Table 3

Head-to-head studies comparing biological DMARDs to other biological DMARDs

PopulationStudyRisk of biasTreatmentnPrimary endpointResultP / 95% CIACR20 (%)ACR50 (%)DAS28≤3.2 (%)DAS28<2.6 (%)CDAI≤2.8 (%)ΔHAQ
csDMARD naïve early RAHetland 2020 (NORD-STAR)32 High (single-blinded)GC+MTX/ SSZ + HCQ + GC i.a.+MTX200Adjusted difference of CDAI ≤2.8
(week 24)
Reference127 (71.3)84 (47.2)
CZP 200 mg Q2W+MTX2033.9−5.5 to 13.2139 (77.2)97 (53.9)
ABA 125 mg QW+MTX2049.40.1 to 18.7142 (74)107 (55.4)
TCZ 8 mg/kg Q4W or TCZ 162 mg QW+MTX188−0.6−10.1 to 8.9119 (73)77 (46.7)
MTX-IRFeist ACR 2021 / Smolen 2022 (CREDO 2)29 30 LowPlacebo+MTX243ACR20
(week 12)
108 (44.4)108 (44.4)55 (22.6)*31 (12.8)148 (31.9) *10
(4.1)*
−0.42*
OKZ 64 mg Q2W+MTX464326 (70.3)0.034326 (70.3)234 (50.4)*210 (45.3)168 (35.1) *52 (11.2)*−0.64*
OKZ 64 mg Q4W+MTX479342 (71.4)0.045342 (71.4)240 (50.1)*219 (45.7)132 (28.6) *58 (12.1)*−0.61*
ADA 40 mg Q2W+MTX462309 (66.9)Reference309 (66.9)214 (46.3)*177 (38.3)26 (10.7)*60 (13.0)*−0.61*
TNF-IR
(B-cell poor based on histology)
Humby 2021 (R4RA)31 High
(open-label)
B-cell poor: RTX 1000 mg (d1, d15) + csDMARDs38CDAI50% response
(week 16)
17 (45%)Reference12 (32%)7 (18)−0.3±0.1
B-cell poor: TCZ 8 mg/kg Q4W+csDMARDs4123 (56%)0.3119 (46%)13 (32)−0.4±0.1
  • Results of secondary efficacy outcomes are shown at the timepoint of the primary endpoint.

  • *Week 24.

  • ABA, abatacept; ACR, American College of Rheumatology; ADA, adalimumab; CDAI, Clinical Disease Activity Index ; csDMARD, conventional synthetic DMARD; CZP, certolizumab-pegol; DMARD, disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; GC, glucocorticoids; HAQ, health assessment questionnaire; HCQ, hydroxychloroquine; i.a., intra-articular; IR, insufficient response; MTX, methotrexate; OKZ, olokizumab; PBO, placebo; QW, weekly; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q4W, every 4 weeks; RTX, rituximab; SSZ, sulfasalazine; TCZ, tocilizumab; TNF, tumour necrosis factor alpha.