Quality assessment for studies on the relationship of sedentary behaviour with cognitive function
Cohort designs | Case-control designs | Cross-sectional designs | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STROBE checklist* | Hamer and Stamatakis23 | Kesse-Guyot et al24 | Kesse-Guyot et al25 | Kivipelto et al26 | Lindstrom et al27 | Rosenberg et al28 | Steinberg et al29 | Vance et al30 |
1 | + | + | + | − | + | − | − | − |
2 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
3 | − | + | + | − | + | + | − | + |
4 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
5 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
6 | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + |
7 | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + |
8 | + | + | + | + | − | + | + | + |
9 | + | + | + | + | − | − | − | − |
10 | + | + | + | + | − | 1 | − | − |
11 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
12 | + | + | − | + | + | + | + | + |
13 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
14 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
15 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
16 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
17 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
18 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
19 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
20 | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + |
21 | + | + | + | + | + | − | + | + |
22 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
*The STROBE checklist asks the following information (+=Reported; −=Not reported):
1. Indicates study design in title and abstract and provides an informative and balance summary in the abstract.
2. Gives the scientific background and rationale.
3. States specific objectives and hypotheses.
4. Presents key elements of study design.
5. Describes setting, location, exposures, follow-up and relevant dates.
6. Clearly defines eligibility criteria and methods of selecting participants.
7. Clearly defines outcomes, exposures, potential confounders, predictors and effect modifiers.
8. Gives sources of data and clearly defines method of assessment.
9. Describes potential bias.
10. Explains how study size was arrived at.
11. Explains how quantitative variables were handled in analysis.
12. Describes all statistical analyses.
13. Reports number of individuals at each stage of study and gives reasons for non-participation.
14. Gives characteristics of study participants and indicates number of missing data.
15. Reports number of events (outcomes and/or exposures).
16. Clearly provides the main results of analyses.
17. Reports all other analyses done.
18. Summarises key findings with reference to study objectives.
19. Discusses limitations of the study.
20. Provides a cautious overall interpretation of the study.
21. Discusses the generalisability of the findings.
22. Gives the sources of funding and role of the funders.