Table 4

MACE, comparison between different bDMARDs/tsDMARDs (observational studies)

Study IDRegistryInterventionControlaHR (i vs c)Risk of bias
MACE
Hsieh et al 70 2020Claims datasetTCZRTX 0.41 (0.23; 0.72)High
ABA 0.25 (0.11; 0.55)
Khosrow-Khavar et al 69 2022Claims datasetTOFATNFi1.01 (0.83; 1.23)High
Kremer et al 71 2021CORRONATOFAbDMARD0.61 (0.34; 1.06)Low
Xie et al 18 Claims datasetTNFiTCZ1.27 (1.02, 1.59)High
ADA1.33 (0.99, 1.80)
ETA1.10 (0.80, 1.51)
INF 1.61 (1.22, 2.12)
ABA1.01 (0.79, 1.28)
RTX1.16 (0.89, 1.53)
Heart failure
Hsieh et al 70 2020Claims datasetTCZRTX0.48 (0.18; 1.31)High
ABA 0.20 (0.05; 0.83)
Khosrow-Khavar et al 69 2022Claims datasetTOFATNFi1.07 (0.79; 1.46)High
Myocardial infarction
Hsieh et al 70 2020Claims datasetTCZRTX 0.12 (0.02; 0.56)High
ABA0.26 (0.06; 1.12)
Khosrow-Khavar et al 69 2022Claims datasetTOFATNFi1.04 (0.82; 1.33)High
Xie et al 18 2019Claims datasetTNFiTCZ1.20 (0.88; 1.62)High
ADA1.24 (0.83; 1.87)
ETA1.08 (0.71; 1.65)
INF 1.55 (1.05; 2.28)
ABA1.01 (0.73; 1.40)
RTX1.05 (0.72; 1.54)
Stroke
Hsieh et al 70 2020Claims datasetTCZRTX0.54 (0.26; 1.12)High
ABA 0.18 (0.05; 0.64)
Khosrow-Khavar et al 69 2022Claims datasetTOFATNFi0.93 (0.66; 1.31)High
Xie et al 18 2019Claims datasetTNFiTCZ1.25 (0.90; 1.73)High
ADA1.26 (0.80; 1.99)
ETA1.09 (0.68; 1.75)
INF 1.49 (1.01; 2.21)
ABA0.99 (0.70; 1.40)
RTX1.10 (0.74; 1.63)
Venous thromboembolism
Desai et al 24 2021Claims datasetTOFATNFi1.13 (0.77; 1.65)High
  • Values in bold highlight statistically significant effect sizes. Additional details in online supplemental tables S68–S100.

  • i; intervention; ABA, abatacept; ADA, adalimumab; aHR, adjusted HR; bDMARD, biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug; c, control; CORRONA, Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America; ETA, etanercept; INF, infliximab; RTX, rituximab; TCZ, tocilizumab; TNFi, TNF inhibitor; TOFA, tofacitinib; tsDMARD, targeted synthetic DMARD.