.39 (0.13 to 0.65)8.40 better (2.86 to 13.95)0%⨁⨁◯◯ Low†
 Generic QoLUnder 6 monthsNoneNA(EQ-5D VAS) NANANA
6–12 months119 (1 RCT)0.06 (−0.30 to 0.42)0.01 better (−0.05 to 0.08)NA⨁⨁◯◯ Low†
Over 12 months105 (1 RCT)0.63 (0.23 to 1.02)0.13 better (0.05 to 0.21)NA⨁◯◯◯ Very low†‡
  • SMD in function was translated and re-expressed as an MD in the Lysholm knee scale, using the SD of 19.4 reported for patients with isolated meniscal tears.79

  • *GRADE rating explanations.41

  • †Risk of bias (very serious): no blinding of participants.

  • ‡Imprecision (serious): wide CI including potential MCID (benefit) with MD less than MCID.

  • §Inconsistency (very serious): high level of heterogeneity (>50%) between studies.

  • ¶Imprecision (very serious): wide CI including no benefit and potential MCID (benefit).

  • APM, arthroscopic partial meniscectomy; EQ-5D, EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire; GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation; I2, heterogeneity; KOOS, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score; MD, mean difference; QoL, quality of life; RCTs, randomised controlled trials; SMD, standardised mean difference; VAS, visual analogue pain score.